I think that both old and new Pokemon all look fantastic, but I feel that the shape of the eyes is a huge part of why people say that new Pokemon "don't look like Pokemon."

🎙️ IanMazgelis · 61972 points · Posted at 04:34:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)


Saved comment

GMJizzy · 8368 points · Posted at 04:47:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

PSBattle, Put the old Pokémon eyes on the New Pokémon

Berlchicken · 14937 points · Posted at 10:04:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had a go at some, can make more if you guys like it[1]

edit: alright guys I'm making it into an album since you like them, each gif takes about 15-20 mins.

edit2: If you have any requests, please hmu. Some of them work better than others.

edit3: I'm serious about requests. Idk what to do, give me a 6th or 7th gen pokemon. I'm reading all the replies.

final edit: to those late to the party, I'm sorry but I stopped taking requests hours ago.


[1]

Pokemon eye fusions

SwedishFool · 4080 points · Posted at 10:11:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is amazing, what a difference!

xDangeRxDavEx · 4779 points · Posted at 12:40:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me before: Just the eyes? I mean, maybe.

Me after: Yup, it's totally the eyes.

starscr3amsgh0st · 1883 points · Posted at 13:01:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was shocked how much the eyes changed them.

zer0w0rries · 1701 points · Posted at 13:28:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They go from "oh, what a cute creature" to "yeah, I can see that one kicking ass with the right training."

BartSimpWhoTheHellRU · 171 points · Posted at 14:01:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

From "Hey, want to play Pokemon?" to "Let's battle our pocket MONSTERS!"

IgotUBro · 3 points · Posted at 02:32:34 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

pocketo MANSTERS

Timmytanks40 · 388 points · Posted at 13:42:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Calm down Rocky.

AP-TOaD · 18 points · Posted at 14:09:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Relax bowlcut.

sp4ce · 8 points · Posted at 14:13:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He's right tho

afrosamuraih · 2 points · Posted at 14:57:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

FTFY *Brock

Lurker_MeritBadge · 2 points · Posted at 17:38:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tommy! I didn't hear no bell!

Balenar · 50 points · Posted at 14:08:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the ice cream turned from being cute to looking like it would murder you in your sleep, and a lot of the other ones look a whole lot cooler with those eyes

SmithKurosaki · 2 points · Posted at 20:24:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Made me think that it probably has a really messed up pokedex entry

shallstorm · 4 points · Posted at 03:43:15 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

To attract prey, Vanillite regularly abrades away portions of its body until it resembles a frozen dessert.

Messed up enough?

mysticmusti · 3 points · Posted at 15:05:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And that's the thing, not every pokemon is meant to be an utter aggressive badass. They are highly intelligent and compassionate creatures and their eyes reflect that.

Skybombardier · 1 points · Posted at 17:23:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Especially the giant ice cream cone

SmithKurosaki · 1 points · Posted at 20:24:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oriocorio goes from 'awww cute' to 'oh god you're going to stab me'

metalsluger · 1 points · Posted at 20:57:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No wonder I find a lot of the newer pokemon cuter, its the eyes, I thought that Tentacruel looked cuter with the Espurr's eyes.

thegreedyturtle · 1 points · Posted at 23:30:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"You want some flippin' Ice Cream?? I'll give you some Ice Cream!"

papereel · 0 points · Posted at 14:32:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think Lycanroc was the biggest difference, but Greninja was the only one I'd say looked BETTER with classic eyes. Poor Rockruff, my baby. :(

IcantbeliveImOnRddit · 27 points · Posted at 15:16:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Japanese Animes and Manga is everything about eye, that same eye will make you feel like hugging and jacking of those pillows; and with change of an eye will make you realize your grand paa's world war days.

mutantcake · 19 points · Posted at 14:21:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Your eyes and nose say a lot about your character and how people perceive you. An example is the Pokemon we just saw. Originally with the oval eyes they were perceived as cute, but now they're perceived as aggressive. Next time you play a game with character creation try it out

DevotedToNeurosis · 3 points · Posted at 17:00:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I'm developing a game that is similar to pokemon but with more agressive creatures. It's huge how much difference the eyes can make!

LoveBurstsLP · 4 points · Posted at 15:46:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That Greninja though fuaaaaark

gHx4 · 4 points · Posted at 00:20:42 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Way more than I expected, but I still don't like how many of the new pokemon have a 'circus' look to them with many colourful geometric shapes polka-dotted all over the place. Older pokemon had design that was much less flashy.

Meme_cheese · 3 points · Posted at 14:35:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude, totally the eyes

Chilluminaughty · 3 points · Posted at 15:32:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eyes have it.

KingKontinuum · 490 points · Posted at 13:28:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Even the subtle change to Greninja's eyes made a huge change to his demeanor.

Elcatracho4728 · 65 points · Posted at 13:46:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I personally believe he actually looks better with the older version of eyes than his default eyes

9shucky9ducky9 · 41 points · Posted at 13:54:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're in the minority. Kawaii ruined Pokemon for westerners.

Elcatracho4728 · 11 points · Posted at 14:18:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not going to deny that, maybe that's why I never got into the newer gen of pokemon. pretty much stopped watching after or getting into it whenever it was on the Sinnoh region, but my last region i actually liked was the Hoenn. I looked back and I saw the eyes for the most part were still similar to gen 1 and 2. I guess the eyes really did a big factor for me

DevotedToNeurosis · 1 points · Posted at 17:01:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you're looking for a monster game with more agressive creatures, feel free to join us on /r/crownsgame

ATownStomp · 3 points · Posted at 18:17:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just checked out the sub. Whoever is developing that must have so much fun with it. Or, maybe, the game has moved into the "driving you insane" phase of development. I could imagine the former preceding the latter.

DevotedToNeurosis · 1 points · Posted at 18:52:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

:)

Are you a developer? You sound like you have waged that war yourself.

ATownStomp · 2 points · Posted at 19:23:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm a senior majoring in CS who is not employed so it's a "spiritual" yes and a technical "no".

I have enough experience to understand how a labor of love turns into a labor of hate, and then back into a labor of love. That game is significantly larger than anything I've tackled before, though.

SmashDealer · 0 points · Posted at 16:48:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Came to say the same thing though. Pretty much all pokemon from that list looked better with the old eyes than with the new eyes, except greninja

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=squirtle&safe=off&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiinozX7ZzTAhXqCcAKHb-yDiUQ_AUICCgB&biw=1920&bih=950

Maybe water pokemon just look better rounded

Gekkouga3393 · 4 points · Posted at 02:12:13 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think greninja looks better with his default eyes because of the demeanor change that the eyes cause. With his default eyes, he give off a serious but relaxed kind of vibe; the older version just screams straight up aggressive, a water-ninja version of primape

hocuspocuskrokus · 1 points · Posted at 17:20:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not so cuddly looking anymore

GlyphGryph · 24 points · Posted at 14:36:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, I still don't think it's just the eyes, but boy oh boy is the eyes a big part of it. (I think the same design considerations that lead to them changing the eyes also lead to them changing the rest of the design too, but the eyes are where it most obviously comes through)

BeholdTheHair · 6 points · Posted at 17:31:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed. IMO, the overall design of the later-gen pokemon is too simplistic. Earlier 'mons, especially the first gen, are all sharp lines and angular features on creatures that are a fair approximation of animal morphology. The newer ones mostly seem to be little more than basic shapes, and most of those are simply some variation on "round." They don't even look like complex organisms, let alone advanced animal life.

Jahneboi · 5 points · Posted at 17:12:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Greninja actually looks pretty badass with the old eyes.

J-osh · 3 points · Posted at 13:56:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah as it turns out its fucking huge

mrjimi16 · 2 points · Posted at 16:28:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For some it is more the general roundness of them. For example, the second one has those round green things and they just look off.

BeholdTheHair · 1 points · Posted at 17:40:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Right. The eyes are the most striking symptom of the "problem," but they're still just a symptom. As I said in another reply, the overall design of the later-gen pokemon is too simplistic. Earlier 'mons, especially the first gen, were all sharp lines and angular features on creatures that are a fair approximation of animal morphology. The newer ones seem to be little more than basic shapes, and most of those are simply some variation on "round." They don't even look like complex organisms, let alone advanced animal life.

JunahCg · 2 points · Posted at 17:38:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Doesn't do it for me. The original designer had that knobby shape of charizard's horns all over. Starting with gen 2 everything was swoopy smooth line punctuated with zigzags. It's like the guy used Gengar as his style reference instead of the rhydon/cubone/substitute shape that was the origin of the style.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 18:56:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Absolutely, I didn't buy it at first. Saw those images. NOPE, 100% the eyes. I miss those old eyes.

berakyah · 3 points · Posted at 13:05:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This guy heh

DAVasquez- · 1 points · Posted at 19:38:02 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Most notorious in Sylveon.

sparkykingheat · 1 points · Posted at 13:04:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You speak great truths

jaked122 · 0 points · Posted at 14:06:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't see it that much.

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · -1 points · Posted at 14:51:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's plenty of new Pokémon with angular eyes. You can do the opposite with round eyes gen 1 Pokémon. OP cherry picked so hard.

BeholdTheHair · 1 points · Posted at 17:46:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not just the eyes, though; the overall design is pretty dramatically different. Most of the early 'mons were all sharp lines and angular features on creatures that are a fair approximation of animal morphology. An awful lot of the newer ones are little more than basic shapes, and most of those are simply some variation on "round." They barely even look like complex organisms, let alone advanced animal life.

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · 2 points · Posted at 18:29:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And gen 1 mons were totally ecologically researched when being designed right? You're letting your nostalgia goggles cloud ur view

[deleted] · 335 points · Posted at 12:31:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Anyone know if there's any psychology behind attraction and the shape of eyes?

RexUmbrae · 1514 points · Posted at 12:43:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think that the newer eyes make the Pokemon seem more innocent or weak, incapable, etc. whereas the older eyes make Pokemon seem like they're dangerous and should be taken more seriously.

TheMochilla · 837 points · Posted at 12:56:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are fighters not pets.

jen_pai · 307 points · Posted at 13:05:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's no reason as to why they can't be both.

Zorinth · 601 points · Posted at 13:16:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gary and Ash mentality, respectively.

hardrockfoo · 162 points · Posted at 13:46:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The show has Gary carring for his Pokemon just as much as Ash multiple times

Shinyleefeon · 129 points · Posted at 14:02:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm hoping he meant red and blue from the game but called them by their anime counterparts.

PrrrromotionGiven · 7 points · Posted at 14:13:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Y'know, I didn't remember it, but I just checked and Blue does get called out on being uncaring by Oak... fair enough.

TheMochilla · 3 points · Posted at 18:08:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In the game I named Gary 'Fart". I was 7...

Justice_Prince · 1 points · Posted at 18:52:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think AssFace was the most common name given to him.

Goretantath · 3 points · Posted at 14:29:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not in yellow version :3

Shinyleefeon · 3 points · Posted at 20:52:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the main character of yellow is still red actually. Reinforced by his team in GSC

KrimsonKasper · 2 points · Posted at 23:34:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Even still, Gary/Blue was always a dick to YOU but not his pokemon.

I mean, who killed his Radicate on the ship, him or you?

flintlok1721 · 3 points · Posted at 03:01:05 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

He definitely says a bunch of stuff that treats his pokemon like tools/trophies instead of beloved pets

A_Flamboyant_Warlock · 1 points · Posted at 08:26:42 on June 23, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never really got that vibe from him. He cared more about their strength than most, but he was also aiming for the championship. The only rival that I feel was a straight up dick to his 'mons was Silver.

saint_anamia · 2 points · Posted at 02:30:30 on May 10, 2017 · (Permalink)

ash isn't red. He's yellow

Shinyleefeon · 1 points · Posted at 02:49:25 on May 10, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean yellow came after the anime

GooeySlenderFerret · 4 points · Posted at 15:03:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea but circlejerk brother

WatermelonBandido · 2 points · Posted at 02:45:22 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gary was the good guy this whole time. He did nothing wrong.

SteampunkSamurai · 4 points · Posted at 14:32:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gary was actually pretty humane, if a bit of an ass. Ash vs Team Rocket mentality would be more accurate.

Skeptical_Squid11 · 5 points · Posted at 14:54:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He's assumed to be a prick because you see him more without his Pokémon and just being an ass to Ash. IIRC, but he did end up being a Pokémon professor like Oak so, it's hard for me to see him being a dick to his Pokémon.

