This is clearly a hoax... perpetuated by bored adolecents trying to scare locals into thinking dinosaurs are real!
In similar fasion to the yeti, bigfoot, and crop circles!
Besides, as any attendee of Liberty University would know, the earth is only 5,000 years old...
I hearby dub this link - Fake and gay.
Probably didn't want to make the dinosaurs too scary looking. But that T-Rex looked like John Wayne. He was awesome and intimidating.
Absay ยท 244 points ยท Posted at 07:08:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
But the Dinosaur movie (2000) features much more realistic creatures. I remember the "Carnotaurus" thing was awesome. For The Good Dinosaur I wouldn't have expected the same dinosaurs or even the same level of realism but they ended up looking extremely simplistic.
edit: typo. I'm not saying The Good Dinosaur should have been (necessarily) more realistic. I'm saying that not making it more realistic because it could have scared kids is stupid since Dinosaur had much more cool-looking dinosaurs and I don't remember that movie scaring anyone.
Loved this movie when I was a kid. Still looks great over a decade later. That's really something especially considering the state of CGI back then.
[deleted] ยท 46 points ยท Posted at 09:15:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
On closer inspection it has some flaws. I got the bluray, and there's some problems, but it is pretty good given the year it was released. The key to how good it sometimes looks is the fact that the movie uses real backdrops for nearly everything, though that is a double edged sword as the dinos sometimes contrast poorly.
Xciv ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 15:34:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Animation has way more to do with creating realistic movements than fidelity. You have 80s-90s anime with tiny hand-drawn flaws all over the place, but Cowboy Bebop is still one of the best animated shows in the medium because of how the characters move and the interesting direction of all their movements (no talking heads in that show).
In the same vein 3D animation will always be outpaced technologically, but movies such as Dinosaur are still perfectly fine and watchable because care was put into every movement of the dinosaurs. Even if the textures aren't up to modern standards, the actual animation is, and that's what matters most.
An example I like to bring up is Polar Express, an animated movie that cared too much about looking good in the wrong places. Everything looked great, except that the faces weren't animated enough, so everyone felt like a block of wood. The technology that went into that film were cutting edge, but the animation will simply not stand the test of time.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 00:59:24 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
The animation is incredibly unrealistic, but the model still looks like it's actually there. Why? Because the shading is really good. Shading is what causes CGI to fail or to exceed.
Dimzorz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:12:06 on April 9, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well that's only true on some things because using that (funny as hell) late for meeting clip as an example, the person in that video looks much more like the environment than that car. So there you have to consider, what makes the difference, is it the shading, lightning, textures, etc.
Really? Never watched it as a kid, and it looks pretty awful to me.
Picklelol ยท 130 points ยท Posted at 07:36:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
holy shit you just hit me with the nostalgia too hard man this movie was the shit when i was 7 or 8, i don't remember when i watched this but i was 7 in 2000 lol
Oh man I remember this movie... I had it on VHS. I remember how emotionally attached you were to those movies when you were a kid. The scene where the meteor struck was intense as hell.
As an irrelevant side note, I feel almost as if when you were a kid, things were "psychedelic" to an extent. When I watch these old scenes many years later, they feel the same as watching something which I watched on LSD a while ago. It's a very odd feeling. Maybe when you were a kid, your brains' "presumptions" of things are not fully developed, thus making things appear overly intensive and oddly exciting, just like on psychedelics.
TheDeza ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:46:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I like how the not t-rex never actually bites anything. Those jaws could have killed the the good guys in seconds, but he never actually uses them except to impossibly throw a several ton dinosaur a few meters.
At first I was pissed about that, because I remembered how much I liked the realism in Dinosaur (which still holds up pretty good, even by today's standards), then I realized it was probably an artistic choice. After I thought about it that way I was okay with it, and the art style does help the dinos stand out from the landscape, which is also cool visually.
My animation professor worked on that movie! Fun fact, most of the backgrounds in that film are live action plates, with the dinosaurs and some other elements composited later.
The textures look dated, sure, but honestly, the animations still look great. I think Movies today have the technology handle textures like scales and furs well enough but for some reason, the animations are never as convincing as some of the best the late 90s and very early 2000s have to offer.
Nowadays they new generations of animators rely heavily on mocap and replicating movement from videos. The oldschool guys were classic cell animators and they got the science down to make something move in a convincing and expressive way
YZJay ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 12:47:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not when you don't have any reference material. The point he's trying to make is that old school animators had a more instinctual understanding of movement.
Ironically motion capture looks very stiff and unnatural most of the time. I'd say for films like LOTR the mocap was just used as a framework. Heavy mocap based movies like that train movie from spielberg always get shit on for the unnatural looking animation.
Human movement converted to velociraptor doesn't really translate 100% Whether you think the results look believable to you, is subjective. But once I found out about this extensive use of mocap for non human forms, it explains my issues with the animations in Jurassic World, it feels like it's not polished. A raptor's center of gravity is different to a human who's doing a half-crouch . Honestly, I thought the animations in Walking With Dinosaurs 2013 looked more believable. That's just my opinion of course. I'm the kind of person who is completely taken out of Jurassic World when witnessing a stegosaurus do a full gallop - that thing is bigger than an elephant, and it cannot physically move without keeping 3 legs on the ground let alone gallop like seabiscuit. The scene is half a second long but it annoys the shit out of me. Sorry for the rant, don't know where that came from. I've already typed it in so I might as well save it.
snarpy ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:22:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Right, and that movie didn't work at all because of it.
Meanwhile, I felt pretty attached to the dinos in Good Dinosaur.
The original concept was that the dinosaurs would not talk. But of course they chickened out. Same thing happened to the Walking With Dinosaurs movie in 2013. Of course the real issue for both of these was that the writing was terrible not because of the realism of the art style.
snarpy ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:13:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In my own personal opinion I found the dinosaurs in Dinosaurs really creepy looking, and very hard to empathize with. I did not have this problem with The Good Dinosaur.
Again, personal opinion.
mrbooze ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 14:38:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But the Dinosaur movie (2000) features much more realistic creatures
Do you also complain that the fish in Finding Nemo aren't realistic? The bugs in A Bugs Life?
Realistic dinosaurs was not the goal of The Good Dinosaur. Pixar is eminently capable of realism when it wants to be.
The dinos in the clip you linked look pretty bad to me but I guess it is 2000. The stylised nature of The Good Dinosaur allows it to be simplistic IMO.
Walking with Dinosaurs is what I remember as being awesome. They used lots of practical effects to make it awesome.
[deleted] ยท 67 points ยท Posted at 07:30:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
pigi5 ยท 27 points ยท Posted at 08:31:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Kinda like all those spinoffs involving Mater, right? Right?
Sookye ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:32:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wow, it's the opposite with me. At least visually, I found the T-rexes disturbingly ugly in comparison to the rest of the movie, which looked gorgeous. I wish they had designed them differently.
telllos ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 09:09:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It feels weird, because they move like a horse+ his rider. To make the look more cow boy. I thought it was so great.
Hamakua ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:54:57 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I interpreted it as a young kids imagination recalling a story being told to them from a parent. That's how I took the art style and the clash between the character models and the scenery.
If you wanted to read further into it - The premise of the movie is that the asteroid that presumptively wiped out the dinosaurs doesn't hit. So I took it as a "What if" story as recalled from the mind of a child.
They went overly cartoony with the main character, Arlo. He looked like a coloring book cartoon.
To add, Arlo was one of the most annoying characters in recent memory. I understand that they were trying to portray a timid character who eventually overcomes his fears, but they overdid it by making him overly afraid everything (including fireflies). It didn't help that he kept calling out "papa" throughout the movie, making him that much more of a sissy.
I could be wrong, but I didn't think he was a child. His siblings, who were the exact same age, seemed to be more like teenagers.
Rockburgh ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 11:11:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I believe they were teen-ish, yes. However, Arlo was a teen-ish who had recently seen his father die a horrible death because of his mistakes. I think his behavior was reasonable.
Now, this doesn't mean I like him as a character. I actually found him to be rather annoying... the ranchers and the mother were the only characters in the movie I actually liked. But Arlo's behavior is perfectly understandable.
jarfil ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:15:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He acted more like a scared crybaby all the time. I think I haven't cried out as many times for my mom or dad in my whole life as that thing did in barely an hour and a half.
Not even when your father was killed, you blamed yourself, then had to find your way back home in order to help you widowed mother? Well damn jarfil they should call you the bad ass dinosaur.
jarfil ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:47:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When I was 5, I actually got lost in a foreign city, in a foreign country, barely speaking the language. A native neighbor picked me up in his truck and got me close to the road from where I could get back to where we lived at the time. Didn't cry a single time, for help or otherwise.
My 3 year old loved him though so I guess they did alright by their target audience.
That's the kicker. Much of Pixar's success is predicated on creating relatable characters that also appeal to all age demographics. Arco did not fit this mold.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:48:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep the works for the target audience excuse doesn't really work with Pixar's track record of movies that a lot of parents like more than their kids do.
I actually didn't find his character so annyoing, the only thing that bugged me was his voice or specifically their choice for voice actor. Didn't ruin the movie for me, but i think i would have liked it even better with a different voice for Arlo.
I'm of the opinion it was done on purpose. For what reason I have no idea. I noticed the same thing. The scenery and landscapes looked almost like live filming, where the dinos clearly had a 'cartoonish' quality to them. Perhaps the filmmakers just wanted to ensure the kids didn't find the dinosaurs scary in the least bit. Or maybe they were going for a stark contrast between the scenery and the characters. Really didn't take away from the movie IMO.
Facio ยท 29 points ยท Posted at 07:04:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The film is a man vs nature story, the filmmakers probably wanted nature to be as real and intimidating as possible.
Good point. I didn't have a problem at all with it. I did notice it, and was just curious what I was missing. I figured it was intentional, but that just makes me wonder why even more. Thanks for your insight!
GenSmit ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 09:38:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar works very hard to stay out of the Uncanny Valley. They have the ability to make more realistic creatures but if they do it would be almost impossible to actually buy the story since you'd be spending the entire movie trying to decide whether it's real or fake. Simple models leads to easier and better storytelling.
Still, I was kinda creeped out by the dinos. I came to terms with the design decisions...but I can't be the only one that found them strangely off, and not in a cute way either. Maybe it was the contrast between the characters and the backdrop?
Shit dude, I don't even care. My son loved this movie and that made it great. Besides the fact that it took a dark as fuck turn in the first five minutes, he day calmly (and even awooo'ed at the family) at through it, which was amazing for him.
He isn't saying it isn't good, what he is getting at is that it is nothing new. Complementing this movie for that is hardly something you can describe as being done better or more creatively than previous Disney/Pixar films. Of all the traits of the good dinosaur that I did like the 'dark as fuck turn' at the beginning didn't stick out and was more of a footnote than anything else.
The story was about dinosaurs living much like humans in a world where humans are the animals. I bet they want to keep the dinosaurs simple so we can project ourselves into the characters better. It's especially important to keep them as simplistic as possible because humans also exist, but we need to project ourselves with the dinosaurs more than with the humans.
Disney Animation Studios never touches sequels to begin with. They would never make a sequel for another studio's movie. Their bar for what they make is off the charts.
It's like you have Pixar standing on Mt. Everest and then DAS sitting on the moon.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:49:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well regardless, it just goes to show those are bad movies too (I don't think Planes was Pixar though). Point being if the movie was forgettable, probably wasn't that good.
I think I will forget The Good Dinosaur. I will probably never forget Wall-E which I consider their best film, probably wont forget the Toy Stories either. The rest I am likely to forget, especially ones like Monsters University and Brave and Inside Out all of these I consider to be pretty mediocre.
In fact Pixar has been on a downhill slide for the past 7 or so years with no stopping in sight. Part of it is because I am older and part of it is because the movies have just gotten worse.
It was really popular with critics as well, some of them were saying it might be the first animated film to get a best picture oscar. It's far cleverer than any of pixar's previous work, it's a great film to help kids learn about emotion, the story was excellent, it was very visually appealing. It was heartwarming, insightful and it eloquently handled it's characters.
I know it's just opinion, but your statement that popular opinion can be wrong, while true in some cases, in this case it smacks of arrogance. It seems like you think your opinion is more correct than anyone else's, but you are just some guy on the Internet.
No my opinion is just my opinion. Inside Out did not have an excellent story, the story is an adolescent who moves to a different state and town and learns to deal with it. It is a great film for kids, but so was Cars 2(in fact Cars series is by far the most popular with kids). I found the visuals to be very good, but for 200 million it better look visually pleasing. And lastly its characters were all one dimensional by design.
Inside Out is a great movie if you are a kid or you are watching it with your kid it is one of the few Pixar movies that an adult without children can find hard to enjoy.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:03:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah dude I was just kinda highlighting the fact that OP didn't remember Dinosaur so that should be an indication of it not be too good. The Pixar comment was really just for comparison, wasn't necessarily my point at all.
It seems most CGI movies are going downhill. They all look so uninspired to me with the likes of Disney making these cgi movies with semi realistic looking characters such as Frozen or this Dinosaur movie and its weird no effort dinosaurs. They have lost their charm.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:29:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Even Disney didn't go all out when they did that. They had the dinosaurs talk in Dinosaur. Although I think they wanted them to be silent and Eisner forced them to add voices. That film would be so much better if it didn't have weird voices doing dated references and was more like Wall-E.
mrbooze ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:40:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They had the dinosaurs talk in Dinosaur. Although I think they wanted them to be silent and Eisner forced them to add voices.
jaguar90 ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 08:09:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is probably the most nostalgia inducing comment I've read this year. I wouldn't have remembered this until reading it. Was it that little female triceratops?
[deleted] ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 08:52:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just to mess up your day even more, it was a murder-suicide. Shot in her sleep, then her mother, then he burned the bodies and shot himself in the garage. That family deserved so much better.
TheDranx ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:37:39 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wanna get even more depressing? Her gravestone has "Yep! Yep! Yep!" written on it.
That's an unfair comparison because one could argue that the land before time is a far more visually stylized. Like... have you watched it and seen the characters? This isn't a knock against either film and their respective art direction by any means, I just think you can't expect "Walking With Dinosaurs" when watching a movie about talking dinosaurs.
Yes the landscapes are photorealistic, and beautifully done. But imagine if the dinosaurs were as real and could talk...
champ64 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:53:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, but if the How to Train Your Dragon movies can make their dragons cute while straying away from looking overly cartoony, then so can The Good Dinosaur
Look /u/thisdesignup, right now things are far worse than they were before when Pixar wasn't directed so horribly, so let's dispel with this fiction that Pixar doesn't know what they are doing because they know exactly what they are doing.
Fun Fact: A typical animator can produce 20 seconds of film footage a year. A Pixar animator can produce 30 seconds of footage a year. They definitely know what they're doing.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well sure, but it's not like "overly simplistic blob-creature" and "100% realistic dinosaur" are the only two options. Pixar struck a great balance between the extremes before, such as in "Brave" or "Finding Nemo".
This time I simply feel like they went too far into the cartoony corner for my personal taste and it just looks silly to me. I think what bothers me most is that in their other movies the animals still had believable (though exaggerated) anatomy, whereas here the titular dinosaur looks like a sphere with sticks glued to it and a child's drawing for a face.
The most infuriating part of the movie was how out of place the characters looked. They had an entirely different color scheme and texture happening. Plus, they looked clunky (to me) and didn't move like natural creatures. Drove me crazy the whole film especially considering the intense backdrop that was behind them. It felt like an unfinished product to me. I understand why people liked the movie but I had a difficult time getting past the design factors.
veul ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:31:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
addysol ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:27:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah I felt a little let down by that. Super realistic, gorgeous backdrops but then they just went "ah fuck it. He's a green, blocky looking dinosaur"
sidogz ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:49:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cartoony, yes, simplistic, no. I was really amazed at the depth and detailing of the textures and surface rendering of the characters.
It was obviously a choice to have them Cartoony and not a limitation of ability.
The story, however, lacked any kind of depth. What the hell was the moral point of the movie? If you try hard enough you'll still fail and let your family down. Or was it that pets smell and they belong in the wild?
Yea that was the first thing I noticed. Amazing scenery, but i really didn't like the dinosaur models they used. It didn't seem to fit with the environment and gave the movie a cheap feel.
The whole world is like that though too, it's just lush enough to not notice. That's what I like about Pixar. They manage to have the ABILITY to make fully lifelike scenes but choose not to because it's not necessary to tell the story. It also allows you to not study the background much and be able to focus on the story and the characters... It's just real enough to believe but not so real it's distracting....
I'm thinking they simplified them so heavily because of some of the sheer violence portrayed in the movie. It was honestly kind of brutal at times, if the dino models were as realistic as the scenery... It wouldn't feel like much of a kids movie.
Like maybe I'm wrong, but I'd like to hear why instead of downvotes. To me and from what I have read Dreamworks has always been at the front with technology and animation ability.
Thats because they were added in at the last second. the movie original had no dinosaurs and was titled "The Good Dog" They changed it at the last second because they wanted it to be something that would sell toys. So after EVERYTHING, including all of the audio was recorded, they went in and switched out all the people with dinosaurs.
If you listen to just the audio of this movie, you would never suspect it had anything to do with dinosaurs at all, because when it was recorded dinosaurs were not part of the equation.
what the fuck. that is completely bullshit. Pixar called this movie something like "untitled movie about dinosaurs" before it was titled so it has always been about dinosaurs
That could not be more wrong. One of the leading lighting artists and look-dev members of the team for The Good Dinosaur came and spoke at my school before real production began on this project, clearly stating its title as it is now.
Also, anyone that knows ANYTHING about 3D animation knows you can't just "switch out all the people with dinosaurs" "at the last second". That's not even the same kind of animation rigging. Stop spreading falsehoods.
Peterson andย John Walker announced the film asย The Untitled Pixar Movie About Dinosaurs. On April 24, 2012, Pixar announced that it would be titledย The Good Dinosaur.
They did indeed BUT that was NOT what the movie originally was. The good dinosaur was a different unrelated project that was grafted onto an already finished movie.
Really.... is that why the dinosaurs farm, and raise chickens despite not eating meat, and not having any ability to make tools for farming?
Is that why the audio has ZERO references to dinosaurs at all throughout the entire film, not even dinosaur noises of any type? Or why the human inexplicably only makes dog noises?
This movie was originally an Ol'Yeller knockoff, and had absolutely nothing to do with dinosaurs. But after Jurassic World was announced, that changed in order to get in on that cool Dino toy money. thus "The good Dinosaur" was born, New models were hastely thrown together over the course of 4 years, and integrated into the "The Good Dogs" Backgrounds, and tada...one super shitty dino movie ended up being made that made zero logical sense.
It sounds like a dog, because it originally WAS a dog. It is not that the dinos sound "like" people. It is that they in no way not even once sound anything at all like dinosaurs. If you heard only the audio from this movie you would have never once at all thought that it in any way included dinosaurs in it, because when they recorded the audio it didn't.
you wonder why they were simplistic? they used all their money on backdrops and probably so the characters/dinos stood out due to their poor detail compared to the scenary
CatSoup69 ยท 32 points ยท Posted at 06:57:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What's really cool is they used geospatial data collected by the United States geological survey to render the landscape so a lot of the landscapes in the movie are real or very close to real. I read a really good article about it shared by the USGS Facebook page a while ago but I can't find it now :/
s4in7 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 14:55:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just Google "USGS good dinosaur" and there's tons are articles.
Particular points of interest:
One scene of Good Dinosaur is composed of as much data as the entirety of Cars 2.
The majority of the USGS and Google Earth data focused on translating Wyoming's Grand Tetons to screen.
64,000 total miles of American landscape were translated to screen
NSD2327 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:08:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep. You can find most, if not all, of these landscapes in western Wyoming.
I don't know that I feel that way. I was okay with it. If it had been 100% cartoon style I wouldn't have made it to the end of the movie. And if the characters were too realistic the plot wouldn't have made much sense. I though it flowed really well.
I feel like Pixar have been being even more "cartoonish" recently though. Like, Toy Story is cartoonish. The Grave of the Fireflies is cartoonish. But Toy Story is probably more cartoonish than the Grave of the Fireflies and the Good Dinosaur is probably more cartoonish than either... just the annoying huge eyes and overdone expressions... the Good Dinosaur felt very try-hard in this respect and I thought the dinosaurs looked truly awful.
I think the dinosaurs are a match with other Pixar creatures. Do you have a problem with the characters in Monsters Inc.?
I think the problem is that people can't seem to get over the fact that The Good Dinosaur has cartoonish characters set within more realistic surroundings. It jarred with me initially, but it all started to blend fairly quickly.
Yeah of course Mike has a huge eye, but I don't know - it seems less obnoxious since it's part of his monster quality, and it doesn't seem to emote as obnoxiously as the Good Dinosaurs'. Scully is pretty well-proportioned, in terms of face stuff.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:33:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think it's the lack of any detail that makes the dino look so creepy in comparison. Even if you look at Mike's rather simple face, you still see a lot of subtle things like little color variations, wrinkles, some sharp edges that contrast the bigger smooth surfaces, the way his eyelids crumple when he moves his eye... meanwhile the dino's face is this perfectly uniform blob with two holes poked in it. It not just a matter of being too cartoonish, its more that it looks lifeless.
I think it might be because you are thinking of the cartoon dinosaurs in relation to real dinosaurs without thinking of the monsters in relation to "real" monsters.
If you imagine that the monsters in Monsters Inc. are supposed to be terrifying, their cartoonish qualities are made clear. Sully is supposed to be one of the scariest monsters in Monsters Inc, but he looks like a big fluffy teddy bear.
myhihi1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:29:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
i had the same thought. Not sure if it was the original intention, but having realistic "grown-up" landscapes and cartoony characters worked, making sure the movie didn't drift in one of both directions.
The Amazing World of Gumball does this really cool mix of different animation styles and it's epic, though. The overall design of Arlo and his family was a big part of why I wasn't super into The Good Dinosaur - regardless of how un-textured and neon he was.
I'm not sure I'm against the whole concept, but I found the Dinos in this movie the worst looking characters out of all the Pixar movies. The human-dog was great though.
Perhaps it was based off older styled cartoons? Older cartoons... The Aristocats was a cartoon on a much more detailed background. Wish cartoons still looked like this, that's why I love Studio Ghibli films.
It still blows my mind that this was all made in a computer. It's breathtaking.
ShaneDayZ ยท 84 points ยท Posted at 04:53:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie was kinda meh imo, very much for kids.
CForre12 ยท 157 points ยท Posted at 05:51:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie was even bad for kids. Ask a kid what they thought about it and you might hear "it was good" as a response but you'll never hear them talk about it again for the rest of the day. Or ever for that matter; that's how you know if they really liked it or not
Very true. My daughter is into dinosaurs and couldn't wait to see the film, she'd been talking about it for months, but the second that we finished watching the movie she said it was nice and I haven't heard about it since.
Equeon ยท 108 points ยท Posted at 07:39:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Personally, I thought there would be more about the actual dinosaurs.
The tagline was all about how dinosaurs never died out, and the first scene shows this big farm, built by dinosaurs.
So at this point I'm expecting a really interesting, quality Pixar movie showing a lot of the different dinosaur "cultures" and how they interact with humans.
Instead, I got a pretty straightforward movie about friendship and overcoming fear, complete with Arlo yelling about a hundred different times.
Seeing the other "Dino cultures" like I mentioned: the pterodactyl scavengers, the Tyrannosaurus herders (my favorite), and the raptor poachers were all very entertaining and interesting to me, but these were all pretty brief clearly designed to be little more than pages in the greater chapter of Arlo's adventure.
It was hard for me to believe that this was from the same company that made A Bug's Life and Finding Nemo, two films that (in my opinion) did a far better job of creating memorable characters in a world of talking animals.
Looking into it, the film was reworked a few times and went through two directors before it was made. It was almost destined for failure
foyiwae ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:05:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah I was saying that to my friend after we watched it. I would be far more interested in a sequel where we learn about the different dinosaur cultures. I thought the T-Rex characters were interesting, and Arlo's father was quite good. But the 'adventure' itself was just meh. Even the Storm Chasers was quite a good take on something extreme.
I would have preferred Arlo going to the watering hole the T-Rex's were going to, and maybe meeting more dinosaurs, and how they lived. Would it be like a major place?
It wasn't bad the movie, but it was nothing to write home about personally. It was cute. I guess.
I really had no idea what the movie was going to be about, but I ended up really enjoying it. As much as I loved "Inside Out", I was more emotionally invested in "The Good Dinosaur".
While a healthy amount of world building is appreciated and can add a lot to the story you're trying to tell, I feel like Pixar really excels at stories that use a minimal amount of artifice. Less time is spent being on a tour of this world, and we are able to understand and get to the emotional stakes more quickly. Don't misunderstand me, I think that movies can do both, world building and emotional resonance. It's not necessarily one or the other, but movies, like Up, WALL-E, and the Good Dinosaur, will always have more importance to me.
I guess what I'm saying is, that as much as we would like to see more of the T-Rex ranchers, the weird Manson-Family Pterodactyls, and the raptor hillbillies, they are all just interludes in Arlo and Spot's stories. They are both on a journey of discovery, and everyone they encounter is there to teach them a lesson about the larger world.
I just like the almost wordless exchanges between Arlo and Spot, especially when they tell each other about the people they have lost. Yes, every character has big dewey eyes, but the world is no less dangerous and the grief and sadness are no less real.
And it's a story about a boy and his dog essentially, and I'm just hard-wired to empathize more with that.
They would have just hidden the 2 star review like they did for The Guardian's review of this - Genius!
tonytroz ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 07:07:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's a reason it was pushed back for years. Pretty to look at and the river scene was Lion King-esque, but not up to Pixar's standards that we're used to.
The main characters all look over-simplified, as if they were designed more for the appeal of a potential toy line than for anything else. They just felt... awkward. This is one of the few Pixar movies I really just couldn't find interest for.
In my opinion the "hallmark" of a Pixar film is a film that can tug on your heart strings with little to no dialog, the actions and the expressions express the gravity of the scene. Up had the long montage without a single word being uttered. Toy Story 1, 2, and 3 all had moments where you can feel real resentment and emotions in the voice acting. The stories themselves were also more elaborate. Wall-e basically was just eyebrows moving but it conveyed emotions that were relate-able and easy to pick up on.
But there are also movies that "fall short" of the Pixar hallmark in my opinion. Brave was very bland and "cookie cutterish". It felt like a girl power movie that was made to ride the girl power hype train. Nothing in that movie seemed original nor did it have the Pixar twist. Monsters University seemed like a very poor story without many jokes peppered in, its not the witty writing you expect from Pixar, the witty writing makes it enjoyable for adults and children. Cars 2 felt like a cash grab. Either the Pixar sheen is wearing off, or Pixar has lost quite a few of its writers. The stories and character development isn't keeping up with the technological progress seen in the pictures. The rendering is amaing, but the story and characters are lacking.
Disney's purchase of Pixar in 2006 is where I feel things started to go South. Sure, Cars was already out, and it was blatant cash grab, but I could forgive that to some degree. But if you look at all the movies that came after you can see a noticeable decline in quality. Sure, Up, Ratatoille and Wall-E came out after that, but I imagine those films were knee-deep in development. But around the time of Brave the quality starts taking a noticeable decline (with exception for Inside Out).
None of Pixar's films are bad, but they lack the groundbreaking storytelling and risk that made Pixar what it was seems to have also declined. Their later films are all pretty much "safe".
Pixar's upcoming film list? Cars 3. Toy Story 4. Finding Nemo 2 Dory. Not that exciting. Yet, Disney's 3D team (which Pixar helped build up) has picked up the torch with films like Bolt, Tangled, Wreck-it-Ralph, Frozen, Big Hero 6 and Zootopia. As it is, the Pixar magic transitioned from Pixar to Disney. Pixar is stuck loop if mostly sequels while Disney is knocking them out of the park with almost consistent films from their 3D side.
I agree, there has been a huge drop in story and character development. But leaps and bounds in progress in the technical field, Brave's hair, The Good Dinosaur's background, etc. Its pretty interesting since the majority of the hits are from the famous Pixar Dinner
I do agree though a lot of Pixar's recent films look like a "paint by numbers movie" or a very bland story where the characters don't have much motivation for their actions. Something bad happens? Better flip like a coin. This is why I don't like Ratatouille the characters were very shallow, even the sous chef seemed like a generic female role "oh I'm in a man's world, better be tough".
Kosko ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:17:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't exactly "fun", no songs, death, weird drug scenes, terrifying teradactlyes, scarred TRex good guys, rejecting parents, loses the friend at the end. I don't know how this one made the cutting room floor.
