I feel like every expansion there is a card that reddit tears apart and berates as completely unplayable that goes on to later be an integral part of the meta.
I mean I'm not gonna complain about hadronox, that'd be okay to bring back some zombeasts with
Cryzard · 1 points · Posted at 19:07:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Priest says hi
[deleted] · 21 points · Posted at 04:21:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don‘t think so either. Even if you meet the condition, it doesn‘t come into play early enough. Should be 5 or 4 mana to be evaluated like that.
Though I can definitely see new hunter archetypes becoming a thing in the near future should blizz decide to print one or two overpowered hunter cards.
Veratyr · 5 points · Posted at 09:43:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah this is going to be one of the rare times where everyone is right. This card sucks.
It's remotely possible that in the next expansion or two, Hunter will get a bunch of bonkers "no minions" synergy cards, and this will get played. Cue Ben Brode laughing at this thread.
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
ADwards · 4 points · Posted at 12:53:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It seems like I'm the only one that thinks this is not only playable, but good. There's a lot of cheap beast decks and this slots in better than highmane. I've played a lot of games where playing this on turn 6 and getting two 4/2 charges ends it.
I feel like every expansion there is a card that reddit tears apart and berates as completely unplayable that goes on to later be an integral part of the meta.
This is not that card.
That makes no sense. This card is bad for the Epic pool because you can open most if not all Commons with 20-30 packs and/or craft the rest. But open this and you cry while someone else opens an obviously good one.
SoepWal · 10 points · Posted at 15:56:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Since opening an epic does not reduce your chance of opening another epic, I'd still always take the epic over another common.
Think of it this way: good or bad, you will have all of the commons very quickly, and thus all commons very quickly become Auto dust. You want to avoid dusting Epics because they are relatively rare. Dusting 4 bad epics to craft one good epic is so much worse than someone else that simply opened 4 good epics. Bad epics cards are bad for the game.
How does summoning 2 animal companions for 6 mana help you in the super late game compared to all other late game decks, nevermind how hard it would be to recruit all your minions out and how bad this would be sitting in your hand until then, especially as hunter which is the worst equiped class to go late game?????
Hunter Death knight shouldn't need any more minions cuz heropower. A few tempo minions and recruiters (or draw specific cards like Curator and Patches) to guarantee they're all out, Hunter can really make use of all its gimmicky spells, including the 2 mana spell that refills your hand with each consecutive spell (nvm. I don't think that's standard still). Also hunter is getting a new hard removal card, also specific to lategame. The card itself still relies on a tempo deck that has an established board, but anyway, i can see play this card as apart of a new hunter deathknight archtype but yes it won't fit into other Hunter decks.
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 10:08:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If this makes it into any tier 2 or above viable metadeck I'll give you a plum floating in perfume served in a man's hat.
heseme · 1 points · Posted at 13:37:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I may be thinking wrong but it says no minions...so that means as long as you run an all beast deck this card isn't as terrible as it sounds? I think of it like having 6 copies of animal companions in your deck.
The card text is not "if you run no minions..." but rather "if your deck [currently] has no minions." Once you have drawn (not necessarily played) all the minions in your deck, you get the full benefit of this card. If your point is that the full benefit of the card is probably not worth the downside, I concur.
I mean maybe there's a way to use it...
Maybe upon playing this, your opponents will laugh for 2 minutes straight so they skip their turn and the card is like a '0 mana summon 2 animal companions' because you get 2 turns in a row?
Doesn't make sense, it should 5 mana at the most so it's a discount on two Animal Companions if you fulfill the requirement.. at 6 mana its just saving you a card with a punishing requirement of not having minions.
Maybe they want Yogg/Spell Hunter or Trap Hunter without minions to be a thing..?
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 08:24:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They started call the wild at 8 mana and it was oppresive. I'd like them to try this at a discount 5 mana first, but meh.
_shiv · 2 points · Posted at 02:40:56 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
True but this has an insane condition on it which cotw doesn't. Discount should be for the condition.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:02 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'd say that as it won't be played outside that specific deck type, that the cost is fine.
It wasn't oppressive at all compared to what people are doing now with things like UI, Anduin, Bonemare, etc.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:21 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Agree on UI, but not bonemare. At least there is something you can do about BM
wwphd · 1 points · Posted at 05:32:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There is a deck floating around that is basically Secret hunter + rexxar + yshar / barnes.. it could kinda work in that but at that point you wanna just be rexxar at 6 and using the next 6 mana for a zombeast.. i dunno
Unless they came up with his card at the last minute, it wouldn't make any sense because that deck hardly sees any play and has only been floating around recently. And it's a really bad deck.
Cutting Cloaked Huntress & Professor Putricide alone makes this card garbage in secret hunter, let alone not having minions other than what your DK makes
qordytpq · 150 points · Posted at 05:44:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They just want Hunter players to feel a sense of pride and accomplishment when they win
Something something... card games need bad cards... something something.
plknz · 161 points · Posted at 05:31:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a card designed to teach players what makes a good card game worth spending money on and when to save your money and take your business elsewhere.
[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 07:49:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally the reason bad cards exist. "Teaching" is such a bullshit argument. If that were the actual reason then you would have bad cards in tutorial modes or whatnot.
But no, it's not "shitty design" or "we need filler cards so that players spend more time/dust/money", it's "a teaching moment."
Zellyff · 10 points · Posted at 05:30:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ya but bad cards should make you think more then...
I know Team 5 stubbornly refuses to buff/change cards... but this is one they just have to make an exception. I literally feel insulted by this card and closed out of Hearthstone for the night
I was thinking the same thing. The card is so insanely bad it makes me question the competence of the designers. Maybe we're all missing something they found in testing, but I'm still holding out for the fact that this was misinterpreted somehow.
Fyrjefe · 9 points · Posted at 14:20:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe it did well versus their in-house highlander taunt druid specialist.
For the Barnes-Yshaarj decks that win like 25% of the time i guess.
blakato · 14 points · Posted at 04:21:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I️ dunno I️ play Barnes yshaarj hunter and I️ have a solid 65% winrate
At rank 20
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 06:28:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the idea behind this is that you recruit all the other minions in your deck and this is something to use after. Except, you know, even then it's a dead card in your hand for most of the game and even when played it's a 6 mana use two 3 mana cards.
blakato · 5 points · Posted at 06:45:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Secret hunter decks that are light on minions are actually a lot more effective than people give credit for. I️ think this is flat out for a yogg’n’load-esque spell deck rather than a recruit deck.
Both still use some minions though. Or are you gonna wait till turn 15 to draw all your minions to play this??
blakato · 2 points · Posted at 08:17:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, you’re going to play builds that don’t run any minions at all and instead use the spells that generate minions that hunter has and deathstalker rexxar to make do.
The steep cost makes me think some guy in testing went on a streak with the no-minions deck and this was somehow the result. Maybe Hunter will get some spell-jousting stuff like Mage is.
You Barnes into guaranteed 1/1 YGod into guaranteed 10/10 YGod. It's a gimmick deck that relies on cheating out a 10/10 on turn 4 and loses otherwise (and if they can clear it). It's like shitty Big Priest with fewer win conditions but highrolls harder.
blakato · 2 points · Posted at 09:38:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It actually has another win condition of eagle horn bow and hit people in the face while Generating minions from hunter spells and rexxar, which while not necessarily a good win condition can still win games even when the opponent kills your Y’shaarj.
This is obviously the purify of this expansion. I can't wait until everyone is laughing later when Hunter is tier 1 after they print more cards like secrets/spells to sustain a hunter while they run Animal Companions, Call of the Wild (Shit that's rotating soon), Deathstalker Rexxar to steamroll their opponents in the late game.
What I'm saying is, don't count this card out, Hunter is getting a cool archetype I think
narfidy · 820 points · Posted at 03:11:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
+3 mana for a conditional upside
Holy fuck this is one of the worst cards I've ever seen
that s my point : if you have a conditional "bonus" that worth exactly what you paid for, then it is no upside. Its not like i disagree with him or anything, we all know how shitty this card is.
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:13:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I thought some shut like Priestess of Elune was objectively the most unplayable Hearthstone card, but now, looking at this, the bar is set too low.
When I first heard about this I didn't see the mana and figured it was probably 4. At 4 it'd be bad, but I guess maybe in some weird lock and load deck?
Can't wait for open this epic 3 times in my 40 packs and get no others.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:56:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Possibly unpopular opinion: Good, this card should be epic, because it's incredibly, incredibly niche.
I just wish that ALL epics were this niche, so I could ignore most of them and just craft the few I'm interested in.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 04:32:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Exactly. Print good cards at common and rare. Put more situational xarss at epic and legendary. Why would you want to have must craft legendaries?
AaroSa · 1 points · Posted at 09:39:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, people get angry when epics are good, but apparently angry also when theyre bad. I’m happy this is an epic instead of some actually good, non-meme cafd.
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Having epics be a combination of meme cards and must-haves is the worst. I think people would mostly be alright if they were all one or the other, probably leaning towards all being meme cards as it makes the game cheaper. But right now, the fact that the same rarity can give absolutely game-breakingly overpowered cards like Psychic Scream OR this garbage is way too much variance for such an insanely rare and expensive card type.
MixesQJ · 1 points · Posted at 10:21:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Most wacky cards are epic, why would this be an exception?
Jakkol · 1 points · Posted at 12:43:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Epic cards being bad is good tho. Since they are the worst ones to craft, you should be happy whenever an epic is bad, since you dont have to craft it and can just dust it whenever you get it.
Over time this will find a home IMO. One of my Wild decks is focused on token makers like this as a means to maximize King's Elekk value. Brewing such a deck shows you that this will be possible, but it's not quite there yet. It needs a 2-drop token maker that isn't a secret, a 1-drop discover-a-minion like Rogue and Warrior have, and a payoff high-drop and it'll already be plausible, and after another year of cards it'd be a legit deck.
APRengar · 1688 points · Posted at 03:10:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Haha, great prank.
There's no way Blizz would create something like this.
It'd be weird as hell for Blizz to print a card that punishes having minions for a minion heavy class.
Or having no minions in the deck for a class that has notoriously bad card draw and no sustain to get to the point where they have no minions left in the deck.
That'd just be dumb.
I mean, it's definitely a very realistic looking fake but a fake nonetheless. Definitely. 100%. Without a doubt. Yes.
I realize this is part of a joke, but don't people get a lot more pissed when they print auto-include epic cards since they cost a lot to craft?It's a joke, but it logically doesn't make any sense at all.
Which is why the polarization of epic cards is so infuriating. You hope for the really good ones, which you need two of, but end up getting this from the packs instead.
the only explanation I could see is there's a big card they haven't revealed yet that rewards you for each companion summoned in the game (similar to the Mage legendary)
Kazzack · 1 points · Posted at 04:40:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and of course it's an epic
dnl101 · 1 points · Posted at 10:22:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I seriously thought this was a "hunter is so bad circlejerk fake card".
Hunter is a very beast heavy deck, not minions heavy. It just means you won't be able to run things like bonemare or scalebane. Just strictly beasts only.
It feels like it should read 'summon 2 animal companions, 3 if you have no minions'
Merfen · 2 points · Posted at 18:17:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That is what I was thinking, THAT would make it worthwhile to think up a deck, even if it was trash. This card's upside makes it the same value as 2 animal companions. I swear we must all be reading this wrong or we are missing something. A 6 mana 2 animal companions with no conditions wouldn't even be broken, just very good. 6 mana 2 Leokks isn't exactly going to suddenly turn hunter into a tier 1 deck.
Or even if it was still summon 1 animal companion when you had minions in your deck, but summon 3 if you don't.
It would be super broken to get a 6 mana call of the wild, maybe, but the downside of not playing minions - in a class that revolves entirely around minions - would make it a bit better.
Or hell, even if you made it discover instead of summon. Still wouldn't be great, maybe, but it would at least mean that it isn't a 6 mana animal companion, and rhe ability to discover 2 might be enough to make it at least not terrible
I don't know if this card would have been run if it was unconditional....
Besuh · 120 points · Posted at 06:37:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It'd probably be pretty good. Animal companion is really good. A good closer for aggro decks and good value for a midrange. Double leokk isn't even that bad.
You have to consider that as the mana cost goes up, the value of the effect goes down. Also consider the other options for that turn. You can argent commander, you can sunwalker, you can savannah highmane. Would two animal companions be better than those things? Maybe, but there's an RNG element there. On top of that, there are other options that are cheaper and more reliable if you're after pure damage, or you can go one mana higher for bonemare.
An unconditional version of, 'To my side!' isn't a bad card. It just might be too mediocre to see play.
Besuh · 3 points · Posted at 08:30:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can see a world where it wouldn't see play. But lets not pretend there are that many bad options that RNG plays a huge factor.
Argent Commander - can make better value trades does a guaranteed 4 damage. Getting at least 1 huffer 55% chance with the upside of doing 5 damage 33% and 8 33% of those times.
Sunwalker. I don't see why this would be a good card in hunter.
Savannah - obviously a good value card. Honestly may be one of the best 6 drops in the game. lacks the board impact that to my side has tho.
I honestly think the biggest thing holding this (unconditional) card back is hunter itself. I imagine it in a tempo deck builds a board and finishes with to myside. Similar to how Call of the wild did. Obviously not as consistent but earlier.
If Call of the Wild is run, then this card would be run
Merfen · 2 points · Posted at 18:29:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Guaranteeing all 3 is really more valuable though. You get a guaranteed taunt, charge and damage boost. Depending on if you can get duplicates you may just end up with 2 Leokks when you really needed either a charge or taunt to save yourself from a death the next turn. At 6 mana if you don't get what you needed that could be game over. It wouldn't be bad, but nowhere near as good as CoTW.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:37:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's often 4+ charge damage to the face, as well as putting two decent creatures on the board. That's pretty good.
It might have been a good include for Kathrena decks. Not busted, but it would be another body in the midgame.
But how it is now I wonder why it is not 5 mana. Absolutely no minions is a really crippling requirement. I doubt it would even be used in lock 'n load deck, as you want to play multiple spells on the same turn in that deck. It wouldn't even work in a secret deck, as that requires minions to synergize with secrets.
Maybe we will see some 'cast a spell from your deck' things in Hunter. Hunter has multiple cards that work with it, such as animal companion and it's bigger version and all the secrets. It is really not a Hunter theme though.
I think the just designed this as a counter to the dreaded millhouse decks.
Oh wow I completely misread the card twice.
I thought it was Summon 1 companion, summon 2 more if your deck has no minions for a grand total of 3
Wow this is absolute trash.
Fyrjefe · 1 points · Posted at 14:27:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It used to be 8. Then this sub threw a bitch fest over Hunter during WoG. We have seen the decline for a while. Of course, they will never be moderate on their class balance. "Everyone gets their turn".
Really cool video, and highlights what's wrong with Hearthstone's design here.
One With Nothing is the sort of card that some players would love in the interest of making it useful, just as the video said. It's unique, it stands alone. It may literally never be useful, it may have its day, but they at least went with a unique effect.
To My Side is just doubling a vanilla card, which is lazy design considering they tripled the same vanilla card last year. Next year we'll see "I Hunt Alone! - 0 mana: Summon no Animal Companions." A year after that they may have to stop waiting till the last second to come up with hunter cards because they've run out of ways to lazily tack on numbers to Animal Companion.
Compare this to Purify which was just a situational card released at a time when Priests desperately needed viable cards to stay afloat. Purify's crime was being gimmicky when they needed value, To My Side is just guilty of "fuck it, tweak a vanilla card" with some "make it worse than last year's version" thrown in to look creative.
Aishi_ · 3 points · Posted at 22:01:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know the effect is pretty lame and the usability is questionable at its best, but do you really think this card doesn't make you try some weird stuff?
The top comment at the time I a reading this says something like: "this has a no minion clause in the most minion centered class, this is stupid". But that is exactly what they were pushing here, a non-minion hunter, that's as gimmicky as trying to make "discard your hand" work well.
Can't you see that if this card was actually good enough it could coin a completely new way to play hunter? The only shame here is the HS team playing too safe on it and probably leaving it in the dust because the don't buff stuff.
raphop · 2 points · Posted at 02:16:20 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
But its vastly different than one with nothing, yes both cards require you build the deck around it, however one with nothing has it's potential strength in the weird synergies it's capable of triggering, itself has no upside it's entirely dependent on other cards and their strengths which in turn could allow for some very interesting combos.
To my side though has a gigantic downside for a really meh upside, it doesn't really combo with anything, it's power is entirely on the card text and it's not a good one, it's just there, it doesn't open any doors it's just a very lame effect
Isn't it the same as building a Reno/Kazakus deck though?
It is a very direct restriction on deck building but I honestly don't think it is bad. Forced deck build restriction is something unique to Hearthstone but I honestly do like it.
But I agree with you that this isn't exactly the same tipe of weirdness, but because these two cards shouldn't be compared in the first place. An example of HS card that aligns itself with what you said about One With Nothing is Treachery(Warlock Donate Minion), so I am still not buying this "MTG design >>>>" issue on this card, and I fucking love MTG, diehard Blue player.
And people keep complaining that the card is extremely weak even if it had no downside but I can still remember people bitching about Call of the Wild before its nerf ("how was this not 9 mana if you are getting 3 times the card??? WTF"). I'm not sold on this card and I think Hunter is still looking like trash, but people shiting on everything about when it is a clear message Blizzard is trying to make Spells-only decks on a game that is fucking bloated with minions everywhere is amazing news to me.
Isn't it the same as building a Reno/Kazakus deck though?
No, Reno et al require you to build your deck in a very different way for an extremely powerful - sometimes game-deciding - unique effect. This card is far less powerful and not at all unique.
It may literally never be useful, it may have its day, but they at least went with a unique effect.
Then they should have made it a fucking common, not a rare. Just like this card, if it should have even been released, should not be taking up an epic slot in our card packs.
Yeah, spell hunter, while far from a good deck, is still dependant on the very few minions it does run. Either yogg or y'shaarj can't be cut. Especially not for another huffer.
This card should have been "3 mana, Summon two animal companions, costs (1) more for every minion in your deck"
One With Nothing is obviously worse than this. The card obviously isn't good, but a six mana animal companion, while quite poor, isn't strictly useless. One With Nothing has less power and weaker synergies than To My Side. Everyone is getting caught up in hyperbole because Hunter got a bad card.
wugs · 14 points · Posted at 07:22:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"worse" is such a relative term. Like, if I am topdecking late game, yes I clearly want To My Side instead of One With Nothing. But in terms of almost every other part of the card, One With Nothing is superior. They are both "build around" cards, so judging them in a vacuum is pointless. If you want to look at other aspects of cards, One With Nothing is certainly by FAR more interesting. It's also amazingly flavorful. It's a point of discussion.
To My Side is going to just become a meme card and that's about it. It does nothing unique or interesting for the Hunter class other than show that Blizz doesn't know how to give Hunter any other class identity outside of beast minions and like this weird spellslinger idea of Lock and Load.
Instead of raw power level, look at this. Let's say To My Side goes off for you. You pay 6 and get two animal companions. How good do you feel? Now how about you play One With Nothing and it either stops your opponent's win con or enables yours. That's going to feel sweet.
Edit: See this comment for a great video on One With Nothing and how it's an amazing-but-bad card, and how Angel's Mercy is a much, much, much worse card.
Edit 2: Angel’s Mercy, not Angel’s Grace. Damn you white and your very similar names for very very different effects.
One With Nothing has been an interesting puzzle for Magic players historically, but the solution to it has always been that the card is just bad. Its flavorful, interesting, and terrible. The card only saw play as suspicious sideboard tech vs Owling Mine and the mystique surrounding it is a result of how weird the card is.
From a design standpoint One With Nothing is certainly more fun to consider and build around, but people are talking about as if it is in anyway stronger than To My Side, which is simply not.
The fact that it saw play makes it better than this, even if it saw very little play. Sure, this is better in limited formats where you can't really build around as much. it's a 6 Mana animal companion, which while terrible, isn't totally useless. But in constructed formats there's really no reason to ever run this. In that case, One With Nothing is better, since there are at least a few cases to run it.
wugs · 1 points · Posted at 19:35:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The solution is that it is bad for now. It could be good in the right meta. It is really really difficult for me to imagine To My Side being a good card. Even if a Hunter did run a spells only deck this isn’t an auto-include which says a lot about its viability.
Zelos · 0 points · Posted at 11:57:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Edit: See this comment for a great video on One With Nothing and how it's an amazing-but-bad card, and how Angel's Grace is a much, much, much worse card.
Are you seriously arguing that a completely unplayable card is better than a staple in a powerful combo deck?
That's nonsensical. One with nothing isn't powerful; it's awful. It's half of a combo except the other half doesn't exist.
wugs · 2 points · Posted at 19:31:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i definitely typo’d actually. I meant Angel’s Mercy, 4 mana gain 7 life. My bad. I was referring to the card in the One With Nothing video I linked.
TCV2 · 4 points · Posted at 07:22:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The hell are you talking about, there are plenty of "graveyard matters" decks. One With Nothing may only have that one effect, but that is at least usable (with countless of better replacements).
To My Side is just a fucking joke. That card is being printed in what is arguable the biggest "minions matter" class. Nearly every Hunter deck is largely based on minions (sole exception being Yogg n' Load, but even then you're running Yogg). On top of that, this is even worse due to the fact that Hunter has been in the gutter since Gadgetzan at the very least. Handbuff fell flat, Quest Hunter never fully panned out, and DK Hunter just wasn't strong enough.
I don't expect Hunter to ever return to Undertaker-levels of strength. That's just stupid. But at the very least I want for cards like To My Sides to not be printed.
Not a single reanimator deck has ever played One With Nothing. The card is awful and has never seen actual play. To My Side is another weak hunter card that has become a meme. People are comparing the two as if a weak build around effect is worse than one of the most actively bad cards in Magic history.
One with nothing at least can synergize with dredge decks.
Zellyff · 19 points · Posted at 05:32:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One with nothing is actually really good in specific decks the effect can actually win you the game.
It's worse then the generally considered worst card sorrows path which is so bad it gets handed out as a joke to streamers and after community events on mtgo
It wouldn’t really take away a mana crystal, it’s just that in MTG, the mana crystal equivalents (known as Lands) aren’t automatic, but cards you draw from your deck. And they can have additional text on them, including the option to use them as things other than mana crystals. Since Sorrow’s Path is one of these “Mana Crystal” cards, you can use its ability instead of using it to generate mana. In hearthstone, that would just translate to a 1 mana card, not a card that destroys a mana crystal.
Of course, if you wanted to get really precise, the damage effect also comes into play even when used as mana in MTG. So, I guess it would be more like “Corrupt (1)”.
And Corrupt would be a keyword meaning “Turn your topmost mana crystal black. If you cast a spell using a black mana crystal, deal 2 damage to all friendly characters.”
When it comes to lands, there’s not really any quality hearthstone translations.
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 05:54:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow. Give up a land drop for an effect you need 2 creatures for and you take 2 damage to boot and it's on the table so your opponent knows about it.
Zellyff · 6 points · Posted at 08:57:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yep it's by far the worst card possibly ever in any major card game
[[Sorrow's Path]] can at least be comboed with [[Vedalken Plotter]] and [[Icy Manipulator]] to nuke your opponent's board every turn.
My vote for worst Magic card? [[Break Open]]. Not only is it uncastable 99% of the time, it also helps the opponent more often than it hurts then even if you do get to cast it!
Magic the gathering card. You pay 1 Black Mana to discard your entire hand.
It's one of Magic's most infamous cards because no one really knows what you could do with it. There is this convoluted combo you can do to kill yourself with it, but thats about it. It was one of those things that Wizard's printed just because they could and it's kind of lived on in infamy.
plknz · 9 points · Posted at 05:33:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
A card like that totally works in MTG though, because there is that much more depth AND breadth.
Zellyff · 2 points · Posted at 05:33:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean it was thematic in its set that wanted 1 or less card in hand the idea was also to trigger madness or fill your yard.
No, the rats in that block played to the theme by reducing the opponents current and maximum handsize thus reducing the effects of their cards. What you think of is Hellbent from the next block, Ravnica, where card effects were amplified if the owner had no cards. Since having no cards in hand doesn’t really win you the game no matter what, the only Hellbent card used was basically Demonfire, an XR spell that dealt X damage to a target and became uncounterable if you were Hellbent. A possible upside that was never really utilized. An other Hellbent card, Infernal Tutor also saw play for its effect with Lion’s Eye Diamond, but neither of those cards were used in conjunction with OwN. The later printed Keldon Megaliths and Gathan Riders saw some play for their possible upsides, but the mechanic itself was never any good.
No it isnt. I see one with nothing as a meme. I mean, mtg is played face to face. And the look on the face of your opponent when you play this card in the middle of the intense, undecided match is priceless "WHAT THE FUCK" "am i missing something?" "wait, he cant be serious.I know for sure he plays to win" "OMG LOL HOW IS THIS A CARD" " he has some plan for this. But what? What should I do?".
When i play to my side card I just say to my opponent: here friend, I have no minions in my deck and playing the worst class in the game. Enjoy your victory. I cant see how does it create an interesting and rememberable situation.
Hell, you cant even use this card for BM because you will never ever win a game without minions. You can play One With Nothing as your last combo piece in some OTK bullshit for extra spice, or play it with a huge board advantage to insult your opponent.
Two of clubs doubles your bombs. It's better than this.
.
.
.
.
.
.binding of Isaac anyone?
[deleted] · 308 points · Posted at 03:44:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Normally I'm a little frustrated with people saying "this is the worst card" since it's just stupid hyperbole.
But this?
What even is this card.
Cainga · 51 points · Posted at 05:38:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe its garbage like many of the freeze shaman cards that eventually find their usefulness in a specific tavern brawl you get to play once every 6 months.
Forkyou · 6 points · Posted at 09:15:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The freeze shaman cards are pretty bad but most at least do something roughly worth the mana they cost but the thing they do is just bad or too niche.
But with this one? If you do it without meeting the criteria its literally the same as an already in that class existing cards but with TWICE the mana cost. And if you meet the criteria, which is arguable more limiting and crippling than "one of" you get a card that is maybe 1 more mana efficient than what it would normally cost, if even
I mean, you can win a rank 20 game with freeze shaman. I actually got a winstreak with it one day, up to two ranks.
And there is no way you can win with a deck without minions, not even on mage. Like, maybe you'll get like 4% winrate with afk/disconnects/dayli quest matches, but no way it wins against any one who plays the game with an intention to win, no matter whats their deck or skill is.
Not when there is already a class card thats a 3 mana 4/2 Charge ... that is not an epic ... and is from the basic set that all players start out with for free.
psymunn · 7 points · Posted at 04:40:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And there's already a 4 mana 3/3 that gives you a free 2/2 weapon
So, the problem is there's 2 different discussions going on. Its definitely possible you'd rather have a 6 mana animal companion then tentacle for arms, but as a stand alone card, this is way more insulting then TFA.
At least tentacle for arms has like a unique interesting idea, however poorly executed, of being a weapon that never goes away. This, at best, is as if you played 2 animal companions in 1 card. If you have the most deck disrupting condition printed so far. If you sabatoge your own deck, you get a mediocre benefit.
I guess the difference is that TFA is a worse card as far as playability, but I definitely think this is a worse card as far as design. It doesn't even fit with the set which is confusing as hell, its a Rexxar quote, and while rangers/druids exist in DnD and have pets, there's nothing so far as I know that this is a specific reference to. It feels like they gave hunter a good card, that ended up being too good, and this was some generic standby card that they swapped to at the 11th hour.
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 04:19:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
TWO giant paint bubbles
Delekii · 14 points · Posted at 04:21:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There is no way that a hard removal is worse than this. Furthermore, as deathrattles become stronger, so does recycle. It still probably wouldn't be put in decks probably, but it could be right now.
psymunn · 5 points · Posted at 04:41:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Recycle is bad but under rated. It's far from the worst card and a reasonable arena pick
Someone brought up Tentacle for Arms, which I do agree. I think I'd rather stick this in a deck as a 6 mana single animal companion, then play TFA, but I do think this is a far worse designed card. At least TFA is almost an interesting concept, this is just insultingly boring, terrible, and deck disrupting.
At its core, a lot of time, its 2 mana draw a card. That's honestly better then this. In addition to the fact that silence priest actually did moderately well.
It's a conditional 2 mana draw a card + make your creature worse most of the time. It was only after another set came out that silence priest actually became decent.
While I don't think it makes your creatures worse most of the time, as battlecry minions are incredibly prevalent (especially since if you're playing it you're probably making minions better), conditional 2 mana cycle is honestly still better then destroying your deck for combining 2 animal companions into one card, or playing a 6 mana animal companion.
I agree they're both weak cards, but I'd take a purify release any day of the week over this uninspired, unplayable, unmemeable, thing we got.
luizjaq · 3 points · Posted at 03:35:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
individually purify is still a bad card. It got somewhat a bit decent simply because Blizzard's policy to print a 'card A that is strong thanks to another card B which is garbage' 4 months later.
I wont be surprise if they release another stupid card that say "gain huge ass value if you play To my side this/last turn" or some spells of the same theme.
No, you guys just don't get it! This card is so overpowered, Blizzard had to make sure to give Priest a single spell to shut down the entire archetype!
Even if it were 5 Mana I'd find it interesting, I'd be like "Hey maybe 5 years into the future in wild this could be an interesting deck" but this? I just don't see the point? Unless Hunter gets like a "Double the effect of your spells if you have no minions in your deck" or "if you have no minions in your deck your beasts have +?/+?" as an aura effect. But alas cards literally never get buffed so it's garbage and I'll open one and consider why I play.
Dragonhatcher would like a word for K&C's worst card. Cobrastrike says hi on behalf of hunters.
Reiker0 · 5 points · Posted at 04:17:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dragonhatcher at least has potential in decks like big priest although it probably isn't good enough.
This card has no potential. Hunters don't even have enough non-minion-dependent spells to make the deck to use this card, even if it was good (it's not).
Exorrt · 248 points · Posted at 03:16:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You fail to see the Genius of Team 5
You see, this is obviously a card for all the people who haven't beaten the Lich King with Hunter yet.
Good Guy Blizzard just wants everyone to have Arthas and you guys are giving them shit
[deleted] · 56 points · Posted at 03:58:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Would Hunter actually look to play 0 minions against Arthas?
Would this be a good turn 6 play against Arthas?
iSoveit · 72 points · Posted at 04:08:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
no, and no lmao
akmvb21 · 4 points · Posted at 04:10:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is animal companion a good play on turn 3? Almost always. Is call of the wild a good turn 9 play? Yeah usually (if you have it). Seems like this card would be good if you always got two, but not better than highmane which makes it an awkward include since hunter wants to play fast decks and you only have so much space for 5+ drops. What’s awkward is the deck restriction part for no reason.
Btw that card has a great chance of being a 1 if in big priest. Someone crunched the numbers and it’s really effective at increasing your Barnes (25% to almost 50% of a big body), essentially acting as another resurrect since you get a big body on 4 and not just a target to resurrect. At least will be experimented with
A Hunter deck without minions in it is basically a Hunter deck without cards in it. The only exception would be Yogg-n-Load Hunter except this card is bad if you haven't drawn your Yogg yet or any other minions you might run in such a deck. The archetype currently pushed for Hunter this expansion also requires you to have minions in your deck so who exactly is Blizzard expecting to run this card?
The thing about Dragonhatcher is that I can at least see why the printed the card, and what combo it might be supposed to create. Heck, if a good aura-effect or deathrattle dragon even gets printed, I can totally see Dragonhatcher seeing play.
But To my side! is so bad that no matter what other cards the print, or unless they print absolutey broken cards that synergize with this, I can’t wver see this seeing play. Idk what it was designed for, what kind of deck it could possibly go in... It’s not even a fun meme card.
Yeah, like, at least when dragon catchers effect goes off you get something good on the board. With this you have build your entire deck around it for it to be anything other than paying twice as much for animal companion and even when you get 2 of them it's still not worth it. This card probly wouldn't be very good even if the effect wasn't conditional, or if it was a mana less. It's probly one of the worst cards in the game.
Keetek · 2 points · Posted at 03:17:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes, Dragonhatcher has potential in a deck with only BIG dragons.
Lu__ma · 1 points · Posted at 04:01:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I... I think it's designed as a high roll in barnes y'shaarj hunter???
That's about all it can do. Honestly I hope Pure Spell Hunter gets some more support, it's bloody funny.
In all seriousness, don't you run Stitched Tracker over King's Elekk anyway? Poorer statline, but you get to choose whether you want Thaurissan or Yogg, and the original card stays in your deck (which is normally a bad thing, except because you're Control Hunter, they're the two best cards in your deck).
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:22:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stitched Tracker came out after Yogg n Load as a deck was butchered.
Probably just my version because i never net decked it, just jammed yogg and 29 spells because let's be real, it's a deck for memes, not climbing ladder.
I can just imagine some poor sod at rank 20 dicking around trying to make their minion-less Hunter deck work.
They curve out perfectly into this... and some smug ass priest shuffles them into their deck.
Honestly? Blizz probably looked at idiots like me who occasionally make no minion hunter decks and said "lets make a card for that... special individual".
They could easily print more cards to make this viable. Some overpowered cards with the "if your deck has no minions" tag would make this great as you need spells to fill out your deck
In theory, sure. Maybe a class like mage could pull it off. But hunter? They don’t have the tools to control an entire game without minions. Most classes don’t. And even the ones that do would be a really bad deck.
[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 03:46:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Start Running]]
1 mana Hunter Spell common
If your deck has no minions, discover and summon a beast worth <6 mana (repeatable this turn).
I think a card like this could make the archetype viable.
They don’t have the tools to control an entire game without minions. Most classes don’t.
To be fair Hunter is the "spells that summon minions" class. The deck would suck, but it's possible to make 30 card decks without minions that can still get minions on the board.
And I can see the idea. Between the DK, animal companion, Call of the Wild and unleash the hounds i can see how getting minions on board is possible. But why would you ever take out all minions to run a card that doesn’t provide a huge impact? Most cards that require a specific deck type give a huge payoff. (Kazakus, Reno, quests, etc.)
But why would you ever take out all minions to run a card that doesn’t provide a huge impact
I think people are going to give me hate for this... but there is a good reason why the card exists. People have already been making meme decks of "I hunt alone" hunter, this card is merely an official acknowledgement of that meme archetype.
This really isn't the expansion that Hunter needed this sort of "joke card", given Hunter's state, but as a card this does fit into some meme decks people use, and in fact even encourages those meme decks with a special little nod. This card reminds me of "Purify", where everybody hates on it because it's a terrible meme archetype... but if No-Minions Hunter ever gets the same sort of boosts that Silence Priest got within the last year, people might not be laughing so much.
I disagree completely, if Call of the Wild can't see play at 9 mana with no RNG, I very much doubt this RNG-card with a worse effect will see play.
The very concept of "if your deck has no minions" decks can never work well without being insanely busted. There is no support for that in the Classic set, which means they would need to devote a full set to cards that promote the effect for it to work. Even then, as long as minions like Weasel Tunneler exist where you can put a minion into the opponent's deck, the decks will never be good with cards like this. A 6 mana animal companion would be cripplingly bad, and if any actually good deck was full of these "no minion deck" cards then you can be sure cards like Weasel Tunneler would be used as a counter because there's no way to stop something like that unless Blizzard plans on adding a spell that specifically makes it impossible for minions to enter your deck, which I doubt people would play.
I also doubt 6 mana for 2 would see much play even WITHOUT it's condition because Hunter already has Highmane, one of the best 6-drops ever printed, in the Classic set. Highmane doesn't have a condition, but it's just plain better than this without RNG.
[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 03:48:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Start Running]]
1 mana Hunter Spell common
If your deck has no minions, discover and summon a beast worth <6 mana (repeatable this turn).
I think a card like this could make the archetype viable.
sir151 · 1 points · Posted at 04:18:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm guessing the legendary weapon might be crazy like "recruit every minion in your deck." This could work with recruit as it thins out your deck and maybe Hunter gets some insane weapons/spells that summon minions. But yeah, you kinda need minions to win in HS.
jmcgit · 1 points · Posted at 05:00:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Its not bad in that Summoners Tavern Brawl, which summons a minion of the same cost as any spell you cast. It’s so bad everywhere else that I can only assume they printed it just for that brawl.
They don't f print anything. They can literally change the card anytime they want. Don't pretend that once they showed this piece of garbage card they can't alter it.
DrQuint · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is viable on the fight against The Lich King.
cndman · 1226 points · Posted at 03:08:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this might literally be the worst card ever printed. It's like insultingly bad.
Edit: On top of the fact that this card is obviously really really horrible for no particular reason, it is also not fun to play at all. It is not silly, it has no meme potential. Even if you build a whole deck around this card to satisfy its absurd condition, it's at best an average card that's boring as fuck to play.
Nah man, if you play big hunter, you dont want to have your abominababbale snowmen rez a 2/2 token off of highmane. so if you dont run highmane, you need another 6 drop.
i think what a lot of people are missing about this card, and what ultimately gives it incredible value, isnt the relatively easy condition to satisfy to get two animal companions. The value in this card lies in it curving perfectly into the concede button. Just drop bad boy here on the board, summon a huffer, or even a leokk. then bottom right straight back to the next worthy opponent.
its 5d chess, you gotta understand
[deleted] · 305 points · Posted at 03:45:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The value in this card lies in it curving perfectly into the concede button.
Even if you build a whole deck around this card to satisfy its absurd condition, it's at best an average card that's boring as fuck to play.
This is the biggest issue I have with it. I'm all for silly "build-around-me" Johnny cards that will never see competitive play, but for those kinds of cards to work they need to actually do something cool when you manage to pull it off. With this, your grand prize for building a hunter deck with no minions is... a card that's exactly half way in between Animal Companion and Call of the Wild?
This would barely be overpowered without the completely extreme deckbuilding restriction, and the reward is too small even if you do manage the condition.
This is a card for a deck that is already built around having no minions. This card needs cards with the same limitation that are far more OP, but if that happens it will be entirely viable.
Purify is a terrible card. However, if you already have the tools necessary to build a silence priest deck, purify has reasonably good value, and more importantly adds consistency to your deck.
This is a card for a deck that is already built around having no minions. This card needs cards with the same limitation that are far more OP, but if that happens it will be entirely viable.
But that's kind of my point. Its restriction says "build around me" but its effect say "decent value/tempo card."
Sure, other cards with the same restriction could be added, and then you're building around that group of cards instead of building around one. But still, that restriction is directly telling you to keep this card in mind when making your deck.
Purify is a terrible card. However, if you already have the tools necessary to build a silence priest deck, purify has reasonably good value, and more importantly adds consistency to your deck.
Purify is a "build around me" card. It's not the only card silence priest is built around, but it's a core component of it and silence priest might not exist if purify didn't.
This might see play without the condition. I’m not even sure it would see play, but it might. With the condition, make it 4 mana. It would be a fun inclusion in the Barnes y’saraj deck, not a great deck, but it might be better with this at 4 mana.
not just a human being, many human beings. every single person on the design team saw this card, thought "yeah y'know what this is perfectly fine, add it to the set". i honestly just want them to HoF every single basic and classic hunter card so we can start getting real cards and not literal dust.
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
I think it would be interesting at 4 mana. Or having it cost 1 if you have no minions (sure one mana huffer but that’s the only minion hunter would have other than like 3 more huffers) Not so bad but amazing if you trigger it. Don’t get me wrong the drawback would probably still be too big, but at least there would be some real reward to it
Sure, but you play Animal Companion in a regular deck with minions. Still, free starting companion would actually be acceptable.
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 05:09:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
lol free starting companion would be broken. This is the classic over the top circlejerk. "Oh if this card was literally the best card ever it would still be shit because everyone else says it's bad".
jeoseo · 3 points · Posted at 06:02:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think he meant a free companion IF you have no minions in your deck.
even then you atleast had some minions in hunter lich king fight because your best bet of beating him was barnes>y'sharrj>something big like Gazrilla or hyena fledgling insanity. NO minons at all makes it actually harder.
LechHJ · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2x Molten Giants and 15-16 minions in the deck. Concede until you get both giants on the board turn 1. Ez.
I could see a meme deck running 2 Animal Companions, 2 To My Side!s, and 2 Call of the Wilds. That said, there's a damn good reason it'd be a meme deck, because it'd sit right next to freeze Shaman decks.
DrQuint · 1 points · Posted at 10:19:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
dead serious - i think team 5 spends the least amount of time on hunters design philosophy, and by that i mean, they just literally think about it on the toilet while they are on a shit break. then they get back to real work on the real classes
You're being far too kind. I get some good thinking in while on the toilet and taking a shit.
Probably meant they think about hunter design philosophy while wiping their ass after a shit break. It's a delicate balance then and most likely to fuck up one way (hunter design) or another (a messy wipe)
zzxyyzx · 9 points · Posted at 04:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Team 5 probably thinks Hunter was a mistake. They already admitted Hunter was "too strong at the lower ranks", i.e. "new players don't know how to make decks that don't lose to aggro so we must punish the class whose hero power is just aggro."
No, if they didn't try, they'd give us some random vanilla minion. Another variation of the 3/2 for 2 mana slot. This is actively trying to shit on Hunter. They didn't release a mediocre card, this is an actively detrimental card to put in your deck.
roit_ · 1 points · Posted at 08:46:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reminds me of a joke about red in MtG.
"Wanna know how to design a red mechanic? Take another color's mechanic and make it dogshit. Bam, red mechanic."
Red always seems to get worse versions of other colors' mechanics. It has impulse instead of card draw, rummaging instead of looting, damage to creatures instead of outright destruction or exile, +X/+0 instead of +X/+X, and so on.
I wonder if that's how team 5 thinks about Hunter.
Which is why blizzard's next hunter epic spell will be:
Suicidal Shot: 10 mana, spam 5 Threaten Emotes, 5 wow emotes, 5, thanks emotes, 5 sorry emotes, 5 oops emotes automatically even if your opponent squelched you, and then deal 30 damage to your own hero.
That way the they don't have to say well fought to get on to our next game. THINK OF THE VALUE!
Except a 10 mana card in Hunter would never get played. They should make it 0 mana and have it start in your hand like quests. This way, they spare you the pain of playing Hunter for more than one turn.
I actually feel like most of the Hunter cards have been interesting, even if we’ve still had to wonder how it’s supposed to support all of the expensive cards being printed. This card though... I just can’t see it, in any world. This is the first card revealed that just looks dead on arrival for me.
Well, at least we can be sure that hunter is the next shaman/priest. This is comparable to Purify, except a lot worse. But like they printed shit for priest when they were in a bad place, they are doing the same for hunter now and this phase is followed by the overbuff-phase.
Zireall · 1 points · Posted at 17:40:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
cant wait for hunter to be Shaman tier op the next expansion.
Just revert CotW so Hunter doesn't get 0.1% playrate with negative WR thanks
[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 04:18:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter has been straight busted too man times for me to feel even slightly bad for rexxar. I was there for undertaker coin leper gnome and buzzard unleash.
And then we'll all complain about the unplayability of Hunter, and Blizzard will give them the same treatment they gave Shamans and Priests.
Keetek · 336 points · Posted at 03:03:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This seems genuinely horrible.
EDIT: I don't even like hunters and I don't think they deserve a card this bad.
Keetek · 125 points · Posted at 03:09:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, this may just be the worst card of the expansion.
cndman · 260 points · Posted at 03:12:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This may be the worst card of all time. Its really bad, it has no fun or meme potential. Even when you get it to go off in the most optimal scenario its not even exciting or good.
Keetek · 42 points · Posted at 03:13:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I agree. I am absolutely puzzled how this was even printed.
Tentacles has more potential than this. Tentacles has at least an inkling of potential in super hard control warrior decks that spend most turns just hero powering and passing.
I'm secretly hoping that in about a month or two, someone makes some crazy ass Hunter deck and this card turns out to be OP as fuck. Then Blizzard comes around and we all eat crow.
Maybe that spider card that can only attack if your hero did, but at least that one they printed at rare. This is astonishingly bad. This is riotously bad.
cndman · 10 points · Posted at 04:07:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
thats a draftable card for rogue in arena.
Cliff86 · 2 points · Posted at 04:37:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's even an above average card for rogue in arena
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 04:17:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When was the last time we got a card that's twice as bad as a Basic card in nearly any realistic scenario and impossible to build a functional deck around? I think this really is a serious contender for worst card in the game.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:24:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card would barely be playable if it was no minions in your hand or your hand is empty. This is just... what?
[deleted] · 120 points · Posted at 03:08:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
DrQuint · 12 points · Posted at 10:27:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Making you excited for Artifact and the new Magic game.
That, and making me spend more christmas money on the new Gwent expansion instead of HS...I really wanted to play Hunter this expansion but at this point one of the unrevealed cards has to be bonkers for that to happen.
Tickling their nipples saying “ooooh you need good hunter cards. Sorry we can’t do that. Why don’t you find another card game? Oh there’s nothing as good? Oh that’s too bad.”
...............should this not be summon 2 animal companions. Summon 3 if you have no minions? It doesn't make sense as is. Way too bad.
F0xtails · 533 points · Posted at 04:03:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
1 companion = 3 mana
2 companion = 6 mana + have literally no minions in your deck as a hunter
3 companion = 9 mana
Seems legit to me
AlonsoQ · 93 points · Posted at 04:48:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, this is the baffling part. I get that Blizz doesn't want Face Hunter to get an 8/4 Charge for 6, but it's not even exceptional when you jump through the hoop.
Does ANYONE have ANY idea why Blizzard hates hunter
Because it chews through the meta at sub-20 ranks, where people are most likely to waste a bunch of money acquiring useless Legendaries since they're all "that one cool boss from my favorite WoW raid back in the day"
In other words, Hunter scares away potential "whales" from Hearthstone on a regular basis, and since it also happens to be the most "F2P-friendly" class, they can just nerf the fuck out of it to keep its winrate artificially suppressed with minimal financial blowback
Those decks cost way more than Aggro Hunter to create, which means that Blizzard's already happy if they exist because noobs are starting to spend serious money at those ranks already
Dominating Ranked cheaply is the one sin that Blizzard can't stand, and only Hunter's kit is inherently tuned to achieve it
Pirates needed the legendary Patches, and Shaman required LoE adventure wings (plus they were both eventually nerfed into oblivion anyway, which you conveniently forgot to point out here, so no they weren't "fine at all ranks" by the end)
In its heyday, Hunter required neither levels of up-front investment for its Aggro archetype, plus its Hero Power alone put 7/9 classes on a health-clock for no extra cost
Hunter is only considered "F2P-Friendly" because it has zero playable Epics and only one marginally playable legendary in standard (the Death Knight, which you may have received for free). It's F2P-Friendly because getting more hunter cards and using them is likely to make your deck worse.
To be fair, Purify being common made it worse as it would have screwed Priest in Arena. Blizz wisely decided it would not appear in Arena after the backlash and I'm sure this card will not appear in Arena either.
that's not where the purify hate comes from, it comes from a time when priest was a tier 5 class and got a card for an archetype that didnt exist yet.
psymunn · 1 points · Posted at 06:08:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes, and it was a mistake. but the card isn't as bad as was warranted. although leaving it out of arena was smart, because it's trash tier there, and it certainly would have been salt in the wounds
That's honestly not even a joke; I have a feeling the "whale" community is partially comprised of a fuckload of noobs who just craft "cool" bosses from their favorite WoW raids
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
How many animal companions would this have to summon in order for it to be playable? 5? 6? A hunter deck without minions basically can't win, so this card needs to be able to literally win the game by itself in order to be played.
