I know right. Instead of going to another store they specifically want yours even though you don't want to and they don't like you for being a homophobic bigot lol. If i didn't like the way a store owner/worker treated me i would never go back. But gay people, they go back and cry and sue and threaten to burn your whole world down lmfao. Another example of the peaceful left.
If itโs not protected by law then sure. Theyโre private companies after all right?
Also Nazis are specifically white ethnonationalists who believe in the Jewish question and white replacement. You can call it โany right wing opinionโ but thatโs not gonna make the Nazis go away.
Yeah, Chassidim are still usually pretty conservative, but they are kind of a thing to their own, and there are obviously different Chassidic sects too.
If your mom "converted back" to Catholicism, would her Beit Din or whoever invalidate her conversion? Idk the specific terminology, but I know that that can happen.
I don't know to be honest, it's nothing she's ever really thought about doing. She's gotten pretty into it to because when she converted she was not really practicing Catholicism
Unironically, I've heard there are rabbis - especially in NYC - that will be quite lenient on ensuring a "halakhic" conversion for the right price, or perhaps "donation".
That's just a side note; not saying your mom did that. I do wonder about Jael (Ivanka) though....
What do you mean by this? Believe's jews have power? Criticizes the state of Israel? Most muslims (and chinese) fall into both of these categories.
Wouldn't you say the specific issue is threatening violence against jews?
white ethnonationalists
Almost every country prior to 1930 was an ethnostate, many are still ethnostates today (Japan, China, Israel, etc). Countries need shared values, commonly this comes from race and culture.
This is one reason why we have such a low trust society, centered only around financial transactions.
In the 1795 immigration act of the united states, it specifically says immigrants must be "White free men". Are the founding Father's Nazis?
Once, again wouldn't you say the issue here would be violence? Not policies that favors natural citizens over outsiders?
white replacement
There is no question this is real and Democrats regularly applaud it for giving them increasing power in California and Texas.
Want to know some other positions Nazis held?
Eliminating capitalism.
Hating big banks.
Favoring workers rights and unions.
Environmentalism.
Do you hold these same positions in the same contempt?
The Jewish question is specifically about the belief in a global cabal of jews who are actively trying to undermine โwhitenessโ and destroy western civilization. You can dislike Israel all you want, Iโm not a hypocrite I can see that theyโre basically a fascist theocratic ethnostate. Itโs not intrinsically about violence towards Jews, although thatโs a common result of Nazi ideology, itโs more about believing in a global conspiracy of Jews to oppress and replace white people.
Countries having always been ethnostates is a flat out lie, immigration has been a part of US history since itโs creation and there have always been people who oppose it. The Irish back in the 1840s were seen as nonwhites and as threats to the American way of life as well. Anti immigration is nothing new, especially when itโs fueled by racialized us vs them rhetoric. You say that homogenous cultures are more stable and even if that were true youโre still conflating race and culture.
Idk what youโre referring to with white replacement which Democrats applaud. Also Nazis only favored workers rights nominally, workers still had no say over the distribution of their wages or product. Private businesses were still largely owned by the capitalists, they were just under the threat of seizure by the government. The Nazis were characterized by the unification of the private and government sectors, like every fascist state.
The first ammendment needs to be broadened. You can't just get fired because you said some shit on facebook.
dedekulm ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 02:49:37 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I agree. Freedom of Speech is a broader concept that just what the 1st Amendment protects. The most practical thing the right should do is use the left's playground push, at the federal level, to make political views a protected class. That would protect Speech from corporate chicanery, and hopefully stop attempts to make hate speech laws a thing.
TikTokโs efforts to provide locally sensitive moderation have resulted in it banning any content that could be seen as positive to gay people or gay rights, down to same-sex couples holding hands, even in countries where homosexuality has never been illegal, the Guardian can reveal.
Is tik tok really that popular? The only people Iโve seen on tik tok videos online were legit retarded people, southerners in trailers, obese people, and cringe edgelord dudes.
The bill of rights does apply to private companies. Now that social media has been ruled a public platform if you're censored off twitter, reddit, youtube, etc for political speech you can charge them with a felony under 18 USC 241. It's just that 99.9% of people don't know this and the other 0.1% don't want to deal with the hassle.