SteampunkSamurai · 3 points · Posted at 14:55:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Plus I can't help but feel guilty for beating his ass after he just got done burying his Raticate.

HemanATMOTU · 9 points · Posted at 13:50:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also Michael Vick amirite

klakenkingi · 3 points · Posted at 15:08:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Metrosexual fruitcake Gary

BlitzMentalist · 2 points · Posted at 14:53:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or Paul and Ash mentality, for a somewhat better fit.

Thecolombianboy · 2 points · Posted at 15:48:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I believe this is more of Ash and Paul mentality, as Gary does care for his Pokemon

Derpyderp80000 · 1 points · Posted at 20:49:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

More like Ash and Paul.

PM_Me_Poptarts_ · 21 points · Posted at 13:38:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I would agree. And since we are talking about a fantasy world, I will throw out my conjecture. If it were me, Pokemon would be treated kind of like a barely in control tiger. Sure it can be lovey dovey. But that WarTurtle could also punch a whole clean through your chest cavity with a jet of water from its mouth. A healthy amount of fear and respect seems prudent. They are more than pets and more than fighters.

inincos · 13 points · Posted at 13:47:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You forgot that anime/cartoon characters have video game survival capability to the equivalent of an "easy" difficulty, so there's no need to treat them as anything else but a level 3 mudcrab.

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 13:54:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So like death incarnate?

I suck at videogames

PM_Me_Poptarts_ · 4 points · Posted at 14:21:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Meh. I was just trying to relate them to real life and how I would act. And a lvl 3 mudcrab would still easily murder me if I didn't have a weapon.

amaROenuZ · 1 points · Posted at 13:56:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well my Fire Chicken is both a fighter, and dinner.

TopherDaGopher · 1 points · Posted at 15:29:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Michael Vick mentality

E123-Omega · 1 points · Posted at 15:41:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Become food, one could not eat one's pet but could show it off.

HookEm2013 · 1 points · Posted at 17:55:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Calm down Michael Vick

Plasmabat · 1 points · Posted at 06:48:50 on April 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon are friends, pets, and soldiers under your command, all wrapped into one.

Lord_Viddax · 0 points · Posted at 14:17:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As pokemon: pocket monsters, they are not meant to be that cute and cuddly, more primal with a difference between humans and monsters/pokemon. The triangle eyes make them look more aggressive and driven, but also worthy of respect, while the round eyes are more human and soft. By being monsters, any kindness shown towards them has increased importance: Ash actually caring about those he trains means the stigma of monsters being evil or taboo is broken: Ash transcends the fear and hatred of the unknown or other. So my main point is that the early gen triangle eyes make the pokemon look like those you want to fight alongside, while the later round eyes look like those that are almost human and part of us.

Not really sure if even I understand where that is going.

papereel · 4 points · Posted at 14:42:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did you play gen 5? In those games, the theme is all about harmony with nature. 6 is about abusing that harmony, 7 is about outside forces threatening that harmony and some people who are willing to exploit them for personally gain, (with a lot of overtones of imperialism). Personally, I like the cute Pokémon, and firmly believe they can be cute and cool. And i think ones like Golurk, Noivern, and Golisopod still have that powerful/dangerous feel. I think of Pokémon in terms of the contests. There's tough, cool, smart, cute, and beautiful ones. And that's good because it means there's some for everyone!

Lord_Viddax · 2 points · Posted at 16:44:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I only played a tiny bit of Pokémon White, for some reason it just didn't appeal to me as much as the past games. I started with Pokémon Silver, but my favourite is Sapphire, even though I was old enough for Pokémon Red/Blue/Yellow I did not play them until recently (Yellow that is). I am really enjoying Pokémon 'Y' so far.

The newer versions just seem a bit too busy: too many intricate parts that overall make them too complex for my tastes. the irony being that the first 3 Gen Pokémon by being parodies of animals but classed as monsters look more natural, though may just be the Bit style artwork.

It is the age old gaming problem that some people will prefer the older and less sleek version than the new one!

Sweatybutthole · 3 points · Posted at 14:03:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like someone's on team Valor

Liamrc · 2 points · Posted at 14:07:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah the current ones look like NeoPets.

MrMulligan · 1 points · Posted at 14:50:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For most people in the pokemon world, they are pets. I think it completely makes sense to have the default look of an animal not be a grizzled fighter or angry.

creampielegacy · 1 points · Posted at 17:16:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

notpets

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:32:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokémonlivesmatter

tostitovenaar · 0 points · Posted at 13:27:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't this the whole mentality they're trying to move away from?

papereel · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd rather have family members than uncontrollable tools for destruction. Besides, it's not like they weren't pets and family members too in the original.

sandyravage7 · 92 points · Posted at 13:36:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea that's how you know to take DBZ characters seriously, like when Goku's eyes go from big and friendly to that angled out squint. You know some shit is about to go down.

jimthewanderer · 188 points · Posted at 13:31:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The first three generations actually seemed like quite dangerous stories with a young protagonist.

Cliche arguments inbound, but team rocket where fucking metal. They literally mutilated slowpokes, had extrortion rackets, and genuinely came across that they might seriously assault the PC if they lost a pokemon battle.

That and the legendaries felt like actual forces of nature, and didn't really care about humans unless they where behaving themselves.

They really jumped the shark with that God-is-pokemon nonsense.

AtomicBlackJellyfish · 78 points · Posted at 15:01:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In the most recent games, the villain has a library of frozen Pokémon that she keeps as trophies. Tell me that's not brutal.

EDIT: also in Y the villain tries to kill everyone with a giant laser.

TheFuzzyPickler · 34 points · Posted at 18:49:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's brutal, but it's anime brutal.

Giovanni was a crime boss whose gang stole and sold Pokémon.

Lusamine was obsessed with a jellyfish and wanted to travel to another dimension to be surrounded by them. And then she fused with one.

Plasmabat · 4 points · Posted at 06:52:31 on April 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

So it's more brutal because it's more relatable sort of? Like how if you see someone in a movie get a paper cut you'll feel that pain, but if you see someone get their head cut off you'll feel horror or shock, but have no way to relate to the pain?

I see what you're saying I think. So to follow this logic we need to scale back the scope of the story and make all problems extremely personal. Being psychologally abused, being physically assaulted, having your Pokemon hurt and being helpless to stop it, etc. Basically. Make the games edgy as fuck. I'm. Not sure if that's a good idea.

TF2Captain · 15 points · Posted at 14:59:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They really jumped the shark with that God-is-pokemon nonsense.

I feel like they're trying to figure out how to re-write this.

Yorkeworshipper · 3 points · Posted at 15:24:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They really jumped the shark with that God-is-pokemon nonsense.

Maybe humans are pokémon as well and Arceus is as much their god as the other pokémon's god.

PolyesterPoppycock · 12 points · Posted at 15:36:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

throws ultra ball at /u/Yorkeworshipper

Yorkeworshipper · 9 points · Posted at 15:40:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude, c'mon. Let me go, ffs, you're like the fifth, this week. I know, I look like mankee, but please.

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 17:40:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A book in the Canalave Library (in the Sinnoh games) seems to support your idea

There once were Pokémon that became very close to humans. There once were humans and Pokémon that ate together at the same table. It was a time when there existed no differences to distinguish the two.

Derpyderp80000 · 2 points · Posted at 20:56:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also when translated one books starts talking about marriages.

NihilsticEgotist · 4 points · Posted at 16:29:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Have you played Sun/Moon? It has the darkest main game and two villains that rival Giovanni for the best in the series.

papereel · 10 points · Posted at 14:48:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I completely disagree. I love having more lore to the Pokémon universe and being able to explain exactly how things came to be. I like having explanations. And anyway, those stories are legends, that's why they're legendary Pokémon. Not necessarily truths. Humans have legends about giant birds being the sun and creating the earth. It doesn't mean that's how things went down. And think gen 5 had a great story with dangerous villains, who, for once, actually had an ideology that made sense. It was concrete and imo the only team in the series with a sensible plan and code of ethics.

Goretantath · 4 points · Posted at 14:31:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i agree with everything cept that last sentence. Arceus is bad ass, if they had just gone through with the azure flute then people would realise...

Mnstrzero00 · 3 points · Posted at 18:45:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well in japaneses culture there are multiple gods. A god being a pokemon isn't that crazy in a world with pokemon. There are multiple pokemon gods responsible for the creation of the earth, time. It seems like you're saying that they are making the Abrahamic god a pokemon because otherwise I don't see there being anything to object to.

frozenpandaman · 3 points · Posted at 20:20:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Afaik not everyone in Japan is even religious, much less the same in terms of what they believe, but I get what you're going for. :P

Mnstrzero00 · 2 points · Posted at 22:28:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

not saying that people genuinely believe in them but multiple gods and are just part of the pop culture in Japan.

frozenpandaman · 1 points · Posted at 02:07:52 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I guess that's true to a certain extent. Or definitely more true than in what we consider Western culture.

jimthewanderer · 1 points · Posted at 16:21:37 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

It seems like you're saying that they are making the Abrahamic god a pokemon

I have absolutely no idea how you managed to divine such meaning from what was written.

otherwise I don't see there being anything to object to.

Other than it being a shark jumping stupidity that wrote them into a corner.

Mnstrzero00 · 1 points · Posted at 19:13:27 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Im thinking he's either saying it's weird in the context of a single god theory or weird in the context in a multiple god theory. I don't see how another god could be weird in the latter context.

dodadoBoxcarWilly · 3 points · Posted at 13:36:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

God-is-Pokemon? What's that all about?

jimthewanderer · 25 points · Posted at 13:46:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
fluffygryphon · 18 points · Posted at 13:38:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Some of the eyes make the pokemon look eerily vacant and lifeless, too.

PPDeezy · 9 points · Posted at 13:32:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. Seriously felt like the new eyes lacked any form of conciousness.

Retardedclownface · 6 points · Posted at 13:08:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eyes are the difference between a Pokémon saying "Hitmonchan..." or "Hitmonchan!!"

eggn00dles · 3 points · Posted at 14:23:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look more generic with the newer eyes as well.

papereel · 2 points · Posted at 14:49:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think they look cuter 👀

bilobisuper · 5 points · Posted at 13:20:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Jon_Bloodspray · 1 points · Posted at 15:16:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Welp, now I'm late for work.

norcaljosh · 2 points · Posted at 13:57:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Strong Pokemon, weak Pokémon. That's only the selfish perception of people.

MittensSlowpaw · 1 points · Posted at 06:21:01 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly and I prefer the older eyes due to that. You actually feel like you could win with that Pokemon and go the distance. I mean I get the whole pure friendship thing all the time but I preferred the bonding in battle friendship better.

The new eyes just scream cute plush thing you keep around to pretend you could battle.

KingAdamXVII · 289 points · Posted at 12:44:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I know nothing other than Big Round Eyes = cute; Narrow Slanting Downward Eyes = angry.

s3bbi · 121 points · Posted at 13:34:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's more the difference between Predator and Prey eyes.
http://stateschronicle.com/predator-or-prey-its-all-in-the-eyes-13761.html

If the eyes look more like predator eyes we as humans will assume they are more agressive or dangerous.

AlfredoTony · 17 points · Posted at 14:11:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 Pokémon are the predator alpha Pokémon.

InfinitelyAbysmal · 4 points · Posted at 15:22:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That was a really interesting article. Thanks for posting that!

ManetherenRises · 4 points · Posted at 20:27:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tl;DR - horizontal pupils and side mounted eyes are bad at pinpointing an object, but good at spotting movement. Horses have large horizontal pupils with eyes set to the side of their head to give a nearly 360* view at all times. (Most large domesticated animals. Sheep, cows, horses, donkeys, etc)

Narrow pupils and front facing eyes give excellent depth perception, helping to spot moving prey and tell how far away they are. (Alligators, snakes, ambush predators generally)

Rounded pupils and front facing eyes give good depth perception and pinpoint vision, helping to spot camouflaged prey and judge the distance. (Humans, dogs)

Goodra has side mounted, large pupils, which look like the pupils of prey. Onix has front mounted narrow pupils, which looks like an ambush predator.