Aw, disagree! My cousin is 7 and obsessed with dinosaurs. Every time I go to see her, she asks to watch this movie with me. I've seen it like four times already, and I only see her like once every six months haha.
The thing that ruined it for me was the kid, nevermind humans and dinosaurs live together, but they made the baby human a freaking fighting machine for no reason what so ever. It was more aggressive than a freaking dinosaur, like come on, just cause dinosaurs didn't go extinct human children are little hulks?
ShaneDayZ ยท 39 points ยท Posted at 05:48:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So is toy story / monsters inc ... They do a great job of appealing to both adults and children.
tonytroz ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 07:08:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar can usually transcend the kid market and also appeal to adults. This was a rare miss, not even a miss like Cars that at least did well with kids and merchandising.
Eh, I really enjoyed the movie. It was sad, adventurous, but fun, and sometimes funny. I liked the plot, yeah it's pretty similar to The Lion King, but I loved the relationship between the main dinosaur and the kid... my eyes got teary near the end of the movie.
Biohaza ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:14:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:47:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
Also, please consider using Voat.co as an alternative to Reddit as Voat does not censor political content.
I posted this on another comment: The most infuriating part of the movie was how out of place the characters looked. They had an entirely different color scheme and texture happening. Plus, they looked clunky (to me) and didn't move like natural creatures. Drove me crazy the whole film especially considering the intense backdrop that was behind them. It felt like an unfinished product to me. I understand why people liked the movie but I had a difficult time getting past the design factors.
TL;DR The directors 4 year old niece designed the dinos?
Exactly, they stood out of the environment in a bad way. But the critters that where cute and funny looking. They fit perfectly, I don't get how after rending a scene they could not see the problem and fixed it before moving forward.
mokopo ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 08:30:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I disagree, tried watching it, and while it looked beautiful, I fell asleep because it was boring. I was actually excited to watch it too, its just....meh.
It's gorgeous. My SO is an animator, and couldn't stop flipping out about the detail in the reflections.
We were sad when it ended because a) the advertising didn't do the film any justice, which means not enough people will see this, b) the people who do watch this probably won't appreciate these kinds of nuances or details, c) it was pretty sad, and d) we'd just watched the most depressing episode of Six Feet Under before putting on this movie, so were already kind of sad. Alas.
We lived out west for a few years, so the landscapes and textures in this film felt very much like home to both of us. As such, I found the score far too Appalachian, which was off-putting, though it conjured the appropriate emotions.
That's an interesting statement considering John Lasseter's quote which essentially states the opposite:
The way the films look will never entertain an audience alone. It has to be in the service of a good story with great characters.
Hydress ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 02:20:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I guess I'm one of the few that disliked it? I felt like they took a lot of shortcuts to make the scenery, it's blatantly obvious in some scenes that the landscape background and foreground are 2D. Example being the scene where the dinosaur first meets Spot. The grass is just pasted over the bottom of the screen, but none of that is actually there when their feet are shown.
They barely interact with their surroundings and the times they do, it looks bizarre. The camera barely ever panned.
If you look for it, you can tell it's just photographs posted onto a 3D object and the tessellation used just doesn't look great either.
Maybe all these flaws are just stick out far more with the simple dinosaur models along side it?
I've always wanted to see animated movies purely to marvel at the skill, even as a kid, but I felt like this was so cheap for Pixar's standards.
Edit: Everyone is backing my argument. Guess they don't see my point. All the images and videos prove my point about photos being pasted onto a 3D object. Have to reiterate that it sticks out to me, therefore I dislike it.
I saw a tech presentation by someone who worked on this film in a supervisory capacity. They went as far as finding actual geographical data for Wyoming and recreating it 100% digitally for their sets. A lot of the scenery you see in this movie can be found in real life. These weren't photographs, the movie is mostly 3D. All the water you see is 3D. Visually, this movie is breath taking.
However, I do feel that while the movie itself looks better than real life, too much focus was put on that while barely any focus was placed on story and characters. This movie felt more like a Renderman tech demo where we watch a dinosaur fall down for an hour and a half. I rank it as the most forgettable Pixar movie.
[deleted] ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 06:55:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I opened both of those images in my two next tabs and when I clicked them I immediately closed them because I was certain I had misclicked and gotten two real photos instead of the real photo and the movie recreation.
They might not look as realistic, but to me there is a lot more effort and creative designs in them. For example that Madagascar one is all hand painted, with animated movies there is this great excuse to do stuff like that, but in live action you can't. Why try to make it look like live action when you can actually make it unique.
It should be noted that animated movies are still very much held back by the computers we have today and a lot of work goes into optimizing the output process to create the visuals you get. It'd be wildly inefficient not to treat the landscape as a matte painting in places, or to pre-render texture images or to render sections separately. It's just part of the process. There HAS to be shortcuts.
It's still entirely created in 3D, just with a few tricks.
My favorite parts (SPOILERS):
1) The scene where the pterodactyls stick their beaks out of the clouds before they attack, looking like sharks.
2)The scene where the Dino and kid trip MAD BALLS.
As a movie though, it was soooo bad. Especially in the wake of Inside Out. The story was monstrously weak and uninteresting, the characters were extremely unlikable and the entire story arch felt pointless.
Sorry to be all Debbie Downer with this, but I speak as someone who was extremely impressed with Inside Out, then watching this movie and feeling like I genuinely wasted my time.
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:42:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I wasn't terribly impressed with either, but I liked TGD more because of these visuals. IO had nice moments here and there, but nothing on this scale.
Oh, I disagree. IO was phenomenal. Psychologically-wise it was FILLED with amazingly crafted metaphors and allegories that never feel forced or phoned in. If you watch that multiple times you'll still be catching shit.
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:35:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You disagree that I wasn't impressed with it or that I liked TGD looks better? :) Personally, I didn't find IO phenomenal and don't feel like watching it again for the next decade. I'd rather watch TGD again to admire pretty environments.
I meant I disagreed that "IO had good moments here and there." I don't mind if you disagree, I'm not trying to convince you. I was just expressing my view of it.
I read a review somewhere that called The Good Dinosaur a tech demo that Pixar decided to release as a movie.
fer_sure ยท 408 points ยท Posted at 02:05:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Aren't all Pixar movies a tech demo at some level? I remember when I first saw a trailer for 'Brave', I thought that Pixar was throwing down a "so you think you can do Scottish landscapes? THESE are Scottish landscapes" gauntlet to DreamWorks, as a response to 'How To Train Your Dragon'.
Unfortunately, 'Brave' was actually a hair modelling demo.
I don't think so. The Good Dinosaur is generic and uninspired in a way that Pixar's other lesser films are not. The stories they wanted to tell pushed them to advance their technology, but this time it seems like they didn't know what they wanted to with the story.
RedofPaw ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 07:58:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They changed it more than once, even throwing out the entire voice cast before release.
I think perhaps they had a different script and idea and half way through production had to trash it because it just didn't work, so in the end settled on the safest of all possible options just to get it out the door.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 08:33:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
RedofPaw ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:46:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Huh strange. I thought the premise of 'what if the dinosaurs hadn't died out' was left over from earlier ideas. Now it sort of seems tacked on for marketing purposes.
red-bot ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:16:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This. They also changed hands of directors midway in production. (Bob Peterson to Peter Sohn.) I've also seen some concept artwork from some artists who worked on the version of the story that got scrapped for a short time. It looks like at one time it had more of a dinosaur/human living closely together ending. I would have much rather seen that ending :/
[deleted] ยท 104 points ยท Posted at 05:23:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I skipped that one. I saw Cars, though, and it's a real story told with specificity and passion. I don't like every film Pixar has put out, but none of them felt like a half baked product thrown into theaters.
[deleted] ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 08:36:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Sinner13 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 14:26:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Except without the funny
Tralan ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:29:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was PG rated Doc Hollywood. It was the mostest unoriginalest of them all.
The underlying story of Cars had as much to do with the death of American cross-country travel culture, the towns that depended desperately on that culture for survival, and what their fates usually were once the interstate system was built as it did Lightning McQueen's racing career and character development, really.
People were way too quick to dismiss that movie as toy advertising bullshit... which it was, obviously, but there was a lot more too it under the shiny plastic surface. The hopeful ending always made me think more than a little of how Who Framed Roger Rabbit? ended, what with mirroring real-life events but with a happier outcome than reality actually gave us.
It'll never be one of those Pixar films that I rush to show my kids or anything, but it deserves more credit than it gets.
I liked the setting for Cars, but didn't feel it helped the overall story. The characters all felt overly stereotyped and it fell into almost every common trope EXCEPT the setting. I think the backstory/concept for Cars was pretty interesting, but the world the cars lived in and plot of the film fell flat.
That said, I give Pixar insane amounts of credit for being able to localize Cars for foreign audiences.
danc4498 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:45:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
While I never did like either if the cars movies, my 3 year old fucking loves them, so I've watched then more times than I can count. I've grown to appreciate them.
Unlike The Good Dinosaur I enjoyed Cars 2. Sure, it wasn't great, but there was enough going on in the film that I was entertained. The Good Dinosaur had nothing going for it besides being pretty, and I'm more like to watch Cars 2 again than The Good Dinosaur.
It's been described as their first flop. My guess us it has more to do with trying to release two movies in a year. They tried that with Toy Story 2, and had to scrap about IIRC 2 years of work and redo it with their A team.
I guess they don't have enough crazy talented people to be two Pixars yet. Also, Lasseter seems to be off with Disney - probably having the time of his life. I thought Feast was amazing.
myhihi1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:33:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm guessing Disney pushed them on Cars 2 so that they could release more merchandise.
I agree. The good dinosaur was first movie I ever walked out of. The scenery was absolutely beautiful but the dinosaur models were very meh and the story/dialogue was something you would see in a Sunday morning TV movie targeted at 2 year olds. I normally love pixar movies but they really dropped the ball with this one and I can't understand how this got a 77% tomato score.
When I first heard of the premise for this movie, which was basically "what if dinosaurs didn't go extinct" at the time, I thought it was going to be a movie about a world where dinosaurs took over human roles. So you would have dinosaurs in offices and dinosaurs as farmers and shit. Like Cars but with dinosaurs. I think that would have been a better movie.
A dinosaur western is a genius idea. Two of my favorite things growing up were cowboys and T Rex dinos.
tonytroz ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 07:10:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can tell the idea could work on some level (the T Rex scenes were pleasant and the river scene was devastating on a Lion King level) but that just wasn't enough to carry the movie.
While it wasn't a terrible film, it missed that... Involvement you had with the characters, things just felt a bit random, and in a predictable order. It was a very by the guidelines story and characters, sure some moments were sad, but anyone can be brought to tears with good cinematography and fitting music.
It looked amazing, the trailers were amazing, but the movie definitely fell very short of the expectations.
What?! How to train your Dragon are Skandinavian landscapes in a fantasy world. I loved both movies and I am willing to admit that Brave looked way better but that doesn't invalidate the story and characters.
I really like Brave, personally. I dunno why people hate on it so much.
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 10:22:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Zuerill ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:04:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The focus of Brave was always gonna be about the mother-/daughter relationship. It may have been advertised to be a different thing but that's mostly why I don't watch trailers for anything anymore. As such, I really liked the movie, it has instantly become my favorite.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:06:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Zuerill ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:34:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As far as I know, Brenda Chapman was the one in particular who wanted the movie to be about the mother/daughter relationship. Although I'd say it's clear pretty early on that that's what the focus is on, I don't think that 15 minutes pass until they get into the argument of finding a suitor.
In that case, Witcher 3 was a tech demo for hair! No story there, just them sweet sweet hairs.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:52:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That hair is awful.
Molomar ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:09:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be fair, Ho to Train your Dragon is a much better movie than Brave.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:54:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And a successful hair modeling demo at that. I would kill to have that hair (though red wouldn't be my color).
YZJay ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:10:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Toy Story: The one that started it all.
Bugs Life: Soil?
Monsters Inc: fur tech. (Notice how Sully's the only one with hair?)
The Incredibles: I think it was skin.
Finding Nemo: Water.
Ratatouille: Subsurface scattering.
Cars: I think it was reflections or some form of lighting.
Brave: Hair physics.
Up: Cloud rendering.
Monsters U: Global Illumination.
That's all I could think of.
[deleted] ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 08:25:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I agree, it was not a 5 star movie. It succeeded at being a simple enjoyable story. I am not sure why it gets so much hate, there is a lot of garbage released at the theater that is not worth people's time. If you have kids, and they like dinosaurs, they will love this movie.
I might be the only person that would put this on par with Inside Out. I felt that IO was a great idea that was only very slightly explored, and featured a lot of easy or lazy decision making and overly-convenient characterizations (characters often responding to scenes as required to move the plot forward rather than how they might actually respond).
The ending also felt like a supreme deus ex machina, wherein they whip together some magic to cross the giant pit that seemed so insurmountable throughout the film. The last scene with the look in all the minds was one of the most enjoyable in the film, as was the husband/wife dynamic, which was spoiled in the previews.
Inside Out has only become richer and smarter and more moving to me as I've processed and revisited it. There's more going on in any random scene inside Riley's mind than in The Good Dinosaur as a whole. It's not a terrible movie, but it does feel slight, in spite of some genuinely impressive visuals.
I don't consider that a deus ex machina because it's of a piece with how Joy and Sadness overcome obstacles throughout their journey.
This is how I've been for the most part. I walked out of it finding it underwhelming, but as I've processed and contemplated, and revisited, I've since decided it's deserving of its critical acclaim.
While the plot is basic and (I too thought it) was resolved too suddenly, everything else is more complex than I first saw.
Tralan ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 06:30:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the Bus Driver all had variations of Anger that just exploded with everything.
i_706_i ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:36:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
(characters often responding to scenes as required to move the plot forward rather than how they might actually respond)
How I felt about Big Hero 6. It got a lot of praise and for a kids movie it's fine, but I wouldn't put it on the level of great story telling as some of Pixar's work.
I actually preferred it to Inside Out. Inside Out was funny and all, but it didn't really move me as much as The Good Dinosaur. Plus, the whole "lost-far-away-from-home-and-gotta-get-back" journey story was my cup of tea.
VMoney9 ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 03:03:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I could buy that. The plot is kind of "Black sheep son gets lost and has to find his way back. Shenanigans ensue," which I realize is basically the plot of of every Pixar movie, but this one just isn't as good.
vadrotan ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:15:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie is a real turd, especially by Pixar standards.
I kind of think it's a turd ONLY by Pixar standards. I really really loved it and many elements of it, but after watching it, I couldn't believe it had been a Pixar movie because it didn't have the same narrative ingenuity. It was just a regular kids movie, getting a lost [insert animal here] getting back home. It does that really well, but for Pixar, that's a pretty lazy story.
Pixar is an amazing studio. I feel like there were a bit more amazing before the Disney buyout. Too many sequels now. But I digress.
You're half right. Pixar's main focus is story telling but they also aim to challenge the limits of CG with each new effort. As a result they develop a lot of technology.
Here's a page of the research papers they've published over the course of making their movies:
One of the things I love about the CG industry is that is has this great focus on development. Whenever someone or some studio makes something awesome it's always "Yo! Check out this awesome thing! Here's how I did it!" rather than "Our company is the sole proprietor of awesome. Don't even think of mimicking our awesome or our legal department will tear you to shreds."
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:10:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
justlike james cameron avatar
snarpy ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 08:25:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A tech demo that absolutely destroyed me about half way through. I was in tears.
The end of the film doesn't hold up to this sequence (as per a lot of Pixar stuff) but holy shit.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:14:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That final scene with Spot and Arlo...fucking onions man.
Lobonaut ยท 168 points ยท Posted at 07:25:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
One of the animators visited my school last year, and paused at this http://i.imgur.com/2ziRc2y.png during the trailer. It was a 1.5 second cutscene of just the tree branches...."This was a concept shot that took us about a total of 1000 hours to do"
Probably more like 25 people, 1 week (40 hrs). At least that's what I tell myself, since I work as a programmer. In reality it was probably 12 people working 1 week ~80 hrs.
At that point, you have to wonder if someone thought to just find the highest resolution camera they could and just go and record some branches in the rain.
YZJay ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 13:16:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Modelling, animating, rendering, emphasis on the rendering.
mrbooze ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:45:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
On a tour of Pixar's data center I was on years ago, I was told that they're basic goal with computing power is to have enough such that an animator could send a job to rendering at the end of the day and it would be complete when he came back in the next morning. When they started to reach a point where they couldn't reliably achieve that, it was time to upgrade the server farm.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:01:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I love art, but at some point there is an amount of work you can put into it where it's not really impressive anymore. That's over 40 days, over twice that if you do it during work hours only (assuming 12 hour days. Gotta love animation).
dearhero ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:03:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wouldn't it be so weird to step into that world and find there's no actual wind or temperature. All the sensations are muted yet it's one of the most beautiful places you've ever seen. I'd trip balls.
Wilcows ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 13:17:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No offense. But anyone could do that with free software even. I've seen similar results in tutorials and shit. Maybe not animated but it's not that special.
A thousand hours is really easy to rack up too. Got a team of people to divide the hours over plus rendering time for every attempt. Sure it looks nice but I don't really get what they are on about
Care to share the free software title with access to this nice of shading/lighting. These shots are phenomenal all the same.
Wilcows ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:35:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For example you can use blender. And here's a random tutorial of something pretty similar to the still of the movie technically wise. http://youtu.be/jBjlsSHBLPs
If he put some more time into it he would've made something on the same level I'm sure.
IDK I haven't seen the movie, I kinda lost interest after Brave I am waiting for Zootopia or Incredibles 2 they look promising.
Wilcows ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:56:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I haven't seen it either. I'm purely talking about that still and what OP said Pixar said about it.
Not much interest to watch this movie either but if I stumble upon it on tv one day I'll watch it.
droodic ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:22:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm assuming it's more an approximation of how long it took to render that scene. Idk much about it but I'm guessing for extremely high resolutions it can take a very long time to render
Wilcows ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:20:37 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was an artistic decision. The dinosaurs were meant to look like they didn't belong.
[deleted] ยท 61 points ยท Posted at 05:41:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well, they certainly achieved that. Considering that decision is at a deeper artistic level than most other elements of the movie, and that their appearance was disappointing compared to the landscapes, I wish they hadn't made that choice
ricerobot ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 16:27:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also, Arlo's design is just horrible. I don't remember any dinosaur with feet that look like they're being melted to the ground. Or his wonky ass knee joints that are 2x larger than his legs. Or the way he walked. Everything was just wrong.
I guess sticking him amongst that scenery was also a bit jarring. Sort of like seeing gumby in the Planet Earth documentary.
I mean they could have made him closer to the triceratops character and it wouldn't have been as bad. He was also fairly cartooney but didn't feel so out of place.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:39:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't that extreme, considering some of the environments were a little cartoons, but sometimes it came close
The probably is many people think it was a bad artistic decision.
It being an "artistic decision" doesn't just make it ok. Anytime.
Beaun ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:28:43 on February 19, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
More than likely it was a marketing decision, easier to sell recognizable 'cartoony' dinosaurs than it is realistic dinosaurs that you can find anywhere.
RedofPaw ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:53:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well, if you get too realistic with CGI humans, you run into the uncanny valley and viewers, in short, don't like it. Even the good Pixar (and Dreamworks) movies deliberately make the humans cartoonish and less real than they could. It's a balance you strike.
RedofPaw ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 10:44:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They're dinosaurs.
Meanwhile the people is not the style but the disparity between character and scene.
Avestier ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:49:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No, it was so they could sell more toys that resembled the characters better.
felipcai ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 11:58:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think if they made them look realistic then they'd come out like with live action animals that talk with their mouths moving. Making the dinosaurs look cartoonish saved them from that.
Yes, exactly. It was like two people were in charge of the movie and one person wanted it to be grim-survival-boy-and-his-dog and the other wanted it to be a campy-buddy-comedy-western-travel movie. And they had to compromise and both tried to keep the best parts and had to sacrifice crucial set up type scenes.
TL;DR: It was a conscious decision to make the dinosaurs look like they don't belong, to echo the whole premise of the movie (what if dinos didn't go extinct?)
My son loved the movie, it was a good movie, who am I to judge/care?
PeacePP ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 10:30:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm pretty sure it was mentioned somewhere before the movie came out, I remember reading an article that I'm almost sure was about it.
PoshVolt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:00:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well the movie was complete before it came out. They knew people would point it out and decided to address it before putting it in theaters. Damage control.
mrbooze ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 17:39:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why? What possible reason do they have to give a shit about making up a trivially falsifiable story? They've conscripted the 600 other Pixar employees into keeping this terrible secret because for some reason one of the greatest animation houses on earth couldn't figure out how to animate realistic dinosaurs?
There's been a lot written about their decision and their thought process. Quite before the fact. For you and everybody.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:00:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That decision would have worked, if the movie actually was about why dinos don't belong, and the film was then about returning the world to what we think it should be.
The asteroid missing was a mere background premise for the film to explain why the dinos are still around. Continuing that theme into the film design was a mistake.
Yeah that whole article is just pure bullshit. The real reason is that they already had a finished movie called "the good dog", and they went in and swapped out all the character models later on with dinosaurs instead of people.
Molomar ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 10:12:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That sounds incredibly false.
I remember reading an article about all of Pixar's next movies, and it predicted them all including Brave. The only one that didn't go through was Newt cause Rio was pretty much the same plot.
And on that list it was still called The Good Dinosaur.
Tralan ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 06:28:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fuckin' T-Rex cattle herders galloping like they were riding horses... I fucking lost it. Best scene in the whole movie. And the crazy mountain man with all the pets.
It isn't perfect, but it was visually beautiful, the character relationships were very realistic (especially the portrayal of a farming family), the realistic danger of nature and the few comedic moments were pretty great IMO.
It felt a bit like a Studio Ghibli film in regards to focus on nature and quiet scences without the need for constant dialogue, even when it's being funny (eg the gopher scene and the fruit scene)
I thought the movie was funny and cute. My girlfriend and I went watch it and we both loved it. Didn't realize most of Reddit strongly dislikes this movie.
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:17:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the movie, my only problem are the character design but i guess for kids the characters are lovable
I can see why someone wouldn't like it, but as someone who doesn't expect much from Pixar, this was honestly quite good.
EntoBrad ยท 164 points ยท Posted at 03:09:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the film. It was simple, beautiful and pretty relaxing to watch. Plus that poor guy just had a shit time. Everything went wrong for him. Most cartoons kids have bumps and scrapes, but he kept falling off cliffs and waterfalls. It was almost sadistic.
Sea-Salt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:37:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, I think they wanted to balance out the cartoonish designs of the characters by just beating the everloving crap out of Arlo at every turn. Just wanted to give the poor guy a hug after a while.
smikwily ยท 40 points ยท Posted at 04:47:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My mom usually doesn't watch Pixar movies, but went with us as it was my son's first movie. When it was over, she asked me how much of the movie was made with computers.
It truely is a beautiful movie. The small filler/bumper shots of rain on leaves, etc and the closing credits just left me slack jawed. I always love seeing the small advancements they make and how that adds to future movies for Pixar. Fur, then wet fur, then Merida's hair. Light, then ambient light (glow into the dark Buzz), then the translucency of water in Nemo.
Watch Toy Story again and see where they started (or Tin Toy, etc.) and watch for their pushes per movie. I'd almost like to see a "remaster/re-render" of Toy Story 1 for an anniversary release. Don't go all Lucas on it, but just fresh paint/fur/light all around (and maybe fix that Buzz/car track loop hiccup ;)
All off their little advances make for some really cool big things.
THRlLLH0 ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 06:25:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes completely re-doing the visuals for TS1 is a waaaaaay better idea than making TS4 after they concluded it perfectly.
The advancements in Computer Graphics (and more specifically in rendering) are truly amazing. It is an absolute joy each year to read the new papers presented at SIGGRAPH and at Eurographics (and their Symposium on Rendering). We've finally reached a moment in which new technologies make their way to the big screen in just a few years, whereas at it took 30 years before path tracing could be used in movies. Can't wait to see what the future holds for the industry.
Buzz's wings would have hit the racetrack when he entered the loop and when he exited the loop. Since you only see him before, during, and after, it wasn't really an actual on screen blooper.
Just one of those animation blips that some noticed. Doesn't interfere with the movie itself, but makes your brain hurt a little bit ;)
[deleted] ยท 252 points ยท Posted at 00:55:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Its a shame they spent so much effort in landscape visuals instead of dinosaur design or script for the matter. I love pixar movies, but boy was it a letdown.
Well that one wasn't exactly postponed on purpose...
champ64 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:00:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The visuals were stunning, but yeah the script ruined the movie for me. Inside Out gained much more praise because it was actually a good movie, script and visual wise.
myhihi1 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:36:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also Inside Out had some amazing cinematography.
isestrex ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:50:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The opposite is true. They spent way more on script and story, and they went through several re-writes and even a director change. The end result was a story that never worked no matter how much effort they put into it.
The landscapes are just the natural progression of that particular department doing better and better each film.
Spoiler One of the most depressing movies i have seen. He fails his dad, he gets his dad killed, he fails his mom and gets swept away in the river. It just keeps getting more and more depressing
RedofPaw ยท 89 points ยท Posted at 07:55:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, but he made it home in order to continue being a burden on his family, so at least he managed that.
[deleted] ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 10:01:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He did, however, get rid of the critter which was stealing most of their food.
brangaene ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 10:17:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And it was his sole task which he eventually finished.
Yokurt ยท 24 points ยท Posted at 09:46:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I always expected some kind of happy end, where the dinosaurs he met during his adventure somehow help to make the farm less work. Like using the buffalos to plow the field or the bird guy using his "collection" in some way.
But it's just "he fell in the river and came back", with the fear of starvation still being present. Weird.
epwnym ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 13:46:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Then you really weren't paying attention. When he first gets home and is walking wise and tall towards his mother as a silhouette, she first calls out the father's name. She mistook him for the role model he idolized. Arlo left a child and returned as a grown man who was now ready to run the farm.
Yokurt ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
towards his mother as a silhouette
I ain't no farmer, but how much work do this them there silhouettes git done?
I think the idea was that after everything he'd seen he would be more capable of providing for his family. He became significantly more physically capable during his trip, and overcame most of his psychological issues as well.
dakky123 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 08:06:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the saddest scene is when Spot his explaining his situation in the sand. It was so calm yet sad at the same time.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:46:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was crying so hard. Just that silent expression of grief. It was so powerful.
Then you're in for a treat. In the movie the dinosaurs were farmers and it was just so fucking weird.
Equeon ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 07:49:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They also kept domesticated oviraptors, which for some reason acted just like chickens. Ironically, those dinosaurs would've probably been way smarter than the walnut-sized-brained sauropods.
Here's a picture of the main character carrying their crop (CORN) to their silo.
Yes, CORN, millions of years before it was genetically engineered to look like that, in completely the wrong type of region. And the T-Rexes were ranchers. Visually stunning, but I had my 'wtf' face on for the whole movie.
Don't bother watching it. The movie is a turd by pixar standards.
KeenBlade ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 06:26:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a strange movie for me. The animation was probably the best I've seen yet, but the movie itself was oddly bland. It really didn't leave the impact that Pixar normally does. It's by no means bad, but it's not really amazing either.
BLAND, yes that is the perfect word for this movie. It was like someone mixed Ice Age and Land Before Time and White Fang all in one movie and then took out all the parts necessary for the plots to have any impact.
Loathe this movie. Farming dinosaurs? A main character that denies his friend a chance to meet his family because his quest isn't done yet? One screen writer and what, like seven other additional writers? "The good dinosaur" like the good book. Praise Jesus. Nice visuals, reducing your children's intelligence plot. Did I mention farming dinosaurs?
Equeon ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 07:53:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And at the end, he puts his mark on the silo right next to his mom and dad's marks. What exactly did he do to deserve that? Find his way home after getting lost on his own accord?
I just loved the scene where he stated why he wanted his mark, and then two lines later say it's stupid and he doesn't want his mark. Clear character there folks, totally consistent.
Some say it was his survival that was his "something big" that earned him the right to put his mark.
Others say that his assigned task was to get rid of the critter that was eating their corn. He did it, so, mark earned.
tocilog ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:21:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a decent children's movie that didn't do a lot of sugar-coating. The mark was to signify growth which Arlo did at the end of the movie. Life is hard, growth doesn't mean solving all your problems but gaining the ability to face it. Also, surprisingly a lot of death and killing. Anyway, not Pixar's best but still a good children's movie.