That does not change the fact that by signing on and using the service, you sign a Terms of Service, which is essentially a contract. Otherwise, literally any job you work at can be charged with a felony because companies have standards for these things as well. I.e. a company not allowing employees to bring guns on company property, which you also sign off on as an employee
That's different. A company policy preventing you from talking about politics on company time isn't infringing your right to free speech because you can still get your message out on your off time. Likewise one preventing you from bringing a gun to work. Twitter, by banning people for constitutionally protected speech, is preventing them from getting their message out in the same way that someone setting up a road block on a highway would be blocking your right free travel even if that person built the road under contract with the state.
A TOS is invalid if it prevents you from exercising your rights. Just as a TOS that said Jack Dorsey could come to your house and rape you at will would be invalid. Any contract with an exculpatory clause, ie something along the lines of "you can't sue ever for any reason, even if we are negligent" will almost always be thrown out by the courts....or at least that portion of the contract will be voided.
There are many other ways to get a message out besides Reddit or Twitter. There are many ways you can do so on your โown timeโ. Ffs free website builders exist. It is not stopping you on your own time
Businesses have a right to refuse service to anyone for any reason, yes even the wedding cake for the gay couple before you bring that up.
Libraries can ban people for using their computers for porn, and those are considered public domains. I hear nobody complaining about that.
When talking about free speech you have to understand the concept of the public space. In order for you to get your message out you have to be able to speak where people are. Cops cant prevent you from speaking on a crowded street, even they try to move you to a less crowded area and allow you to speak there. Not only do you have the right to say what you want, but you also have the right to say it to as many people as reasonably possible. The courts have confirmed that social media is a pubic space for purposes of the first amendment It is the de facto way to get your message to lots of people. Therefore all constitutional protections apply.
Okay but if you went onto a crowded street and started yelling racial slurs (or the classic example โFireโ when thereโs no fire) youโre going to cause a disturbance which can affect the peace, and in that case there will be repercussions. Spreading false news and being a racist POS online can be just as harmful and should be regulated by whichever authority applies
You're conflating several very different things. You can throw out racial slurs all you want, it's protected speech. If you're yelling, regardless of content, the police might ask you to quiet down.
Yelling fire when there is no fire is potentially one of the few types of prohibited speech, defamation also falls into this category. It must be 1) something you know is false and 2) cause demonstrable harm. If you yell fire when there is none and everyone laughs at you it's fine, if you yell fire and someone gets hurt then you're on the hook.
Not being racist is arguably spreading false news, so I'm not sure how you'd regulate that without creating a catch 22.
Exactly, the police asking you to quiet down or people getting angry at you is a form of societal consequence. Being banned from a service that you are choosing to use is a societal consequence. I was not talking about explicitly legal consequence
Crock oโ shite... if you could all these whining bitches like milo would be suing. Tia tequila, roger stone, and other assholes like them have plenty of money for lawyers.
[deleted] ยท 211 points ยท Posted at 12:02:37 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Oh your company don't want to make a wedding cake for a gay couple? Time to sue.
[deleted] ยท 152 points ยท Posted at 14:43:52 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Bake the gay cake, wax my female balls and let me inject estrogen into your son bigot.
z_derApfel ยท -9 points ยท Posted at 16:06:36 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Oh you're such a victim in that imaginary scenario
theyearsstartcomin ยท 69 points ยท Posted at 18:50:56 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I drove 400 miles to find your shop so obviously theres no other place to get wedding cakes
Thiswaycomrads ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:31:22 on January 5, 2020 ยท (Permalink)
I know right. Instead of going to another store they specifically want yours even though you don't want to and they don't like you for being a homophobic bigot lol. If i didn't like the way a store owner/worker treated me i would never go back. But gay people, they go back and cry and sue and threaten to burn your whole world down lmfao. Another example of the peaceful left.