2 for 6 would not be insanely strong at all. My thrown out there 3 for 6 (with the existing condition) would be insanely strong but 2 for 6 is just completely fair.
Animal Companion is 3 mana, Call of the Wild is 9. 3 times 2 is 6.
Akalhar · 1 points · Posted at 05:01:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I strongly disagree.
Both of those that you mention are really strong cards. 2 for 6 gives more benefit than 1 for 3.
Look at it this way. Early game, you almost never want Leokk, though a 4/4 taunt or huffer are both good. At 6 mana, you want to either push damage on their face to close out the game, or need to immediately impact the board because you're losing. You are guaranteed to do the later (at worst, you get a taunt + Leokk or failing that, a 5 attack charger. You might even get Misha and Huffer for a big board swing). If you are winning and want to go face, you are guaranteed to get at least one of Leokk or Huffer, both which really help you in that situation. 50% of the time, you'll get both.
2 for 6 would see a ton of play. Might even take over the Highmane slot in most hunter decks.
I mean I get they are trying to push "Big Beast Hunter" with these minion generating spells and the Recruit Legendary but it's going to take a few more expansions to flesh it out which stings when Hunter has already been in the toilet for so long.
Tockity · 0 points · Posted at 03:56:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the idea is to make it so you basically can't put it in a deck that isn't built around a minion-less deck, but still gives it some use if you pull it in a random effect. It'd be much better at 5 mana, in my opinion, albeit still not good.
I think it may create some interesting decks in wild, but that's about it.
Jesus christ your version is way more broken then original cotw ever was. Clear hunter's board? Nope, summon an even bigger one and take 5 to the face.
Akalhar · 13 points · Posted at 03:15:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Same I had no idea this was real until I read the comments. What the fuck is this garbage. I hope to God it's just a joke and blizzard is just grabbing our goblins right now.
Raktoner · 426 points · Posted at 03:07:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is garbage. This is almost insulting to hunter players. Who green lit this? Who looks at the state of Hunter and goes, "you know what Hunters need in the epic slot? Shit."
Hopefully whatever they planned for the epic slot got pushed down to a lower rarity to make it more accessible.
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:27:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's still bad. Because maybe for it you did get those other hunter tools, but you're still being denied, for up to 10 packs, the ability to get an epic card and other classes DO have important epic cards.
jmtz920 · 38 points · Posted at 03:42:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dude, you just put into words what I just felt when seeing the card.....I love hunter, but it’s just not fun for me anymore and cards like this don’t help. I think this reveal reinforced my decision to not spend money on the game anymore....[audible sigh]
I'm also not spending money on this expansion. I got a bit of gold saved up, enough for 60 packs, and it probably won't be enough to be competitive with the terrible dust economy.
Dude. Why can't it just be 1 mana? 2 card board clear wouldn't even be that OP for hunter.
Ildona · 62 points · Posted at 03:46:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man, that's the annoying thing here.
First, I actually think an "Oops all spells" deck for Hunter is cool. On The Hunt, Cat Trick, Animal Companion, Call of the Wild, Unleash the Hounds, etc all puts minions in play from spells. Hunter actually has more of these cards than any class.
You can pair it with secrets, Eaglehorn Bow, Deathstalker, etc pretty well.
But how the hell do you survive long enough?
You use secrets and hit things with your face to control the board until you die from using your face to control the board. Nope, can't use the Secret synergy minions because you can't have them in your deck. No Putricide, no Secretkeeper, no Cloaked Huntress.
You use taunts to stay alive? Well, no minions in this deck. Additionally, you gotta make that 33% roll to get Misha.
Oh, and in standard, the secrets that actually put minions on board? Two require your minions to be attacked. So you'll have to combo those with the new Wandering Monster in order to actually trigger them semi-consistently. The only one left is the definitely-not-a-defensive-option Cat Trick.
So, you use your spells for removal. Do you use your RNG-based Deadly Shot that, for me today, lost 12/14 50:50 chances? Or do you use your Toxic Arrow, that's a strictly worse Darkbomb for a deck like this? Kill Command is gimp without a stock of beasts to use with it. Maybe you use Multi-Shot for a bit more RNG, or Explosive Shot for a drastically worse Meteor?
And even then. Let's assume there's a deck that can get away with running this card because it has no minions in it. The hell does Leokk do in a minionless deck?
Fucking hell, Team 5. I want to play Hunter.
How the fuck does this line up against Spreading Plague in the 6 mana slot?
That said, the art and name are pretty sweet. Looking forward to the gold animation.
el3r9 · 5 points · Posted at 06:18:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You use taunts to stay alive? Well, no minions in this deck. Additionally, you gotta make that 33% roll to get Misha.
I agree with your post, but [[Bear Trap]].
Ildona · 4 points · Posted at 06:51:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
at least toxic arrow is a good bad card this is just vanilla awful. imo, it should at least be a call of the wild on 6. Big hunter would actually be funny this is depressing.
even when the absurd condition is met it's just all right mediocre card that might summon two leoks which then seem pretty bad because you dont have any minions
Everyone give it up for the worst card of Kobolds and Catacombs!!
It's been a great competition this expansion - lots of excellent candidates. Big thank you to all the other trash cards. We'll see you on December 7!
Edit: This shitpost would have been better if I cited other absolutely garbage cards (there's so many to name!) but I guess you could say I came down with a case of the 'Team 5's so I don't feel like doing the extra effort
No no no, having hard removal is against hunter's "class identity." How about:
Battlecry: Destroy your hero.
tzarl98 · 73 points · Posted at 04:53:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Now hold on. "destroy your hero" is a little too flexible for hunter. Hunter shouldn't be the best class at suicide, especially in the late game. This is way better than the old auchenai+reno combo that priest could pull off, and they need to play two cards in a singleton deck. How about:
Woah, it saves me the trouble of conceding. That's some serious powercreep for Rexxar right there. Added benefit is I can actually dodge the, "Well fought, I concede" line so as to avoid complimenting my opponent. Instead I can just hear Rexxar's dying voiceline, which seems to be the theme for Hunter this expansion rotation.
Top meme, but hard removal is 100% not against hunter's identity. Having RELIABLE hard removal is against their identity... crushing walls and deadly shot.
Zerokx · 41 points · Posted at 04:15:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what the fuck?
There is a 3 mana card that summons 1 companion, a 9 mana card that summons 3, and none of them have a condition?
And this requires no minions in the deck?? In HUNTER????
??????
??????
??????
See, this card is obviously printed so that you can play animal companion on curve on turn 6, and if you happen to run a minionless deck you get a bonus! It's amazing value!
It could eventually be good at 4 in the future once hunter gets enough good spells to support it. At 6 though, this wouldn't even be a good card in a spell only deck.
I doubt that, if this cost 4 mana you could bet your ass people would try to build around it. The insane tempo gained from 2 animal companions on turn 4 isn't something to ignore, there are games that are won just by a basic animal companion card on turn 3 already.
It would have the Discover keyword if you got a choice.
yuube · 8 points · Posted at 03:10:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m assuming for the new hunter legendary, only roll a few big minions for the recruits.
Kidsune · 30 points · Posted at 03:17:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But if you still have any minions in your deck, it's absolute garbage.
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:10:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thats the point
you get out the big minions with recruits and have a shitload of spells.
Kidsune · 2 points · Posted at 06:17:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's a super counter intuitive idea, and a terrible deck.
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:18:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard starts releasing cards for an archetype that often doesnt look good until 3 expansions later.
[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 03:18:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:08:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
im just acknowledging the archetype theyre pushing. Its obvious.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:13:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 1 points · Posted at 06:15:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Its really not, you get a few large big minions for facing and the rest are spells, we already did this before with yogged and loaded and it was a decent deck.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:23:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 1 points · Posted at 07:33:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal companion is a good card, so if you get the 2 its just like having 4 more animal companions.
So for 6 mana you get the effect you SHOULD have for 6 mana but only if you cripple yourself.
I am 10000000000000% certain there was a miscommunication and this isn't the real card, there's another comment like this already, but I'm pretty sure they're being sarcastic, I'm being real, this card actually CANNOT be real, it has no advantage whatsoever, it's literally infinitely worse than purify, and purify was bad already until an expansion improved it.
This card cannot be improved, there's nothing that will ever make this card good.
EDIT: this is my favourite thing I've been wrong about.
No, you don't get it! This card is so overpowered, Blizzard made sure to give Priest a single card with the power to shut the entire minionless hunter archetype down!
laughs in psychic scream
If there's more in the pool that are bad, youre more likely to open worse ones on average, making you craft the ones you didn't get. Not a big deal if it's a few cards, it's expected, but always shafting hunter is just icing on the cake.
That's true, though i think if you're only opening, say, 10 epics or something, I'd rather miss on a few of them and only need to cast a few, rather than get a bunch of good epics but need to craft way more. Guess we'll have to see though. Least I don't have to craft epics for hunter this expansion...
Pacify_ · 1 points · Posted at 07:42:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What're the needed epics?
I've counted 11-12 so far that have a decent chance of being meta
Looking through... yeah I can see about that same number at the moment, though a lot of them are class specific so if you don't particularly like some classes you're in luck I guess. Then again having the needed ones neutral tends to be better overall I guess..
The deck with the only minions being Barnes and yshaarj
Jgj7700 · 96 points · Posted at 03:38:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Whoever designed this card should be fired. The fact that it made it into the set makes me extremely disappointed. On one hand, the fact that it's an Epic is good because I don't want one. On the other hand, when I inevitably open it instead of a playable Epic I'm going to feel like I got ripped off.
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 03:41:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[removed]
Hermke · 3 points · Posted at 07:43:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
TIL Patches is a fired game designer. Makes sense though, I think he designed Patches and that's why he gets shot out of a cannon now. That card is still pretty busted in another way
Honestly jokes aside, this is super trash. I actually felt disgusted after looking at this card as I realised the devs only see Hunter as a starter class now, for noobies to play and win sometimes. You’re only gonna win if you have good draws on curve and if your opponent has bad draws. Now it’s gonna be even worse with all the removals other classes are getting. . 6 mana summon an animal companion? Wtf kind of defence is that? Like two of them gonna defend your board if you have no minions on 6th turn? If hunter has no minions by turn 6, it’s just bad news. Bye bye Hunter. It was fun playing you.
Edit: Holy shit this is an epic card. Bye bye Death stalker Rexxar.
I’m pretty sure that Blizz knew this card was bad when they printed it.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 05:08:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just when you thought they couldn't top the dogshit epics they gave hunter last xpac, this must be some running joke at blizzard, great way to lose customers!
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
asneon · 24 points · Posted at 03:15:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal companion is 3 and chooses a random one. This card should be 4, to be great, 5, to be fair. Since you choose the companion. As it is now it is worse than bad.
There is no way a hunter deck containing no minions would be possible so at four it would still be bad just because it’s in a currently unplayable deck.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 04:06:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
at four it would still be bad just because it’s in a currently unplayable deck.
I think he is saying that at 4 mana you would just play it in a regular deck (with minions) and it would be pretty good because for 4 mana you get to choose which animal companion you get.
You wouldn't ever meet the condition to get 2 companions, but that's fine.
I'm betting money that this is a random animal companion not a chosen one. It doesn't say random but there are plenty of cards this expansion that they leave out the word random because they are afraid that too many cards have the word this expac, or there isn't enough room on the card.
If after years and years, after countless expansions, THIS is what makes it into a viable Hunter deck in Wild, we will need a new tier system that goes down to tier 10. We will call it Rexxar Tier.
Can't have Hunter getting too good or it spooks all of the potentially profitable noobs away
dnl101 · 2 points · Posted at 10:26:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Comparing the hunter cards with priest cards is painfull. It's like an elemantary schooler made them with clear favorites in play.
[deleted] · 14 points · Posted at 05:35:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reno gives you the best heal of all time to not run duplicates. Keleseth gives aggro decks the best two drop of all time if you cut other 2 cost cards. Not all too high of a sacrifice for an insane reward.
This cuts like 90% of all possible hunter cards available for decks, in reward of a 6-drop that's worse than highmane, which requires no limitations at all.
what pisses me off the most about this is they make this an epic. You should feel pretty damn great when you get an epic in your pack...but then you open this shit.... That's terrible Team Five and you should feel ashamed.
It's an intentional effort to keep Hunter's winrate suppressed so Sub-20 noobs don't run away, taking their money with them
Waldorg · 1 points · Posted at 14:21:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's fucking insulting
Taxouck · 21 points · Posted at 03:21:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know this is my third comment now, but I'm just... Baffled. I cannot comprehend why they'd print this card. It's terrible on every level, it's basically insulting.
As a priest main I saw the up side with purify, I knew it be decent with more support. But this card. I just can't, it's way over priced for an up side not even worth the cost. At 6 man I can play two AC, people say 4 Mana maybe but I'd say 3.
This is MUCH worse. It should've been 10 mana fill your board with random animal companions or something so atleast there is a meme deck for this because 6 mana make 2 animal companions isn't even super powerful so actually wtf.
Yes but if you have no minons in your deck and you've survived till turn 10 as hunter you should atleast get to meme lol. You would have lost to any fast deck already and probably wouldn't even be able to beat jade druid with that.
This makes Toxic Arrow look like a Savannah Highmane on steroids. It is literally unplayable. Not like pre-KotFH Prince hype unplayable, like its not even possible in theory to build a Hunter deck using this card, and if you could build a no minion Hunter (you can't) this card still wouldn't be good.
Bonus: You get fucking wrecked by Psychic Scream if you play this. 2 Animal Companions? Nope, how about 1 because your opponent put all those shitty secret beasts back in your deck. Try harder next time to not queue into Priest.
You can’t even compare this to toxic arrow. I’ve played with toxic arrow. I put it in my meme deathrattle hunter deck, and it’s actually won me a few games. This card is on a level so bad that I’d choose purify over this for my hunter deck.
Nah, at least toxic arrow is playable in certain situations. I can't even imagine how this card will EVER be playable in ANY situation.
EDIT: Well, maybe it could be good if you've fatigued yourself, and that would only ever happen in Control Hunter. The card is still a piece of trash.
mr10123 · 1 points · Posted at 06:52:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Toxic Arrow is a fair card. This is more like Purify, if Purify was actually given to Warrior at the same mana cost with the text "deal 1 damage to a friendly minion, draw a card".
Nevermind, it's even worse than that. At this point, might as well just print overcosted vanilla minions for Hunter like a 5 mana 4/5.
Man, what an interesting concept - encouraging no-minion hunter builds. But why did the card have to be so anemic? Surely this could have been 5 mana for such a requirement.
Even with one minion (Thaurissan or Yogg, either way, you're missing out on the other plus Stitched Trackers), it's still too much of a risk, and you'd be playing a terribly hamstrung deck
I made a cool Hunter deck with only spells, emerald hive queen or whatever and arcane Giants that used hunters secrets and spells to summon minions and do a lot of damage. I wish I had yogg for it and a spell like this could almost be useful in it, but I feel like I would have to cut minions for it to be reliable and that would only make the deck worse.
Edit: could be insane in a refined spell hunter like mine with tracking for lethal to discard the minions in your deck and hopefully be blessed with a double Huffer.
This is a fucking disgrace. They should be ashamed of themselves. I️ seriously hope this is an error and is meant to say summon 3 companions instead. If not, the team either has no idea how to design hunter cards or just don’t give 2 shits about the class.
How the duck can you print this card when you made the Hunter legendary a battlecry and deathrattle recruit. This is pathetic
Razul22 · 9 points · Posted at 07:22:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Words fail me. Did rexxar fuck Brodes mother or something?
I know that Blizzard plans their expansions far in advance, but damn does it feel terrible when the worst class in the game gets terrible cards like this while Priest gets amazing cards like a Hellfire with a 3/3 attached or a mass Recycle.
Well, it doesn't really matter how far in advance they planned this, its shit no matter what the meta is like. It could have been made when huntertaker was OP and I still would not understand the thought process behind this card.
Jesus Christ. A 6 mana animal companion that will never fit in any deck, not even the memeest yogg and load or the new legendary no beast shenanigans. Getting this in packs is actually insulting.
This may be the worst epic ever. Just take hunter and put a bullet in its head, stop the suffering. WTF Blizzard, are you fucking serious? Is this shit for real?
This is the kind of card that makes me go "there has to be more cards enabling this coming later" because on paper the effect sucks, but a tokens only secret hunter might work.
Lol, might be good? Where's your win condition, where's your board control, the f*** you gonna do against a mage or priest whose happy to sit and search for their win conditions while you play secrets.
I'm angry because of this card and blizzard! I know I'm gonna see this EPIC POS when opening packs and know that I missed out on actual useful cards! WHY ISN'T THIS COMMON OR RARE?! WHY EPIC!?!?!?!??!?
They tend to put the weird effects at epic rarity. I imagine it's partly so they'll rarely come up in arena.
Here's a list of epic cards. You can see how many never see play. People are complaining about this one, but at least it promotes a new archetype that'll have other cards revealed unlike cards like Blubber Baron, Wind-up Burglebot, or Leatherclad Hogleader.
People are saying that by putting this in the epic rarity slot, you're making the game more expensive.
But I've seen the same argument for good cards in the epic rarity slot. There's just no winning for Blizzard it seems.
I don't mind neutral epics being trash, they don't effect the power of any specific class. Also, neutral epics can be used by any class to experiment with, so even if it's bad for one class, some other class might find some minor or meme use for it. But Blizzard has no f***ing excuse for this garbage, this trash is locked into hunter and is pushing this pointless deck type. What's good about summoning minions via spells if they cost the same mana (OR MORE WITH A BS CONDITION) vs just playing a minion? No Blizzard has no excuse for this, there is "winning" for Blizzard if they thought this shit through. There are only 2 possible explanations for this card 1) the remaining hunter cards help create this "no minions" archtype or 2) 50% (or some other high percent) of the hearthstone player-base mainly plays hunter and blizzard wants to reduce that number by making the class worse.
Unfortunately they don't buff cards ever. So we're stuck with this shitty card that people are going to open 5 of and inevitably complain about. Fucking thanks, Blizzard.
All of the Animal Companions are worth 4 mana (maybe slightly less). It would probably be run at that cost, since it's not like Hunter has a lot of great 4-drops to pick from.
Misha is a Ironfur Grizzly with +1/1. Huffer is a Wolfrider with +1/1 and a Beast tag. Leokk is a Raid Leader with +0/2 and a Beast tag. They're all 3-mana minions that gain a mana's worth of stats and sometimes a beast Tag. They're all worth 4 mana.
Worst card in hearthstone. Team 5 should be ashamed. They essentially doubled the mana cost of a card from the basic set and made it an epic to screw over players that unfortunately pull this out of packs. This is some EA level shit.
Make a class that revolves around controlling the board with minions, then print this card. This is purify for hunter except it will never see play ever.
CotW is a decent card at the moment. Not a great card, but somewhat usable. Sort of the '32/33rd' kind of card for a deck.
This makes toxic arrow look good.
Nasluc · 7 points · Posted at 03:06:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Obligatory horrible epic card for hunter... I had faith in you blizzard but you not only destroyed my hopes for hunter this year but also printed 2
horrible epic cards for hunter not even one with a little usability. I will save my deathstalker rexxar but if this becames priest year after karazhan I REALLY SUGGEST team 5 to start printing good hunter cards next year or else Im done with hunter.
Emerald needs you to save at worst 4 secrets for each copy. Meanwhile, mage only needs you to play elementals, and priest to use spells, requirements that their most played decks already fulfill.
Its probably the hardest spellstone to complete and gives you a shitty reward.
[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 04:53:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly, fuck this game, I'm not spending any more money on packs for this xpac, I usually buy maybe 10-30 bucks over the length of the expansion, but after this bullshit no more, I only player 4 classes in order to net deck cards so I can have a full set with those classes, hunter being one of them but I'm done after this, last expansion hunter got dogshit useless epics that are way too high cost and don't have any synergy and go against the deck archetype and now look here again, they are actually encouraging people to use NO MINIONS IN A CLASS THAT RELIES ON MINIONS BECAUSE ALL YOU PRINT ARE DOG SHIT SPELLS FOR THIS CLASS, HONESTLY WHAT THE FUCK TEAM 5. Is this some sort of sick joke?
Anyone has an idea on what's the purpose behind this bullshit? I mean Team 5 is not stupid, they obviously know this card sucks ass but there must be a fucking reason to release this lol
Call of the wild is 3 animal companions with no restrictions for liner mana. This doesn’t make sense at all. Why does the middle version have a restriction when the upper and lower end go together. This is some of the worst design ever in HS.
I think I'm giving up with Hunter. The team simply doesn't want to give the class ANYTHING.
I hope sooner or later they print a cheap weapon for Hunter with Deathrattle: Concede to save us the time of playing this shit class.
yokkora · 2 points · Posted at 04:12:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Change that to a battlecry
j10oreo · 3 points · Posted at 03:23:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I probably have no one other than myself to blame for wanting to play the hunter class. I just assumed finding balance between the classes was going to be a thing. That's my fault.
People are calling this card bad all over the thread when this will be the Dr Boom of the expansion and you’ll see a Barnes/Yshaarj Hunter archetype dominate the tier 1 or 2 and of course i’m kidding wtf is this card?
mhtom · 3 points · Posted at 04:38:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh my sides LUL
DemBeeZ · 3 points · Posted at 04:46:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The best part is everyone would play 2 savannah highmanes over a 0 restriction version of this card in midrange hunter decks anyway and blizzard shafts hunter anyway.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 04:59:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
More ranting: Isn't the value you get from running these "no duplicate" type cards supposed to be stronger than the normal cards? Animal companion cost 3 mana, you legit just printed a fucking epic card that has a horrible downside and in return summons 2 animal companions FOR THE SAME PRICE RATIO AS THE NORMAL CARD WITH NO DOWNSIDES. This only confirms that team 5 is just rank 20 and keeps losing to hunters, it's pathetic that these people are actually being paid to do this.
My prediction is this was call of the wild with condition but they got scared and decided to make it garbage. Small indie developer had no time for balancing I guess.
As someone who primarily plays hunter, this card is insulting. There isn't a way around it, this is the epitome of bad card design. There is no mana discount. This would never go in any hunter deck. I hope that this is the only card that uses this mechanic or I may end up abandoning my favorite class or even all of hearthstone.
OhHiBaf · 3 points · Posted at 05:29:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok Blizzard, facehunter hasn’t been a thing for years now... you can STOP FUCKING HUNTER IN THE ASS
Ok, I'm trying to wrap my head around this. I'd imagine this exists because of synergy with recruit, the idea being that you probably will run through all the minions in your deck through a game. But even then, the value doesn't seem to be there. Who fuckin knows
I never ever give a shit about crappy cards but this one? This one is inexcusable. If the community wants to riot about something this is it. This NEEDS to be changed. This is an insult. It’s a card with an extremely difficult condition to meet and your reward for meeting said condition is... nothing! No matter how you spin it... this card is just a waste. It can never ever be good. It’s not even like Call of the Wild where you get three predetermined minions. It’s random! You could get two Leokks that will power up all of the zero minions you have in your deck. This card should be 3+3=6 but it’s 3+3=shit.
Similar cards are the princes and Kazakus who all provide game warping changes for meeting their conditions, but this... this is just a joke. This is that card that you’re gonna open that makes you just go “god fucking dammit!” This is the equivalent to getting coal for Christmas. You’re gonna be spending money on getting possibly buying a card that hinders you if you try to play it! Not even purify was this bad! It found a use! But this? It’s not mana efficient, it’s not reliable, it’s weaker than its two counterpart cards, it forces you to play with an impossible deck that can never succeed, and it just plain fucking sucks!
Edit: I apologize for the outburst. In the end its just a silly little card/mobile game and its not worth cussing about. What I just wrote is NO way to leave useful constructive feedback at all. I just feel like people rag on Team 5 so much, and all they do is prove to people that they should rag on them by printing cards like this. And I know Blizz is better than that! This card's worthlessness can easily be figured out by using simple grade school math, and Team 5 should be smarter than that. Not to mention this is literally the definition of throwing money away if you open a pack with this in it since it is just math-wise useless.
This is just not the kind of card you want to be creating during a time where people criticize the cost of the game so much! And the deck that the card is asking you to build (zero minions) is pretty much impossible to make! Half the spells hunters have don't work without a target minion. It's a worse and very conditional version of CotW and AC, which aren't OP cards in the first place. It feels slapped together, extremely undertuned, and just feels like no thought was put into it, which is way below Blizzard's standards compared to their other polished games.
I sincerely hope they realize how severely undertuned this card is and deliver a pre-expansion buff to it. Lower the mana cost to 3 or 4, or raise the reward to 3 minions. Anything would do!
Honestly, then it would probably be playable. Two would be the same value per companion as Animal Companion and Call of the Wild, and 3 would be good if you were to somehow run out of minions as a Hunter.
Really, I think the only reason this exists is for people to hope not to get when they see an Epic in their pack.
Is it a random animal companion though or can you pick?
jimusah · 2 points · Posted at 03:15:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Seems like a pretty terrible card unfortunately. Theres no upside in leaving out minions to get this effect when you're already overpaying for the effect.
It seems to be written like you could discover them, still seems bad.
Rsilves · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card made me realize im playing since beta and i have never seen a hunter on fatigue... if you are out of minions on hunter you lost already
Taxouck · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Trump is gonna give this card minus 3 stars, there's no other rating possible
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I would complain about how Team 5 five are scared of giving hunter good cards, because casual rank 20 players hate hunter and their hero power, but I won't. It would be very hipocryte for my part, since two years ago when I started playing, I said how face hunter was cancer and such. So everyone (both players and devs) and everything around put hunter in a awkard position.
The good news are that hunter still have the cheap decks, since this card is doesn't belong to a current (or theorycrafted) hunter archetype. So not worth crafting.
Edit: Grammar fixes.
scotems · 1 points · Posted at 03:45:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can we please petition to have this changed to a simple "Summon two animal companions"? You know, an actual "decent" card? Right now it's just too insulting to even have it sitting in our collections.
devsoi · 2 points · Posted at 04:00:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is my favorite class, i wait every expansion for something to make the class competitive....I just dont understand why the refuse to make hunter even remotely playable! hopefully the hunter weapon is OP to make up for this bullshit!
I think this card MIGHT not be as terrible as it looks. Getting two companions means you will get guaranteed immediate impact in 5 charge damage, a 5/4 Taunt, or charge and Taunt. If there wasn't the deck building restriction, it might just be an auto include.
But that restriction is really rough, and the card is really bad. I remember hearing one of the devs talking about how much they love Yogg-n-load, now this card makes it a 'deck to try'. Would it be too good at 5 mana in that deck? Probably, but the deck will still suck. If they print more 'no minion' synergy cards, TMS may someday find a home.
Flatbar · 2 points · Posted at 04:14:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There's gotta be some kind of deck that could use this card. There's just gotta be... Why else would they print this? I... just have to believe it has a use somewhere, possibly... in some deck... somewhere
After looking at this card for like 15 minutes and trying to wrap my brain around what this card could possibly be for, I just realized it just lets you play a control hunter deck that runs essentially 12 animal companions.
2 animal companions, 2 to my side, 2 call of the wild for a grand total of 12 animal companions.
I'm not saying that this card is good, or even fucking playable. But that's probably the deck that team 5 had in mind when printing this card. But that in mind, this still might be the worst card ever printed unless hunter gets some absolutely disgusting and game breaking spells. But it won't, since all the gross spells went to priest. Looking at you, psychic scream.
This card is pure garbage. I feel genuinely triggered over this shit, it's borderline infuriating. How can other classes be rewarded with great spells and minions, or at the very least playable ones, while the Hunter class is constantly given trash after complete trash?
You could play two animal companions in the same turn, for the same effect, without sacrificing your whole deck. I mean this has to be a joke right, or has blizzard just given up on the class at this point.
liontan · 2 points · Posted at 04:23:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It’s times like this I really wish I could have been at the meeting where this card was created and given the go-ahead to be added to the game. I would LOVE to hear their reasoning behind adding this card. I can’t possibly imagine why they would do this.
Perfect card for Quest Hunter. Play Carnassa, shuffle 15 raptors into your Deck. Then play Hemet Jungle Hunter to destroy the raptors so you can play this!
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 05:54:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This should have said summon 2 animal companions or 3 if you have no minions. Where is the pay off? Even the version I suggested is dubious at best but at least there is a reward for not playing highmane.
I always try to be the guy who tries to understand cards and what kind of deck they could be good or at least interesting in but oh god... This is just bad. In every sense of the word bad.
Natoba · 2 points · Posted at 06:27:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not that I think it saves the card, but I think you choose which animal companion you summon, maybe you can summon two huffers?
Ohhh wait a minute! No I think most people are assuming its random. I just read the card txt for Animal companion And this card says just summon. You probably do get to choose.
Somebody who preordered is going to open six of these and literally commit suicide. Why the fuck is this an epic? Why is it a card at all?
Joseph Anderson has a great review of Hearthstone and in it he says he strongly suspects that Blizzard doesn't understand their own game, and I think it's nigh-impossible to say that he's wrong after seeing this. I think it would have been hard to say beforehand as well, but come ON.
Edit: The only way this ever makes sense is if one of the unrevealed Hunter cards is something like "Draw your deck"
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 07:06:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this card a joke?
86com · 2 points · Posted at 07:06:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I honestly don't know what they were thinking. Even power level aside, this doesn't make too much sense. Maybe there are some lore reasons?
It clearly has nothing to do with kobolds or catacombs. Or dungeons and dragons.
Maybe it's something along the lines of "I hunt alone, I bring no one to my hunt, the beasts just help me when I call for them"? Even then it's kind of a stretch.
With blizzards logic, for another three mana and if you put no spells either you should get three animal companions.
seikuu · 2 points · Posted at 07:22:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess it's for lock 'n load hunter, but that deck was absolute trash even when call of the wild was 8 mana, and it still used a few minions like king's elek, azure drake, thalnos, etc for cycle and spell damage. I'm also bothered that they're printing cards for wild when they very clearly don't give a shit about that format.
Feltzy · 2 points · Posted at 07:29:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the most unrealistic condition for a conditional card ever printed
Serious talk here. Why is this card a summon? They are rolling in this new recruit mechanic first of all. Hunter relies on minion heavy decks for the most part. It's a 6 Mana that you play when? To actually get the two beasts. A beast Hunter deck runs a shit ton of minions, how can this even be accomplished??
Why can't it be a recruit card first of all because that actually puts the minion in play and it can be something like recruit an X Mana minion/beast. Players can work a strategy around Mana cost of minion and when the card is best played as such. It can give the hunter the damage needed to go face and end because recruit puts the minion in play. I'm sure there are so many other alternatives but this just seems so out of place
I'm trying to comfort my self by imagining that the hunter weapon is so OP and "no minion" centered that this card makes sence in that deck. I mean this is BEYOND terrible in the current hunter state. If Hunter weapon would be so insane to justify running no minions, than MAYBE this card would be in it.
Guys you are being too harsh, how about this card in aren.. ok nevermind buck flizzard
Nico777 · 2 points · Posted at 08:49:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lmao that's proof they're doing it on purpose, if any proof was still really needed. I'm out, fuck you team 5.
Aztok · 2 points · Posted at 09:02:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh good! I was looking for a reason to not go back to hearthstone! Glad to see they’re printing unplayable shit like this, now I have a deterrent to buying packs or supporting these bandits.
If they want to print a conditional animal companion spell, it should be something like:
6 mana
Summon an animal companion. If there are no minions in your hand, summon two. If there are no minions in your deck, this costs (0).
I am playing hunter. My deck has no minions. My only purpose in life is to summon TWO animal companions. My opponent is priest. I finally draw To My Side! My opponent plays a spell which puts cards into my deck. All of which are minions...
...
...
I say nothing. To my opponent I simply look like I am deciding on what to play. But secretly I am screaming inside. I am screaming so hard, as if it were loud enough that someone would hear me. But alas, my lips do not move, and no sound is to be heard. I try to lift my hand to scroll over to the "well played" emote, but my hand goes numb... I just let the rope burn away and watch as my hp reduces to 0... All that I can think to myself is perhaps one day, one person will listen topsychic screamand hear my sorrow... today is not that day...
This card needs to be changed to having no minions in your hand instead of your deck to save itself.... this is going to get so much bad press from youtubers and pros literally starting today.
Emokore · 2 points · Posted at 18:29:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why print this? This is garbage. Look at Ultimate Infestation, as an example of an epic class spell. Now look again at this trash. Please reconsider printing this...
ben brode knows hhow much how trash this set is he wont even comment here lol what a frickin chode
We are pulling an EA everyone cancel your preorders and vote with your wallets we will not expect these expanison fillers now its not just pack fillers when the whole xpac aint worth the cash!
The weapon better summons a King Krush each turn to make this Spell Hunter work... This isn't even sinergy with the legendary... What has Rexxar done to deserve this?
unless they get all the best control spells in the game (which won't happen because blizz wouldn't allow that), I don't see it ever happening. Even if you get it to work it's still a bad card
luizjaq · 2 points · Posted at 03:30:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lock and load support? That's really the only hunter card that wants you to run a bunch of spells right?
Granted we've seen them test the waters for ideas or themes in a previous expansion (ferry man and dreamer from MSG fore shadowed the rogue/druid quests) maybe there will be more spell hunter support? Which sounds like a bad thing ATM.
Edit: oh god the hunter legendary weapon is going to be spell based isn't it?
Alarid · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's garbage. It should have cost four to even be remotely viable, because there is a lot that needs to fundamentally change about how we play Hunter to make it worth running.
If it was summon all 3 animal companions it would be garbage right? Like how do you WIN a game without any minions? Maybe some sort of barnes-y'shaarj deck but its useless when you don't draw barnes, unlike barnes warlock which atleast has renounce darkness as its backup plan, and its still a meme deck. Why does the hunter epic slot get wasted like this!!!!!!!! this is so fustrating for hunter players! Seriously try making a non minion deck as hunter... this would have to be fill your board with random animal companions and maybe cost 10 mana and maybe there would be a meme deck revolving around this?
Cards like this make me mad. Why purposely make a card intentionally under-powered. The deck constraints alone might not even make it worth it at 5 mana but at 6 it's weaker than highmane and forces you to not use highmane.
Ausphin · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
YIKES. If this is what they want, archetype will need a lot more support. lots.
Not even a mana reduction compared to two Animal Companion? This is goddamn Hunter, make its at least 4 or 5 to get it viable. Holy shit, just cause we can THEORETICALLY summon 12 Animal Companions, 4 3/3 Wolfs, and a couple of Secret animals and 1/1 does not mean we can keep both them and Rexxar alive long enough to do jack shit. I refuse to believe Team 5 made this card and thought "This card is viable." This is about as meme as you can get, if you want to make every game like the Hunter vs Lich King fight.
As a Hunter, I hate this card. 1 Companion costs 3 mana, 3 cost 9 mana. But 2 cost 6 mana and only if your deck has no minions! I can't imagine a hunter deck without ANY minions.
GDerkon · 1 points · Posted at 03:19:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I like how HearthPwn goes directy to "this is garbage" and Hearthead goes "New epic card for hunter!" on twitter...
I'm struggling to see how this will ever see play...
Does this card receive a nomination for worst card of the set? There has to be something else yet to be revealed that makes anything about this card make sense.
Honestly, I aways try to see the best in cards, and this is the first time I was completey unable to come up with anything good about this card. I even came up with something for purify when it was revealed. This card definetly seems like the worst card of the set.
Edit: worst card in hearthstone history. Does not even have meme potential.
Edit 2: I just changed my mind. It miiiight have sooommme potential.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I agree with the potential. I've built some creature-less hunter decks before (or running barnes and y'sharjj) and it's surprisingly doable to keep a board with very few actual creatures in your deck as hunter. I definitely think 2 animal companions for 6 mana is strong, but the reward isn't quite huge enough given the drawback. I still won't be disappointed to open it up though!
Then again, I CRAFTED glacial mysteries for a secret deck, so my bar is pretty low.
Blizzard obviously realized how unfair Hunter’s matchup against the Lich King is, and printed this put to help us finally get the Arthas Skin.
THANKS BLIZZ!!!!! Now I can continue to farm wins from hunters, but this time as Arthas instead of Uther!
en2nui · 1 points · Posted at 03:24:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How does a card like this get past testing, assuming Blizzard test plays all cards they create? I would love to hear their justification and process behind this card creation.
This can't possibly be correct. It's gotta be summon 2/summon 3 if or something. It's not even memeable otherwise. You could theoretically do a Secret Hunter with no small minions, but no minions at all? Your win condition is Animal Companions and maybe drawing Deathstaker Rexxar?
Would be mildly interesting if you got to choose. This is a very blatant example of them watering down the epic pool with unplayable trash. My only question is, why did hunter have to get 2 trash epics in the same expansion?
Worst card I’ve ever seen. Get a hunter deck with zero minions and for that you get to cast two animal companion’s at full cost
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:30:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card does look complete shit at first glance, but notice on Animal Companion it says 'summon a RANDOM beast companion'. At no point here does it say that the beast summoned is random.
(however even if you get to choose one the card is still real bad)
The only way i can see this card having potential is if hunter has some kind of card that hasn't been revealed yet that is "If you control all the animal companions then do X broken effect" sort of like shaman has with that totem card. If no such card exists then this is legit worse than purify.
Soulsek · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We have not seen the Hunter legendary Weapon yet ? Maybe it reduces spell cost by 2?
They make cards like this to dilute the epic card pool
Pro1136 · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess it's for barnes y'sharaj hunter
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why are they giving mage low cost aggro cards and giving hunter high costed hot garbage at the same time? I know the card designers have never booted heartstone in their lifetime, but they could at least think before printing a card. (sorry for bad english)
I mean...spell hunter is a low cost and fun archetype to mess around with...but this card is garbage, and an epic to boot. This serves no purposes other than devaluing pack opening and trying to get people to spend (more) money to get the epics they actually want
What does the dev team against Hunter? Jesus, these Hunter cards are not only bad, they're also all over the shop. Their legendary is a recruit but their spellstone is for traps.
At least its an epic so I don't have to worry about getting it!
Thalz1 · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You really can't print cards like this and not at least give epics triplicate protection. Gonna be great spending your hard earned money/gold on packs and to get 3-4 of these bad boys out of the 10-15 epics you're going to open. Hell, opening two of them is bad enough, but then at least your suffering will be over.
I said it before, they genuinely believe hunter is very powerful because of the rank 25 winrates they see. As long as they continue to interpret data like that, hunter will not get their 'turn' of being at tier 1, probably not even tier 2.
Quite LITERALLY the worst card to EVER be printed. Lorewalker Cho has more of a home in a hunter deck than this ungodly abomination. I've bitched like 10 times in the past week about the caliber of hunter cards thus far but secretly hoped the last 5 would make up for it but holy FUCK if this is what we have to look forward to the class is utterly fucked.
I am predicting our legendary weapon will be some shitty attempt at control instead of the gladiator's longbow v2.0 that the class desperately needs.
You all are missing it. Blizzard has heard our cries of the game getting too expensive. Hunter is getting shit tier high rarity cards to ensure cheap budget decks remain the way to play going forward.
This is the card that this subreddit will be 100% wrong on because most of them never played Yogg N Load or Highroll (Barnes/Ysharrj) Hunter. Might be end up being Renounce tier, but this definitely isn't a Moorabi.
Can definitely see running a skeleton crew of recruit minions that tutor each other out, can kind of see why Crushing Walls was printed (even though I still think it's awful). Will have to wait for the weapon/neutral set release to pass real judgment.
Isn't the wording such that you can choose your Animal Companion to summon? Because the actual Animal Companion has the word 'random' in it, so by comparison this one wouldn't be random?
You're not looking at the upside enough. For instance, this card reduces the cost of Hearthstone by representing one less card you'd want to collect under any circumstance
Having no minions in your deck is such an impossible downside compared to having no 2/3/4 Mana cards or only having one copy of a card in your deck like Reno, and the upside actually makes it playable instead of game-swinging. Wow.
Saber66 · 1 points · Posted at 04:07:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way I see this card being good is if the Hunter Legendary Weapon says something like: Every time you play a spell summon a beast of the same cost. Because there are not a lot of 6 Mana beasts. You play the weapon, play this card, and then get two animal companions and a free Savannah Highmane. That is the only way me thinks.
Edit: Also makes sense why Hunter would get a 7-cost spell.
I'm confused AF. Why would do you need to put "summon one animal companion" on this card? In what situation would you ever want to summon one animal companion for 6 mana? Why is this even a choice?
I think the idea behind this is to have a few minions in your deck that you pull out with Recruit effects. But summoning two Animal Companions for 6 would probably be about par for constructed play: good, but competes with Highmane, so I hardly think it would be an auto-include or anything. The restriction is absolutely ridiculous.
Delekii · 1 points · Posted at 04:19:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It makes more sense to build a mage deck with no minions in the hopes of getting this off Deck of Wonders than it does to build a hunter deck with the same condition.
I can usually spitball Blizzard's design choices and figure out where they're coming from, but ignoring its viability, what a horrendous design. A class that's about getting beasts on to the board, a class that they've also pushed deathrattle synergy on, they're just randomly giving them a card about no minion usage??? What? Comparing this to when Call of the Wild was originally 8 mana is fucking LAUGHABLE, even while its at 9 now.
Crine1 · 1 points · Posted at 04:28:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I only see one possibility for thinking it was okay to print a card like this: Hunter is about to get some crazy-good, almost game-breaking, kind of card that has an effect with the same requirement. In which case, this would just serve as a reasonable option to fill out card slots to get that deck to 30.
Im honestly in shock this wasnt a custom hearthstone card i almost skipped over it thinking it was gunna be a fan made card with some other bad synergy but wow this is so bad, i mean knowing blizzard theyre going to try to push this with some cool (but probably horribly bad) synergy cards but idk whyd theyd ever print a card like this
This must have been nerfed in the balancing stage. But this is just horrible. I bet it was probably Summon 2 Animal Companions, or 3 if your deck has no minions. That way you get a better Call of the Wild.
They shouldn't print a card this bad. Redesign it. Having no minions is a huge deck restriction and the payoff is not even that good.
ManicHS · 1 points · Posted at 04:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
(Devil's advocate...) Is there any way it could be viable in a minion-less Hunter deck that uses Animal Companion, To My Side, Call of the Wild, Unleash the Hounds, Wandering Monster, Emerald Spellstone, and Deathstalker Rexxar in lieu of minions? Hunter is the only class I can think of besides Priest that has lots of spells that summon minions
It seems like many card of this set were printed having mindall the random effect: cast a random spell, or summon minion for 8-mana or evolve and so on. I think that this card is a prime example of this way creating cards
Well you know, they have to dilute the pool of Epics. If they were all build around and necessary, someone might accuse Blizzard of being greedy.
Plus, you don't get it, this is the card that foreshadows the next expansion's mechanic of having no minions. It'll be an auto-include in 6 months, obviously.
Jokes aside, this should probably cost 5. Maybe 4.
...is this even real? How is this real? Team5 know Hunter is garbage right now, right? Why does this exist??? It's not even interesting, just complete shit!
Is there something powerful about this card that my brain can't understand or is this terrible?
styr · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THIS actually costs 6 mana?!? You have got to be kidding me, Blizzard. This is just terrible in a class built around having tons of minions! Hunter cards are a flat out a joke this expansion.
This card is trash in 90% of circumstances. The ONLY way it could see play is in spell yogg hunter. This provided you actually draw yogg. Being that draw dependant, leaving behind the core ideals of hunter, and relying on CONTROL hunter has to be one of the worst cards. Even when you get the two animal companions there isn't any mana advantage over just playing two animal companions.
I think what this shows us is that the hunter hero power massively limits design space within the class. It's consistent, puts an auto clock on the match and is extremely aggressive. Blizzard must be afraid to compliment it with cards that might actually enhance hunters ability to rush players down.
It would be unlikely for this to see play even if it had no condition, it's like if they made it so that you needed to have no spells in your deck for mistcaller to activate.
Merkdat · 1 points · Posted at 05:17:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Only way I could see this being played is if hunter gets more recruit support that's not minion based then using this after you get out your big boys for some decent damage and board presence. That's not gonna happen with the current support though, only time will tell.
HZCZhao · 1 points · Posted at 05:20:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think I can see uses for this. Let's say your deck is full of recruit a minion cards, and you can quickly draw out all your minions out of your deck. You then can play this card as your finisher. But it's still pretty difficult to use this card though
Just a suggestion. Maybe this card would fit into a high cost minion deck only that used recruit to get them out and when you run out you have DK rexxar and this card that can keep getting you cards to play
Why do they even bother printing this garbage? Seriously, this is a non-card, even the activated version is worse than [[Saronite Chain Gang]] . How can anyone competent think even for a second this card has a purpose or a reason to exist. While priest got two OP cards.
Seriously, their design process and balancing is so dumb.
So I’m going to safely assume that the hunter legendary weapon is a 3 mana 0/3 that “whenever you cast a spell, summon a beast of that cost.”
Literally the only way this card is worth anything...
Respecs · 1 points · Posted at 06:05:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe it summons different companions?!?! Like a Big Huffer 6/3 charge or Sweet Leokk 4/8 +2 attack?
Rsilves · 1 points · Posted at 06:06:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I just realized the true power of this card. This no minion hunter is the perfect counter ro minion based mage secrets like mirror image or the new fire rune. The hunter is gonna still lose but at least they cant use those secrets /s
I think there are going to be some good common recruit cards (synergize with deathrattle?) for hunter to be released (none so far at this point) and also some neutral recruit cards with and there may be an archetype of hunter deck that draws most minions out of the deck through recruit making this spell somewhat viable.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:17:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's funny, the only thing that actually confuses me about this is that even if you have no minions in your deck, the card still costs the same as 2 animal companions. Why not make it like 5 or 4? By every metric, if you're going to make a highly restrictive card with a mediocre effect... you should at least make it cheap.
Let's say you build a deck around this card, you can realistically build a deck with 3 minions (cloaked huntresses and putricide).
First, are two animal companions even that good in that deck? The face damage with charge is not that good, you won't have a lot of minions to buff with leokk, and misha is good as pseudo healing, but a 4/4 on turn 6 won't do much.
Second, you will still find yourself not drawing any of those 3 minions and have an atrocious 6 mana card, there is a reason highlander decks usually run not even 1 duplicate, there will be times where a minion will be deep into your deck and hunter spells provide no card draw.
Third, why not build a deck without restrictions and run highmane instead? well, there is no reason not to. Maybe, the deck you are trying to fit this card in does not even want to run highmane, less a worse version of it.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:23:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this has to have some yet-unrevealed synergy.
Companion support?
Heavy recruit mechanic to flood every minion early-game?
Big spells like Mage?