Hedhunta ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:22:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pretty sure the island in the middle of the river is the island from a bugs life. It looks the right shape and the trees are in the right place and look young and thin compared the old and thick trunks of a bugs life........ could be wrong though Pixar is known to do that kind of stuff.
bionix90 ยท 66 points ยท Posted at 01:39:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs look pretty atrocious and the story is lame as hell though.
Equeon ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 07:50:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I would have preferred a film just based off the lives of the T-Rex herders, in a true western style.
Like Rango, but with dinosaurs.
I think you are the one with the line opinion here. Everyone else thinks the story was kinda meh.
pdmavid ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:56:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't think every Disney/Pixar movie needs to be intellectually stimulating for adults and have toy story quality plot lines. It wasn't Frozen, Brave, or Wreck it Ralph quality, but my 4 year old enjoyed it and I was fine with it. At least it wasn't fucking chipmunks.
champ64 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:08:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I doubt that a 4 year old would care for great visual stimulation either though. The thing is Disney/Pixar have built a reputation of creating pieces of work that are enjoyed by both adults and kids alike. Obviously a kid will enjoy the movie regardless of plot line or realistic visuals, but the adults have a certain expectation usually. Quality is quality, no matter what audience you're going for. Kids enjoy the chipmunks movies too, btw.
pdmavid ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 17:16:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree and have those same expectations. However I know not every movie can be the pinnacle of movie making and I don't think the good dinosaur was that "atrocious" or "lame."
8483 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 08:54:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This movie was amazing. I actually like the discrepancy between the gorgeous landscapes and the weird cartoony dinosaurs.
I love how everyone complains about the character design being stupid while every review on IMDB is bitching on the fact that the movie was scary as fuck to kids.
I laughed so hard when the pterodactyls "saved" the cute fox. I also really liked the meth raptors. The best WTF moment was the hallucination part.
Plot and design? Well everybody commented on that, I agree with most. But I watched it after too many drinks and such with buddies, and it made it so much better. We were in complete awe at the landscapes and soundtrack too.
DrunkCried like a little bitch too at parts, and you know which ones. Toys Story 3 didn't even do that to me, yet the ugly dinos managed somehow
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:43:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Honestly the movie would be better if it were just an hour and a half a peaceful CGI backdrops and maybe some relaxing music.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 06:48:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I remember the big fuss everyone made about A Bug's Life.
How revolutionary it was to have each blade of grass moving on its own.
Yeah life was simple back then. Back then when you heard a Pixar movie was coming out you knew it was going to be good... sigh
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 15:49:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The artstyle to this movie is such a mess, like someone really pushed the boat out on the landscapes which are photoreal but then the characters look like absolute ass.
Gives it such a strange uncanny valley feel, like the opposite of the polar express
Definitely not my favorite Pixar movie ... hell, it's not even in the Top 5 for me, but worth watching for the scenery alone. Some of the most beautiful visuals I've ever seen in any movie.
How does DreamWorks get away with it... Oh yeah, HD Textures. I liked this movies but I can't deny Pixar's character texture techniques are sorta dated. Compare How to Train Your Dragon or Rise of the Guardians, which had Character Models that were cartoony, but still had enough detail to not look like a Unity Asset Flip.
Lyerak ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:21:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenery is so wonderful it's upsetting to see such talent be wasted on poorly thought out dinosaur designs. That's not to say I've watched it, but I've seen enough screenshots of the movie to tell that it isn't something I'd be interested in putting up with. Although, the screenshots in the link make me want to rethink that decision. Purely for the sake of the background art. I'd bet they would have received a LOT more revenue if they would have just put a little more effort into the actual dinosaurs.
rae919 ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 03:51:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw this movie with my daughter and I thought it was very cute, surely not as good as Toy Story, but really, what is? I think the dino's animation sucked though, seriously. Disney's Dinosaur looked lightyears ahead of this movie and it was almost two decades ago.
edit, spellcheck is bollocks
aocom ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 05:35:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
tonytroz ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:15:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw this movie with my daughter and I thought it was very cute, surely not as good as Toy Story, but really, what is?
Pixar has at least 6 or 7 movies on Toy Story's level, including the sequels. Sadly this movie seems like a flop just because they set the bar so high. This is closer to Cars 2.
DRL21 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 04:57:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I know! One reason why I have no interest in seeing this movie because the dinosaur animation is soooo bad and cartoony when the landscapes are photorealistic.
It's honestly beyond me why such gifted animators opted for such a silly carroonish design for their dinosaurs. I mean jeez, the Land Before Time had better looking dinosaurs.
Pixar created Renderman which is one of the most licensed 3D renderers out there. They created the engine that renders the photorealistic looks that other FX houses create. Creating their own films wasn't what the company was originally created for. Create created creating crate ate.
I thought this was part of the reason why the movie was....weird for some reason.... The background was hyper-realistic and the dinosaurs looked like happy meal toys...
Mtwat ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:10:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Most of these landscapes were based on places in Wyoming. I've actually climbed Ship Rock which is in Hyattville/Medicine Bow, for example. If you truly want to visit or live in such a place, all of it exists, and some of it is as empty and vast as the pictures portray. I grew up in Wyoming and I've never found anywhere else nearly as beautiful.
Mtwat ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:52:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'll keep that in mind. Seriously I want to live somewhere where I feel like I could fall into the sky.
I saw the first Pixar short- the one with the light- at a film festival in 1986. Luxo Jr. I really loved it and it always stuck with me. I thought of it every time I saw a similar desk light. I thought it was the best stop motion animation I'd ever seen. A light that had feelings! So cool.
Took me until 2005 to realize it was computer generated and the same as THAT Pixar. That took my breath away. I saw a glimpse of the future and had no clue. Those people are genius, so far ahead of their time.
SexCLexy ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:29:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So my sister and I just finished watching this movie.... The detail in the backgrounds were amazing ... At one point I even said I wanted to go swimming in there lol.
But I couldn't get over how much it reminded me of The Lion King
I said it in another comment, but most of these places really exist! If you have the money to travel to Wyoming, you can literally experience these all for yourself. Most are from the Yellowstone/Teton areas, but there are a few plucked from the Big Horn Mountains, the flatlands, and I'm sure that some of those are Black Hills as well. Wyoming is one of the most beautiful places in the country and it's almost completely untouched by man. I strongly recommend visiting!
Oddwin ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:37:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually for the first time ever felt really let down by a Pixar film. I felt it was way too predictable, formulaic, and just plain lazy.
Thought the stoner triceratops had me lol'ing. The rest of it just left me with a weird empty feeling.
I also noticed that there was a LOT of full on killing and it was very brutal killing.. seemed out of place.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:04:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
Also, please consider using Voat.co as an alternative to Reddit as Voat does not censor political content.
You know what else is amazing about this movie? The soundtrack! It's such an evocative score that makes it really feel like a classic Western. "Homestead" and "Run With the Herd" are my favorite selections that show how powerful the movie's soundtrack is.
The Good Dinosaur is an underrated movie. With its breathtaking landscapes, an iconic score, the clever Western motif, and a plot that doesn't pull any emotional punches, in my opinion the movie doesn't get enough credit.
ttstte ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 03:46:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked this movie more than anything Disney has released in the past 5 or 6 years.
Sea-Salt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:47:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not to put down The Good Dinosaur (I really enjoyed it), but seriously? Out of Tangled, Wreck-it Ralph, Frozen, and Big Hero 6, not one of those has impressed you? Disney's come a long way with their own 3D offerings since crap like Chicken Little (it helps that both Pixar and Disney's animation studios are now run by the same guy).
aerodeck ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 02:06:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Gorgeous movie with way more feels than I expected.
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:18:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
modern children movies/cartoons/shows TLDR: unexpected feels everywhere
Totally not related, and I haven't seen the film yet. But I just asked a girl if she'd go see it with me tomorrow. Wish me luck.
EDIT: well boys, she says has Spanish homework and a basketball game. But she would love to reschedule. Looks like I'll be staying home and watching Bob's Burgers instead. Maybe I'll order some pizza.
Don't listen to the hater. It's a great movie to see in the theater for the visuals alone. Story may not be the best from Pixar, but it beats the hell outta most of the major studio rehashed garbage we get.
Most likely less. A lot of game engines today are trying to recreate Pixar and Disney's rendering tech in real time. I'd say in about 10 to 15 years Console games will look like this and run decently. PC games 2-5.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 10:01:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Drop dead gorgeous film. Highly recommended for visuals alone.
nem012 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:20:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Real world seems boring now. T_T
NooMoahk ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:20:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
These scenes were mostly copied from actual geological data. You can visit most of the places in real life; they're mostly copied from US national parks. Except you can't see them from many of these angles because the parks banned drones.
nem012 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:22:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wooow; Only been to te U.S. once. I can see now that there is a lot more to love.
Thanks for providing the info and that awesome link!
P.s.: I was planning on visiting Yosemite & know now to get a permit from "the associate director for Visitor and Resource Protection."; +1 for the heads-up! =)
NooMoahk ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:43:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie starts off as if the meteor never hit Earth, so the dinosaurs never went extinct.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:06:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs missed the earth. dinos now live along with more modern animals. even though that makes no sense because dinosaurs would just kill of modern animals. buuut.... its just a silly pixar movie so its not a big deal.
The meteor never hit earth. They show you that and the assumption you have to make is "what if dinosaurs didn't go extinct?" in order to justify a movie where man and dinosaurs exist at the same time.
THANK YOU. Ive been wanting to show off this movie to everyone who didn't get a chance to see it and its just a gorgeous movie, even though the plot was mostly blah.
I told so many friends/coworkers to go just for the backgrounds. Just won't be the same on a smaller screen and they really were worth sitting through the plot for (plus Spot was cuter than expected. Maybe it's cuz I'ma dog person?). None of them listened to me though (and we work at the cinema, so it would have been free).
The landscapes were incredible with the production team paying very close attention to detail; the kind of stuff you don't necessarily notice, but would notice it's absence. I found this video clip very telling.
ETA- I don't see why all the hate on the story. It is a movie that is meant to be viewed by children so they're not going to give you some overly complex plot that kids are going to be asking "why did he..." "what does this..." every five minutes. Even with that, they manage to tell a pretty good story albeit very sad. I teared up more than once, and if a cartoon can make a grown man cry, I'd say it was pretty effective.
The dinosaurs look pretty atrocious and the flow was a snow physics demo.
moxy801 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:24:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pretty but do not jibe with the character designs at ALL.
HlfNlsn ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:35:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Absolutely stunning visually, but The Good Dinosaur was my least favorite Pixar movie ever. I didn't like the story, and there were some scenes that were so un-Pixar-like that it pulled me out of the movie.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:45:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It bothered me that there was so much inconsistency between the dinosaur designs and the buffalo and birds and shit.
Even between dinosaurs and lizards. The lizards are very realistic.
nolamb ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:46:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was genuinely unsure if they used real landscapes and added the CGI stuff later. I remember watching the trailer and getting enthralled by the quality of the dirt on the ground.
Ewaan ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:18:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I went to see this film and honestly thought Pixar had shot real world locations and added CG models on top of those landscapes.
benhww ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:29:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs really spoilt this movie!
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:44:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just watched this again after seeing this post. Manly tears were shed.
Unpopular opinion: I actually really enjoyed the film. It wasn't Pixar's best by a long shot, especially compared to Inside Out, but it was still enjoyable and better than some of the other stuff they'd put out as of late.
Bladamir ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:29:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ten years ago you could look at Pixar movies and dream about when video games would look like that. That gives me a crazy amped feeling about these images.
Late to tris thread so this will never be read, but I found the plot to be a bit insulting. The dinosaurs farming, humans living alongside, the accents all mid western red stater. It all struck me as being crudely creationist and going after that market.
Probably going to get a bit of hate for this. In my opinion, I really felt that the scenery and the very odd artistic choice for the dinosaurs were quite visually spectacular. But its seems that they spent too much of the budget on the visuals instead of a solid writing team. Not to the standard which I would have personally expected from pixar, but each to their own I suppose.
kenoxite ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:36:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Even better, a lot of it is inspired after real things. I think it was set in Wyoming. The mountains he heads for (three peaks) look almost like a range I can see from my parents house called sawtooth mountain. Many of the other settings look super wyomingy too
I don't have a particular interest in The Good Dinosaur, however seeing these shots, I just realised how much I'd enjoy a BBC/Planet Earth-like movie (complete with Attenborough) visualised by Pixar.
Why the movie looks blurish in the big screen? I just went to a shitty place or that's how it works? First time I saw it in 3D didn't notice. But I went to see it again no 3D and it was so blurish.
This is the only reason to watch this movie. The movie itself is not one of their best. I was surprisingly disappointed. It was like it was written by fans of Pixar rather than Pixar writers.
I'm hoping this is just a test run for them and their next movie will reclaim some of that Pixar magic.
The animation and scenery were gorgeous though.
Teid ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:01:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The visuals of this movie made it worth it. The story felt oddly paced and not very well executed but I was also seeing this movie with friends so that might have devalued it a bit. Still a gorgeous movie and worth it for just the visuals alone.
As a huge Pixar fan TGD was a bit of a disappointment to me, but the artwork more than made up for it. I'm still trying to work out whether some of the introductory shots (such as in the 2nd/3rd images) were fully CG or reality, or some kind of composite mix of both..... Truly stunning.
chepnut ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:34:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenery looked so real that when the dinosaurs were on the screen it looked super fake. It's as if they used footage from a planet earth type series and just slapped cgi over it
fer_sure ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:43:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think Pixar has discovered the inverse of the Uncanny Valley.
puftich ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:37:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Worst Pixar movie since Cars. And Cars at least sold a fuckload of merchandise. It's like they took a story about a cowboy kid getting lost in wild west and just turned the characters into dinosaurs and humans into dogs for some reason.
Pitty it's all ruined by the terrible looking dinosaurs
Peabush ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:35:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watched it last night. Great visuals. But the story was lacking in some way. I especially thought the ending was too quick. "returns, sets his mark, fade to credits"
Not pixars best, it is somewhere around a bugs life and monsters university.
The 2nd image clearly is Beartooth Butte Formation, WY. The entire movie is based on actual USGS data of the northwest. Pixar reconstructed 64,600 square miles of North America.
Speech500 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:54:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
That sounds like something they would do. Almost all Pixar movies seem to be set in America, yet they're still one of the better animation studios when it comes to diversity in setting. It's almost admirable that they set it in America before America even existed. They must really like America.
Some are for sure, like Toy Story, Cars, The Incredibles, Inside Out and Big's Life and now The Good Dinosaur.
But a lot are set in other countries. Ratatouille is in France, most of UP is in South America, Finding Nemo is in Australia, Brave is in Scotland, Cars 2 is all around the world.
Also, a big part of Wall-e is on space while the other part we are not sure if it's in America. The same for Monsters Inc (looks like they can open doors all around the world).
Eh, Monsters Inc takes place in America if America had monsters instead of people. Especially Monsters University, which takes place in what is basically an exact replica of an American university.
I liked the movie. The landscape was so realistic that the dinosaurs themselves felt out of place. I wondered if there is ever going to be a movie like 'dinosaur' again. That was for me the ultimate dinosaur based movie with a good mix between visual and story. Especially with the computer power we have now compared to back when it was released (in 2003 or something)... I just wish some director took a shot at it.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:09:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why can't video games look like this yet?
Buck1286 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:17:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They could if they were all cut scenes like the order 1886. With the best most expensive computer you can build, you can actually play some games that look close to this.
bukithd ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:12:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a pretty good movie but enjoyed the cg here more than avatar
ArtGamer ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:12:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
this movie was a visual orgasm too bad the character design was so mediocre :/
It cracks me up when people act like Pixar dropped the ball by making the dinosaurs cartoony. Like some how they ran out of time making the scenery so they cut corners on the dino designs. It was a stylistic choice. It was on purpose. You don't have to like it but don't act like it was laziness. Nature is that antagonist in the movie and they wanted it to look photorealistic. They wanted to make chracters like Arlo child-like. I really enjoyed the movie. In no way was it one I would rewatch for years to come like Toy Story but it had a good (though rehashed story) that was entertaining.
As much as I wanted to like the movie, I just couldn't seem to bond with the characters/story very well. I loved the gorgeous scenery/visuals though. I can't quite describe what didn't work for me.
s4in7 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:56:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Technically, the movie's a stunner. Some interesting facts:
One scene of Good Dinosaur is composed of as much data as the entirety of Cars 2.
The majority of the USGS and Google Earth data focused on translating Wyoming's Grand Tetons to screen.
64,000 total miles of American landscape were translated to screen
More backgrounds than any Pixar movie before are actual geometry rather than matte paintings.
I think the dinosaurs were made to be toys, simple and easy to push out. They can make better dinosaurs without getting too serious just look at Rex from Toy Story.
jackwald ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:22:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
These are great, especially the ones with water. Really makes me want to go watch this movie, even if just for the animation
I mean what do you expect when you have control over every little leaf and piece of rock? Which actually makes compositions look too forced some of the time.
The dinosaurs looked so cartoony, which is obvious considering its Pixar, that they really stood out and clashed with the realistic look of the animated world. It kinda didn't fit together and kept me distracted through most of the movie.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:26:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar Universe MMO please.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:34:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Beautiful CGI! It's a shame the dinos were so dorky-looking and the plot was so bad.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:43:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Anyone complaining about the contrast between the realistic backdrops and cartoon characters needs to realize that's something Disney has been doing since Snow White. Gorgeous backdrops, with cartoon characters. Check out Sleeping Beauty -- this is over 20 years after Snow White, and really brings the point home, truly a pop art masterpiece. And that's what Pixar is doing, I suppose it could be labeled as pop art in a sense.
It's not the same. In Sleeping Beauty, the contrast between characters and the background is not so high. Even Pixar did it before in Ratatouille. Paris is almost realistic while the characters are pretty cartoonish. The difference is exactly the "almost". They did it in the exact measure.
In Ratatouille, Paris is very detailed, but it doesn't look like a picture. You can tell for sure it's not a live action movie. The same happens in Sleeping Beauty. Could be very weird if Disney used a real photography with the Sleeping Beauty painted over it.
But in The Good Dinosaur, the background is perfect like the real thing. If you put a real actor on it, you can't tell it's CGI. But the characters are very cartoonish. Maybe even more cartoonish than in Ratatouille. So the contrast is much high. The contrast in TGD is comparable to Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:30:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I still think it's comparable. It's about level of detail. The characters have less detail than the backdrops.
If you see the credits, they have a lot of specialists. Damn, they even have two "volumetric clouds artists". Yeah, you can have a graduation in Creative Arts, Visual Effects or something like that, but I'm pretty sure many Pixar's artists are pioneers in this area. They basically practically invented it.
I took a 70 year old man on the edge of senility to see this movie. He loved it, but we got into an argument as to whether or not the dinosaurs were inserted into real footage. To prove that they were, he got out some National Geographic magazines and pointed at the photos. I gave up after a few minutes of this, but damn they made realistic landscapes.
All the scenery compositions fit in a few consistently repeated categores - based around diagonals from corner to corner of the screen. It starts with a lot of one of those diagonals and then switches to the other direction. Then we get lots of center horizontal compositions, and then a set with jagged teeth, and other various patterns. The effect that causes is really interesting!
I was so let down when I saw the dinosaur models. All of the enthusiasm the trailer had built up died as soon as I saw how cartoony they looked. It totally took me out of the world they'd created, that was a terrible design choice.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:51:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eventually graphics will get good enough that someone will finally create a world that is sufficiently realistic such that no one else will ever have to create one again. Everything will be placed in that world.
lordzelo ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:58:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
15, when it starts to rain, was one of my absolute favorite shots in the movie. It was done so beautifully.
bdAZ77 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:17:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Too bad the dinosaurs wrecked this movie. Character design in this one was just awful and ruined it for me IMHO.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:25:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just saw this movie. It felt like an animation showcase more than a movie.
nomnaut ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:49:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm more of a Land Before Time child. Saw it in the theater. Not ashamed to admit I cried. Multiple times.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:51:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I love how you can't pinpoint the exact locations, but any American would automatically recognize the world as modeled after America. The sunset seen through the wheat grass especially has that American Midwest feel to it.
Beautiful renderings, it's a shame the same effort wasn't put into the story.
You can. The 2nd image clearly is Beartooth Butte Formation, WY. The entire movie is based on actual USGS data of the northwest. Pixar reconstructed 64,600 square miles of North America.
Ptizzl ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:51:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I stayed through the end credits just for the scenes like this.
My kids liked the movie. I didn't like it so much, which is sad because I have a lithograph of every Pixar movie in my office. I did, however, love the visuals. I will watch it again just for the sheer perfection of the landscapes.
I was so excited for this movie. I was a total dinosaur nut as a child (I'm 36 now), and I love Pixar so much.
But this movie was just terrible. The script felt like something they whipped together over a lunch meeting, and then someone got a 5 year old drunk so they could design the characters.
The visuals for this movie were so good that I felt like it would have improved the entire movie if there was no dialogue. Tell the entire film through the actions of the characters. I think they could pull it off.
Pritzker ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:58:50 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I watched this movie this weekend. The landscape is absolutely fantastic. The story definitely has it's Disney influence (as opposed to pure Pixar), but the setting in the film was absolutely jaw-dropping. "Magical" might be the best way to describe it. Pre-historic magic.
It takes place millions of years after the extinction level event that killed the dinosaurs, except in this movie that event never happened. The land has been cultivated by dinosaurs.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 03:02:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Is literally every shot in this movie a landscape? I mean damn that's a lot of scenery. From what I've seen of the characters, they don't really fit with that pseudo-real style.
mrbooze ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:43:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The character design intentionally clashes with the landscape.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:01:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Interesting. What other animated films have done this? Not to sound suspect, but have they said that? Seems to me they could have been going for more of an updated Dinosaurs look and shifted halfway to the happy meal toy look they ended up with. Keep in mind this is Disney we're talking about.
mrbooze ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:47:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Q: You have a central character who doesnโt seem to fit the rest of the environment, both physically because itโs unfamiliar to him, but visually as well. Heโs cartoonish in a way that you wouldnโt expect from a movie thatโs surrounded by photorealism. I was wondering, during what part of the process was that decision made?
A: It was made pretty early on. The story went through sort of an evolution, and by the time Pete [Sohn] came on, he had been involved with a lot of the designs of the characters, and we basically decided that the characters were going to be younger, and pretty much based on that research trip* we went out there and decided that nature would be the antagonist. And so we talked about trying to stylize nature more, and it just didnโt feel as threatening as you would want. We have a couple of big natural phenomena that occur that are sort of devastating, and if you have a stylized look I just donโt believe you would think it was as threatening. And the other big stylistic choice with the design of the character was we wanted him to feel like he didnโt fit in, and that he didnโt belong out there, so that was really what drove those two choices.
Thank you for posting this magnificent slideshow. It was like going to the American Museum of Natural History and a gallery-show of N.C. Wyeth or Maxfield Parrish.
Haha :-) It's funny that the movie is about dinosaurs because Earth was so desolate when they were alive and now we have computers that can recreate their existence.
It was a strange movie for me. The animation was probably the best I've seen yet, but the movie itself was oddly bland. It really didn't leave the impact that Pixar normally does. It's by no means bad, but it's not really amazing either.
Overall I thought the movie was pretty terrible, the only enjoyment I got out of it was the constant realization on how far CG has come in the last 20 years. Except for the characters they all looked like stuffed animals.
Watched it a second time just to make sure I actually did think it was a great film. And yep, its very good. Theres a lot of people who won't see it and call it terrible because of the cartoony Dinosaurs and then comparing the models to Disney's 2000 film Dinosaurs which in comparison look very dated. Also (thats not the kind of look they were going for)
If thats the only reason why you won't watch this film then I think you may over analyse it if you every do watch it. Its not a film about how the character models look. Its a film about fear.
Seriously its worth seeing, its not complex like Inside Out (not comply like hard to follow) But its still a great film. I actually preferred it to Inside Out and it may have been my favourite film of 2015. Its just a lovely film.
calittle ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:33:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just saw this movie last night. I agree that the landscape visuals were nothing short of amazing - I had to look very hard for clues that the Dino's weren't composited onto stock footage. (Ok not that hard but it was really impressive). I'll echo the sentiment that it's not Pixar's best story line - maybe because we've seen it before and it feels rehashed and atypically morose for Pixar all the way through. You could perhaps try a plot line comparison against Up! and I'll bet they're pretty similar.
muttenxd ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:43:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
FiveThirtyEight's podcast What's The Point did an episode on how they used real geographical data to model the landscapes in The Good Dinosaur. I thought it was really interesting.
On pic 15, they even left in some chromatic aberration on the bokeh, a color-distortion effect caused by a physical lens not being able to focus all colors on one convergence point.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:46:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought they were photographs.
My kids are gonna have some good looking video games (no kids yet).
The resolution of these images are 1920x808 px. To print a poster you have to use a resolution of 150dpi, so your poster could be 32.51x13.68 cm. It's pretty small.
Maybe Disney at some point will have a 4k resolution of this, but could be easier to find pictures of these real locations.
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but it's from a movie named "The Good Dinosaurs" and I'm showing only the landscapes with no dinosaurs because it's beautiful and the dinosaurs are cartoonish.
dimpe ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:40:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This movie reminded me alot of Yellowstone. F.ex Mammoth hot springs and then Grand Teton being the Clawtooth Mountain.
But ye, the visuals is crazy good!
I loved it. The story is VERY sad, so if you're expecting a light-hearted laugh-fest, don't. I think that's why people are bashing the story so much. I typically like my cartoons to NOT make me feels. This one does.
I'm guessing they're bashing it because it's sad for no reason. It's manipulatively sad. The same people bashing it would likely highly recommend both Up and Finding Nemo, both of which are really sad movies that make you feel.
This is sad in a very forced, immature way compared to Up and Finding Nemo. The plot is also extremely scattered.
Some of these images look absolutely photo realistic, but most of them look just slightly unnatural, and I can't figure out why. They're almost perfect, but there's just something that still says its CG. Is it the lighting? Are the colors too saturated? Are some of the models too perfect? As an artist, I'd really like to know!
I have a background on my computer that's nearly identical to image 54 except mine looks less realistic. I took mine about a decade ago at a friend's farm with my first digital camera.
AMLRoss ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:06:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some of it is photorealistic. Cant wait for 4k bluray.
reekys94 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:25:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Honestly the movie would be better if it were just an hour and a half a peaceful CGI backdrops and maybe some relaxing music.
Wehbula ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:37:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Movie was so boring. Nothing happened. Pixar should shut down.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:45:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw this movie with my disabled clients and planned on falling asleep, but was actually just in awe of the amazing landscapes that looked exactly like the wilderness I have explored in utah my whole life.
[deleted] ยท -7 points ยท Posted at 00:17:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can like something while acknowledging that it shouldn't be highly rated. The film is really boring. The jokes fall flat, the ending is terrible. The message is jumbled.
I was really hit by the trailer because the moment he hugs Arlo is so sweet. But that's as far as the film brings the audience emotionally. That gave us just a taste of the amazing possibilities of expanding on that relationship. but the film fails to do that.
It is visually stunning, but the worst Pixar film since Cars 2.
cwagz ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 02:26:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He gets to make his mark on the silo simply because he didn't die. Beautiful movie visually but the story was not great.
More than that - if the movie's logic is consistent, he may have condemned his family to die. They discuss, more than once, the importance of him getting home to bring in enough food before the first snowfall. He returns after the first snowfall, so presumably they didn't bring in enough food to survive the winter...
[deleted] ยท 3241 points ยท Posted at 05:54:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
visvis ยท 748 points ยท Posted at 09:00:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You must be Where's Waldo world champion
Aetherite ยท 38 points ยท Posted at 12:40:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nah, he missed all the microscopic dinosaurs. Runner-up at best.
TT454 ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 19:41:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
*Where's Wally.
Goeatabagofdicks ยท 99 points ยท Posted at 08:00:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That.... Well, uhhh... That looks like a good dinosaur. The official statement will be it's "swamp gas", but we know what it is. We know.
alderaancruiser17 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 16:31:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I want to believe
mrbooze ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:36:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's clearly the planet Venus.
4arc ยท 186 points ยท Posted at 07:43:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was expecting to see the image with the caterpillar but this is hardcore dinosaur material too.
Nestromo ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 16:12:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was expecting to see the dinosaur tail from This photo
[deleted] ยท 120 points ยท Posted at 09:12:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tyrannosaurus Rekt.
sharknado-enoughsaid ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:49:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The proper use of this term
HCJohnson ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:02:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It looks more like a brachiosaurus to me.