Rickyrojay · 2 points · Posted at 15:08:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the new ones look like neopets, the old ones look badass

Toofcraka · 100 points · Posted at 12:47:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well the human brain is extremely geared towards noticing small details, this level of detail goes up when recognizing people, and then goes into even more detail on faces. This is also why we have the uncanny valley, because the robots/animations aren't able to perfectly mimic human behavior and we can pick up on it even if we don't realize it, and it makes us feel uncomfortable. This is also true, to a slightly lesser degree, for animals and characters, which may be why the change of Pokemon eye shapes is something​ that went by relatively unnoticed, but still gives the feeling of unfamiliarity or discomfort.

aoifhasoifha · 5 points · Posted at 13:32:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Theoretically large, round eyes are better at showing microexpressions (small expressions [duh] that we can't control and that humans are programmed to notice subconciously, like the body language of your face) just because they're bigger- things like a slight change in the size of pupil, or tightening of muscles around the eye, etc. are all easier to notice on big, round butts eyes which gives the impression of being earnest and trustworthy. This is why babies and puppies seem like they have nothing to hide and immediately strike us innocent, and it also triggers our innate protective or humanitarian instincts.

This is supposedly one of the reasons that blue/light colored eyes are considered attractive- the contrast allows the pupil and eye in general to be 'read' more easily.

Yakora · 4 points · Posted at 13:07:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Eyes is the first place humans look at when observing a creature or another human, even if for just a second. As a result here you are seeing something different than you are used to right off the bat, causing the piece to be unfamiliar. I am an illustrator and work with humanoid beings a lot, so this is always something I have to keep in mind.

SiberDrac · 3 points · Posted at 13:37:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very much so. The highest correlating feature between the success of a first date and appearance alone is the distance between the two folks' eyes on their respective faces. On top of that, humans feel a natural sense of love/protection/sympathy/comfort towards creatures with features like that of a human baby: big forehead; relatively round, large eyes compared to the face; big head compared to the body; shapeless limbs; and of course that charming, infant smile. Finally, and this is true of girls way more than guys, studies show people are capable of intuiting emotion from the eyes and a small surrounding area alone; so you put the enormous power your brain has devoted to facial recognition u/Toofcraca mentioned (consider humans' tendency to look away from other people while thinking hard or remembering - it's to shut down all that facial recognition activity), you take one look at the eyes on these pokèmon and make a snap judgment about their personality and approachability. And companies absolutely use this intentionally - think Mickey Mouse, Teddy bears, and Literally Every Pixar Character.

Token_Why_Boy · 3 points · Posted at 14:16:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

People are throwing real-world human body science at you and not acknowledging the animation aspect of it.

Here's TV Tropes on "Good Eyes, Evil Eyes" that explains a lot of the phenomenon.

nLotus · 2 points · Posted at 13:44:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
bilobisuper · 1 points · Posted at 13:31:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, Americans like aggressiveness and manliness so the eyes from "Now" look weak and childish. It's a culture thing.

drrrraaaaiiiinnnnage · 1 points · Posted at 14:09:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just in general? I believe both men and women are more attracted to a positive medial canthal tilt but seems to be more important for females. There's more but not much I can say for sure

Snook4life · 1 points · Posted at 14:09:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just think about when you are angry and you squint your eyes at your enemy, now think of your eyes when you see a pair of boobs

abarrelofmankeys · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm pretty sure there have been studies like this done for cars. Cars with more "fierce" (which seems to be angular grilles and headlights) grill designs are perceived as more powerful if I remember correctly.

Here we go http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/for-experts-cars-really-do-have-faces-57005307/

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:52:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is my theory of why they have particular eye shapes, not our perception of them.

Maybe predators have more angular eyes so they can focus on fast moving, escaping prey, whilst more docile animals have large, oculus eyes in order to spot predators amongst foliage.

Inquisitor1 · 1 points · Posted at 14:58:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kirby has pokemon eyes while in america

PabloFlexscobar · 1 points · Posted at 15:04:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eyes tell a lot about what someone is feeling or thinking, no source because I'm too lazy, but I'm definitely right, trust me.

ghostdate · 1 points · Posted at 15:27:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Definitely is.

I don't really know the whys of it, but things like downward slanting eyes come across as sympathetic, upward slanting comes across as devious. Rounder eyes are associated with softness, while more angular ones, as in the 1st generation comes across as intense or powerful -- which I think is the biggest thing here, the newer mons are trying to look cuter, while the first gen was trying to get across that they're monsters and they're ready to battle.

geetarooman · 1 points · Posted at 16:46:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

there is! the tl;dr of it is that humans are generally attracted to symmetrical and larger eyes. The roundness in eyes is associated with youth generally and seen as attractive for that reason

clusterlove · 1 points · Posted at 17:15:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Big eyes sell more toys. That's why characters on cereal boxes have big eyes.

Protocal_NGate · 1 points · Posted at 13:23:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They did the same thing to kirby over here in NA too. They gave him angry eyes for the marketing appeal

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · 1 points · Posted at 14:48:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Except OP cherry picked the new generations so hard.

ryoushi19 · 1 points · Posted at 16:50:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The new eyes don't really bother me, though, and on some of the Pokemon the old eyes just look angry. Are most of us Americans just really averse to cute things? Is this why Kirby is always angry on US box art?

Zonino2000 · 833 points · Posted at 11:30:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Beware Normally: "I'm a cute stuffed animal with a dangerous hug, look out!"

Beware with Gengar eyes: "Are you ready to die? It is no less than you deserve".

adamskij · 304 points · Posted at 12:40:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kinda defeats the purpose of the Pokémon though, doesn't it? Bewear's entire schtick is that it looks cute and harmless but will kill you painfully.

WhyNotThinkBig · 121 points · Posted at 12:47:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep, when it crushes you to death. :D

It's actually supposed to do it on accident, because it's doesn't know it's strength.

Telekineticism · 113 points · Posted at 13:13:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Basically Lennie from Of Mice and Men as a Pokemon.

yifftionary · 44 points · Posted at 13:45:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just want'd to pet the Bunnelbies George, I dinn mean it.

PabloSeshcobar · 1 points · Posted at 16:23:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

GOD FUCKING DAMNIT LENNIE YOU CLUMSY PIECE OF SHIT

Jabeebaboo · 5 points · Posted at 14:14:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What about the rabbits George?

Danger-Wolf · 4 points · Posted at 14:04:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jots down nickname idea...

Flashyshooter · 1 points · Posted at 18:56:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I could see someone creating an animation about this it would be hilarious.

poptart2nd · 16 points · Posted at 13:18:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

sure but that's just one example. it's not the point of every current-gen pokemon to look cute until it kills you painfully.

Deranged_Hermit · 1 points · Posted at 16:43:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hi Mimikyu!

oddjobbber · 6 points · Posted at 14:22:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, maybe the demonic stoner eyes of gengar weren't the best choice for a literal teddy bear

Qbounsy · 4 points · Posted at 13:38:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Quite similar to South Park's Christmas critters

jdragon3 · 2 points · Posted at 14:56:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL Cartman accidentally did pokemon better than pokemon

LuminalGrunt2 · 2 points · Posted at 12:30:56 on June 23, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's fucking 6'11" holy shit that's scary

Bretin23 · 2 points · Posted at 13:56:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's eyes should look harmless to lure them in, then change and glow red when it's attacking.

LittleIslander · 5 points · Posted at 15:56:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The idea is that the death hugs aren't intentional though, it can't control its own strength.

Bretin23 · 1 points · Posted at 18:15:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ohh

Flashyshooter · 1 points · Posted at 18:55:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It could be like Jigglypuff in the anime. One moment it's nice and it snaps and tries to kill you. I think that would be good too.

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 15:08:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, the point was we had bad ass Pokemon. Now have Beanie babies.

ryegye24 · 0 points · Posted at 15:44:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can you say it defeats the point when it's the original art style?

Namagem · 1 points · Posted at 09:42:06 on April 21, 2017 · (Permalink)

Implying that different art styles that serve different purposes can't exist

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 12:38:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Bewear that r/pokemon deserves...

setfire3 · 1 points · Posted at 15:59:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tentacruel Normally: "I amma fucking shank you."

Tentacruel with whatever eyes: "pls don't hurt me, I am only here to get stoned. :("

PeterLicht · 0 points · Posted at 17:46:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New ones kinda look like they were meant for a mobile game. Just cute and shit. Clash of the Pokemans.

[deleted] · 957 points · Posted at 10:33:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It actually looks like it is one of the older pokemon, when you change the eyes.

travelers_memoire · 193 points · Posted at 12:32:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I go from what is this, to omg my childhood!

-GWM- · 53 points · Posted at 13:03:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seriously. Goodra looks like it aged 20 years

marsephel · 6 points · Posted at 19:15:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And greninja looks 200% more badass

TryingOutaFakeName · 1 points · Posted at 18:50:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And, if you change the eyes, they don't look like the new pokemon anymore.

[deleted] · 1077 points · Posted at 10:27:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow this really demonstrates OP's point well!

Senor_Taco29 · 218 points · Posted at 12:38:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It really does, I thought OP was full of shit at first but wow, it changes it completely

[deleted] · 214 points · Posted at 12:39:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TBH I still hate OP though

[deleted] · 230 points · Posted at 13:06:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As is tradition.

SamJakes · 3 points · Posted at 14:09:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It is known

SHAMPOOCHIEF · 1 points · Posted at 14:24:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Make it so

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 14:31:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Turn the lights off

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 14:31:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Carry me home

cormamin101 · 2 points · Posted at 14:12:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So say we all.

imakevoicesformycats · 81 points · Posted at 13:38:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love his mom, though.

_tenac__23 · 111 points · Posted at 13:40:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As is tradition.

tsnErd3141 · 8 points · Posted at 13:54:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because my arms are broken

MuffaloMan · 2 points · Posted at 14:05:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And every night I break my legs...

Bwazo · 2 points · Posted at 14:42:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Every damn thread..

Bwazo · 5 points · Posted at 14:43:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As is tradition

hyperinfinity11 · 1 points · Posted at 14:12:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

EVERY. THREAD.

hpstr-doofus · 1 points · Posted at 16:40:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love bang his mom, though.

FTFY

Asphyxiatinglaughter · 1 points · Posted at 14:21:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey OP! EAT SHIT!

DaClems · 2 points · Posted at 13:46:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Deary diary,

OP was not a piece of shit today.

crazedhatter · 2 points · Posted at 18:13:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wasn't sold until seeing the transformation clearly. That said, I've not really had as much trouble with the ones that were changed. Where Pokemon bothers me the most is the non creature stuff - the Keychain, the Sword (Though I've learned to love that bastard), the gears... just all seems really weird to me.

Flying_Door · 108 points · Posted at 10:11:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

more pls

altmetalkid · 31 points · Posted at 10:52:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not ragging on the guy who made the first three, but compared to those, these ones are much more believable by far

[deleted] · 185 points · Posted at 10:19:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy fuck OP was right, this is the only thing that sucks about new Pokemons

papereel · 4 points · Posted at 14:53:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I personally prefer it. It showed me why I find the originals harder to love and more lifeless though.

Formber · 4 points · Posted at 14:02:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well don't let the eyes distract you from the fact that one of those is a fucking ice cream cone...

LiterallyKesha · 23 points · Posted at 14:26:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And one of those is sludge or a pile of eggs...oh wait those are pokemon that were part of the first few so they get a pass..

GlyphGryph · -2 points · Posted at 14:37:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A sludge and a pile of eggs are both much better than an ice cream cone though.

papereel · 17 points · Posted at 14:52:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

1) No they're not 2) The first gen literally had THREE separate Pokémon that were literally just purple sludge with arms. Grimer, Muk, and Ditto. Edit: spelling

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 15:01:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You can't really count Ditto that's one of the most unique Pokemon and his design is almost never seen anyway. For instance, I love that fairy Pikachu from the new games even if it's a weird idea. But keys, lawn mower, etc I think are just too random. As are my criteria for judging said randomness.

papereel · 4 points · Posted at 16:34:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can really count ditto. His mechanics are unique. His design is not unique, even within his own generation. At face value, he's little more than a cuter version of Grimer. And my point is that if we can all love 3 purple goo blobs from the same gen, then why can't we love a fairy who steals keys, ghost lightning that inhabits appliances, etc?

Worm-Dog · 6 points · Posted at 15:17:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair the lawn mower is an electric ghost inhabiting household items

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:30:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aight that's all right. Still it could've inhabited something a bit less... inconvenient?