There's gotta be something.
avunaos · 0 points · Posted at 06:34:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
there's not, and there will not be. can't they just print a bad card and end it there? XD no point looking for any positivity
At 4 mana I'd consider running it. At 6... wow. So I'm looking forward to seeing what they give hunter in 2018 when they pull a shaman/priest and catapult the class to tier 1.
thardoc · 1 points · Posted at 06:29:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You can't even argue it's a 'just for fun' card, the effect isn't interesting in any real way. I didn't think it could get this much worse than Purify.
avunaos · 1 points · Posted at 06:36:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel really bad for the guy who had to reveal this card.
"Other streamers got to reveal meta-defining decks and I got... this... :'( "
Dakobo · 1 points · Posted at 06:39:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you could choose which companions you can summon this card wouldn’t be too bad. Emerald stone into “to my side” on curve would be pretty sweet. Yes I know the board will be cleared most of the time after you play an emerald stone, but for the rare times you are able to pull off a greater emerald stone into two huffers or leok combination its going to feel good.
Going to wait and see the rest of the cards to make final judgement.
Pretty good card for the brawl where you summon random minion after each spell. I would disentchant hearthstone if i pull this epic 6 times like furnecefire collosus last time!
xNuts · 1 points · Posted at 06:53:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You don’t have to run zero minions in your deck to get value from this card. You can use recruit to pull what minions you have from your deck into play and then this card’s condition is active.
Just wanted to point out that the recruit mechanic removes the minions in question from your deck - so it is in fact possible to play this relatively consistently in a deck with minions if you have enough recruit cards. Doesn’t make the card good by any means, but it’s less impossible to play than it initially looks like.
I think all of you are seriously underestimating this card.
This card can potentially summon 2 leokks to buff the 0 other minions you have in your deck! That is so insane I think this will be my day one 2x golden craft.
I will say this. Hunter has a lot of spells and uhh... Weapons... That you can include in your Hunter deck. Whenever I make generic Hunter deck, it's usually a slight bit heavier on non-minions than minions. Maybe, the idea isn't to play this specifically on curve, but rather after you have recruited all your minions out of your deck? That's the only way I can see this going. Assuming you've drawn at least 5 minions by turn 6, if you've used tracking and burned one or two, and recruited 3-4, you're deck is almost out of minions. Soon you will have no more minions in your deck, making this card exactly 1 for 1 valuable. Not more valuable than it should be for having a prerequisite, and definitely less valuable than say, a lot of most things. But in THIS situation, where you have recruited, drawn, or burned all your minions out towards the end of midgame, you could theoretically use this card. However, at this stage you would probably be using the 9 Mana requirement free version to try and finish up....
I think this is going to be incredibly clunky at first in a spell focused hunter, especially since currently secret hunter has cloaked huntress, putricide, and yogg. And because of hunters shit draw I would include stitched trackers. Hunters secret synergy is all minion based. I’m torn because on the one hand with minions you would never be able to play this on curve but maybe that’s not the point. If control hunter ends up actually getting the tools it needs, you can stall and wear down your opponent until you draw the last minion, or play it out of desperation for a face hit or taunt.
This seems like something that might work better after the next rotation happens. Yogg fades away along with cloaked huntress, the only minion secret hunter might need is putricide.
This just seems like it would be so much better if failing to meet the condition reduced it to 4 mana.
You know what the best part about this card is? That it will never be made better. EVER.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 07:44:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card obviously sucks right now, but it's not irredeemably bad. If ever a hunter deck emerges that actively doesn't want to play minions anyway, because of other, as-yet-printed cards that also explicitly incentivize a minion-less deck, this would be a fine inclusion in a deck like that.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:22:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why? To be perfectly clear, I'm talking about a deck that would, by its very nature, not be interested in running minions anyway, so the spell would always summon two ACs without fail, at no cost to the deck's overall game plan.
It would still be just 2 animal companions for 6 mana. That's too expensive and you won't have many minions. This means your opponent's hand will be fat with removal.
Even in a deck without minions, replacing this with Highmane would make it better.
Unpopular opinion: I'm gonna wait for the full expansion reveal before I put this card into the hall of shame, theres just no way they printed this card without a few others things to go with it..
kimvais · 1 points · Posted at 08:28:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok, looks like they had to print the milhouse manastorm of epics...
This is guaranteed to be in every 10th of your K&C packs.
Huge hunter class fan , I’m completely baffled by this card . I saw this while driving home, drove 30mins coming up with ideas why blizzard wi.... never mind long story short this card sucks !!!!
i guess you can try to play 2 copies of call of the wild and this along with rexxar and hemet in some kind of heavier midrange deck tht finishes the job with build-a-beast, highmanes and huffer spam.
This card should cost 4 OR summon 2 companions with 2 more if the conditions are met. Hell, even it did that AND cost 4 it might be too weak. What were they smoking when they came up with this trashola?
So you do get to choose the animal companion you want, it won’t be random . I can actually see this get play it will need more synergy but I see it happening . It’s a cool archetype if they push it . Some more secrets , beast generating spells . Works good with DK to make minions
Erubos · 1 points · Posted at 08:55:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Think I found a way to make this reasonable:
What if another card says “when you cast a spell, recruit a minion with the same cost”. Then this becomes a way to get your highmane out and cast animal companion for free with it. Could even be the other way around where playing a minion casts a spell.
Noobs get fucked by Hunter, the whole Hearthstone Hunter playerbase gets fucked every expansion because of it. Blizzard is visibly scared to give Hunter decent cards, because at lower ranks Hunter is good for some reason.
Spyxz · 1 points · Posted at 09:17:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way this is can even see play (at all, in meme decks) is if it was fill your battlefield with beast companions and even then it is so horribly bad in exchange for having no minions.
Xzanos · 1 points · Posted at 09:19:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Holy hell! I didn't think hunter was getting a worse epic than toxic arrow. Blizzard always has a way to surprise me.
Someone will get Psychic scream from packs, someone will get this. I hope im not the latter one.
p4v07 · 1 points · Posted at 09:31:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Another useless epic that f2p players will open multiple times and complain how they can only have 2 meta decks at best as they do not have enough dust to craft good epics.
There better be a legendary with a goddamn OP AS FUCK effect that would justify not running any minions in hunter AND run this card. Hunter is my most played, first golden class and this is such a huge shame.
OK, I just woke up. This is a joke, right? Take away that stupid condition, or at least reduce the cost or make it say no beast. I think they didn't want this to be an auto include in every hunter deck, but made it so it could only be half playable in a Barnes yssarj deck. It's a steal rogue and grimestreet informant nerf. It might be too early to say, but if ever a card needed a buff, this would be it.
plai679 · 1 points · Posted at 10:06:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well.... I know what epic duplicates imma be pulling next week.
how can one
can even suggest
such a bs card?
what cards might follow to make this card anything, but playable?
I already try to imagine a Wizard Hunter archetype (Spells, Secrets, Weapons? and mandatory DK) and it might, might be something interesting while also including some minions such as [[Cloaked Huntress]], [[Professor Putricide]], but there are def not enough cards to support this. So... See you the next expansion ;)
What the actual fuck? Is that last bit a troll? Surely? It's just double animal companion with a stupid as fuck downside. Wtf. Was this printed to help beat the lich king or some shit?
Hmm... I Hunter deck with only spells/secrets and Deathsalker.
Could that work? It could still effectively have up to 14 minions without playing a single Minion Card, 24 if you count secrets, and that's before Rexxar, which is actually pretty interesting when you think about it.
That said. I don't mind quirky cards. I mind them being epics though...
Are there enough non-minion cards to justify this? I used to run a no-minion hunter deck for questing with bows and secrets and burn and it would sometimes be able to actually beat netdecks in casual mode (happened to be very effective vs mages for some reason).
Obviously it'll never be META but it's still interesting.
I think the real question we must first ask ourselves, is the following: How much mana would you pay for 2 animal companions in one card? What is the average outcome and how useful is that to us in most scenarios? How good of a 6-drop is this compared to a card like highmane? (obviously this card is more active bc it can have immediate board presence thru +attack, taunt, and charge).
Personally I think the card itself is good when you can play it for 2 companions. Really good, infact. So now the question becomes, IMO, how much board presence (and maybe face damage) can you leverage without running minions? Which spells summon minions? Do you even need minions? Is it feasible to SMORC with BOW+secrets?
I'll be having fun with this card in the future.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:22:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
well.... I mean.....
Maybe they're still in shock over call of the wild being OP OP? (and then never played again)
I can see this as a big hunter card, you'd probably run 7 minions at best and with recruit you can force them out. A bad card for a bad deck but I can respect memey epic cards.
Mimeer · 1 points · Posted at 10:40:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This seems like a good reward for playing no minions (remeber how people understimated CoW? this is turn 6), but not strong enough a reward to make you play that deck.
Maybe in some kind of deck with only barnes and Yshaarj?
Puuksu · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i like this card
Atoonix · 1 points · Posted at 11:12:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why are all the Hunter Epics and Legendaries pure garbage. Can we at least get a designer insight by either Ben Brode or Mike Donias so they can clarify why Hunter can't be a competitive class like all the other 8 classes. We're not asking that they overdo it like they're doing with Priest but a simple Tier 2 deck which sees the slightest play in tournaments would really be appreciated!
Or I could spend 3 more mana and actually have minions and get all 3 of the animal companions!
Kolz · 1 points · Posted at 11:18:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I hate when people say “this is the worst card ever”. It’s not. There are much worse cards in the basic set and classic. People said the same about purify and that was equally stupid.
Having said that, this card is really dumb. For starters, one of the animal companions (leokk) is hot garbage without other minions. You’d need a lot more spells that summon minions to make him useful at all. Then it’s just over ousted in general I’d say, if you need to meet such a tough condition you need something above par to come out of it. This would be a lot better at 5 mana.
Rezonex · 1 points · Posted at 11:21:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Waay too reliant on Deathstalker, a legendary in a deck with little deck thinning.
Yaslav · 1 points · Posted at 12:39:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the best card in this set, for Blizzard. You get this in your pack, and you are 300 dust behind already, having to buy more packs in search for the feel of pride and accomplishment.
I was actually still on the fence about preordering, stuck between a fun looking expansion and poor business practices. Now I'm just thinking about opening 3 of these and no other epics. 300 dust in return for those.
Maybe there will be a hunter card that transforms all minion cards into spells "summon x minion"? Trying to think why this card would exsist....
930419 · 1 points · Posted at 12:55:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter has been boring and shit tier for like 3 expansions now and we get cards like this? Priest went from shit tier to great to fucking god tier with this expansion and hunters well fuck hunters according to blizzard.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:00:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So I came in this morning, as a casual player, to see "oh man, here comes some overreaction about a card that isn't that bad, will probably actually be decent in some decks, what are these loonies Complaning about now?"
.... Wow. I just don't understand this card. At all.
So you fill your deck with spells, traps, and weapons? Hmm, could use that bow with "Whenever a secret is revealed" to get more time with it out. IDK man.. pretty risky not having minions on the board but hey, this might be worth trying.
Alright all you circlejerkers we can come back to this when it's Tier2-3 (because I guarantee right now it will). This card is really good in the deck it will make
wtfduud · 1 points · Posted at 13:15:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're supposed to put this in a deck with no minions in it. Only spells to summon minions. They're pushing marksman hunter.
I thought this card was from the custom hearthstone subreddit when I saw it on my feed..
kfgasd · 1 points · Posted at 13:31:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You guys are missing something here. This is a buff against Lich king boss, obviously.
dezienn · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The one thing i do not get is why is this not 5 mana. It has a requirement it should be 5. I get that call fo the wold was op on 8 mana instead of 9, but this thing wouldnt be the same, its a lot less consistent it has a requirement it should be 5 really.
Hunter legendary weapon: At the end of your turn, recruit minions until your board is full.
AdSin15 · 1 points · Posted at 14:34:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I play hunter as a new player...this is insultingly bad. The main reason I playhunter is that I got deathstalker rexxar and prof putricide in packs I won doing F2P stuff. I had no idea about game strengths of classes...I just really enjoy building beasts and dropping secrets on the map.
This makes me question buying the new expansion. Why pay50 bucks to get cards like this?
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean... maybe if they got more card draw, you could use BuildABeast as your main source of minions? But this is just... abysmal. I’m talking worse than [[Purify]] here.
Why not just make this 3 cost. The fact you have no minions, in a hunter deck, means it is a crappy hunter deck. There are no synergies I can think of for this card, shoot even a spell and weapon deck would be running spell power minions, weapon buffing minions, and flipping yog.
If this wasn't an epic Id try a spell heavy hunter deck with the spell stone and minion generating spells.
Gossil · 1 points · Posted at 16:28:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Donais hinted that this might be good with other cards not yet revealed, and we have Recruit, but the weapon would have to be insane or Hunters would need some absurd spells for this card to even work. And it isn't that good if it works.
This is Hunter's Bolster/Purify. It's only a matter of time until the pendulum swings back, Blizzard prints strong cards for Hunter again, and it gets a meta deck that everyone hates again.
Is this a real card? It’s just so bad that I can’t believe that one, or multiple people, sat around and created this card, thinking it was a good idea. Then having it pass through whatever process happens to make it into the live game.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:50:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You know. At least Magma rager had a PURPOSE. This? This is just shite.
This card could have been pretty good, but you cant play any of the good spell synergy minions like Yogg and Arcane giants. Even if Blizzard is trying to support a no minion archetype, there's no need to put this restriction on the card. It's not like it would be on the power level of Call of the Wild at 8 mana.
There really isn't anything that would make this good; it's not like [[Purify]]. Summoning two animal companions for 6 mana just isn't good. Even if the Hunter legendary helps with the requirement, or doubles your spells or something crazy, it's still just a lackluster card.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:24:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:32:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. You know that was a shitpost right?
AND NOW I DISAPPEAR IN A CLOUD OF STUPIDITY YOU NEVER SAW THIS COMMENT OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
tot567 · 1 points · Posted at 19:37:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wtf that card is complete garbage it doesn't make any sense
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 20:03:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel like the hunter weapon will be something like "if your deck has no minions, spells cast twice" blizzard can't be trying to screw the class over this much right?
So likely this card will be complete garbage, but there has to be that one guy who goes "This is meta-defining!" I'll be that guy.
I don't know how but I have nothing to lose. If it turns out to be the worst card ever though I'll assuredly open it as my only epic.
akiva23 · 1 points · Posted at 22:29:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let's be real. In a vacuum this is not worse than purify and people found a way to make it work. I'm not saying it's good but maybe after a little while with some more support, we'll get a really sweet tier 5 or 6 deck.
I'm sick of seeing hunter get shafted with the worst class epics compared to the other classes. Seriously for the past two expansions, no decent hunter deck uses any class epics from the recent sets because of how low their power level is or simply the fact that they're just terrible.With the exception of rat pack I guess, but even that doesn't see much play nowadays. Like hunter has been for the longest time and still is one of the worst classes to play and yet the developers have the audacity to continue giving hunter this type of treatment and that infuriates me. I get it that not all epics are supposed to be a game changer, but for fuck sake man as a previous hunter main, I am bored of relying on mostly the class cards just have a reasonable chance to play against the other classes.
This card could see play in a Barnes-Y'Shaarj Hunter, but only because most Hunter spells are bad enough that you have to use shitty spells just to reach 30 cards. And even then it probably still won't be worth running in that deck because it will only be active on turn 6 like half the time.
sdaval · 1 points · Posted at 02:30:50 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know this is an old post but I've scrolled through the bulk of the comments here and on the majority of the other shit posts about this card and haven't found the answer to this: Does this card summon two RANDOM Animal Companions or do we get to choose?
"Not every card is going to be meta defining, but this card has great personality! Yeah, you have to remove everything from your deck that allows you to compete with the other classes, but the payoff is huge! Plus, mages that get this off of their random spell casts are going to be happy (maybe!)"
Geniii · 1 points · Posted at 03:50:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you fulfill a Highlander condition, you get 30 health, a Kazakus potion, a free hero power. If you fulfill having no freaking minion in your deck, you get a mere 1 card advantage? How is this fair?
Hahaha, so this solidifies my plan to only spend half my gold this expansion. Fuck you Team 5. If you are already behind in threats, summon a random eight mana worth of stats for six mana.
If anyone needs me, I will be throwing matches as Rexxar at rank 22, both so Team 5 might eventually print Hunter cards, and so Mike Donais can reach rank 20 and start complaining about Priest instead of Hunter.
In all honestly, the card probably still sucks, but thinking about it a little more, i think I see where Blizzard was coming from when printing this card. Hunter is probably the only class that can win games without any minions in it’s deck. With weapons, skill commands, regular animal companions, steady shot and DK Rexxar, hunter can win games with absolutely no minions in the deck. I’m not saying it would be good, but hunter is probably the only class that can win even one game with no minions in its deck. That’s why Blizzard designed hunter’s fight with the Lich King in such a way that you had to play as little minions as possible. This card has a home in a meme minionless hunter decks, which can actually expect to win every one out of twenty games. So I guess because of that it does have some meme potential? That’s the best I can come up with to salvage this card. Blizz would have to print some broken cards to make minionless hunter good though. Like seriously broken cards. Like this card would have to be like 4 mana or something. I just realy hope the hunter legendary weapon wasn’t solely made for a minionless hunter deck.
Idk if this is a joke or not, but if it’s not you do realize that Yogg’s battlecry won’t trigger when you recruit it right? Also hunter has no spells that recruit a minion.
I don't know why there's so much hate for this card already. The hunter weapon hasn't been revealed yet and there's a good chance that there's another hunter spell that hasnt been revealed. It could be conditional card draw that requires you to have no minions in your deck.
(x2) tracking
(x2) hunters mark
(x6) secrets
(x2) Animal Companions
(x2) UTH
(x2) Kill command
(x2) Bow
(x1) deadly shot
(x4) Hunter legendary weapon
(x2)spell stone
(x2) to my side
(x1) crushing walls
(x1) Rexxar
(x2) Call of the wild
I made this list off the top of my head but I can only assume there's a must run spell in the Commons to make the archetype work and the hunter legendary weapon to have some synergy. Could definitely see it being a 4/7 mana cost weapon that curves well in hunter and doesn't compete with other cards.
TL;DR
Don't hate before all the cards are revealed. Could open up control hunter archetype in the future.
dude, even if this costed 4 mana, unless a fucking miracle happens, it would see absolutely no play above rank 15. hell, even above 20.
jayceja · -1 points · Posted at 04:47:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is not good because the no creature hunter deck is not good. But I think that the card is probably at a completely reasonable power level if it's played in the bad deck it's meant for, so I'm ok with this card being printed for that archtype that I'm sure a lot of people probably want to play for fun.
If hunter is going to continue to be terrible this expansion with 9 other cards that are not this, one more different card probably wasn't gonna swing the difference without being completely fucked.
what makes me wonder how this got through all the people working on it, is how its so fucking bad, and is also not fun to play. even when you get it to work and live to tell about it, youre telling about how you summoned a misha and a leokk. fun times.
jayceja · 1 points · Posted at 04:31:24 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
The fallacy is that people don't realise that cards don't need to be 'silly' or 'crazy' or 'fun' to be good additions in decks that are.
Before everyone says this card is trash we should probably wait for blizzard to show the rest of the cards. maybe they are bringing cards that synergize with this. Maybe the return of Yogg-Saron hunter.
I don't think this card is quite "worst card ever printed" level, but it definitely is forcing a specific deck archetype that may not be competitive. But really, when you think about it, Hunter has, now, 6 cards in a deck that generate animal compantions. 2x Animal Companion, 2x To my Side, 2x Call of the Wild. Add to that that you can have some minions/beasts and recruit them with the hunter legendary, as well as more creature creation via DK Rexxar and Unleash and Bear Trap and Panther trap... I wonder if just maybe this deck is playable in meme situations.
inb4 team 5 sneak buffs it to summon two normally then three if you have no minions. I'd play that in big hunter. Hopefully the card just doesn't actually exist somehow
So this spell is for Yogg, right? Not Yogg'N'Load, but for when your last card is Yogg and you play it as a Hail Mary. This will show up on Trolden pretty quickly with someone getting huffer(s) for lethal.
I don't know why everyone seem so mad about this card. Crushing walls is waaaay worse. This card can actually work in Ysarj hunter where 2 your minions are Barns and Ysarj. Well, you replace them. Not sure why you have to do it, may be after rotation you have to. But still it should cost 5 mana though.
This will be a great card for Yogg-Saron to randomly cast in my 29 Spells 1 Yogg mage deck.
Actually, it WAS a 29 Spells 1 Yogg mage deck, until I teched in two Babbling Books cause I figured they're basically spells. Not anymore with this card. Gotta adapt to new metas, y'know?
Am I thinking wrong or won't that mean as long as you have all beasts in your deck you'll just used animal companion twice when you use this card? Or do they consider beasts as minions.....
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 23:44:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It summons both if you have already barnes>yshaarj>yshaarj. Might be a decent one off in that list in standard since hunters struggle to find enough non minion cards to fill out the deck.
Yea but at that point you either win the game on the spot, or, they have an answer for it and your whole deck is fucked anyways. And if you don't draw Barnes this card is a 6 mana animal companion at which point you probably already lost because you haven't played a minion all game
In my experience from playing this deck before the last rotation, it is definitely possible to win games that aren't decided by the barnes yshaarj cheese. From KotFT Deathstalker Rexxar gives you an alternate win condition if they deal with the Barnes Yshaarj. Other games can be won with the hunter hero power and face damage from tokens.
The deck lost a lot of cards in the last rotation and, before this expansion, hasn't had many cards to replace them. For reference, some of the cards lost were lock and load, power shot, bear trap, quick shot and ball of spiders. Some of the cards gained have been grievous bite, deathstalker rexxar and venomstrike trap. Since you need 28 non minion standard hunter cards there are some pretty borderline cards which could be replaced by this new card. It still might not be in the top 28 since K&C has already added the spellstone and new secret, but I think it's worth a try as one of the last cards in a tier 5 meme deck.
I guess yea, but I was speaking from a competitive standpoint. Of course you can say anything is viable at rank 25. I know all about the meme Barnes deck. I used it to gain my last 20~ wins for golden hunter. The problem with this new card is it doesn't even have meme potential, it's either a dead draw or you probably lost or won depending on if you drew the nuts. I can't fathom any card that will make it work outside of giving hunter some REAL removal. But if that actually were to happen we wouldn't be sitting here discussing which meme hunter deck is going to make the class even worth playing because theyd actually be competing.
I apologize for the run on sentencing and formatting, I tend to do that when theory crafting.
Big beast hunter seems to be Blizzard's theme for this next expansion. Recruit works really well with this card, thinning your deck of minions really fast.
even then this card is bad. hunter needs early game minions to survive, even if they aren't beast, this is just BAD, even at 4 mana would been bad because of no minions
Wow. I was hoping the whole time to the reveal that it wouldn't be 6 mana. What a joke of a card, you build your deck around their subpar spells and you get what, two low rolls on animal companion? This effect would be okayish without the restriction, blizzard are trying to make them a joke now...
The fact that people think this card is bad is blowing my mind. Hunter probably has the most ways to play minions without actually playing minions. I think spell hunter could be a really interesting archetype.
I actually think this is an incredibly good card. if you're already cutting your savannah highmane for spells in say a yogg and load hunter, you don't have a turn six play, so you're getting the value of two 3 mana cards, at six mana, but while only having to play one card. That gives you a whole nother card with which to concede.
I can see this as a big hunter card, you'd probably run 7 minions at best and with recruit you can force them out. A bad card for a bad deck but I can respect memey epic cards.
its like they tried to make another reno
but worse
GNGJ · -2 points · Posted at 03:27:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let's think about possible synergies. How about another new spell that repeats a spell that you just cast?! Now you get 4 ACs! Is that worth two cards and 6 + x mana? I'd say yes. Let's wait and see what drops on Monday before coming to any conclusions. If nothing shows up then we know that Team 9 has truly created one of the worst HS cards ever, and basically hates Hunter.
Edit: Team 5
Soulsek · 3 points · Posted at 03:30:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Didn't expect them to forge a worse card than the 2/4 9 mana costing recruit a dragon card. But they did in the same expansion!!
Saved comment
I_AM_Achilles · 2816 points · Posted at 03:40:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel like every expansion there is a card that reddit tears apart and berates as completely unplayable that goes on to later be an integral part of the meta.
This is not that card.
12/7 Edit: This is really happening, isn't it?
ZombieMonkey7 · 449 points · Posted at 06:04:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You set me up so high with that comment and smacked me down as hard equally, played like a god damn fiddle.
superduperfish · 8 points · Posted at 16:47:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Such a lust for playable hunter cards? WHOOOOOOO?!
[deleted] · 53 points · Posted at 08:14:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unless Hunter's weapon is "whenever you play a spell, summon a random best of the same cost"
arrrer · 16 points · Posted at 14:16:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's... That could be viable! Time to make it a 9 cost weapon just to make sure it isn't too op.
OtherJesus · 4 points · Posted at 15:01:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good thinking. But the weapon will probably cost 9 so... Unless the weapon costs 4 or under it's not happening.
Zama174 · 2 points · Posted at 01:32:40 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh you sweet summer child. pets all my ooze and other weapon removal minions.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:42:39 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm not saying the deck won't suck, but at least the card would be viable if that weapon existed for like 1 mana
Zama174 · 1 points · Posted at 07:17:18 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
And you could have five of them. Maybe.
BlazedBoy · 1 points · Posted at 16:37:38 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
That... belongs in a museum!
LeSquidliestOne · -1 points · Posted at 18:29:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Aha! Call of the Wild was actually buffed! Wait, no, just kidding, 9 cost minions are fucking garbage
Edit: Random beast, not random minion. My dang
[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 20:25:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
LeSquidliestOne · 2 points · Posted at 20:32:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I didn't realize the comment said beast. In my defense, it was misspelled :)
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 20:36:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
LeSquidliestOne · 4 points · Posted at 20:37:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, but two Mishas from To My Side :)
PM_OUTDATED_MEMES · 2 points · Posted at 22:00:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean I'm not gonna complain about hadronox, that'd be okay to bring back some zombeasts with
Cryzard · 1 points · Posted at 19:07:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Priest says hi
[deleted] · 21 points · Posted at 04:21:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don‘t think so either. Even if you meet the condition, it doesn‘t come into play early enough. Should be 5 or 4 mana to be evaluated like that.
Though I can definitely see new hunter archetypes becoming a thing in the near future should blizz decide to print one or two overpowered hunter cards.
Veratyr · 5 points · Posted at 09:43:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah this is going to be one of the rare times where everyone is right. This card sucks.
mszegedy · 9 points · Posted at 06:47:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's remotely possible that in the next expansion or two, Hunter will get a bunch of bonkers "no minions" synergy cards, and this will get played. Cue Ben Brode laughing at this thread.
SerellRosalia · 20 points · Posted at 10:10:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
ADwards · 4 points · Posted at 12:53:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Having a moment, what's the spell?
paulibobo · 10 points · Posted at 13:00:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Psychic scream.
DLOGD · 3 points · Posted at 14:35:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To be fair, Psychic Scream shuts down every strategy that's not just killing you from an empty board in a single turn.
Final_Hatsamu · 2 points · Posted at 07:09:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ain't we getting the Standard rotation after this expansion?
mszegedy · 3 points · Posted at 07:12:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, but this card stays in. We're stuck with it for over a year.
MixesQJ · 1 points · Posted at 10:19:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I haven't paid much attention so I would really love to see the examples of such cards!
PistolPojken · 1 points · Posted at 19:06:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I love you.
the_great_magician · 1 points · Posted at 23:59:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What are some examples of that happening?
I_AM_Achilles · 1 points · Posted at 00:03:10 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Prince 2, purify, Lyra.
berimtimlo · 1 points · Posted at 02:12:03 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
It seems like I'm the only one that thinks this is not only playable, but good. There's a lot of cheap beast decks and this slots in better than highmane. I've played a lot of games where playing this on turn 6 and getting two 4/2 charges ends it.
I_AM_Achilles · 1 points · Posted at 04:24:59 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
For this card to go off on turn 6 you can’t have any minions in the deck.
sparta0703 · -11 points · Posted at 06:33:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
LOL
CrazyFredy · 15 points · Posted at 07:37:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
xDDDDDDDDD
soursurfer · 3011 points · Posted at 03:14:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you run no duplicates you can heal to full. If you run no minions you can summon 2 Leokks.
[deleted] · 661 points · Posted at 04:41:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
... for only twice the price!
King_Khoma · 14 points · Posted at 19:05:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
pay twice the price, get 1 free!
[deleted] · 115 points · Posted at 06:29:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
Ninesixx · 8 points · Posted at 06:40:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The card is trash for sure, but better that it's an epic so viable hunter decks stay cheap.
letmepick · 5 points · Posted at 10:16:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That makes no sense. This card is bad for the Epic pool because you can open most if not all Commons with 20-30 packs and/or craft the rest. But open this and you cry while someone else opens an obviously good one.
SoepWal · 10 points · Posted at 15:56:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Since opening an epic does not reduce your chance of opening another epic, I'd still always take the epic over another common.
door_of_doom · 2 points · Posted at 17:03:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Think of it this way: good or bad, you will have all of the commons very quickly, and thus all commons very quickly become Auto dust. You want to avoid dusting Epics because they are relatively rare. Dusting 4 bad epics to craft one good epic is so much worse than someone else that simply opened 4 good epics. Bad epics cards are bad for the game.
jgomez315 · 293 points · Posted at 03:42:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
actually lmaod
bokchoykn · 18 points · Posted at 06:32:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You should be a little concerned if your ass actually fell off from laughing.
blacktiger226 · 2 points · Posted at 09:21:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Leprosy is horrible man.
breadfag · 1 points · Posted at 00:46:26 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel icky
assassin10 · 10 points · Posted at 03:35:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'd expect it to not summon two of the same.
SomberC-thun · 28 points · Posted at 04:29:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's can and it will
assassin10 · 4 points · Posted at 04:32:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Source?
BakuchiDancer · 7 points · Posted at 04:34:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Murphy's Law (probably)
Oscredwin · 3 points · Posted at 05:29:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Two Huffers is pretty great.
defaultgameer1 · 1 points · Posted at 05:36:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Kinda feels like this would be a last ditch effort play card. When you have 3 cards in the deck and. Nothing else kinda plays.
SomberC-thun · 4 points · Posted at 04:33:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh I'm Just assuming it works like the normal AC. I have no source. Sorry :(
DildoRomance · 5 points · Posted at 08:20:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Looks like hunter is in the "purify" stage class cycle. We should expect some pretty broken cards for hunter for 3 next expansions!
MachineGunPablo · 2 points · Posted at 09:57:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And for six mana which is the price you would normally pay
RGBarrios · 2 points · Posted at 12:08:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 Leokks are not bad... when you have minions on the board (or in your deck)
PMMeSmilingNudes · 2 points · Posted at 05:56:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Looks like it's for late game in a deck that is heavily recruited as a get out of jail card once your deck is out of minions.
jaycshah99 · 14 points · Posted at 06:20:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How does summoning 2 animal companions for 6 mana help you in the super late game compared to all other late game decks, nevermind how hard it would be to recruit all your minions out and how bad this would be sitting in your hand until then, especially as hunter which is the worst equiped class to go late game?????
FearStreak · 1 points · Posted at 07:10:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter Death knight shouldn't need any more minions cuz heropower. A few tempo minions and recruiters (or draw specific cards like Curator and Patches) to guarantee they're all out, Hunter can really make use of all its gimmicky spells, including the 2 mana spell that refills your hand with each consecutive spell (nvm. I don't think that's standard still). Also hunter is getting a new hard removal card, also specific to lategame. The card itself still relies on a tempo deck that has an established board, but anyway, i can see play this card as apart of a new hunter deathknight archtype but yes it won't fit into other Hunter decks.
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 10:08:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If this makes it into any tier 2 or above viable metadeck I'll give you a plum floating in perfume served in a man's hat.
heseme · 1 points · Posted at 13:37:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
/remindme when it's plum floating time.
firinmylazah · 1 points · Posted at 15:38:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're so amenable, Moe.
GetEquipped · 7 points · Posted at 06:51:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Isn't there a card that summons all three animal companions for 9 mana still in standard?
Alphagaia-reddit · 1 points · Posted at 12:09:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It does not say random though. I'd rather pick two Huffers.
RektumRanger · 1 points · Posted at 23:30:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I may be thinking wrong but it says no minions...so that means as long as you run an all beast deck this card isn't as terrible as it sounds? I think of it like having 6 copies of animal companions in your deck.
MuricanIdle · 0 points · Posted at 08:32:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The card text is not "if you run no minions..." but rather "if your deck [currently] has no minions." Once you have drawn (not necessarily played) all the minions in your deck, you get the full benefit of this card. If your point is that the full benefit of the card is probably not worth the downside, I concur.
Iamjadedaf · 0 points · Posted at 11:52:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Sorry how do you heal to full? I'm confused ahahah
Wafthrudnir · 2 points · Posted at 13:11:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reno Jackson.
Iamjadedaf · 0 points · Posted at 14:17:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh ahaha okok thought it was referring to some janky combo with this shyt card lolol
Adum_Coweek · 3253 points · Posted at 03:03:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
......what?
Dangarembga · 1365 points · Posted at 04:04:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
1 star now and in the future!
Emi_Ibarazakiii · 525 points · Posted at 04:31:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Trump talked about adding a 6th star for some cards... Think he might had 0 star ratings for this one.
Phaelynx · 19 points · Posted at 04:34:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You mean 6 stars.
Emi_Ibarazakiii · 54 points · Posted at 04:42:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean maybe there's a way to use it... Maybe upon playing this, your opponents will laugh for 2 minutes straight so they skip their turn and the card is like a '0 mana summon 2 animal companions' because you get 2 turns in a row?
I seriously have no idea what they were thinking.
Phaelynx · 1 points · Posted at 05:11:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah probably. This is so incredibly bad anyway XD
t3hjs · 24 points · Posted at 05:33:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And in the Trump reviews Trump reviews Trump reviews KnC,..... still 1 star
Adum_Coweek · 299 points · Posted at 03:03:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
????????
TicTacTime · 68 points · Posted at 03:16:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
?!?!
Kryptic_Void · 28 points · Posted at 04:58:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
NANI?
selectrix · -2 points · Posted at 05:11:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Boku wa mou shindeiru.
grapeintensity · 5 points · Posted at 03:39:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
‽
lupirotolanti · 0 points · Posted at 03:27:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
yes.
[deleted] · 28 points · Posted at 04:14:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
https://m.imgur.com/gallery/Jx8pC
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lmao man I literally knew what you were gonna link to before I clicked.
_element91 · 5 points · Posted at 03:26:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
?????
reddit_abdullah · 6 points · Posted at 03:30:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
Plague-Lord · 98 points · Posted at 04:23:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Doesn't make sense, it should 5 mana at the most so it's a discount on two Animal Companions if you fulfill the requirement.. at 6 mana its just saving you a card with a punishing requirement of not having minions.
Maybe they want Yogg/Spell Hunter or Trap Hunter without minions to be a thing..?
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 08:24:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They started call the wild at 8 mana and it was oppresive. I'd like them to try this at a discount 5 mana first, but meh.
_shiv · 2 points · Posted at 02:40:56 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
True but this has an insane condition on it which cotw doesn't. Discount should be for the condition.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:02 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'd say that as it won't be played outside that specific deck type, that the cost is fine.
Plague-Lord · 1 points · Posted at 08:43:40 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
It wasn't oppressive at all compared to what people are doing now with things like UI, Anduin, Bonemare, etc.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:21 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Agree on UI, but not bonemare. At least there is something you can do about BM
wwphd · 1 points · Posted at 05:32:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There is a deck floating around that is basically Secret hunter + rexxar + yshar / barnes.. it could kinda work in that but at that point you wanna just be rexxar at 6 and using the next 6 mana for a zombeast.. i dunno
OtherJesus · 3 points · Posted at 15:11:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unless they came up with his card at the last minute, it wouldn't make any sense because that deck hardly sees any play and has only been floating around recently. And it's a really bad deck.
Even so, this card should be 5 for a discount.
russellgoke · 1 points · Posted at 16:14:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They will need to print actual good cards for that to happen
blackhawkxfg · 1 points · Posted at 19:31:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Cutting Cloaked Huntress & Professor Putricide alone makes this card garbage in secret hunter, let alone not having minions other than what your DK makes
qordytpq · 150 points · Posted at 05:44:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They just want Hunter players to feel a sense of pride and accomplishment when they win
not_the_face_ · 15 points · Posted at 11:07:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To be fair I'd feel a sense of pride and accomplishment if I won with this in my deck.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:51:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
HAHAHAH
Mordin___Solus · 109 points · Posted at 04:12:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Something something... card games need bad cards... something something.
plknz · 161 points · Posted at 05:31:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a card designed to teach players what makes a good card game worth spending money on and when to save your money and take your business elsewhere.
[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 07:49:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Bravo sir!
DoctorWaluigiTime · 3 points · Posted at 14:36:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally the reason bad cards exist. "Teaching" is such a bullshit argument. If that were the actual reason then you would have bad cards in tutorial modes or whatnot.
But no, it's not "shitty design" or "we need filler cards so that players spend more time/dust/money", it's "a teaching moment."
Zellyff · 10 points · Posted at 05:30:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ya but bad cards should make you think more then...
Shit team 5 doesn't know what they are doing
BananaCucho · 3 points · Posted at 05:50:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just came to that realization now?
mcinthedorm · 226 points · Posted at 04:11:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know Team 5 stubbornly refuses to buff/change cards... but this is one they just have to make an exception. I literally feel insulted by this card and closed out of Hearthstone for the night
OxyRottin · 48 points · Posted at 10:01:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I was thinking the same thing. The card is so insanely bad it makes me question the competence of the designers. Maybe we're all missing something they found in testing, but I'm still holding out for the fact that this was misinterpreted somehow.
Fyrjefe · 9 points · Posted at 14:20:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe it did well versus their in-house highlander taunt druid specialist.
austynross · 1 points · Posted at 19:41:04 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
#unicornhunter
xXx420-N05c0p3xXx · 0 points · Posted at 15:40:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Important part of a card game is to also print bad cards. This is a severely underpowered one. The only thing that irritates me is that it is an epic.
Soda_Muffin · 63 points · Posted at 04:04:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
For the Barnes-Yshaarj decks that win like 25% of the time i guess.
blakato · 14 points · Posted at 04:21:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I️ dunno I️ play Barnes yshaarj hunter and I️ have a solid 65% winrate
At rank 20
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 06:28:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the idea behind this is that you recruit all the other minions in your deck and this is something to use after. Except, you know, even then it's a dead card in your hand for most of the game and even when played it's a 6 mana use two 3 mana cards.
blakato · 5 points · Posted at 06:45:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Secret hunter decks that are light on minions are actually a lot more effective than people give credit for. I️ think this is flat out for a yogg’n’load-esque spell deck rather than a recruit deck.
DildoRomance · 2 points · Posted at 08:14:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Both still use some minions though. Or are you gonna wait till turn 15 to draw all your minions to play this??
blakato · 2 points · Posted at 08:17:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, you’re going to play builds that don’t run any minions at all and instead use the spells that generate minions that hunter has and deathstalker rexxar to make do.
Soda_Muffin · 1 points · Posted at 16:15:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The steep cost makes me think some guy in testing went on a streak with the no-minions deck and this was somehow the result. Maybe Hunter will get some spell-jousting stuff like Mage is.
Simplici7y · 1 points · Posted at 09:43:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
so how are you still rank 20 with 65% winrate? :thinking:
blakato · 3 points · Posted at 09:43:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Low game size and starting from lower than rank 20?
Don’t question the joke too much lol.
17inchcorkscrew · 3 points · Posted at 08:10:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Actually, a barnes y'shaarj hunter featured in vS's 70th reaper report hit rank 2 legend on EU last month.
iareslice · 4 points · Posted at 05:06:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What's the point of Yshaarj if you can't play any other creatures?
Tedrunai · 10 points · Posted at 05:25:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You Barnes into guaranteed 1/1 YGod into guaranteed 10/10 YGod. It's a gimmick deck that relies on cheating out a 10/10 on turn 4 and loses otherwise (and if they can clear it). It's like shitty Big Priest with fewer win conditions but highrolls harder.
blakato · 2 points · Posted at 09:38:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It actually has another win condition of eagle horn bow and hit people in the face while Generating minions from hunter spells and rexxar, which while not necessarily a good win condition can still win games even when the opponent kills your Y’shaarj.
cowerino_kripperino · 130 points · Posted at 03:34:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...nani?
MrDollSteak · 101 points · Posted at 04:37:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is already dead
Stewdge · 5 points · Posted at 05:48:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
pans up to the sky
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?
DaHaLoJeDi · 6 points · Posted at 04:15:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nani the fuck?
screamer19 · 7 points · Posted at 04:56:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Omaiwamo...Shindeiru
Ununoctium117 · 5 points · Posted at 06:23:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
お前はもう死んでいる。
Zidgia · 3 points · Posted at 04:06:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
nan desu ka?
mikeylikey420 · 8 points · Posted at 04:00:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i just cant believe how awful this is.
Domster_02 · 3 points · Posted at 04:13:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
......why?
AllenWL · 3 points · Posted at 04:20:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Obviously, it's to help people beat the lich king as hunter so they can get that shiny new hero.
Powatanner · 2 points · Posted at 05:30:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
UMMM
hearthscan-bot · 5 points · Posted at 05:30:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
1 Mana 1/1 Pirate - Has +2 Attack while you have a weapon equipped.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
bruisesandlace · 5 points · Posted at 05:36:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...good bot?
Brogosh · 2 points · Posted at 05:55:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even if it summons 2 animal companions of your choice under the same condition it will just be mildly viable in specific deck.
Orangebeardo · 2 points · Posted at 11:35:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally my reaction as I opened this, and by the looks of your comment score we weren't alone.
socopithy · 2 points · Posted at 03:58:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
lol I’m dying. Best reaction.
Blackbirds21 · 1 points · Posted at 18:18:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I said this out loud as I read the card... but mine was more "what the fuck is that...?"
Waaailmer · 0 points · Posted at 05:07:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is obviously the purify of this expansion. I can't wait until everyone is laughing later when Hunter is tier 1 after they print more cards like secrets/spells to sustain a hunter while they run Animal Companions,
Call of the Wild(Shit that's rotating soon), Deathstalker Rexxar to steamroll their opponents in the late game.What I'm saying is, don't count this card out, Hunter is getting a cool archetype I think
narfidy · 820 points · Posted at 03:11:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
+3 mana for a conditional upside
Holy fuck this is one of the worst cards I've ever seen
lantranar · 427 points · Posted at 04:11:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
'upside' ? thats +3 mana to gain the exact value it should have had to begin with.
plknz · 130 points · Posted at 05:40:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah but it’s on one card dude. It’s like having four animal companions in your deck if you have no minions!
Armorend · 75 points · Posted at 07:11:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Six if you have two Animal Companions, as well! And holy fuck, TWELVE if you have both Calls of the Wild!
secar8 · 18 points · Posted at 12:31:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Companion hunter archetype confirmed
TheFaster · 11 points · Posted at 14:23:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter weapon: Battlecry: Deal 2 damage to the enemy hero for each Companion you've summoned this game
aboutdatlife · 6 points · Posted at 15:50:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
they need to print a n'zoth-like card that resummons all animal companions that died that game
koolionessfull · 6 points · Posted at 08:19:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
dude you can run animal companion and call of the wild and thats 12 animal companions!!!!!
OtherJesus · 3 points · Posted at 15:15:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's a dozen animal companions!!!!! A dozen!!!!!
Donut Hunter confirmed.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:39:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
He means "take Animal Companion, add three mana, and then give it the conditional upside that it can summon two animal companions."
lantranar · 5 points · Posted at 09:59:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
that s my point : if you have a conditional "bonus" that worth exactly what you paid for, then it is no upside. Its not like i disagree with him or anything, we all know how shitty this card is.
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:13:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I thought some shut like Priestess of Elune was objectively the most unplayable Hearthstone card, but now, looking at this, the bar is set too low.
Bakanogami · 2 points · Posted at 15:18:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When I first heard about this I didn't see the mana and figured it was probably 4. At 4 it'd be bad, but I guess maybe in some weird lock and load deck?
But 6? What the fuck?
Cayenne321 · 1 points · Posted at 09:58:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Serious question: With that condition, would this card even see play if the upside was the entire ultimate infestation effect?
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Absolutely not. Reno Jackson would not see play with this absurd restriction.
Fatal1ty_93_RUS · 1 points · Posted at 16:21:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or just run two animal companions as usual
narfidy · 1 points · Posted at 16:22:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I love build diversity!
The_Homestarmy · 1297 points · Posted at 03:09:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hot take: one of the worst cards ever printed.
Dialgak77 · 388 points · Posted at 03:32:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And it's epic...................
Dartkun · 214 points · Posted at 03:44:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Rip all the people who get like 7 of this epic and zero of any other.
AudioSly · 5 points · Posted at 04:26:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How to get 7 epics?
INTJokes · 12 points · Posted at 05:55:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Buy 70 packs
Malverno · 2 points · Posted at 08:39:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This hurts right into my Abominable Bowman. During my initial pack opening of 60ish in KoFT I unpacked 6 of them. Barely any other epics :(
QualityHumor · 1 points · Posted at 16:15:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
6 of my first 8 epics were Gnomeferatu
xtfftc · 1 points · Posted at 16:35:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel like being an epic is the only reason for this card to exist.
HinduHamma · 181 points · Posted at 03:40:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and its for hunter..............
FardHast · 5 points · Posted at 08:26:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
useless hunter epic as usual....
conitation · 1 points · Posted at 16:05:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And It attack.............................
Null_Finger · 5 points · Posted at 04:00:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hey, we should be happy that this is epic so we can save money.
Plague-Lord · 10 points · Posted at 04:34:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
better that cards like this be epic instead of must-craft ones
psymunn · 2 points · Posted at 04:45:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean... if you were to list the 15 worst cards ever printed I would guess 10 would be epics and 3 would be legendary. There's a LOT of trash epics
disregardable2 · 1 points · Posted at 14:46:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah. The neutral 1/1s are mostly the worst. A lot of epics are "bad" but still have the potential to do something in a specific niche.
I concede that the worst card is Millhouse though. Sorry to those that opened him.
9rrfing · 2 points · Posted at 07:40:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Which is a good thing!
ALWAYS_PLANNING_AHEA · 2 points · Posted at 10:02:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Need to dillute the card packs with shitty epics so you can regret your purchase more when you finally open an epic on your 20th pack
Parish87 · 2 points · Posted at 10:19:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can't wait for open this epic 3 times in my 40 packs and get no others.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:56:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Possibly unpopular opinion: Good, this card should be epic, because it's incredibly, incredibly niche.
I just wish that ALL epics were this niche, so I could ignore most of them and just craft the few I'm interested in.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 04:32:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Exactly. Print good cards at common and rare. Put more situational xarss at epic and legendary. Why would you want to have must craft legendaries?
AaroSa · 1 points · Posted at 09:39:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, people get angry when epics are good, but apparently angry also when theyre bad. I’m happy this is an epic instead of some actually good, non-meme cafd.
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Having epics be a combination of meme cards and must-haves is the worst. I think people would mostly be alright if they were all one or the other, probably leaning towards all being meme cards as it makes the game cheaper. But right now, the fact that the same rarity can give absolutely game-breakingly overpowered cards like Psychic Scream OR this garbage is way too much variance for such an insanely rare and expensive card type.