Rather_Unfortunate ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 12:20:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not to mention all these!
pekingduckdotcom ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 20:07:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Look at all those...
TardigradeFTW ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:59:49 on February 27, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Look at all those chickens!
WildLudicolo ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 14:08:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thank you! Came here to point that out.
Ikinoki ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 08:26:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There is also another one on the waterfall
SodlidDesu ยท 377 points ยท Posted at 06:52:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sheet negro, you got him. Praise be to you and Papa Bless.
Lateralus_316 ยท 151 points ยท Posted at 06:58:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Soflo'd
Kasc ยท 88 points ยท Posted at 09:38:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
OP should be playing chess, not checkers. Peace out.
mr_popcorn ยท 44 points ยท Posted at 10:01:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm not gonna lie, this is totally me during the Jurassic era.
toilet_guy ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 12:02:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
K-T extinction (GONE SEXUAL)
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:05:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Fooguruu ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:28:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Look at some videos from h3h3productions on YouTube, specifically ones about SoFloAntonio, to get caught up
knofle ยท 56 points ยท Posted at 08:20:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dinosaur in lush forest (GONE SEXUAL)
ancientfutureguy ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:50:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
(click)
SodlidDesu ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:22:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Gone sexual, gone prehistoric, gone JERSEY LOCAL 304.-
s4in7 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:39:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's so weird seeing h3h3 stuff outside of the sub everywhere now. A couple million+ videos recently and they yuuuuuge
orlanderlv ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:58:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sheet negro...that's all you had to say.
slapded ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:46:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dino in the house
Just_A_Coffee_Shop ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:35:52 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sheeet negro, that's all you had to say.........AAAAAAAAAAND I'm rewatching Pulp Fiction
Athrul ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 09:20:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
You've probably just killed us all.
ParadoxZerg ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:56:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That was a good read!
mosehalpert ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:45:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What did I just read
TheOnlyBongo ยท 37 points ยท Posted at 06:28:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's not a dinosaur, mate. If you zoom in you can obviously see it's an all green grass hut with a rather big chimney. Get your shit together man.
[deleted] ยท 391 points ยท Posted at 07:10:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Damn_Croissant ยท 133 points ยท Posted at 07:20:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
fuckin rekt
thisdesignup ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 08:10:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Pun City!
maybe_I_am_a_bot ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:12:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But why?
thisdesignup ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:17:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Because.
crazyaschris ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 08:21:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tyrannosaurus Rekt
InterimFatGuy ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:10:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
D-fuckin'-stroyed
therealcarltonb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:33:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wow, the dinosaurs look so shitty in comparison to the landscapes.
MilkManEX ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:09:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm sure that juxtaposition is 100% intentional, but I really don't understand why.
jarfil ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:20:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Still looks like a green grass hut with a rather big chimney... and two eyes painted on the top.
NotTheBrightest1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:40:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Got a little garden out back, too.
roobens ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:31:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's clearly a weather balloon.
guntygoo ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:37:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
yeahhh! what a prick!
SandyVajaynay ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:08:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is clearly a hoax... perpetuated by bored adolecents trying to scare locals into thinking dinosaurs are real! In similar fasion to the yeti, bigfoot, and crop circles! Besides, as any attendee of Liberty University would know, the earth is only 5,000 years old... I hearby dub this link - Fake and gay.
Gonstackk ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:19:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A red circle.
bykkja ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:39:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Maybe he meant (no dinosaurs) as in (no spoilers)
"please don't post dinosaurs, guys. I'm not ready"
babolix ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:46:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also one in picture 10 about to eat the berries.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:47:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
OP is a PHONY!
jim_the_joke_man ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:00:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think r/jailbait would have disagreed that's considered a real dinosaur.
smokeydesperado ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:33:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Triggered
ItIsTaken ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:46:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He said no dinosaurS, he's allowed to have one. source
smokecat20 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:24:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
OP is a faker. Hey guys OP is a faker!
lickmitaint ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:39:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Irrefutable proof of bigfoot right thar.
Yog_Kothag ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 07:01:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Skyrim?
aufdie87 ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 13:37:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Shots fired
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 13:41:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I still don't see it.
Dewritos ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 14:16:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I want to believe
Anonymous_Snow ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 14:22:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Hahaha, have an upvote!
Portgas ยท 944 points ยท Posted at 00:13:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie is worth watching for amazing visuals alone.
[deleted] ยท 732 points ยท Posted at 01:39:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
SacramentoChupacabra ยท 346 points ยท Posted at 05:53:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Probably didn't want to make the dinosaurs too scary looking. But that T-Rex looked like John Wayne. He was awesome and intimidating.
Absay ยท 244 points ยท Posted at 07:08:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
But the Dinosaur movie (2000) features much more realistic creatures. I remember the "Carnotaurus" thing was awesome. For The Good Dinosaur I wouldn't have expected the same dinosaurs or even the same level of realism but they ended up looking extremely simplistic.
edit: typo. I'm not saying The Good Dinosaur should have been (necessarily) more realistic. I'm saying that not making it more realistic because it could have scared kids is stupid since Dinosaur had much more cool-looking dinosaurs and I don't remember that movie scaring anyone.
Farfignougat ยท 94 points ยท Posted at 08:24:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Loved this movie when I was a kid. Still looks great over a decade later. That's really something especially considering the state of CGI back then.
[deleted] ยท 46 points ยท Posted at 09:15:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
On closer inspection it has some flaws. I got the bluray, and there's some problems, but it is pretty good given the year it was released. The key to how good it sometimes looks is the fact that the movie uses real backdrops for nearly everything, though that is a double edged sword as the dinos sometimes contrast poorly.
Xciv ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 15:34:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Animation has way more to do with creating realistic movements than fidelity. You have 80s-90s anime with tiny hand-drawn flaws all over the place, but Cowboy Bebop is still one of the best animated shows in the medium because of how the characters move and the interesting direction of all their movements (no talking heads in that show).
In the same vein 3D animation will always be outpaced technologically, but movies such as Dinosaur are still perfectly fine and watchable because care was put into every movement of the dinosaurs. Even if the textures aren't up to modern standards, the actual animation is, and that's what matters most.
An example I like to bring up is Polar Express, an animated movie that cared too much about looking good in the wrong places. Everything looked great, except that the faces weren't animated enough, so everyone felt like a block of wood. The technology that went into that film were cutting edge, but the animation will simply not stand the test of time.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 00:59:24 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Well you are correct, but I think even more important than the animation is the shading. Take this for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBqM2ytqHY4
The animation is incredibly unrealistic, but the model still looks like it's actually there. Why? Because the shading is really good. Shading is what causes CGI to fail or to exceed.
Dimzorz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:12:06 on April 9, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well that's only true on some things because using that (funny as hell) late for meeting clip as an example, the person in that video looks much more like the environment than that car. So there you have to consider, what makes the difference, is it the shading, lightning, textures, etc.
BillygotTalent ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:30:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It also has an amazing ride at Disney's Animal Kingdom.
turtlespace ยท -10 points ยท Posted at 09:34:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Really? Never watched it as a kid, and it looks pretty awful to me.
Picklelol ยท 130 points ยท Posted at 07:36:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
holy shit you just hit me with the nostalgia too hard man this movie was the shit when i was 7 or 8, i don't remember when i watched this but i was 7 in 2000 lol
imakefilms ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 11:04:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
lol
DiethylamideProphet ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 11:17:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh man I remember this movie... I had it on VHS. I remember how emotionally attached you were to those movies when you were a kid. The scene where the meteor struck was intense as hell.
As an irrelevant side note, I feel almost as if when you were a kid, things were "psychedelic" to an extent. When I watch these old scenes many years later, they feel the same as watching something which I watched on LSD a while ago. It's a very odd feeling. Maybe when you were a kid, your brains' "presumptions" of things are not fully developed, thus making things appear overly intensive and oddly exciting, just like on psychedelics.
Thugzz_Bunny ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:36:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A lot of things you experience as a kid is the first time experiencing it.
TheDranx ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:31:37 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That meteor scene is still super intense.
K4SHM0R3 ยท 26 points ยท Posted at 08:47:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Carnotaurus.
Devilhead2 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:51:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
cranberryotaurus.
yomandenver ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:22:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cran-appleotaurus
TheDeza ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:46:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I like how the not t-rex never actually bites anything. Those jaws could have killed the the good guys in seconds, but he never actually uses them except to impossibly throw a several ton dinosaur a few meters.
Morningbaconrape ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:40:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Those Carno's were fuel for my childhood nightmares.
Rndmtrkpny ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:17:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
At first I was pissed about that, because I remembered how much I liked the realism in Dinosaur (which still holds up pretty good, even by today's standards), then I realized it was probably an artistic choice. After I thought about it that way I was okay with it, and the art style does help the dinos stand out from the landscape, which is also cool visually.
MintyFreshNipples ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:39:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I have a feeling they specifically didn't want their film to look too much like that one. Whether that was a good or bad decision is up for debate.
Danger-Wolf ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:31:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Loved that movie. I just wish the atmosphere was better. It was too bland to look at.
shaun3000 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:39:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That movie was such a disappointment. This was what was initially previewed: http://youtu.be/BbeLV9KD6-4
A year later and it's the same plot as Land Before Time.
Epic_Spitfire ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:18:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My animation professor worked on that movie! Fun fact, most of the backgrounds in that film are live action plates, with the dinosaurs and some other elements composited later.
GodofIrony ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 08:26:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
aw man, this movie did not age well at all.
rod_munch ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 09:54:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The textures look dated, sure, but honestly, the animations still look great. I think Movies today have the technology handle textures like scales and furs well enough but for some reason, the animations are never as convincing as some of the best the late 90s and very early 2000s have to offer.
therealcarltonb ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 12:42:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nowadays they new generations of animators rely heavily on mocap and replicating movement from videos. The oldschool guys were classic cell animators and they got the science down to make something move in a convincing and expressive way
YZJay ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 12:47:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wouldn't mocap be more realistic?
MintyFreshNipples ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 13:39:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not when you don't have any reference material. The point he's trying to make is that old school animators had a more instinctual understanding of movement.
therealcarltonb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:34:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes, when you look at the still frames, the movements are extremely exaggerated, but it looks very fluid and pleasing when animated.
therealcarltonb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:38:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ironically motion capture looks very stiff and unnatural most of the time. I'd say for films like LOTR the mocap was just used as a framework. Heavy mocap based movies like that train movie from spielberg always get shit on for the unnatural looking animation.
rod_munch ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:48:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Human movement converted to velociraptor doesn't really translate 100% Whether you think the results look believable to you, is subjective. But once I found out about this extensive use of mocap for non human forms, it explains my issues with the animations in Jurassic World, it feels like it's not polished. A raptor's center of gravity is different to a human who's doing a half-crouch . Honestly, I thought the animations in Walking With Dinosaurs 2013 looked more believable. That's just my opinion of course. I'm the kind of person who is completely taken out of Jurassic World when witnessing a stegosaurus do a full gallop - that thing is bigger than an elephant, and it cannot physically move without keeping 3 legs on the ground let alone gallop like seabiscuit. The scene is half a second long but it annoys the shit out of me. Sorry for the rant, don't know where that came from. I've already typed it in so I might as well save it.
snarpy ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:22:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Right, and that movie didn't work at all because of it.
Meanwhile, I felt pretty attached to the dinos in Good Dinosaur.
rod_munch ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:43:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The original concept was that the dinosaurs would not talk. But of course they chickened out. Same thing happened to the Walking With Dinosaurs movie in 2013. Of course the real issue for both of these was that the writing was terrible not because of the realism of the art style.
snarpy ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:13:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In my own personal opinion I found the dinosaurs in Dinosaurs really creepy looking, and very hard to empathize with. I did not have this problem with The Good Dinosaur.
Again, personal opinion.
mrbooze ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 14:38:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Do you also complain that the fish in Finding Nemo aren't realistic? The bugs in A Bugs Life?
Realistic dinosaurs was not the goal of The Good Dinosaur. Pixar is eminently capable of realism when it wants to be.
ZombieJack ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 17:37:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinos in the clip you linked look pretty bad to me but I guess it is 2000. The stylised nature of The Good Dinosaur allows it to be simplistic IMO.
Walking with Dinosaurs is what I remember as being awesome. They used lots of practical effects to make it awesome.
[deleted] ยท 67 points ยท Posted at 07:30:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
pigi5 ยท 27 points ยท Posted at 08:31:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Kinda like all those spinoffs involving Mater, right? Right?
melbecide ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:00:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
LETS BURN THIS CANDLE!!!
Sookye ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:32:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wow, it's the opposite with me. At least visually, I found the T-rexes disturbingly ugly in comparison to the rest of the movie, which looked gorgeous. I wish they had designed them differently.
telllos ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 09:09:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It feels weird, because they move like a horse+ his rider. To make the look more cow boy. I thought it was so great.
Hamakua ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:54:57 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I interpreted it as a young kids imagination recalling a story being told to them from a parent. That's how I took the art style and the clash between the character models and the scenery.
If you wanted to read further into it - The premise of the movie is that the asteroid that presumptively wiped out the dinosaurs doesn't hit. So I took it as a "What if" story as recalled from the mind of a child.
atmosphere325 ยท 52 points ยท Posted at 07:13:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They went overly cartoony with the main character, Arlo. He looked like a coloring book cartoon.
To add, Arlo was one of the most annoying characters in recent memory. I understand that they were trying to portray a timid character who eventually overcomes his fears, but they overdid it by making him overly afraid everything (including fireflies). It didn't help that he kept calling out "papa" throughout the movie, making him that much more of a sissy.
ask-me-about-my-cats ยท 130 points ยท Posted at 07:25:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He was a child. I don't think it's fair to call a child a sissy for acting scared and wanting his dad.
atmosphere325 ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 07:38:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I could be wrong, but I didn't think he was a child. His siblings, who were the exact same age, seemed to be more like teenagers.
Rockburgh ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 11:11:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I believe they were teen-ish, yes. However, Arlo was a teen-ish who had recently seen his father die a horrible death because of his mistakes. I think his behavior was reasonable.
Now, this doesn't mean I like him as a character. I actually found him to be rather annoying... the ranchers and the mother were the only characters in the movie I actually liked. But Arlo's behavior is perfectly understandable.
jarfil ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:15:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He acted more like a scared crybaby all the time. I think I haven't cried out as many times for my mom or dad in my whole life as that thing did in barely an hour and a half.
thisNameIsSooClever ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 17:40:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not even when your father was killed, you blamed yourself, then had to find your way back home in order to help you widowed mother? Well damn jarfil they should call you the bad ass dinosaur.
jarfil ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:47:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When I was 5, I actually got lost in a foreign city, in a foreign country, barely speaking the language. A native neighbor picked me up in his truck and got me close to the road from where I could get back to where we lived at the time. Didn't cry a single time, for help or otherwise.
Badass you say? Well, maybe.
Slither_savvy ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 15:04:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Kids aren't afraid of fireflies. As a kid I was intrigued by insects.
ezone2kil ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 07:26:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah I thought his Papa! Papa! Routine overly annoying too.
My 3 year old loved him though so I guess they did alright by their target audience.
atmosphere325 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:33:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's the kicker. Much of Pixar's success is predicated on creating relatable characters that also appeal to all age demographics. Arco did not fit this mold.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:48:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep the works for the target audience excuse doesn't really work with Pixar's track record of movies that a lot of parents like more than their kids do.
CrunchyCorpse ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:21:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually didn't find his character so annyoing, the only thing that bugged me was his voice or specifically their choice for voice actor. Didn't ruin the movie for me, but i think i would have liked it even better with a different voice for Arlo.
mr_popcorn ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:03:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sam Elliot needs to do more voice over work. His voice is very soothing.
isaristh ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:47:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Too scary? Because the whole "the storm provides" gang wasn't scary enough? Honestly I felt that movie was trippy as hell, literally at some points.
GenericUsernameofAwe ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:35:06 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Someone told me that Pixar was trying to make Nature the true antagonist, hence why it was very real compared to the dinosaurs.
It shows you, hey, something can be very dangerous, but also very beautiful and real. Like a blattorwort.
roadrunner440x6 ยท 53 points ยท Posted at 06:33:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm of the opinion it was done on purpose. For what reason I have no idea. I noticed the same thing. The scenery and landscapes looked almost like live filming, where the dinos clearly had a 'cartoonish' quality to them. Perhaps the filmmakers just wanted to ensure the kids didn't find the dinosaurs scary in the least bit. Or maybe they were going for a stark contrast between the scenery and the characters. Really didn't take away from the movie IMO.
Facio ยท 29 points ยท Posted at 07:04:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The film is a man vs nature story, the filmmakers probably wanted nature to be as real and intimidating as possible.
roadrunner440x6 ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 07:10:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Good point. I didn't have a problem at all with it. I did notice it, and was just curious what I was missing. I figured it was intentional, but that just makes me wonder why even more. Thanks for your insight!
GenSmit ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 09:38:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar works very hard to stay out of the Uncanny Valley. They have the ability to make more realistic creatures but if they do it would be almost impossible to actually buy the story since you'd be spending the entire movie trying to decide whether it's real or fake. Simple models leads to easier and better storytelling.
Rndmtrkpny ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:30:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Still, I was kinda creeped out by the dinos. I came to terms with the design decisions...but I can't be the only one that found them strangely off, and not in a cute way either. Maybe it was the contrast between the characters and the backdrop?
SodlidDesu ยท 28 points ยท Posted at 06:40:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Shit dude, I don't even care. My son loved this movie and that made it great. Besides the fact that it took a dark as fuck turn in the first five minutes, he day calmly (and even awooo'ed at the family) at through it, which was amazing for him.
TheSandyAgen ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 07:09:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I loved when they started hallucinating off that rotten fruit
mr_popcorn ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 10:08:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They showed drug use in a freakinโ Pixar movie. It's a brave new world out there folks!
Thugzz_Bunny ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 14:38:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lol watch the original dumbo
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:45:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just watched it for the first time and thought i was tripping the fuck out when that scene started
ericelawrence ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 07:00:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Disney movies kill people early.
SodlidDesu ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 07:07:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And that's not good how?
absolute_imperial ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 08:06:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He isn't saying it isn't good, what he is getting at is that it is nothing new. Complementing this movie for that is hardly something you can describe as being done better or more creatively than previous Disney/Pixar films. Of all the traits of the good dinosaur that I did like the 'dark as fuck turn' at the beginning didn't stick out and was more of a footnote than anything else.
SodlidDesu ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:17:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But how does "nothing new" kill people more than nothing new mean nothing new? Nothing new means nothing new, G man.
absolute_imperial ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:10:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
wat. slow down and try to make more sense, please. Thanks for the downvote too, asshole.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:08:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
hm..... what on Earth are you trying to say here? lol
abearnamedpoo ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:28:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
dayand "sat", i thinkTareXmd ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:52:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Kids will "love" anything. To know if it's true love ask them to recite the lyrics to all songs in the movie.
Kosko ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:13:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Actually that bothered me about the movie, there was no family friendly songs.
TheRingshifter ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:43:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Come on... a kid loving a film does not make it great. Kids are stupid (all kids - me, and you, and everyone as a kid).
magikarpcandosplash ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:06:43 on May 17, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The story was about dinosaurs living much like humans in a world where humans are the animals. I bet they want to keep the dinosaurs simple so we can project ourselves into the characters better. It's especially important to keep them as simplistic as possible because humans also exist, but we need to project ourselves with the dinosaurs more than with the humans.
The_Mooing_Throwaway ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 08:29:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Easier to make and sell plush toys and merchandise with those character designs
Bizlitistical ยท 108 points ยท Posted at 06:30:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
could you imagine trying to tell a story with jurassic park dinosaurs though...pixar knows what they did and why they did it.
iamwastedbutimready ยท 43 points ยท Posted at 07:00:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Disney has attempted this.
blewpah ยท 36 points ยท Posted at 07:02:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I loved Dinosaurs as a kid but I don't remember it well enough to know if it holds up.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 09:34:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think that says it all. After you see a Pixar movie, you never really forget it, or at least I haven't
broadcasthenet ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:47:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cars 2? Planes? That other Planes movie that I can't even remember the title to?
Menqr ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:08:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Planes and Planes 2 weren't made by Pixar, or even Walt Disney Animation Studios, they were made by DisneyToon Studios.
hakkzpets ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:06:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Disney Animation Studios never touches sequels to begin with. They would never make a sequel for another studio's movie. Their bar for what they make is off the charts.
It's like you have Pixar standing on Mt. Everest and then DAS sitting on the moon.
WiseGuyCS ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:16:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That would be DreamWorks actually.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:49:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well regardless, it just goes to show those are bad movies too (I don't think Planes was Pixar though). Point being if the movie was forgettable, probably wasn't that good.
broadcasthenet ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:59:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think I will forget The Good Dinosaur. I will probably never forget Wall-E which I consider their best film, probably wont forget the Toy Stories either. The rest I am likely to forget, especially ones like Monsters University and Brave and Inside Out all of these I consider to be pretty mediocre.
In fact Pixar has been on a downhill slide for the past 7 or so years with no stopping in sight. Part of it is because I am older and part of it is because the movies have just gotten worse.
doctorocelot ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:07:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Inside out was amazing, its among their best and that is really recent.
broadcasthenet ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:09:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I disagree entirely. The power of opinions.
doctorocelot ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:14:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ok, but you disagree with the general consensus.
broadcasthenet ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:23:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
General consensus can often be wrong. Popularity does not mean quality.
doctorocelot ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 11:53:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was really popular with critics as well, some of them were saying it might be the first animated film to get a best picture oscar. It's far cleverer than any of pixar's previous work, it's a great film to help kids learn about emotion, the story was excellent, it was very visually appealing. It was heartwarming, insightful and it eloquently handled it's characters.
I know it's just opinion, but your statement that popular opinion can be wrong, while true in some cases, in this case it smacks of arrogance. It seems like you think your opinion is more correct than anyone else's, but you are just some guy on the Internet.
broadcasthenet ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:03:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No my opinion is just my opinion. Inside Out did not have an excellent story, the story is an adolescent who moves to a different state and town and learns to deal with it. It is a great film for kids, but so was Cars 2(in fact Cars series is by far the most popular with kids). I found the visuals to be very good, but for 200 million it better look visually pleasing. And lastly its characters were all one dimensional by design.
Inside Out is a great movie if you are a kid or you are watching it with your kid it is one of the few Pixar movies that an adult without children can find hard to enjoy.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:03:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah dude I was just kinda highlighting the fact that OP didn't remember Dinosaur so that should be an indication of it not be too good. The Pixar comment was really just for comparison, wasn't necessarily my point at all.
Velocirapist69 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:19:45 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It seems most CGI movies are going downhill. They all look so uninspired to me with the likes of Disney making these cgi movies with semi realistic looking characters such as Frozen or this Dinosaur movie and its weird no effort dinosaurs. They have lost their charm.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:29:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
broadcasthenet ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:32:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes it was made by Pixar. Planes was made by Disney though which is true. Although that is splitting hairs cause Disney owns 100% of Pixar.
You can even see it on Pixars IMDB page look what else is there too by the way.
indianajoes ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 08:54:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Even Disney didn't go all out when they did that. They had the dinosaurs talk in Dinosaur. Although I think they wanted them to be silent and Eisner forced them to add voices. That film would be so much better if it didn't have weird voices doing dated references and was more like Wall-E.
mrbooze ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:40:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Reminds me of one of my favorite moments in any Godzilla movie ever.
thefreshp ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 07:25:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I loved Dinosaur! The twin Carnotauruses were freakin terrifying.
poland626 ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 07:07:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dinosaur was an amazing film as a kid. I loved it and rewatched it so many times
Bizlitistical ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 07:04:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
was that the terrible dino movie uh...it was like "the dinosaur" or something.
Spider_Dude ยท 44 points ยท Posted at 06:59:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Land Before Time did it well enough.
eye-scream ยท 92 points ยท Posted at 07:16:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep yep yep
jaguar90 ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 08:09:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is probably the most nostalgia inducing comment I've read this year. I wouldn't have remembered this until reading it. Was it that little female triceratops?
[deleted] ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 08:52:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
it was Ducky!!
A_Wizzerd ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:13:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
95Mb ยท 36 points ยท Posted at 08:42:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No, she was the little Parasaurolophus whose voice actor was brutally murdered by her derranged step-father.
nicolas-siplis ยท 33 points ยท Posted at 08:50:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep yep yep!
puskathethird ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 08:50:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nope... Nope... Nope... :(
jaguar90 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:23:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh. Fuck.
Rockburgh ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:15:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just to mess up your day even more, it was a murder-suicide. Shot in her sleep, then her mother, then he burned the bodies and shot himself in the garage. That family deserved so much better.
TheDranx ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:37:39 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wanna get even more depressing? Her gravestone has "Yep! Yep! Yep!" written on it.
gerald_bostock ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 12:07:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why do you people always have to bring that up? Can't we just nostalgically remember Ducky without having to bring real life into it?
windsorwork ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:03:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Triggered
aaffddssaa ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 08:44:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And the nostalgia inevitably leads to soul-crushing despair anytime that particular character is brought up.
edit: too late, already happened.
kylelost4 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:25:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nah it was Ducky, whose actress was murdered by her father.
Lordrandall ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:35:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You smell me?
thisdesignup ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 08:07:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs in Land Before Time don't look like Jurassic Park dinosaurs. Unless I'm not remembering something...
Bizlitistical ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 07:02:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
mmm star leafs
edit: aka tree stars if you don't use google's auto suggestions...
I_am_Gmork ยท 29 points ยท Posted at 07:09:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tree stars เฒ _เฒ
TinFoilWizardHat ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:10:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
(Tree Star)
TinFoilWizardHat ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:09:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Heh. They looked nothing like the dino's in Jurassic Park, though.
johntheswan ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:07:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's an unfair comparison because one could argue that the land before time is a far more visually stylized. Like... have you watched it and seen the characters? This isn't a knock against either film and their respective art direction by any means, I just think you can't expect "Walking With Dinosaurs" when watching a movie about talking dinosaurs.
Yes the landscapes are photorealistic, and beautifully done. But imagine if the dinosaurs were as real and could talk...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6s9sjPzyQjk
champ64 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:53:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, but if the How to Train Your Dragon movies can make their dragons cute while straying away from looking overly cartoony, then so can The Good Dinosaur
Rusty_The_Taxman ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 07:47:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar acts like they don't know what they are doing but make no mistake, Pixar knows exactly what they are doing.
mecklejay ยท 30 points ยท Posted at 07:58:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Let's dispel with this fiction that Pixar doesn't know what they're doing. They know exactly what they're doing.
svel ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 10:23:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There it is. There it is, the memorized 112-character speech. There it is, everybody.
mooreman27 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:54:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So meta it hurts
thisdesignup ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 08:08:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes, even if they make mistakes it's likely well thought out. There is no reason to believe they are just winging it.
codithou ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 09:49:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
whoosh
thisdesignup ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:56:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eh? If that was a joke then it was a bad joke.
LiquidSilver ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:53:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Let's dispel with this fiction that mecklejay doesn't know what he's doing. Mecklejay knows exactly what he's doing.
Rusty_The_Taxman ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:04:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Look /u/thisdesignup, right now things are far worse than they were before when Pixar wasn't directed so horribly, so let's dispel with this fiction that Pixar doesn't know what they are doing because they know exactly what they are doing.
Senior1292 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:54:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fun Fact: A typical animator can produce 20 seconds of film footage a year. A Pixar animator can produce 30 seconds of footage a year. They definitely know what they're doing.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well sure, but it's not like "overly simplistic blob-creature" and "100% realistic dinosaur" are the only two options. Pixar struck a great balance between the extremes before, such as in "Brave" or "Finding Nemo".
This time I simply feel like they went too far into the cartoony corner for my personal taste and it just looks silly to me. I think what bothers me most is that in their other movies the animals still had believable (though exaggerated) anatomy, whereas here the titular dinosaur looks like a sphere with sticks glued to it and a child's drawing for a face.
TheRingshifter ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:41:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Obviously they don't because the Good Dinosaur was crap. Don't get me wrong - not just because of the dinosaur graphics.
Tralan ยท 52 points ยท Posted at 06:27:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But still really detailed. They had definite weight, and while cartoony, didn't look out of place. You could even see the sheen when they got wet.
headinwater ยท 28 points ยท Posted at 08:52:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The most infuriating part of the movie was how out of place the characters looked. They had an entirely different color scheme and texture happening. Plus, they looked clunky (to me) and didn't move like natural creatures. Drove me crazy the whole film especially considering the intense backdrop that was behind them. It felt like an unfinished product to me. I understand why people liked the movie but I had a difficult time getting past the design factors.
veul ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:31:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked how the trexes galloped like horses.