Worm-Dog · 3 points · Posted at 17:09:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol it has 5 different forms, one of which is the lawn mower, others include a washing machine and a fan, take it for what you will :p

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 17:10:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

All right that's pretty cool

Icalasari · 2 points · Posted at 20:03:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

On things like keys (and even including things like Voltorb just being a Pokeball), that's a culture clash issue. Japan has a kind of spirit/monster in their mythology where, of an object has survived long enough, it gains a soul. So they have stories of living sandals, umbrellas, and so on

So not really random, just that North American and Western mythology in general doesn't tend to have the objects themselves as alive

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 21:22:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah to be fair, after thinking about it, I think it's mostly the eyes that make me dislike normal Pokemen, probably a byproduct of the early gens being my favs.

GlyphGryph · 2 points · Posted at 15:09:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grimer and Muk are different evolutions of the same pokemon so it really doesn't make sense to count them separately. Also, they were essentially "pollution elements" and had a really strong thematic element in addition to managing to look cool and have a good design despite being a pile of sludge.

papereel · 3 points · Posted at 16:31:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree. I like them, personally. I also think people's arbitrary decisions about what they consider good or bad design is often blind to the reality. If 3 purple sludge balls can be beloved Pokémon, why not ice cream? Why not a digital ghost that inhabits many different objects?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:59:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had only seen the first :(

Formber · 1 points · Posted at 16:13:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They were cool with me until I saw that. Lol

one_love_silvia · -1 points · Posted at 16:17:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't let the eyes distract you from the fact that the Falcons gave up a 25 point lead.

iamme9878 · -2 points · Posted at 14:01:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aside from the fact that they made garbage, keys and a lawn mower Pokémon.

FUCK_TINY_HANDS · 24 points · Posted at 14:06:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A literal pile of ooze and a ball is so much better.

iamme9878 · 13 points · Posted at 14:08:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hell Yeah! And the multiple birds, dogs and cats!

walrusman64 · 6 points · Posted at 14:21:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cant forget such imaginative monsters as literally a purple snake, literally a mouse but its purple, and of course, ball but upside down

Yes some of the newer designs arent that good, but guess what gen 1 had pretty shitty designs too.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 14:59:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks, I didn't know about the lawn mower Jesus Christ

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 19:46:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 19:51:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah I got that from the other 3 commenters that said so, thanks

iamme9878 · 2 points · Posted at 15:41:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a rotom variant

Harry101UK · 4 points · Posted at 18:33:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, Gen1 had balls, balls with magnets , a pile of eggs and a pitcher plant.

[deleted] · -22 points · Posted at 12:32:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

WhyNotThinkBig · 41 points · Posted at 12:48:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right. Names like "Ekans" were such complex and awesome. It's like... snake backwards.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:49:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah but it actually sounded fucking cool "EKANS" nowadays all Pokemon have names like Robodairo or Oronoico they're not as catchy. Same reason I think Dota 2's more normal Alchemist or Juggernaut names are better than LoL's Yuralai or Handel which are just random letters or names

WhyNotThinkBig · 23 points · Posted at 13:02:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right. "Seel" the Seal was so catchy. "Garchomp" or "Zygarde" or even "Rowlet" are too hard to pronounce.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 13:22:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ironically enough my favourite name in the entirety of the Pokeverse is Gyarados. But I do think it just sounds fucking cool, might be nostalgia.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 14:38:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 14:54:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I honestly also made up the second name so I'm surprised it's an actual Pokemon but anyway, I've played quite a bit of newer gens, and I really didn't click with some of the designs. Like porygon was weird as fuck, but he was also quite unique I thought, meanwhile the last game I played or the one before that had a keyrring? as a pokemon. Honestly, I still loved the game, but the Pokemon designs not so much and although it might be nostalgia I cannot remove that nostalgia from my opinion.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 14:57:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 15:04:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I played the games before Sun and Moon, X and Y. I do not care if you doubt this, but I finished the version of the Pokemon League those games have. I was very impressed by the battles, some of the camera angles they chose and the amount of stuff you could do, but the Pokemons and their design did not stick in my mind at all. I just remember the one that was a buncha keys and my ninja frog (Greninja?), every other Pokemon I don't remember.

WhyNotThinkBig · 3 points · Posted at 13:34:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gyarados is a good Pokemon IMO. It's top tier (along with Arcanine)

Namagem · 6 points · Posted at 13:41:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Intimidate meta

WhyNotThinkBig · 1 points · Posted at 15:08:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The VGC has Arcanine in one of the top spots

huzaifa96 · 2 points · Posted at 16:46:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's because (unlike a lot of the names mentioned here), Gyarados was the character's actual name, & in part because it's a foreign name it just sounds cool.

Nerdy314159265 · 1 points · Posted at 13:34:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rowlet sounds too much like someone saying Growlithe incorrectly.

WhyNotThinkBig · 1 points · Posted at 15:11:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what I thought when they revealed him. :P

Also there's the Pokemon "Aegislash," "Rotom," "Tyranitar," "Gardevoir," and "Greninja"

trust_me_imma_doctor · 1 points · Posted at 13:16:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Zygarde the zygote

RellenD · 7 points · Posted at 13:23:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are no Pokemon or league of legends characters with the names you're attacking here.

[deleted] · -7 points · Posted at 13:26:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah I forgot to specify, those are just what the names on those games look like to me. Lol Champion names are just stupid though, these are the first on the list: "Aatrox" "Ahri" "Akali" "Alistar" "Amumu" other than Alistar they're all just letters put together to sound cool/goofy/menacing/cute

Akuuntus · 6 points · Posted at 13:52:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what all names are

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 14:00:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really, a lot of LoL names like "Miss Fortune", "Twisted Fate" and some others are actually pretty cool, but I like my fantasy names to have some rules attached to them. Harry Potter, LotR, hell even Star Wars (which is space fantasy more than sci-fi) all have some naming conventions that make sense and they tend to stick to them. With LoL, and maybe due to the poorness of the Lore, and again not every hero just most, names just seem as if someone went "What's a cool name?" "dude T'aix K'hamax sounds super awesome it's got a lot of xs which are cool".

Horizon96 · 2 points · Posted at 15:17:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

LoLs characters all actually have names and titles, such as Poppy, Keeper of the Hammer. That's the naming convention every character follows, name and title. Even characters which are referred by their alias such as Twisted Fate have an actual name, which in his case is Tobias Foxtrot. Most fantasy universes will have names not ever used in real life, doesn't detract from them. There is also variety of races and cultures in LoLs lore and the names do quite often match the place the champion came from. Such as the Yordles having more whimsical names like Lulu or Poppy and Piltover characters having more real world names like Jayce or Caitlyn. The otherworldly champions that come from the void like Vel'Koz or Kha'Zix tend to have the much weirder, sharper sounding names. There are naming conventions in LoL, just because you aren't aware of them doesn't mean they don't exist.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 15:29:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aight I retract myself then, I shall not be throwing stupid names as one of the things LoL does wrong. Thanks for the info!

Horizon96 · 2 points · Posted at 15:42:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No worries and trust me as a long time LoL player there is plenty I think the game does wrong as well.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:18:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you want to try something different that still does some things wrong but increasingly less so, I'd love to help you get into Dota. It's at the point where I think it would be the easiest for a LoL player to get into it since the meta is a lot more teamfight than efficiency oriented this time around. It's just a very very difficult and mechanically complex game compared to LoL but if you get over the hurdle I think it's way more satisfying.

Horizon96 · 2 points · Posted at 17:33:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks for the offer but the only reason I play a moba anymore is because I find it fun with friends and I definitely know the ones still playing LoL wouldn't make the jump. I also just don't have the same amount of free time that I had when I learned LoL and learning a moba is a hefty time investment.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 18:33:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aight that's okay I'm sort of like Dota's Jehoba's witness but I can take a no

one_love_silvia · 3 points · Posted at 16:22:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Akali is the romanized version of akari, which means light. Its not just a random name.

DirtyDan257 · 37 points · Posted at 11:25:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love the Rockruff change but I feel like the other two are supposed to look cuter and the eyes kind of take away from that. Especially Bewear who is literally supposed to be a cuddly (but overly powerful) teddy bear.

papereel · 8 points · Posted at 14:54:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah I'd rather have adorable best friend rockruff than a mad puppy that wants to bite off your face. They don't all have to be edgy

domeforaklondikebar · 3 points · Posted at 14:58:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And mixing Tentacruel's eyes with Fomantis of all Pokemon, and saying it proves the other point is stupid.

LittleIslander · 1 points · Posted at 16:02:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Tentacruel looks better than most of them IMO, although to be faire it doesn't entirely fit something called Tentacruel.

Goretantath · 1 points · Posted at 14:33:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the bird looks right though..

troyareyes · 1 points · Posted at 15:01:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wanna see Charmander or gigglypuff eyes shopped on the new Pokemon just for reference.

BukkitGod · 18 points · Posted at 11:01:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like everyone's choosing the wrong Pokemon to do this to.

Berlchicken · 7 points · Posted at 11:04:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Give me a request then bro.

BukkitGod · 8 points · Posted at 11:08:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Try either of Lycanroc's forms. They look cool but the roundness to their eyes doesn't make them seem aggressive enough.

Berlchicken · 4 points · Posted at 11:33:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Done, see what you think.

BukkitGod · 1 points · Posted at 11:41:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The shape is good, but the colour should remain. Pretty good job, bro.

N-Bizzle · 2 points · Posted at 13:29:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It works on greninja

ImPretendingToCare · 5 points · Posted at 12:21:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That looks so much better !!!

PostmodernPurist · 6 points · Posted at 10:50:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It looks so much better imo

Kikmi · 3 points · Posted at 12:24:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

These are excellent, person of the internet. You have my awe.

wickedblight · 3 points · Posted at 12:33:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, they all look like significantly better.

Hypermeme · 3 points · Posted at 12:54:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I gotta some pokemon like Greninja look WAY better with old pokemon eyes. But Pokemon like Bewear definitely look better with the new eyes.

_tenac__23 · 3 points · Posted at 13:39:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

These look awesome! well done man.

mephedaw · 3 points · Posted at 14:29:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is gonna be a buzzfeed article tommorow.

Redditor changes Pokemon eye shapes and you won't believe the difference!

Naratik · 4 points · Posted at 12:18:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

holy shit they look so much better why is this comment buried here?!

Berlchicken · 3 points · Posted at 12:22:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I made my post 15 mins after the guy above me :P

slothsandbadgers · 4 points · Posted at 12:23:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit. Maybe it's just my taste but they look much better with the old-style eyes.

papereel · 1 points · Posted at 14:54:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think they look better with the new ones with the exception of greninja

metalflygon08 · 2 points · Posted at 12:32:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lycanrock looks better, but I think Bewear looks too natural now.

ourladyunderground · 2 points · Posted at 12:49:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What did you do to my rockruff

Berlchicken · 2 points · Posted at 12:49:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I fucked his shit up, boyo

ourladyunderground · 2 points · Posted at 12:51:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but why my smol rock pupper

Lyratheflirt · 2 points · Posted at 14:53:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lycanroc with those eyes actually look legit.

gatemansgc · 2 points · Posted at 16:05:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are awesome

tertiusiii · 2 points · Posted at 17:51:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
  1. oricorio needs her coffee

  2. looks like goodra is done taking shit from florges

  3. this one actually works really well. does indeed look more like a pokemon

  4. probably the best looking one of these

  5. oh dear god

  6. greninja gets the most improved award, but now the fold on his stomach looks like a mouth

  7. vanillite has seen things. terrible things.

  8. i can't tell whether that makes it cuter or scarier

captainedwinkrieger · 2 points · Posted at 18:48:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Greninja edit is beautiful.

Eman5805 · 2 points · Posted at 12:27:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Greninja looks a billion times better.

der_milkes · 1 points · Posted at 11:26:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Guess that Bewear will creep the shit out of kids

The_Price_Is_White · 1 points · Posted at 11:33:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dammit they look so much better!

Jonny727272 · 1 points · Posted at 12:10:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If Bewear wasn't scary enough you just made him nightmare material.