TotallyNotUssrSpy ยท 91 points ยท Posted at 14:28:22 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Glordit ยท 105 points ยท Posted at 11:58:49 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Ah. The classic, double standard.
hercmavzeb ยท -18 points ยท Posted at 01:37:55 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
LGBT=protected class, Nazi=/=protected class
lispmemethrowaway ยท 31 points ยท Posted at 22:35:43 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
So can private companies ban whatever content they want or not?
hercmavzeb ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 22:39:13 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
If itโs not protected by law then sure. Theyโre private companies after all right?
Also Nazis are specifically white ethnonationalists who believe in the Jewish question and white replacement. You can call it โany right wing opinionโ but thatโs not gonna make the Nazis go away.
bball84958294 ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 02:54:26 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Right, anyone who talks about these things is a NAAAAAAHHHHTTTTTSSSSSSEEEEEE.
hercmavzeb ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 04:40:21 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Talks about them if theyโre real and not just nonsense conspiracy theories then yeah ๐๐๐ like by definition
jedderbob ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 17:29:16 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
White replacement is real and I want to stop it, this is coming from a practicing Jew by the way.
bball84958294 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 16:40:37 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Be Catholic.
jedderbob ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 23:25:20 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
my mom was
bball84958294 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:27:41 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Did she leave the Church or did she die?
My condolences if the latter.
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:28:03 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
she converted for my dad
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:29:01 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I was getting at why you said "was".
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:29:32 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, she was Catholic but then she converted to Judaism for my dad.
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:32:01 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Oh I thought you were saying she converted to Catholicism for your dad, so I was confused, lol.
What denomination did she convert to?
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:33:42 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
We're modern orthodox. I don't wear a yarmulka all day but were pretty damn observant.
Tbh the more religious Jews get, the less leftists you will find. Until you get to a lot of the Hassidim in America that blatantly abuse welfare.
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:36:03 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, Chassidim are still usually pretty conservative, but they are kind of a thing to their own, and there are obviously different Chassidic sects too.
If your mom "converted back" to Catholicism, would her Beit Din or whoever invalidate her conversion? Idk the specific terminology, but I know that that can happen.
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:38:34 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I don't know to be honest, it's nothing she's ever really thought about doing. She's gotten pretty into it to because when she converted she was not really practicing Catholicism
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:41:10 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Does she follow all of the halakhic requirements when she's a niddah?
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:42:44 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Holy shit, you know more than me but wtf, I don't know my mom's menstrual habits lol
She converted in the halakhic way however
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:12:47 on December 27, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Who's Jewing who now??
jedderbob ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:13:01 on December 27, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
lmao
bball84958294 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:15:52 on December 27, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Unironically, I've heard there are rabbis - especially in NYC - that will be quite lenient on ensuring a "halakhic" conversion for the right price, or perhaps "donation".
That's just a side note; not saying your mom did that. I do wonder about Jael (Ivanka) though....
But seriously, you should look into Catholicism.
IT_IS_YET_ANOTHER ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:30:19 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Stop practicing, you're doing a bad job. Good thing you're not doing it for real.
bball84958294 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:40:21 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Marx was a Nazi??
lispmemethrowaway ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 17:43:08 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)*
I think that's a reasonable reply.
What do you mean by this? Believe's jews have power? Criticizes the state of Israel? Most muslims (and chinese) fall into both of these categories.
Wouldn't you say the specific issue is threatening violence against jews?
Almost every country prior to 1930 was an ethnostate, many are still ethnostates today (Japan, China, Israel, etc). Countries need shared values, commonly this comes from race and culture. This is one reason why we have such a low trust society, centered only around financial transactions. In the 1795 immigration act of the united states, it specifically says immigrants must be "White free men". Are the founding Father's Nazis?
Once, again wouldn't you say the issue here would be violence? Not policies that favors natural citizens over outsiders?
There is no question this is real and Democrats regularly applaud it for giving them increasing power in California and Texas.
Want to know some other positions Nazis held? Eliminating capitalism. Hating big banks. Favoring workers rights and unions. Environmentalism. Do you hold these same positions in the same contempt?
hercmavzeb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:53:58 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
The Jewish question is specifically about the belief in a global cabal of jews who are actively trying to undermine โwhitenessโ and destroy western civilization. You can dislike Israel all you want, Iโm not a hypocrite I can see that theyโre basically a fascist theocratic ethnostate. Itโs not intrinsically about violence towards Jews, although thatโs a common result of Nazi ideology, itโs more about believing in a global conspiracy of Jews to oppress and replace white people.