ScoochMagooch ยท 44 points ยท Posted at 08:00:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually thought they looked out of place :\
angwilwileth ยท 26 points ยท Posted at 10:16:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Me too. It's like the character designers and background artists had a huge fight and never resolved their differences.
ScoochMagooch ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:19:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ditto that thought crossed my mind as well
CrunchyCorpse ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:28:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
i personally thought it was intentional.
addysol ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:27:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah I felt a little let down by that. Super realistic, gorgeous backdrops but then they just went "ah fuck it. He's a green, blocky looking dinosaur"
sidogz ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:49:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cartoony, yes, simplistic, no. I was really amazed at the depth and detailing of the textures and surface rendering of the characters.
It was obviously a choice to have them Cartoony and not a limitation of ability.
The story, however, lacked any kind of depth. What the hell was the moral point of the movie? If you try hard enough you'll still fail and let your family down. Or was it that pets smell and they belong in the wild?
Twat_The_Douche ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:39:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yea that was the first thing I noticed. Amazing scenery, but i really didn't like the dinosaur models they used. It didn't seem to fit with the environment and gave the movie a cheap feel.
ScoochMagooch ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:56:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They actually really clash... It's kind of a detriment to the film imo
honbadger ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:58:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a design choice. Usually in animation the more detail you add to the character the more distracting it gets to the performance.
Gibber_jab ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:21:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Funnily enough when I was at uni I made a dinosaur in my CGI class that looked almost identical to the lead character
DoctorSteve ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:27:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the backgrounds look the same.
Photo_Synthetic ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:40:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The whole world is like that though too, it's just lush enough to not notice. That's what I like about Pixar. They manage to have the ABILITY to make fully lifelike scenes but choose not to because it's not necessary to tell the story. It also allows you to not study the background much and be able to focus on the story and the characters... It's just real enough to believe but not so real it's distracting....
DanCTapirson ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:16:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And ugly as hell
NikkoE82 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:49:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's unfortunate, but they have to consider how the characters will translate to various toy production scenarios.
wizards_upon_dragons ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:15:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not as awful looking at the character models in the Star Wars: The Clone Wars series tho
behemuthm ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:16:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I seriously refused to watch the film because of how retarded the main dinosaur looks.
eLTeezyMcSteez ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:39:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm thinking they simplified them so heavily because of some of the sheer violence portrayed in the movie. It was honestly kind of brutal at times, if the dino models were as realistic as the scenery... It wouldn't feel like much of a kids movie.
lonesome_valley ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:32:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
UP was the same way. Great landscapes, but the people and animals looked very cartoonish
mack-megaton ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:56:11 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The models were simplistic, but the texture is just as good as anything in the landscapes.
Kardtart ยท -29 points ยท Posted at 01:50:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Are you seriously saying the shaders on the dinosaurs were simple?
[deleted] ยท 28 points ยท Posted at 01:57:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
PooFartChamp ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:38:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I remember seeing this and being confused because it looked so much like a DreamWorks movie
Doctorboffin ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 02:52:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
More like Dreamworks? I don't know I'd say Dreamworks always beats Pixar for modeling.
Howzieky ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 03:55:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You're getting downvoted but I want to remind everyone of How to Train Your Dragon 2
Doctorboffin ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:22:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Like maybe I'm wrong, but I'd like to hear why instead of downvotes. To me and from what I have read Dreamworks has always been at the front with technology and animation ability.
Mr_Thunders ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 04:42:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Welcome to reddit.
Howzieky ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 04:25:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Agreed, dreamworks was always maybe 1 step behind pixar in the past, but they've really stepped it up
Kardtart ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 04:35:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes, the dinosaurs shaders. They aren't image textures... It isn't a video game.
Sadsharks ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:49:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Shaders apply shading to a model. As he says, he is criticizing the models, not the lighting.
Kardtart ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 08:27:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lighting applies lighting. Shaders contain information on the bump, color, reflections, transparency, specular light, luminosity etc.
Random-Miser ยท -73 points ยท Posted at 04:53:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thats because they were added in at the last second. the movie original had no dinosaurs and was titled "The Good Dog" They changed it at the last second because they wanted it to be something that would sell toys. So after EVERYTHING, including all of the audio was recorded, they went in and switched out all the people with dinosaurs.
If you listen to just the audio of this movie, you would never suspect it had anything to do with dinosaurs at all, because when it was recorded dinosaurs were not part of the equation.
TeaForObiWanKenobi ยท 52 points ยท Posted at 05:18:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
what the fuck. that is completely bullshit. Pixar called this movie something like "untitled movie about dinosaurs" before it was titled so it has always been about dinosaurs
Thorngeist ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 05:27:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That could not be more wrong. One of the leading lighting artists and look-dev members of the team for The Good Dinosaur came and spoke at my school before real production began on this project, clearly stating its title as it is now.
Also, anyone that knows ANYTHING about 3D animation knows you can't just "switch out all the people with dinosaurs" "at the last second". That's not even the same kind of animation rigging. Stop spreading falsehoods.
Random-Miser ยท -22 points ยท Posted at 05:38:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
By "last second", I mean 4 years. "The Good Dog" was finished in 2012, it took them 4 years to change it into "the good dinosaur".
socialworkersuicide ยท 24 points ยท Posted at 05:02:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Source?
pockets817 ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 05:43:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
OP doesn't have one. Because he's probably full of shit.
clarkie13 ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 05:48:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No probably about it
pockets817 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 05:51:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You.
roadrunner440x6 ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 06:34:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
OP is not the one making this claim.
pockets817 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:43:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I simply meant the guy who originally made the claim. Not the poster of the images. I thought that was common knowledge here?
roadrunner440x6 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:09:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sorry, I am noob.
pockets817 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:02:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Is okay, don't feel bad.
[deleted] ยท -17 points ยท Posted at 04:59:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Jackie_Jormp-Jomp ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 05:07:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's not true.
From wiki:
Random-Miser ยท -42 points ยท Posted at 05:13:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They did indeed BUT that was NOT what the movie originally was. The good dinosaur was a different unrelated project that was grafted onto an already finished movie.
Francis_Picklefield ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 05:21:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ok I was intrigued for a moment but now i'm 100% sure you're just making shit up
Random-Miser ยท -22 points ยท Posted at 05:32:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Really.... is that why the dinosaurs farm, and raise chickens despite not eating meat, and not having any ability to make tools for farming?
Is that why the audio has ZERO references to dinosaurs at all throughout the entire film, not even dinosaur noises of any type? Or why the human inexplicably only makes dog noises?
This movie was originally an Ol'Yeller knockoff, and had absolutely nothing to do with dinosaurs. But after Jurassic World was announced, that changed in order to get in on that cool Dino toy money. thus "The good Dinosaur" was born, New models were hastely thrown together over the course of 4 years, and integrated into the "The Good Dogs" Backgrounds, and tada...one super shitty dino movie ended up being made that made zero logical sense.
ajustice83 ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 05:45:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The key to being a novelty troll is to be somewhat likable.
Not to mention bringing up the success of Jurassic World, then again saying they "hastily" reassembled the movie over 4 years
Random-Miser ยท -8 points ยท Posted at 06:15:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was not exactly a core project, they did not spend a lot of dedicated time on it.
mysterioussir ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:41:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, an Ol Yeller knockoff sounds exactly like something Pixar would waste their time on.
I also don't understand how you find the human sounding like a dog inexplicable. That's literally the point.
Random-Miser ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 06:50:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It sounds like a dog, because it originally WAS a dog. It is not that the dinos sound "like" people. It is that they in no way not even once sound anything at all like dinosaurs. If you heard only the audio from this movie you would have never once at all thought that it in any way included dinosaurs in it, because when they recorded the audio it didn't.
queen_oops ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 05:32:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A simple source link would clear all this up.
Random-Miser ยท -20 points ยท Posted at 05:39:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There isn;t an official one, I know this because I worked on the "The Good Dog".
MrMontombo ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:01:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
-.-
Jackie_Jormp-Jomp ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:51:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What did you do?
Random-Miser ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 06:52:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I fixed servers mainly. :p
MediocreMind ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:01:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In other words no, you did not work on any such thing.
Unless 'The Good Dog' is what you call your penis, in which case... me, too!
PooFartChamp ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:37:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I for one enjoy your lies.
thefastcookiemonster ยท -27 points ยท Posted at 05:03:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
you wonder why they were simplistic? they used all their money on backdrops and probably so the characters/dinos stood out due to their poor detail compared to the scenary
CatSoup69 ยท 32 points ยท Posted at 06:57:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What's really cool is they used geospatial data collected by the United States geological survey to render the landscape so a lot of the landscapes in the movie are real or very close to real. I read a really good article about it shared by the USGS Facebook page a while ago but I can't find it now :/
s4in7 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 14:55:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just Google "USGS good dinosaur" and there's tons are articles.
Particular points of interest:
One scene of Good Dinosaur is composed of as much data as the entirety of Cars 2.
The majority of the USGS and Google Earth data focused on translating Wyoming's Grand Tetons to screen.
64,000 total miles of American landscape were translated to screen
NSD2327 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:08:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep. You can find most, if not all, of these landscapes in western Wyoming.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:15:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's an extensive article about this here:
http://www.slashfilm.com/making-of-the-good-dinosaur/
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 145 points ยท Posted at 00:18:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
It's pretty strange to see cartoonish dinosaurs on a realistic environment, but the scenery is spectacular.
HighAndDrunk ยท 54 points ยท Posted at 06:34:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't know that I feel that way. I was okay with it. If it had been 100% cartoon style I wouldn't have made it to the end of the movie. And if the characters were too realistic the plot wouldn't have made much sense. I though it flowed really well.
PaterBinks ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 08:35:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
At the end of the day it's a Pixar film, if the characters weren't cartoonish, it wouldn't have felt like Pixar.
TheRingshifter ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 14:45:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I feel like Pixar have been being even more "cartoonish" recently though. Like, Toy Story is cartoonish. The Grave of the Fireflies is cartoonish. But Toy Story is probably more cartoonish than the Grave of the Fireflies and the Good Dinosaur is probably more cartoonish than either... just the annoying huge eyes and overdone expressions... the Good Dinosaur felt very try-hard in this respect and I thought the dinosaurs looked truly awful.
PaterBinks ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 14:50:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the dinosaurs are a match with other Pixar creatures. Do you have a problem with the characters in Monsters Inc.?
I think the problem is that people can't seem to get over the fact that The Good Dinosaur has cartoonish characters set within more realistic surroundings. It jarred with me initially, but it all started to blend fairly quickly.
TheRingshifter ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:03:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nah... I think the Good Dinosaur characters are more cartoonish.
Look at his face:
http://www.aceshowbiz.com/images/news/the-good-dinosaur-the-dinosaurs-finally-speak-up.jpg
It's like, literally all mouth (with weird-looking teeth) and eyes. There's like nothing else on his face.
With the Monsters Inc characters,
http://images.clipartpanda.com/monster-inc-characters-monsters-inc-cartoon-hd-wallpaper-2880x1800-7990.jpg
Yeah of course Mike has a huge eye, but I don't know - it seems less obnoxious since it's part of his monster quality, and it doesn't seem to emote as obnoxiously as the Good Dinosaurs'. Scully is pretty well-proportioned, in terms of face stuff.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:33:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think it's the lack of any detail that makes the dino look so creepy in comparison. Even if you look at Mike's rather simple face, you still see a lot of subtle things like little color variations, wrinkles, some sharp edges that contrast the bigger smooth surfaces, the way his eyelids crumple when he moves his eye... meanwhile the dino's face is this perfectly uniform blob with two holes poked in it. It not just a matter of being too cartoonish, its more that it looks lifeless.
TheRingshifter ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:39:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes that is true. I would count "lack of detail" as something that is "cartoonish" though.
PaterBinks ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 19:18:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think it might be because you are thinking of the cartoon dinosaurs in relation to real dinosaurs without thinking of the monsters in relation to "real" monsters.
If you imagine that the monsters in Monsters Inc. are supposed to be terrifying, their cartoonish qualities are made clear. Sully is supposed to be one of the scariest monsters in Monsters Inc, but he looks like a big fluffy teddy bear.
myhihi1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:29:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But Pixar did not make Grave of the Fireflies?
TheRingshifter ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:14:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I know. I'm just saying it's a cartoon but it's less "cartoonish".
CrunchyCorpse ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:33:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
i had the same thought. Not sure if it was the original intention, but having realistic "grown-up" landscapes and cartoony characters worked, making sure the movie didn't drift in one of both directions.
FancySnack ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:33:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The Amazing World of Gumball does this really cool mix of different animation styles and it's epic, though. The overall design of Arlo and his family was a big part of why I wasn't super into The Good Dinosaur - regardless of how un-textured and neon he was.
heyboyhey ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 11:28:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm not sure I'm against the whole concept, but I found the Dinos in this movie the worst looking characters out of all the Pixar movies. The human-dog was great though.
Slither_savvy ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:08:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Perhaps it was based off older styled cartoons? Older cartoons... The Aristocats was a cartoon on a much more detailed background. Wish cartoons still looked like this, that's why I love Studio Ghibli films.
DashIsBestPony ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 06:19:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It still blows my mind that this was all made in a computer. It's breathtaking.
ShaneDayZ ยท 84 points ยท Posted at 04:53:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie was kinda meh imo, very much for kids.
CForre12 ยท 157 points ยท Posted at 05:51:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie was even bad for kids. Ask a kid what they thought about it and you might hear "it was good" as a response but you'll never hear them talk about it again for the rest of the day. Or ever for that matter; that's how you know if they really liked it or not
WhySoWorried ยท 82 points ยท Posted at 06:40:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Very true. My daughter is into dinosaurs and couldn't wait to see the film, she'd been talking about it for months, but the second that we finished watching the movie she said it was nice and I haven't heard about it since.
Equeon ยท 108 points ยท Posted at 07:39:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Personally, I thought there would be more about the actual dinosaurs.
The tagline was all about how dinosaurs never died out, and the first scene shows this big farm, built by dinosaurs.
So at this point I'm expecting a really interesting, quality Pixar movie showing a lot of the different dinosaur "cultures" and how they interact with humans.
Instead, I got a pretty straightforward movie about friendship and overcoming fear, complete with Arlo yelling about a hundred different times.
Seeing the other "Dino cultures" like I mentioned: the pterodactyl scavengers, the Tyrannosaurus herders (my favorite), and the raptor poachers were all very entertaining and interesting to me, but these were all pretty brief clearly designed to be little more than pages in the greater chapter of Arlo's adventure.
It was hard for me to believe that this was from the same company that made A Bug's Life and Finding Nemo, two films that (in my opinion) did a far better job of creating memorable characters in a world of talking animals.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 22 points ยท Posted at 08:15:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Looking into it, the film was reworked a few times and went through two directors before it was made. It was almost destined for failure
foyiwae ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:05:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah I was saying that to my friend after we watched it. I would be far more interested in a sequel where we learn about the different dinosaur cultures. I thought the T-Rex characters were interesting, and Arlo's father was quite good. But the 'adventure' itself was just meh. Even the Storm Chasers was quite a good take on something extreme.
I would have preferred Arlo going to the watering hole the T-Rex's were going to, and maybe meeting more dinosaurs, and how they lived. Would it be like a major place?
It wasn't bad the movie, but it was nothing to write home about personally. It was cute. I guess.
mack-megaton ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:37:16 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I really had no idea what the movie was going to be about, but I ended up really enjoying it. As much as I loved "Inside Out", I was more emotionally invested in "The Good Dinosaur".
While a healthy amount of world building is appreciated and can add a lot to the story you're trying to tell, I feel like Pixar really excels at stories that use a minimal amount of artifice. Less time is spent being on a tour of this world, and we are able to understand and get to the emotional stakes more quickly. Don't misunderstand me, I think that movies can do both, world building and emotional resonance. It's not necessarily one or the other, but movies, like Up, WALL-E, and the Good Dinosaur, will always have more importance to me.
I guess what I'm saying is, that as much as we would like to see more of the T-Rex ranchers, the weird Manson-Family Pterodactyls, and the raptor hillbillies, they are all just interludes in Arlo and Spot's stories. They are both on a journey of discovery, and everyone they encounter is there to teach them a lesson about the larger world.
I just like the almost wordless exchanges between Arlo and Spot, especially when they tell each other about the people they have lost. Yes, every character has big dewey eyes, but the world is no less dangerous and the grief and sadness are no less real.
And it's a story about a boy and his dog essentially, and I'm just hard-wired to empathize more with that.
kentuckypill ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 07:58:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ouch, a kid saying a movie was just "nice" seems really damning.
nascentt ยท 31 points ยท Posted at 10:18:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just imaging this as a movie poster review.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 15:14:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The "good"โญ๏ธโญ๏ธ dinosaur.
PixiePooper ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:34:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They would have just hidden the 2 star review like they did for The Guardian's review of this - Genius!
tonytroz ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 07:07:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's a reason it was pushed back for years. Pretty to look at and the river scene was Lion King-esque, but not up to Pixar's standards that we're used to.
DragoneerFA ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 07:22:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The main characters all look over-simplified, as if they were designed more for the appeal of a potential toy line than for anything else. They just felt... awkward. This is one of the few Pixar movies I really just couldn't find interest for.
laststance ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:43:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In my opinion the "hallmark" of a Pixar film is a film that can tug on your heart strings with little to no dialog, the actions and the expressions express the gravity of the scene. Up had the long montage without a single word being uttered. Toy Story 1, 2, and 3 all had moments where you can feel real resentment and emotions in the voice acting. The stories themselves were also more elaborate. Wall-e basically was just eyebrows moving but it conveyed emotions that were relate-able and easy to pick up on.
But there are also movies that "fall short" of the Pixar hallmark in my opinion. Brave was very bland and "cookie cutterish". It felt like a girl power movie that was made to ride the girl power hype train. Nothing in that movie seemed original nor did it have the Pixar twist. Monsters University seemed like a very poor story without many jokes peppered in, its not the witty writing you expect from Pixar, the witty writing makes it enjoyable for adults and children. Cars 2 felt like a cash grab. Either the Pixar sheen is wearing off, or Pixar has lost quite a few of its writers. The stories and character development isn't keeping up with the technological progress seen in the pictures. The rendering is amaing, but the story and characters are lacking.
DragoneerFA ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:23:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Disney's purchase of Pixar in 2006 is where I feel things started to go South. Sure, Cars was already out, and it was blatant cash grab, but I could forgive that to some degree. But if you look at all the movies that came after you can see a noticeable decline in quality. Sure, Up, Ratatoille and Wall-E came out after that, but I imagine those films were knee-deep in development. But around the time of Brave the quality starts taking a noticeable decline (with exception for Inside Out).
None of Pixar's films are bad, but they lack the groundbreaking storytelling and risk that made Pixar what it was seems to have also declined. Their later films are all pretty much "safe".
Pixar's upcoming film list? Cars 3. Toy Story 4. Finding
Nemo 2Dory. Not that exciting. Yet, Disney's 3D team (which Pixar helped build up) has picked up the torch with films like Bolt, Tangled, Wreck-it-Ralph, Frozen, Big Hero 6 and Zootopia. As it is, the Pixar magic transitioned from Pixar to Disney. Pixar is stuck loop if mostly sequels while Disney is knocking them out of the park with almost consistent films from their 3D side.laststance ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:47:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree, there has been a huge drop in story and character development. But leaps and bounds in progress in the technical field, Brave's hair, The Good Dinosaur's background, etc. Its pretty interesting since the majority of the hits are from the famous Pixar Dinner
I do agree though a lot of Pixar's recent films look like a "paint by numbers movie" or a very bland story where the characters don't have much motivation for their actions. Something bad happens? Better flip like a coin. This is why I don't like Ratatouille the characters were very shallow, even the sous chef seemed like a generic female role "oh I'm in a man's world, better be tough".
Kosko ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:17:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't exactly "fun", no songs, death, weird drug scenes, terrifying teradactlyes, scarred TRex good guys, rejecting parents, loses the friend at the end. I don't know how this one made the cutting room floor.
indianajoes ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:56:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't a bad film. It was harmless compared to some kids movies. It was just average or okay.
solidasacloud ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:16:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Aw, disagree! My cousin is 7 and obsessed with dinosaurs. Every time I go to see her, she asks to watch this movie with me. I've seen it like four times already, and I only see her like once every six months haha.
TrickleUpKarma ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:39:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The thing that ruined it for me was the kid, nevermind humans and dinosaurs live together, but they made the baby human a freaking fighting machine for no reason what so ever. It was more aggressive than a freaking dinosaur, like come on, just cause dinosaurs didn't go extinct human children are little hulks?
trafficrush ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 05:17:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
...that's who it's marketed to?
ShaneDayZ ยท 39 points ยท Posted at 05:48:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So is toy story / monsters inc ... They do a great job of appealing to both adults and children.
tonytroz ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 07:08:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar can usually transcend the kid market and also appeal to adults. This was a rare miss, not even a miss like Cars that at least did well with kids and merchandising.
trafficrush ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:51:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fair enough. I guess I can see their/your point. It was a very un-original story sadly. The visuals were a treat though!
JamEngulfer221 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:16:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, my thought too. It was just meh
Whitworth ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:53:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My 4 year old hates it. Pixar only gets one chance to do a dinosaur movie, and this is what we get? Great scenery!
DayOldPeriodBlood ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:56:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eh, I really enjoyed the movie. It was sad, adventurous, but fun, and sometimes funny. I liked the plot, yeah it's pretty similar to The Lion King, but I loved the relationship between the main dinosaur and the kid... my eyes got teary near the end of the movie.
Biohaza ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:14:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, soulless movie for sure.
PaterBinks ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:35:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I enjoyed it more than Inside Out and I'm 22!
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:47:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
Also, please consider using Voat.co as an alternative to Reddit as Voat does not censor political content.
clamatowas ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 07:12:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I noticed watching this movie it's was the most beautiful they have ever made.
But who designed the Dino's? The directors 4 year old niece?
headinwater ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:56:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I posted this on another comment: The most infuriating part of the movie was how out of place the characters looked. They had an entirely different color scheme and texture happening. Plus, they looked clunky (to me) and didn't move like natural creatures. Drove me crazy the whole film especially considering the intense backdrop that was behind them. It felt like an unfinished product to me. I understand why people liked the movie but I had a difficult time getting past the design factors. TL;DR The directors 4 year old niece designed the dinos?
clamatowas ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 18:26:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Exactly, they stood out of the environment in a bad way. But the critters that where cute and funny looking. They fit perfectly, I don't get how after rending a scene they could not see the problem and fixed it before moving forward.
mokopo ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 08:30:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I disagree, tried watching it, and while it looked beautiful, I fell asleep because it was boring. I was actually excited to watch it too, its just....meh.
kickingscreaming ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:42:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's gorgeous. My SO is an animator, and couldn't stop flipping out about the detail in the reflections. We were sad when it ended because a) the advertising didn't do the film any justice, which means not enough people will see this, b) the people who do watch this probably won't appreciate these kinds of nuances or details, c) it was pretty sad, and d) we'd just watched the most depressing episode of Six Feet Under before putting on this movie, so were already kind of sad. Alas.
We lived out west for a few years, so the landscapes and textures in this film felt very much like home to both of us. As such, I found the score far too Appalachian, which was off-putting, though it conjured the appropriate emotions.
department4c ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:54:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's an interesting statement considering John Lasseter's quote which essentially states the opposite:
Hydress ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 02:20:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I guess I'm one of the few that disliked it? I felt like they took a lot of shortcuts to make the scenery, it's blatantly obvious in some scenes that the landscape background and foreground are 2D. Example being the scene where the dinosaur first meets Spot. The grass is just pasted over the bottom of the screen, but none of that is actually there when their feet are shown.
They barely interact with their surroundings and the times they do, it looks bizarre. The camera barely ever panned.
If you look for it, you can tell it's just photographs posted onto a 3D object and the tessellation used just doesn't look great either.
Maybe all these flaws are just stick out far more with the simple dinosaur models along side it?
I've always wanted to see animated movies purely to marvel at the skill, even as a kid, but I felt like this was so cheap for Pixar's standards.
Edit: Everyone is backing my argument. Guess they don't see my point. All the images and videos prove my point about photos being pasted onto a 3D object. Have to reiterate that it sticks out to me, therefore I dislike it.
Oldsodacan ยท 39 points ยท Posted at 05:23:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw a tech presentation by someone who worked on this film in a supervisory capacity. They went as far as finding actual geographical data for Wyoming and recreating it 100% digitally for their sets. A lot of the scenery you see in this movie can be found in real life. These weren't photographs, the movie is mostly 3D. All the water you see is 3D. Visually, this movie is breath taking.
However, I do feel that while the movie itself looks better than real life, too much focus was put on that while barely any focus was placed on story and characters. This movie felt more like a Renderman tech demo where we watch a dinosaur fall down for an hour and a half. I rank it as the most forgettable Pixar movie.
[deleted] ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 06:55:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
mecklejay ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:03:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Man, I really dig when you have such a big expanse that you can see specific clouds' shadows on the ground.
TURBODERP ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:32:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I opened both of those images in my two next tabs and when I clicked them I immediately closed them because I was certain I had misclicked and gotten two real photos instead of the real photo and the movie recreation.
kickingscreaming ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:47:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Totally believable, this movie felt like Wyoming (at least the part I lived in), it was uncanny.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:36:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The Grand Tetons in this album are spot on too
jojojoy ยท 22 points ยท Posted at 03:09:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's pretty much all 3d. It's one of their most expensive movies because of all the tech used in the landscapes.
bobo1618 ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 06:26:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This comment is probably the best endorsement for the photorealism achieved in the landscapes.
kimjong-ill ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 05:50:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
can you verify your claims as to the 2d? I feel like they might be baseless.
Bizlitistical ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 06:19:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
they are baseless. even the skies and clouds are are generated. No hdri skymaps or anything. it has set a new standard for cg environments.
roadrunner440x6 ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:42:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I beg to differ.
Darkseer89 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:07:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thanks for sharing, watched the whole clip. I def want to see the movie.
Doctorboffin ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 02:48:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree, I would much rather have matte painting like that in Madagascar, Big Hero 6, Lego Movie, etc.
They might not look as realistic, but to me there is a lot more effort and creative designs in them. For example that Madagascar one is all hand painted, with animated movies there is this great excuse to do stuff like that, but in live action you can't. Why try to make it look like live action when you can actually make it unique.
drallbran ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 03:39:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It should be noted that animated movies are still very much held back by the computers we have today and a lot of work goes into optimizing the output process to create the visuals you get. It'd be wildly inefficient not to treat the landscape as a matte painting in places, or to pre-render texture images or to render sections separately. It's just part of the process. There HAS to be shortcuts. It's still entirely created in 3D, just with a few tricks.
wingzero00 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 05:52:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Disney basically invented a new rendering system for Big Hero 6 and its used in Zootopia, im really wondering how good it'll look.
DeBomb123 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:48:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I also loved the soundtrack.
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:26:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, it's really nice
vxx ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:33:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm curious. Are there human as well in the movie, or did the dinosaurs learn to farm?
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:34:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There are several humans shown in the movie. Yep, dinos learned to farm.
paintballman3000 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:50:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie is worth watching for amazing visuals only.
ftfy
oldsoul89 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:16:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My favorite parts (SPOILERS):
1) The scene where the pterodactyls stick their beaks out of the clouds before they attack, looking like sharks.
2)The scene where the Dino and kid trip MAD BALLS.
TrumpDumper ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:03:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What was with the psychedelic mushroom scene?
Slither_savvy ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:00:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
All that great scenery, and then they make the dinosaur ugly as hell.
eastcoastgamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:38:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My 2.5 year old loves that movie. I like it too. The visuals are top notch and a good movie as well.
37214 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:00:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why did this Pixar movie flop? It was reviewed with a lot of 'meh'
lunaspice78 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:57:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
An amazing movie. I cried like a little baby girl...
VROF ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 07:05:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is the greatest dinosaur movie ever https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGPAKBOz9ag
Pollux182 ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 15:25:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As a movie though, it was soooo bad. Especially in the wake of Inside Out. The story was monstrously weak and uninteresting, the characters were extremely unlikable and the entire story arch felt pointless.
Sorry to be all Debbie Downer with this, but I speak as someone who was extremely impressed with Inside Out, then watching this movie and feeling like I genuinely wasted my time.
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:42:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I wasn't terribly impressed with either, but I liked TGD more because of these visuals. IO had nice moments here and there, but nothing on this scale.