TheAllbrother · 1 points · Posted at 12:12:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

OP was right, it's the eyes

Junho_C · 1 points · Posted at 12:12:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The last one made me chortle. 🤣

therealsouthflorida · 1 points · Posted at 12:15:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The bewear got me good! Great work!

venusar200 · 1 points · Posted at 12:28:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah that makes all of the difference

A-Dog-Named-Jim · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Anddddd they look much better with the old style eyes

shadowridrs · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude they look awesome.

Hurley9009 · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I actually love Greninja but that edit......So good

_____KALROG · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This works so well I kind of wonder if it is intentional. Maybe the artists thought it was really important that the newer generations be somehow visually distinguished from the older hundreds of pokemon.

Especially considering their skill at targeting their current market of youth. I think it might make it a little easier to understand the concept of there being different regions each with a totally different series of pokemon. I can totally see the pokemon company being concerned and not knowing what to do about the fact they want to release new pokemons and games but there are already thousands of pokemon their fan base may not be fluent in at all.

If this were the case it could actually make sense that the pokemon might be slightly morphed (e. g. eye shape) depending on their region. Damn now i kinda sound racist. I think you guys get what I mean though

sparky662 · 3 points · Posted at 12:52:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So what you're saying is the the Japanese based regions local Pokemon have narrow pointy eyes, but the western based regions have big round eyes. Actually, thinking about it, that's kind of true.

LittleIslander · 1 points · Posted at 16:04:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't that a Western stereotype though? I don't think that's how the Japanese think of it.

sparky662 · 1 points · Posted at 16:20:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No idea. This post was more of a joke than anything else.

originalgrapeninja · 1 points · Posted at 12:42:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's really interesting! It seems that I greatly prefer the old eyes!

masteryoyo28 · 1 points · Posted at 12:46:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can't believe the difference this makes!

Thank_You_Love_You · 1 points · Posted at 12:46:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow they look SO MUCH BETTER

MarkoSeke · 1 points · Posted at 12:50:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rockruff is a great example.

That Bewear is the stuff of nightmares xD

greeklolz15 · 1 points · Posted at 12:53:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The line on Greninja's stomach looks like a mouth making the whole body look like a face.

Atmosck · 1 points · Posted at 12:54:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It blos my mind that your version isn't the real Greninja.

Cr0w33 · 1 points · Posted at 12:54:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Greninja looks much better with old eyes

Commanderluna · 1 points · Posted at 13:00:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That probably explains why I like the new Pokemon so much because I want my fluffy soft Pokemon like Vulpix.

xRyuzakii · 1 points · Posted at 13:01:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow they look significantly better with the old eyes

Nitro_Indigo · 1 points · Posted at 13:04:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I honestly like edited Midday Lycanroc a lot better, though I still like the original.

HereComesPapaArima · 1 points · Posted at 13:05:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only Greninja looks better in the new style.

wastelandavenger · 1 points · Posted at 13:07:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh wow, you made them look like pokemon! I wish this could be a mod.

BlamefulWorm435 · 1 points · Posted at 13:08:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They all looked amazing! Except bewear. I don't think there's much anyone can do for bewear

Unic0rnBac0n · 1 points · Posted at 13:08:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I kinda wish I would've never seen that. What could have been.

WillOnlyGoUp · 1 points · Posted at 13:08:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yup they all look better with the old eyes, though more aggressive.

tadayou · 1 points · Posted at 13:09:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is extremely amazing. Such a small detail that totally changes the feel of these Pokémon. Awww, wish Game Freak would see the error of their ways!

mc_md · 1 points · Posted at 13:09:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh my god. It actually is entirely the eyes. OP vindicated in the most awesome way.

bluefrogwithredhands · 1 points · Posted at 13:11:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This makes me happy and sad.

cuspacecowboy86 · 1 points · Posted at 13:11:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice work, these look great, it's amazing hoelw much of a difference it makes!

Oracle343gspark · 1 points · Posted at 13:14:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great job! Rockruff and Greninja look so much better with old eyes.

Jsmallz14 · 1 points · Posted at 13:16:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What a world of difference. Seriously great job!

BaronRaichu · 1 points · Posted at 13:20:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh man, I like the look of the old eyes version so much more. OP was right.

RellenD · 1 points · Posted at 13:21:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That rockruff

Walkerbaiit · 1 points · Posted at 13:23:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Woah. You've really driven the point home with these. Great job, I hope you inspire changes to the next generation of Pokemon.

Berlchicken · 1 points · Posted at 13:24:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol! Imagine!

Kane111122 · 1 points · Posted at 13:24:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rockruff and Greninja look great! Nice job!

jrsooner · 1 points · Posted at 13:24:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tentacruel looks terrifying.

TheSideJoe · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ice cream cone gonna kick your ass

Amadeusdavinci · 1 points · Posted at 13:30:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

jesus christ dude

Dameleon · 1 points · Posted at 13:31:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Remindme! 13 hours

browserz · 1 points · Posted at 13:31:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love the greninja! Awesome work man

SmaugTheGreat · 1 points · Posted at 13:33:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Please do Luxray!! <3

DLCBOB · 1 points · Posted at 13:35:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Somehow makes them look so much better

Oromis107 · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks for this. I really like old-eye Greninja

i8myWeaties2day · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man they look way better with the old eyes

Flecca · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thats awesome.

LaffeyTaffy · 1 points · Posted at 13:43:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is literally the direction pokemon should have gone

defnotacyborg · 1 points · Posted at 13:45:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tentacruel looks high af

Marthisuy · 1 points · Posted at 13:45:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This in incredible!!!

laur7620 · 1 points · Posted at 13:46:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Could do Marill? :)

Berlchicken · 3 points · Posted at 13:52:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm not gonna put it in the original post because I think Marill still counts as an older pokemon as it's only 2nd generation. But I am kind, so here you go

laur7620 · 1 points · Posted at 16:27:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you!!

codexcdm · 1 points · Posted at 13:47:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Greninja with Haunter eyes is awesome. TBH, Trentacruel with the round eyes works.

Snake3ater · 1 points · Posted at 13:47:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

pikachu with the triangular "old" eyes.

he was the cutest because his eyes were "new format". i want to see badass pikachu now!

Scubamesteve · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit. I clicked the link because I felt the theory held water.

But you've delivered to me buckets filled.

yosoywhatever · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's incredible.

It is bittersweet though, knowing the reason they look so odd to me is a real design choice.

xUsako · 1 points · Posted at 13:51:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pls sir, may I have some more?
http://i.imgur.com/LOIgGfK.jpg
(honestly, I'd try making some myself, but at this post it would probably look as if I'm doing it in hopes of getting gold or something)
(edited, cuz I was battling with learning how to use line break properly)

hiero_ · 1 points · Posted at 13:52:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, I actually really like Goodra with old eyes

TheGeralt85 · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is amazing and you did an amazing job

Bretin23 · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The round eyes make them look dumb and a little brainless.. they aren't focused or really even cognitive of what they're doing, just mindless poke-machines.

Bring the battle eyes back!

TheSemiotics · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit. This is EXACTLY what's wrong with the new ones for me and I had no idea. Thanks for making these.

Fader_209 · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Always thought Greninja looked awesome and then I see your shopped version of what could have been and now nothing in the world seems right any more.

ImNewToEverything · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Amazing work and idea!

effieSC · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks, those gifs managed to make me feel pretty nostalgic!! The shape of the eyes makes a huge difference! I actually like the eyes both ways, but as times change, so does art style!

JackAttack28 · 1 points · Posted at 13:54:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, this is actually so awesome. They definitely look better with the edited eyes. (old school)

Tyrantt_47 · 1 points · Posted at 13:55:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit. This is exactly why they don't feel the same

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:55:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That ice cream cone becomes a stone cold killer.

norcaljosh · 1 points · Posted at 13:56:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Beware the bewear!

Seriously him and the ice cream cone are now the stuff of nightmares.

mastersw999 · 1 points · Posted at 13:56:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The old eyes make them look more intense

ubergooner · 1 points · Posted at 14:02:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Vanilite reminds me of a menacing Butters

Tentacruel looks high as shit

Good job!

reicomatricks · 1 points · Posted at 14:02:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now do it in reverse, putting googly eyes on the old pokemon!

ydail · 1 points · Posted at 14:03:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Greninja looks much better with those eyes.

laser-TITS · 1 points · Posted at 14:03:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm convinced.

linwail · 1 points · Posted at 14:04:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh my god these are so much better.. What happened

Voidsabre · 1 points · Posted at 14:05:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mind blown

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:05:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love this can you do decidueye with whatever eyes u think appropriate

solicitorpenguin · 1 points · Posted at 14:10:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Way better with the edged eyes then the round ones. Except for that ice cream pokemon. Ice cream shouldn't be that angry

HowDoesARedditWork · 2891 points · Posted at 09:50:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ask and ye shall receive. :)

http://i.imgur.com/i58zqgU.png

http://i.imgur.com/4BxWlSi.png

http://i.imgur.com/2zTdYPH.png

I'm honestly having a blast doing these and I would love to do more but it's almost 3am and I am tired as heck. If you guys like them I can do more when I am not about to pass out.

EDIT: Someone (/u/IGELmitDEAGLE) asked for before versions of the pokemon so here they are.

Mudbray

Popplio

Palossand

[deleted] · 229 points · Posted at 10:16:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Would be interesting if you could use some of the old round eyes on pokemon like popilo; squirtle eyes

Or for mammals we have Raichu

Clefairy

Popillo looks a little too uncanny with triangular eyes. But it is interesting how the design aesthetic has gotten...rounder over the years.

jjacobsnd5 · 131 points · Posted at 10:46:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea Popplio doesn't work with the angry eyes. He's a starter, he needs cute eyes.

altmetalkid · 56 points · Posted at 10:51:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what I was thinking. Some people people were saying that they look better with the triangle eyes, that they actually look like Pokemon, but to me the triangle eyes contrast with art style a little too much.

bonafart · 2 points · Posted at 11:43:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aloha Persian now that is rouuund

power_of_friendship · 4 points · Posted at 12:46:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man, I was so pissed when I found out what Alohan persian looked like after my meowth evolved. (Going into the new games blind was a great idea btw)

whomad1215 · 2 points · Posted at 12:41:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pikachu has certainly gotten less round though.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:10:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's less fat...looks like a gerbil now.

SihvMan · 1710 points · Posted at 09:53:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shit. These are pretty good. Also, OP is right. Old eyes on new Pokemon works better.

DrLiamSeuss · 607 points · Posted at 10:23:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The art style in general is still different. They're starting to look like something from gen 3 or 4, but still pretty far from the feel of the first two gens.

Highly_Edumacated · 7 points · Posted at 11:11:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think people realize how simple some of the First Generation of Pokemon were, and I really think that simplicity is another cornerstone of the original artwork. Ken Sugimori was highly influenced by Akira Toriyama (Dragon Ball, Dragon Quest, Chrono Trigger) and it seemed like he dropped that influence in later generations. I found a pretty great breakdown of the eyes on human chacters here

DrLiamSeuss · 8 points · Posted at 11:17:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shading and facial shape is one thing that very much reflects on the Pokémon too. It feels like angles are constantly being replaced by rounder shapes, and much of the old style's jaggedness is disappearing.

Highly_Edumacated · 6 points · Posted at 11:23:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Almost like a reverse "Kirby is Hardcore."

hottoast16 · 7 points · Posted at 12:16:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for starting me on my long journey through tvtropes for the night. See you guys in 1000 years.

-I.C.Weiner

Highly_Edumacated · 2 points · Posted at 12:49:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My apologies Mr. Weiner. I hope you make it through the night, good luck

DrDiablo361 · 1 points · Posted at 19:18:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Last bit is Ohmura's artstyle. Ohmura draws most of the human characters now iirc

chelsea-vong · 225 points · Posted at 10:34:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That and I feel like they started running out of ideas for mons after gen 2-3. I mean really... a sandcastle?

Reinhart3 · 706 points · Posted at 10:47:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah seriously, what happened to the old design? Back when we had a pile of eggs. Or a magnet that evolved into 3 magnets stuck together. Or what about the purple pile of goo that evolved into a bigger pile of goo? Or the pokeball that evolved into a bigger pokeball. Or the rock that turns into a slightly bigger less smooth rock.

Aiwatcher · 69 points · Posted at 11:13:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

please don't make fun of my favorite pokemon, purple rat

kayonesoft · 9 points · Posted at 11:57:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think you mean greenish/gray rat, you heathen.