Countries having always been ethnostates is a flat out lie, immigration has been a part of US history since itโs creation and there have always been people who oppose it. The Irish back in the 1840s were seen as nonwhites and as threats to the American way of life as well. Anti immigration is nothing new, especially when itโs fueled by racialized us vs them rhetoric. You say that homogenous cultures are more stable and even if that were true youโre still conflating race and culture.
Idk what youโre referring to with white replacement which Democrats applaud. Also Nazis only favored workers rights nominally, workers still had no say over the distribution of their wages or product. Private businesses were still largely owned by the capitalists, they were just under the threat of seizure by the government. The Nazis were characterized by the unification of the private and government sectors, like every fascist state.
killnigs420 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 12:59:15 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Protected classes are bullshit anyway
Hadzabadza ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 12:57:31 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
...why?
hercmavzeb ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 19:15:35 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Because being born LGBT isnโt a choice but becoming a Nazi is
Hadzabadza ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 21:51:23 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Akshhhhually political views are highly heritable and many LGBTWTFBBQs are indeed just trendies, get with the times, bigot
And I'm not even joking
bball84958294 ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 02:53:42 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Lol.
Darth_Toenail ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 01:05:39 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
You again? Fuck off already and go lick someone else's windows.
badpunsinagoofyfont ยท 56 points ยท Posted at 15:52:07 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Wtf I love Tiktok now.
ChocolateWaffles- ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 05:04:45 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Because they removed LGBT content? Or because of the joke?
IsackB ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 10:06:55 on December 26, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
A response best left unanswered
Shadow_Of_ ยท 71 points ยท Posted at 14:08:08 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
The first ammendment needs to be broadened. You can't just get fired because you said some shit on facebook.
dedekulm ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 02:49:37 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I agree. Freedom of Speech is a broader concept that just what the 1st Amendment protects. The most practical thing the right should do is use the left's playground push, at the federal level, to make political views a protected class. That would protect Speech from corporate chicanery, and hopefully stop attempts to make hate speech laws a thing.
anti-hypergamist ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 02:56:03 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
There's supposedly laws against firing someone for their political views but you know how that goes.
bigestboybob ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 15:14:30 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
imo you should be able to but you shouldnt be able to take action against companies (not on a personal level) that say bad shit
Kim_Jon_Ok ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 15:04:39 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
They hate TikTok likes every adults but they still want representation.
DesiThug1998 ยท 34 points ยท Posted at 16:12:05 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
TikTok is for looking at hot high school girls. China knows what it is doing
bball84958294 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 02:54:43 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Cringe, Coomer.
Mr-Sneak ยท 49 points ยท Posted at 15:41:23 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
TikTok removed LGBT content? Fucking based?
Top_Smug ยท 28 points ยท Posted at 19:24:58 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
appearantly tik tok has a quota for content with lgbt content and disabled people in it. everything beyond the set number gets removed.
SnowlandGhost ยท 32 points ยท Posted at 20:19:40 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Good thing too, the app probably wouldn't have taken off as much as it is if half the content was people trying to push their agenda on the users.
AceToMouth ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 21:11:02 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I hope that number is zero.
DownvoterAccount ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:41:11 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
LGBTQuota.
Jesus-is-lord- ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 20:07:38 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
brianjonestown ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 04:26:46 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Chicoms don't tolerate that LGBT stuff in the public sphere.
Ilkerko ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 20:04:12 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Tiktok is based
chokingapple ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 14:27:53 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
what the fuck did you do to the D
SvechDotNet ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 21:57:49 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Is tik tok really that popular? The only people Iโve seen on tik tok videos online were legit retarded people, southerners in trailers, obese people, and cringe edgelord dudes.
Pukalo_Reincarnate ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 07:35:22 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
but muh protected classes
ForgottenMemes ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 21:36:11 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
The bill of rights does apply to private companies. Now that social media has been ruled a public platform if you're censored off twitter, reddit, youtube, etc for political speech you can charge them with a felony under 18 USC 241. It's just that 99.9% of people don't know this and the other 0.1% don't want to deal with the hassle.