MixesQJ · 1 points · Posted at 10:21:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Most wacky cards are epic, why would this be an exception?
Jakkol · 1 points · Posted at 12:43:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's the only good thing about it.
Dialgak77 · 1 points · Posted at 12:53:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Do you really want to get this instead of a good epic?
Jakkol · 1 points · Posted at 13:18:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Do you really want to craft shoehorned overpowered mandatory epics designed to eat up your dust, instead of rares?
If card rarity should be indicator of their power level then there should be gwent like limits on them.
MrAnd3rs3n · 1 points · Posted at 17:43:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Epic cards being bad is good tho. Since they are the worst ones to craft, you should be happy whenever an epic is bad, since you dont have to craft it and can just dust it whenever you get it.
Hastyscorpion · 1 points · Posted at 19:07:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, if they are making a terrible card you would rather it be an epic right? Hasn't everyone been complaining about must play epics?
Dialgak77 · 1 points · Posted at 19:14:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will complain if I get this instead of unstable evolution.
Khanstant · 57 points · Posted at 03:52:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So what you're saying is I'll get 3 of these.
pneumatic_lance · 4 points · Posted at 05:30:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The Glacial Mysteries for hunter
carrottopguyy · 2 points · Posted at 03:41:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify for Hunter
aaninja64 · 15 points · Posted at 03:52:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Infinitely worse than Purify, too!
backinredd · 6 points · Posted at 04:45:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify actually sees plays
Kirkebyen · 1 points · Posted at 11:33:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's the thing about many bad cards. The meta can shift and can make bad cards good, but this one I really can't see a future for.
pickosicko · 1 points · Posted at 10:26:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Cold take
muglecruzle · 0 points · Posted at 04:14:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Buuut is it the worst?
I'm thinking second from tentacle for arms. Purify sees play
Oktocember · 2 points · Posted at 08:52:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Actually tentacles for arms can be useful in arena sometimes. So this is still worse Edit: not purify, this card. I agree with you on purify
Andrew041180 · 0 points · Posted at 03:53:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Do you have a hot take on how this card might perform in Arena?
The_Homestarmy · 2 points · Posted at 04:07:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well, it's a six mana animal companion.
So basically this should be the push hunter needs to put it at the top of the arena leaderboard.
_sirberus_ · -4 points · Posted at 03:59:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Over time this will find a home IMO. One of my Wild decks is focused on token makers like this as a means to maximize King's Elekk value. Brewing such a deck shows you that this will be possible, but it's not quite there yet. It needs a 2-drop token maker that isn't a secret, a 1-drop discover-a-minion like Rogue and Warrior have, and a payoff high-drop and it'll already be plausible, and after another year of cards it'd be a legit deck.
APRengar · 1688 points · Posted at 03:10:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Haha, great prank.
There's no way Blizz would create something like this.
It'd be weird as hell for Blizz to print a card that punishes having minions for a minion heavy class.
Or having no minions in the deck for a class that has notoriously bad card draw and no sustain to get to the point where they have no minions left in the deck.
That'd just be dumb.
I mean, it's definitely a very realistic looking fake but a fake nonetheless. Definitely. 100%. Without a doubt. Yes.
valakiman · 1443 points · Posted at 03:22:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 1: Denial.
YknowEiPi · 532 points · Posted at 03:38:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is just like Blizzard! Screwing the f2p players with unusable epics every single expansion!
Kosaro · 543 points · Posted at 04:27:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 2: Anger.
MeowGeneral · 460 points · Posted at 04:49:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean. Blizzard could in exchange give hunter a really powerful card like say, an non control hunter tempo card? Please???
Ensaru4 · 483 points · Posted at 04:59:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 3: Bargaining.
TouchFunnyGetDitzy · 438 points · Posted at 05:08:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I need to get drunk(er) right aobut now...
GamEnthusiast · 464 points · Posted at 05:12:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 4: Depression
argentumArbiter · 445 points · Posted at 05:15:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess hunter’s just in the shitter this season, then.
chAceofSpades · 480 points · Posted at 05:17:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 5: Acceptance
SoItBegins_n · 35 points · Posted at 05:49:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
brode_laugh.gif
Yash_We_Can · 23 points · Posted at 08:34:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Bonus Stage: Bliss
LogicSolid · 18 points · Posted at 06:31:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
thanks for the laughs my dudes
Beybladeer · 13 points · Posted at 10:23:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We did it reddit!
Arsustyle · 10 points · Posted at 08:35:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Eh, I never really liked Hearthstone anyway
BattleCatsNub · 6 points · Posted at 22:57:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Step 6: Plot twist
Floripa95 · 6 points · Posted at 15:12:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i love all of you
Keetek · 5 points · Posted at 11:19:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Miniature expansion cycle seen here.
morok_cloudkeeper · 5 points · Posted at 17:08:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That was a ride
GamEnthusiast · 2 points · Posted at 05:29:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When you said shitter this season, I thought you meant winter because MSoG Hunter
LexAenima · 2 points · Posted at 05:17:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stage 5: Acceptance
epicjoebob · 7 points · Posted at 05:03:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Please Blizzard, if you print playable cards for Hunter I'll never drunkenly picket your office yelling about cancer decks again.
UneducatedPerson · 4 points · Posted at 05:06:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard, can rethink your approach on this card? If you do, I promise to pre-order more KaC card packs and give you lots of my wonderful money.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:43:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
AaroSa · 0 points · Posted at 09:41:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So, blizzard screws new player by having unplayable epics, but also somehow with playable epics?
[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 12:41:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Basicly free dust if you unpack that
XhanzomanX · 0 points · Posted at 21:01:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I realize this is part of a joke, but don't people get a lot more pissed when they print auto-include epic cards since they cost a lot to craft?It's a joke, but it logically doesn't make any sense at all.
YknowEiPi · 1 points · Posted at 21:29:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Which is why the polarization of epic cards is so infuriating. You hope for the really good ones, which you need two of, but end up getting this from the packs instead.
And yes. It was a joke.
mofaspombanabalaia · 56 points · Posted at 03:43:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This condition is harder than highlander, for a class that relies heavily on minion, for the most boring effect possible
111AlaN111 · 2 points · Posted at 08:48:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And highlander isnt hard anymore
Shaunymon · 78 points · Posted at 03:20:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If it was a fake Hunter card then wouldn't it actually be good?
[deleted] · 51 points · Posted at 03:46:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fake card makes have figured out that most hunter cards are actually crazy bad so they're getting ahead of the game by making up insanely bad cards
People then believe it because "who would come up with this for fun?"
5D Chutes and Ladders my friend.
leeroyPOfaceless · 26 points · Posted at 03:20:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You underestimate Blizzard's power.
Ameizing_Grace · 19 points · Posted at 03:39:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Don't try it!
TheScaryTerry · 3 points · Posted at 03:41:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I HATE CHU!!!
Ameizing_Grace · 2 points · Posted at 03:50:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
YOU WERE MY BROTHER u/TheScaryTerry!
TheScaryTerry · 2 points · Posted at 04:01:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I loved you!
Ameizing_Grace · 1 points · Posted at 06:53:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Eh, you were ok.
grapeintensity · 2 points · Posted at 03:30:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We can only hope
blueragemage · 3 points · Posted at 03:35:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Don't forget how one of the three options you can randomly get synergizes with other minions
Cloudface_ · 1 points · Posted at 04:23:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the wording is a bit weird, it should say summon an animal companion, if your deck has no minions summon two instead or something
Herahe · 1 points · Posted at 04:34:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The twitter post makes it seem like a joke so we can only pray edit: i am an idiot ignore me wrong twitter account
Plague-Lord · 1 points · Posted at 04:36:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
the only explanation I could see is there's a big card they haven't revealed yet that rewards you for each companion summoned in the game (similar to the Mage legendary)
Kazzack · 1 points · Posted at 04:40:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and of course it's an epic
dnl101 · 1 points · Posted at 10:22:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I seriously thought this was a "hunter is so bad circlejerk fake card".
RektumRanger · 1 points · Posted at 23:31:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is a very beast heavy deck, not minions heavy. It just means you won't be able to run things like bonemare or scalebane. Just strictly beasts only.
Flozzer905 · 243 points · Posted at 03:09:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm so confused, why would they ever print this card? This is unbelievably bad.
backinredd · 124 points · Posted at 04:54:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So that you won’t get good epics when you open your packs.
hoorahforsnakes · 7 points · Posted at 15:25:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It feels like it should read 'summon 2 animal companions, 3 if you have no minions'
Merfen · 2 points · Posted at 18:17:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That is what I was thinking, THAT would make it worthwhile to think up a deck, even if it was trash. This card's upside makes it the same value as 2 animal companions. I swear we must all be reading this wrong or we are missing something. A 6 mana 2 animal companions with no conditions wouldn't even be broken, just very good. 6 mana 2 Leokks isn't exactly going to suddenly turn hunter into a tier 1 deck.
hoorahforsnakes · 1 points · Posted at 18:26:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or even if it was still summon 1 animal companion when you had minions in your deck, but summon 3 if you don't.
It would be super broken to get a 6 mana call of the wild, maybe, but the downside of not playing minions - in a class that revolves entirely around minions - would make it a bit better.
Or hell, even if you made it discover instead of summon. Still wouldn't be great, maybe, but it would at least mean that it isn't a 6 mana animal companion, and rhe ability to discover 2 might be enough to make it at least not terrible
Triggered_Trumpette · 4 points · Posted at 05:30:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the card embodiment of Mike Donais throwing a tantrum that he can't get out of rank 25 due to Hunter.
GameBoy09 · 1936 points · Posted at 03:04:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is complete garbage.
I think this is the worst card shown thus far.
Agram1416 · 781 points · Posted at 04:18:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard logic
3 mana: one companion
6 mana: two companions if you meet deck crippling activator
9 mana: three companions
TheDarkMaster13 · 177 points · Posted at 06:15:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't know if this card would have been run if it was unconditional....
Besuh · 120 points · Posted at 06:37:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It'd probably be pretty good. Animal companion is really good. A good closer for aggro decks and good value for a midrange. Double leokk isn't even that bad.
TheDarkMaster13 · 11 points · Posted at 06:45:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You have to consider that as the mana cost goes up, the value of the effect goes down. Also consider the other options for that turn. You can argent commander, you can sunwalker, you can savannah highmane. Would two animal companions be better than those things? Maybe, but there's an RNG element there. On top of that, there are other options that are cheaper and more reliable if you're after pure damage, or you can go one mana higher for bonemare.
An unconditional version of, 'To my side!' isn't a bad card. It just might be too mediocre to see play.
Besuh · 3 points · Posted at 08:30:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can see a world where it wouldn't see play. But lets not pretend there are that many bad options that RNG plays a huge factor.
Argent Commander - can make better value trades does a guaranteed 4 damage. Getting at least 1 huffer 55% chance with the upside of doing 5 damage 33% and 8 33% of those times.
Sunwalker. I don't see why this would be a good card in hunter.
Savannah - obviously a good value card. Honestly may be one of the best 6 drops in the game. lacks the board impact that to my side has tho.
I honestly think the biggest thing holding this (unconditional) card back is hunter itself. I imagine it in a tempo deck builds a board and finishes with to myside. Similar to how Call of the wild did. Obviously not as consistent but earlier.
elveszett · 1 points · Posted at 15:49:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, it would be good, but not that good as to deserve any downside, let alone an Unlicensed Apothecary-level one.
Besuh · 1 points · Posted at 20:13:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Definitely. The downside seems wayyyy too big and unsynergistic.
DownvoteTheHardTruth · 1 points · Posted at 16:29:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would be pretty good compared to what Hunters are used to. Pretty bad if you compare the value of other classes cards.
phoenixmusicman · 2 points · Posted at 10:14:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If Call of the Wild is run, then this card would be run
Merfen · 2 points · Posted at 18:29:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Guaranteeing all 3 is really more valuable though. You get a guaranteed taunt, charge and damage boost. Depending on if you can get duplicates you may just end up with 2 Leokks when you really needed either a charge or taunt to save yourself from a death the next turn. At 6 mana if you don't get what you needed that could be game over. It wouldn't be bad, but nowhere near as good as CoTW.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:37:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's often 4+ charge damage to the face, as well as putting two decent creatures on the board. That's pretty good.
SjettepetJR · 1 points · Posted at 10:51:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It might have been a good include for Kathrena decks. Not busted, but it would be another body in the midgame.
But how it is now I wonder why it is not 5 mana. Absolutely no minions is a really crippling requirement. I doubt it would even be used in lock 'n load deck, as you want to play multiple spells on the same turn in that deck. It wouldn't even work in a secret deck, as that requires minions to synergize with secrets.
Maybe we will see some 'cast a spell from your deck' things in Hunter. Hunter has multiple cards that work with it, such as animal companion and it's bigger version and all the secrets. It is really not a Hunter theme though.
I think the just designed this as a counter to the dreaded millhouse decks.
OtherJesus · 1 points · Posted at 15:19:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
With no condition it could be ok but it's not anywhere near what Hunter needs.
Hunter needs a mid game minion that demands a little respect and draws one card.
Something like a 5 mana 4/5 beast and draw a card.
Fuck, could even be a god damn legendary for all I care.
mzxrules · 2 points · Posted at 09:14:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
next I bet they'll print 12 mana: four companions.
Cheesebutt69 · 1 points · Posted at 07:38:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THis is one of the most insulting epic cards ever printed. And there are some BAD ones.
aznanimality · 1 points · Posted at 08:16:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh wow I completely misread the card twice.
I thought it was Summon 1 companion, summon 2 more if your deck has no minions for a grand total of 3
Wow this is absolute trash.
Fyrjefe · 1 points · Posted at 14:27:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It used to be 8. Then this sub threw a bitch fest over Hunter during WoG. We have seen the decline for a while. Of course, they will never be moderate on their class balance. "Everyone gets their turn".
Durinder · 1 points · Posted at 23:10:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
reasoning for that logic:
3 mana: sick value and some rng to balance it out
6 mana: sick value and less rng, deck restrictions to balance it out
9 mana: sick value and no rng, high mana cost to balance it out
[deleted] · 1195 points · Posted at 03:14:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
catch22milo · 396 points · Posted at 03:22:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This might be the worst card printed since the two of clubs.
Ardailec · 153 points · Posted at 03:26:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This might actually be worse than One With Nothing.
pspunked · 79 points · Posted at 05:49:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Magic's Best Worst Card https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ndD-QmPJg
only_void · 65 points · Posted at 07:25:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Really cool video, and highlights what's wrong with Hearthstone's design here.
One With Nothing is the sort of card that some players would love in the interest of making it useful, just as the video said. It's unique, it stands alone. It may literally never be useful, it may have its day, but they at least went with a unique effect.
To My Side is just doubling a vanilla card, which is lazy design considering they tripled the same vanilla card last year. Next year we'll see "I Hunt Alone! - 0 mana: Summon no Animal Companions." A year after that they may have to stop waiting till the last second to come up with hunter cards because they've run out of ways to lazily tack on numbers to Animal Companion.
Compare this to Purify which was just a situational card released at a time when Priests desperately needed viable cards to stay afloat. Purify's crime was being gimmicky when they needed value, To My Side is just guilty of "fuck it, tweak a vanilla card" with some "make it worse than last year's version" thrown in to look creative.
Aishi_ · 3 points · Posted at 22:01:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Astral Communion draws a lot of parallels imo
BeeBeedh1 · 2 points · Posted at 13:18:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In before card to summon a zombeast of 2 combined animal companions.
EnriqueWR · 2 points · Posted at 20:32:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know the effect is pretty lame and the usability is questionable at its best, but do you really think this card doesn't make you try some weird stuff?
The top comment at the time I a reading this says something like: "this has a no minion clause in the most minion centered class, this is stupid". But that is exactly what they were pushing here, a non-minion hunter, that's as gimmicky as trying to make "discard your hand" work well.
Can't you see that if this card was actually good enough it could coin a completely new way to play hunter? The only shame here is the HS team playing too safe on it and probably leaving it in the dust because the don't buff stuff.
raphop · 2 points · Posted at 02:16:20 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
But its vastly different than one with nothing, yes both cards require you build the deck around it, however one with nothing has it's potential strength in the weird synergies it's capable of triggering, itself has no upside it's entirely dependent on other cards and their strengths which in turn could allow for some very interesting combos.
To my side though has a gigantic downside for a really meh upside, it doesn't really combo with anything, it's power is entirely on the card text and it's not a good one, it's just there, it doesn't open any doors it's just a very lame effect
EnriqueWR · 1 points · Posted at 02:35:20 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Isn't it the same as building a Reno/Kazakus deck though?
It is a very direct restriction on deck building but I honestly don't think it is bad. Forced deck build restriction is something unique to Hearthstone but I honestly do like it.
But I agree with you that this isn't exactly the same tipe of weirdness, but because these two cards shouldn't be compared in the first place. An example of HS card that aligns itself with what you said about One With Nothing is Treachery(Warlock Donate Minion), so I am still not buying this "MTG design >>>>" issue on this card, and I fucking love MTG, diehard Blue player.
And people keep complaining that the card is extremely weak even if it had no downside but I can still remember people bitching about Call of the Wild before its nerf ("how was this not 9 mana if you are getting 3 times the card??? WTF"). I'm not sold on this card and I think Hunter is still looking like trash, but people shiting on everything about when it is a clear message Blizzard is trying to make Spells-only decks on a game that is fucking bloated with minions everywhere is amazing news to me.
NightKev · 2 points · Posted at 04:21:19 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, Reno et al require you to build your deck in a very different way for an extremely powerful - sometimes game-deciding - unique effect. This card is far less powerful and not at all unique.
EnriqueWR · 1 points · Posted at 04:35:06 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally my first point. If they did make a good effect this restriction could be awesome.
Please, follow the whole conversation, I think I made my point clear. If bot tell me so I can edit my comments.
textfile · 1 points · Posted at 23:16:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
yogg synergy
bardnotbanned · 1 points · Posted at 04:50:14 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Then they should have made it a fucking common, not a rare. Just like this card, if it should have even been released, should not be taking up an epic slot in our card packs.
restlesssheep · 12 points · Posted at 05:59:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Absolutely loved the video. I wish i knew more channels that produced videos like this
rulerguy6 · 187 points · Posted at 03:32:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One With Nothing is definitely better than this. It has some positive synergies at least.
This card doesn't even fit in Yogg-and-load hunter since it kinda needs Yogg.
AnarchySai · 7 points · Posted at 09:25:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just draw yogg turn one then hold that dead card in hand til turn 10, prob solved 😏😏😏
not_the_face_ · 6 points · Posted at 11:16:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, spell hunter, while far from a good deck, is still dependant on the very few minions it does run. Either yogg or y'shaarj can't be cut. Especially not for another huffer.
This card should have been "3 mana, Summon two animal companions, costs (1) more for every minion in your deck"
RoomTemperatur3 · -1 points · Posted at 06:54:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One With Nothing is obviously worse than this. The card obviously isn't good, but a six mana animal companion, while quite poor, isn't strictly useless. One With Nothing has less power and weaker synergies than To My Side. Everyone is getting caught up in hyperbole because Hunter got a bad card.
wugs · 14 points · Posted at 07:22:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"worse" is such a relative term. Like, if I am topdecking late game, yes I clearly want To My Side instead of One With Nothing. But in terms of almost every other part of the card, One With Nothing is superior. They are both "build around" cards, so judging them in a vacuum is pointless. If you want to look at other aspects of cards, One With Nothing is certainly by FAR more interesting. It's also amazingly flavorful. It's a point of discussion.
To My Side is going to just become a meme card and that's about it. It does nothing unique or interesting for the Hunter class other than show that Blizz doesn't know how to give Hunter any other class identity outside of beast minions and like this weird spellslinger idea of Lock and Load.
Instead of raw power level, look at this. Let's say To My Side goes off for you. You pay 6 and get two animal companions. How good do you feel? Now how about you play One With Nothing and it either stops your opponent's win con or enables yours. That's going to feel sweet.
Edit: See this comment for a great video on One With Nothing and how it's an amazing-but-bad card, and how Angel's Mercy is a much, much, much worse card.
Edit 2: Angel’s Mercy, not Angel’s Grace. Damn you white and your very similar names for very very different effects.
RoomTemperatur3 · 3 points · Posted at 07:48:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One With Nothing has been an interesting puzzle for Magic players historically, but the solution to it has always been that the card is just bad. Its flavorful, interesting, and terrible. The card only saw play as suspicious sideboard tech vs Owling Mine and the mystique surrounding it is a result of how weird the card is.
From a design standpoint One With Nothing is certainly more fun to consider and build around, but people are talking about as if it is in anyway stronger than To My Side, which is simply not.
Splatypus · 5 points · Posted at 11:18:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The fact that it saw play makes it better than this, even if it saw very little play. Sure, this is better in limited formats where you can't really build around as much. it's a 6 Mana animal companion, which while terrible, isn't totally useless. But in constructed formats there's really no reason to ever run this. In that case, One With Nothing is better, since there are at least a few cases to run it.
wugs · 1 points · Posted at 19:35:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The solution is that it is bad for now. It could be good in the right meta. It is really really difficult for me to imagine To My Side being a good card. Even if a Hunter did run a spells only deck this isn’t an auto-include which says a lot about its viability.
Zelos · 0 points · Posted at 11:57:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are you seriously arguing that a completely unplayable card is better than a staple in a powerful combo deck?
That's nonsensical. One with nothing isn't powerful; it's awful. It's half of a combo except the other half doesn't exist.
wugs · 2 points · Posted at 19:31:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i definitely typo’d actually. I meant Angel’s Mercy, 4 mana gain 7 life. My bad. I was referring to the card in the One With Nothing video I linked.
TCV2 · 4 points · Posted at 07:22:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The hell are you talking about, there are plenty of "graveyard matters" decks. One With Nothing may only have that one effect, but that is at least usable (with countless of better replacements).
To My Side is just a fucking joke. That card is being printed in what is arguable the biggest "minions matter" class. Nearly every Hunter deck is largely based on minions (sole exception being Yogg n' Load, but even then you're running Yogg). On top of that, this is even worse due to the fact that Hunter has been in the gutter since Gadgetzan at the very least. Handbuff fell flat, Quest Hunter never fully panned out, and DK Hunter just wasn't strong enough.
I don't expect Hunter to ever return to Undertaker-levels of strength. That's just stupid. But at the very least I want for cards like To My Sides to not be printed.
RoomTemperatur3 · 1 points · Posted at 07:51:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not a single reanimator deck has ever played One With Nothing. The card is awful and has never seen actual play. To My Side is another weak hunter card that has become a meme. People are comparing the two as if a weak build around effect is worse than one of the most actively bad cards in Magic history.
Splatypus · 3 points · Posted at 11:19:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe not good reanimator decks. I run it in edh so I can living end because it's a fucking hilarious play.
Sven2774 · 1 points · Posted at 17:31:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One with nothing at least can synergize with dredge decks.
Zellyff · 19 points · Posted at 05:32:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One with nothing is actually really good in specific decks the effect can actually win you the game.
It's worse then the generally considered worst card sorrows path which is so bad it gets handed out as a joke to streamers and after community events on mtgo
Kn0thingIsTerrible · 11 points · Posted at 06:00:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
For anybody unfamiliar with the card, its hearthstone equivalent text would be something like:
1 Mana, Spell: Swap the location of two minions on your opponent’s board. Deal 2 damage to yourself and all friendly minions.
Zellyff · 6 points · Posted at 08:57:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You forgot it would also take away a mana crystal
Kn0thingIsTerrible · 3 points · Posted at 09:13:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It wouldn’t really take away a mana crystal, it’s just that in MTG, the mana crystal equivalents (known as Lands) aren’t automatic, but cards you draw from your deck. And they can have additional text on them, including the option to use them as things other than mana crystals. Since Sorrow’s Path is one of these “Mana Crystal” cards, you can use its ability instead of using it to generate mana. In hearthstone, that would just translate to a 1 mana card, not a card that destroys a mana crystal.
Of course, if you wanted to get really precise, the damage effect also comes into play even when used as mana in MTG. So, I guess it would be more like “Corrupt (1)”.
And Corrupt would be a keyword meaning “Turn your topmost mana crystal black. If you cast a spell using a black mana crystal, deal 2 damage to all friendly characters.”
When it comes to lands, there’s not really any quality hearthstone translations.
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 05:54:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow. Give up a land drop for an effect you need 2 creatures for and you take 2 damage to boot and it's on the table so your opponent knows about it.
Zellyff · 6 points · Posted at 08:57:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yep it's by far the worst card possibly ever in any major card game
Until today
Wonton77 · 2 points · Posted at 10:07:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know fairly little about Magic, but I know enough to realize that is a completely horrible fucking card lol.
Zellyff · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It has a use though and an actual deck it's made it's way in. There are mechanics which benefit from discards or graveyard effects
Wonton77 · 1 points · Posted at 20:01:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know One with Nothing has uses, I meant Sorrow's Path.
Icymagus · 1 points · Posted at 14:06:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Sorrow's Path]] can at least be comboed with [[Vedalken Plotter]] and [[Icy Manipulator]] to nuke your opponent's board every turn.
My vote for worst Magic card? [[Break Open]]. Not only is it uncastable 99% of the time, it also helps the opponent more often than it hurts then even if you do get to cast it!
/u/mtgcardfetcher
MTGCardFetcher · 2 points · Posted at 14:06:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Sorrow's Path - (G) (SF) (MC)
Vedalken Plotter - (G) (SF) (MC)
Icy Manipulator - (G) (SF) (MC)
Break Open - (G) (SF) (MC)
[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call - Summoned remotely!
meman666 · 4 points · Posted at 03:51:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[One with nothing]] was once used as tech against owling mine decks
yokkora · 2 points · Posted at 03:58:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, at least one with nothing was memorable. this will forever be forgotten.
hav0cbl00d · 1 points · Posted at 04:52:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What's that?
Ardailec · 5 points · Posted at 04:58:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Magic the gathering card. You pay 1 Black Mana to discard your entire hand.
It's one of Magic's most infamous cards because no one really knows what you could do with it. There is this convoluted combo you can do to kill yourself with it, but thats about it. It was one of those things that Wizard's printed just because they could and it's kind of lived on in infamy.
plknz · 9 points · Posted at 05:33:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
A card like that totally works in MTG though, because there is that much more depth AND breadth.
Zellyff · 2 points · Posted at 05:33:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean it was thematic in its set that wanted 1 or less card in hand the idea was also to trigger madness or fill your yard.
hajasmarci · 1 points · Posted at 07:17:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It’s set had a strong hand size matters subtheme, which meant that a core set mechanic was having as many cards in your hand as you can.
Zellyff · 1 points · Posted at 08:58:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Some cards in the block cared about having 1 or less cards rats as a tribe did as well as some black apirits
hajasmarci · 1 points · Posted at 12:29:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, the rats in that block played to the theme by reducing the opponents current and maximum handsize thus reducing the effects of their cards. What you think of is Hellbent from the next block, Ravnica, where card effects were amplified if the owner had no cards. Since having no cards in hand doesn’t really win you the game no matter what, the only Hellbent card used was basically Demonfire, an XR spell that dealt X damage to a target and became uncounterable if you were Hellbent. A possible upside that was never really utilized. An other Hellbent card, Infernal Tutor also saw play for its effect with Lion’s Eye Diamond, but neither of those cards were used in conjunction with OwN. The later printed Keldon Megaliths and Gathan Riders saw some play for their possible upsides, but the mechanic itself was never any good.
dragion6 · 1 points · Posted at 10:26:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No it isnt. I see one with nothing as a meme. I mean, mtg is played face to face. And the look on the face of your opponent when you play this card in the middle of the intense, undecided match is priceless "WHAT THE FUCK" "am i missing something?" "wait, he cant be serious.I know for sure he plays to win" "OMG LOL HOW IS THIS A CARD" " he has some plan for this. But what? What should I do?".
When i play to my side card I just say to my opponent: here friend, I have no minions in my deck and playing the worst class in the game. Enjoy your victory. I cant see how does it create an interesting and rememberable situation.
Hell, you cant even use this card for BM because you will never ever win a game without minions. You can play One With Nothing as your last combo piece in some OTK bullshit for extra spice, or play it with a huge board advantage to insult your opponent.
Thetenthdoc · 1 points · Posted at 16:11:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It isn't worse than Wood Elemental though.
yokkora · 4 points · Posted at 03:58:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what are you referencing?
SoupOfTomato · 12 points · Posted at 04:25:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The Two of Clubs is the worst card in a traditional French deck. It is the lowest rank suit, and 2s are almost always low (unlike Aces).
(The other person saying MTG is talking about One With Nothing, which was mentioned one comment later than the one you replied to.)
yokkora · 2 points · Posted at 04:34:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thanks, I was referring to the two of clubs
Ductomaniac · 5 points · Posted at 04:04:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Magic tcg card, 1mana discard your own hand
catch22milo · 2 points · Posted at 05:08:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The two of clubs.
BigSwedenMan · 1 points · Posted at 05:41:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Two of clubs doubles your bombs. It's better than this. . . . . . .binding of Isaac anyone?
[deleted] · 308 points · Posted at 03:44:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Normally I'm a little frustrated with people saying "this is the worst card" since it's just stupid hyperbole.
But this?
What even is this card.
Cainga · 51 points · Posted at 05:38:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe its garbage like many of the freeze shaman cards that eventually find their usefulness in a specific tavern brawl you get to play once every 6 months.
Forkyou · 6 points · Posted at 09:15:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The freeze shaman cards are pretty bad but most at least do something roughly worth the mana they cost but the thing they do is just bad or too niche.
But with this one? If you do it without meeting the criteria its literally the same as an already in that class existing cards but with TWICE the mana cost. And if you meet the criteria, which is arguable more limiting and crippling than "one of" you get a card that is maybe 1 more mana efficient than what it would normally cost, if even
dragion6 · 1 points · Posted at 10:07:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, you can win a rank 20 game with freeze shaman. I actually got a winstreak with it one day, up to two ranks.
And there is no way you can win with a deck without minions, not even on mage. Like, maybe you'll get like 4% winrate with afk/disconnects/dayli quest matches, but no way it wins against any one who plays the game with an intention to win, no matter whats their deck or skill is.
sex_tourism · 4 points · Posted at 07:10:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nobody knows what it is but it's provocative.
DrQuint · 1 points · Posted at 10:16:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's not even good on Yogg N Load anymore because that deck is now gone with the Yogg battlecry nerf.
And Yogg N Load runs 2 minions (Yogg+Ellek) so it was never even a good card to begin with.
No really, think about it: The singular Hunter meme deck that runs almost no minions wouldn't ever run this card that activates on no minions.
[deleted] · 47 points · Posted at 03:20:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
AggnogPOE · 7 points · Posted at 05:17:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Whats going stale is the designers' imagination.
muglecruzle · 28 points · Posted at 03:33:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah, I think a 6 mana 4/2 charge is better than a 5 mana 2/2 weapon.
TurnOneYeti · 44 points · Posted at 04:02:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not when there is already a class card thats a 3 mana 4/2 Charge ... that is not an epic ... and is from the basic set that all players start out with for free.
psymunn · 7 points · Posted at 04:40:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And there's already a 4 mana 3/3 that gives you a free 2/2 weapon
muglecruzle · -2 points · Posted at 04:07:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Were looking for the worst cards, not the best cards. I'd rather use this card than tentacles for arms
MiniTom_ · 8 points · Posted at 07:12:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So, the problem is there's 2 different discussions going on. Its definitely possible you'd rather have a 6 mana animal companion then tentacle for arms, but as a stand alone card, this is way more insulting then TFA.
At least tentacle for arms has like a unique interesting idea, however poorly executed, of being a weapon that never goes away. This, at best, is as if you played 2 animal companions in 1 card. If you have the most deck disrupting condition printed so far. If you sabatoge your own deck, you get a mediocre benefit.
I guess the difference is that TFA is a worse card as far as playability, but I definitely think this is a worse card as far as design. It doesn't even fit with the set which is confusing as hell, its a Rexxar quote, and while rangers/druids exist in DnD and have pets, there's nothing so far as I know that this is a specific reference to. It feels like they gave hunter a good card, that ended up being too good, and this was some generic standby card that they swapped to at the 11th hour.
AudioSly · 3 points · Posted at 04:25:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But Tentacles trades favourably and leaves you with a 2/1 weapon, only costs you 1/20th of your life total too.
[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 03:28:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's definitely not THE worst but it's pretty close to be the worst
shadowstorm100006 · 5 points · Posted at 03:38:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What's worse in your opinion? Personally, I think Recycle from GvG is worse.
Homicidal_HotS · 41 points · Posted at 03:48:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Recycle is removal for a class with no removal. This is twice the cost of animal companion with a really difficult to fulfill condition
shadowstorm100006 · 6 points · Posted at 03:54:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good point. In that case... I honestly can't think of a worse card than this.
socopithy · 33 points · Posted at 04:00:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Two of these.
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 04:19:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
TWO giant paint bubbles
Delekii · 14 points · Posted at 04:21:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There is no way that a hard removal is worse than this. Furthermore, as deathrattles become stronger, so does recycle. It still probably wouldn't be put in decks probably, but it could be right now.
psymunn · 5 points · Posted at 04:41:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Recycle is bad but under rated. It's far from the worst card and a reasonable arena pick
MiniTom_ · 1 points · Posted at 07:15:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Someone brought up Tentacle for Arms, which I do agree. I think I'd rather stick this in a deck as a 6 mana single animal companion, then play TFA, but I do think this is a far worse designed card. At least TFA is almost an interesting concept, this is just insultingly boring, terrible, and deck disrupting.
TrippyTriangle · 1 points · Posted at 05:00:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Magma Rager is considered one of the worst, if not the worst. Am'gam rager is down there too. Flame Leviathan is on this level of bad.
AggnogPOE · 8 points · Posted at 05:18:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Id rather pay 3 for a 5/1 than 6 for a 2/4
shadowstorm100006 · 1 points · Posted at 05:28:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what about 9 for a 2/4 Dragon Recruiter ;-).
Lemon_Dungeon · -1 points · Posted at 05:05:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify was terrible when it came out.
MiniTom_ · 3 points · Posted at 07:14:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At its core, a lot of time, its 2 mana draw a card. That's honestly better then this. In addition to the fact that silence priest actually did moderately well.
Lemon_Dungeon · 1 points · Posted at 07:33:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's a conditional 2 mana draw a card + make your creature worse most of the time. It was only after another set came out that silence priest actually became decent.
MiniTom_ · 2 points · Posted at 08:28:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
While I don't think it makes your creatures worse most of the time, as battlecry minions are incredibly prevalent (especially since if you're playing it you're probably making minions better), conditional 2 mana cycle is honestly still better then destroying your deck for combining 2 animal companions into one card, or playing a 6 mana animal companion.
I agree they're both weak cards, but I'd take a purify release any day of the week over this uninspired, unplayable, unmemeable, thing we got.
luizjaq · 3 points · Posted at 03:35:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
seriously, what in the fuck
lantranar · 4 points · Posted at 03:41:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and here I thought purify would always be the worst card ever printed in HS history. I have never been more wrong.
dougtulane · 13 points · Posted at 03:53:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify was in a tier 2 deck. This will never be in a tier deck.
lantranar · 3 points · Posted at 04:15:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
individually purify is still a bad card. It got somewhat a bit decent simply because Blizzard's policy to print a 'card A that is strong thanks to another card B which is garbage' 4 months later.
I wont be surprise if they release another stupid card that say "gain huge ass value if you play To my side this/last turn" or some spells of the same theme.
brianbezn · 1 points · Posted at 06:24:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No it is not, but it is definitely bad.
SerellRosalia · 1 points · Posted at 10:12:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, you guys just don't get it! This card is so overpowered, Blizzard had to make sure to give Priest a single spell to shut down the entire archetype!
TweedleNeue · 1 points · Posted at 17:03:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even if it were 5 Mana I'd find it interesting, I'd be like "Hey maybe 5 years into the future in wild this could be an interesting deck" but this? I just don't see the point? Unless Hunter gets like a "Double the effect of your spells if you have no minions in your deck" or "if you have no minions in your deck your beasts have +?/+?" as an aura effect. But alas cards literally never get buffed so it's garbage and I'll open one and consider why I play.
handlesscombo · 1 points · Posted at 03:29:07 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
at least purify was a common
masamunexs · 0 points · Posted at 03:36:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dragonhatcher would like a word for K&C's worst card. Cobrastrike says hi on behalf of hunters.
Reiker0 · 5 points · Posted at 04:17:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dragonhatcher at least has potential in decks like big priest although it probably isn't good enough.
This card has no potential. Hunters don't even have enough non-minion-dependent spells to make the deck to use this card, even if it was good (it's not).
ronindog · 0 points · Posted at 04:20:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What about toxic arrow
metzger411 · 1 points · Posted at 07:20:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Toxic arrow is a decent card in a control deck. It actually sees play in wild along with unstable ghoul.
ellipsoid314 · -2 points · Posted at 04:24:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify.
Exorrt · 248 points · Posted at 03:16:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You fail to see the Genius of Team 5
You see, this is obviously a card for all the people who haven't beaten the Lich King with Hunter yet. Good Guy Blizzard just wants everyone to have Arthas and you guys are giving them shit
[deleted] · 56 points · Posted at 03:58:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Would Hunter actually look to play 0 minions against Arthas?
Would this be a good turn 6 play against Arthas?
iSoveit · 72 points · Posted at 04:08:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
no, and no lmao
akmvb21 · 4 points · Posted at 04:10:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is animal companion a good play on turn 3? Almost always. Is call of the wild a good turn 9 play? Yeah usually (if you have it). Seems like this card would be good if you always got two, but not better than highmane which makes it an awkward include since hunter wants to play fast decks and you only have so much space for 5+ drops. What’s awkward is the deck restriction part for no reason.
Plague-Lord · 4 points · Posted at 04:46:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
inb4 they print another card to justify this.. "Giga-Huffer: 0/2 Charge, gains +3 attack for each Animal Companion you summoned this game"
Kasurin_Makise · 11 points · Posted at 03:28:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is going above and beyond Ticking Abomination levels of bad
ganpachi · 9 points · Posted at 04:00:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
TA is an all star in the tavern brawl this week.
Axle-f · 2 points · Posted at 06:10:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Except that card is situationally playable in arena.
TrippyTriangle · 2 points · Posted at 04:56:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
this is one of the worst in the entire game to be honest. Magma rager level.
BigMan1844 · 2 points · Posted at 05:41:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This may be worst card ever printed.
Bobik8 · 4 points · Posted at 03:07:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Worse than Dragonhatcher?
pianobadger · 46 points · Posted at 03:09:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Actually yes.
_edge_case · 14 points · Posted at 03:14:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I didn't think there was any possibility we'd see an Epic that was worse than Dragoncatcher. I was so wrong.
Adalimumab8 · 3 points · Posted at 03:42:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Btw that card has a great chance of being a 1 if in big priest. Someone crunched the numbers and it’s really effective at increasing your Barnes (25% to almost 50% of a big body), essentially acting as another resurrect since you get a big body on 4 and not just a target to resurrect. At least will be experimented with
GameBoy09 · 34 points · Posted at 03:09:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes. Dragonhatcher has the small chance to snowball and pull more Dragons.
This is just a 6 mana Animal Companion, it's complete trash.
SuperRayman001 · 13 points · Posted at 03:09:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, Dragonhatcher has at least some meme potential in Big Priest. The fact that Y'Shaarj is better doesn't matter if you run both.
This here? Running no minions to get the reward of getting something that isn't even worth more than you are paying? Just worthless.
HCN_Mist · 1 points · Posted at 06:51:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe you are supposed to recruit all your minions and then this is OP?
Zoltarr777 · 7 points · Posted at 03:09:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Easily, at least that can pull something and has a chance to live, this is just so horrible.
Raktoner · 18 points · Posted at 03:09:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a 6 mana animal companion. Yes it's worse.
DanTheLadiesManV2 · 4 points · Posted at 03:13:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yea it's a 6 mana animal companion. What other line of text do you mean? I don't see anything
frostedWarlock · 12 points · Posted at 03:18:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
A Hunter deck without minions in it is basically a Hunter deck without cards in it. The only exception would be Yogg-n-Load Hunter except this card is bad if you haven't drawn your Yogg yet or any other minions you might run in such a deck. The archetype currently pushed for Hunter this expansion also requires you to have minions in your deck so who exactly is Blizzard expecting to run this card?
dougtulane · 7 points · Posted at 03:55:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, I think so.
Here’s an experiment. Try to make the best all-spells “to my side” hunter deck you can. It’s probably not going to be very good.
Then see if replacing to my side with Savannah highland is better. 9/10 times, I think it is.
UberEinstein99 · 5 points · Posted at 03:20:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The thing about Dragonhatcher is that I can at least see why the printed the card, and what combo it might be supposed to create. Heck, if a good aura-effect or deathrattle dragon even gets printed, I can totally see Dragonhatcher seeing play.
But To my side! is so bad that no matter what other cards the print, or unless they print absolutey broken cards that synergize with this, I can’t wver see this seeing play. Idk what it was designed for, what kind of deck it could possibly go in... It’s not even a fun meme card.
Moshiyitsu · 3 points · Posted at 03:15:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, like, at least when dragon catchers effect goes off you get something good on the board. With this you have build your entire deck around it for it to be anything other than paying twice as much for animal companion and even when you get 2 of them it's still not worth it. This card probly wouldn't be very good even if the effect wasn't conditional, or if it was a mana less. It's probly one of the worst cards in the game.
Keetek · 2 points · Posted at 03:17:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes, Dragonhatcher has potential in a deck with only BIG dragons.
This? I don't see any viability whatsoever.
PushEmma · 1 points · Posted at 03:09:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Same level?
Lu__ma · 1 points · Posted at 04:01:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I... I think it's designed as a high roll in barnes y'shaarj hunter??? That's about all it can do. Honestly I hope Pure Spell Hunter gets some more support, it's bloody funny.
Willblinkformoney · 1 points · Posted at 04:10:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe they wanted to keep the strong cards for hunter mostly in the common and rare slot. No hunter commons have been revealed yet..right blizzard?
RabbitOHare · 1 points · Posted at 04:13:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even if you manage to make a no-minion deck, Psychic Scream hilariously counters this.
thebaron420 · 1 points · Posted at 04:19:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and of course it's a hunter card
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 05:17:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is possibly the worst card ever printed. Like for real, name me a card that's worse than this one lol.
Why do they do this? They print beyond bottom tier cards for classes that are already bad...like when they have priest Purify.
quickjoey71733 · 1 points · Posted at 06:24:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
this may well be the worst card ever printed in any card game ever. It may as well say "go fuck yourself for playing hunter."
GetEquipped · 1 points · Posted at 06:50:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm just gonna say, remember when the Blood Princes (the lego 2, 3, 4,) were announced and everyone called them dog shit and now they're meta.
I mean, THIS card is dog shit, I just wanted to bring that up because the Blood Council was one of my favorite fights in ICC.
TombSv · 1 points · Posted at 09:37:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The hunter cards feels very disjointed.
dnl101 · 1 points · Posted at 10:21:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hmm. I think Rin and Runespear could compete for #1.
Caelcryos · 1 points · Posted at 20:14:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What do you mean? This card is a straight buff to Yogg!
[deleted] · 492 points · Posted at 03:05:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I have to admit I'm not sure how this was printed. I can't ever think of a time this card would be viable. Like ever.
PM_OUTDATED_MEMES · 154 points · Posted at 03:24:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In wild Yogg-n-Load after drawing your Yogg, obviously! /s
psymunn · 32 points · Posted at 04:46:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What about your king's elekk?
PM_OUTDATED_MEMES · 72 points · Posted at 04:47:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Garbage card, takes up space you could otherwise play To My Side. Cut it.
mszegedy · 1 points · Posted at 06:45:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In all seriousness, don't you run Stitched Tracker over King's Elekk anyway? Poorer statline, but you get to choose whether you want Thaurissan or Yogg, and the original card stays in your deck (which is normally a bad thing, except because you're Control Hunter, they're the two best cards in your deck).
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:22:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stitched Tracker came out after Yogg n Load as a deck was butchered.
PM_OUTDATED_MEMES · 1 points · Posted at 06:48:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I haven't run yogg and load since the start of kft but that sounds reasonable, though I'd also never run Thaurissan in that deck.
mszegedy · 2 points · Posted at 06:50:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thaurissan was in the WotOG version because it discounted your cards to make for a more effective LnL turn. What changed?
PM_OUTDATED_MEMES · 2 points · Posted at 06:51:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Probably just my version because i never net decked it, just jammed yogg and 29 spells because let's be real, it's a deck for memes, not climbing ladder.
mszegedy · 2 points · Posted at 06:56:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fair enough. Some guy on reddit got high legend with it and wrote a guide, though, so it was slightly more than just a meme deck.
username1012357654 · 1 points · Posted at 14:07:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The version I played had 2 elekks, Harrison Jones, Thaurisan, and Yogg
RabbitOHare · 14 points · Posted at 04:17:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It’s way OP, friend. It’s just a good thing they gave Priest Psychic Scream to counter this.
AudioSly · 2 points · Posted at 04:35:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can just imagine some poor sod at rank 20 dicking around trying to make their minion-less Hunter deck work.
They curve out perfectly into this... and some smug ass priest shuffles them into their deck.
madog1418 · 2 points · Posted at 07:00:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Holy shit, then the next one won’t even work because of the shuffled companions!!
JoukoAhtisaari · 7 points · Posted at 04:12:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly? Blizz probably looked at idiots like me who occasionally make no minion hunter decks and said "lets make a card for that... special individual".
AudioSly · 2 points · Posted at 04:32:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're being far too generous on yourself.
Renantjbr · 1 points · Posted at 04:43:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I get you
SubscriptNine · 3 points · Posted at 03:26:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They could easily print more cards to make this viable. Some overpowered cards with the "if your deck has no minions" tag would make this great as you need spells to fill out your deck
Death_After_Life · 12 points · Posted at 03:30:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In theory, sure. Maybe a class like mage could pull it off. But hunter? They don’t have the tools to control an entire game without minions. Most classes don’t. And even the ones that do would be a really bad deck.
[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 03:46:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Start Running]]
1 mana Hunter Spell common
If your deck has no minions, discover and summon a beast worth <6 mana (repeatable this turn).
I think a card like this could make the archetype viable.
thegooblop · 0 points · Posted at 04:03:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To be fair Hunter is the "spells that summon minions" class. The deck would suck, but it's possible to make 30 card decks without minions that can still get minions on the board.
Death_After_Life · 2 points · Posted at 04:11:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And I can see the idea. Between the DK, animal companion, Call of the Wild and unleash the hounds i can see how getting minions on board is possible. But why would you ever take out all minions to run a card that doesn’t provide a huge impact? Most cards that require a specific deck type give a huge payoff. (Kazakus, Reno, quests, etc.)
thegooblop · -1 points · Posted at 04:14:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think people are going to give me hate for this... but there is a good reason why the card exists. People have already been making meme decks of "I hunt alone" hunter, this card is merely an official acknowledgement of that meme archetype.