ParryDotter · 88 points · Posted at 11:01:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey now! He didn't turn into a bigger pokeball, he turned into a bigger up-side down pokeball!

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 14:08:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Indonesian flag evolved into Polish flag

Reinhart3 · 20 points · Posted at 11:03:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, that's a very big distinction. The sides with red and white swapped!!!! Truly these were some geniuses working at Nintendo

WeylandTheDwarf · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's the subtle things.

AlanMichel · 133 points · Posted at 10:55:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the point is that pokemon now a days look less aggressive. You know for the children.

codefreak8 · 12 points · Posted at 12:55:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The sandcastle's dex description says that it lures people in and takes control of them when they touch its mouth, then it sinks them into the sand and kills them.

AlanMichel · -3 points · Posted at 13:01:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That may be true but kids usually dont read pokedex entries. But if they do, we'll you got to start them young to learn about life and death. Also you gotta teach them not to go into the mouth of a sandcastle other wise they get engulfed.

OvercoatTurntable · 12 points · Posted at 13:39:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

kids usually dont read pokedex entries

Speak for yourself. It's not even like they have to go out of their way to find it, the descriptions show up right after you catch them.

ColoradoScoop · 24 points · Posted at 12:05:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget that pikachu was far and away their most popular character. Cute worked for them, even in Gen 1. I think that heavily influenced their designs going forward.

[deleted] · 21 points · Posted at 12:43:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

TheFuzzyPickler · 3 points · Posted at 18:59:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is why every Pikachu ripoff doesn't work.

I had to google the one from gen 6 because Dedenne was just too unmemorable.

SidewaysInfinity · 1 points · Posted at 20:06:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A rougher, meaner pikaclone might actually work in Gen 8. Mimikyu and Togedemaru have pretty much cornered the "cute Pikachu imitation" market, so nothing else can really compete.

TheFuzzyPickler · 2 points · Posted at 20:40:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's literally a Sonichu Pokemon.

There's no other place they can take it.

SOS-Brigade · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:25 on June 23, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pikachu was the main pokemon in the show, you can't say Pikachu was the most popular just cause of cuteness. Pikachu was put in the spotlight of the show and Ash's was a tough ass motherfucker. Correlation doesn't imply causation.

Reinhart3 · 105 points · Posted at 11:01:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's just because OP cherry picked on both sides. Also "I feel like they started running out of ideas for mons" doesn't really have anything to do with aggressiveness.

LtLabcoat · 86 points · Posted at 11:09:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's just because OP cherry picked on both sides.

Not really. Gen1 had a LOT of angry eyes.

pwines14 · 7 points · Posted at 13:43:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But there are still plenty with not angry eyes, just take a look at a pokedex

Cloudey · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah but the pokemon that were meant to be "cute" had them, Now way more of them have the circular eyes

Robustss · 1 points · Posted at 11:24:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They battle each other it evolves around aggression

AcaresOfCloudCity · 8 points · Posted at 11:13:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Woah woah, that pokeball evolved into a bigger pokeball AND switched the colors

_gamadaya_ · 8 points · Posted at 11:50:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've seen a lot of people make this argument, but I think it was different back then. All of those things are either based off of some kind of ancient, naturally occurring entity, or some kind of mass-produced machine. I can believe that they evolved or were created as some kind of AI that went wrong. Muck is the odd man out, but his design is simple, and it's not a huge stretch of the imagination to say that he's some kind of mutated monster created by pollution. No amount of suspension of disbelief can get me to believe a fucking Dairy Queen ice cream cone is an animal. Same with a trash bag (Jesus...), or a sarcophagus (how many of those could there possibly be?). A sand castle is in that realm of ridiculousness too. It just doesn't seem like something that would come out of nature, and none of them are meant to be man-made, so they all seem ridiculous. So does that candelabra one. People say it's a ghost that possesses the candelabra, but what ghost? Ghastly? And does it only possess that specific style of candelabra. What if all of those were melted down? Before you could at least say "this is an animal or a machine," but now I don't really think you can.

kblkbl165 · 16 points · Posted at 12:29:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It wasn't. It's just your sense of nostalgia. Also that the old game sprites look more raging than the anime ever did.

_gamadaya_ · 2 points · Posted at 12:55:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm not a Pokemon fan, so there is no nostalgia going on.

Or, you know, just downvote me despite the fact that I actually had a concrete argument and little to no reason to be attached to one gen over another.

kblkbl165 · 0 points · Posted at 15:45:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rationalizing isn't an argument, is a mechanism of self defense. We're talking about something one hundred percent subjective.

You didn't write a single argument, they were opinions(check the difference). If sand castles and ice cream cones are where you draw the line, that's you. There's nothing factual about giving your opinion.

As someone said before in this thread, ghosts possessing things and pretty much ghosts in general a HUGE thing in Japanese culture, you know, the culture of the creators and for whom they catter towards. You like dragons and raging eyes, they like ghost-possessed objects and bubbly eyes. They're the creators and the main audience.

People say it's a ghost that possesses the candelabra, but what ghost? Ghastly?

Why would it be a pokemon? Are all plants, pokemons? Why would all ghosts be pokemons? Better, why would all ghosts be ghost-type pokemons? Pokemon ghosts are a thing, as in the Lavender town, was the Marowak mom in fact a ghastly? Or did this event completely crush your suspension of disbelief on the series and you stopped right there?

Reinhart3 · 2 points · Posted at 21:24:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Before you could at least say "this is an animal or a machine," but now I don't really think you can.

Yes, 5 eggs are an animal.

CobraCommanderVII · 4 points · Posted at 14:01:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or the seal that was called "Seel".

Greenbird60 · 3 points · Posted at 13:00:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the mime/clown, and whatever the hell Jinx is supposed to be (other than racist).

norcaljosh · 1 points · Posted at 14:00:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey the pokeball got larger AND turned upside down!

Tagrineth · 1 points · Posted at 14:52:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

dont forget the sea horse named horse sea.

[deleted] · 75 points · Posted at 10:46:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

rupesmanuva · 4 points · Posted at 15:37:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And mimikyu is fucking awesome.

thesolarknight · 2 points · Posted at 14:35:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Like the lantern pokemon. It purposely goes over to sick and dying people to steal their souls when they die.

SidewaysInfinity · 3 points · Posted at 20:04:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Burning souls as energy kind of ties into the old "will o' wisp" legends too. Chandelure's such a cool Pokemon.

[deleted] · 204 points · Posted at 10:39:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If the gens came out in opposite order, you could completely reverse the argument and have it work just as well. Because every gen has its share of Pokemon based on inanimate objects. And I think that is actually more creative than taking a generic animal (prime example: pigeon), slapping cutesy eyes on it and calling it a day.

crizthakidd · 107 points · Posted at 10:54:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah you'd be like what the fuck? A pokeball Pokémon? Really?

[deleted] · 61 points · Posted at 11:06:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

superiority · 13 points · Posted at 11:19:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like these dudes are fresher observing, I have the sensation the old characters and new characters are connected or approximately like that.

UncheckedException · 6 points · Posted at 12:17:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hmmm yes, I concur. sucks bubbles into pipe

TheOneTonWanton · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're supposed to blow the bubbles out of the pipe...

Maconheiro1 · 5 points · Posted at 11:20:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tree-trunk legs are essential for punting Donphans

Narissis · 3 points · Posted at 14:45:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Though 'chicken legs' aren't really gonna prevent the other guy from getting to Mahogany Town. Marathon runners aren't exactly known for their stockiness.

mupetmower · 1 points · Posted at 12:21:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As much as I hate these bots, this was the first time I thoroughly enjoyed one of the pictures.

DrLiamSeuss · 13 points · Posted at 11:13:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One of the themes tried out in gen 1 were man made mons. Koffing and Slimer representing polution, Magnemite and Voltorb representing mechanical contraptions, Mewtwo and Porygon representing the world's technological advances.

The idea never became too prevalent, and the origins of Pokémon in general got revamped a couple of times.

Whippofunk · 73 points · Posted at 10:58:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tangela, a pile of blue vines? With red shoes. Wtf is koffing even? Voltorb/electrode... lickitung creepy af. Most evos are just cramming 3 pokes together doduo/dodrio magnemite/magneton diglett/dugtrio. These are the things people would be crying about for gen 1 if it came out today.

TheComingOfTheGeeks · 13 points · Posted at 11:18:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But.. but... my childhood...

LtLabcoat · 20 points · Posted at 11:08:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seel is literally a cartoon seal with a horn. Called 'seal'.

And don't even get me started on Bulbasaur or Charmander, who despite being really popular Pokémon, have the most simplest of designs.

Doctective · 43 points · Posted at 11:30:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Simple isn't necessarily bad.

LtLabcoat · -7 points · Posted at 11:38:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not bad when there's a reason for it to be simple. Like with Ditto, or Mew. But it is bad when you're trying to design a fantasy monster based on a seal.

Blackultra · 5 points · Posted at 12:41:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, that's kindof the point.

f3nd3r · 3 points · Posted at 12:37:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol, you should have said Squirtle if anything. He's literally just a walking turtle.

LtLabcoat · -1 points · Posted at 12:53:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm going to admit my bias and say that Squirtle at least had a slight bit of design thought in it, while Bulbasaur and Charmander are the textbook definitions of "generic cutesy monsters".

f3nd3r · 2 points · Posted at 16:27:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean that's what they were going for. Bulbasaur has a plant growing out of its back, Charmander has a burning tail, but Squirtle doesn't have anything.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:28:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's why Gen 1 is so good. Simple designs based on animals.

Sure you could bring up wack Pokemon like Voltorb or Magnetite but that's not what people are talking about when they say Gen 1 is better. There are shitty designs in every gen. But overall + the high points of gen 1 outmatch everyone else.

theLoveGiant · 1 points · Posted at 22:18:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That can be proven even remotely.

LtLabcoat · 13 points · Posted at 11:26:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a culture thing, really. Japanese folklore has a lot of monsters that are inanimate objects turned to life, so the idea of sentient eggs/magnets/keys/gears isn't out of the ordinary for them. But in western folklore, the only non-animal monsters/possessions are plants, dolls, suits of armour, swords, books, and that one piano in SM64. So those 'lazy ideas' like ice cream cones and sandcastles seem way out of touch - while stuff like Bellsprout and Aegislash don't even get the slightest complaint.

thesolarknight · 2 points · Posted at 14:40:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, Japan even has a very specific word for classifying inanimate objects that have come to life. I believe it's "Tsukumogami"

SutekhThrowingSuckIt · 1 points · Posted at 13:10:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

that one piano in SM64

...a Japanese game.

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 10:54:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 10:58:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nothing, and for that reason I don't like it.

Its design is still more stylized than Pidgey's though, because Pidgey is just a pigeon, nothing more or less. Its gen 1 sprite even looks like a regular, generic bird.

I'm not good at chess, but I'm pretty sure that's not a checkmate.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 12:49:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm pretty sure that's not a checkmate.

It's not.

cvntiness · 2 points · Posted at 11:27:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a take on Odette's costume. Head feathers as the head piece. Blue chest as the bodice.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:49:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How is this statement checkmate at all?

Swanna had a cool design, I guess. There was nothing unique about it though.

fullforce098 · 1 points · Posted at 11:17:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, though, Gen 5 did have a literal bag of trash Pokémon that evolved into a bigger bag of trash. Not only is that kind of uninspired, it's fucking trash, who the hell wants to play with a litteral trash Pokémon? I get that it was supposed to evoke New York City but come on, a fucking TRASH Pokémon??

Even removing nostalgia, that's by far the worst idea for a Pokémon in the series. Doesn't disprove your point, though.

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 11:27:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Trubbish and Garbodor are pretty terrible, but only as bad as Grimer and Muk are. A blob of sludge is about as disgusting as a trash bag.

daveboy2000 · 1 points · Posted at 11:59:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But at least a blob of sludge isn't something you literally see every single day in real life.

kblkbl165 · 2 points · Posted at 12:31:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Like a pidgeyon? Lmao

mysticrudnin · 3 points · Posted at 12:30:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i think trubbish is cute and i like to use garbodor

trubbish was absolutely in my casual team when i first played white

Mechawreckah4 · -5 points · Posted at 11:20:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well no shit. The thing is they didnt. Ome out in opposite order. Thats like saying "if the order of eating and shitting were reversed, youd think shitting made you eat"

Ditario · -25 points · Posted at 10:50:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, going from Sandcastles and Donkeys with 1980s bangs to Normal Pigeons and Caterpillars is definitely the same.........

salatkopf · 15 points · Posted at 10:53:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And a pokeball with eyes and, wait for it, a pokeball with eyes and reversed colours!