Wittobeast ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 02:35:20 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Doesn't the law get a bit iffy in regards to the internet because the internet transcends borders?
ForgottenMemes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:42:11 on December 23, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
If anyone in the country conspires to inhbit your constitutional rights they've committed a felony.
If reddit was based in Israel than they might be immune, but they're not.
z_derApfel ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:07:19 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
I'd like a source for that
ForgottenMemes ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:19:45 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=18+USC+241
z_derApfel ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 23:17:45 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)*
So it is in fact a law, I learned something new.
That does not change the fact that by signing on and using the service, you sign a Terms of Service, which is essentially a contract. Otherwise, literally any job you work at can be charged with a felony because companies have standards for these things as well. I.e. a company not allowing employees to bring guns on company property, which you also sign off on as an employee
ForgottenMemes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:41:36 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)*
That's different. A company policy preventing you from talking about politics on company time isn't infringing your right to free speech because you can still get your message out on your off time. Likewise one preventing you from bringing a gun to work. Twitter, by banning people for constitutionally protected speech, is preventing them from getting their message out in the same way that someone setting up a road block on a highway would be blocking your right free travel even if that person built the road under contract with the state.
A TOS is invalid if it prevents you from exercising your rights. Just as a TOS that said Jack Dorsey could come to your house and rape you at will would be invalid. Any contract with an exculpatory clause, ie something along the lines of "you can't sue ever for any reason, even if we are negligent" will almost always be thrown out by the courts....or at least that portion of the contract will be voided.
z_derApfel ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:20:22 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)*
There are many other ways to get a message out besides Reddit or Twitter. There are many ways you can do so on your โown timeโ. Ffs free website builders exist. It is not stopping you on your own time
Businesses have a right to refuse service to anyone for any reason, yes even the wedding cake for the gay couple before you bring that up.
Libraries can ban people for using their computers for porn, and those are considered public domains. I hear nobody complaining about that.
ForgottenMemes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:32:54 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
When talking about free speech you have to understand the concept of the public space. In order for you to get your message out you have to be able to speak where people are. Cops cant prevent you from speaking on a crowded street, even they try to move you to a less crowded area and allow you to speak there. Not only do you have the right to say what you want, but you also have the right to say it to as many people as reasonably possible. The courts have confirmed that social media is a pubic space for purposes of the first amendment It is the de facto way to get your message to lots of people. Therefore all constitutional protections apply.
z_derApfel ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 18:34:27 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)*
Okay but if you went onto a crowded street and started yelling racial slurs (or the classic example โFireโ when thereโs no fire) youโre going to cause a disturbance which can affect the peace, and in that case there will be repercussions. Spreading false news and being a racist POS online can be just as harmful and should be regulated by whichever authority applies
matthewfullest ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:13:34 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
โLet daddy government decide what words Iโm allowed to useโ
ForgottenMemes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:33:22 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
You're conflating several very different things. You can throw out racial slurs all you want, it's protected speech. If you're yelling, regardless of content, the police might ask you to quiet down.
Yelling fire when there is no fire is potentially one of the few types of prohibited speech, defamation also falls into this category. It must be 1) something you know is false and 2) cause demonstrable harm. If you yell fire when there is none and everyone laughs at you it's fine, if you yell fire and someone gets hurt then you're on the hook.
Not being racist is arguably spreading false news, so I'm not sure how you'd regulate that without creating a catch 22.
z_derApfel ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:44:08 on December 25, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Exactly, the police asking you to quiet down or people getting angry at you is a form of societal consequence. Being banned from a service that you are choosing to use is a societal consequence. I was not talking about explicitly legal consequence
Nomandate ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:55:09 on December 22, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
Crock oโ shite... if you could all these whining bitches like milo would be suing. Tia tequila, roger stone, and other assholes like them have plenty of money for lawyers.
z_derApfel ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 16:06:13 on December 24, 2019 ยท (Permalink)
It's different because China directly influences Tiktok, Reddit actually is a private company
studentscooter ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:49:20 on February 23, 2020 ยท (Permalink)
Late comment but I've met so many of these cunts, fuck them.