This really isn't the expansion that Hunter needed this sort of "joke card", given Hunter's state, but as a card this does fit into some meme decks people use, and in fact even encourages those meme decks with a special little nod. This card reminds me of "Purify", where everybody hates on it because it's a terrible meme archetype... but if No-Minions Hunter ever gets the same sort of boosts that Silence Priest got within the last year, people might not be laughing so much.
ganpachi · 4 points · Posted at 04:04:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You would think they would start that archetype with a powerful card. You know, like Reno.
This is a wet fart.
thegooblop · 3 points · Posted at 04:02:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I disagree completely, if Call of the Wild can't see play at 9 mana with no RNG, I very much doubt this RNG-card with a worse effect will see play.
The very concept of "if your deck has no minions" decks can never work well without being insanely busted. There is no support for that in the Classic set, which means they would need to devote a full set to cards that promote the effect for it to work. Even then, as long as minions like Weasel Tunneler exist where you can put a minion into the opponent's deck, the decks will never be good with cards like this. A 6 mana animal companion would be cripplingly bad, and if any actually good deck was full of these "no minion deck" cards then you can be sure cards like Weasel Tunneler would be used as a counter because there's no way to stop something like that unless Blizzard plans on adding a spell that specifically makes it impossible for minions to enter your deck, which I doubt people would play.
I also doubt 6 mana for 2 would see much play even WITHOUT it's condition because Hunter already has Highmane, one of the best 6-drops ever printed, in the Classic set. Highmane doesn't have a condition, but it's just plain better than this without RNG.
[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 03:48:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Start Running]]
1 mana Hunter Spell common
If your deck has no minions, discover and summon a beast worth <6 mana (repeatable this turn).
I think a card like this could make the archetype viable.
sir151 · 1 points · Posted at 04:18:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm guessing the legendary weapon might be crazy like "recruit every minion in your deck." This could work with recruit as it thins out your deck and maybe Hunter gets some insane weapons/spells that summon minions. But yeah, you kinda need minions to win in HS.
jmcgit · 1 points · Posted at 05:00:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Its not bad in that Summoners Tavern Brawl, which summons a minion of the same cost as any spell you cast. It’s so bad everywhere else that I can only assume they printed it just for that brawl.
Hoffislav · 1 points · Posted at 05:04:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
OP, any reason why the name of the linked image is named memescard.png? :thinking:
wizards_only · 1 points · Posted at 05:54:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Secret tech against Fatigue Warrior
nightbass · 1 points · Posted at 07:17:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They don't f print anything. They can literally change the card anytime they want. Don't pretend that once they showed this piece of garbage card they can't alter it.
DrQuint · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is viable on the fight against The Lich King.
... That's it.
solus-esse-nolo · 1 points · Posted at 11:49:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's to complete the Lich King adventure.
TriforceofCake · 0 points · Posted at 03:43:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Secret hunter...?
cndman · 1226 points · Posted at 03:08:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this might literally be the worst card ever printed. It's like insultingly bad.
Edit: On top of the fact that this card is obviously really really horrible for no particular reason, it is also not fun to play at all. It is not silly, it has no meme potential. Even if you build a whole deck around this card to satisfy its absurd condition, it's at best an average card that's boring as fuck to play.
jgomez315 · 450 points · Posted at 03:37:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah man, if you play big hunter, you dont want to have your abominababbale snowmen rez a 2/2 token off of highmane. so if you dont run highmane, you need another 6 drop.
i think what a lot of people are missing about this card, and what ultimately gives it incredible value, isnt the relatively easy condition to satisfy to get two animal companions. The value in this card lies in it curving perfectly into the concede button. Just drop bad boy here on the board, summon a huffer, or even a leokk. then bottom right straight back to the next worthy opponent.
its 5d chess, you gotta understand
[deleted] · 305 points · Posted at 03:45:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I love this so much.
metsfan1025 · 37 points · Posted at 04:05:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It might depend on the meta but in my opinion this deck won't survive long enough to concede.
AggnogPOE · 3 points · Posted at 05:20:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know for sure id feel pride and accomplishment out of that perfect curve play.
Strongman518 · 2 points · Posted at 05:03:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
/r/unexpected
SugarDaddeh · 2 points · Posted at 08:12:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You are a genius. I'm going to use the phrase next time garbage like this is revealed.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 09:50:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I fucking died HAHAHA
PsychicWarElephant · 1 points · Posted at 16:38:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The way you made it sound like you were serious up until the fucking gold level swerve was hilarious. well fucking played.
Quazifuji · 72 points · Posted at 04:15:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the biggest issue I have with it. I'm all for silly "build-around-me" Johnny cards that will never see competitive play, but for those kinds of cards to work they need to actually do something cool when you manage to pull it off. With this, your grand prize for building a hunter deck with no minions is... a card that's exactly half way in between Animal Companion and Call of the Wild?
This would barely be overpowered without the completely extreme deckbuilding restriction, and the reward is too small even if you do manage the condition.
skysinsane · 1 points · Posted at 01:30:39 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
This isn't a "build around me" card.
This is a card for a deck that is already built around having no minions. This card needs cards with the same limitation that are far more OP, but if that happens it will be entirely viable.
Purify is a terrible card. However, if you already have the tools necessary to build a silence priest deck, purify has reasonably good value, and more importantly adds consistency to your deck.
Quazifuji · 1 points · Posted at 01:38:41 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
But that's kind of my point. Its restriction says "build around me" but its effect say "decent value/tempo card."
Sure, other cards with the same restriction could be added, and then you're building around that group of cards instead of building around one. But still, that restriction is directly telling you to keep this card in mind when making your deck.
Purify is a "build around me" card. It's not the only card silence priest is built around, but it's a core component of it and silence priest might not exist if purify didn't.
skysinsane · 1 points · Posted at 03:05:09 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Silence priest would have slightly less consistency without purify. A "no minions" hunter deck will have slightly more consistency with to my side.
politicalanalysis · 1 points · Posted at 14:31:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This might see play without the condition. I’m not even sure it would see play, but it might. With the condition, make it 4 mana. It would be a fun inclusion in the Barnes y’saraj deck, not a great deck, but it might be better with this at 4 mana.
grapeintensity · 102 points · Posted at 03:38:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I am disappointed that a fellow human being, someone the same species as you and me, thought that this card was worth printing. What the actual fuck.
TeamAquaGrunt · 40 points · Posted at 05:24:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
not just a human being, many human beings. every single person on the design team saw this card, thought "yeah y'know what this is perfectly fine, add it to the set". i honestly just want them to HoF every single basic and classic hunter card so we can start getting real cards and not literal dust.
SerellRosalia · 6 points · Posted at 10:15:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
johnlavolpe · 27 points · Posted at 03:41:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think it would be interesting at 4 mana. Or having it cost 1 if you have no minions (sure one mana huffer but that’s the only minion hunter would have other than like 3 more huffers) Not so bad but amazing if you trigger it. Don’t get me wrong the drawback would probably still be too big, but at least there would be some real reward to it
Khanstant · -8 points · Posted at 03:53:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this card would be bad if it costed 0 and played itself at the start of the match.
jbsnicket · 5 points · Posted at 04:19:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That’s just animal companion for free that doesn’t cost a card. Animal companion is good.
Khanstant · -7 points · Posted at 04:32:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Sure, but you play Animal Companion in a regular deck with minions. Still, free starting companion would actually be acceptable.
[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 05:09:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
lol free starting companion would be broken. This is the classic over the top circlejerk. "Oh if this card was literally the best card ever it would still be shit because everyone else says it's bad".
jeoseo · 3 points · Posted at 06:02:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think he meant a free companion IF you have no minions in your deck.
Khanstant · 0 points · Posted at 06:52:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
My original post was hyperbolic, totally.
ohenry78 · 7 points · Posted at 04:06:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's an Epic you don't have to ever craft. Just think about it like that.
Kn0thingIsTerrible · 10 points · Posted at 06:16:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will open six of these and no other epics this expansion, you mean.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 03:50:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
jaycshah99 · 4 points · Posted at 04:03:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
even then you atleast had some minions in hunter lich king fight because your best bet of beating him was barnes>y'sharrj>something big like Gazrilla or hyena fledgling insanity. NO minons at all makes it actually harder.
LechHJ · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2x Molten Giants and 15-16 minions in the deck. Concede until you get both giants on the board turn 1. Ez.
HawSawGee · 1 points · Posted at 04:28:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I could see an effect like this being cool if it wasn't so horrible, lower cost or add a body
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 05:14:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah this goes in yogg and load maybe and that deck is crazy fun.
Pikmints · 1 points · Posted at 08:35:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I could see a meme deck running 2 Animal Companions, 2 To My Side!s, and 2 Call of the Wilds. That said, there's a damn good reason it'd be a meme deck, because it'd sit right next to freeze Shaman decks.
DrQuint · 1 points · Posted at 10:19:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It should be 4 mana and even then... What for?
SideofClouds · 1 points · Posted at 12:19:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But, but ... what about the ragers? D:
[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 04:08:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Calling it now, hunter will get the support cards for new archetypes in 2018 and suddenly this card fits in.
Gatekeeper1310 · 546 points · Posted at 03:04:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man, these Hunter cards are really shit this expansion. We've ascended beyond memes and now I just feel bad for Rexxar.
HinduHamma · 119 points · Posted at 03:46:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
dead serious - i think team 5 spends the least amount of time on hunters design philosophy, and by that i mean, they just literally think about it on the toilet while they are on a shit break. then they get back to real work on the real classes
GromScream-HellMash · 44 points · Posted at 04:18:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're being far too kind. I get some good thinking in while on the toilet and taking a shit.
Probably meant they think about hunter design philosophy while wiping their ass after a shit break. It's a delicate balance then and most likely to fuck up one way (hunter design) or another (a messy wipe)
zzxyyzx · 9 points · Posted at 04:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Team 5 probably thinks Hunter was a mistake. They already admitted Hunter was "too strong at the lower ranks", i.e. "new players don't know how to make decks that don't lose to aggro so we must punish the class whose hero power is just aggro."
terminbee · 7 points · Posted at 08:29:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, if they didn't try, they'd give us some random vanilla minion. Another variation of the 3/2 for 2 mana slot. This is actively trying to shit on Hunter. They didn't release a mediocre card, this is an actively detrimental card to put in your deck.
roit_ · 1 points · Posted at 08:46:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reminds me of a joke about red in MtG.
"Wanna know how to design a red mechanic? Take another color's mechanic and make it dogshit. Bam, red mechanic."
Red always seems to get worse versions of other colors' mechanics. It has impulse instead of card draw, rummaging instead of looting, damage to creatures instead of outright destruction or exile, +X/+0 instead of +X/+X, and so on.
I wonder if that's how team 5 thinks about Hunter.
blackjack419 · 156 points · Posted at 03:34:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And the worst part - when you concede as hunter, you're forced to say "Well Played."
soursurfer · 248 points · Posted at 04:12:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Uh, it's "Well Fought." We got an impostor Rexxar main here, guys.
blackjack419 · 24 points · Posted at 04:15:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Because I never concede. I BM TO THE END!!!
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 5 points · Posted at 05:57:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Every pro Rexxar knows you instantly cut it off with a "Thanks".
Posers, sheesh!
XFactorNova · 2 points · Posted at 03:32:36 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Every Pro PRO Rexxar knows you play Taunt, Heal, Clear Rexxar and waste 20 minutes of someones life. #SoMuchWinning
jaycshah99 · 69 points · Posted at 04:15:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
*Well Fought
Which is why blizzard's next hunter epic spell will be:
Suicidal Shot: 10 mana, spam 5 Threaten Emotes, 5 wow emotes, 5, thanks emotes, 5 sorry emotes, 5 oops emotes automatically even if your opponent squelched you, and then deal 30 damage to your own hero.
That way the they don't have to say well fought to get on to our next game. THINK OF THE VALUE!
ElectricCarrot · 13 points · Posted at 04:43:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Except a 10 mana card in Hunter would never get played. They should make it 0 mana and have it start in your hand like quests. This way, they spare you the pain of playing Hunter for more than one turn.
jaycshah99 · 6 points · Posted at 04:54:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Exactly, we don't want hunters to be oppressive and subject there opponents to a emote spam, that would not be fair to new players.
dragion6 · 1 points · Posted at 10:29:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The yogg synergy though.
blackjack419 · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The best part is they have to see all the emotes for like a minute.
IT"S INSANE VALUE!!!
KatzOfficial · 1 points · Posted at 04:36:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's why you buy Alleria, her concede is the most sarcastic one in the game.
I wouldn't recommend it though, Hunter may never recover from this Crushing blow.
Mordin___Solus · 2 points · Posted at 04:15:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I absolutely hate hunters and I'm starting to feel bad for them. Is this karma for huntertaker?
caketality · 1 points · Posted at 04:20:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I actually feel like most of the Hunter cards have been interesting, even if we’ve still had to wonder how it’s supposed to support all of the expensive cards being printed. This card though... I just can’t see it, in any world. This is the first card revealed that just looks dead on arrival for me.
Laih0ard · 1 points · Posted at 06:59:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What about Alleria?
CrazyFredy · 1 points · Posted at 07:40:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well, at least we can be sure that hunter is the next shaman/priest. This is comparable to Purify, except a lot worse. But like they printed shit for priest when they were in a bad place, they are doing the same for hunter now and this phase is followed by the overbuff-phase.
Zireall · 1 points · Posted at 17:40:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
cant wait for hunter to be Shaman tier op the next expansion.
amasimar · 1 points · Posted at 19:07:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just revert CotW so Hunter doesn't get 0.1% playrate with negative WR thanks
[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 04:18:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter has been straight busted too man times for me to feel even slightly bad for rexxar. I was there for undertaker coin leper gnome and buzzard unleash.
Kn0thingIsTerrible · 1 points · Posted at 07:13:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Every single one of those cards, except for the coin I guess, has been nerfed!
LegendarySketches · 0 points · Posted at 16:16:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And then we'll all complain about the unplayability of Hunter, and Blizzard will give them the same treatment they gave Shamans and Priests.
Keetek · 336 points · Posted at 03:03:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This seems genuinely horrible.
EDIT: I don't even like hunters and I don't think they deserve a card this bad.
Keetek · 125 points · Posted at 03:09:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, this may just be the worst card of the expansion.
cndman · 260 points · Posted at 03:12:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This may be the worst card of all time. Its really bad, it has no fun or meme potential. Even when you get it to go off in the most optimal scenario its not even exciting or good.
Keetek · 42 points · Posted at 03:13:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I agree. I am absolutely puzzled how this was even printed.
XFactorNova · 1 points · Posted at 03:33:15 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
SwashburglarCounterplay
woodchips24 · 3 points · Posted at 08:07:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
First toxic arrow and now this. Someone at blizzard really hates hunter
jbsnicket · 1 points · Posted at 04:21:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tentacles for arms is worse than this.
Millillion · 12 points · Posted at 05:59:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tentacles has more potential than this. Tentacles has at least an inkling of potential in super hard control warrior decks that spend most turns just hero powering and passing.
TeamAquaGrunt · 10 points · Posted at 05:33:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
at the very least i can throw tentacles for arms in when im doing the weapon quest. the fuck do i do with this?
Sidereel · 4 points · Posted at 05:10:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Eh, you could still throw it in a deck. This though is absurd.
terminbee · 3 points · Posted at 08:37:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You can play Tentacles for Arms with no condition. You don't have to actively hurt your deck to play TfA. This is a fucking 6 mana "Animal Companion."
terminbee · 0 points · Posted at 08:38:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm secretly hoping that in about a month or two, someone makes some crazy ass Hunter deck and this card turns out to be OP as fuck. Then Blizzard comes around and we all eat crow.
Au_Struck_Geologist · 0 points · Posted at 04:05:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe that spider card that can only attack if your hero did, but at least that one they printed at rare. This is astonishingly bad. This is riotously bad.
cndman · 10 points · Posted at 04:07:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
thats a draftable card for rogue in arena.
Cliff86 · 2 points · Posted at 04:37:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's even an above average card for rogue in arena
amasimar · 1 points · Posted at 19:04:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Was used earlier in some tempo Rogue/Warrior decks.
Also good in arena for Rogue/Warrior
KamikazePlatypus · 20 points · Posted at 03:14:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Possibly any expansion.
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 04:17:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When was the last time we got a card that's twice as bad as a Basic card in nearly any realistic scenario and impossible to build a functional deck around? I think this really is a serious contender for worst card in the game.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:24:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card would barely be playable if it was no minions in your hand or your hand is empty. This is just... what?
[deleted] · 120 points · Posted at 03:08:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
DrQuint · 12 points · Posted at 10:27:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Making you excited for Artifact and the new Magic game.
InCactusMaximus · 2 points · Posted at 21:25:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wish I could be excited about Artifact but it's pretty hard when Valve hasn't said a word about it since fucking August...
Armleuchterchen · 1 points · Posted at 21:54:31 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
That, and making me spend more christmas money on the new Gwent expansion instead of HS...I really wanted to play Hunter this expansion but at this point one of the unrevealed cards has to be bonkers for that to happen.
backinredd · 7 points · Posted at 05:01:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tickling their nipples saying “ooooh you need good hunter cards. Sorry we can’t do that. Why don’t you find another card game? Oh there’s nothing as good? Oh that’s too bad.”
InCactusMaximus · 1 points · Posted at 21:26:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well, there are other games as good but they're more expensive. (Magic)
aznatheist620 · 1 points · Posted at 20:50:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
here's the VOD to the reveal in case anyone might think it's a hoax: https://www.zhanqi.tv/v2/videos/363848.html
Skip to 55:22
StupidLikeFox · 853 points · Posted at 03:04:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...............should this not be summon 2 animal companions. Summon 3 if you have no minions? It doesn't make sense as is. Way too bad.
F0xtails · 533 points · Posted at 04:03:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
1 companion = 3 mana
2 companion = 6 mana + have literally no minions in your deck as a hunter
3 companion = 9 mana
Seems legit to me
AlonsoQ · 93 points · Posted at 04:48:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, this is the baffling part. I get that Blizz doesn't want Face Hunter to get an 8/4 Charge for 6, but it's not even exceptional when you jump through the hoop.
Domolloth · 61 points · Posted at 05:21:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They could just make it so that you always get 2 different companions so it's never 8 damage to face, so even that's not really an excuse.
Does ANYONE have ANY idea why Blizzard hates hunter?
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 64 points · Posted at 05:54:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Because it chews through the meta at sub-20 ranks, where people are most likely to waste a bunch of money acquiring useless Legendaries since they're all "that one cool boss from my favorite WoW raid back in the day"
In other words, Hunter scares away potential "whales" from Hearthstone on a regular basis, and since it also happens to be the most "F2P-friendly" class, they can just nerf the fuck out of it to keep its winrate artificially suppressed with minimal financial blowback
Fatal1ty_93_RUS · 9 points · Posted at 16:16:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Instead those sub 20 rank people face quest mages, jade druids, and big priests. That's so much better, right?
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 3 points · Posted at 02:39:33 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Those decks cost way more than Aggro Hunter to create, which means that Blizzard's already happy if they exist because noobs are starting to spend serious money at those ranks already
Dominating Ranked cheaply is the one sin that Blizzard can't stand, and only Hunter's kit is inherently tuned to achieve it
amasimar · 2 points · Posted at 19:08:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But Pirate Warrior and previously Aggro/Midrange Shaman were fine at all ranks because you've had to have some cards hehe xd
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 03:25:35 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Pirates needed the legendary Patches, and Shaman required LoE adventure wings (plus they were both eventually nerfed into oblivion anyway, which you conveniently forgot to point out here, so no they weren't "fine at all ranks" by the end)
In its heyday, Hunter required neither levels of up-front investment for its Aggro archetype, plus its Hero Power alone put 7/9 classes on a health-clock for no extra cost
OtherJesus · 1 points · Posted at 15:53:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Never thought about that, but I have a suspicion you are 110% correct.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 02:37:08 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, how else do the facts line up mate :\
We have like, two years' worth of evidence staring us in the face at this point
softgray · 1 points · Posted at 18:50:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's so dumb though. Couldn't they just print an overpowered legendary and crowd out the F2P decks?
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 02:47:06 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm not really sure what you meant here
BlckKnght · 1 points · Posted at 23:39:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is only considered "F2P-Friendly" because it has zero playable Epics and only one marginally playable legendary in standard (the Death Knight, which you may have received for free). It's F2P-Friendly because getting more hunter cards and using them is likely to make your deck worse.
terminbee · 1 points · Posted at 08:39:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think even if this one said "summon 2 animal companions of your choice," it'd still suck.
FroggenOP · 223 points · Posted at 03:08:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is what it should have been, we found our [[Purify]] of the expansion, and even purify had some uses
Edit: where is leokk?
HeatFireAsh · 260 points · Posted at 03:35:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card makes purify look like ultimate infestation.
iShapeshift · 99 points · Posted at 03:14:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify was a common.
sitenuker · 3 points · Posted at 12:18:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To be fair, Purify being common made it worse as it would have screwed Priest in Arena. Blizz wisely decided it would not appear in Arena after the backlash and I'm sure this card will not appear in Arena either.
iwanttosaysmth · 30 points · Posted at 03:47:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify was used in silecne Priest, the deck that was at least fun, this is ridicoulous
coy47 · -6 points · Posted at 04:12:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes but it always felt like silence priest was made to defend the decision of ever making purify.
quacak · 3 points · Posted at 03:22:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It only summons 2 companions, no Leokks.
psymunn · 1 points · Posted at 04:44:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Silence priest was actually a high tier deck in un'goro
TeamAquaGrunt · 6 points · Posted at 05:27:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
that's not where the purify hate comes from, it comes from a time when priest was a tier 5 class and got a card for an archetype that didnt exist yet.
psymunn · 1 points · Posted at 06:08:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes, and it was a mistake. but the card isn't as bad as was warranted. although leaving it out of arena was smart, because it's trash tier there, and it certainly would have been salt in the wounds
oopoctothorpe · -2 points · Posted at 03:39:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is Yogg-N-Load support.
dougtulane · 5 points · Posted at 03:45:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg-n-load wants cheap spells.
If this cost 4, maybe.
Lord_Dust_Bunny · 17 points · Posted at 03:48:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Also, Yogg-n-load wants to actually run Yogg.
oopoctothorpe · 2 points · Posted at 06:24:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Gotta have something to play post yogg!
dougtulane · 1 points · Posted at 04:10:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ha ha, OMG it just keeps getting worse.
It’s almost perfect how bad it is.
oopoctothorpe · 0 points · Posted at 06:24:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think bigger spells are pretty good for it, too!
The n'Load part was, typically, the hardest part to play effectively in yogg-n-load. Removal and burst was king.
Royalwithcheez · 62 points · Posted at 03:11:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It was probably this at some point and then the "balance" team made a spell hunter deck that was too OP for the shieldbearers in testing.
Brio_ · 10 points · Posted at 05:38:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It was winning games at rank 23 so it had to be toned down.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 3 points · Posted at 05:56:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's honestly not even a joke; I have a feeling the "whale" community is partially comprised of a fuckload of noobs who just craft "cool" bosses from their favorite WoW raids
SerellRosalia · 1 points · Posted at 10:17:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!" Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
backinredd · 16 points · Posted at 03:13:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dude this is hunter. No way they would give him good cards.
GarlicNerd · 14 points · Posted at 03:28:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Rip Alleria buyers
socopithy · -10 points · Posted at 04:01:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Did you just assume Alleria’s gender???
hav0cbl00d · 11 points · Posted at 04:03:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or the card could cost 4
frekc · 1 points · Posted at 06:04:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or even 5.. Anything
hav0cbl00d · 1 points · Posted at 07:48:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
By my side now costs 10
themathmajician · 1 points · Posted at 06:51:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Still unplayable
Final_Hatsamu · 1 points · Posted at 07:06:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even at 4 it would be a bad card, that's the sad part.
IIIBRaSSIII · 2 points · Posted at 08:22:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How many animal companions would this have to summon in order for it to be playable? 5? 6? A hunter deck without minions basically can't win, so this card needs to be able to literally win the game by itself in order to be played.
Soda_Muffin · 1 points · Posted at 04:08:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah and this just makes me think the hunter spellstone would have been cooler if it made companions instead of wolves.
Akalhar · 1 points · Posted at 04:41:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 for 6 mana would be insanely strong. But 1 for 6 is easily the worst card of the expansion so far.
StupidLikeFox · 1 points · Posted at 04:42:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 for 6 would not be insanely strong at all. My thrown out there 3 for 6 (with the existing condition) would be insanely strong but 2 for 6 is just completely fair.
Animal Companion is 3 mana, Call of the Wild is 9. 3 times 2 is 6.
Akalhar · 1 points · Posted at 05:01:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I strongly disagree.
Both of those that you mention are really strong cards. 2 for 6 gives more benefit than 1 for 3.
Look at it this way. Early game, you almost never want Leokk, though a 4/4 taunt or huffer are both good. At 6 mana, you want to either push damage on their face to close out the game, or need to immediately impact the board because you're losing. You are guaranteed to do the later (at worst, you get a taunt + Leokk or failing that, a 5 attack charger. You might even get Misha and Huffer for a big board swing). If you are winning and want to go face, you are guaranteed to get at least one of Leokk or Huffer, both which really help you in that situation. 50% of the time, you'll get both.
2 for 6 would see a ton of play. Might even take over the Highmane slot in most hunter decks.
StupidLikeFox · 1 points · Posted at 07:46:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It'd be played and would be reasonable in terms of cost and power. We seem to have different definitions of "insanely strong".
Akalhar · 1 points · Posted at 05:01:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But yeah. With the restriction, it could read:
"If your deck contains no minions, summon 3 Legendary Dinosaurs (Krush, Dredd, Carnassa)" and still not be very good.
jostler57 · 1 points · Posted at 08:54:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It should be a CotW for this ridiculous caveat.
And it should cost 4 or less.
Absolutely trash epic card. Garbage.
Keetek · 1 points · Posted at 11:22:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That design would make sense.
DanTheLadiesManV2 · 0 points · Posted at 03:12:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Besides the fact that'd be completely busted?
Nerdtron93 · 7 points · Posted at 03:17:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's average normally, then amazing under an insane deck condition, that's not busted
StupidLikeFox · 3 points · Posted at 03:17:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would be, but...as is it just seems like a mistake.
Gatekeeper1310 · 0 points · Posted at 03:10:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean I get they are trying to push "Big Beast Hunter" with these minion generating spells and the Recruit Legendary but it's going to take a few more expansions to flesh it out which stings when Hunter has already been in the toilet for so long.
Tockity · 0 points · Posted at 03:56:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the idea is to make it so you basically can't put it in a deck that isn't built around a minion-less deck, but still gives it some use if you pull it in a random effect. It'd be much better at 5 mana, in my opinion, albeit still not good.
I think it may create some interesting decks in wild, but that's about it.
007thenextman · -9 points · Posted at 03:14:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Jesus christ your version is way more broken then original cotw ever was. Clear hunter's board? Nope, summon an even bigger one and take 5 to the face.
Akalhar · 13 points · Posted at 03:15:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Uh, it reads "if your DECK has no minions."
resbiansrock · 181 points · Posted at 03:07:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Genuinely thought this was a poorly designed custom card.
snpowers · 6 points · Posted at 04:09:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Same I had no idea this was real until I read the comments. What the fuck is this garbage. I hope to God it's just a joke and blizzard is just grabbing our goblins right now.
Santithebest · 2 points · Posted at 15:29:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
how can someone make a card this bad lol
Raktoner · 426 points · Posted at 03:07:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is garbage. This is almost insulting to hunter players. Who green lit this? Who looks at the state of Hunter and goes, "you know what Hunters need in the epic slot? Shit."
NotAHost · 62 points · Posted at 03:39:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hopefully whatever they planned for the epic slot got pushed down to a lower rarity to make it more accessible.
DrQuint · 2 points · Posted at 10:27:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's still bad. Because maybe for it you did get those other hunter tools, but you're still being denied, for up to 10 packs, the ability to get an epic card and other classes DO have important epic cards.
jmtz920 · 38 points · Posted at 03:42:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dude, you just put into words what I just felt when seeing the card.....I love hunter, but it’s just not fun for me anymore and cards like this don’t help. I think this reveal reinforced my decision to not spend money on the game anymore....[audible sigh]
Raktoner · 9 points · Posted at 03:46:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm also not spending money on this expansion. I got a bit of gold saved up, enough for 60 packs, and it probably won't be enough to be competitive with the terrible dust economy.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 2 points · Posted at 05:58:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We're all in this together, mate
Hang tough :P
swishersweex · 3 points · Posted at 04:26:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
inb4 hunter legendary weapon turns all minions in your deck into copies of Animal Companion
thebaron420 · 2 points · Posted at 04:25:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I've been insulted by the hunter cards in every set for a while now
Waldorg · 2 points · Posted at 14:17:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This IS fucking insulting to hunter. I'm so angry right now, Team 5 can go fuck themselves
jaycshah99 · 1 points · Posted at 04:16:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
zzxyyzx · 1 points · Posted at 04:22:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They're planning to delete Hunter once Gadgetzan rotates. Too many new players complaining about SMorc.
OBRkenobi · 1 points · Posted at 06:30:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
ecnarongi · 68 points · Posted at 03:09:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow, how is this card this bad. Twice the mana cost but conditional to cast Animal Companion twice. That is abysmal.
Holy shit, as long as hunters have "steady shot" the dev team doesn't even fucking try.
[deleted] · 419 points · Posted at 03:04:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Call of the Mild.
Gatekeeper1310 · 237 points · Posted at 03:11:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The Dream: Call of the Mild (3 Mana) - Summon a Stonetusk Boar, a Timber Wolf, and a 0/1 Frog with Taunt.
KittenNoodleSoup · 141 points · Posted at 03:13:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
that would actually be a great card
Arlyaq · 65 points · Posted at 03:42:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And miles better than the garbage we were just given.
dougtulane · 22 points · Posted at 03:59:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That would be so damn good. 3 bodies to curve into houndmaster. That’s right on par with muster for best 3-drop
marimbist11 · 8 points · Posted at 05:08:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That’s so cute and I want it so badly but instead we got ass
OtherJesus · 1 points · Posted at 15:48:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I would actually run that card to be honest. That's actually really fucking good.
[deleted] · 131 points · Posted at 03:06:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a perfect card for Control Hunter. It fits perfectly in with [[Toxic Arrow]].
Cunt_Crusher69 · 75 points · Posted at 03:22:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This into Huffer+toxic arrow into concede...pure genius of Team 5.
[deleted] · 25 points · Posted at 03:23:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If my enemy Toxic Arrows a newly summoned huffer, I would instantly concede. That right there is a sign that they don't fuck around.
XFactorNova · 1 points · Posted at 03:36:45 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
You should play against me. Huffer for 3 mana, hit face, Arcane shot my Huffer for 1 mana. SoMuchWinning.
Karl_Marx_ · 2 points · Posted at 04:57:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dude. Why can't it just be 1 mana? 2 card board clear wouldn't even be that OP for hunter.
Ildona · 62 points · Posted at 03:46:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man, that's the annoying thing here.
First, I actually think an "Oops all spells" deck for Hunter is cool. On The Hunt, Cat Trick, Animal Companion, Call of the Wild, Unleash the Hounds, etc all puts minions in play from spells. Hunter actually has more of these cards than any class.
You can pair it with secrets, Eaglehorn Bow, Deathstalker, etc pretty well.
But how the hell do you survive long enough?
You use secrets and hit things with your face to control the board until you die from using your face to control the board. Nope, can't use the Secret synergy minions because you can't have them in your deck. No Putricide, no Secretkeeper, no Cloaked Huntress.
You use taunts to stay alive? Well, no minions in this deck. Additionally, you gotta make that 33% roll to get Misha.
Oh, and in standard, the secrets that actually put minions on board? Two require your minions to be attacked. So you'll have to combo those with the new Wandering Monster in order to actually trigger them semi-consistently. The only one left is the definitely-not-a-defensive-option Cat Trick.
So, you use your spells for removal. Do you use your RNG-based Deadly Shot that, for me today, lost 12/14 50:50 chances? Or do you use your Toxic Arrow, that's a strictly worse Darkbomb for a deck like this? Kill Command is gimp without a stock of beasts to use with it. Maybe you use Multi-Shot for a bit more RNG, or Explosive Shot for a drastically worse Meteor?
And even then. Let's assume there's a deck that can get away with running this card because it has no minions in it. The hell does Leokk do in a minionless deck?
Fucking hell, Team 5. I want to play Hunter.
How the fuck does this line up against Spreading Plague in the 6 mana slot?
That said, the art and name are pretty sweet. Looking forward to the gold animation.
el3r9 · 5 points · Posted at 06:18:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I agree with your post, but [[Bear Trap]].
Ildona · 4 points · Posted at 06:51:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In Wild, sure.
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 06:18:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 Mana - Secret: After your hero is attacked, summon a 3/3 Bear with Taunt.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
OBRkenobi · 2 points · Posted at 06:29:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah. The art's too cartoony and the name's unoriginal.
Ildona · 3 points · Posted at 07:10:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The name? It's a Rexxar line in both Heroes of the Storm and Hearthstone.
He says it when you cast Animal Companion.
So, eh? It does what he wants, I think it's fine.
And if you think the art in a children's card game is too cartoony, I have bad news for you... Like, Kill Command's art is literally by a cartoonist.
OBRkenobi · 1 points · Posted at 09:29:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know, that's why.
KittyMulcher · 1 points · Posted at 07:39:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
at least toxic arrow is a good bad card this is just vanilla awful. imo, it should at least be a call of the wild on 6. Big hunter would actually be funny this is depressing.
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 03:07:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 Mana - Deal 2 damage to a minion. If it survives, give it Poisonous.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
TicTacTime · 5 points · Posted at 03:07:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The meme is real LUL.
_element91 · 1 points · Posted at 03:27:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
reaaaally Mild..
OBRkenobi · 1 points · Posted at 06:27:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Call of the concede button.
ProsecutorBlue · 1 points · Posted at 07:51:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Call of the Riled.
Exorrt · 141 points · Posted at 03:13:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess we found the Epic everyone will be opening 4 of in their pre-order!
snake4641 · 6 points · Posted at 06:53:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’ve already opened 5 AMA
bloodflart · 3 points · Posted at 15:43:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If I open this in my first round of packs I will uninstall
idkshh · 118 points · Posted at 03:10:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
thats a joke, right?
GodoftheGodcreators · 2 points · Posted at 15:27:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
even when the absurd condition is met it's just all right mediocre card that might summon two leoks which then seem pretty bad because you dont have any minions
Riot_PR_Guy · 246 points · Posted at 03:22:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
WE HAVE A WINNER FOLKS!
Everyone give it up for the worst card of Kobolds and Catacombs!!
It's been a great competition this expansion - lots of excellent candidates. Big thank you to all the other trash cards. We'll see you on December 7!
Edit: This shitpost would have been better if I cited other absolutely garbage cards (there's so many to name!) but I guess you could say I came down with a case of the 'Team 5's so I don't feel like doing the extra effort
Shaunymon · 166 points · Posted at 03:29:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hold up, we still need to see Hunter's Legendary Weapon
10 mana 3/3 weapon
Battlecry: Cast Toxic Arrow on each friendly minion.
leeroyPOfaceless · 94 points · Posted at 03:33:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No no no, having hard removal is against hunter's "class identity." How about:
Battlecry: Destroy your hero.
tzarl98 · 73 points · Posted at 04:53:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Now hold on. "destroy your hero" is a little too flexible for hunter. Hunter shouldn't be the best class at suicide, especially in the late game. This is way better than the old auchenai+reno combo that priest could pull off, and they need to play two cards in a singleton deck. How about:
Battlecry: Destroy a random friendly character.
xGearsOfToastx · 12 points · Posted at 04:54:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Woah, it saves me the trouble of conceding. That's some serious powercreep for Rexxar right there. Added benefit is I can actually dodge the, "Well fought, I concede" line so as to avoid complimenting my opponent. Instead I can just hear Rexxar's dying voiceline, which seems to be the theme for Hunter this
expansionrotation.trentcoolyak · 1 points · Posted at 06:57:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Top meme, but hard removal is 100% not against hunter's identity. Having RELIABLE hard removal is against their identity... crushing walls and deadly shot.
UberEinstein99 · 17 points · Posted at 03:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That’s still better than this card.
Shaunymon · 38 points · Posted at 03:34:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Right, better fix that
10 mana 1/1 weapon
Battlecry: Cast Toxic Arrow on each friendly character. Repeat until you control no minions.
RedTulkas · 26 points · Posted at 04:01:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Imagine the combo potential with unstable ghoul
OBRkenobi · 1 points · Posted at 06:36:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
XD
UberEinstein99 · 2 points · Posted at 05:15:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tbh I would still seriously run that card over this. Atleast that’s full boardclear with abomination...
Akalhar · 2 points · Posted at 05:29:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah, it will be:
"Hemet's Skinning Knife" 2 mana 1/4 Battlecry: If your deck contains minions, remove them all.
Shaunymon · 2 points · Posted at 05:48:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'd definitely make meme decks out of that though.
You could even use it like Tracking to get to your Death Knight earlier on.
ETHERjimbo · 2 points · Posted at 06:59:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
10 mana 1/1 weapon,
When this weapon is destroyed cast To My Side! Cast twice if you have no spells in your deck.
Riot_PR_Guy · 1 points · Posted at 03:50:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good point! Team 5 gunna be like "Hol' up - imma let you finish but..."
Hyper-Hippo · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
FTFY.
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 04:38:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And i thought crushing walls was bad...
dnl101 · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Rin and Runespear might have a word with you.
Riot_PR_Guy · 1 points · Posted at 13:47:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least can be fun
troopacoopa · 109 points · Posted at 04:15:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let this card be a lesson to people who pre-ordered before seeing all of the cards. This is the content you pay for.
Juicenewton248 · 53 points · Posted at 03:24:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
im fairly certain now that the design philosphy for hunter cards is to design a good card and reduce all the relevant numbers on it by 1 after
conrocket · 19 points · Posted at 03:27:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reduce all numbers by one, except the Mana cost. So disappointing
_element91 · 45 points · Posted at 03:09:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
???
phoenixmusicman · 1 points · Posted at 10:18:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nani?
Zerokx · 41 points · Posted at 04:15:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what the fuck?
There is a 3 mana card that summons 1 companion, a 9 mana card that summons 3, and none of them have a condition?
And this requires no minions in the deck?? In HUNTER????
??????
??????
??????
wiener-fu · 3 points · Posted at 08:51:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
See, this card is obviously printed so that you can play animal companion on curve on turn 6, and if you happen to run a minionless deck you get a bonus! It's amazing value!
forfiveseven · 73 points · Posted at 03:04:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Absolute garbage. Why would you run spell hunter, and why does it cost 6? Even if it cost 5 it would probably not see play.
[deleted] · 69 points · Posted at 03:15:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
Moshiyitsu · 33 points · Posted at 03:25:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It could eventually be good at 4 in the future once hunter gets enough good spells to support it. At 6 though, this wouldn't even be a good card in a spell only deck.
thegooblop · 3 points · Posted at 04:05:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I doubt that, if this cost 4 mana you could bet your ass people would try to build around it. The insane tempo gained from 2 animal companions on turn 4 isn't something to ignore, there are games that are won just by a basic animal companion card on turn 3 already.
phoenixmusicman · 1 points · Posted at 10:18:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At 4 it could see play as a slightly more expensive animal companion for a two-fer
dragonitetrainer · 0 points · Posted at 03:30:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The way the card is written makes me think you can choose which companion is played, in which case it would be a good 4 mana card
aaninja64 · 6 points · Posted at 03:53:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would have the Discover keyword if you got a choice.
yuube · 8 points · Posted at 03:10:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m assuming for the new hunter legendary, only roll a few big minions for the recruits.
Kidsune · 30 points · Posted at 03:17:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But if you still have any minions in your deck, it's absolute garbage.
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:10:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thats the point you get out the big minions with recruits and have a shitload of spells.
Kidsune · 2 points · Posted at 06:17:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's a super counter intuitive idea, and a terrible deck.
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:18:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard starts releasing cards for an archetype that often doesnt look good until 3 expansions later.
[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 03:18:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 2 points · Posted at 06:08:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
im just acknowledging the archetype theyre pushing. Its obvious.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:13:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 1 points · Posted at 06:15:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Its really not, you get a few large big minions for facing and the rest are spells, we already did this before with yogged and loaded and it was a decent deck.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:23:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
yuube · 1 points · Posted at 07:33:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal companion is a good card, so if you get the 2 its just like having 4 more animal companions.
GarlicNerd · 5 points · Posted at 03:20:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The Hunter legendary is a minion, and so are the Beasts she pulls.
Shanaaro · 5 points · Posted at 03:27:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter will be getting a legendary weapon too, remember.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:33:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
Shanaaro · 3 points · Posted at 03:34:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
'If your deck has no minions, gain Spell Damage +4 for the rest of the game.' Would probably not be terrible. Just messing around, though.
yuube · 1 points · Posted at 06:09:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That does not conflict with my statement.
Shreckislove69 · 76 points · Posted at 03:08:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally unplayable wtf is this card.
aaninja64 · 7 points · Posted at 03:55:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Happy cake day lol, enjoy your garbage Hunter epic
jaycshah99 · 3 points · Posted at 04:27:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
*you mean your 4th copy of it in the 10 epics you'll unpack from your preorder
.
.
.
Laughs in ben brode
bollesyy · 73 points · Posted at 03:52:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As a hunter main, this genuinely makes me not want to play the game anymore
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 3 points · Posted at 06:01:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I've been having fun trying Keleseth/Carnassa memes on ladder
Hang in there mate, we're in this together
wiener-fu · 3 points · Posted at 08:46:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What do you mean? There's obviously great synergy between this card and the new hunter legendary!
/s
bloodflart · 1 points · Posted at 15:45:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Did they reveal it or the weapon yet?
Waldorg · 6 points · Posted at 14:18:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's already over, this expansion will be my last one, it's fucking insulting
Falonefal · 70 points · Posted at 03:52:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So for 6 mana you get the effect you SHOULD have for 6 mana but only if you cripple yourself.
I am 10000000000000% certain there was a miscommunication and this isn't the real card, there's another comment like this already, but I'm pretty sure they're being sarcastic, I'm being real, this card actually CANNOT be real, it has no advantage whatsoever, it's literally infinitely worse than purify, and purify was bad already until an expansion improved it.
This card cannot be improved, there's nothing that will ever make this card good.
EDIT: this is my favourite thing I've been wrong about.
phoenixmusicman · 4 points · Posted at 10:18:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has to be a practical joke of some kind
SerellRosalia · 1 points · Posted at 10:23:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, you don't get it! This card is so overpowered, Blizzard made sure to give Priest a single card with the power to shut the entire minionless hunter archetype down! laughs in psychic scream
pianobadger · 94 points · Posted at 03:03:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What a piece of shit
Yogg_Sothoth_Arbys · 117 points · Posted at 03:08:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Expansion with tons of needed epics ✓
Another bad hunter epic to dilute the pool ✓
Unplayable ✓
6 mana Leokk ✓
Pledge__ · 3 points · Posted at 04:37:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What're the needed epics?
And also, since there'd be that many epics anyways, is having a bad one that bad? Means there's less to craft overall generally?
Yogg_Sothoth_Arbys · 5 points · Posted at 05:08:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If there's more in the pool that are bad, youre more likely to open worse ones on average, making you craft the ones you didn't get. Not a big deal if it's a few cards, it's expected, but always shafting hunter is just icing on the cake.
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 05:45:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's true, though i think if you're only opening, say, 10 epics or something, I'd rather miss on a few of them and only need to cast a few, rather than get a bunch of good epics but need to craft way more. Guess we'll have to see though. Least I don't have to craft epics for hunter this expansion...
Pacify_ · 1 points · Posted at 07:42:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I've counted 11-12 so far that have a decent chance of being meta
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Looking through... yeah I can see about that same number at the moment, though a lot of them are class specific so if you don't particularly like some classes you're in luck I guess. Then again having the needed ones neutral tends to be better overall I guess..
Hashmouse · 88 points · Posted at 03:03:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wtf, garbage card
gwasp · 8 points · Posted at 03:48:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hearthstone being digital card game it is really easy to buff cards that turn out to be underperforming. \s
FroggenOP · 81 points · Posted at 03:04:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
even in 'control', 'big' hunter this is bad. Holy god pls don't give me this
GameBoy09 · 69 points · Posted at 03:06:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Big Hunter runs Big Minions.
What the hell deck is this going into?
FroggenOP · 44 points · Posted at 03:08:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
not even yog, because that's a minion and hunter doesn't have enough good speels
Torkon · 1 points · Posted at 06:17:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg 'n' Load in wild is actually super fun, but even it plays minions like the free secret one, trackers, yogg, etc.
jimmythebusdriver · 8 points · Posted at 03:08:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Barnes Yshaarj Hunter obviously. pls don't do this to us Blizzard
GameBoy09 · 22 points · Posted at 03:09:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
BUT THOSE ARE MINIONS TOO.
Like what were they thinking?!?!
FroggenOP · 14 points · Posted at 03:15:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
everyone is a god and draw Barnes turn 4?
amulshah7 · 2 points · Posted at 03:07:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg and Load hunter
THE_BACON_IS_GONE · 17 points · Posted at 03:09:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Without Yogg?
frostedWarlock · 7 points · Posted at 03:19:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or Thaurissan or King's Elekk or any other minions that make sense in such a deck.
bloodflart · 1 points · Posted at 15:44:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The deck with the only minions being Barnes and yshaarj
Jgj7700 · 96 points · Posted at 03:38:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Whoever designed this card should be fired. The fact that it made it into the set makes me extremely disappointed. On one hand, the fact that it's an Epic is good because I don't want one. On the other hand, when I inevitably open it instead of a playable Epic I'm going to feel like I got ripped off.
SerellRosalia · 2 points · Posted at 10:23:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 03:41:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[removed]
Hermke · 3 points · Posted at 07:43:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
TIL Patches is a fired game designer. Makes sense though, I think he designed Patches and that's why he gets shot out of a cannon now. That card is still pretty busted in another way
dessert-er · 3 points · Posted at 04:41:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Too much. This is a video game.
Edgitodoesreddit · 116 points · Posted at 03:15:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dude I want to downvote, but I know isn't your fault to show this shit card
yokkora · 6 points · Posted at 04:08:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wish I could downvote too buddy.
LichtbringerU · 1 points · Posted at 23:12:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wonder what the Streamer that got to reveal the card did to Blizzard...
backinredd · 27 points · Posted at 03:11:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly jokes aside, this is super trash. I actually felt disgusted after looking at this card as I realised the devs only see Hunter as a starter class now, for noobies to play and win sometimes. You’re only gonna win if you have good draws on curve and if your opponent has bad draws. Now it’s gonna be even worse with all the removals other classes are getting. . 6 mana summon an animal companion? Wtf kind of defence is that? Like two of them gonna defend your board if you have no minions on 6th turn? If hunter has no minions by turn 6, it’s just bad news. Bye bye Hunter. It was fun playing you. Edit: Holy shit this is an epic card. Bye bye Death stalker Rexxar.
ineedwaffles1 · 49 points · Posted at 03:07:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what is this piece of garbage lol
HongdongDonald · 22 points · Posted at 03:22:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Biyouxia is the streamer who also revealed [[Call of the Wild]]. LUL
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
9 Mana - Summon all three Animal Companions.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
[deleted] · 25 points · Posted at 03:37:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[removed]
UberEinstein99 · 14 points · Posted at 03:52:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m pretty sure that Blizz knew this card was bad when they printed it.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 05:08:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just when you thought they couldn't top the dogshit epics they gave hunter last xpac, this must be some running joke at blizzard, great way to lose customers!