[deleted] · 24 points · Posted at 10:53:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, going from three magnets stuck together, Pokeballs with eyes, eggs that evolve into a coconut tree, two blobs or sludge, mud sausages that evolve into three mud sausages and mimes to owls, cats, donkeys, toucans and lions is definitely the same.........

Eddard__Snark · 8 points · Posted at 10:59:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Diglett will always be a mud sausage to me now. Thank you for that.

Ditario · -4 points · Posted at 11:40:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You could list a million different reasons to compare gen 1 + 2 to the rest but you instantly lose trying to compare ANY of those dumb examples (even 3 mud sausages) to a

Sand Castle

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 11:43:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not even a sand castle. It's a ghost.

Pokedex entries:

Sun: Possessed people controlled by this Pokémon transformed its sand mound into a castle. As it evolved, its power to curse grew ever stronger.

Moon: Buried beneath the castle are masses of dried-up bones from those whose vitality it has drained.

And yes, that's a cooler concept than any of the ones I listed.

Ditario · -2 points · Posted at 11:48:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a ghost.

right.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:49:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Try actually reading the Pokedex entries, or maybe even the fact that it's a freaking ghost type?

imakevoicesformycats · 41 points · Posted at 10:38:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They've always been pretty silly.

Zer0DotFive · 71 points · Posted at 10:39:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Right? Exeggcute is literally 5 eggs. Lol

jmerridew124 · 33 points · Posted at 10:46:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seeds*

RexLongbone · 51 points · Posted at 10:53:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A seed is just a plant egg

Scrofl · 18 points · Posted at 11:19:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude

kevinxdang · 4 points · Posted at 11:34:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Whoa

Ditario · 12 points · Posted at 10:52:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Friend reading over my phone, "holy shit, mind...blown"

KenpachiRama-Sama · 6 points · Posted at 12:08:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You have dumb friends.

whomad1215 · 0 points · Posted at 12:37:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The word "egg" is literally part of the name

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 10:51:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

jmerridew124 · 4 points · Posted at 11:00:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Specifically Fire Red and Leaf Green.

FireRed: Even though it appears to be eggs of some sort, it was discovered to be a life-form more like plant seeds.

Leaf Green: It is often mistaken for eggs. When disturbed, they quickly gather and attack in swarms.

EDIT: Also,

Pokemon Stadium: A Pokémon that is like the seeds of a plant. If you find one and chase it, others will join it without you noticing

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 11:02:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

jmerridew124 · 1 points · Posted at 11:07:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What brought on that edit if you don't mind me asking?

geardedandbearded · 2 points · Posted at 11:27:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I previously assumed that they included the "exeggcute is seeds" in later versions of the pokedex (such as fire red and leaf green) but in the original red and blue I believe the entries are word for word the same as the leaf green, which you posted

Rikplaysbass · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What, what now?

jmerridew124 · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
EvagriaTheDamaged · 1 points · Posted at 10:55:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And voltorb is a pokeball with eyes. Electrode is voltorb, flipped, with a mouth.

IsyaBoyFromWalgreens · 11 points · Posted at 10:45:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Awww. I actually really like Palossand. Bred a 5 iv Bold one that was female and named it BarbraStreisand. Or some modification of it to fit the character count

DrLiamSeuss · 5 points · Posted at 11:02:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the ice cream cone and keyring!

lIlllIlIlIl · 5 points · Posted at 11:22:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

JINGLE JINGLE MOTHERFUCKERS!

DrLiamSeuss · 2 points · Posted at 12:02:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

BRAIN FREEZE!

lIlllIlIlIl · 1 points · Posted at 00:00:39 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

WANNA KILL SOME DRAGON TYPES?

Hairless-Sasquatch · 3 points · Posted at 11:06:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

don't forget the ice cream and garbage bags

Eevea · 3 points · Posted at 12:11:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh god. You have no idea the number of people you've just triggered. RIP your inbox

chelsea-vong · 1 points · Posted at 16:17:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You weren't kidding, lol

theLoveGiant · 3 points · Posted at 22:15:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are running out of ideas for pokemon. It seemed like 10% of the pokemon in the old games looked stupid. Now is like 10% look good and the other 90% look really stupid.

1grammarmistake · 40 points · Posted at 10:37:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was just gonna say - as someone who hasn't paid ANY attention to Pokemon since the days of Mew and MewTwo, I honestly thought the sandcastle pic above was a joke...

Infiking385 · 70 points · Posted at 10:42:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They've been doing this from Gen 1. Voltorb is literally a pokeball with eyes while Electrode is an upside down pokeball with eyes and a mouth.

ArtofAngels · 5 points · Posted at 10:54:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't there a pokemon that looks like an icecream that evolves into larger servings?

I don't know the name but I sure as hell remember seeing something worse than a sandcastle.

mysticrudnin · 3 points · Posted at 12:31:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i think in the pokemon universe, ice cream is modeled after the way it looks

MyNameCouldBeFrank · 2 points · Posted at 10:58:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Vanillish, vanilluxe? I can't remember exactly but yeah, it goes from a tiny ice cream to a regular ice cream, to a double serving one. It's from Gen 5, but they've been doing stuff like this the whole time

kblkbl165 · 3 points · Posted at 12:41:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, like a magnet into a triple magnet. Or a mud sausage into a triple mud sausage.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:14:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

kblkbl165 · 1 points · Posted at 15:47:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A living magnet is a better concept than a ghost-possesed ice entity in the form of an Ice Cream. But I bet you didn't even know the lore of the thing, did you?

Ghost-possessed objects are where you draw the line, but actual LIVING objects are ok? lmao

papaya255 · 3 points · Posted at 11:15:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

fuck you, vanillish is badass

from the gen 7 pokedex:

"This Pokémon has existed since the Ice Age. It controls particles of ice, freezes its opponents, and then shatters them with a headbutt."

it just fucking obliterates people by freezing them what can your pansy little dragon do?

gulmari · 6 points · Posted at 13:42:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's an ice cream cone...

No bullshit description can make some soft serve more badass than a dragon.

sean_sucks · 2 points · Posted at 11:11:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Vanilluxe, and he's bad ass.

sword4raven · 9 points · Posted at 11:02:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not really about realism only though, there is just something especially lame about a living sandcastle.

Fantasy isn't about realism, after all, it's about making something that fits. In turn, whatever is made is going to determine the mood or atmosphere in the story. Thus the rule of cool and rule of fun.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleOfCool

Something can be absurd, but the absurdity has to fit the story. Otherwise, it makes the story or world itself unpalatable. This is also why we have people getting annoyed when there are guns in fantasy. Some people will really like guns and think they are awesome. While for others they destroy the whole feel they really liked within the story.

So basically some people want Pokemon to not only be for kids, but living sandcastles don't fit into that.

Skyy-High · 14 points · Posted at 11:33:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude, the only reason you think koffing is cool and sandygast (the sand castle pokemon) isn't is because you grew up with one and you just heard about the other.

Serbaayuu · 10 points · Posted at 11:10:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but living sandcastles don't fit into that

They lurk on public beaches and trap Pokemon and people in sand vortexes, devouring their body for nourishment. The soul is left behind and as a resentful spirit, becomes a new Sandygast (lowest-form evolution of that Pokemon).

sword4raven · 0 points · Posted at 11:42:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Of course, but that won't change people initial reaction to them. Some people would also go for things like

Sandcastle dying and becoming a ghost = silly. This might ruin their immersion. You can put a rock in front of a person and explain how it is a horrible monster. Some people will buy it, some people won't. But mostly what matters is what context it is presented in. If you walk up to a random person on a normal day and tell them a rock is scary, they'll find you weird. If you take some of your friends out on an exploration of an abandoned site, even if they don't believe it, they might still be stirred and scared slightly if you spin it as a local story.

Firstly many people grew up with Pokemon, making it easier for the first generation.

Secondly, a lot of people will try to distance themselves from Pokemon as they don't think it is very socially acceptable to use too much time on what is essentially a show for children. Being embarrassed they'll at times try to find some outliers to attack to feel better about themselves.

Thirdly it'll be a lot harder for people to follow the idea that a sandcastle is supposed to be scary if all they see is a cutesy story. Where a sufficiently powerful mood is never created. Creating a disconnection between said so-called scary story, and what they experience.

While the sandcastle monster might be fine, it will face some resistance. Also, the truth of the matter is it would really depend on a lot of factors whether you feel it is a good addition or not. And whether it really is, depends on who the audience is, will be or could have been. It's really simplistic to judge a whole out of a few of its parts.

trippy_grape · 3 points · Posted at 13:42:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Firstly many people grew up with Pokemon, making it easier for the first generation.

This may shock you, but there are still people growing up with the newer generations.

Secondly, a lot of people will try to distance themselves from Pokemon as they don't think it is very socially acceptable to use too much time on what is essentially a show for children.

Did you forget about Pokemon Go? Pokemon has almost always been at least a little bit cool to the general public; the only time it is viewed negatively imo is when people take the card game seriously.

kblkbl165 · 3 points · Posted at 12:38:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not really about realism only though, there is just something especially lame about a living sandcastle.

What isn't lame about a pile of sludge?

So basically some people want Pokemon to not only be for kids, but living sandcastles don't fit into that.

These people are COMPLETELY retarded. The pokemon game series is already complex enough in its PvP to attract non-kids. These people want their childhood memory to grow with them. There's no reason for it to happen. The first gens were completely cattered to kids. While you and me were playing pokemon, older people were playing Castlevania or Metroid.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:46:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean, it wasn't like everyone was playing Pokémon instead of castlevania and Metroid as kids. My first real game that I played all the way through was Demon's Souls, followed by a Castlevania game (symphony of the night, I think) that was available as a PSX>PS3 game. Pokémon is one of the easiest-to-beat game franchises out there, but some people enjoy it regardless.

kblkbl165 · 1 points · Posted at 15:51:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed. What I meant is that the main audience of pokemon is kids. It was in their release and it is now. Demon's Souls doesn't make changes to catter to a younger audience because it'd damage their perception with their main audience.

Why would Pokemon implement any core change in the design of the game/artwork to appeal to people who aren't their target? They already do much more than any niche game I can recall of by having some mind boggling intricate stat system for PvP.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:58:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The IVs and whatever have been there since forever, but they've steadily becoming less and less meaningful. The same is true for Fire Emblem, stat growths are much higher.

I have no problem with Pokémon being kid-centric - I actually support it, as it gets a lot of people into strategy game. However, and this is true for both series, I really want to see a more "adult" game... darker to a degree, but much more serious, more tactical, less forgiving, and a lot more open-world. Zelda's Breath of the Wild is something similar to what I'm talking about.

thesolarknight · 2 points · Posted at 15:02:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I always saw the whole sandcastle thing as a way to make the Pokémon more inconspicuous, like some form of camouflage.

If we look at the Pokémon world, the parents of that world are fairly irresponsible. So, what better form to attract young children, in a beach location while mom/dad look away for a second? It's primary form of killing people seems to be sucking them into a sandpit (like quicksand but faster) which would be another means of losing sight of a person while keeping a low profile (see Pallosand killing Pikachu).

hottoast16 · 0 points · Posted at 11:22:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree with your comment but I don't think the new pokemon look out of place.

Also, I like the new eyes better than the old ones. Old eyes all look the same but the new eyes have different shapes and colors. I grew up playing pokemon and they all have a place in my heart.

Also, obligatory Mega-Altaria best mon. SO MAGESTIC! :P

[deleted] · -3 points · Posted at 10:46:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

Ansoni · 5 points · Posted at 10:50:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Then you've got a magnet, slime, a bunch of rocks.

Seriously guys leave my sandcastle pokemon alone.

Dray_Gunn · 3 points · Posted at 10:53:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cant forget purple rat.

Ansoni · 1 points · Posted at 11:18:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or like the 7 pokemon that are just humans.