Pollux182 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:02:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh, I disagree. IO was phenomenal. Psychologically-wise it was FILLED with amazingly crafted metaphors and allegories that never feel forced or phoned in. If you watch that multiple times you'll still be catching shit.
Portgas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:35:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You disagree that I wasn't impressed with it or that I liked TGD looks better? :) Personally, I didn't find IO phenomenal and don't feel like watching it again for the next decade. I'd rather watch TGD again to admire pretty environments.
Pollux182 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:34:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I meant I disagreed that "IO had good moments here and there." I don't mind if you disagree, I'm not trying to convince you. I was just expressing my view of it.
Suffer_No_Fools ยท 623 points ยท Posted at 00:22:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I read a review somewhere that called The Good Dinosaur a tech demo that Pixar decided to release as a movie.
fer_sure ยท 408 points ยท Posted at 02:05:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Aren't all Pixar movies a tech demo at some level? I remember when I first saw a trailer for 'Brave', I thought that Pixar was throwing down a "so you think you can do Scottish landscapes? THESE are Scottish landscapes" gauntlet to DreamWorks, as a response to 'How To Train Your Dragon'.
Unfortunately, 'Brave' was actually a hair modelling demo.
Suffer_No_Fools ยท 247 points ยท Posted at 04:17:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't think so. The Good Dinosaur is generic and uninspired in a way that Pixar's other lesser films are not. The stories they wanted to tell pushed them to advance their technology, but this time it seems like they didn't know what they wanted to with the story.
RedofPaw ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 07:58:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They changed it more than once, even throwing out the entire voice cast before release.
I think perhaps they had a different script and idea and half way through production had to trash it because it just didn't work, so in the end settled on the safest of all possible options just to get it out the door.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 08:33:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
RedofPaw ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:46:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Huh strange. I thought the premise of 'what if the dinosaurs hadn't died out' was left over from earlier ideas. Now it sort of seems tacked on for marketing purposes.
red-bot ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:16:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This. They also changed hands of directors midway in production. (Bob Peterson to Peter Sohn.) I've also seen some concept artwork from some artists who worked on the version of the story that got scrapped for a short time. It looks like at one time it had more of a dinosaur/human living closely together ending. I would have much rather seen that ending :/
[deleted] ยท 104 points ยท Posted at 05:23:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Did you even see cars 2?
Suffer_No_Fools ยท 77 points ยท Posted at 06:20:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I skipped that one. I saw Cars, though, and it's a real story told with specificity and passion. I don't like every film Pixar has put out, but none of them felt like a half baked product thrown into theaters.
[deleted] ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 08:36:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Sinner13 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 14:26:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Except without the funny
Tralan ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:29:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was PG rated Doc Hollywood. It was the mostest unoriginalest of them all.
MediocreMind ยท 68 points ยท Posted at 07:10:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The underlying story of Cars had as much to do with the death of American cross-country travel culture, the towns that depended desperately on that culture for survival, and what their fates usually were once the interstate system was built as it did Lightning McQueen's racing career and character development, really.
People were way too quick to dismiss that movie as toy advertising bullshit... which it was, obviously, but there was a lot more too it under the shiny plastic surface. The hopeful ending always made me think more than a little of how Who Framed Roger Rabbit? ended, what with mirroring real-life events but with a happier outcome than reality actually gave us.
It'll never be one of those Pixar films that I rush to show my kids or anything, but it deserves more credit than it gets.
DragoneerFA ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 07:24:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the setting for Cars, but didn't feel it helped the overall story. The characters all felt overly stereotyped and it fell into almost every common trope EXCEPT the setting. I think the backstory/concept for Cars was pretty interesting, but the world the cars lived in and plot of the film fell flat.
That said, I give Pixar insane amounts of credit for being able to localize Cars for foreign audiences.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 08:18:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought Cars was pretty decent really.
Tralan ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:39:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was... because Doc Hollywood was a good movie.
docfluty ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:07:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
cars 2 was a simple plot to make me buy as many variations of toy cars for my boy as possible.
a fucking money grab if i ever saw one... and loved it lol
SupaSlide ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:43:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
shoves Cars 2 back into the closet
Shhhh, we don't talk about that one.
danc4498 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:45:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
While I never did like either if the cars movies, my 3 year old fucking loves them, so I've watched then more times than I can count. I've grown to appreciate them.
TISparta217 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:09:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Unlike The Good Dinosaur I enjoyed Cars 2. Sure, it wasn't great, but there was enough going on in the film that I was entertained. The Good Dinosaur had nothing going for it besides being pretty, and I'm more like to watch Cars 2 again than The Good Dinosaur.
comp-sci-fi ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 09:09:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's been described as their first flop. My guess us it has more to do with trying to release two movies in a year. They tried that with Toy Story 2, and had to scrap about IIRC 2 years of work and redo it with their A team.
I guess they don't have enough crazy talented people to be two Pixars yet. Also, Lasseter seems to be off with Disney - probably having the time of his life. I thought Feast was amazing.
myhihi1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:33:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm guessing Disney pushed them on Cars 2 so that they could release more merchandise.
make_love_to_potato ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:37:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree. The good dinosaur was first movie I ever walked out of. The scenery was absolutely beautiful but the dinosaur models were very meh and the story/dialogue was something you would see in a Sunday morning TV movie targeted at 2 year olds. I normally love pixar movies but they really dropped the ball with this one and I can't understand how this got a 77% tomato score.
trademarkj22 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:39:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When I first heard of the premise for this movie, which was basically "what if dinosaurs didn't go extinct" at the time, I thought it was going to be a movie about a world where dinosaurs took over human roles. So you would have dinosaurs in offices and dinosaurs as farmers and shit. Like Cars but with dinosaurs. I think that would have been a better movie.
SLOTH_POTATO_PIRATE ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 06:58:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A dinosaur western is a genius idea. Two of my favorite things growing up were cowboys and T Rex dinos.
tonytroz ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 07:10:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can tell the idea could work on some level (the T Rex scenes were pleasant and the river scene was devastating on a Lion King level) but that just wasn't enough to carry the movie.
SLOTH_POTATO_PIRATE ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:13:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That is why the main character had a supporting character to back him up. They both developed throughout. It made me cry towards the end, honestly.
ZappaBappa ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:23:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
While it wasn't a terrible film, it missed that... Involvement you had with the characters, things just felt a bit random, and in a predictable order. It was a very by the guidelines story and characters, sure some moments were sad, but anyone can be brought to tears with good cinematography and fitting music.
It looked amazing, the trailers were amazing, but the movie definitely fell very short of the expectations.
Minimalphilia ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 07:00:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What?! How to train your Dragon are Skandinavian landscapes in a fantasy world. I loved both movies and I am willing to admit that Brave looked way better but that doesn't invalidate the story and characters.
And dragons don't have hair!
Syn7axError ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 05:46:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No, I wouldn't say so. They're known for their tech, but they're also known for writing some of the best stories out there. They work as movies, too.
Minimalphilia ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:01:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well, why not both?
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:52:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, why not?
[deleted] ยท 22 points ยท Posted at 09:13:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tangled is one of the most expensive movies ever made because of the tech that went into animating her hair.
It was considered an investment in the rendering tech.
LiquidSilver ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 14:58:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You could see the money run out when she first braided it and was then forced to cut all of it.
WaterFungus ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:05:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No it was because of the rewrites and how many times they just scrapped everything and re-did the movie, it was in production for years
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 17:52:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's not why it cost what it did though. I work for Disney.
I don't have time to explain well but this is somewhat accurate: https://www.quora.com/Why-was-Tangled-such-an-expensive-movie-to-make
As noted, #2 and #3 were the driving factors. Rendering hair had never been done like that before.
Danielhibbs ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:19:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It thought Brave was the hair demo? I didn't even think the hair was that impressive in Tangled.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:36:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I recommend checking out some videos on YouTube. The physics of independently flowing 70 foot long hair had never been done before in CGI.
Prior to Tangled hair just kind of existed in CGI worlds. Animators had to make it bounce and whip around with the character.
Danielhibbs ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:44:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cool. I'll take a look thanks for the tip!
BurtaciousD ยท 33 points ยท Posted at 04:53:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Or Frozen was a snow physics demo.
Edit: I realize it wasn't Pixar, but it doesn't mean it wasn't an expanded demo.
FrozenSolace ยท 66 points ยท Posted at 06:27:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Though you have to admit those were very fine snow physics
SodlidDesu ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 06:47:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Hydrophobia was a tech demo. Water physics with minimal story tacked on. Frozen was a movie.
Fuck man.
Two-Tone- ยท 36 points ยท Posted at 07:58:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The water physics were pretty damn good
The gameplay was crap.
Celebrate6-84 ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 08:45:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Damn, that looks gooooood.
Two-Tone- ยท 23 points ยท Posted at 09:10:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Crazy thing is that the game is half a decade old and all that was done on the CPU.
GPU accelerated water effects today are amazing.
vpstylee ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:36:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What do you mean by gpu accelerated? Aren't all video game graphics gpu accelerated?
Two-Tone- ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 10:49:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm not talking about graphics, I'm talking about the physics.
LittleDizzle_ ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:37:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That looks pre rendered. Hydrophobia was real time
Two-Tone- ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:43:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I know Hydrophobia is real time, I recorded that gif. The gif above you is from a real time demo of GPU based physics, including water.
Completely real time and interactable.
Gunrun ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:56:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
GPU accelerated water effects like that aren't doable in an environment that isn't a tiny flat textured box though.
danteoff ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 10:45:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Good luck rendering that in real time Edit: Well guess I underestimated modern GPU
Two-Tone- ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 10:48:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That is real time. It's all done on the GPU.
jamesaj23 ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 11:19:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I looked at them
i_706_i ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:34:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wish they had that in SOMA
CodeJack ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:06:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But I somehow doubt it would have stayed as such a smooth wave
BurtaciousD ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:56:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Exactly why. I watched a video before it came about just on the snow physics.
muffinmonk ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 06:40:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That wasn't pixar though.
BB8Droid ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 06:57:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Frozen was made by Disney animation
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:54:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How to Train Your Dragon 2 did snow and ice better. It makes Frozen snow and ice look like plastic.
BurtaciousD ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:01:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Idk, check this out. Also, I didn't see H2TYD2.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:15:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, looks like plastic.
IrrelevantLeprechaun ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 05:39:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I almost thought the story of Brave was hair. I can't even remember what that film was about. All I remember is hair.
It was an ultimately forgettable film with no lasting power. Indeed; just a tech demo for hair physics.
MasqueradeLily ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 08:29:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I really like Brave, personally. I dunno why people hate on it so much.
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 10:22:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Zuerill ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:04:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The focus of Brave was always gonna be about the mother-/daughter relationship. It may have been advertised to be a different thing but that's mostly why I don't watch trailers for anything anymore. As such, I really liked the movie, it has instantly become my favorite.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:06:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Zuerill ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:34:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As far as I know, Brenda Chapman was the one in particular who wanted the movie to be about the mother/daughter relationship. Although I'd say it's clear pretty early on that that's what the focus is on, I don't think that 15 minutes pass until they get into the argument of finding a suitor.
SodlidDesu ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:49:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In that case, Witcher 3 was a tech demo for hair! No story there, just them sweet sweet hairs.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:52:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That hair is awful.
Molomar ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:09:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be fair, Ho to Train your Dragon is a much better movie than Brave.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:54:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And a successful hair modeling demo at that. I would kill to have that hair (though red wouldn't be my color).
YZJay ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:10:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Toy Story: The one that started it all.
Bugs Life: Soil? Monsters Inc: fur tech. (Notice how Sully's the only one with hair?)
The Incredibles: I think it was skin.
Finding Nemo: Water.
Ratatouille: Subsurface scattering.
Cars: I think it was reflections or some form of lighting.
Brave: Hair physics.
Up: Cloud rendering.
Monsters U: Global Illumination.
That's all I could think of.
[deleted] ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 08:25:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
luckyleighton ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 12:46:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree, it was not a 5 star movie. It succeeded at being a simple enjoyable story. I am not sure why it gets so much hate, there is a lot of garbage released at the theater that is not worth people's time. If you have kids, and they like dinosaurs, they will love this movie.
kimjong-ill ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 05:54:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I might be the only person that would put this on par with Inside Out. I felt that IO was a great idea that was only very slightly explored, and featured a lot of easy or lazy decision making and overly-convenient characterizations (characters often responding to scenes as required to move the plot forward rather than how they might actually respond).
The ending also felt like a supreme deus ex machina, wherein they whip together some magic to cross the giant pit that seemed so insurmountable throughout the film. The last scene with the look in all the minds was one of the most enjoyable in the film, as was the husband/wife dynamic, which was spoiled in the previews.
Suffer_No_Fools ยท 61 points ยท Posted at 06:29:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Inside Out has only become richer and smarter and more moving to me as I've processed and revisited it. There's more going on in any random scene inside Riley's mind than in The Good Dinosaur as a whole. It's not a terrible movie, but it does feel slight, in spite of some genuinely impressive visuals.
I don't consider that a deus ex machina because it's of a piece with how Joy and Sadness overcome obstacles throughout their journey.
radicalelation ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 07:20:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is how I've been for the most part. I walked out of it finding it underwhelming, but as I've processed and contemplated, and revisited, I've since decided it's deserving of its critical acclaim.
While the plot is basic and (I too thought it) was resolved too suddenly, everything else is more complex than I first saw.
Tralan ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 06:30:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the Bus Driver all had variations of Anger that just exploded with everything.
i_706_i ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:36:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How I felt about Big Hero 6. It got a lot of praise and for a kids movie it's fine, but I wouldn't put it on the level of great story telling as some of Pixar's work.
PaterBinks ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:43:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually preferred it to Inside Out. Inside Out was funny and all, but it didn't really move me as much as The Good Dinosaur. Plus, the whole "lost-far-away-from-home-and-gotta-get-back" journey story was my cup of tea.
VMoney9 ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 03:03:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I could buy that. The plot is kind of "Black sheep son gets lost and has to find his way back. Shenanigans ensue," which I realize is basically the plot of of every Pixar movie, but this one just isn't as good.
vadrotan ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:15:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie is a real turd, especially by Pixar standards.
sorrynotme ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 12:38:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I kind of think it's a turd ONLY by Pixar standards. I really really loved it and many elements of it, but after watching it, I couldn't believe it had been a Pixar movie because it didn't have the same narrative ingenuity. It was just a regular kids movie, getting a lost [insert animal here] getting back home. It does that really well, but for Pixar, that's a pretty lazy story.
cyberdork ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:28:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The end credits pretty much show what this movie was about and what the crew was proud of.
CaptainPixel ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:44:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar is an amazing studio. I feel like there were a bit more amazing before the Disney buyout. Too many sequels now. But I digress.
You're half right. Pixar's main focus is story telling but they also aim to challenge the limits of CG with each new effort. As a result they develop a lot of technology.
Here's a page of the research papers they've published over the course of making their movies:
http://graphics.pixar.com/library/
One of the things I love about the CG industry is that is has this great focus on development. Whenever someone or some studio makes something awesome it's always "Yo! Check out this awesome thing! Here's how I did it!" rather than "Our company is the sole proprietor of awesome. Don't even think of mimicking our awesome or our legal department will tear you to shreds."
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:10:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
justlike james cameron avatar
snarpy ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 08:25:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A tech demo that absolutely destroyed me about half way through. I was in tears.
The end of the film doesn't hold up to this sequence (as per a lot of Pixar stuff) but holy shit.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:14:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That final scene with Spot and Arlo...fucking onions man.
Lobonaut ยท 168 points ยท Posted at 07:25:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
One of the animators visited my school last year, and paused at this http://i.imgur.com/2ziRc2y.png during the trailer. It was a 1.5 second cutscene of just the tree branches...."This was a concept shot that took us about a total of 1000 hours to do"
JamEngulfer221 ยท 73 points ยท Posted at 08:26:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's not too bad. 50 people, 20 hours each
twokiloballs ยท 75 points ยท Posted at 09:25:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You will make a good PM.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 09:54:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
God I hope not
______DEADPOOL______ ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 15:56:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Stuff him in the oragered envelop fellas!
rambocommando ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 13:52:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No, a good pm would have said 1000 people, have it done in an hour
wiithepiiple ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 18:34:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Probably more like 25 people, 1 week (40 hrs). At least that's what I tell myself, since I work as a programmer. In reality it was probably 12 people working 1 week ~80 hrs.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:33:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, I was really just approximating to get a reasonable number of hours
CodeJack ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:07:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well they didn't say man-hours
JamEngulfer221 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:44:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Man hours was kinda implied
DeadeyeDuncan ยท 67 points ยท Posted at 09:37:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
At that point, you have to wonder if someone thought to just find the highest resolution camera they could and just go and record some branches in the rain.
No one would ever know
whatisabaggins55 ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 14:26:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Would have been faster to just invent a time machine and go back in time to film some actual dinosaurs.
Darkseer89 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:11:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm curious... why did it take that long?
YZJay ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 13:16:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Modelling, animating, rendering, emphasis on the rendering.
mrbooze ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:45:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
On a tour of Pixar's data center I was on years ago, I was told that they're basic goal with computing power is to have enough such that an animator could send a job to rendering at the end of the day and it would be complete when he came back in the next morning. When they started to reach a point where they couldn't reliably achieve that, it was time to upgrade the server farm.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:01:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I love art, but at some point there is an amount of work you can put into it where it's not really impressive anymore. That's over 40 days, over twice that if you do it during work hours only (assuming 12 hour days. Gotta love animation).
dearhero ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:03:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wouldn't it be so weird to step into that world and find there's no actual wind or temperature. All the sensations are muted yet it's one of the most beautiful places you've ever seen. I'd trip balls.
Wilcows ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 13:17:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No offense. But anyone could do that with free software even. I've seen similar results in tutorials and shit. Maybe not animated but it's not that special.
A thousand hours is really easy to rack up too. Got a team of people to divide the hours over plus rendering time for every attempt. Sure it looks nice but I don't really get what they are on about
HatchCannon ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:10:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Care to share the free software title with access to this nice of shading/lighting. These shots are phenomenal all the same.
Wilcows ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:35:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For example you can use blender. And here's a random tutorial of something pretty similar to the still of the movie technically wise. http://youtu.be/jBjlsSHBLPs
If he put some more time into it he would've made something on the same level I'm sure.
HatchCannon ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:37:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Very nice!
Wilcows ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:44:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And that's one dude on his computer. Hence "what was Pixar trying to prove?"
HatchCannon ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:53:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
IDK I haven't seen the movie, I kinda lost interest after Brave I am waiting for Zootopia or Incredibles 2 they look promising.
Wilcows ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 14:56:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I haven't seen it either. I'm purely talking about that still and what OP said Pixar said about it.
Not much interest to watch this movie either but if I stumble upon it on tv one day I'll watch it.
droodic ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:22:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm assuming it's more an approximation of how long it took to render that scene. Idk much about it but I'm guessing for extremely high resolutions it can take a very long time to render
Wilcows ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:20:37 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
True true.
My_Body_The_Mystery ยท 187 points ยท Posted at 01:14:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The artists exploration of water especially was amazing. I just wonder why the dinosaur characters were so lopsided and uninspired though
MrCleanMagicReach ยท 100 points ยท Posted at 04:59:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was an artistic decision. The dinosaurs were meant to look like they didn't belong.
[deleted] ยท 61 points ยท Posted at 05:41:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well, they certainly achieved that. Considering that decision is at a deeper artistic level than most other elements of the movie, and that their appearance was disappointing compared to the landscapes, I wish they hadn't made that choice
ricerobot ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 16:27:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also, Arlo's design is just horrible. I don't remember any dinosaur with feet that look like they're being melted to the ground. Or his wonky ass knee joints that are 2x larger than his legs. Or the way he walked. Everything was just wrong.
I guess sticking him amongst that scenery was also a bit jarring. Sort of like seeing gumby in the Planet Earth documentary.
I mean they could have made him closer to the triceratops character and it wouldn't have been as bad. He was also fairly cartooney but didn't feel so out of place.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:39:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't that extreme, considering some of the environments were a little cartoons, but sometimes it came close
Dr_Who-gives-a-fuck ยท 124 points ยท Posted at 06:03:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The probably is many people think it was a bad artistic decision.
It being an "artistic decision" doesn't just make it ok. Anytime.
Beaun ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:28:43 on February 19, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
More than likely it was a marketing decision, easier to sell recognizable 'cartoony' dinosaurs than it is realistic dinosaurs that you can find anywhere.
RedofPaw ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:53:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And the humans also?
soulcaptain ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 10:30:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well, if you get too realistic with CGI humans, you run into the uncanny valley and viewers, in short, don't like it. Even the good Pixar (and Dreamworks) movies deliberately make the humans cartoonish and less real than they could. It's a balance you strike.
RedofPaw ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 10:44:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They're dinosaurs.
Meanwhile the people is not the style but the disparity between character and scene.
Avestier ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:49:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No, it was so they could sell more toys that resembled the characters better.
felipcai ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 11:58:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think if they made them look realistic then they'd come out like with live action animals that talk with their mouths moving. Making the dinosaurs look cartoonish saved them from that.
ashenfield ยท 65 points ยท Posted at 05:21:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was okay with the style choice for the dinos. The kids seemed to like them and it gave them an approachable cartoon feel.
My wife and I were blown away by the non-dino visuals. They were really amazing.
The story was odd and the flow was a little jumpy. My 8 year old said it felt like she was watching a bunch of episodes of a series stitched together.
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 10:13:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes, exactly. It was like two people were in charge of the movie and one person wanted it to be grim-survival-boy-and-his-dog and the other wanted it to be a campy-buddy-comedy-western-travel movie. And they had to compromise and both tried to keep the best parts and had to sacrifice crucial set up type scenes.
BabyLizard ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 09:14:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
sharp kid
MrCleanMagicReach ยท 119 points ยท Posted at 05:04:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For anyone who doesn't understand why the dinosaur animation looks decades behind the scenes of nature shown in OP:
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/10/15/the-good-dinosaur-could-be-a-big-miss-or-a-big-hit
TL;DR: It was a conscious decision to make the dinosaurs look like they don't belong, to echo the whole premise of the movie (what if dinos didn't go extinct?)
SodlidDesu ยท 56 points ยท Posted at 06:57:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, that feels too "after the fact" for me.
My son loved the movie, it was a good movie, who am I to judge/care?
PeacePP ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 10:30:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm pretty sure it was mentioned somewhere before the movie came out, I remember reading an article that I'm almost sure was about it.
PoshVolt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:00:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well the movie was complete before it came out. They knew people would point it out and decided to address it before putting it in theaters. Damage control.
mrbooze ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 17:39:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why? What possible reason do they have to give a shit about making up a trivially falsifiable story? They've conscripted the 600 other Pixar employees into keeping this terrible secret because for some reason one of the greatest animation houses on earth couldn't figure out how to animate realistic dinosaurs?
nospecialhurry ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:43:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's been a lot written about their decision and their thought process. Quite before the fact. For you and everybody.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:00:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That decision would have worked, if the movie actually was about why dinos don't belong, and the film was then about returning the world to what we think it should be.
The asteroid missing was a mere background premise for the film to explain why the dinos are still around. Continuing that theme into the film design was a mistake.
Random-Miser ยท -29 points ยท Posted at 05:21:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah that whole article is just pure bullshit. The real reason is that they already had a finished movie called "the good dog", and they went in and swapped out all the character models later on with dinosaurs instead of people.
Molomar ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 10:12:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That sounds incredibly false.
I remember reading an article about all of Pixar's next movies, and it predicted them all including Brave. The only one that didn't go through was Newt cause Rio was pretty much the same plot.
And on that list it was still called The Good Dinosaur.
Tralan ยท 25 points ยท Posted at 06:28:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fuckin' T-Rex cattle herders galloping like they were riding horses... I fucking lost it. Best scene in the whole movie. And the crazy mountain man with all the pets.
zesty_hootenany ยท 22 points ยท Posted at 16:20:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
"This is Dream Crusher. He protects me from having unrealistic goals."
Ridley-Knight ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:11:49 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I laughed twice during this movie and this was the time I laughed the least.
[deleted] ยท 45 points ยท Posted at 06:28:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well shit, I guess I'm the only person who liked this movie.
ColourfulBird ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 11:07:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked it too!
It isn't perfect, but it was visually beautiful, the character relationships were very realistic (especially the portrayal of a farming family), the realistic danger of nature and the few comedic moments were pretty great IMO.
It felt a bit like a Studio Ghibli film in regards to focus on nature and quiet scences without the need for constant dialogue, even when it's being funny (eg the gopher scene and the fruit scene)
TheMysticalWalrus ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 13:53:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought the movie was funny and cute. My girlfriend and I went watch it and we both loved it. Didn't realize most of Reddit strongly dislikes this movie.
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:17:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the movie, my only problem are the character design but i guess for kids the characters are lovable
Cynicbats ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:50:57 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I can see why someone wouldn't like it, but as someone who doesn't expect much from Pixar, this was honestly quite good.
EntoBrad ยท 164 points ยท Posted at 03:09:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the film. It was simple, beautiful and pretty relaxing to watch. Plus that poor guy just had a shit time. Everything went wrong for him. Most cartoons kids have bumps and scrapes, but he kept falling off cliffs and waterfalls. It was almost sadistic.
Sephiroth912 ยท 83 points ยท Posted at 07:24:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So The Revenant?
Lizard182 ยท 53 points ยท Posted at 07:31:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Now that you mention it, the two films do actually do have a similar feel to them.
tkornfeld ยท 27 points ยท Posted at 07:35:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, in a weird way that's true
ijustgotsick ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:35:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So tru
mrbooze ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:40:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's because the fundamental premise of both films is
manprotagonist vs nature.Gabermeister ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:05:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The Revenant happened in Montana and Good Dinosaur based on Wyoming landscape. The author of the Revenant is also from Wyoming.
instantanarchy ยท 64 points ยท Posted at 07:04:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I can only agree with you on one of these
Sea-Salt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:37:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, I think they wanted to balance out the cartoonish designs of the characters by just beating the everloving crap out of Arlo at every turn. Just wanted to give the poor guy a hug after a while.
smikwily ยท 40 points ยท Posted at 04:47:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My mom usually doesn't watch Pixar movies, but went with us as it was my son's first movie. When it was over, she asked me how much of the movie was made with computers.
It truely is a beautiful movie. The small filler/bumper shots of rain on leaves, etc and the closing credits just left me slack jawed. I always love seeing the small advancements they make and how that adds to future movies for Pixar. Fur, then wet fur, then Merida's hair. Light, then ambient light (glow into the dark Buzz), then the translucency of water in Nemo.
Watch Toy Story again and see where they started (or Tin Toy, etc.) and watch for their pushes per movie. I'd almost like to see a "remaster/re-render" of Toy Story 1 for an anniversary release. Don't go all Lucas on it, but just fresh paint/fur/light all around (and maybe fix that Buzz/car track loop hiccup ;)
All off their little advances make for some really cool big things.
THRlLLH0 ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 06:25:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes completely re-doing the visuals for TS1 is a waaaaaay better idea than making TS4 after they concluded it perfectly.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 08:21:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be fair, TS4 isn't a direct sequel. It goes back a bit.
solidangle ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 12:28:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The advancements in Computer Graphics (and more specifically in rendering) are truly amazing. It is an absolute joy each year to read the new papers presented at SIGGRAPH and at Eurographics (and their Symposium on Rendering). We've finally reached a moment in which new technologies make their way to the big screen in just a few years, whereas at it took 30 years before path tracing could be used in movies. Can't wait to see what the future holds for the industry.
cyberdork ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:40:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I can't wait for this kind of 3d quality in combination with VR reaching homes within the next 20 years.
whatisabaggins55 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:31:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As someone studying animation (including 3D graphics) I'm really excited as well.
adarunti ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:27:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What do you mean?
smikwily ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:13:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSmrDNp4Wf0
Buzz's wings would have hit the racetrack when he entered the loop and when he exited the loop. Since you only see him before, during, and after, it wasn't really an actual on screen blooper.
Just one of those animation blips that some noticed. Doesn't interfere with the movie itself, but makes your brain hurt a little bit ;)
[deleted] ยท 252 points ยท Posted at 00:55:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Its a shame they spent so much effort in landscape visuals instead of dinosaur design or script for the matter. I love pixar movies, but boy was it a letdown.
yellowstone10 ยท 139 points ยท Posted at 04:03:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dinosaur design, I'll chalk up to a deliberate artistic decision. But yeah, the script needed work.