SerellRosalia · 0 points · Posted at 10:27:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Employee #1 "Hey guys, I'm thinking of creating a new archetype for Hunters. Hear me out.... minionless hunter!"
Employee #2 "Oh shit that could possibly become overpowered! We better preemptively give Priest a single spell that shuts the entire archetype down, just in case"
asneon · 24 points · Posted at 03:15:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wtf is this card? This can't be real
MarloweOS · 23 points · Posted at 03:37:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Any chance this is a translation error?
stan13ag · 14 points · Posted at 03:49:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I was hoping it would say if you don't have minions in your hand....
Jondarawr · 2 points · Posted at 08:24:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
See, that seems playable in mid range hunter.
AlexAverage · 1 points · Posted at 11:39:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It doesn't. It would be as close to being played as the original none.
phoenixmusicman · 2 points · Posted at 10:20:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That'd be garbage but at least better than this hot shit garbage
[deleted] · 43 points · Posted at 03:08:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
jgomez315 · 8 points · Posted at 03:41:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
meh, you could treachery ticking bomb dude at least, for the memes.
SpyderEyez · 4 points · Posted at 05:26:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah this one summons two minions so you have to use two Treacheries
LyonsX · 1 points · Posted at 06:55:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I use it in Miracle Rogue sometimes since it runs so few minions!
BritishStewie · 2 points · Posted at 04:03:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least ticking won me several games in arena
TheDarkMaster13 · 1 points · Posted at 06:23:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The crazy thing I'm imagining is if they had another reveal fiasco and this had been the only card revealed.
C1ap_trap · 49 points · Posted at 03:09:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why in the fuck does it cost 6 mana? Even 4 would be too much
CivilKobold · 3 points · Posted at 03:23:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal companion is 3 and chooses a random one. This card should be 4, to be great, 5, to be fair. Since you choose the companion. As it is now it is worse than bad.
maximsm98 · 13 points · Posted at 03:57:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
you dont choose the companion for this one though
CivilKobold · 1 points · Posted at 06:59:45 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
If that's true it is horrid.
shadow0wolf0 · 4 points · Posted at 03:32:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There is no way a hunter deck containing no minions would be possible so at four it would still be bad just because it’s in a currently unplayable deck.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 04:06:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think he is saying that at 4 mana you would just play it in a regular deck (with minions) and it would be pretty good because for 4 mana you get to choose which animal companion you get.
You wouldn't ever meet the condition to get 2 companions, but that's fine.
shadow0wolf0 · 2 points · Posted at 04:27:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Taking a second look having the flexibility would be worth four mana but definitely not five and it is unplayable at six.
CivilKobold · 1 points · Posted at 07:00:41 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I was thinking that you would choose the companion, but am being told I am wrong.
Korn_Bread · 2 points · Posted at 05:12:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm betting money that this is a random animal companion not a chosen one. It doesn't say random but there are plenty of cards this expansion that they leave out the word random because they are afraid that too many cards have the word this expac, or there isn't enough room on the card.
CivilKobold · 1 points · Posted at 06:59:26 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
If it is random it would really suck, not just kinda suck like it would if you could discover it, really super succ.
Gabriel710 · 22 points · Posted at 03:15:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this a meme? This card is horrible
metsfan1025 · 20 points · Posted at 04:09:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Easily countered by weasel tunneler, 0/5
Bphore · 3 points · Posted at 05:27:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As if it needs help to be unplayable.
greenjellay · 1 points · Posted at 06:33:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
First time for everything
Lfoboros · 20 points · Posted at 03:10:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Team 5 hates Hunter!
bmfalbo · 3 points · Posted at 05:24:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"Hunter has a 50%+ winrate from ranks 25-16 so we don't need to give it any more tools. By the way, here are some more broken Priest cards!"
-Team 5
Waldorg · 1 points · Posted at 14:19:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Team 5 can go fuck themselves, I'm out
TitaniumForce · 17 points · Posted at 03:09:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel awful for the people that open multiple copies of this as their epics.
RedTulkas · 19 points · Posted at 03:15:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are they serious
marshatothedimes · 18 points · Posted at 03:19:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good Lord this card is awful.
[deleted] · 19 points · Posted at 03:28:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess all the hunter haters are getting what they asked for. If this card isn't proof that blizzard hates hunter then I dunno what is.
PSI-Healing · 38 points · Posted at 03:11:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This will be playable in wild in a decade when over years and years hunter has gotten enough good spells and weapons to make a no-minion deck work.
Maybe, as a one-of.
xGearsOfToastx · 14 points · Posted at 05:02:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If after years and years, after countless expansions, THIS is what makes it into a viable Hunter deck in Wild, we will need a new tier system that goes down to tier 10. We will call it Rexxar Tier.
Pledge__ · 2 points · Posted at 05:10:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
By then the spells will be good enough to eclipse this.
... CURRENT spells eclispse this, the spellstone is so much better.
bmfalbo · 1 points · Posted at 05:19:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's honestly not even worth running then, I'd rather just play 2 animal companions and a Call of the Wild
BeBenNova · 38 points · Posted at 04:15:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I swear to fucking god if i ever unpack this card i'm uninstalling the game
[deleted] · 11 points · Posted at 10:04:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
GOLDEN EPIC!
wtfduud · 1 points · Posted at 01:38:34 on December 9, 2017 · (Permalink)
Did you get it?
CriticallyAlmost · 69 points · Posted at 03:05:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
blizz if you're gonna push control hunter please actually push it, this is awful
_element91 · 110 points · Posted at 03:13:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They ARE pushing it...................off a cliff.. into the abyss..
TeehSandMan · 16 points · Posted at 03:10:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unless this comes with reverting the CotW nerf this garbage is unacceptable.
IPreferBagels · 17 points · Posted at 03:15:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't believe they could actually print a card like this. I am extremely disappointed blizzard.
hearthreddit · 43 points · Posted at 03:06:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They really want hunter to be bad, i can't find any other explanation.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 4 points · Posted at 06:01:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can't have Hunter getting too good or it spooks all of the potentially profitable noobs away
dnl101 · 2 points · Posted at 10:26:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Comparing the hunter cards with priest cards is painfull. It's like an elemantary schooler made them with clear favorites in play.
[deleted] · 14 points · Posted at 05:35:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Reno gives you the best heal of all time to not run duplicates. Keleseth gives aggro decks the best two drop of all time if you cut other 2 cost cards. Not all too high of a sacrifice for an insane reward.
This cuts like 90% of all possible hunter cards available for decks, in reward of a 6-drop that's worse than highmane, which requires no limitations at all.
This is actually the worst card of all time.
Arya_Dark · 27 points · Posted at 03:22:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what pisses me off the most about this is they make this an epic. You should feel pretty damn great when you get an epic in your pack...but then you open this shit.... That's terrible Team Five and you should feel ashamed.
Tobyuoso · 11 points · Posted at 04:47:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They really want their microtransactions to become an actual gamble.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 2 points · Posted at 06:05:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This dilutes the overall pool of Epics your pack RNG pulls from ... they know exactly what they're doing lol
Jblack2236 · 11 points · Posted at 03:28:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this for real? You have to meet a hard criteria to get 0 mana discount? This can’t be serious.
assassin10 · -1 points · Posted at 03:43:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's a bit more than a 0-mana discount. Two Animal Companions is quite strong.
Jblack2236 · 1 points · Posted at 03:52:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
True, but it’s also the exact same effect as 2 3 mana cards which you hardly ever see done for the exact same mana
assassin10 · 0 points · Posted at 03:55:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, combining two cards together usually increases the total cost by one (until you get into the really high mana costs).
111AlaN111 · 2 points · Posted at 09:12:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a class card so it should be above neutral card power level. Also it competes with Highmane. It shouldnt exceed the 5 mana cost
UnfunImDone · 12 points · Posted at 03:29:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Did they make this card designed specifically for the Lich King fight?
rottenborough · 11 points · Posted at 04:48:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One day, when there are enough cards in Wild, there will be a viable Hunter deck that is made up of mostly spells and weapons...
and it will play Highmanes for 6 drop instead of this card.
HeatFireAsh · 50 points · Posted at 03:33:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The guy who designs the hunter cards should be fired.
jmtz920 · 10 points · Posted at 03:51:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wish I could upvote this more
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 06:03:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They all design the cards
It's an intentional effort to keep Hunter's winrate suppressed so Sub-20 noobs don't run away, taking their money with them
Waldorg · 1 points · Posted at 14:21:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's fucking insulting
Taxouck · 21 points · Posted at 03:21:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know this is my third comment now, but I'm just... Baffled. I cannot comprehend why they'd print this card. It's terrible on every level, it's basically insulting.
PokeJem7 · 8 points · Posted at 03:10:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I expect the hunter weapon to reduce all spells by 3, and fill your hand with copies of this spell. I can't think of any other way it will be good.
Shaunymon · 36 points · Posted at 03:16:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are you kidding me? Is Hunter really going to stay dead forever?
This is more insulting than when Purify was released.
SomberC-thun · 11 points · Posted at 04:32:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As a priest main I saw the up side with purify, I knew it be decent with more support. But this card. I just can't, it's way over priced for an up side not even worth the cost. At 6 man I can play two AC, people say 4 Mana maybe but I'd say 3.
OtherJesus · 2 points · Posted at 15:33:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I always maintained that Purify would be a good card too. But this Hunter card? What the actual F?
xGearsOfToastx · 6 points · Posted at 05:00:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They wanted Deathrattles to be one of Hunter's class themes, they're just taking it a step further by actually killing it.
lantranar · 2 points · Posted at 04:10:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
as a priest main, I agree with you. I thought there would be no bigger spit to tha face than Purify.
Pledge__ · 2 points · Posted at 05:07:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least purify saw play due to the release of a single card.
I can see this seeing play, but it'd take a full set of REALLY good hunter spells to do so.
Murko_The_Cat · 2 points · Posted at 05:48:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And then it still wouldnt, cause the card is pretty bad even wit fulfilled condition
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It'd be the 29/30th card of the deck I imagine.
TheMrEM4N · 1 points · Posted at 08:10:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least Purify was a common. This will feel like a dagger in the back getting it as your epic.
DoktorAran · 9 points · Posted at 03:08:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That is a sad card. It isn't even that good of an effect for it's condition. Hunter is once again in such a bad state.
sandyssandydos · 9 points · Posted at 04:10:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a joke right? Even the card art is terrible!
Mordin___Solus · 9 points · Posted at 04:11:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't wait to open 6 of these!
Megido_Thanatos · 41 points · Posted at 03:04:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Found [[toxic arrow]] 2.0
jnpg · 88 points · Posted at 03:06:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
why are you giving this card such high appraise?
scotems · 5 points · Posted at 03:42:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
backinredd · 59 points · Posted at 03:14:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly toxic arrow is better.
scotems · 21 points · Posted at 03:42:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Right, Toxic Arrow was just shit. This is advanced shit.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 10:06:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Atleast Toxic Arrow can be used for some fun minions that are like "At the end of your turn, deal X damage to all/enemy minions"
jaycshah99 · 17 points · Posted at 03:21:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is MUCH worse. It should've been 10 mana fill your board with random animal companions or something so atleast there is a meme deck for this because 6 mana make 2 animal companions isn't even super powerful so actually wtf.
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 04:39:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
10 mana a bunch of companions would actually be surprisingly strong. Weak against AoE, but...
jaycshah99 · 2 points · Posted at 04:56:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yes but if you have no minons in your deck and you've survived till turn 10 as hunter you should atleast get to meme lol. You would have lost to any fast deck already and probably wouldn't even be able to beat jade druid with that.
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 05:44:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hehe, that's true.
I wasn't saying it'd be OP, just that it'd be fun and a good card.
boringdude00 · 15 points · Posted at 03:27:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This makes Toxic Arrow look like a Savannah Highmane on steroids. It is literally unplayable. Not like pre-KotFH Prince hype unplayable, like its not even possible in theory to build a Hunter deck using this card, and if you could build a no minion Hunter (you can't) this card still wouldn't be good.
Bonus: You get fucking wrecked by Psychic Scream if you play this. 2 Animal Companions? Nope, how about 1 because your opponent put all those shitty secret beasts back in your deck. Try harder next time to not queue into Priest.
hearthscan-bot · 3 points · Posted at 03:04:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 Mana - Deal 2 damage to a minion. If it survives, give it Poisonous.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
Gatekeeper1310 · 3 points · Posted at 03:23:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[Cobra Shot]] 3.0
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 03:24:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
5 Mana - Deal 3 damage to a minion and the enemy hero.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
UberEinstein99 · 2 points · Posted at 03:27:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You can’t even compare this to toxic arrow. I’ve played with toxic arrow. I put it in my meme deathrattle hunter deck, and it’s actually won me a few games. This card is on a level so bad that I’d choose purify over this for my hunter deck.
MustardLordOfDeath · 2 points · Posted at 03:47:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nah, at least toxic arrow is playable in certain situations. I can't even imagine how this card will EVER be playable in ANY situation.
EDIT: Well, maybe it could be good if you've fatigued yourself, and that would only ever happen in Control Hunter. The card is still a piece of trash.
mr10123 · 1 points · Posted at 06:52:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Toxic Arrow is a fair card. This is more like Purify, if Purify was actually given to Warrior at the same mana cost with the text "deal 1 damage to a friendly minion, draw a card".
Nevermind, it's even worse than that. At this point, might as well just print overcosted vanilla minions for Hunter like a 5 mana 4/5.
Tafts_Bathtub · 16 points · Posted at 03:08:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man, what an interesting concept - encouraging no-minion hunter builds. But why did the card have to be so anemic? Surely this could have been 5 mana for such a requirement.
aaninja64 · 8 points · Posted at 03:57:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even 5 mana would be pretty crap, a decent amount of the time, you'd be paying nearly double for a single Leokk
Tafts_Bathtub · 2 points · Posted at 04:06:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I would never play a card like this in a deck where it would whiff a decent amount of the time.
aaninja64 · 1 points · Posted at 04:07:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even with one minion (Thaurissan or Yogg, either way, you're missing out on the other plus Stitched Trackers), it's still too much of a risk, and you'd be playing a terribly hamstrung deck
Tafts_Bathtub · 1 points · Posted at 04:09:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Exactly, which is why you would probably not play any minions if you were ever going to play a card like this.
LameName95 · 0 points · Posted at 07:14:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I made a cool Hunter deck with only spells, emerald hive queen or whatever and arcane Giants that used hunters secrets and spells to summon minions and do a lot of damage. I wish I had yogg for it and a spell like this could almost be useful in it, but I feel like I would have to cut minions for it to be reliable and that would only make the deck worse.
Edit: could be insane in a refined spell hunter like mine with tracking for lethal to discard the minions in your deck and hopefully be blessed with a double Huffer.
nitrogene · 16 points · Posted at 03:24:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One Animal Companion (Animal Companion) - 3 Mana
Two Animal Companions (To My Side!) - 6 Mana
Three Animal Companions (Call of the Willd) - 9 Mana
oh yeah the 6 mana one requires no minions in ur deck cuz fuck u
DontYaGnome · 7 points · Posted at 03:08:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
inb4
“Opted out of (5) because it was too generic use, powerful in almost any game situation, and too good at something Hunters tend to lack.”
cyclecube · 7 points · Posted at 03:14:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
the sole purpose of this card is to beat the arthas fight?
phoenixmusicman · 1 points · Posted at 11:01:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But even then you run a few crucial minions...
optimistic_hsa · 9 points · Posted at 03:14:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't know what biyouxi did to blizzard, but it must've been really awful.
111AlaN111 · 2 points · Posted at 09:13:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They should have given this to toast
[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 03:28:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
assassin10 · 1 points · Posted at 03:44:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Better than having all the strongest cards be epic.
loadholt · 9 points · Posted at 03:33:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a fucking disgrace. They should be ashamed of themselves. I️ seriously hope this is an error and is meant to say summon 3 companions instead. If not, the team either has no idea how to design hunter cards or just don’t give 2 shits about the class.
How the duck can you print this card when you made the Hunter legendary a battlecry and deathrattle recruit. This is pathetic
Razul22 · 9 points · Posted at 07:22:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Words fail me. Did rexxar fuck Brodes mother or something?
Spideraxe30 · 25 points · Posted at 03:08:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I thought Hearthpwn was joking with us here, is this actually a real card because this is awful
TheMightyBellegar · 14 points · Posted at 03:26:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know that Blizzard plans their expansions far in advance, but damn does it feel terrible when the worst class in the game gets terrible cards like this while Priest gets amazing cards like a Hellfire with a 3/3 attached or a mass Recycle.
Prophet_of_Bob · 8 points · Posted at 05:39:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well, it doesn't really matter how far in advance they planned this, its shit no matter what the meta is like. It could have been made when huntertaker was OP and I still would not understand the thought process behind this card.
ApostleWyald · 7 points · Posted at 03:22:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Jesus Christ. A 6 mana animal companion that will never fit in any deck, not even the memeest yogg and load or the new legendary no beast shenanigans. Getting this in packs is actually insulting.
random_german_guy · 7 points · Posted at 04:10:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This may be the worst epic ever. Just take hunter and put a bullet in its head, stop the suffering. WTF Blizzard, are you fucking serious? Is this shit for real?
iShapeshift · 6 points · Posted at 04:20:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"UNBELIEVABLE
THIS DEV TEAM IS MAKING EVERYONE CANCEL THEIR PRE-ORDERS!
WANNA KNOW HOW?
JUST CLICK HERE!"
generalmill211 · 13 points · Posted at 03:04:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yikes
Dieeg · 6 points · Posted at 03:20:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No fucking way this is real, and if it is, WHAT THE FUCK
Dangarembga · 5 points · Posted at 03:29:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We complained about the cost of the game and now based blizzard deleted a whole class to reduce cost and people are still complaining?!
Blizzard really cant win!
yosoyelsteve · 5 points · Posted at 04:15:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this is it. This might be the card that finally makes me quit Hearthstone the second I open it. What in the actual fuck?
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 06:07:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I've logged over 2,000 wins as Rexxar so far, and I'm still refusing to give up dreams of Egg and Quest Hunter
Hang in there ;D
troop98 · 6 points · Posted at 04:22:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
http://www.hearthcards.net/cards/d107e751.png I already know what the new weapon will be
Chem1st · 5 points · Posted at 07:15:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow. Every person who allowed this card to pass along should be summarily fired from Team 5 and given some crayons to play with in the corner.
Yuri-Girl · 17 points · Posted at 04:02:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok. Just gonna throw a decklist out there. Probably bad, might be good, who knows.
2x Cat Trick
2x Explosive Trap
1x Freezing Trap
2x Snake Trap
2x Toxic Arrow
2x Venomstrike Trap
2x Animal Companion
2x Wandering Monster
2x Deadly Shot
2x Eaglehorn Bow
2x Emerald Spellstone
2x Kill Command
1x Deathstalker Rexxar
2x To My Side
2x Crushing Walls
2x Call of the Wild
This is the kind of card that makes me go "there has to be more cards enabling this coming later" because on paper the effect sucks, but a tokens only secret hunter might work.
SerellRosalia · 11 points · Posted at 05:13:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No point in To My Side when you could run Savannah Highmane instead. Not conditional, and still better
Jetz72 · 15 points · Posted at 07:25:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So this card is so bad that it's the first thing to cut from a deck built around it. That's actually kinda amazing.
yosoyelsteve · 4 points · Posted at 05:52:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I would swap Toxic Arrow for Dinomancy so you can buff all the minions you aren't allowed to play to make the deck work.
Kunaviech · 1 points · Posted at 08:27:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Then you draw Dinomancy after rexxar and have a dead card for the rest of the game.
Yuri-Girl · 1 points · Posted at 21:01:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Deathstalker Rexxar is already dead though.
DLOGD · 1 points · Posted at 15:01:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dinomancy buffs the Snakes you didn't get from Snake Trap because your opponent never attacked the minion you don't have.
plying_your_emotions · 2 points · Posted at 05:18:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lol, might be good? Where's your win condition, where's your board control, the f*** you gonna do against a mage or priest whose happy to sit and search for their win conditions while you play secrets.
Yuri-Girl · 2 points · Posted at 05:27:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Relax, I'm just throwing out a random list with what we have so far. I even prefaced "might be good" with "probably bad". You're welcome to try and improve on it and make a better deck that runs this card.
plying_your_emotions · 2 points · Posted at 05:39:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm angry because of this card and blizzard! I know I'm gonna see this EPIC POS when opening packs and know that I missed out on actual useful cards! WHY ISN'T THIS COMMON OR RARE?! WHY EPIC!?!?!?!??!?
BreakSage · 1 points · Posted at 15:56:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They tend to put the weird effects at epic rarity. I imagine it's partly so they'll rarely come up in arena.
Here's a list of epic cards. You can see how many never see play. People are complaining about this one, but at least it promotes a new archetype that'll have other cards revealed unlike cards like Blubber Baron, Wind-up Burglebot, or Leatherclad Hogleader.
People are saying that by putting this in the epic rarity slot, you're making the game more expensive.
But I've seen the same argument for good cards in the epic rarity slot. There's just no winning for Blizzard it seems.
plying_your_emotions · 1 points · Posted at 16:29:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't mind neutral epics being trash, they don't effect the power of any specific class. Also, neutral epics can be used by any class to experiment with, so even if it's bad for one class, some other class might find some minor or meme use for it. But Blizzard has no f***ing excuse for this garbage, this trash is locked into hunter and is pushing this pointless deck type. What's good about summoning minions via spells if they cost the same mana (OR MORE WITH A BS CONDITION) vs just playing a minion? No Blizzard has no excuse for this, there is "winning" for Blizzard if they thought this shit through. There are only 2 possible explanations for this card 1) the remaining hunter cards help create this "no minions" archtype or 2) 50% (or some other high percent) of the hearthstone player-base mainly plays hunter and blizzard wants to reduce that number by making the class worse.
Kunaviech · 1 points · Posted at 08:30:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Secret hunter without Cloaked Huntress 🤔
Neverino · 12 points · Posted at 03:03:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
so bad lol
TeamAquaAdminMatt · 10 points · Posted at 03:04:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
well that's just garbage
Suzakured · 10 points · Posted at 03:11:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Epic? Lul. This card is garbage
RedsManRick · 11 points · Posted at 04:36:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This better not show up in arena.
jnpg · 21 points · Posted at 03:04:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
the only way that this would be even SLIGHTLY redeemable would be if you could pick which ones to play. even then, it's too expensive.
MAYBE 5 mana?
not 6
Maddocktor · 30 points · Posted at 03:06:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At 4 this isn’t worth the downside
jnpg · 7 points · Posted at 03:09:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard better buff this some how. like;
6 mana summon an animal companion of your choice, two if you have no beasts in your deck
idk
KamikazePlatypus · 13 points · Posted at 03:15:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unfortunately they don't buff cards ever. So we're stuck with this shitty card that people are going to open 5 of and inevitably complain about. Fucking thanks, Blizzard.
CivilKobold · -2 points · Posted at 03:24:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I believe it is already written like you would choose the companion(and it still is crap.)
aaninja64 · 3 points · Posted at 03:55:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No Discover keyword, no choice, sadly
CivilKobold · 2 points · Posted at 06:59:59 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Then it is even worse than I thought.
DoctorWho1111 · 5 points · Posted at 03:08:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I could kinda see this played at 4 JUST to have more animal companions, but that is kinda a stretch
Sneebie · 9 points · Posted at 03:18:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal companions are only good because they're overstatted for their cost, though.
frostedWarlock · 1 points · Posted at 03:33:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
All of the Animal Companions are worth 4 mana (maybe slightly less). It would probably be run at that cost, since it's not like Hunter has a lot of great 4-drops to pick from.
Maddocktor · 1 points · Posted at 03:35:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
4 mana for a
Weaker yeti (now with taunt) Huff daddy Some bird wyrm
This card would only see play in decks where people met the condition (which would be Barnes into ysharaaj?)
frostedWarlock · 3 points · Posted at 03:38:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Misha is a Ironfur Grizzly with +1/1. Huffer is a Wolfrider with +1/1 and a Beast tag. Leokk is a Raid Leader with +0/2 and a Beast tag. They're all 3-mana minions that gain a mana's worth of stats and sometimes a beast Tag. They're all worth 4 mana.
Maddocktor · 2 points · Posted at 03:58:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m not denying they are worth 4 mana. Would you put into your hunter deck a misha if it cost 4?
frostedWarlock · 1 points · Posted at 05:08:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No but only because Houndmaster exists. I would run Huffer and possibly Leokk.
dragonitetrainer · 2 points · Posted at 03:31:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It doesn't say a random Companion, so I think it does let you choose
swiper33 · 2 points · Posted at 06:25:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think you can choose, [[Animal Companion]] says random.
flashsilver · 6 points · Posted at 03:12:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But why?
MustardLordOfDeath · 3 points · Posted at 03:56:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So we can be disappointed when we get an Epic from a pack.
ShamelessSoaDAShill · 1 points · Posted at 06:06:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Also, to make sure Rexxar doesn't scare all the potentially profitable noobs away
SomeStacheMan · 5 points · Posted at 03:13:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel bad for the person who got that is their card.
TurnOneYeti · 4 points · Posted at 04:07:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Worst card in hearthstone. Team 5 should be ashamed. They essentially doubled the mana cost of a card from the basic set and made it an epic to screw over players that unfortunately pull this out of packs. This is some EA level shit.
Soprohero · 5 points · Posted at 04:10:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this is the worst card in hearthstone history..., I’m bound to open 7 of them :(
jervis02 · 5 points · Posted at 04:34:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this fake?
[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 04:45:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
funny the art shows huffer and misha as if you won’t get double leokk every time
ZLangweenee · 11 points · Posted at 03:08:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Make a class that revolves around controlling the board with minions, then print this card. This is purify for hunter except it will never see play ever.
HinduHamma · 2 points · Posted at 05:28:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Purify you can see what they were getting at with silence priest..(all be it shit tier but it had a role in that silence archtype at least)
This? This shit right here? No role in ANYTHING except building a deck that's trying to lose
Neverino · 8 points · Posted at 03:04:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i prefer to play call of the wild instead of this garbage...
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:09:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
backinredd · 1 points · Posted at 03:15:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You at least know what you’re gonna get with call of the wild.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:33:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
backinredd · 1 points · Posted at 04:38:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nope. It’s random. Doesn’t say discover or choose.
Pledge__ · 1 points · Posted at 05:09:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
CotW is a decent card at the moment. Not a great card, but somewhat usable. Sort of the '32/33rd' kind of card for a deck.
This makes toxic arrow look good.
Nasluc · 7 points · Posted at 03:06:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Obligatory horrible epic card for hunter... I had faith in you blizzard but you not only destroyed my hopes for hunter this year but also printed 2
horrible epic cards for hunter not even one with a little usability. I will save my deathstalker rexxar but if this becames priest year after karazhan I REALLY SUGGEST team 5 to start printing good hunter cards next year or else Im done with hunter.
111AlaN111 · 2 points · Posted at 09:17:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wasnt crushing walls the terrible epic?
Nasluc · 2 points · Posted at 15:57:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Looks like santa saw we have been some nasty people control hunter lovers and we got two bad epics in one expansion
GarlicNerd · 9 points · Posted at 03:46:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Then your Priest opponent plays Psychic Scream, shuffling minions into your deck, thereby ruining your second To My Side.
KittenNoodleSoup · 4 points · Posted at 03:10:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
good guy blizzard, letting us avoid crafting hunter epics this exp
Hq3473 · 4 points · Posted at 03:22:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Emerald spell stone should have summoned more and more animal companions, and this abomination should have never been made.
111AlaN111 · 1 points · Posted at 09:22:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Emerald needs you to save at worst 4 secrets for each copy. Meanwhile, mage only needs you to play elementals, and priest to use spells, requirements that their most played decks already fulfill.
Its probably the hardest spellstone to complete and gives you a shitty reward.
[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 04:53:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly, fuck this game, I'm not spending any more money on packs for this xpac, I usually buy maybe 10-30 bucks over the length of the expansion, but after this bullshit no more, I only player 4 classes in order to net deck cards so I can have a full set with those classes, hunter being one of them but I'm done after this, last expansion hunter got dogshit useless epics that are way too high cost and don't have any synergy and go against the deck archetype and now look here again, they are actually encouraging people to use NO MINIONS IN A CLASS THAT RELIES ON MINIONS BECAUSE ALL YOU PRINT ARE DOG SHIT SPELLS FOR THIS CLASS, HONESTLY WHAT THE FUCK TEAM 5. Is this some sort of sick joke?
BrokenShipPro · 4 points · Posted at 05:03:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Disturbingly bad card
its8oGlock · 5 points · Posted at 05:20:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Anyone has an idea on what's the purpose behind this bullshit? I mean Team 5 is not stupid, they obviously know this card sucks ass but there must be a fucking reason to release this lol
lifearecool · 5 points · Posted at 07:23:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Call of the wild is 3 animal companions with no restrictions for liner mana. This doesn’t make sense at all. Why does the middle version have a restriction when the upper and lower end go together. This is some of the worst design ever in HS.
TheOvershear · 5 points · Posted at 07:34:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Im not spending a cent on this expansion untill this is removed. Fucking rediculous.
mr_narwhalz · 8 points · Posted at 03:03:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well maybe Barnes ysaarj hunter. That's it. Looks kinda bad...
A_Mazz_Ing · 15 points · Posted at 03:05:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That has minions in it.
mr_narwhalz · 2 points · Posted at 03:06:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You play this after playing Barnes, more of a joke because it really has no home.
WINDST0RM · 3 points · Posted at 03:11:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Animal Companion specifically mentions "summon a random beast companion."
Do you get to choose the companions you summon with this card since it doesnt say "random?"
CivilKobold · 3 points · Posted at 03:26:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That is what it looks like, but it is still bad.
DicksAhoy · 3 points · Posted at 03:15:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think I'm giving up with Hunter. The team simply doesn't want to give the class ANYTHING.
I hope sooner or later they print a cheap weapon for Hunter with Deathrattle: Concede to save us the time of playing this shit class.
yokkora · 2 points · Posted at 04:12:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Change that to a battlecry
j10oreo · 3 points · Posted at 03:23:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I probably have no one other than myself to blame for wanting to play the hunter class. I just assumed finding balance between the classes was going to be a thing. That's my fault.
OnePete7 · 3 points · Posted at 03:23:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
People are calling this card bad all over the thread when this will be the Dr Boom of the expansion and you’ll see a Barnes/Yshaarj Hunter archetype dominate the tier 1 or 2 and of course i’m kidding wtf is this card?
Tewks0620 · 3 points · Posted at 03:46:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm fairly certain this is the worst card ever made. Is this just a joke to bury hunters even more?
iShapeshift · 3 points · Posted at 03:59:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has to be, BY FAR, the worst card EVER in history of hearthstone.
SirDukeIII · 3 points · Posted at 04:00:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well that sells it. I wasn’t excited for this next expansion already. Now I’m considering just uninstalling the app and not looking back.
It’s that bad of a card
Pacify_ · 3 points · Posted at 04:04:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
??????????
calmingRespirator · 3 points · Posted at 04:04:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the actual fuck!???!???!???!!!???
Mlikesblue · 3 points · Posted at 04:05:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the fuck? It's already supposed to cost 6 mana for 2 animal companions. Load of trash.
ICUTrollin · 3 points · Posted at 04:06:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has got to be worse than everything else this expansion right? Like I'm not wrong here?
ProfessorNox · 3 points · Posted at 04:06:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tier 1, here we go.
Pacify_ · 1 points · Posted at 07:51:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Tier S, like druid and UI
SomberC-thun · 3 points · Posted at 04:25:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This just can't be real. It's priced the same as running two AC. I just can't believe it's real.
lightisbig · 3 points · Posted at 04:30:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
FUCK U TEAM5, pizza designer.
busse9 · 3 points · Posted at 04:37:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why couldn't it just have been summon a misha and a huffer?
Emi_Ibarazakiii · 3 points · Posted at 04:37:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No one would ever touch that at 4 mana... What were they thinking? Do they think secret-only hunter can work with what we got, seriously?
Does hunter even have 30 non-minion playable cards heh? What the hell.
unimeeppp · 3 points · Posted at 04:37:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You've got to be joking...
mhtom · 3 points · Posted at 04:38:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh my sides LUL
DemBeeZ · 3 points · Posted at 04:46:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The best part is everyone would play 2 savannah highmanes over a 0 restriction version of this card in midrange hunter decks anyway and blizzard shafts hunter anyway.
Tobyuoso · 3 points · Posted at 04:50:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Aaaaaaand there goes my pre-order. Refunding time
Scrimshank22 · 3 points · Posted at 05:02:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lol
ravjjjkkk · 3 points · Posted at 04:54:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If only it said 2 huffers
cavsalmostgotswept · 3 points · Posted at 04:54:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Seeing To My Side made me lose my side
Kryptic_Void · 3 points · Posted at 04:57:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stop Blizzard he’s already dead
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 04:59:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
More ranting: Isn't the value you get from running these "no duplicate" type cards supposed to be stronger than the normal cards? Animal companion cost 3 mana, you legit just printed a fucking epic card that has a horrible downside and in return summons 2 animal companions FOR THE SAME PRICE RATIO AS THE NORMAL CARD WITH NO DOWNSIDES. This only confirms that team 5 is just rank 20 and keeps losing to hunters, it's pathetic that these people are actually being paid to do this.
Scrimshank22 · 0 points · Posted at 05:00:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is not a no duplicates card. It's no minions
Meret123 · 3 points · Posted at 05:03:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
My prediction is this was call of the wild with condition but they got scared and decided to make it garbage. Small indie developer had no time for balancing I guess.
datasuit · 3 points · Posted at 05:08:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
tfw you paid for this
Jabpi · 3 points · Posted at 05:10:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok one useless epic card for hunter is a meme, but two is just that you hate the class
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 05:16:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh FFS Blizzard. Just because Hunter has some solid basic cards doesn't mean they have to get the shaft every single expansion.
Spac3bar_Official · 3 points · Posted at 05:25:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As someone who primarily plays hunter, this card is insulting. There isn't a way around it, this is the epitome of bad card design. There is no mana discount. This would never go in any hunter deck. I hope that this is the only card that uses this mechanic or I may end up abandoning my favorite class or even all of hearthstone.
OhHiBaf · 3 points · Posted at 05:29:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok Blizzard, facehunter hasn’t been a thing for years now... you can STOP FUCKING HUNTER IN THE ASS
Canvasch · 3 points · Posted at 05:39:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok, I'm trying to wrap my head around this. I'd imagine this exists because of synergy with recruit, the idea being that you probably will run through all the minions in your deck through a game. But even then, the value doesn't seem to be there. Who fuckin knows
rival22x · 3 points · Posted at 05:56:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I never ever give a shit about crappy cards but this one? This one is inexcusable. If the community wants to riot about something this is it. This NEEDS to be changed. This is an insult. It’s a card with an extremely difficult condition to meet and your reward for meeting said condition is... nothing! No matter how you spin it... this card is just a waste. It can never ever be good. It’s not even like Call of the Wild where you get three predetermined minions. It’s random! You could get two Leokks that will power up all of the zero minions you have in your deck. This card should be 3+3=6 but it’s 3+3=shit. Similar cards are the princes and Kazakus who all provide game warping changes for meeting their conditions, but this... this is just a joke. This is that card that you’re gonna open that makes you just go “god fucking dammit!” This is the equivalent to getting coal for Christmas. You’re gonna be spending money on getting possibly buying a card that hinders you if you try to play it! Not even purify was this bad! It found a use! But this? It’s not mana efficient, it’s not reliable, it’s weaker than its two counterpart cards, it forces you to play with an impossible deck that can never succeed, and it just plain fucking sucks! Edit: I apologize for the outburst. In the end its just a silly little card/mobile game and its not worth cussing about. What I just wrote is NO way to leave useful constructive feedback at all. I just feel like people rag on Team 5 so much, and all they do is prove to people that they should rag on them by printing cards like this. And I know Blizz is better than that! This card's worthlessness can easily be figured out by using simple grade school math, and Team 5 should be smarter than that. Not to mention this is literally the definition of throwing money away if you open a pack with this in it since it is just math-wise useless. This is just not the kind of card you want to be creating during a time where people criticize the cost of the game so much! And the deck that the card is asking you to build (zero minions) is pretty much impossible to make! Half the spells hunters have don't work without a target minion. It's a worse and very conditional version of CotW and AC, which aren't OP cards in the first place. It feels slapped together, extremely undertuned, and just feels like no thought was put into it, which is way below Blizzard's standards compared to their other polished games. I sincerely hope they realize how severely undertuned this card is and deliver a pre-expansion buff to it. Lower the mana cost to 3 or 4, or raise the reward to 3 minions. Anything would do!
Sandmanned · 3 points · Posted at 07:10:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
if they changed to summon 2 animal companions, or summon 3 if your deck has no minions it would be an easy way to make this card non-laughable
PS hire me blizz i need a job
Brrryyycccee · 3 points · Posted at 07:38:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this real? LMAO! This has to be a fucking joke.
AlbinoFoot · 5 points · Posted at 03:04:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Giving "Control tools" to hunter I see
Goldendragon55 · 2 points · Posted at 03:10:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why couldn’t this just summon 2 baseline and 3 with no minions?
MustardLordOfDeath · 2 points · Posted at 03:54:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly, then it would probably be playable. Two would be the same value per companion as Animal Companion and Call of the Wild, and 3 would be good if you were to somehow run out of minions as a Hunter.
Really, I think the only reason this exists is for people to hope not to get when they see an Epic in their pack.
iShapeshift · 2 points · Posted at 03:14:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't believe Hunter gets shit cards like this one, holy shit.
How much does T5 hate Hunter?
dead___fish · 2 points · Posted at 03:14:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is it a random animal companion though or can you pick?
jimusah · 2 points · Posted at 03:15:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Seems like a pretty terrible card unfortunately. Theres no upside in leaving out minions to get this effect when you're already overpaying for the effect.
Babeldude · 2 points · Posted at 03:17:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh, so they finally revealed the epic that I'll open 5 times.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:18:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Come ooooon at least let us discover them if it costs 6. Even without the "no minions" clause it's just okay. Smh give hunter some love
CivilKobold · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It seems to be written like you could discover them, still seems bad.
Rsilves · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card made me realize im playing since beta and i have never seen a hunter on fatigue... if you are out of minions on hunter you lost already
Taxouck · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Trump is gonna give this card minus 3 stars, there's no other rating possible
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:19:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I would complain about how Team 5 five are scared of giving hunter good cards, because casual rank 20 players hate hunter and their hero power, but I won't. It would be very hipocryte for my part, since two years ago when I started playing, I said how face hunter was cancer and such. So everyone (both players and devs) and everything around put hunter in a awkard position.
The good news are that hunter still have the cheap decks, since this card is doesn't belong to a current (or theorycrafted) hunter archetype. So not worth crafting.
Edit: Grammar fixes.
scotems · 1 points · Posted at 03:45:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
oof
Kasurin_Makise · 2 points · Posted at 03:26:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this real? This has to be a joke.
Toonlinkuser · 2 points · Posted at 03:28:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is embarrasing
reddit_abdullah · 2 points · Posted at 03:29:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The absolute joke of the set
reddit_abdullah · 2 points · Posted at 03:32:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m interested in the devs justification for this card ... poor poor rexxar
unverifiedson · 2 points · Posted at 03:33:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wtf? for the harsh condition of having no minions all u get is 6 mana for 2 animal companions
bladestorm91 · 2 points · Posted at 03:37:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can we please petition to have this changed to a simple "Summon two animal companions"? You know, an actual "decent" card? Right now it's just too insulting to even have it sitting in our collections.
darkblade1200 · 2 points · Posted at 03:45:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Guys let's appreciate the art! It's such... Actually really bad art... Fuck...
mwieckhorst · 2 points · Posted at 03:46:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Found the epic I'll be opening 20 times!
Chronomancy · 2 points · Posted at 03:57:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To my sides, where are you?
FourArmz · 2 points · Posted at 03:58:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has to be a mistake.
devsoi · 2 points · Posted at 04:00:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is my favorite class, i wait every expansion for something to make the class competitive....I just dont understand why the refuse to make hunter even remotely playable! hopefully the hunter weapon is OP to make up for this bullshit!
MAKE REXXAR GREAT AGAIN!
assassingao · 2 points · Posted at 04:00:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"To my side" hahahahahaha damn my sides
Maybe someone will find a way to make it work, or make a meme decks with 6 animal companion cards.
This might actually work with DK Rexxar/lock n'load... Or else there just had to be a reliable way to pull your minions off with recruit.
SomboSteel · 2 points · Posted at 04:01:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Perfect Arena card
MorningPants · 2 points · Posted at 04:02:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this card MIGHT not be as terrible as it looks. Getting two companions means you will get guaranteed immediate impact in 5 charge damage, a 5/4 Taunt, or charge and Taunt. If there wasn't the deck building restriction, it might just be an auto include.
But that restriction is really rough, and the card is really bad. I remember hearing one of the devs talking about how much they love Yogg-n-load, now this card makes it a 'deck to try'. Would it be too good at 5 mana in that deck? Probably, but the deck will still suck. If they print more 'no minion' synergy cards, TMS may someday find a home.
WhatsGoodDuder · 2 points · Posted at 04:08:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What in tarnation?!?
Flatbar · 2 points · Posted at 04:14:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There's gotta be some kind of deck that could use this card. There's just gotta be... Why else would they print this? I... just have to believe it has a use somewhere, possibly... in some deck... somewhere
TheGingr · 2 points · Posted at 04:16:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
After looking at this card for like 15 minutes and trying to wrap my brain around what this card could possibly be for, I just realized it just lets you play a control hunter deck that runs essentially 12 animal companions.
2 animal companions, 2 to my side, 2 call of the wild for a grand total of 12 animal companions.
I'm not saying that this card is good, or even fucking playable. But that's probably the deck that team 5 had in mind when printing this card. But that in mind, this still might be the worst card ever printed unless hunter gets some absolutely disgusting and game breaking spells. But it won't, since all the gross spells went to priest. Looking at you, psychic scream.
Mordin___Solus · 2 points · Posted at 04:16:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Team 5 running out of ideas.
DoeSeeDoe123 · 2 points · Posted at 04:17:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What an absolute fucking joke.
blknbluberee · 2 points · Posted at 04:19:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man why wasn't this card at least 5 mana?! It's literally only a fair cost if you have no minions and fair sucks.
BetterNerfIrelia32 · 2 points · Posted at 04:19:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
???????
Mugiwaraboii · 2 points · Posted at 04:20:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is pure garbage. I feel genuinely triggered over this shit, it's borderline infuriating. How can other classes be rewarded with great spells and minions, or at the very least playable ones, while the Hunter class is constantly given trash after complete trash?
You could play two animal companions in the same turn, for the same effect, without sacrificing your whole deck. I mean this has to be a joke right, or has blizzard just given up on the class at this point.
liontan · 2 points · Posted at 04:23:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Haha, nice April Fool's joke
checks date
Oh fuck it is not April 1st
jared2294 · 2 points · Posted at 04:32:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Who the fuck invented, who the fuck approved and who the fuck didn’t double check this card? This is beyond trash tier
Ling3309 · 2 points · Posted at 04:34:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It’s times like this I really wish I could have been at the meeting where this card was created and given the go-ahead to be added to the game. I would LOVE to hear their reasoning behind adding this card. I can’t possibly imagine why they would do this.
lightisbig · 2 points · Posted at 04:35:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think purify and this trash is designed by one idiot, or one idiot team.
Brucedx · 2 points · Posted at 04:36:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2013/02/incredulous.gif
Karl_Marx_ · 2 points · Posted at 04:53:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the purify for Hunter.
not_silly · 2 points · Posted at 04:58:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter weapon must be something like at the end of your turn add a "to my side" to your hand.
lane4 · 2 points · Posted at 04:58:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And they printed Spreading Plague at 5 mana...
leopoldshark · 2 points · Posted at 05:04:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Perfect card for Quest Hunter. Play Carnassa, shuffle 15 raptors into your Deck. Then play Hemet Jungle Hunter to destroy the raptors so you can play this!
STAR-PLATlNUM · 2 points · Posted at 05:06:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
nice file name,
but this legit? No way this can be real
SerellRosalia · 2 points · Posted at 05:11:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So you make a deck that just so happens to have no minions. You need something on 6. Do you run To My Side, or Savannah Highmane?
Epicly_Curious · 2 points · Posted at 05:18:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the fuck.
ChampionBryce · 2 points · Posted at 05:19:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
HAHAHAHA HUNTER! AHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahah
alkortes · 2 points · Posted at 05:21:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I thought it was a shitpost... But it's real? I honestly cannot believe. And it's an epic too?! worst than purify
AleXstheDark · 2 points · Posted at 05:25:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Holy shit this is terrible...
Loharo · 2 points · Posted at 05:35:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The art on this is... questionable. Looks like a more colourful Wallace and Gromit.
clickmeok · 2 points · Posted at 05:39:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Seeing this card makes me want no duplicate epics even more.
starcrap2 · 2 points · Posted at 05:40:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
WTF is this? I thought Dragonhatcher is the worst card in this expansion, but they managed to one-up themselves.
rival22x · 2 points · Posted at 05:47:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm personally fucking insulted.
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 05:54:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This should have said summon 2 animal companions or 3 if you have no minions. Where is the pay off? Even the version I suggested is dubious at best but at least there is a reward for not playing highmane.
Husskies · 2 points · Posted at 06:02:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I always try to be the guy who tries to understand cards and what kind of deck they could be good or at least interesting in but oh god... This is just bad. In every sense of the word bad.
Natoba · 2 points · Posted at 06:27:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not that I think it saves the card, but I think you choose which animal companion you summon, maybe you can summon two huffers?
Skeith253 · 1 points · Posted at 07:50:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ohhh wait a minute! No I think most people are assuming its random. I just read the card txt for Animal companion And this card says just summon. You probably do get to choose.
TBlackbear467 · 2 points · Posted at 06:31:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This hurts my soul..
NakedNick_ballin · 2 points · Posted at 06:48:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So fucking glad I haven't played this game in ages haha
The_Legionare · 2 points · Posted at 07:00:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
the single worst hunter card ever printed. animal companion but double the cost and nothing else.
The_Legionare · 2 points · Posted at 07:01:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and an epic too. might as well read "gain 100 dust"
AbsurdityCentral · 1 points · Posted at 07:19:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Put it like that and the card seems most effective.
j8sadm632b · 2 points · Posted at 07:03:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Somebody who preordered is going to open six of these and literally commit suicide. Why the fuck is this an epic? Why is it a card at all?
Joseph Anderson has a great review of Hearthstone and in it he says he strongly suspects that Blizzard doesn't understand their own game, and I think it's nigh-impossible to say that he's wrong after seeing this. I think it would have been hard to say beforehand as well, but come ON.
Edit: The only way this ever makes sense is if one of the unrevealed Hunter cards is something like "Draw your deck"
Chiponyasu · 2 points · Posted at 07:05:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I want to say this card is just 400 dust, but it's so shitty that it only gives 5 dust when disenchanted.
WindowsXD · 2 points · Posted at 07:05:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
actual troll dev team
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 07:06:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this card a joke?
86com · 2 points · Posted at 07:06:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I honestly don't know what they were thinking. Even power level aside, this doesn't make too much sense. Maybe there are some lore reasons?
It clearly has nothing to do with kobolds or catacombs. Or dungeons and dragons.
Maybe it's something along the lines of "I hunt alone, I bring no one to my hunt, the beasts just help me when I call for them"? Even then it's kind of a stretch.
Amokmorg · 2 points · Posted at 07:06:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
6 mana huffer or "shit deck" 6 mana 2 huffers. wtf with this card design....
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 07:11:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can someone give me a reason this exists?
Like what else could they release to make this not shit
thekoven · 2 points · Posted at 07:11:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
but... why?
taxiwax · 2 points · Posted at 07:14:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is like Purify, but it's actually not possible to make this card good.
TBNecksnapper · 2 points · Posted at 07:19:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
With blizzards logic, for another three mana and if you put no spells either you should get three animal companions.
seikuu · 2 points · Posted at 07:22:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess it's for lock 'n load hunter, but that deck was absolute trash even when call of the wild was 8 mana, and it still used a few minions like king's elek, azure drake, thalnos, etc for cycle and spell damage. I'm also bothered that they're printing cards for wild when they very clearly don't give a shit about that format.
Feltzy · 2 points · Posted at 07:29:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the most unrealistic condition for a conditional card ever printed
dnscarlet · 2 points · Posted at 07:31:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is officially the most hated class. I just don't get it anymore. You could instead stop printing cards for Hunter, it would be the same.
Zeetch · 2 points · Posted at 07:32:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow what a shit card
Cheesebutt69 · 2 points · Posted at 07:41:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THis should be three mana holy moly did they screw this up.
Xingua92 · 2 points · Posted at 07:46:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Serious talk here. Why is this card a summon? They are rolling in this new recruit mechanic first of all. Hunter relies on minion heavy decks for the most part. It's a 6 Mana that you play when? To actually get the two beasts. A beast Hunter deck runs a shit ton of minions, how can this even be accomplished??
Why can't it be a recruit card first of all because that actually puts the minion in play and it can be something like recruit an X Mana minion/beast. Players can work a strategy around Mana cost of minion and when the card is best played as such. It can give the hunter the damage needed to go face and end because recruit puts the minion in play. I'm sure there are so many other alternatives but this just seems so out of place
LordBpicks · 2 points · Posted at 07:47:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is literal garbage I don’t think it would see play at 3 mana even
smilinmaniag · 2 points · Posted at 07:48:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ayy Blizzard class balancing strikes again LEL
HoyHoi · 2 points · Posted at 07:51:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least its an epic right guys??
Coziestpigeon2 · 2 points · Posted at 07:55:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is there any class in HS thatbcood manage with no minions?
dota2nub · 1 points · Posted at 09:18:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe some weird freeze Mage in wild, but even then you probably want card draw minions, doomsayers and either Alex or Tony
soomieHS · 2 points · Posted at 07:56:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card MUST cost 4 mana. Even at 4 mana this would be a complete trash.
Sudija33 · 2 points · Posted at 07:59:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm trying to comfort my self by imagining that the hunter weapon is so OP and "no minion" centered that this card makes sence in that deck. I mean this is BEYOND terrible in the current hunter state. If Hunter weapon would be so insane to justify running no minions, than MAYBE this card would be in it.
TehFlamingChicken · 2 points · Posted at 08:14:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow, im speechless. Is this real?!
hakillha · 2 points · Posted at 08:17:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Beyond stupidity?
Indie__Guy · 2 points · Posted at 08:18:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If I open 4 of these im gonna blow up bens twitter until he blocks me
FryChikN · 2 points · Posted at 08:18:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It sucks that since blizz is too lazy to balance hero powers, hunter gets the shit end of the stick :/
starryey3d · 2 points · Posted at 08:21:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Guys you are being too harsh, how about this card in aren.. ok nevermind buck flizzard
Nico777 · 2 points · Posted at 08:49:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lmao that's proof they're doing it on purpose, if any proof was still really needed. I'm out, fuck you team 5.
Aztok · 2 points · Posted at 09:02:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh good! I was looking for a reason to not go back to hearthstone! Glad to see they’re printing unplayable shit like this, now I have a deterrent to buying packs or supporting these bandits.
HeyApples · 2 points · Posted at 09:22:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is beyond Purify levels of insulting to the fanbase.
JelliusMaximus · 2 points · Posted at 09:38:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I found the epic that I will get 11 copies of at the pack opening day :)
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 10:18:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Finally an epic I don't want. Lol
Myztyrio · 2 points · Posted at 10:26:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If they want to print a conditional animal companion spell, it should be something like: 6 mana Summon an animal companion. If there are no minions in your hand, summon two. If there are no minions in your deck, this costs (0).
Original_Raptor · 2 points · Posted at 10:46:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
is it as bad as it looks?
Lord_Cynical · 2 points · Posted at 12:34:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this beats poison blade....for the worst epic a class has ever gotten.
linguotgr · 2 points · Posted at 13:13:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fantastic card! It's gonna improve the hunter vs burgle rogue matchup significantly.
DeBonoCommuni · 2 points · Posted at 13:44:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alright, enough is enough. Wake me up fo the next expansion. This one is just too shitty for me.
LzTangeL · 2 points · Posted at 14:07:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I didnt think we could get any worse than toxic arrow and crusing walls but here we are
Waldorg · 2 points · Posted at 14:08:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fuck off Team 5, just fuck off
Waldorg · 2 points · Posted at 14:10:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the worst card ever printed, it's a giant fuck you to the hunter class.
FUCK YOU TEAM 5
Fatal1ty_93_RUS · 2 points · Posted at 14:15:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So they just used the Animal Companion voiceline as a card name and then reprinted the original with a higher manacost?
This is the laziest I have seen Blizzard being since late 2014
Crazyflames · 2 points · Posted at 14:30:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will craft a golden Millhouse if To My Side! does not see play in a tiered deck.
claytonsong · 2 points · Posted at 14:36:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wait... it would be good without the restriction but I don’t think in any ways oppressive...
JasonUncensored · 2 points · Posted at 14:57:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ben Brode's response: "Some people like to win with bad cards!"
No, really.
OtherJesus · 2 points · Posted at 14:57:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the actual fuck is this. This card will weight codes to be the most common Epic when opening packs. Expect 5 of these if you pre-ordered.
Sooooo fucking I stuck to my guns and didn't pre order.
Granpa0 · 2 points · Posted at 15:53:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter continues to get the massive shaft. What does Hunter need? Removal. What does Hunter get? This shit.
liukenga · 2 points · Posted at 16:44:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I am playing hunter. My deck has no minions. My only purpose in life is to summon TWO animal companions. My opponent is priest. I finally draw To My Side! My opponent plays a spell which puts cards into my deck. All of which are minions...
...
...
I say nothing. To my opponent I simply look like I am deciding on what to play. But secretly I am screaming inside. I am screaming so hard, as if it were loud enough that someone would hear me. But alas, my lips do not move, and no sound is to be heard. I try to lift my hand to scroll over to the "well played" emote, but my hand goes numb... I just let the rope burn away and watch as my hp reduces to 0... All that I can think to myself is perhaps one day, one person will listen to psychic scream and hear my sorrow... today is not that day...
Blackbirds21 · 2 points · Posted at 18:21:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card needs to be changed to having no minions in your hand instead of your deck to save itself.... this is going to get so much bad press from youtubers and pros literally starting today.
Emokore · 2 points · Posted at 18:29:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why print this? This is garbage. Look at Ultimate Infestation, as an example of an epic class spell. Now look again at this trash. Please reconsider printing this...
rageinspires · 2 points · Posted at 18:38:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Im just glad this is an epic
theguz4l · 2 points · Posted at 19:03:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THIS is exactly why they need to implement 'no triplicate epics' when you open packs. No one should have to open more than 2 of this piece of shit.
ignorediacritics · 2 points · Posted at 20:25:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They should just replace the ordinary Animal Companion with this and set the mana cost to 3.
throwawayabutt · 2 points · Posted at 21:01:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
this is the best evidence I've ever seen for believing there is no god
LeFrogKid · 2 points · Posted at 21:12:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Literally the worst hearthstone card ever printed. This card pisses me off on multiple levels.
Theworldhere247 · 2 points · Posted at 21:16:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a joke, right? What is this garbage u/bbrode? Did an intern design another card again?
Scttysnyder · 1 points · Posted at 21:53:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
ben brode knows hhow much how trash this set is he wont even comment here lol what a frickin chode
We are pulling an EA everyone cancel your preorders and vote with your wallets we will not expect these expanison fillers now its not just pack fillers when the whole xpac aint worth the cash!
imnotanumber42 · 4 points · Posted at 03:04:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Art is weird to me. Card art doesn't usually have heros in them right?
DoctorWho1111 · 12 points · Posted at 03:05:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The normal Animal Companion card has Rexxar in it, and Mirror Image has images of Jaina
dremor454 · 6 points · Posted at 03:13:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
and Blizzard also has Jaina
KamikazePlatypus · 4 points · Posted at 03:13:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is mind numbingly bad. I refuse to believe this was printed for any reason other than to get people to buy more packs.
Tiger_Fist · 5 points · Posted at 03:59:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unless there's some insane hunter spells coming out this is one of the worst cards in hearthstone..
PushEmma · 5 points · Posted at 03:06:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The weapon better summons a King Krush each turn to make this Spell Hunter work... This isn't even sinergy with the legendary... What has Rexxar done to deserve this?
OPkillurself · 2 points · Posted at 04:24:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
u/bbrode you got some explaining to do, as is stands Hunter is absolute trash in KaC
iSay7 · 2 points · Posted at 03:06:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They really don't want Hunter to become a good class.
TheBigLman · 1 points · Posted at 03:05:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is one of those cards that will have synergy next expansion.
Edit: On a serious note, if I open one of the hunter epics, Im getting off for the rest of the day and will open my packs later.
Toastboaster · 3 points · Posted at 03:07:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
unless they get all the best control spells in the game (which won't happen because blizz wouldn't allow that), I don't see it ever happening. Even if you get it to work it's still a bad card
luizjaq · 2 points · Posted at 03:30:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
fuck you blizzard
TheBigLman · 1 points · Posted at 03:08:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unleash the hounds and infest synergy. We did it boys.
clichetopia · 1 points · Posted at 03:11:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
lol blizzard running out of ideas
backinredd · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They’re running out of shits to give for hunter.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:14:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:01:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not as long rank 20 players or new players (like me some years ago) keep complaining... So RIP Hunter...
DebugLifeChoseMe · 1 points · Posted at 03:14:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Filename checks out.
Lohtric · 1 points · Posted at 03:15:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
YIKES
how-doesthis-work · 1 points · Posted at 03:15:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lock and load support? That's really the only hunter card that wants you to run a bunch of spells right?
Granted we've seen them test the waters for ideas or themes in a previous expansion (ferry man and dreamer from MSG fore shadowed the rogue/druid quests) maybe there will be more spell hunter support? Which sounds like a bad thing ATM.
Edit: oh god the hunter legendary weapon is going to be spell based isn't it?
Alarid · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's garbage. It should have cost four to even be remotely viable, because there is a lot that needs to fundamentally change about how we play Hunter to make it worth running.
jaycshah99 · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If it was summon all 3 animal companions it would be garbage right? Like how do you WIN a game without any minions? Maybe some sort of barnes-y'shaarj deck but its useless when you don't draw barnes, unlike barnes warlock which atleast has renounce darkness as its backup plan, and its still a meme deck. Why does the hunter epic slot get wasted like this!!!!!!!! this is so fustrating for hunter players! Seriously try making a non minion deck as hunter... this would have to be fill your board with random animal companions and maybe cost 10 mana and maybe there would be a meme deck revolving around this?
KoookyKiwi · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this real life?
teokun123 · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wtf. That no minion on deck. Wtf Blizzard
gnerkus · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard is hiding something with these Hunter cards...
Hq3473 · 1 points · Posted at 03:16:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't get it- why people hate this so much!
6 mana- summon two 4/2 chargers!!!! It's basically a better Leroy!
/s
mrradica · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Cards like this make me mad. Why purposely make a card intentionally under-powered. The deck constraints alone might not even make it worth it at 5 mana but at 6 it's weaker than highmane and forces you to not use highmane.
Ausphin · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
YIKES. If this is what they want, archetype will need a lot more support. lots.
Calphurnious · 3 points · Posted at 03:54:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You'll get your support over the course of 3 expansions and when you finally do they rotate it out to wild.
CMDR_Kava · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just what I always wanted, another Cobra Shot.
Taxouck · 1 points · Posted at 03:17:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The fuck? This is too terrible to even be a meme card.
Randomguy188 · 1 points · Posted at 03:18:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
when you have to make pack filler but you run out of ideas
hartygs · 1 points · Posted at 03:18:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is very strong against mill decks :p
GeorgeMacaa · 1 points · Posted at 03:18:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not even a mana reduction compared to two Animal Companion? This is goddamn Hunter, make its at least 4 or 5 to get it viable. Holy shit, just cause we can THEORETICALLY summon 12 Animal Companions, 4 3/3 Wolfs, and a couple of Secret animals and 1/1 does not mean we can keep both them and Rexxar alive long enough to do jack shit. I refuse to believe Team 5 made this card and thought "This card is viable." This is about as meme as you can get, if you want to make every game like the Hunter vs Lich King fight.
GlebRyabov · 1 points · Posted at 03:19:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As a Hunter, I hate this card. 1 Companion costs 3 mana, 3 cost 9 mana. But 2 cost 6 mana and only if your deck has no minions! I can't imagine a hunter deck without ANY minions.
GDerkon · 1 points · Posted at 03:19:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I like how HearthPwn goes directy to "this is garbage" and Hearthead goes "New epic card for hunter!" on twitter...
Goldendragon55 · 1 points · Posted at 03:20:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Only our commons can save us now.
polloyumyum · 1 points · Posted at 03:20:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm struggling to see how this will ever see play...
Does this card receive a nomination for worst card of the set? There has to be something else yet to be revealed that makes anything about this card make sense.
UberEinstein99 · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Honestly, I aways try to see the best in cards, and this is the first time I was completey unable to come up with anything good about this card. I even came up with something for purify when it was revealed. This card definetly seems like the worst card of the set.
Edit: worst card in hearthstone history. Does not even have meme potential.
Edit 2: I just changed my mind. It miiiight have sooommme potential.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I agree with the potential. I've built some creature-less hunter decks before (or running barnes and y'sharjj) and it's surprisingly doable to keep a board with very few actual creatures in your deck as hunter. I definitely think 2 animal companions for 6 mana is strong, but the reward isn't quite huge enough given the drawback. I still won't be disappointed to open it up though!
Then again, I CRAFTED glacial mysteries for a secret deck, so my bar is pretty low.
UberEinstein99 · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You seem to play some very meme decks.
I like you.
PM_yoursmalltits · 1 points · Posted at 03:21:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter isn't allowed to have nice things
UberEinstein99 · 1 points · Posted at 03:32:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Okay this card is bad, but hunter has gotten some good cards like the spellstone and Kathrena this expansion.
PM_yoursmalltits · 1 points · Posted at 03:33:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Those are good, but only if hunter got some cards to make control viable. So far theyve gotten nada
dankmemespipedreams · 1 points · Posted at 03:21:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are you fucking joking?
juanvaldezmyhero · 1 points · Posted at 03:22:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's really bad. It would honestly be fine if they just removed the restriction f no minions in deck.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:22:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
they really badly want to not give cards to aggro hunter
Manlyburger · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm pretty sure this is a horrendous card.
Hunter fun times.
catch22milo · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has got to be a translation issue.
rozorb · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the hell? I see no archetype for hunter to support this card, I have no words for this.
UberEinstein99 · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard obviously realized how unfair Hunter’s matchup against the Lich King is, and printed this put to help us finally get the Arthas Skin.
THANKS BLIZZ!!!!! Now I can continue to farm wins from hunters, but this time as Arthas instead of Uther!
en2nui · 1 points · Posted at 03:24:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How does a card like this get past testing, assuming Blizzard test plays all cards they create? I would love to hear their justification and process behind this card creation.
boringdude00 · 1 points · Posted at 03:24:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This can't possibly be correct. It's gotta be summon 2/summon 3 if or something. It's not even memeable otherwise. You could theoretically do a Secret Hunter with no small minions, but no minions at all? Your win condition is Animal Companions and maybe drawing Deathstaker Rexxar?
Pupe_Fiasco · 1 points · Posted at 03:27:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't see this turning out to be real. It's too bad and the art looks a bit wonk to me.
Killinger_ · 1 points · Posted at 03:27:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I usually lurk but I logged in just to say that this card is a piece of shit, shouldn't have been made, and Blizzard should be ashamed of themselves.
WunderOwl · 1 points · Posted at 03:28:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
An epic, with marginal at best uses. I look forward to unpacking 6 of these.
grapeintensity · 1 points · Posted at 03:28:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
is this a fucking joke
p8ntball_hobo · 1 points · Posted at 03:30:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Not every hit can be a home run
InspectaaDeck · 1 points · Posted at 03:30:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Would be mildly interesting if you got to choose. This is a very blatant example of them watering down the epic pool with unplayable trash. My only question is, why did hunter have to get 2 trash epics in the same expansion?
Im-Not-Convinced · 1 points · Posted at 03:30:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Worst card I’ve ever seen. Get a hunter deck with zero minions and for that you get to cast two animal companion’s at full cost
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:30:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card does look complete shit at first glance, but notice on Animal Companion it says 'summon a RANDOM beast companion'. At no point here does it say that the beast summoned is random. (however even if you get to choose one the card is still real bad)
antodouv · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
finally a card to beat the lich king /s
yummygem · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way i can see this card having potential is if hunter has some kind of card that hasn't been revealed yet that is "If you control all the animal companions then do X broken effect" sort of like shaman has with that totem card. If no such card exists then this is legit worse than purify.
Soulsek · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We have not seen the Hunter legendary Weapon yet ? Maybe it reduces spell cost by 2?
13Witnesses · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As long it’s always Huffer it’s ok /s
sunnyhvar1992 · 1 points · Posted at 03:31:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I refuse to believe that this card isn't mistranslated.
This card actually says "Summon 2 animal companions is your board has no minions"
It has to.
THE_ACER_ · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They make cards like this to dilute the epic card pool
Pro1136 · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess it's for barnes y'sharaj hunter
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why are they giving mage low cost aggro cards and giving hunter high costed hot garbage at the same time? I know the card designers have never booted heartstone in their lifetime, but they could at least think before printing a card. (sorry for bad english)
deevee12 · 1 points · Posted at 03:34:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
One star, now and in the future
Fogfish420 · 1 points · Posted at 03:35:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wait... what? This is the ahittiest card I've ever seen. And I'm taking into account captain's parrot here. Wtf is this?
muglecruzle · 1 points · Posted at 03:35:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card will only fit one archetype, if it is even an archetype. Why blizz
Ignatius256 · 1 points · Posted at 03:35:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The card art is so bad, there's no way this is real. It looks like it's just completely awful as a card as well.
Ruptured-Kidney · 1 points · Posted at 03:36:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ez dust
PG-Noob · 1 points · Posted at 03:36:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Man I so wish this was printed in warlock. Since in warlock you can at least cycle it through Malchezar's imp.
Elestris · 1 points · Posted at 03:36:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this a joke?
Like, the fuck? I just... I don't understand. I understood freeze shaman and purity priest, but... what?
zegota · 1 points · Posted at 03:37:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why play a highmane on turn 6 when you can get two Leokks???
WhatEvery1sThinking · 1 points · Posted at 03:37:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean...spell hunter is a low cost and fun archetype to mess around with...but this card is garbage, and an epic to boot. This serves no purposes other than devaluing pack opening and trying to get people to spend (more) money to get the epics they actually want
DageWasTaken · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What does the dev team against Hunter? Jesus, these Hunter cards are not only bad, they're also all over the shop. Their legendary is a recruit but their spellstone is for traps.
shadow0wolf0 · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
A part of me wants this to be the prince 2 of the set... I have some hope at least. No this is trash
ajpiano2 · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At least its an epic so I don't have to worry about getting it!
Thalz1 · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You really can't print cards like this and not at least give epics triplicate protection. Gonna be great spending your hard earned money/gold on packs and to get 3-4 of these bad boys out of the 10-15 epics you're going to open. Hell, opening two of them is bad enough, but then at least your suffering will be over.
mofaspombanabalaia · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"What if we get a mediocre basic card then release an exact copy that costs double"
If this was "discover and summon an animal companion, if you have no minions in your deck discover two" then maybe it would have some kind of purpose
RuggedCalculator · 1 points · Posted at 03:40:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thought this was the top community card of the week and I was still disappointed
JLamp391 · 1 points · Posted at 03:40:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well now they're just screwing with us.
hahakickkick · 1 points · Posted at 03:40:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wtf is this card? stop killing hunter!
OfMurlocsAndMen · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only logic for creating this card that I can think of is if there is some crazy synergy elsewhere in the set.
Maybe the Hunter Legendary weapon will be something crazy like a 2 mana 4/4 with the text "Remove all minions from your deck".
Sinkie12 · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I said it before, they genuinely believe hunter is very powerful because of the rank 25 winrates they see. As long as they continue to interpret data like that, hunter will not get their 'turn' of being at tier 1, probably not even tier 2.
DaHaLoJeDi · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well this is certainly... a... card?
PeteZBM · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So if you have no minions in your deck it's just a normally stated card??? I mean I appreciate the idea but, no.
MakataDoji · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Quite LITERALLY the worst card to EVER be printed. Lorewalker Cho has more of a home in a hunter deck than this ungodly abomination. I've bitched like 10 times in the past week about the caliber of hunter cards thus far but secretly hoped the last 5 would make up for it but holy FUCK if this is what we have to look forward to the class is utterly fucked.
I am predicting our legendary weapon will be some shitty attempt at control instead of the gladiator's longbow v2.0 that the class desperately needs.
Sir_Oshi · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You all are missing it. Blizzard has heard our cries of the game getting too expensive. Hunter is getting shit tier high rarity cards to ensure cheap budget decks remain the way to play going forward.
AgentDoubleU · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The Hunter Legendary from this expansion utilizes the new Recruit mechanic to pull Beasts, which are minions, from your deck.
What?!
MrDollSteak · 1 points · Posted at 03:42:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I didn't think they could print a card that would be worse for Hunter than Crushing Walls but uh... Blizzard finds a way
Tudor36 · 1 points · Posted at 03:42:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If this is one of the few epics I pack I will be real pissed
Treozukik · 1 points · Posted at 03:42:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard must really hate Hunter because this card is garbage and has absolutely no support or synergy with any conceivable Hunter Archetype.
FinesseChampion · 1 points · Posted at 03:43:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know people always say "wait until the expansion comes out it might see some play!" But this card is just shit.
Tom450 · 1 points · Posted at 03:43:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ah yes, this will work really well with the new Hunter weapon:
4 mana
5/1
When you attack with this weapon, recruit all your minions.
TriforceofCake · 1 points · Posted at 03:45:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok, being devil’s advocate here, secret hunter was once an actual thing, and it ran like 2 minions. Maybe it’ll happen in wild?
majormind329 · 1 points · Posted at 03:45:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the card that this subreddit will be 100% wrong on because most of them never played Yogg N Load or Highroll (Barnes/Ysharrj) Hunter. Might be end up being Renounce tier, but this definitely isn't a Moorabi.
Can definitely see running a skeleton crew of recruit minions that tutor each other out, can kind of see why Crushing Walls was printed (even though I still think it's awful). Will have to wait for the weapon/neutral set release to pass real judgment.
YoungestOldGuy · 1 points · Posted at 03:46:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I really thought this was a joke thread based on the card image. The image looks really basic, the wording is strange and the card is horrible.
But everybody in the comments thinks it's real, so it must be.
I don't know what to say...
swiftstratos · 1 points · Posted at 03:46:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Should rework hunter if you're going to give them constant trash because of the fundamentals of the class.
Chaeix · 1 points · Posted at 03:47:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the card reveal equivalent of getting blue balls
HainesGT · 1 points · Posted at 03:48:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe theres an insane synergy card to be revealed? But you would think they would reveal it first.
Why would a hunter deck ever play no minions?
TheAwesomePi314 · 1 points · Posted at 03:49:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
blizz why I wanted to play hunter more this expansion what the heck man
SlayerGM · 1 points · Posted at 03:49:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ummmmmmmm....Blizzard... are you ok?
TriforceofCake · 1 points · Posted at 03:49:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...yup, they’re gonna HoF Highmane.
cookiemx · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can call it very safely. This card is the worst card in this expansion if not in the whole game.
MoonbeamsDeluxe · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I’m so glad they printed this counter to Rin! I was really worried.
But seriously right now there are zero playable hunter epics and with the release of KnC that will not change so that’s cool.
Also this is great for the matchup vs rogue! I’d much rather they burgle this than king crush!
bluemirror · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
YOGG GONNA GET REVERTED BOIS
__Avaritia · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Isn't the wording such that you can choose your Animal Companion to summon? Because the actual Animal Companion has the word 'random' in it, so by comparison this one wouldn't be random?
sleepcomaa · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
all I see is 100 dust
pilobacon · 1 points · Posted at 03:52:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stop! Stop! He's already dead.
lanayaya · 1 points · Posted at 03:53:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Was this revealed during a stream? What did the guy even said about the card?
Could you imagine Blizzard giving you this card to reveal? What there's even to say about this except "Yeah, this looks pretty bad".
FlazeHOTS · 1 points · Posted at 03:53:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
How did this even get printed....
Cinderheart · 1 points · Posted at 03:53:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...This needs to also include: "Give all minions you have somehow manged to get into play +3/+3".
MustachedCorn · 1 points · Posted at 03:54:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
100% chance I will open at least 5 of these.
errolstafford · 1 points · Posted at 03:54:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
A year ago I thought Rogues were getting the short end of the stick with the Shadow Rager. But now... now I see it's hunters. I'm so sorry.
MustachedCorn · 1 points · Posted at 03:54:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
100% chance I will open at least 5 of these.
Popsychblog · 1 points · Posted at 03:54:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So here's the question: is this worse than Toxic Arrow?
I think so, but I'm open to hearing otherwise
Muggalion · 1 points · Posted at 03:58:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Definitely worse toxic arrow has some combos or uses this is almost none and when it works it's not even good
Popsychblog · 2 points · Posted at 04:20:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're not looking at the upside enough. For instance, this card reduces the cost of Hearthstone by representing one less card you'd want to collect under any circumstance
Muggalion · 1 points · Posted at 04:29:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Until you pull 7 of them what interactive gameplay
MustachedCorn · 1 points · Posted at 03:54:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
100% chance I will open at least 5 of these.
NinjaJedi17 · 1 points · Posted at 04:01:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is it just tradition now that Hunter gets a garbage, not even meme-worthy epic every set?
ProfessorDusty · 1 points · Posted at 04:01:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh good. They’re buffing hunter in his match VS the Lich king.
wrightpj · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is so bad I’m not 100% sure it isn’t fake. Like holy shit this card is bad. How do you even make a deck for this work?
Thurn42 · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe the reason they're killing the Hunter class is their way to push the deathrattle archetype...
xXdimmitsarasXx · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh shit someone's about to knock highmane off that 6 mana spot
Isn't it better to run 2 highmanes as your only minions instead of a minionless deck with 2 of these
yokkora · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Will never EVER see play. If it does, I am crafting THREE golden ones.
KarmaKill23 · 1 points · Posted at 04:03:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This makes me terrified to see the hunter weapon...
PocketTaco · 1 points · Posted at 04:06:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Having no minions in your deck is such an impossible downside compared to having no 2/3/4 Mana cards or only having one copy of a card in your deck like Reno, and the upside actually makes it playable instead of game-swinging. Wow.
Saber66 · 1 points · Posted at 04:07:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
DOUBLE HUFFER GO FACE
rofreg123 · 1 points · Posted at 04:08:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has to be fake...
AngelWarfare · 1 points · Posted at 04:08:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way I see this card being good is if the Hunter Legendary Weapon says something like: Every time you play a spell summon a beast of the same cost. Because there are not a lot of 6 Mana beasts. You play the weapon, play this card, and then get two animal companions and a free Savannah Highmane. That is the only way me thinks.
Edit: Also makes sense why Hunter would get a 7-cost spell.
notyourdadsdad · 1 points · Posted at 04:08:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
this shit feels like they aren't even trying
Malurth · 1 points · Posted at 04:09:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Inb4 hunter legendary weapon:
3 mana 3/1
If your deck has no minions, after you cast a spell, summon a random beast of that Cost.
Deathrattle: Re-equip this weapon.
....otherwise this card is the worst card in the existence of HS.
6pt022x10tothe23 · 1 points · Posted at 04:11:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unpopular opinion: this is the sleeper card of the set and will be the cornerstone of the most oppressive deck in the K&C meta.
I mean, it's not my opinion... but it sure seems like it would be an unpopular one.
B3GG · 1 points · Posted at 04:15:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow... rip hunter WTF I can't even
Green_Spectrum · 1 points · Posted at 04:17:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm confused AF. Why would do you need to put "summon one animal companion" on this card? In what situation would you ever want to summon one animal companion for 6 mana? Why is this even a choice?
LordFaptoguise · 1 points · Posted at 04:17:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Now, this card would actually be fantastic in a really slow fatigue/mill deck.
...Which Hunter cannot pull off.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:18:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
this cant be real must be an error in the translation. where is /umdonais to explain himself about this pile of shit lol
slumper · 1 points · Posted at 04:18:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Grammar is difficult for small indie companies.
theAmberFang · 1 points · Posted at 04:19:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think the idea behind this is to have a few minions in your deck that you pull out with Recruit effects. But summoning two Animal Companions for 6 would probably be about par for constructed play: good, but competes with Highmane, so I hardly think it would be an auto-include or anything. The restriction is absolutely ridiculous.
Delekii · 1 points · Posted at 04:19:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Looks at date
Nope. Not april first?
What's going on?
Whitefang123 · 1 points · Posted at 04:20:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Could it be a missprint? Maybe it was meant to say "Summon an Animal Companion ,or 2 MORE if your deck has no minions"
Der_Pacifist · 1 points · Posted at 04:22:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way this is good is if the Hunter Weapon is something along the lines of "Recruit a Beast"
Then when you exhaust your deck of beasts this can...wait...no it's still shit
goldboyy45 · 1 points · Posted at 04:22:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
NOT ONE OF YOU MENTIONED HOW BAD THIS IS IN ARENA, SHAME ON ALL OF YOU.
TurkusGyrational · 1 points · Posted at 04:23:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It makes more sense to build a mage deck with no minions in the hopes of getting this off Deck of Wonders than it does to build a hunter deck with the same condition.
tacosfalafels · 1 points · Posted at 04:25:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
who makes these cards? LOL
Teath123 · 1 points · Posted at 04:25:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can usually spitball Blizzard's design choices and figure out where they're coming from, but ignoring its viability, what a horrendous design. A class that's about getting beasts on to the board, a class that they've also pushed deathrattle synergy on, they're just randomly giving them a card about no minion usage??? What? Comparing this to when Call of the Wild was originally 8 mana is fucking LAUGHABLE, even while its at 9 now.
Frostfright · 1 points · Posted at 04:26:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even old pre-nerf Yogg n Load wouldn't have run this. Let that sink in.
Would this even see play at 4 mana? This is ball of spiders 2.0. Literally 2 or more mana overcosted. I love Blizzard so much.
AxoIotls · 1 points · Posted at 04:26:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
stop it rexxar's already dead wtf
FrogZone · 1 points · Posted at 04:26:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm ready to unpack 8 of these on release day! (Preparing for the worst is good for your blood pressure.)
GoldenGoshawk · 1 points · Posted at 04:27:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dont worry guys, this is all in preperation for the hunter weapon...
Companionator: 10 mana 1 1 weapon.
Battlecry: Destroy all minions in your deck
Deathrattle: Summon all animal companions that died this game.
Its gonna be great, trust me.
Nanglaur · 1 points · Posted at 04:28:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is as good as Purify.... Holy sht.
Crine1 · 1 points · Posted at 04:28:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I only see one possibility for thinking it was okay to print a card like this: Hunter is about to get some crazy-good, almost game-breaking, kind of card that has an effect with the same requirement. In which case, this would just serve as a reasonable option to fill out card slots to get that deck to 30.
23JRojas · 1 points · Posted at 04:29:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Im honestly in shock this wasnt a custom hearthstone card i almost skipped over it thinking it was gunna be a fan made card with some other bad synergy but wow this is so bad, i mean knowing blizzard theyre going to try to push this with some cool (but probably horribly bad) synergy cards but idk whyd theyd ever print a card like this
cgmcnama · 1 points · Posted at 04:30:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This must have been nerfed in the balancing stage. But this is just horrible. I bet it was probably Summon 2 Animal Companions, or 3 if your deck has no minions. That way you get a better Call of the Wild.
They shouldn't print a card this bad. Redesign it. Having no minions is a huge deck restriction and the payoff is not even that good.
ManicHS · 1 points · Posted at 04:31:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Guys guys, this is clearly a Yogg nerf... right?
assassin10 · 2 points · Posted at 04:35:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's not killing you or your Yogg. Seems like a buff.
Marraphy · 1 points · Posted at 04:31:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
(Devil's advocate...) Is there any way it could be viable in a minion-less Hunter deck that uses Animal Companion, To My Side, Call of the Wild, Unleash the Hounds, Wandering Monster, Emerald Spellstone, and Deathstalker Rexxar in lieu of minions? Hunter is the only class I can think of besides Priest that has lots of spells that summon minions
iwanttosaysmth · 1 points · Posted at 04:32:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It seems like many card of this set were printed having mindall the random effect: cast a random spell, or summon minion for 8-mana or evolve and so on. I think that this card is a prime example of this way creating cards
Szylepiel · 1 points · Posted at 04:32:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
With such a huge restriction, why does it not cost four?
Con45 · 1 points · Posted at 04:35:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The hunter legendary weapon has got to be a beast summoning version of Atiesh right? That also doesn’t lose durability after every spell.
Would make this card and Crushing Walls make a lot more sense.
projectwar · 2 points · Posted at 04:47:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
5 mana, 0/2 legendary hunter weapon. Whenever you summon an animal companion, summon king krush too.
Johnny-Hollywood · 1 points · Posted at 04:37:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well you know, they have to dilute the pool of Epics. If they were all build around and necessary, someone might accuse Blizzard of being greedy.
Plus, you don't get it, this is the card that foreshadows the next expansion's mechanic of having no minions. It'll be an auto-include in 6 months, obviously.
Jokes aside, this should probably cost 5. Maybe 4.
UltraValkyrie · 1 points · Posted at 04:44:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
...is this even real? How is this real? Team5 know Hunter is garbage right now, right? Why does this exist??? It's not even interesting, just complete shit!
I_LOVE_WAMUU · 1 points · Posted at 04:44:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is hilariously bad
not_silly · 1 points · Posted at 04:44:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is there something powerful about this card that my brain can't understand or is this terrible?
styr · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THIS actually costs 6 mana?!? You have got to be kidding me, Blizzard. This is just terrible in a class built around having tons of minions! Hunter cards are a flat out a joke this expansion.
Tobyuoso · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh look, now we got another card that our money will get wasted on!
MeowGeneral · 1 points · Posted at 04:46:41 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is trash in 90% of circumstances. The ONLY way it could see play is in spell yogg hunter. This provided you actually draw yogg. Being that draw dependant, leaving behind the core ideals of hunter, and relying on CONTROL hunter has to be one of the worst cards. Even when you get the two animal companions there isn't any mana advantage over just playing two animal companions.
JumbuckJoel · 1 points · Posted at 04:47:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Spell DK Hunter
KetchupIV · 1 points · Posted at 04:51:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Classic hunter epic, shitty as hell
ZORK258 · 1 points · Posted at 04:54:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They should hotfix it to be discover but I still don't think that would be enough
Sandmanned · 1 points · Posted at 04:54:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wat
sloxman · 1 points · Posted at 04:55:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alright, everyone. Grab your pitchforks. It's time to burn some houses down.
haiku-bot1 · 2 points · Posted at 04:55:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alright everyone
Grab your pitchforks It's time to
burn some houses down
-sloxman
I do not see all comments, so I cannot detect all haikus | blacklistme | info
sloxman · 1 points · Posted at 06:22:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good bot is unexpected.
xGearsOfToastx · 1 points · Posted at 04:55:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card should be called, "My sides!! xD!!!".
Hunter's class identity is officially just memes.
ajree210 · 1 points · Posted at 04:57:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow. I'd love to hear the reasoning from T5 behind this one. Yikes.
KryptikCyanide · 1 points · Posted at 04:59:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
For secret hunter?
SloppyinSeattle · 1 points · Posted at 05:01:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter is the new meme class. I thought only Warlock got cards this bad.
13pts35sec · 1 points · Posted at 05:02:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There's gotta be a mistake lol
vsully360 · 1 points · Posted at 05:06:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There must be a way for hunter to generate this card.
TheManWood · 1 points · Posted at 05:07:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
As a Hunter player I feel... Let Down.
FlyBoyG · 1 points · Posted at 05:07:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe Blizzard just doesn't want us to play Hunter in the next set. It seems that way from the past couple sets. Why not continue the trend?
EDIT: OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I get it. They made this to help people beat the Lich king fight in solo adventure. Seems like the only use for the card.
JelloBisexual · 1 points · Posted at 05:11:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That is insultingly bad
dfuelleman · 1 points · Posted at 05:12:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They should just change it from your deck to your board and maybe it would be viable. Still arguably worse than just animal companion.
yoda_bong420 · 1 points · Posted at 05:13:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think what this shows us is that the hunter hero power massively limits design space within the class. It's consistent, puts an auto clock on the match and is extremely aggressive. Blizzard must be afraid to compliment it with cards that might actually enhance hunters ability to rush players down.
monopopo2761 · 1 points · Posted at 05:14:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Haha i get it! You add these to your deck so when preist steals cards from your deck, it grabs this garbage!
AggnogPOE · 1 points · Posted at 05:15:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The hunter meme is getting boring. Its going from an insult to pure melancholy. I dont even play hunter and these cards still hurt to see.
JuanCarlosTheGreat · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would be unlikely for this to see play even if it had no condition, it's like if they made it so that you needed to have no spells in your deck for mistcaller to activate.
Qazitory · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This better not appear in arena...
monomers · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why print for the weakest class, you always do this team 5 what complete idiots.
shadowgengar97 · 1 points · Posted at 05:16:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only good thing about this card is the art
Merkdat · 1 points · Posted at 05:17:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Only way I could see this being played is if hunter gets more recruit support that's not minion based then using this after you get out your big boys for some decent damage and board presence. That's not gonna happen with the current support though, only time will tell.
HZCZhao · 1 points · Posted at 05:20:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think I can see uses for this. Let's say your deck is full of recruit a minion cards, and you can quickly draw out all your minions out of your deck. You then can play this card as your finisher. But it's still pretty difficult to use this card though
monomers · 1 points · Posted at 05:21:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hearthstone is far to expensive of a game to print totally useless cards. This is a complete scam.
ChampionBryce · 1 points · Posted at 05:21:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This seems like as good a reason as any to start buffing cards, Blizzard!
pimpwilly · 1 points · Posted at 05:23:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has to be a translation error, it has to be summon 2 if you have no minions on board. That fits the theme at least.
bofffa · 1 points · Posted at 05:23:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
hunter OMEGALUL
Glancealot · 1 points · Posted at 05:23:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why do people rush to rate a card without seeing al the cards first? Could be a good card in a new archetype!
3wayfish · 1 points · Posted at 05:24:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even worse considering this essentially takes up the spot of a usable epic from card unpackings.
Morris_Moe_Szyslak · 1 points · Posted at 05:25:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When I first saw this in my feed l thought I was custom hearthstone not the real thing.
meDrifter · 1 points · Posted at 05:26:23 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this card is pretty good actually
spidercousin · 1 points · Posted at 05:30:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just a suggestion. Maybe this card would fit into a high cost minion deck only that used recruit to get them out and when you run out you have DK rexxar and this card that can keep getting you cards to play
kobraa00011 · 1 points · Posted at 05:31:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is a joke right?
Azustorm · 1 points · Posted at 05:31:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
ok nice shitpost. now show me the real reveal
chAceofSpades · 1 points · Posted at 05:32:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is going to be sick in my Togwaggle hunter
BickFluzzard123 · 1 points · Posted at 05:33:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why do they even bother printing this garbage? Seriously, this is a non-card, even the activated version is worse than [[Saronite Chain Gang]] . How can anyone competent think even for a second this card has a purpose or a reason to exist. While priest got two OP cards.
Seriously, their design process and balancing is so dumb.
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 05:33:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
4 Mana 2/3 - Taunt Battlecry: Summon a copy of this minion.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
Chm_Albert_Wesker · 1 points · Posted at 05:34:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
s
Yoshidaru666 · 1 points · Posted at 05:35:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ummmmm okay then...
potatoelemental · 1 points · Posted at 05:37:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
can't wait for every epic i open to be this
Rocomet · 1 points · Posted at 05:43:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So they push for hunter to have big strong minions for recruit and now they are like, nah fuck that idea just put some spells together
Rocomet · 1 points · Posted at 05:45:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hey look it's purify 2.0
FuDog007 · 1 points · Posted at 05:46:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oof.
"Summon 100 Arcane Dust, or 400 if this card is Golden"
plknz · 1 points · Posted at 05:47:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe you could do something with Hemet, but to what end?
wridf · 1 points · Posted at 05:48:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would work in the Barnes+Y'shaarj+28 spells I use in rank 20 wild.
Koovies · 1 points · Posted at 05:52:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow that's incredibly bad. Even though it will always be two huffers
wizards_only · 1 points · Posted at 05:52:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So, I just opened a pack of K&C and it just had 100 dust in it. Weird, huh?
spkdanknugs · 1 points · Posted at 05:53:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Everyone's hating but this card is perfect for getting bodies on board without needing minions in my wild Barnes-Maly deck
Urejo_GG · 1 points · Posted at 05:55:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card was printed for the lich king fight
WHYYYYY LIZZARD
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 05:56:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
BLIZZARD CHOOSE ONE FOR FUCKS SAKE
Prohamen · 1 points · Posted at 06:17:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
yo really wtf Blizzard
talk about antisynergy
jacktheknife1180 · 1 points · Posted at 05:58:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So I’m going to safely assume that the hunter legendary weapon is a 3 mana 0/3 that “whenever you cast a spell, summon a beast of that cost.”
Literally the only way this card is worth anything...
Respecs · 1 points · Posted at 06:05:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe it summons different companions?!?! Like a Big Huffer 6/3 charge or Sweet Leokk 4/8 +2 attack?
Rsilves · 1 points · Posted at 06:06:21 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I just realized the true power of this card. This no minion hunter is the perfect counter ro minion based mage secrets like mirror image or the new fire rune. The hunter is gonna still lose but at least they cant use those secrets /s
Dawnfried · 1 points · Posted at 06:06:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Oh, look. Another epic I'll hate pulling, and never get the good ones.
jonnymilba · 1 points · Posted at 06:07:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I remember when Purify came out. Those were the days. Back when Blizzard cared about making bad cards.
Oguumash · 1 points · Posted at 06:11:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That card doesn't exist.
slumpmouse · 1 points · Posted at 06:12:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is shit but to be quite honest I don't really care if Rexxar gets flushed down the toilet at this point.
Deucer22 · 1 points · Posted at 06:14:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wtf
CatsGoBark · 1 points · Posted at 06:14:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the actual fuck.
There is literally no upside to this card. AT BEST, it's 2 [[Animal Companion]]s for the price of... 2 animal companions.
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 06:15:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
3 Mana - Summon a random Beast Companion.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
Prohamen · 1 points · Posted at 06:16:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
you get to run min 4 animal companions in your deck! At best 6! Yay are we having fun yet?
HueHueJimmyRustler · 1 points · Posted at 06:14:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This and crushing walls. It's like blizzard hates hunter or something
tigersbloodftw · 1 points · Posted at 06:15:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think there are going to be some good common recruit cards (synergize with deathrattle?) for hunter to be released (none so far at this point) and also some neutral recruit cards with and there may be an archetype of hunter deck that draws most minions out of the deck through recruit making this spell somewhat viable.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:17:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
RIP any chance of face hunter cards now
Carbideninja · 1 points · Posted at 06:18:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So, a deck with no minions? For .. 2 companions?
Is this a serious card?
marcusmorga · 1 points · Posted at 06:20:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We need more tools like this. Like a secret that deals 6 damage to face if your opponent plays a card for 5 mana or more.
Or a spell that removes a random card from your opponents hand.
Or a spell that gives your hero a scent mechanic. For one turn, bypass stealth and immunity.
Hunter needs tools, not shitty minions. Hunter has to be able to hunt. Traps, lures, sht like that.
Saerah4 · 1 points · Posted at 06:20:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
are there any reveal stream on this card?
i really want to see how the host talk about this card.
"hello guys welcome to my stream and today i'll reveal an epic hunter card that, uh hmmm nevermind thanks for watching"
SmiteVVhirl · 1 points · Posted at 06:20:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's funny, the only thing that actually confuses me about this is that even if you have no minions in your deck, the card still costs the same as 2 animal companions. Why not make it like 5 or 4? By every metric, if you're going to make a highly restrictive card with a mediocre effect... you should at least make it cheap.
swiper33 · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard are you fucking kidding me? You really think Hunter is the class to give awful meme cards to right now?
OBRkenobi · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fuckin... Fucking what?
Fuck me.
MisterMetal · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Who ever designed this card should be fired. Blizzard really needs to start firing the designers.
brianbezn · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let's say you build a deck around this card, you can realistically build a deck with 3 minions (cloaked huntresses and putricide).
First, are two animal companions even that good in that deck? The face damage with charge is not that good, you won't have a lot of minions to buff with leokk, and misha is good as pseudo healing, but a 4/4 on turn 6 won't do much.
Second, you will still find yourself not drawing any of those 3 minions and have an atrocious 6 mana card, there is a reason highlander decks usually run not even 1 duplicate, there will be times where a minion will be deep into your deck and hunter spells provide no card draw.
Third, why not build a deck without restrictions and run highmane instead? well, there is no reason not to. Maybe, the deck you are trying to fit this card in does not even want to run highmane, less a worse version of it.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:23:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this has to have some yet-unrevealed synergy.
Companion support?
Heavy recruit mechanic to flood every minion early-game?
Big spells like Mage?
There's gotta be something.
avunaos · 0 points · Posted at 06:34:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
there's not, and there will not be. can't they just print a bad card and end it there? XD no point looking for any positivity
TooSlow79 · 1 points · Posted at 06:24:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
And now we have purify for hunters.