Rdubya44 ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 06:55:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's a reason why this movie was postponed and rewritten. Polishing a turd.
jewellbsorry ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 10:03:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Which is why the landscapes were all so good, they got extra r&d time
tonytroz ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 07:12:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It worked for Toy Story 2... Couldn't save this one though.
LonleyViolist ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:42:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well that one wasn't exactly postponed on purpose...
champ64 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:00:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The visuals were stunning, but yeah the script ruined the movie for me. Inside Out gained much more praise because it was actually a good movie, script and visual wise.
myhihi1 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:36:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also Inside Out had some amazing cinematography.
isestrex ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:50:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The opposite is true. They spent way more on script and story, and they went through several re-writes and even a director change. The end result was a story that never worked no matter how much effort they put into it.
The landscapes are just the natural progression of that particular department doing better and better each film.
panicakess ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:40:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They actually used stills from the USGS and comped them together into a 3d environment. It looks so great because they're super hi-res photos.
SodlidDesu ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:55:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dinosaurs were close enough for my two year old to get, good enough for me.
make_love_to_potato ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:39:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's exactly what it was. A movie that only a two year old would appreciate.
Pritzker ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:00:36 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In all fairness, Disney had their hands on this one along with Pixar.
notascientistaz ยท 63 points ยท Posted at 06:10:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Spoiler One of the most depressing movies i have seen. He fails his dad, he gets his dad killed, he fails his mom and gets swept away in the river. It just keeps getting more and more depressing
RedofPaw ยท 89 points ยท Posted at 07:55:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, but he made it home in order to continue being a burden on his family, so at least he managed that.
[deleted] ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 10:01:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He did, however, get rid of the critter which was stealing most of their food.
brangaene ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 10:17:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And it was his sole task which he eventually finished.
Yokurt ยท 24 points ยท Posted at 09:46:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I always expected some kind of happy end, where the dinosaurs he met during his adventure somehow help to make the farm less work. Like using the buffalos to plow the field or the bird guy using his "collection" in some way.
But it's just "he fell in the river and came back", with the fear of starvation still being present. Weird.
epwnym ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 13:46:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Then you really weren't paying attention. When he first gets home and is walking wise and tall towards his mother as a silhouette, she first calls out the father's name. She mistook him for the role model he idolized. Arlo left a child and returned as a grown man who was now ready to run the farm.
Yokurt ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I ain't no farmer, but how much work do this them there silhouettes git done?
Rockburgh ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:45:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the idea was that after everything he'd seen he would be more capable of providing for his family. He became significantly more physically capable during his trip, and overcame most of his psychological issues as well.
dakky123 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 08:06:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the saddest scene is when Spot his explaining his situation in the sand. It was so calm yet sad at the same time.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:46:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was crying so hard. Just that silent expression of grief. It was so powerful.
VanSensei ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 08:04:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I got a HUGE Lion King vibe from it.
zesty_hootenany ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:17:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My 12 year old daughter and I said the same thing.
SLOTH_POTATO_PIRATE ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 07:01:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sam Elliott kills it though. Played his part very well.
onijin ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 08:30:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sam Elliott could narrate a 4 hour documentary on the color beige and still kill it.
angwilwileth ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 10:23:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenes with the T-Rex family were the only good parts of the movie.
I like how they made the herbivores farmers and the carnivores nomadic herders.
Yog_Kothag ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 07:04:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I may have cheered a little when he smashed into the rock in the river. I definitely had a grump-cat style "GOOD!" face at that moment.
TheScrawl ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:04:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I only saw the last few minutes and oh god it was so sad
grantmoore3d ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:23:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Plus he's a whiney bitch for half the movie, supper annoying.
JulianneLesse ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:13:46 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Everyone on Reddit is hating on it and here I am, I enjoyed it and it was honestly the closest a movie has ever been to making me cry
abra82 ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 06:37:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Underrated movie
akabbl ยท 92 points ยท Posted at 01:50:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
The dinosaurs must be really good farmers, judging by some of the serious agriculture and all them plants all lined up.
cvaphotography ยท 94 points ยท Posted at 04:12:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You must not have seen the movie...
akabbl ยท 47 points ยท Posted at 04:48:25 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nope which is why I judged from the pictures...
instantrobotwar ยท 44 points ยท Posted at 06:25:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Then you're in for a treat. In the movie the dinosaurs were farmers and it was just so fucking weird.
Equeon ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 07:49:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They also kept domesticated oviraptors, which for some reason acted just like chickens. Ironically, those dinosaurs would've probably been way smarter than the walnut-sized-brained sauropods.
It's some funky Goofy/Pluto conundrum.
Vlisa ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 11:51:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why are people always judging Goofy and Pluto for their kinky BDSM/exhibitionist relationship. It's brave and inspiring!
akabbl ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:13:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I dont know if you guys are joking or not, this sounds ridiculous haha
instantrobotwar ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:51:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Absolutely not joking.
Here's a picture of the main character carrying their crop (CORN) to their silo.
Yes, CORN, millions of years before it was genetically engineered to look like that, in completely the wrong type of region. And the T-Rexes were ranchers. Visually stunning, but I had my 'wtf' face on for the whole movie.
JosefTheFritzl ยท 19 points ยท Posted at 06:19:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You judged correctly. Picture like...a Little House on The Prarie type scenario...but with dinos.
make_love_to_potato ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 10:41:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Don't bother watching it. The movie is a turd by pixar standards.
KeenBlade ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 06:26:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a strange movie for me. The animation was probably the best I've seen yet, but the movie itself was oddly bland. It really didn't leave the impact that Pixar normally does. It's by no means bad, but it's not really amazing either.
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:07:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
BLAND, yes that is the perfect word for this movie. It was like someone mixed Ice Age and Land Before Time and White Fang all in one movie and then took out all the parts necessary for the plots to have any impact.
CityKat991 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 03:51:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenery was beautiful, the ending, not so much.
yeeerrrp ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 09:51:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The ending was so lame and abrupt lol
CityKat991 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:35:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was sort of like they gave up.
bobertacz ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 05:20:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tetons!!
veryillusive ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 06:37:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Loathe this movie. Farming dinosaurs? A main character that denies his friend a chance to meet his family because his quest isn't done yet? One screen writer and what, like seven other additional writers? "The good dinosaur" like the good book. Praise Jesus. Nice visuals, reducing your children's intelligence plot. Did I mention farming dinosaurs?
Equeon ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 07:53:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And at the end, he puts his mark on the silo right next to his mom and dad's marks. What exactly did he do to deserve that? Find his way home after getting lost on his own accord?
angwilwileth ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 10:25:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He finally succeeded in the last task his dad gave him. Getting rid of the critter that was eating all their food.
yeeerrrp ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:54:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He stopped being a little bitch in the process
veryillusive ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:55:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just loved the scene where he stated why he wanted his mark, and then two lines later say it's stupid and he doesn't want his mark. Clear character there folks, totally consistent.
zesty_hootenany ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:23:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some say it was his survival that was his "something big" that earned him the right to put his mark.
Others say that his assigned task was to get rid of the critter that was eating their corn. He did it, so, mark earned.
tocilog ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:21:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a decent children's movie that didn't do a lot of sugar-coating. The mark was to signify growth which Arlo did at the end of the movie. Life is hard, growth doesn't mean solving all your problems but gaining the ability to face it. Also, surprisingly a lot of death and killing. Anyway, not Pixar's best but still a good children's movie.
Hedhunta ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:22:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pretty sure the island in the middle of the river is the island from a bugs life. It looks the right shape and the trees are in the right place and look young and thin compared the old and thick trunks of a bugs life........ could be wrong though Pixar is known to do that kind of stuff.
bionix90 ยท 66 points ยท Posted at 01:39:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs look pretty atrocious and the story is lame as hell though.
Equeon ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 07:50:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I would have preferred a film just based off the lives of the T-Rex herders, in a true western style.
Like Rango, but with dinosaurs.
brangaene ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:09:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Maybe it's time for a spin off?
epwnym ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:42:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
God Rango was good. So good.
abigthirstyteddybear ยท -11 points ยท Posted at 07:46:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fuck yoouuuuuu suck my diick you dont know shit, there will be another Fast and Furious movie for you to jerk off to soon.
JamEngulfer221 ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 08:20:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think you are the one with the line opinion here. Everyone else thinks the story was kinda meh.
pdmavid ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:56:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't think every Disney/Pixar movie needs to be intellectually stimulating for adults and have toy story quality plot lines. It wasn't Frozen, Brave, or Wreck it Ralph quality, but my 4 year old enjoyed it and I was fine with it. At least it wasn't fucking chipmunks.
champ64 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:08:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I doubt that a 4 year old would care for great visual stimulation either though. The thing is Disney/Pixar have built a reputation of creating pieces of work that are enjoyed by both adults and kids alike. Obviously a kid will enjoy the movie regardless of plot line or realistic visuals, but the adults have a certain expectation usually. Quality is quality, no matter what audience you're going for. Kids enjoy the chipmunks movies too, btw.
pdmavid ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 17:16:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I agree and have those same expectations. However I know not every movie can be the pinnacle of movie making and I don't think the good dinosaur was that "atrocious" or "lame."
Mercury756 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:35:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I seriously thought they were live action shots with crappy dinosaurs animated over it I was flabbergasted when I found out that it was animated.
Yog_Kothag ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:59:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Too bad about the rest of it (the dinosaurs).
THE_ULTIMATE_RAPIST ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 00:08:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
2real4me
8483 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 08:54:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This movie was amazing. I actually like the discrepancy between the gorgeous landscapes and the weird cartoony dinosaurs.
I love how everyone complains about the character design being stupid while every review on IMDB is bitching on the fact that the movie was scary as fuck to kids.
I laughed so hard when the pterodactyls "saved" the cute fox. I also really liked the meth raptors. The best WTF moment was the hallucination part.
Swamp_Troll ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 05:10:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Plot and design? Well everybody commented on that, I agree with most. But I watched it after too many drinks and such with buddies, and it made it so much better. We were in complete awe at the landscapes and soundtrack too.
DrunkCried like a little bitch too at parts, and you know which ones. Toys Story 3 didn't even do that to me, yet the ugly dinos managed somehow
Kareemofwheet ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:32:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Looks like some insane skyrim mod.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:43:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Honestly the movie would be better if it were just an hour and a half a peaceful CGI backdrops and maybe some relaxing music.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 06:48:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I remember the big fuss everyone made about A Bug's Life. How revolutionary it was to have each blade of grass moving on its own.
Yeah life was simple back then. Back then when you heard a Pixar movie was coming out you knew it was going to be good... sigh
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 15:49:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The artstyle to this movie is such a mess, like someone really pushed the boat out on the landscapes which are photoreal but then the characters look like absolute ass.
Gives it such a strange uncanny valley feel, like the opposite of the polar express
BirdLawSpecialist ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 02:12:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Definitely not my favorite Pixar movie ... hell, it's not even in the Top 5 for me, but worth watching for the scenery alone. Some of the most beautiful visuals I've ever seen in any movie.
plagues138 ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:12:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I found it weird that the landscapes are so detailed, and the characters were so cartoony.
ZeNorseHorseSleipnir ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 06:23:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How does DreamWorks get away with it... Oh yeah, HD Textures. I liked this movies but I can't deny Pixar's character texture techniques are sorta dated. Compare How to Train Your Dragon or Rise of the Guardians, which had Character Models that were cartoony, but still had enough detail to not look like a Unity Asset Flip.
Renshnard ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 04:26:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I fricken love this movie.
Lyerak ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:21:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenery is so wonderful it's upsetting to see such talent be wasted on poorly thought out dinosaur designs. That's not to say I've watched it, but I've seen enough screenshots of the movie to tell that it isn't something I'd be interested in putting up with. Although, the screenshots in the link make me want to rethink that decision. Purely for the sake of the background art. I'd bet they would have received a LOT more revenue if they would have just put a little more effort into the actual dinosaurs.
rae919 ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 03:51:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw this movie with my daughter and I thought it was very cute, surely not as good as Toy Story, but really, what is? I think the dino's animation sucked though, seriously. Disney's Dinosaur looked lightyears ahead of this movie and it was almost two decades ago. edit, spellcheck is bollocks
aocom ยท 20 points ยท Posted at 05:35:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
http://i.imgur.com/RLXGD46.png
-MjD- ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 07:39:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Maybe it was a subtle joke
[deleted] ยท 24 points ยท Posted at 06:26:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's similar to the expression "streets ahead" except on a much larger scale
scottbarnes43 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:48:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If you have to ask, you're light years behind.
THRlLLH0 ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 06:21:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So his usage was still correct then?
OrangeredValkyrie ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:29:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Picture the two movies in a race.
HungryKoalas ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:35:26 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So something can't be miles ahead from something else then?
ILikeChillyNights ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 08:04:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Could be distance along a time line. Rekt?
tonytroz ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:15:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar has at least 6 or 7 movies on Toy Story's level, including the sequels. Sadly this movie seems like a flop just because they set the bar so high. This is closer to Cars 2.
DRL21 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 04:57:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I know! One reason why I have no interest in seeing this movie because the dinosaur animation is soooo bad and cartoony when the landscapes are photorealistic.
Dinosaur did it all so much better!
SodlidDesu ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 07:01:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just go see it..
It's good. The good dinosaur may not break ground but for my two year old it was awesome (not like a hotdog) and he day quietly.
Everyone has to have a "first" movie and the good dinosaur fit that bill for my little man.
SkepticShoc ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:46:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's honestly beyond me why such gifted animators opted for such a silly carroonish design for their dinosaurs. I mean jeez, the Land Before Time had better looking dinosaurs.
inthedark72 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:50:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
amazing visuals, unfortunately it was my least favorite pixar movie
Spocks_Goatee ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 04:06:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Funny how a company known for mostly cartoony/stylistic CGI has better landscapes than most major FX houses.
Oldsodacan ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:32:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar created Renderman which is one of the most licensed 3D renderers out there. They created the engine that renders the photorealistic looks that other FX houses create. Creating their own films wasn't what the company was originally created for. Create created creating crate ate.
wingzero00 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:03:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Didn't disney also create a new rendering service for Big Hero 6?
ZeNorseHorseSleipnir ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:24:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yep, Hyperion. I think the Art Direction in BH6 was better.
ender52 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 05:13:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Their characters are stylized, but the landscapes and sets have always been incredibly photorealistic for their time
parallacks ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:29:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
anyone seen any high resolution version stills anywhere?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:22:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not until Disney releases a 4k Bluray.
GryffindorGhostNick ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:42:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought this was part of the reason why the movie was....weird for some reason.... The background was hyper-realistic and the dinosaurs looked like happy meal toys...
Mtwat ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 07:10:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I long to live in a naturally beautiful place.
jupiterfalling ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:21:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Most of these landscapes were based on places in Wyoming. I've actually climbed Ship Rock which is in Hyattville/Medicine Bow, for example. If you truly want to visit or live in such a place, all of it exists, and some of it is as empty and vast as the pictures portray. I grew up in Wyoming and I've never found anywhere else nearly as beautiful.
Mtwat ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:52:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'll keep that in mind. Seriously I want to live somewhere where I feel like I could fall into the sky.
nutmegtell ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:16:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I saw the first Pixar short- the one with the light- at a film festival in 1986. Luxo Jr. I really loved it and it always stuck with me. I thought of it every time I saw a similar desk light. I thought it was the best stop motion animation I'd ever seen. A light that had feelings! So cool.
Took me until 2005 to realize it was computer generated and the same as THAT Pixar. That took my breath away. I saw a glimpse of the future and had no clue. Those people are genius, so far ahead of their time.
SexCLexy ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:29:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So my sister and I just finished watching this movie.... The detail in the backgrounds were amazing ... At one point I even said I wanted to go swimming in there lol. But I couldn't get over how much it reminded me of The Lion King
jupiterfalling ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:26:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I said it in another comment, but most of these places really exist! If you have the money to travel to Wyoming, you can literally experience these all for yourself. Most are from the Yellowstone/Teton areas, but there are a few plucked from the Big Horn Mountains, the flatlands, and I'm sure that some of those are Black Hills as well. Wyoming is one of the most beautiful places in the country and it's almost completely untouched by man. I strongly recommend visiting!
Oddwin ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:37:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually for the first time ever felt really let down by a Pixar film. I felt it was way too predictable, formulaic, and just plain lazy.
Thought the stoner triceratops had me lol'ing. The rest of it just left me with a weird empty feeling.
I also noticed that there was a LOT of full on killing and it was very brutal killing.. seemed out of place.
lastcowboyinthistown ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 08:39:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually watched this film yesterday, and i really enjoyed it, thought it was quite mature emotionally for a film aimed at children
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:06:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought it was less mature than their previous movies. Really kind of forced the sad event in the beginning in a really unbelievable way.
bardicfury ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 09:45:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was worth seeing for the scenery alone.
The characters and story was bog standard but the scenery was BEAUTIFUL.
romericanesc ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 10:01:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
well, that was obviously made with Bryce 3D
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:04:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, and harassment.
If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.
Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possibe (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
Also, please consider using Voat.co as an alternative to Reddit as Voat does not censor political content.
AcidBathVampire ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 13:30:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Somebody should repost this in /r/EarthPorn and see if anyone notices.
plexomaniac ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:53:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
"Someone" did it. Took a while to someone notice it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/comments/45lub8/yellow_forest_ithaca_new_york_1403x590px_by/ (90 karma)
https://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn/comments/45oc9q/morning_mist_yosemite_national_park_1403x590px_by/ (101 karma)
I'm pretty sure that if I had posted a very realistic CGI girl on /r/gonewild they could keep her there.
AcidBathVampire ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:42:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh, wow. I'm not very original, it seems. That first one really looks fake, though, someone wasn't trying too hard.
plexomaniac ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:51:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
/r/EarthPorn is full of heavily post-processd HDR pictures that look more fake than that. They upvote anything.
I got banned obviously.
knightofni76 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:33:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Those valleys are a tad.... Uncanny.
bumbletowne ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 15:53:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The plants are wrong for the dino era.... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Drsweetcum ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 17:57:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I have a theory that this movie was made with the sole purpose just to test the new software they have.
PerryHelion ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 20:29:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You know what else is amazing about this movie? The soundtrack! It's such an evocative score that makes it really feel like a classic Western. "Homestead" and "Run With the Herd" are my favorite selections that show how powerful the movie's soundtrack is.
The Good Dinosaur is an underrated movie. With its breathtaking landscapes, an iconic score, the clever Western motif, and a plot that doesn't pull any emotional punches, in my opinion the movie doesn't get enough credit.
ttstte ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 03:46:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Very cool, when is this film coming out?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 12 points ยท Posted at 03:55:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was released in November in US
Cynicbats ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:00:28 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In the US, it'll be on home video in a week.
mariow08 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 04:45:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This movie deserved a Best Cinematography nomination. If CG backgrounds of Life of Pi and Gravity could win, animated movies must count too!
SLOTH_POTATO_PIRATE ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:56:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked this movie more than anything Disney has released in the past 5 or 6 years.
Sea-Salt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:47:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not to put down The Good Dinosaur (I really enjoyed it), but seriously? Out of Tangled, Wreck-it Ralph, Frozen, and Big Hero 6, not one of those has impressed you? Disney's come a long way with their own 3D offerings since crap like Chicken Little (it helps that both Pixar and Disney's animation studios are now run by the same guy).
aerodeck ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 02:06:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Gorgeous movie with way more feels than I expected.
ArtGamer ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:18:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
modern children movies/cartoons/shows TLDR: unexpected feels everywhere
ACID_pixel ยท 15 points ยท Posted at 03:13:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Totally not related, and I haven't seen the film yet. But I just asked a girl if she'd go see it with me tomorrow. Wish me luck.
EDIT: well boys, she says has Spanish homework and a basketball game. But she would love to reschedule. Looks like I'll be staying home and watching Bob's Burgers instead. Maybe I'll order some pizza.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 03:18:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Good luck mate. Not a great story, but it's a cute movie to see with a crush.
JustOneSexQuestion ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:59:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How come it's still showing on your theater?
Good luck, by the way.
ACID_pixel ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 04:16:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dollar Theater, I'm a cheap date
Random-Miser ยท -10 points ยท Posted at 05:18:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Go see literally anything else. Even at a dollar the movie is a rip off.
Bludgeon_4_Bacon ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 06:41:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
movie was not that bad
Random-Miser ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 06:51:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was the worst Pixar movie ever made, and actually worse then any Dreamworks movie ever made as well.
roadrunner440x6 ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 06:50:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Don't listen to the hater. It's a great movie to see in the theater for the visuals alone. Story may not be the best from Pixar, but it beats the hell outta most of the major studio rehashed garbage we get.
Random-Miser ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 05:17:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Go see deadpool instead, the movie is awful.
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 01:45:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I can't wait till games look this good. That might be 30 years from now though...
roadrunner440x6 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 06:52:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Gonna take a f**k-ton of GPU and CPU power for that!
ZeNorseHorseSleipnir ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 06:26:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Most likely less. A lot of game engines today are trying to recreate Pixar and Disney's rendering tech in real time. I'd say in about 10 to 15 years Console games will look like this and run decently. PC games 2-5.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 10:01:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
ZeNorseHorseSleipnir ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:28:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watch the Unreal Kite Demo.
freeway986 ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 10:01:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Rekt.
Did I do it right?
jakedean321 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:28:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If I had no idea what the film was about and you showed me those images I would assume it was another wild Terrence Malick film haha.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:48:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Those landscapes in TGD make me want to reedit the trailer in the fashion of The Revenant.
IcePopBandit ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:06:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Drop dead gorgeous film. Highly recommended for visuals alone.
nem012 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:20:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Real world seems boring now. T_T
NooMoahk ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:20:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
These scenes were mostly copied from actual geological data. You can visit most of the places in real life; they're mostly copied from US national parks. Except you can't see them from many of these angles because the parks banned drones.
Edit: http://www.wired.com/2015/12/design-fx-good-dinosaur/
nem012 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:22:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wooow; Only been to te U.S. once. I can see now that there is a lot more to love. Thanks for providing the info and that awesome link! P.s.: I was planning on visiting Yosemite & know now to get a permit from "the associate director for Visitor and Resource Protection."; +1 for the heads-up! =)
NooMoahk ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:43:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think the parks went after drones because TBS chased an eagle or something. Seemed like bullshit to me. One of these videos is from the visit, I can't recall which.
WittyViking ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:28:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I havent seen the film but why are there yaks/bison things in the dinosaur era?
deejayoptimist ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:30:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The movie starts off as if the meteor never hit Earth, so the dinosaurs never went extinct.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:06:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs missed the earth. dinos now live along with more modern animals. even though that makes no sense because dinosaurs would just kill of modern animals. buuut.... its just a silly pixar movie so its not a big deal.
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:59:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The meteor never hit earth. They show you that and the assumption you have to make is "what if dinosaurs didn't go extinct?" in order to justify a movie where man and dinosaurs exist at the same time.
ujelly_fish ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:08:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
"What if dinosaurs didn't all die" is the premise of the movie
tori_chibi ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:46:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
THANK YOU. Ive been wanting to show off this movie to everyone who didn't get a chance to see it and its just a gorgeous movie, even though the plot was mostly blah.
babyeatingdingoes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:01:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I told so many friends/coworkers to go just for the backgrounds. Just won't be the same on a smaller screen and they really were worth sitting through the plot for (plus Spot was cuter than expected. Maybe it's cuz I'ma dog person?). None of them listened to me though (and we work at the cinema, so it would have been free).
stickyspidey ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:58:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Reminded me of the revenant for some reason
roadrunner440x6 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:58:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The landscapes were incredible with the production team paying very close attention to detail; the kind of stuff you don't necessarily notice, but would notice it's absence. I found this video clip very telling.
ETA- I don't see why all the hate on the story. It is a movie that is meant to be viewed by children so they're not going to give you some overly complex plot that kids are going to be asking "why did he..." "what does this..." every five minutes. Even with that, they manage to tell a pretty good story albeit very sad. I teared up more than once, and if a cartoon can make a grown man cry, I'd say it was pretty effective.
Yogrumpus ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:02:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Looks a lot like California.
What does the Good Dinosaur do? What makes him/her good?
ColourfulBird ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:11:24 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The studio studied US National Parks for reference.
Arlo (the Good Dinosaur) learns to grow up from being afraid of everything and become a reliable member of his farming family.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:00:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's in Wyoming. Get lost and get back again.
docfluty ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:09:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Im a photographer and throughout the whole movie I was only looking at the shadows and sharpness of the grasses.
The story was a complete let down... but i couldn't take my eyes of it just to see the landscapes.
barmpotm666 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:10:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs look pretty atrocious and the flow was a snow physics demo.
moxy801 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:24:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pretty but do not jibe with the character designs at ALL.
HlfNlsn ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:35:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Absolutely stunning visually, but The Good Dinosaur was my least favorite Pixar movie ever. I didn't like the story, and there were some scenes that were so un-Pixar-like that it pulled me out of the movie.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:45:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It bothered me that there was so much inconsistency between the dinosaur designs and the buffalo and birds and shit.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:56:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Even between dinosaurs and lizards. The lizards are very realistic.
nolamb ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:46:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was genuinely unsure if they used real landscapes and added the CGI stuff later. I remember watching the trailer and getting enthralled by the quality of the dirt on the ground.
Ewaan ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:18:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I went to see this film and honestly thought Pixar had shot real world locations and added CG models on top of those landscapes.
benhww ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:29:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs really spoilt this movie!
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:44:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just watched this again after seeing this post. Manly tears were shed.
moanrigid90 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:45:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL OF THE DINOSAURS? SNIFFLE
InfectedP0tato ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:13:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
God fucking dammit this movie had me crying 10 minutes in. Wtf Pixar this is a kids movie holy hell.
spectrosoldier ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:15:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Unpopular opinion: I actually really enjoyed the film. It wasn't Pixar's best by a long shot, especially compared to Inside Out, but it was still enjoyable and better than some of the other stuff they'd put out as of late.
alvarisle ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:23:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
took little niece to watch it, ended up crying. I liked it, the movie was also beautiful
nascentt ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:19:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
She hated the the look for the dinosaurs too then?
alvarisle ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:23:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
my writing good!
Bladamir ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:29:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ten years ago you could look at Pixar movies and dream about when video games would look like that. That gives me a crazy amped feeling about these images.
ArniePalmieTime ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:31:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Late to tris thread so this will never be read, but I found the plot to be a bit insulting. The dinosaurs farming, humans living alongside, the accents all mid western red stater. It all struck me as being crudely creationist and going after that market.
captainduck2 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:34:38 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I love Pixar. I love Dinosaurs. Somehow they still let me down.
blacknight334 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:35:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Probably going to get a bit of hate for this. In my opinion, I really felt that the scenery and the very odd artistic choice for the dinosaurs were quite visually spectacular. But its seems that they spent too much of the budget on the visuals instead of a solid writing team. Not to the standard which I would have personally expected from pixar, but each to their own I suppose.
kenoxite ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:36:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's almost Crysis level.
ludlology ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:41:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Even better, a lot of it is inspired after real things. I think it was set in Wyoming. The mountains he heads for (three peaks) look almost like a range I can see from my parents house called sawtooth mountain. Many of the other settings look super wyomingy too
April_Fabb ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:43:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't have a particular interest in The Good Dinosaur, however seeing these shots, I just realised how much I'd enjoy a BBC/Planet Earth-like movie (complete with Attenborough) visualised by Pixar.
awBrickBuilder ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:44:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
/r/EarthPorn
anothertrad ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:56:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why the movie looks blurish in the big screen? I just went to a shitty place or that's how it works? First time I saw it in 3D didn't notice. But I went to see it again no 3D and it was so blurish.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:03:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Projector lens maybe?
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:58:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is the only reason to watch this movie. The movie itself is not one of their best. I was surprisingly disappointed. It was like it was written by fans of Pixar rather than Pixar writers.
I'm hoping this is just a test run for them and their next movie will reclaim some of that Pixar magic.
The animation and scenery were gorgeous though.
Teid ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:01:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The visuals of this movie made it worth it. The story felt oddly paced and not very well executed but I was also seeing this movie with friends so that might have devalued it a bit. Still a gorgeous movie and worth it for just the visuals alone.
brangaene ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:25:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The better cgi gets the more we forget that these "places" are made up from scratch.
jaycfresh ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:51:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Hey actually used USGS topographical data of Jackson Valley Wyoming as a starting point. http://io9.gizmodo.com/how-pixar-changed-all-the-rules-to-make-the-good-dinosa-1735364564
cortanabae ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:27:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
...what if Firewatch looked like this?
ballthyrm ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:34:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Five thirty eight did a great podcast about this
lulmonkey ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:47:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wish my life looked like this everyday
indigo0086 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:47:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar movie, or incredible backgrounds, you decide.