Chineselegolas · 1 points · Posted at 06:26:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
At 4 mana I'd consider running it. At 6... wow. So I'm looking forward to seeing what they give hunter in 2018 when they pull a shaman/priest and catapult the class to tier 1.
thardoc · 1 points · Posted at 06:29:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You can't even argue it's a 'just for fun' card, the effect isn't interesting in any real way. I didn't think it could get this much worse than Purify.
avunaos · 1 points · Posted at 06:36:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel really bad for the guy who had to reveal this card.
"Other streamers got to reveal meta-defining decks and I got... this... :'( "
Dakobo · 1 points · Posted at 06:39:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you could choose which companions you can summon this card wouldn’t be too bad. Emerald stone into “to my side” on curve would be pretty sweet. Yes I know the board will be cleared most of the time after you play an emerald stone, but for the rare times you are able to pull off a greater emerald stone into two huffers or leok combination its going to feel good. Going to wait and see the rest of the cards to make final judgement.
leonertheboner · 1 points · Posted at 06:39:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Usually I roam this sub and call people out for making assumptions too early... but now.... I just don't even know anymore
SaltFueled · 1 points · Posted at 06:39:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When I unpack this kind of shit I understand why hearthstone is truly expensive.
VolcanonX · 1 points · Posted at 06:40:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
6 Mana Summon 2 Huffers? PLEASE NERF!
Oh Wait a minute....
Jack_Sinn · 1 points · Posted at 06:41:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alrighty boys, looks like we're going to get the first intentional buff to a card in hearstone history
MornarPopaj · 1 points · Posted at 06:43:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Pretty good card for the brawl where you summon random minion after each spell. I would disentchant hearthstone if i pull this epic 6 times like furnecefire collosus last time!
xNuts · 1 points · Posted at 06:53:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Please don't be in my packs !!!
CreepyStickGuy · 1 points · Posted at 06:55:20 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
?
awake283 · 1 points · Posted at 06:55:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's the worst card I've ever seen.
philbegger · 1 points · Posted at 06:57:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You don’t have to run zero minions in your deck to get value from this card. You can use recruit to pull what minions you have from your deck into play and then this card’s condition is active.
BestOneHandedNA · 1 points · Posted at 06:58:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If this was 5 mana... it would still be bad. That's fucking ridiculous
Mrrandom314159 · 1 points · Posted at 07:00:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what.
AbsurdityCentral · 1 points · Posted at 07:01:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, at least make it a 5 cost card. At least don't make it cost double.
SomeGuyCommentin · 1 points · Posted at 07:02:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter legendary weapon: "Exchange every minion in your deck with animal companion"
harry10ph · 1 points · Posted at 07:06:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Way to waste great card art.
ApeInDrapes · 1 points · Posted at 07:08:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Speculation: Legendary hunter weapon: if you control all beast companions you win the game
jailbreak · 1 points · Posted at 07:08:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just wanted to point out that the recruit mechanic removes the minions in question from your deck - so it is in fact possible to play this relatively consistently in a deck with minions if you have enough recruit cards. Doesn’t make the card good by any means, but it’s less impossible to play than it initially looks like.
MustachedCorn · 1 points · Posted at 07:08:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think all of you are seriously underestimating this card. This card can potentially summon 2 leokks to buff the 0 other minions you have in your deck! That is so insane I think this will be my day one 2x golden craft.
butterisgoodHD · 1 points · Posted at 07:09:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
not gonna say that card is shit but that card is shit
GorillaGrey · 1 points · Posted at 07:10:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will say this. Hunter has a lot of spells and uhh... Weapons... That you can include in your Hunter deck. Whenever I make generic Hunter deck, it's usually a slight bit heavier on non-minions than minions. Maybe, the idea isn't to play this specifically on curve, but rather after you have recruited all your minions out of your deck? That's the only way I can see this going. Assuming you've drawn at least 5 minions by turn 6, if you've used tracking and burned one or two, and recruited 3-4, you're deck is almost out of minions. Soon you will have no more minions in your deck, making this card exactly 1 for 1 valuable. Not more valuable than it should be for having a prerequisite, and definitely less valuable than say, a lot of most things. But in THIS situation, where you have recruited, drawn, or burned all your minions out towards the end of midgame, you could theoretically use this card. However, at this stage you would probably be using the 9 Mana requirement free version to try and finish up....
Pwnage_Peanut · 1 points · Posted at 07:14:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Prediction: Blizzard printed a card that when played together with To my Side, it will create a combo so powerful that it will push Hunter to Tier 0.
Shadeless_Lamp · 1 points · Posted at 07:19:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
King Togwaggle synergy though. Let's go, parasite hunter.
ChunkyMoose · 1 points · Posted at 07:20:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well... it doesn't say random like companion. Maybe you get to choose?
jjaekkak · 1 points · Posted at 07:33:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I think this is going to be incredibly clunky at first in a spell focused hunter, especially since currently secret hunter has cloaked huntress, putricide, and yogg. And because of hunters shit draw I would include stitched trackers. Hunters secret synergy is all minion based. I’m torn because on the one hand with minions you would never be able to play this on curve but maybe that’s not the point. If control hunter ends up actually getting the tools it needs, you can stall and wear down your opponent until you draw the last minion, or play it out of desperation for a face hit or taunt.
This seems like something that might work better after the next rotation happens. Yogg fades away along with cloaked huntress, the only minion secret hunter might need is putricide.
This just seems like it would be so much better if failing to meet the condition reduced it to 4 mana.
Idk, clearly just a nerf to burgle rogue.
LuciferHex · 1 points · Posted at 07:41:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You know what the best part about this card is? That it will never be made better. EVER.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 07:44:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card obviously sucks right now, but it's not irredeemably bad. If ever a hunter deck emerges that actively doesn't want to play minions anyway, because of other, as-yet-printed cards that also explicitly incentivize a minion-less deck, this would be a fine inclusion in a deck like that.
dota2nub · 1 points · Posted at 09:19:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No, in that deck it would still be bad
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:22:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why? To be perfectly clear, I'm talking about a deck that would, by its very nature, not be interested in running minions anyway, so the spell would always summon two ACs without fail, at no cost to the deck's overall game plan.
dota2nub · 1 points · Posted at 09:28:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It would still be just 2 animal companions for 6 mana. That's too expensive and you won't have many minions. This means your opponent's hand will be fat with removal.
Even in a deck without minions, replacing this with Highmane would make it better.
Khronosian · 1 points · Posted at 08:05:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What if some kind of Supreme Reno Hunter takes over the meta entirely?
The princes, Reno, this thing... Like, gee whiz this is theoretically absurd.
twister55555 · 1 points · Posted at 08:15:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Unpopular opinion: I'm gonna wait for the full expansion reveal before I put this card into the hall of shame, theres just no way they printed this card without a few others things to go with it..
kimvais · 1 points · Posted at 08:28:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok, looks like they had to print the milhouse manastorm of epics...
This is guaranteed to be in every 10th of your K&C packs.
DaftmanZeus · 1 points · Posted at 08:31:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wonder why the discover mechanic is so prevalent but on this card it was missed.
The 6 mana slot is against savannah highmane... soooooo yeah this card is not really on the menu as long highmane is on the table.
willarz1 · 1 points · Posted at 08:32:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Could this be the worst card ever printed?
not_silly · 1 points · Posted at 08:34:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are epics supposed to be shit? (recent trend in hearthstone)
not_silly · 1 points · Posted at 08:35:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I am actually fine with huntet not getting any cards this expansion rather than this.
Thatanas · 1 points · Posted at 08:40:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If a deck like Yogg and Load was still around, this might have seen play. Too bad it no longer is around.
sidwitit · 1 points · Posted at 08:41:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Huge hunter class fan , I’m completely baffled by this card . I saw this while driving home, drove 30mins coming up with ideas why blizzard wi.... never mind long story short this card sucks !!!!
Sir_Septimus · 1 points · Posted at 08:42:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i guess you can try to play 2 copies of call of the wild and this along with rexxar and hemet in some kind of heavier midrange deck tht finishes the job with build-a-beast, highmanes and huffer spam.
Supremacygg · 1 points · Posted at 08:47:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean, not that Hunter ever wants to play past turn 6, if a game ever went long, this could actually be decent late in the game? MAYBE?
Omegawop · 1 points · Posted at 08:50:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card should cost 4 OR summon 2 companions with 2 more if the conditions are met. Hell, even it did that AND cost 4 it might be too weak. What were they smoking when they came up with this trashola?
sidwitit · 1 points · Posted at 08:52:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So you do get to choose the animal companion you want, it won’t be random . I can actually see this get play it will need more synergy but I see it happening . It’s a cool archetype if they push it . Some more secrets , beast generating spells . Works good with DK to make minions
Erubos · 1 points · Posted at 08:55:56 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Nice 100 dust reveal
dota2nub · 1 points · Posted at 09:14:51 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You can't even dust it anymore because that means you'll get more of them in packs
DrixDrax · 1 points · Posted at 09:00:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean i WANT epics to be bad...but holy shit. I actually feel bad for this card
possum-kingdom · 1 points · Posted at 09:04:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm so glad I didn't preorder!
PlayerNine · 1 points · Posted at 09:05:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It doesn't say random, I noticed. I don't know if being able to pick one would make it any more viable though.
Ayahuasc0re · 1 points · Posted at 09:06:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Please tell me this is not real. Someone?
Ultrasonicc · 1 points · Posted at 09:06:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i bet thats going to be only epic i will open this expansion
ellipsoid314 · 1 points · Posted at 09:08:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Think I found a way to make this reasonable: What if another card says “when you cast a spell, recruit a minion with the same cost”. Then this becomes a way to get your highmane out and cast animal companion for free with it. Could even be the other way around where playing a minion casts a spell.
dota2nub · 1 points · Posted at 09:13:22 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fuck Blizzard for this. This takes up an epic slot! Wtf?!
EpicSabretooth · 1 points · Posted at 09:14:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Noobs get fucked by Hunter, the whole Hearthstone Hunter playerbase gets fucked every expansion because of it. Blizzard is visibly scared to give Hunter decent cards, because at lower ranks Hunter is good for some reason.
Spyxz · 1 points · Posted at 09:17:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The only way this is can even see play (at all, in meme decks) is if it was fill your battlefield with beast companions and even then it is so horribly bad in exchange for having no minions.
Xzanos · 1 points · Posted at 09:19:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Holy hell! I didn't think hunter was getting a worse epic than toxic arrow. Blizzard always has a way to surprise me.
RandomWeirdo · 1 points · Posted at 09:23:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is worse than purify...
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:25:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Inb4 blizzard adds another animal companion so it's a 1/4
dennyghost · 1 points · Posted at 09:29:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Someone will get Psychic scream from packs, someone will get this. I hope im not the latter one.
p4v07 · 1 points · Posted at 09:31:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Another useless epic that f2p players will open multiple times and complain how they can only have 2 meta decks at best as they do not have enough dust to craft good epics.
LeTroner · 1 points · Posted at 09:35:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
inb4 hunter gets really op because there will be support cards for this.
Laui02 · 1 points · Posted at 09:35:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Thats a good card. Nobody can now complain that you need too mich Epic cards. More of these and hunters will be viable ..... I mean cheap again
rudxo427 · 1 points · Posted at 09:48:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There better be a legendary with a goddamn OP AS FUCK effect that would justify not running any minions in hunter AND run this card. Hunter is my most played, first golden class and this is such a huge shame.
Sheena314 · 1 points · Posted at 09:50:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow, they must really hate Hunter.
Corpit · 1 points · Posted at 09:51:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Change the text to 'Discover and summon', and it's suddenly a bit more interesting.
chinditto · 1 points · Posted at 09:51:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This will go perfectly in my toxic arrow, crushing walls deck!
nothing_in_my_mind · 1 points · Posted at 09:57:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Mage: Removes almost anything, plus two smaller minions adjacent to it, for 6 mana.
Priest: Deals 5 damage to everything except his own minions for 6 mana.
Paladin: Puts 4/12 worth of stats, half of it with charge, on the board for 6 mana.
Shaman: Summons three 6 drops for 6 mana.
Druid: Puts up to 7/35 of stats on board for 6 mana.
Hunter: Summons one 2/4 creature for 6 mana (two if he meets an extremely difficult condition)
MachineGunPablo · 1 points · Posted at 09:58:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Worst card ever printed?
Darkpaladin109 · 1 points · Posted at 09:59:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They really should've at least lowered it's cost to 4 or 5 if they wanted it to have this downside.
RoachboyRNGesus · 1 points · Posted at 10:02:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow hopefully they nerf this to only one animal companion pretty soon
sparrowhawk73 · 1 points · Posted at 10:06:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
OK, I just woke up. This is a joke, right? Take away that stupid condition, or at least reduce the cost or make it say no beast. I think they didn't want this to be an auto include in every hunter deck, but made it so it could only be half playable in a Barnes yssarj deck. It's a steal rogue and grimestreet informant nerf. It might be too early to say, but if ever a card needed a buff, this would be it.
plai679 · 1 points · Posted at 10:06:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well.... I know what epic duplicates imma be pulling next week.
badbadbuddha · 1 points · Posted at 10:08:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Fake I guess.
Couspar · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I want to try a deck with this, hemet, rexxar, tracking and stitched tracker. Maybe throw in medeivh and call of the wild.
PM_ME_UR_WORRIMENTS · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
how can one
can even suggest
such a bs card?
what cards might follow to make this card anything, but playable?
I already try to imagine a Wizard Hunter archetype (Spells, Secrets, Weapons? and mandatory DK) and it might, might be something interesting while also including some minions such as [[Cloaked Huntress]], [[Professor Putricide]], but there are def not enough cards to support this. So... See you the next expansion ;)
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 10:10:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
3 Mana 3/4 - Your Secrets cost (0).
4 Mana 5/4 - After you play a Secret, put a random Hunter Secret into the battlefield.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
wswsasd · 1 points · Posted at 10:10:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
They should rename this card 'Missed the Mark' because that's certainly what they did with this one
phoenixmusicman · 1 points · Posted at 10:12:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What the actual fuck? Is that last bit a troll? Surely? It's just double animal companion with a stupid as fuck downside. Wtf. Was this printed to help beat the lich king or some shit?
Marx_Forever · 1 points · Posted at 10:12:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hmm... I Hunter deck with only spells/secrets and Deathsalker. Could that work? It could still effectively have up to 14 minions without playing a single Minion Card, 24 if you count secrets, and that's before Rexxar, which is actually pretty interesting when you think about it.
That said. I don't mind quirky cards. I mind them being epics though...
phoenixmusicman · 1 points · Posted at 10:12:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Can't wait to pull this fucking 6 times in the first 50 packs
Invoqwer · 1 points · Posted at 10:13:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are there enough non-minion cards to justify this? I used to run a no-minion hunter deck for questing with bows and secrets and burn and it would sometimes be able to actually beat netdecks in casual mode (happened to be very effective vs mages for some reason).
Obviously it'll never be META but it's still interesting.
I think the real question we must first ask ourselves, is the following: How much mana would you pay for 2 animal companions in one card? What is the average outcome and how useful is that to us in most scenarios? How good of a 6-drop is this compared to a card like highmane? (obviously this card is more active bc it can have immediate board presence thru +attack, taunt, and charge).
Personally I think the card itself is good when you can play it for 2 companions. Really good, infact. So now the question becomes, IMO, how much board presence (and maybe face damage) can you leverage without running minions? Which spells summon minions? Do you even need minions? Is it feasible to SMORC with BOW+secrets?
I'll be having fun with this card in the future.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:22:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
well.... I mean.....
Maybe they're still in shock over call of the wild being OP OP? (and then never played again)
DocFreezer · 1 points · Posted at 10:23:55 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Change to discover an animal companion, and we in business!
Menchstick · 1 points · Posted at 10:33:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can see this as a big hunter card, you'd probably run 7 minions at best and with recruit you can force them out. A bad card for a bad deck but I can respect memey epic cards.
SuperGore · 1 points · Posted at 10:36:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard you absoluct madman! Calm down!!
Mimeer · 1 points · Posted at 10:40:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This seems like a good reward for playing no minions (remeber how people understimated CoW? this is turn 6), but not strong enough a reward to make you play that deck.
Maybe in some kind of deck with only barnes and Yshaarj?
HeedWobbit · 1 points · Posted at 10:50:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I for one can't wait to put two of these in my Malygos-Barnes-deck!
YenzMcGee · 1 points · Posted at 10:50:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg Hunters are back! - For the Meme!
elveszett · 1 points · Posted at 10:53:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"Be absolutely terrible unless you take a massive punishment, in that case, be moderately good."
ffs, if they want a 30-spell deck to be a thing, why does it have to be on a class whose only virtue is to have strong minions?
L1ghty · 1 points · Posted at 11:00:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It doesn't say random, so discover then? Or poor wording?
lamedudese · 1 points · Posted at 11:03:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To my dust collection!
vietcongsurvivor1986 · 1 points · Posted at 11:04:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'd, no joke, run a magma rager in my hunter deck over this.
Serious_Much · 1 points · Posted at 11:08:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
When hunter is in dire need of help to have a relevant deck or to ever have a non-tempo related archetype, and they print this awful card?
Get out
Szwajcarek · 1 points · Posted at 11:09:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Now we can say there are 8 classes in HS
DEMACIAA · 1 points · Posted at 11:09:34 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
LOL my sides..
Puuksu · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
i like this card
Atoonix · 1 points · Posted at 11:12:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why are all the Hunter Epics and Legendaries pure garbage. Can we at least get a designer insight by either Ben Brode or Mike Donias so they can clarify why Hunter can't be a competitive class like all the other 8 classes. We're not asking that they overdo it like they're doing with Priest but a simple Tier 2 deck which sees the slightest play in tournaments would really be appreciated!
tymandude1 · 1 points · Posted at 11:13:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Or I could spend 3 more mana and actually have minions and get all 3 of the animal companions!
Kolz · 1 points · Posted at 11:18:26 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I hate when people say “this is the worst card ever”. It’s not. There are much worse cards in the basic set and classic. People said the same about purify and that was equally stupid.
Having said that, this card is really dumb. For starters, one of the animal companions (leokk) is hot garbage without other minions. You’d need a lot more spells that summon minions to make him useful at all. Then it’s just over ousted in general I’d say, if you need to meet such a tough condition you need something above par to come out of it. This would be a lot better at 5 mana.
Rezonex · 1 points · Posted at 11:21:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Waay too reliant on Deathstalker, a legendary in a deck with little deck thinning.
waterstorm92 · 1 points · Posted at 11:22:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Well boys, I think we found the meme card for this expansion
Moogzie · 1 points · Posted at 11:26:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
how can they print shit like kazakus, with a less punishing downside, and this, which isnt even a good card if it had no requirment
i genuinely wonder how the discussion goes for them when they balance cards like this, it must be something like "well, fuck hunter"
ANYTHING_BUT_COTW · 1 points · Posted at 11:26:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Call of the Dust?
DotColonSlashSlash · 1 points · Posted at 11:39:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is gonna be a hard one for /u/ChumpHS to somehow make work. : )
MightiestEwok · 1 points · Posted at 11:39:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is insultingly bad. 0 effort put into making this card and the team should feel bad.
XalAtoh · 1 points · Posted at 11:40:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg-saron nerf
Griimm305 · 1 points · Posted at 11:50:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Actually... I like the card. Hunter has the most minion summoning spells in the game. Will it be tier 1? Probably not, but I can dream!
Slackerboy7001 · 1 points · Posted at 12:13:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Insert Ben Brode Laughter
glorioussideboob · 1 points · Posted at 12:16:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
No
DragonGuard666 · 1 points · Posted at 12:21:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Petition to rename this card '100 dust'. Holy shit, what is Blizzard thinking?
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:22:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
Dejavueman · 1 points · Posted at 12:34:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
omegalul
Yaslav · 1 points · Posted at 12:39:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the best card in this set, for Blizzard. You get this in your pack, and you are 300 dust behind already, having to buy more packs in search for the feel of pride and accomplishment.
Jackolope · 1 points · Posted at 12:42:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I was actually still on the fence about preordering, stuck between a fun looking expansion and poor business practices. Now I'm just thinking about opening 3 of these and no other epics. 300 dust in return for those.
Yeah, fuck off Blizzard.
gadaspir · 1 points · Posted at 12:52:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe there will be a hunter card that transforms all minion cards into spells "summon x minion"? Trying to think why this card would exsist....
930419 · 1 points · Posted at 12:55:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter has been boring and shit tier for like 3 expansions now and we get cards like this? Priest went from shit tier to great to fucking god tier with this expansion and hunters well fuck hunters according to blizzard.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:00:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So I came in this morning, as a casual player, to see "oh man, here comes some overreaction about a card that isn't that bad, will probably actually be decent in some decks, what are these loonies Complaning about now?"
.... Wow. I just don't understand this card. At all.
Flying_Scorpion · 1 points · Posted at 13:08:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So you fill your deck with spells, traps, and weapons? Hmm, could use that bow with "Whenever a secret is revealed" to get more time with it out. IDK man.. pretty risky not having minions on the board but hey, this might be worth trying.
Slayer_Of_Anubis · 1 points · Posted at 13:09:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alright all you circlejerkers we can come back to this when it's Tier2-3 (because I guarantee right now it will). This card is really good in the deck it will make
wtfduud · 1 points · Posted at 13:15:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You're supposed to put this in a deck with no minions in it. Only spells to summon minions. They're pushing marksman hunter.
Maryachy · 1 points · Posted at 13:15:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Maybe this is a nerf to run 2 legendaries in hunter -> savannah highmaneeee
Russ0418 · 1 points · Posted at 13:20:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I thought this card was from the custom hearthstone subreddit when I saw it on my feed..
kfgasd · 1 points · Posted at 13:31:18 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You guys are missing something here. This is a buff against Lich king boss, obviously.
dezienn · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The one thing i do not get is why is this not 5 mana. It has a requirement it should be 5. I get that call fo the wold was op on 8 mana instead of 9, but this thing wouldnt be the same, its a lot less consistent it has a requirement it should be 5 really.
chongo79 · 1 points · Posted at 13:41:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Swashburgler nerf?
Rabid_Mexican · 1 points · Posted at 14:12:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wouldn’t even see play at 4 mana.....
xZiGGY · 1 points · Posted at 14:17:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[[My Sides]]
GamingGodzilla · 1 points · Posted at 14:19:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter legendary weapon: At the end of your turn, recruit minions until your board is full.
AdSin15 · 1 points · Posted at 14:34:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I play hunter as a new player...this is insultingly bad. The main reason I playhunter is that I got deathstalker rexxar and prof putricide in packs I won doing F2P stuff. I had no idea about game strengths of classes...I just really enjoy building beasts and dropping secrets on the map.
This makes me question buying the new expansion. Why pay50 bucks to get cards like this?
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wtf is that
starfishno1 · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:27 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can beat the Lich King as hunter now thanks to this card
Realize12 · 1 points · Posted at 14:57:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what's next, 12 mana summon 4 animal companions?
ActuallyAquaman · 1 points · Posted at 15:03:37 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I mean... maybe if they got more card draw, you could use BuildABeast as your main source of minions? But this is just... abysmal. I’m talking worse than [[Purify]] here.
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 15:03:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
2 Mana - Silence a friendly minion. Draw a card.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
Tsobaphomet · 1 points · Posted at 15:05:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
uhh
tacoguy1234 · 1 points · Posted at 15:12:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
what the hell is this
RedditIsAnAddiction · 1 points · Posted at 15:24:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It should be mana 5 but it won't be cause Blizzard.
ignorediacritics · 1 points · Posted at 15:25:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hunter just got purified.
OtherJesus · 1 points · Posted at 15:26:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I figured out what people are missing about this card.
It's not "To My Side."
It's "To My Side!"
Guys!!! See the difference!!!!!! See the power I have when I use and exclamation mark?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The idea is when Rexxxar yells "To My Side!" The opponent is frightened and cowers behind his keyboard and misses two turns.
Thankfully more cards don't have an exclamation mark or this set would be extreme power creep.
TheMentelgen · 1 points · Posted at 15:30:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
THAT DOES NOT BELONG IN
A MUSEUMHEARTHSTONE.bloodflart · 1 points · Posted at 15:38:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
LOL
Jakabov · 1 points · Posted at 15:51:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Alright, I'm out.
conitation · 1 points · Posted at 16:04:11 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why not just make this 3 cost. The fact you have no minions, in a hunter deck, means it is a crappy hunter deck. There are no synergies I can think of for this card, shoot even a spell and weapon deck would be running spell power minions, weapon buffing minions, and flipping yog.
Gankdatnoob · 1 points · Posted at 16:11:25 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Please Day 9!! Ask about this card in the Brode stream!
AlexTheBrick · 1 points · Posted at 16:11:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If this wasn't an epic Id try a spell heavy hunter deck with the spell stone and minion generating spells.
Gossil · 1 points · Posted at 16:28:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Donais hinted that this might be good with other cards not yet revealed, and we have Recruit, but the weapon would have to be insane or Hunters would need some absurd spells for this card to even work. And it isn't that good if it works.
CalzoneCalzone · 1 points · Posted at 16:31:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The art for this looks like the old Pokémon cards. I'm not sure if I like it.
MnemonicJohnny · 1 points · Posted at 16:32:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is Hunter's Bolster/Purify. It's only a matter of time until the pendulum swings back, Blizzard prints strong cards for Hunter again, and it gets a meta deck that everyone hates again.
the3natural · 1 points · Posted at 16:49:00 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this a real card? It’s just so bad that I can’t believe that one, or multiple people, sat around and created this card, thinking it was a good idea. Then having it pass through whatever process happens to make it into the live game.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:50:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You know. At least Magma rager had a PURPOSE. This? This is just shite.
ChrisKamro · 1 points · Posted at 17:14:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Its clear by now Blizzard doesnt want Hunter to be playable anymore
shadyape4 · 1 points · Posted at 17:17:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card could have been pretty good, but you cant play any of the good spell synergy minions like Yogg and Arcane giants. Even if Blizzard is trying to support a no minion archetype, there's no need to put this restriction on the card. It's not like it would be on the power level of Call of the Wild at 8 mana.
DropHack · 1 points · Posted at 17:30:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
https://twitter.com/NickChipperHS/status/937213339712851968
harry10ph · 1 points · Posted at 17:41:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I wish it was common so it didn't ruin my chances of getting the many important epics released this expansion.
AppleBlumpkinator · 1 points · Posted at 17:45:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I love playing with bad cards and still trying to win, but this card is hot trash.
Alejandro_404 · 1 points · Posted at 17:52:57 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Lol what a trash card
_Peavey · 1 points · Posted at 18:00:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Make it 3 mana and I would be ok with it.
At this time this card is worse than purify.
MoistLagsna · 1 points · Posted at 18:33:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
We did it reddit, we actually thought things couldn’t get worse than purify.
JamminWithJosh · 1 points · Posted at 18:33:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
F
FrostHydra · 1 points · Posted at 18:53:13 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This would probably still not see play if it was 4 mana...
TheNethermaster · 1 points · Posted at 19:01:05 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is the price to pay for Bonemare being common, right?
MisterManatee · 1 points · Posted at 19:19:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
There really isn't anything that would make this good; it's not like [[Purify]]. Summoning two animal companions for 6 mana just isn't good. Even if the Hunter legendary helps with the requirement, or doubles your spells or something crazy, it's still just a lackluster card.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:24:47 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:32:35 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can't tell if this is a joke or not. You know that was a shitpost right?
Majesticfatguy · 1 points · Posted at 19:41:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
AND NOW I DISAPPEAR IN A CLOUD OF STUPIDITY YOU NEVER SAW THIS COMMENT OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
tot567 · 1 points · Posted at 19:37:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
wtf that card is complete garbage it doesn't make any sense
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 20:03:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel like the hunter weapon will be something like "if your deck has no minions, spells cast twice" blizzard can't be trying to screw the class over this much right?
Quickning · 1 points · Posted at 20:16:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's fake right?
Rand_alThor_ · 1 points · Posted at 21:02:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Why is this not 3-4 mana?
theKGS · 1 points · Posted at 22:45:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
3 mana would make it a strictly better animal companion. It would need to be at least 4 mana.
dogspeeonme · 1 points · Posted at 21:31:53 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So likely this card will be complete garbage, but there has to be that one guy who goes "This is meta-defining!" I'll be that guy.
I don't know how but I have nothing to lose. If it turns out to be the worst card ever though I'll assuredly open it as my only epic.
akiva23 · 1 points · Posted at 22:29:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let's be real. In a vacuum this is not worse than purify and people found a way to make it work. I'm not saying it's good but maybe after a little while with some more support, we'll get a really sweet tier 5 or 6 deck.
cosmicosmo4 · 1 points · Posted at 22:35:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
... my sides
theKGS · 1 points · Posted at 22:44:36 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Even without the condition, would this be playable? 6 mana, summon 2 animal companions?
I'm not seeing it.
smorcwin · 1 points · Posted at 22:52:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow so lazy and bad
TWOREFINE · 1 points · Posted at 23:16:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I'm sick of seeing hunter get shafted with the worst class epics compared to the other classes. Seriously for the past two expansions, no decent hunter deck uses any class epics from the recent sets because of how low their power level is or simply the fact that they're just terrible.With the exception of rat pack I guess, but even that doesn't see much play nowadays. Like hunter has been for the longest time and still is one of the worst classes to play and yet the developers have the audacity to continue giving hunter this type of treatment and that infuriates me. I get it that not all epics are supposed to be a game changer, but for fuck sake man as a previous hunter main, I am bored of relying on mostly the class cards just have a reasonable chance to play against the other classes.
very_asthetic_bob · 1 points · Posted at 00:13:32 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is it really that bad? It says "Summon an animal companion", there is no "random" like in "Animal companion". Can you choose?
enkae7317 · 1 points · Posted at 00:42:33 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
This has been the worst card design in the history of card design, maybe ever.
TrippinOnCaffeine · 1 points · Posted at 01:15:46 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card could see play in a Barnes-Y'Shaarj Hunter, but only because most Hunter spells are bad enough that you have to use shitty spells just to reach 30 cards. And even then it probably still won't be worth running in that deck because it will only be active on turn 6 like half the time.
sdaval · 1 points · Posted at 02:30:50 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I know this is an old post but I've scrolled through the bulk of the comments here and on the majority of the other shit posts about this card and haven't found the answer to this: Does this card summon two RANDOM Animal Companions or do we get to choose?
SgtBrutalisk · 1 points · Posted at 04:04:37 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Two random.
OtherJesus · 1 points · Posted at 04:45:48 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Come on, friend. If we got choose, this card would cost 12 mana for Hunter.
sdaval · 2 points · Posted at 05:33:00 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
I hit stage 3, what can I say.
EricSowers · 1 points · Posted at 03:04:46 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Either team 5 want hunter to be down in trash tier for the entirety of this set, or they're really trying to push Yogg and load decks.
ineedwaffles1 · 1 points · Posted at 03:07:47 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
This makes me a bit sad, I like to play hunter a lot
Vannysh · 1 points · Posted at 03:39:19 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
How the fuck did this card get printed
sekksipanda · 1 points · Posted at 15:01:01 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Good thing about it being epic is it won't fuck the class as much in arena as if it was common.
It will suck to open this trash on a pack though.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:00:15 on December 5, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stuff like this makes me glad I haven't spent a dime on this game in a year and a half
thelastprodigy · 1 points · Posted at 15:43:21 on December 5, 2017 · (Permalink)
why would you include this in your deck when you could replace this with ligit anything else
Usssy · 1 points · Posted at 03:26:24 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hard not to mistake this one as a fake
CaranTh1R · 1 points · Posted at 03:29:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are people going to yell about spell hunter with dk and legendary weapon as a minion/damage out put is utter cancer a month from now on?
It might be hilarious to look back on this thread and know ‘wow, so that’s how bad the hs sub is at the game...’
chluebi · 1 points · Posted at 09:42:10 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
!remindme 4 weeks
RemindMeBot · 1 points · Posted at 09:42:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will be messaging you on 2017-12-31 09:42:25 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
chluebi · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:18 on February 9, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm back after 2 months.
I need to apologize to you: Spellhunter is defining the meta at the moment. Why did I not listen to you? I could've gotten to legend in a day!
chluebi · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:53 on February 9, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm back after 2 months.
I need to apologize to you: Spellhunter is defining the meta at the moment. Why did I not listen to you? I could've gotten to legend in a day!
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:47:29 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
What I really like about this card is synergy with the new recruit mechanism.
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:19:38 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Are they just recycling flavor text at this point?
2 Animal Companion < 1 To My Side
Blizzard Logic.
Raktoner · 1 points · Posted at 03:41:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
/u/mdonais Explain.
Zen_Galactic · 2 points · Posted at 03:43:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
"Not every card is going to be meta defining, but this card has great personality! Yeah, you have to remove everything from your deck that allows you to compete with the other classes, but the payoff is huge! Plus, mages that get this off of their random spell casts are going to be happy (maybe!)"
BreakSage · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
He actually posted here. There's more cards coming to support this.
Geniii · 1 points · Posted at 03:50:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you fulfill a Highlander condition, you get 30 health, a Kazakus potion, a free hero power. If you fulfill having no freaking minion in your deck, you get a mere 1 card advantage? How is this fair?
u/legendaryferret u/mdonais
MC_THUNDERCUNT · 1 points · Posted at 05:24:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hahaha, so this solidifies my plan to only spend half my gold this expansion. Fuck you Team 5. If you are already behind in threats, summon a random eight mana worth of stats for six mana.
If anyone needs me, I will be throwing matches as Rexxar at rank 22, both so Team 5 might eventually print Hunter cards, and so Mike Donais can reach rank 20 and start complaining about Priest instead of Hunter.
Sonreyes · 1 points · Posted at 05:26:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Blizzard just has to print the rest of the deck to make this card make sense
Gucci_Unicorns · 1 points · Posted at 07:17:07 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Calling it now, this card finds success in a t2 - t3 deck.
chluebi · 1 points · Posted at 09:45:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
!remindme 4 weeks
chluebi · 1 points · Posted at 06:22:16 on February 9, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm back after 2 months.
I need to apologize to you: Spellhunter is defining the meta at the moment. Why did I not listen to you? I could've gotten to legend in a day!
Gucci_Unicorns · 1 points · Posted at 07:08:55 on February 9, 2018 · (Permalink)
Holy shit.
UberEinstein99 · -1 points · Posted at 03:44:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In all honestly, the card probably still sucks, but thinking about it a little more, i think I see where Blizzard was coming from when printing this card. Hunter is probably the only class that can win games without any minions in it’s deck. With weapons, skill commands, regular animal companions, steady shot and DK Rexxar, hunter can win games with absolutely no minions in the deck. I’m not saying it would be good, but hunter is probably the only class that can win even one game with no minions in its deck. That’s why Blizzard designed hunter’s fight with the Lich King in such a way that you had to play as little minions as possible. This card has a home in a meme minionless hunter decks, which can actually expect to win every one out of twenty games. So I guess because of that it does have some meme potential? That’s the best I can come up with to salvage this card. Blizz would have to print some broken cards to make minionless hunter good though. Like seriously broken cards. Like this card would have to be like 4 mana or something. I just realy hope the hunter legendary weapon wasn’t solely made for a minionless hunter deck.
oopoctothorpe · 0 points · Posted at 03:38:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
To be fair, Yogg-N-Load is my all time favorite hunter build! Glad to see it supported!
UberEinstein99 · 8 points · Posted at 03:47:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Last I checked, Yogg is a minion. Unless you plan to have Yogg in your opening hand evergy game, you’ll be playing a 6 mana 2/4.
Whilst-dicking · 2 points · Posted at 13:12:14 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
That's what recruit is for, just recruit your yogg out!
UberEinstein99 · 0 points · Posted at 14:11:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Idk if this is a joke or not, but if it’s not you do realize that Yogg’s battlecry won’t trigger when you recruit it right? Also hunter has no spells that recruit a minion.
oopoctothorpe · 0 points · Posted at 06:23:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Umm... you might get him by turn 6. You'll be holding a lot of spells, so it isn't horrible. Plus, gives you stuff to play post-Yogg.
Pacify_ · 1 points · Posted at 07:47:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It doesn't even work in Yogg and Load. If you draw yogg early, that really sucks
[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 06:22:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[removed]
Whilst-dicking · 2 points · Posted at 13:13:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Mods please ban this guy
steved32 · 0 points · Posted at 03:27:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Hopefully all the epics Fremont April's expansion will be this good, think of the dust
RollexPriest · -6 points · Posted at 04:03:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't know why there's so much hate for this card already. The hunter weapon hasn't been revealed yet and there's a good chance that there's another hunter spell that hasnt been revealed. It could be conditional card draw that requires you to have no minions in your deck.
(x2) tracking (x2) hunters mark (x6) secrets (x2) Animal Companions (x2) UTH (x2) Kill command (x2) Bow (x1) deadly shot (x4) Hunter legendary weapon (x2)spell stone (x2) to my side (x1) crushing walls (x1) Rexxar (x2) Call of the wild
I made this list off the top of my head but I can only assume there's a must run spell in the Commons to make the archetype work and the hunter legendary weapon to have some synergy. Could definitely see it being a 4/7 mana cost weapon that curves well in hunter and doesn't compete with other cards.
TL;DR
Don't hate before all the cards are revealed. Could open up control hunter archetype in the future.
Gflowhugger · 6 points · Posted at 10:01:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I will eat my fucking socks if control hunter with no minions is a thing
LordDavey · 1 points · Posted at 04:16:37 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
dude, even if this costed 4 mana, unless a fucking miracle happens, it would see absolutely no play above rank 15. hell, even above 20.
jayceja · -1 points · Posted at 04:47:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This card is not good because the no creature hunter deck is not good. But I think that the card is probably at a completely reasonable power level if it's played in the bad deck it's meant for, so I'm ok with this card being printed for that archtype that I'm sure a lot of people probably want to play for fun.
If hunter is going to continue to be terrible this expansion with 9 other cards that are not this, one more different card probably wasn't gonna swing the difference without being completely fucked.
LordDavey · 1 points · Posted at 04:15:10 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
what makes me wonder how this got through all the people working on it, is how its so fucking bad, and is also not fun to play. even when you get it to work and live to tell about it, youre telling about how you summoned a misha and a leokk. fun times.
jayceja · 1 points · Posted at 04:31:24 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
The fallacy is that people don't realise that cards don't need to be 'silly' or 'crazy' or 'fun' to be good additions in decks that are.
LordDavey · 1 points · Posted at 05:13:51 on December 4, 2017 · (Permalink)
Okay, but it should either be viable OR fun to play. When a card is neither of those, and very pathetically so, it's just downright sad
Reddit-phobia · -1 points · Posted at 06:05:12 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Before everyone says this card is trash we should probably wait for blizzard to show the rest of the cards. maybe they are bringing cards that synergize with this. Maybe the return of Yogg-Saron hunter.
KTheOneTrueKing · -1 points · Posted at 07:26:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't think this card is quite "worst card ever printed" level, but it definitely is forcing a specific deck archetype that may not be competitive. But really, when you think about it, Hunter has, now, 6 cards in a deck that generate animal compantions. 2x Animal Companion, 2x To my Side, 2x Call of the Wild. Add to that that you can have some minions/beasts and recruit them with the hunter legendary, as well as more creature creation via DK Rexxar and Unleash and Bear Trap and Panther trap... I wonder if just maybe this deck is playable in meme situations.
13pts35sec · 0 points · Posted at 05:07:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
inb4 team 5 sneak buffs it to summon two normally then three if you have no minions. I'd play that in big hunter. Hopefully the card just doesn't actually exist somehow
Mudblood_Mike · 0 points · Posted at 07:44:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This is perfect for my encounter with Hunter against the Lich King that I have not beaten yet.
ThunderCraft · 0 points · Posted at 11:15:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I feel bad for the artist. I wouldn't have my art on such garbage of a card.
nameandnumbers123 · 0 points · Posted at 11:27:50 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
So this spell is for Yogg, right? Not Yogg'N'Load, but for when your last card is Yogg and you play it as a Hail Mary. This will show up on Trolden pretty quickly with someone getting huffer(s) for lethal.
dukenukem3 · 0 points · Posted at 17:52:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I don't know why everyone seem so mad about this card. Crushing walls is waaaay worse. This card can actually work in Ysarj hunter where 2 your minions are Barns and Ysarj. Well, you replace them. Not sure why you have to do it, may be after rotation you have to. But still it should cost 5 mana though.
portobellojelly · 0 points · Posted at 22:23:49 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
This will be a great card for Yogg-Saron to randomly cast in my 29 Spells 1 Yogg mage deck.
Actually, it WAS a 29 Spells 1 Yogg mage deck, until I teched in two Babbling Books cause I figured they're basically spells. Not anymore with this card. Gotta adapt to new metas, y'know?
RektumRanger · 0 points · Posted at 23:29:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Am I thinking wrong or won't that mean as long as you have all beasts in your deck you'll just used animal companion twice when you use this card? Or do they consider beasts as minions.....
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 23:44:09 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Beasts are minions, lol.
RektumRanger · 1 points · Posted at 23:46:58 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ok, well just the way I thought of it like give a random beast x/x stats I just figured maybe this was the same way.
doubletaketwice · -4 points · Posted at 03:04:48 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Finally, Blizzard printing support for Y'Shaarj hunter.
Myopiniondusntmatter · 4 points · Posted at 03:19:02 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
But those are minions!!! This is shit no matter which way you spin it
doubletaketwice · 1 points · Posted at 03:47:16 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It summons both if you have already barnes>yshaarj>yshaarj. Might be a decent one off in that list in standard since hunters struggle to find enough non minion cards to fill out the deck.
Myopiniondusntmatter · 2 points · Posted at 04:10:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yea but at that point you either win the game on the spot, or, they have an answer for it and your whole deck is fucked anyways. And if you don't draw Barnes this card is a 6 mana animal companion at which point you probably already lost because you haven't played a minion all game
doubletaketwice · 2 points · Posted at 04:28:15 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
In my experience from playing this deck before the last rotation, it is definitely possible to win games that aren't decided by the barnes yshaarj cheese. From KotFT Deathstalker Rexxar gives you an alternate win condition if they deal with the Barnes Yshaarj. Other games can be won with the hunter hero power and face damage from tokens.
The deck lost a lot of cards in the last rotation and, before this expansion, hasn't had many cards to replace them. For reference, some of the cards lost were lock and load, power shot, bear trap, quick shot and ball of spiders. Some of the cards gained have been grievous bite, deathstalker rexxar and venomstrike trap. Since you need 28 non minion standard hunter cards there are some pretty borderline cards which could be replaced by this new card. It still might not be in the top 28 since K&C has already added the spellstone and new secret, but I think it's worth a try as one of the last cards in a tier 5 meme deck.
Myopiniondusntmatter · 1 points · Posted at 04:47:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I guess yea, but I was speaking from a competitive standpoint. Of course you can say anything is viable at rank 25. I know all about the meme Barnes deck. I used it to gain my last 20~ wins for golden hunter. The problem with this new card is it doesn't even have meme potential, it's either a dead draw or you probably lost or won depending on if you drew the nuts. I can't fathom any card that will make it work outside of giving hunter some REAL removal. But if that actually were to happen we wouldn't be sitting here discussing which meme hunter deck is going to make the class even worth playing because theyd actually be competing.
I apologize for the run on sentencing and formatting, I tend to do that when theory crafting.
EatYourFood · -2 points · Posted at 03:15:30 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can see this being good if Hunter gets a recruit a beast spell.
[deleted] · -5 points · Posted at 03:03:31 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
TheBigLman · 13 points · Posted at 03:04:08 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yogg is a minion....
[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 03:05:42 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
TheBigLman · 2 points · Posted at 03:07:19 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Sounds like a terrible idea. RNG heavy.
DoctorWho1111 · 1 points · Posted at 03:09:59 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
It's Yogg N' Load, RNG is the name of the game!
TheBigLman · 1 points · Posted at 03:10:46 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Yeah, its a fun card for a fun deck.
DoctorWho1111 · 1 points · Posted at 03:13:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Agreed, I'll definitely try to meme with this
Definitely will never see competetive play tho
DoctorWho1111 · -1 points · Posted at 03:06:17 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
True, but in that deck you'd run few minions and lots of spells
This isn't for a deck with literally zero minions lol
Rabbit_Hoof · 1 points · Posted at 03:21:32 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Just like the original MVP card [[Ball of Spiders]] /s
hearthscan-bot · 1 points · Posted at 03:22:06 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
6 Mana - Summon three 1/1 Webspinners.
Call/PM me with up to 7 [[cardname]]. About.
billofrighteous · -9 points · Posted at 03:29:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Calling it now, this card is the Prince Keleseth of the set.
monopopo2761 · 5 points · Posted at 05:16:01 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You are definitely wrong
SnazzyPants0201 · -4 points · Posted at 03:04:33 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Big beast hunter seems to be Blizzard's theme for this next expansion. Recruit works really well with this card, thinning your deck of minions really fast.
FroggenOP · 9 points · Posted at 03:05:52 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
even then this card is bad. hunter needs early game minions to survive, even if they aren't beast, this is just BAD, even at 4 mana would been bad because of no minions
Toastboaster · -1 points · Posted at 03:04:54 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Wow. I was hoping the whole time to the reveal that it wouldn't be 6 mana. What a joke of a card, you build your deck around their subpar spells and you get what, two low rolls on animal companion? This effect would be okayish without the restriction, blizzard are trying to make them a joke now...
Regelope · -1 points · Posted at 03:11:28 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
The fact that people think this card is bad is blowing my mind. Hunter probably has the most ways to play minions without actually playing minions. I think spell hunter could be a really interesting archetype.
CivilKobold · 2 points · Posted at 03:27:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
If you discover the companion this would be fine at 5 mana. Set a remind so that you can tell me how it goes.
Slapskad · -1 points · Posted at 03:25:03 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Is this a joke or what?
Wintermuteson · -1 points · Posted at 07:18:43 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I actually think this is an incredibly good card. if you're already cutting your savannah highmane for spells in say a yogg and load hunter, you don't have a turn six play, so you're getting the value of two 3 mana cards, at six mana, but while only having to play one card. That gives you a whole nother card with which to concede.
Menchstick · -1 points · Posted at 10:32:44 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
I can see this as a big hunter card, you'd probably run 7 minions at best and with recruit you can force them out. A bad card for a bad deck but I can respect memey epic cards.
ethicalAndroid · -2 points · Posted at 03:24:45 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
its like they tried to make another reno but worse
GNGJ · -2 points · Posted at 03:27:39 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Let's think about possible synergies. How about another new spell that repeats a spell that you just cast?! Now you get 4 ACs! Is that worth two cards and 6 + x mana? I'd say yes. Let's wait and see what drops on Monday before coming to any conclusions. If nothing shows up then we know that Team 9 has truly created one of the worst HS cards ever, and basically hates Hunter. Edit: Team 5
Soulsek · 3 points · Posted at 03:30:40 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
Didn't expect them to forge a worse card than the 2/4 9 mana costing recruit a dragon card. But they did in the same expansion!!
mybustersword · -2 points · Posted at 03:40:04 on December 3, 2017 · (Permalink)
You fools.... Yogg hunter shall return!!