The_Real_Abe_Lincoln ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 11:50:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
These look like basic screenshots from the movie, nothing special.
Vincku ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:12:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The water is amazingly done. And this is the hardest thing to CGI'ed.
odysseus00 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:19:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That was EXACTLY what i was thinking while watching that movie, beautiful CGI. It almost looked real
munchkinmommy ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:24:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
These are like photos, but better.
peanutismint ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:29:30 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As a huge Pixar fan TGD was a bit of a disappointment to me, but the artwork more than made up for it. I'm still trying to work out whether some of the introductory shots (such as in the 2nd/3rd images) were fully CG or reality, or some kind of composite mix of both..... Truly stunning.
chepnut ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:34:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The scenery looked so real that when the dinosaurs were on the screen it looked super fake. It's as if they used footage from a planet earth type series and just slapped cgi over it
fer_sure ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:43:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think Pixar has discovered the inverse of the Uncanny Valley.
puftich ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:37:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Worst Pixar movie since Cars. And Cars at least sold a fuckload of merchandise. It's like they took a story about a cowboy kid getting lost in wild west and just turned the characters into dinosaurs and humans into dogs for some reason.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:45:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
IMO Cars is much better than TGD. Cars 2 is the worst Pixar movie ever.
guptas92 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:42:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Summoners Rift in 10years.
Kotev ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:45:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I honestly thought it was better than Inside Out, despite the uninspired design of the dinosaurs themselves. It had a shit ton of heart.
LordKingCucumber ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:45:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Godly awful movie tho
JosefStallion ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:46:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It is amazing how much Pixar has progressed since Toy Story.
syrindigo26 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:47:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Man, this makes me want to see a Pikmin movie.
Momochichi ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:48:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, while watching this my friend and I couldn't help but say aloud "At this point, Pixar is just bragging about its background CGI tech."
Maximus-city ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:49:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a shame that the same amount of talent and effort wasn't put into the script .....
beefJeRKy-LB ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 12:59:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I found the landscapes jarring with the rest of the movie's aesthetic. One of the many reasons I didn't like the movie.
Aaennon ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:11:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Welp, looks like I've found my wallpapers for the next 10 years
plette64 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:20:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Who else came here expecting scenery from the Dinosaur old movie from Disney... :(
This is also beautiful though.
mangafeeba ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:30:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
You looked at the stars
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:43:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Because it's CGI. Very realistic computer-generated landscapes.
NeekGerd ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:31:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Weirdly enough this movie really felt short on everything except for the stunning visuals that really were life like...
This movie should have been a 15min short.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:41:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Or they could remove all dinosaurs and make a 2 hour screensaver.
LetterTwenty7 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:34:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
great stuff! just saw the movie, and it's something i want my kid to see. it also made my gf cry.
Shackled_Form ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:35:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pitty it's all ruined by the terrible looking dinosaurs
Peabush ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:35:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watched it last night. Great visuals. But the story was lacking in some way. I especially thought the ending was too quick. "returns, sets his mark, fade to credits" Not pixars best, it is somewhere around a bugs life and monsters university.
Speech500 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:47:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I wonder what country that would be today.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:01:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
US
Speech500 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:23:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How do you know that?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:29:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The 2nd image clearly is Beartooth Butte Formation, WY. The entire movie is based on actual USGS data of the northwest. Pixar reconstructed 64,600 square miles of North America.
http://www.slashfilm.com/making-of-the-good-dinosaur/
Speech500 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:54:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
That sounds like something they would do. Almost all Pixar movies seem to be set in America, yet they're still one of the better animation studios when it comes to diversity in setting. It's almost admirable that they set it in America before America even existed. They must really like America.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:29:51 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some are for sure, like Toy Story, Cars, The Incredibles, Inside Out and Big's Life and now The Good Dinosaur.
But a lot are set in other countries. Ratatouille is in France, most of UP is in South America, Finding Nemo is in Australia, Brave is in Scotland, Cars 2 is all around the world.
Also, a big part of Wall-e is on space while the other part we are not sure if it's in America. The same for Monsters Inc (looks like they can open doors all around the world).
Speech500 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:50:30 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eh, Monsters Inc takes place in America if America had monsters instead of people. Especially Monsters University, which takes place in what is basically an exact replica of an American university.
But I see your point.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:16:57 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They likely live in another dimension. This is why they travel to our dimension by doors.
pedomojado ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:51:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pic#2, Beartooth Butte, WY/MT.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:52:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why the fuck are you discriminating against Dinosaurs? MLK didn't die for this shit.
mossberbb ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:54:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
anyone spot the pizza planet truck?
dsmx ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:56:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Did you know there was no grass when dinosaurs roamed the earth.
AllOfTheDerp ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:58:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I remember seeing this and very distinctly remember thinking, "I thought this was animated?" during the opening shots. Absolutely incredible work.
efciem ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:00:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I envy the artists who worked on these.
Oh how I envy them.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:00:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:26:05 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, but then they had to have voices and it could be pretty weird.
AMS0C ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:01:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What did you all think of the good dinosaur?
darkshadenl ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:06:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I liked the movie. The landscape was so realistic that the dinosaurs themselves felt out of place. I wondered if there is ever going to be a movie like 'dinosaur' again. That was for me the ultimate dinosaur based movie with a good mix between visual and story. Especially with the computer power we have now compared to back when it was released (in 2003 or something)... I just wish some director took a shot at it.
BuddhasPalm ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:08:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Man, i cannot wait until the average game looks this good
tylerjo1 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:08:58 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I need those trees in my games. They look so nice.
MatthieuJgagne84 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:09:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Stunning!! Reallly really beautiful.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:09:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why can't video games look like this yet?
Buck1286 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:17:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They could if they were all cut scenes like the order 1886. With the best most expensive computer you can build, you can actually play some games that look close to this.
bukithd ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:12:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a pretty good movie but enjoyed the cg here more than avatar
ArtGamer ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:12:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
this movie was a visual orgasm too bad the character design was so mediocre :/
lannister80 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:15:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What the fuck was up with the quasi-triceratops scene, with all his little creatures?
My wife looked at me after that scene was over, and said "Well, that was weird".
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:23:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think it was like a cat lady, but they didn't developed the character.
lannister80 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:44:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah, it was a short (weird) scene and I kept expecting him to pop back up, but he never did. It wasโฆjust odd.
DanCTapirson ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:15:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just like the movie
bootlegoutkast ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:18:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I fucking loved this movie!
floridavet ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:18:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It cracks me up when people act like Pixar dropped the ball by making the dinosaurs cartoony. Like some how they ran out of time making the scenery so they cut corners on the dino designs. It was a stylistic choice. It was on purpose. You don't have to like it but don't act like it was laziness. Nature is that antagonist in the movie and they wanted it to look photorealistic. They wanted to make chracters like Arlo child-like. I really enjoyed the movie. In no way was it one I would rewatch for years to come like Toy Story but it had a good (though rehashed story) that was entertaining.
JNorm2112 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:20:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eighth down is awesome. Cloud shadows show dinosaurs.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:48:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't get it.
JNorm2112 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:31:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Whoops.... Meant the shadows cast by the trees outline dinosaur shapes. Pretty awesome.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:36:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yeah. You are right. This is the only image I altered (using 2 distinct frames) to remove the dinosaur because the angle is amazing.
Good finding.
DistiIIer ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:42:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually just watched this the other day and the whole time I was thinking how fantastic the animation was, especially the water animations.
summerseabreeze ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:43:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As much as I wanted to like the movie, I just couldn't seem to bond with the characters/story very well. I loved the gorgeous scenery/visuals though. I can't quite describe what didn't work for me.
s4in7 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:56:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Technically, the movie's a stunner. Some interesting facts:
One scene of Good Dinosaur is composed of as much data as the entirety of Cars 2.
The majority of the USGS and Google Earth data focused on translating Wyoming's Grand Tetons to screen.
64,000 total miles of American landscape were translated to screen
More backgrounds than any Pixar movie before are actual geometry rather than matte paintings.
MattyASadowski ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:56:35 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a great flick, but such a rip off of The Land Before Time
Masoner79 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:03:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
too bad the film is one of the worst things (IMO) that studio has ever released.
Quobble ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:14:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I want this terrain in Minecraft now.
btw. I am 12 years old.
Deepcrater ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:21:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I think the dinosaurs were made to be toys, simple and easy to push out. They can make better dinosaurs without getting too serious just look at Rex from Toy Story.
jackwald ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:22:23 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
These are great, especially the ones with water. Really makes me want to go watch this movie, even if just for the animation
AwildLLAMA ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Has better graphics than real life...
TerdSandwich ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I mean what do you expect when you have control over every little leaf and piece of rock? Which actually makes compositions look too forced some of the time.
Apollo3519 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:23:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs looked so cartoony, which is obvious considering its Pixar, that they really stood out and clashed with the realistic look of the animated world. It kinda didn't fit together and kept me distracted through most of the movie.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:26:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar Universe MMO please.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:34:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Beautiful CGI! It's a shame the dinos were so dorky-looking and the plot was so bad.
kittykittysnarfsnarf ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:40:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The grande Tetons and Yellowstone are amazing
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:43:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Anyone complaining about the contrast between the realistic backdrops and cartoon characters needs to realize that's something Disney has been doing since Snow White. Gorgeous backdrops, with cartoon characters. Check out Sleeping Beauty -- this is over 20 years after Snow White, and really brings the point home, truly a pop art masterpiece. And that's what Pixar is doing, I suppose it could be labeled as pop art in a sense.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:59:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's not the same. In Sleeping Beauty, the contrast between characters and the background is not so high. Even Pixar did it before in Ratatouille. Paris is almost realistic while the characters are pretty cartoonish. The difference is exactly the "almost". They did it in the exact measure.
In Ratatouille, Paris is very detailed, but it doesn't look like a picture. You can tell for sure it's not a live action movie. The same happens in Sleeping Beauty. Could be very weird if Disney used a real photography with the Sleeping Beauty painted over it.
But in The Good Dinosaur, the background is perfect like the real thing. If you put a real actor on it, you can't tell it's CGI. But the characters are very cartoonish. Maybe even more cartoonish than in Ratatouille. So the contrast is much high. The contrast in TGD is comparable to Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:30:19 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
I still think it's comparable. It's about level of detail. The characters have less detail than the backdrops.
Edit: that's what makes the characters pop
assuming-arguendo ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:49:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So what Skyrim mod is this?
TheBelt ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:52:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Did anyone else think this movie fucking sucked?
ThePantryMaster ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:05:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This film was just trope after trope
curiousgeorge84 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:20:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What is the job that creates these scenes? Animators? Computer scientists? Did they go to school, and if so in what?
Mareykan ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:27:37 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They used the power of GIS, it's a field in Geography that focuses on Mapping stuff using a computer.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:55:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If you see the credits, they have a lot of specialists. Damn, they even have two "volumetric clouds artists". Yeah, you can have a graduation in Creative Arts, Visual Effects or something like that, but I'm pretty sure many Pixar's artists are pioneers in this area. They basically practically invented it.
Dreamliss ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:24:28 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I took a 70 year old man on the edge of senility to see this movie. He loved it, but we got into an argument as to whether or not the dinosaurs were inserted into real footage. To prove that they were, he got out some National Geographic magazines and pointed at the photos. I gave up after a few minutes of this, but damn they made realistic landscapes.
Realsorceror ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:27:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well of course. They have to make their Young-Earth propaganda look pretty.
PiranhaBazooka ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:33:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well those are going to have Dreamworks running for their money.
HazyAstronaut ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:33:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
These look incredible! Haven't seen the movie but was wondering, did Pixar leave any clues for their next film like they're known for doing?
rafikiknowsdeway1 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:37:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
i still hate the way that fucking dinosaur looks though
houghfullpuff ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:38:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Too bad the movie itself was fucking awful.
Tumorhead ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:42:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
All the scenery compositions fit in a few consistently repeated categores - based around diagonals from corner to corner of the screen. It starts with a lot of one of those diagonals and then switches to the other direction. Then we get lots of center horizontal compositions, and then a set with jagged teeth, and other various patterns. The effect that causes is really interesting!
enginears ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:45:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Should i watch the movie? It looks beautiful, but i wasn't sure if story held up as well.
XxThumbsMcGeexX ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:45:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was so let down when I saw the dinosaur models. All of the enthusiasm the trailer had built up died as soon as I saw how cartoony they looked. It totally took me out of the world they'd created, that was a terrible design choice.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:51:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Eventually graphics will get good enough that someone will finally create a world that is sufficiently realistic such that no one else will ever have to create one again. Everything will be placed in that world.
lordzelo ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:58:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
15, when it starts to rain, was one of my absolute favorite shots in the movie. It was done so beautifully.
bdAZ77 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:17:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Too bad the dinosaurs wrecked this movie. Character design in this one was just awful and ruined it for me IMHO.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:25:44 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just saw this movie. It felt like an animation showcase more than a movie.
GreenAce92 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:26:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cool
curioush91 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:30:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Underrated movie
nomnaut ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:49:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm more of a Land Before Time child. Saw it in the theater. Not ashamed to admit I cried. Multiple times.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:51:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I love how you can't pinpoint the exact locations, but any American would automatically recognize the world as modeled after America. The sunset seen through the wheat grass especially has that American Midwest feel to it.
Beautiful renderings, it's a shame the same effort wasn't put into the story.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:05:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can. The 2nd image clearly is Beartooth Butte Formation, WY. The entire movie is based on actual USGS data of the northwest. Pixar reconstructed 64,600 square miles of North America.
http://www.slashfilm.com/making-of-the-good-dinosaur/
Ptizzl ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:51:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I stayed through the end credits just for the scenes like this.
My kids liked the movie. I didn't like it so much, which is sad because I have a lithograph of every Pixar movie in my office. I did, however, love the visuals. I will watch it again just for the sheer perfection of the landscapes.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:37:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They could have kept the landscapes during the credits scroll.
cloudmerchant ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:52:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was so excited for this movie. I was a total dinosaur nut as a child (I'm 36 now), and I love Pixar so much.
But this movie was just terrible. The script felt like something they whipped together over a lunch meeting, and then someone got a 5 year old drunk so they could design the characters.
steakgames ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:57:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
still it was huge let down
JamesKM716 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:01:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The visuals for this movie were so good that I felt like it would have improved the entire movie if there was no dialogue. Tell the entire film through the actions of the characters. I think they could pull it off.
againamind ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:43:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That probably would have been way better to be honest. I found the dialogue felt odd through the whole film.
fordycreak ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:39:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In pic 21, we see a familiar face of the moon, is it safe to assume the moon was tidally locked hundreds of millions of years ago?
AstronomicalArtist18 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:03:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I've heard the storyline isn't that great but this might make me reconsider not watching the movie!
1337Gandalf ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:51:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm actually really hype now I thought the landscapes would be basic af like the dinosaurs.
Spaghetti_Bender8873 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:03:31 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watching this in the theater was the best animation demo I've ever seen.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:12:01 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:23:03 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a crop. The dinosaurs are farmers.
telukintan ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:32:05 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
i want to live here. hnnngggg
Pritzker ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 16:58:50 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I watched this movie this weekend. The landscape is absolutely fantastic. The story definitely has it's Disney influence (as opposed to pure Pixar), but the setting in the film was absolutely jaw-dropping. "Magical" might be the best way to describe it. Pre-historic magic.
RobaBobaLoba ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:15:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How are all those trees lined up like that? I thought this took place in prehistoric times?
Alect0 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:34:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The dinosaurs have mastered agriculture. (yes I'm being serious)
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:01:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It takes place millions of years after the extinction level event that killed the dinosaurs, except in this movie that event never happened. The land has been cultivated by dinosaurs.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:24:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a crop. The dinosaurs are farmers.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 03:02:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Is literally every shot in this movie a landscape? I mean damn that's a lot of scenery. From what I've seen of the characters, they don't really fit with that pseudo-real style.
mrbooze ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:43:43 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The character design intentionally clashes with the landscape.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:01:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Interesting. What other animated films have done this? Not to sound suspect, but have they said that? Seems to me they could have been going for more of an updated Dinosaurs look and shifted halfway to the happy meal toy look they ended up with. Keep in mind this is Disney we're talking about.
mrbooze ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:47:52 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/10/15/the-good-dinosaur-could-be-a-big-miss-or-a-big-hit
Q: You have a central character who doesnโt seem to fit the rest of the environment, both physically because itโs unfamiliar to him, but visually as well. Heโs cartoonish in a way that you wouldnโt expect from a movie thatโs surrounded by photorealism. I was wondering, during what part of the process was that decision made?
A: It was made pretty early on. The story went through sort of an evolution, and by the time Pete [Sohn] came on, he had been involved with a lot of the designs of the characters, and we basically decided that the characters were going to be younger, and pretty much based on that research trip* we went out there and decided that nature would be the antagonist. And so we talked about trying to stylize nature more, and it just didnโt feel as threatening as you would want. We have a couple of big natural phenomena that occur that are sort of devastating, and if you have a stylized look I just donโt believe you would think it was as threatening. And the other big stylistic choice with the design of the character was we wanted him to feel like he didnโt fit in, and that he didnโt belong out there, so that was really what drove those two choices.
Serenade314 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:10:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Man, in a few years VR experiences will look just like that. The end of mankind :-)
Senno_Ecto_Gammat ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:51:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
No. The beginning.
Molten__ ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:47:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
the technology behind this movie is mindblowing. it makes me excited for finding dory.
MakeItHilts ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:49:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thank you for posting this magnificent slideshow. It was like going to the American Museum of Natural History and a gallery-show of N.C. Wyeth or Maxfield Parrish.
ViciusTF141 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:50:48 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wow!
Bignicky9 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:54:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL OF THE DINOSAURS? SNIFFLE
Torley_ ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:55:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The end credits shows just gorgeous postmodern screensaver scenery and no dinosaurs too.
ntheg111 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:59:41 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
/r/imaginarylandscapes
Paul8491 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:41:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Can we now get a synthetic benchmarking tool with this?
Paul8491 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:41:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Can we now get a synthetic benchmarking tool with this?
Amduscio ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:49:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Do the Revenant next. Those landscapes are beautiful
motherly1000 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:50:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some of it is photorealistic. Cant wait for 4k bluray.
Flgardenguy ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:58:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It wasn't until the ninth picture that I realized I was looking a computer graphics. Props to Pixar.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:02:29 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I grew up there, in Wyoming. It's far too cold in the winter, now I live in a desert.
imnotabus ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:04:11 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
have seen better in almost every pixar film.
immrtlsaij ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:05:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
when i reached the sixth image i became confused as to why there are crops in a dinosaur movie.
VeryVeryBadJonny ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:08:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Cannot wait until games can do this.
hoochiscrazy_ ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:10:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Earth is a character in itself in that movie
superninjafury ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:12:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
While watching this movie I was thinking wow Pixar is really showing how good they've gotten, remove the dinosaur from any shot and it was stunning.
justinbieberfan42 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:13:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I loved the scenery. But the dinos were unlikable, and looked so out of place against the photo realistic backgrounds...
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:49:50 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
.
you_get_CMV_delta ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 08:52:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Hmm, that is a good point. I hadn't thought about the matter that way before.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:56:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Haha disregard. I was saving the thread for later.
jmelchio ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:53:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So much time and effort went into animating these, and what do you do? You just SCROLL on through eh?!
ShoobieStomper ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:54:42 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Haha :-) It's funny that the movie is about dinosaurs because Earth was so desolate when they were alive and now we have computers that can recreate their existence.
wigglytuff2 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:11:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Looks like real photos and photography. Such gifted animators.
storymana88 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:15:22 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a strange movie for me. The animation was probably the best I've seen yet, but the movie itself was oddly bland. It really didn't leave the impact that Pixar normally does. It's by no means bad, but it's not really amazing either.
FilmsByDan ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:20:34 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The realism of the scenery was incredible. A touching movie too.
broadcasthenet ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:49:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Overall I thought the movie was pretty terrible, the only enjoyment I got out of it was the constant realization on how far CG has come in the last 20 years. Except for the characters they all looked like stuffed animals.
conehead88 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:51:36 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Does anyone else think the cloud in the middle right looks like the same one from toy story?
https://i.imgur.com/PVPHccz.jpg
http://i794.photobucket.com/albums/yy222/toystoryftw/TS3%20Chapter%201%20HD%20Screencaps/00139.jpg
ColourfulBird ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:56:07 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Was anyone else kind of shocked to see a child character being expected to kill an animal by his father?
It was totally justified situation (they literally would have starved because of Spot eating their food), but it felt surprisingly real to me.
batt3ryac1d1 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:06:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Much better without the weirdly animated out of place dinosaurs.
AdamMcwadam ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:14:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watched it a second time just to make sure I actually did think it was a great film. And yep, its very good. Theres a lot of people who won't see it and call it terrible because of the cartoony Dinosaurs and then comparing the models to Disney's 2000 film Dinosaurs which in comparison look very dated. Also (thats not the kind of look they were going for)
If thats the only reason why you won't watch this film then I think you may over analyse it if you every do watch it. Its not a film about how the character models look. Its a film about fear.
Seriously its worth seeing, its not complex like Inside Out (not comply like hard to follow) But its still a great film. I actually preferred it to Inside Out and it may have been my favourite film of 2015. Its just a lovely film.
Overmostheads ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:26:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dem feels when it draws a circle around them
Stezieman ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:30:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You and your click bait can eat a dick!
calittle ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:33:16 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I just saw this movie last night. I agree that the landscape visuals were nothing short of amazing - I had to look very hard for clues that the Dino's weren't composited onto stock footage. (Ok not that hard but it was really impressive). I'll echo the sentiment that it's not Pixar's best story line - maybe because we've seen it before and it feels rehashed and atypically morose for Pixar all the way through. You could perhaps try a plot line comparison against Up! and I'll bet they're pretty similar.
muttenxd ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:43:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
FiveThirtyEight's podcast What's The Point did an episode on how they used real geographical data to model the landscapes in The Good Dinosaur. I thought it was really interesting.
You can hear it here if you are interested: http://pca.st/WYWP
It's 28 minutes.
mike_birbiglia ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:43:59 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
On pic 15, they even left in some chromatic aberration on the bokeh, a color-distortion effect caused by a physical lens not being able to focus all colors on one convergence point.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:46:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I thought they were photographs.
My kids are gonna have some good looking video games (no kids yet).
katmonday ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:13:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So if I wanted to have one of these as a print to hang on my wall, what would I need to do?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:44:10 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The resolution of these images are 1920x808 px. To print a poster you have to use a resolution of 150dpi, so your poster could be 32.51x13.68 cm. It's pretty small.
Maybe Disney at some point will have a 4k resolution of this, but could be easier to find pictures of these real locations.
katmonday ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:26:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thanks so much for this information!
Redditmantothesite ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:59:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well why the fuck do you call it the "Good Dinosaur Landscapes" if there aren't any ducking dinosaurs?! That seems intentionally misleading.
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:20:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, but it's from a movie named "The Good Dinosaurs" and I'm showing only the landscapes with no dinosaurs because it's beautiful and the dinosaurs are cartoonish.
Redditmantothesite ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:35:31 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Gotcha.
oldwestcumslinger ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:07:40 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why was there a corn field?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:18:09 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Because they are farmers... yeah, the dinosaurs.
oldwestcumslinger ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 15:50:12 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh.... K... Sure.
AcidIsaid ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:33:46 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is what I liked.
theaxeman7 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 16:03:33 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What is the best way to have one of these printed for large wall art?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:57:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wait for Disney release a 4K Bluray.
dimpe ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:40:39 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This movie reminded me alot of Yellowstone. F.ex Mammoth hot springs and then Grand Teton being the Clawtooth Mountain. But ye, the visuals is crazy good!
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:58:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They actually used geological data from Wyoming, so there's a lot of Yellowstone there.
dimpe ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:16:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wow, thats awsome information, thanks mate.
Pritzker ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:06:18 on February 15, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Imagine virtual reality environments like this 20, 25 years from now. That would be incredible, but kind of scary at the same time.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:49:56 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
dem establishing shots tho
Cera_is_Tops ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:31:54 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Where can I buy it on DVD or Blue-Ray?
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:57:15 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It will be released on Monday
js1138-2 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:41:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's a great movie for young kids. Too bad adults aren't smart enough to get the point.
My three year old nephew got the point, and cried at just the appropriate moment.
Not every movie has to have adult content or fart jokes. This one is just sweet.
SupperTime ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 05:22:21 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So don't watch or watch?
roadrunner440x6 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 06:55:00 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I loved it. The story is VERY sad, so if you're expecting a light-hearted laugh-fest, don't. I think that's why people are bashing the story so much. I typically like my cartoons to NOT make me feels. This one does.
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 10:03:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm guessing they're bashing it because it's sad for no reason. It's manipulatively sad. The same people bashing it would likely highly recommend both Up and Finding Nemo, both of which are really sad movies that make you feel.
This is sad in a very forced, immature way compared to Up and Finding Nemo. The plot is also extremely scattered.
roadrunner440x6 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:23:04 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I can agree with that.
Throwawaymyheart01 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:04:08 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Watch it but it's not up to their usual quality. It was a fun watch but lacked the subtlety and depth of other Pixar movies.
Nomaddening ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:26:45 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some of these images look absolutely photo realistic, but most of them look just slightly unnatural, and I can't figure out why. They're almost perfect, but there's just something that still says its CG. Is it the lighting? Are the colors too saturated? Are some of the models too perfect? As an artist, I'd really like to know!
alex_wifiguy ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:23:49 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some of them look way too saturated, the water looks fake in some of them, and a few trees look like shit. The lighting is actually really good.
babyeatingdingoes ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:58:01 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I have a background on my computer that's nearly identical to image 54 except mine looks less realistic. I took mine about a decade ago at a friend's farm with my first digital camera.
AMLRoss ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:06:47 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Some of it is photorealistic. Cant wait for 4k bluray.
reekys94 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:25:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Honestly the movie would be better if it were just an hour and a half a peaceful CGI backdrops and maybe some relaxing music.
Wehbula ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 09:37:57 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Movie was so boring. Nothing happened. Pixar should shut down.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:45:03 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I saw this movie with my disabled clients and planned on falling asleep, but was actually just in awe of the amazing landscapes that looked exactly like the wilderness I have explored in utah my whole life.
[deleted] ยท -7 points ยท Posted at 00:17:17 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Underrated movie
_____Matt_____ ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 01:14:55 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can like something while acknowledging that it shouldn't be highly rated. The film is really boring. The jokes fall flat, the ending is terrible. The message is jumbled.
I was really hit by the trailer because the moment he hugs Arlo is so sweet. But that's as far as the film brings the audience emotionally. That gave us just a taste of the amazing possibilities of expanding on that relationship. but the film fails to do that.
It is visually stunning, but the worst Pixar film since Cars 2.
cwagz ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 02:26:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
He gets to make his mark on the silo simply because he didn't die. Beautiful movie visually but the story was not great.
_____Matt_____ ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 02:30:32 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's that bit in Despicable Me where Gru reads a bedtime story to the girls. The Good Dinosaur was on a level with that bedtime story.
yellowstone10 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 04:05:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
More than that - if the movie's logic is consistent, he may have condemned his family to die. They discuss, more than once, the importance of him getting home to bring in enough food before the first snowfall. He returns after the first snowfall, so presumably they didn't bring in enough food to survive the winter...
๐๏ธ luke_in_the_sky ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:15:06 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Also, shitty parents with their mark system.
kwoddle ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 01:15:20 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Appropriately rated movie.
Doctorboffin ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 02:52:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Overrated to me. It has like 77% on Rotten Tomatoes, but it was really mediocre. Maybe that's just me though.
VMoney9 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:06:14 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Admittedly, we all keep our standards pretty high for Pixar.
Doctorboffin ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:19:51 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
True, but to me it was worse then most Dreamworks films, heck I would say it would be closer to something released by Blue Sky or Sony.
BirdLawSpecialist ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 02:13:13 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This. Some of their best visuals ever but a pretty uninspiring story, especially when compared to the rest of their library.
Random-Miser ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 04:52:27 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Almost as if it they were made for a completely different movie.....which they actually were.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 06:08:18 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Huh?
rreeeeeee ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 07:33:53 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not bad, almost as good as skyrim.
Ari-the-Lion ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 08:50:02 on February 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Pixar is killing animation. Technically, this is extremely impressive... but there's no art to it.