MobiusF117 · 1 points · Posted at 12:13:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or bird

JarlaxleForPresident · 3 points · Posted at 10:58:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

An evil sandcastle pokemon is basically a venus kid trap

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 10:49:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

...no it doesn't. Unless you believe the "Voltorb is a Pokeball possessed by a Haunter" theory.

Palossand actually makes sense because it's an actual ghost.

FlippantFox · 2 points · Posted at 11:03:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also Seel. Which is literally just a seal.

Technical_Machine_22 · -15 points · Posted at 10:47:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Let's talk about how fucking racist Jynx is, while we're at it.


Edit: all right, so not racist. Easily misconstrued as racist, but really a sexy demon-ghost from Japanese folklore. My bad.

[deleted] · 15 points · Posted at 10:49:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jynx was never supposed to be a stereotype of black people. It's actually most likely based on a weird Asian fashion trend.

Galaher · 2 points · Posted at 10:54:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had no idea that Jinx is racist.

Technical_Machine_22 · 2 points · Posted at 10:51:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I believe it was Ganguro (sp?) but I mean, come on.. Nobody at GameFreak caught that before release?

My Mr Popo cosplay isn't blackface either, but it sure as hell looks like it.

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 10:56:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just because something looks like it might be racist, it doesn't automatically mean it's racist. If it was Gamefreak's intention to make fun of/insult black people, then it would be racist.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 10:52:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

Technical_Machine_22 · 3 points · Posted at 10:54:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was more thinking about the atrocious mess of makeup, but you're right.

Reinhart3 · -2 points · Posted at 10:50:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

since the days of Mew and MewTwo,

The good old days of Gen 1 back when we had a magnet that evolved into three magnets, or the pile of eggs.

I find it hard to complain about a pokemon made of sand when Gen 1 had pokemon that is a literal pile of eggs.

imadandylion · 6 points · Posted at 11:12:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

one of the gen 1 pokemon is literally just a pokeball. another is just a seahorse.

like someone else said, if they were released the other way around, people would be saying the same thing. for some reason, people can't admit that some of the older pokemon are also a bit shit.

that being said, i still love the seahorse and the pokeball, just as much as i love the set of keys, the sandcastle and the donkey.

xmashamm · 2 points · Posted at 13:42:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They lost me at icecream cone pokemon.

They started with "based on an animal or something from mythology" and went to "lets do cute things!!!!!!!!!"

2paymentsof19_95 · 5 points · Posted at 12:00:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You think that's bad, Klefki is literally just a set of keys.

Ditoeight · 4 points · Posted at 14:22:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Klefki is actually a fairy that collects keys

2paymentsof19_95 · 1 points · Posted at 22:09:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But even without the added keys, he still looks like a key and keyhole

MrReconElite · 5 points · Posted at 11:11:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well that was my complaint versus Digimon because Digimon were data and not wildlife they ould get away with dumb designs and stupid names. In Pokemon I was a little less forgiving to the designs because of it.

TheLiquidStorm · 3 points · Posted at 10:46:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sandcastle is pretty cool imo. Its a haunted sandcastle, cute and scary at the same time

JohhnyDamage · 1 points · Posted at 11:03:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love gen 1 but we legit had pile of pollution, magnets, and pink slime.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:38:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think they ran out of ideas, the artist just stopped thinking a solid color is okay. I think the shift to noisey designs is most apparent with the legendaries and happens every generation of pokemon. Look at Reshrem, all one color but they're too afraid to let the color just happen.

The pokemon didn't get sillier the art just got worse. At least in my opinion it got worse. I'd argue that overall the Pokemon from the later gens are a lot cooler and well developed, it's just the art design that doesn't do it for me.

Faustias · 1 points · Posted at 11:44:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

it's a ghost-type, and there are many of these especially Rotom who is basically an electric ghost that possesses appliances.

ATownStomp · 1 points · Posted at 18:30:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At least that's creative. The first one is literally just a donkey.

Like, woah, check out my pokemans.

DumbWhore4 · 1 points · Posted at 20:07:00 on October 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sandygast and Palossand are your examples of them running out of ideas? Really? Both of those pokemons designs are amazing, and better than anything in gen 1.

Mr_Karosu · 0 points · Posted at 10:58:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Magnemite was a fucking magnet. Just let that sink in. Thank you.

Pheniwhat · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the ice cream cone -.-

The second I saw that I died a little inside. http://orig12.deviantart.net/cd43/f/2012/172/4/b/vanillite_by_roky320-d54bzl9.png

likeabosstroll · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They've always had not very good ideas. Voltorb is literally a living poke ball. Some designs in every generation are good and some are bad. It's hard to come up with 10p% original and good looking designs everything.

codymariesmith · 0 points · Posted at 10:46:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

as opposed to literal eggs, literal pokeballs, and literal cacoons.

seriouslees · -1 points · Posted at 10:57:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That first one is just a fucking donkey.

"Bro, you gonna catch that Pokemon over there?"

"That's a donkey."

"Cool, imma go catch it."

papaya255 · 5 points · Posted at 11:20:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

yeah but wait until you see what it turns into

it genuinely weighs over a ton, making it heavier than every other non-legendary (and most legendary) pokemon

biggmclargehuge · 8 points · Posted at 11:14:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ponyta was a horse. Seel was a seal. Spearow was a sparrow. Take off your rose-tinted glasses

einstyle · -1 points · Posted at 11:01:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I actually think gen 3 is the creative nadir of the series. From 5 on is pretty lackluster too, but 3 is just awful. At least in the other generations you can accurately guess a Pokemon's type by looking at its design.

hottoast16 · 2 points · Posted at 11:51:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree that gen 3 had designs that were confusing not being able to tell what type a pokemon is but gen 3 also had some of the best and most original designs.

Take for example Altaria.

While you probably can't tell that it's a dragon, a pokemon that is a bird with cotton wings is very creative and it's design is excellent.

kblkbl165 · 1 points · Posted at 12:43:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That may be true in a gameplay sense, but aesthetically gen3 is awesome

morrigan52 · -1 points · Posted at 11:44:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

geodude is a rock with arms

kblkbl165 · -1 points · Posted at 12:25:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's how I know you barely remember anything about the first gen. Cuz back then every pokemon was as cool as Charizard, right? lol

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 12:43:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well in Gen 1, we had a lot of stupid Pokemon designs. Such as these

Collegenoob · -1 points · Posted at 14:13:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean really a magnet? I mean really a pile of sludge? I mean really snake spelled backwards? I mean really a ball?

It goes both ways.

theLoveGiant · 2 points · Posted at 22:12:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree they havent ever look as good as 1st and 2nd gen. Too many of them just look really really stupid now. The games are still fun but the pokemon design have suffered.

alex494 · 1 points · Posted at 11:26:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right, not enough spheres with bits sticking out.

AzureSkye · 1 points · Posted at 11:40:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, it looks like they changed them because these style eyes look super aggressive. :-/

anotherfan123 · 1 points · Posted at 13:59:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I believe that was when Ken Sugimori's style got less prominent.

hawkeye315 · 1 points · Posted at 14:00:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think there was a HUGE difference between gen 3 and gen 4. The art style changes drastically in my opinion between the two. Just look at basic Pokemon. Zigzagoon vs bidoof.

nuzzlefutzzz · 280 points · Posted at 10:21:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Basically Gen I Pokémon are super pissed. I'm gonna guess this has something to do with the war we don't know about (see Lt. Surge). Now everything is peaceful so all the Pokémon are much happier! No more need for angry eyes. Unless you're like a dragon or something.

TimbuFTZB · 168 points · Posted at 10:23:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

wouldn't they still be pissed though since they're basically gladiators

PhalanxLord · 116 points · Posted at 10:35:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If I recall pokemon love to battle. Why else would a trainer constantly be getting attacked?

dakotathehuman · 29 points · Posted at 11:29:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Go run into the jungle and ask yourself if that panther or group of giant golbats is attacking you because they love to battle, or because they're hungry lol

[deleted] · 35 points · Posted at 11:44:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

ishkariot · 6 points · Posted at 16:00:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lore that was conveniently written by humans.

"Oh, don't worry! Our slaves really enjoy being slaves and working without pay, it's in their nature!"

Just sayin'

dakotathehuman · 6 points · Posted at 12:31:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah I'm just fucking with ya guy

Dameleon · 1 points · Posted at 17:04:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lore doesn't lie

PhalanxLord · 2 points · Posted at 18:10:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When humans in the pokemon world are definitely the alpha predator I don't see golbats attacking them for food. Sun and Moon had a little girl carrying around a pokemon that weighed a metric ton like it were nothing. A golbat has nothing on that.

On a slightly more serious note (at least so much as a discussion about pokemon can be serious) one of the manga did have a pokemon abandon its trainer for not letting it battle. Not every pokemon loves to fight but there is plenty of evidence that a love of battle isn't an uncommon trait.

Rocky87109 · 5 points · Posted at 11:38:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ahh yes, the perfect propaganda. /s

Pollomonteros · 2 points · Posted at 15:04:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Come to think of it, the cavemen of the Pokémon world must have been supermen of sorts, to be able to domesticate those walking weapons without getting annihilated in the process.

PhalanxLord · 1 points · Posted at 17:59:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Considering how heavy some of the pokemon you see trainers lugging around in their arms are I think they are still crazy strong. One of the characters in Sun and Moon carries around a pokemon in her arms that weighs 2204.4lbs and she's just a little girl. One of the professors learns about pokemon by having them use their attacks on him (and not just weak ones). The humans of the pokemon world are much scarier than practically any of the pokemon. There is a reason why they are in charge.

KenBoCole · 2 points · Posted at 11:30:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe because the pokemon are hungry?

[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 11:44:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

ForgotPasswordNewAcc · 10 points · Posted at 12:05:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lore is written by the winners.

GateauBaker · 15 points · Posted at 11:57:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"We're not oppressing them! They love to battle!" - Pokemon League

FauxPastel · 16 points · Posted at 12:30:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wake up, mareeple!

fletchindr · 1 points · Posted at 14:37:02 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

chicken fights is wrong, they're not natural born predators like dogs

fletchindr · 1 points · Posted at 14:35:07 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

to save their pokemon brothers from slavery and bloodsport

throwtowardaccount · 30 points · Posted at 10:52:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But champions get put out to stud with Dittos. Small price to pay.

ClassySavage · 1 points · Posted at 15:20:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do you really want to fuck the girl of your dreams only to watch her melt into an amorphous pink blob when you're done?

throwtowardaccount · 1 points · Posted at 23:02:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Im not saying yes but Im not saying no either. You don't know me.

oxilite · 1 points · Posted at 11:36:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That would be a real PSBattle, Photoshopping cocks (the bird) into an episode to highlight that interesting double standard.

zeion · 1 points · Posted at 11:02:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

gen 1s have seen some shit

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:48:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We need a game covering the pokemon wars man, the original demographic group for pokemon is now well over their 20s and most are still loving it. It could be what breath of the wild is to the zelda franchise if it's done right.

jumykn · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The dot is actually a sticker. His name is L T Surge.

Mnstrzero00 · 1 points · Posted at 18:48:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or it could be that early gen pokemon are set in asian regions...?

KevIntensity · 1 points · Posted at 21:13:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like this fan theory about Pokémon GO and the war that still hasn't been fleshed out.

JackDragon · 4 points · Posted at 10:54:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old eyes make the new pokemon look like... jackasses.

I mean, look at that glare.

SihvMan · 1 points · Posted at 12:53:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Boo! Hiss!

...have an upvote.

Kotee_ivanovich · 5 points · Posted at 11:51:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Actually the new Pokemon look not that good with the old eyes

Drayzen · 5 points · Posted at 12:08:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No it doesn't.

This is a kids game and it makes them look very angry and mean.

Most of the people here are adults and they are trying to change a kids game.

extradiegetic · 9 points · Posted at 10:31:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

they look ok but saying they're better is a stretch

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 10:40:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

youre wrong

immapupper · -1 points · Posted at 10:46:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

youre not right

s1ravarice · 3 points · Posted at 10:37:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now I want to see some gen 1 pokemon with new eyes to see how fucked up it looks.

Realtrain · 1 points · Posted at 10:37:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
AvatarIII · -1 points · Posted at 10:47:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mudbray looks retarded with "New eyes" but actually looks pretty cool with "old eyes"

materfuze · 0 points · Posted at 11:09:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Definitely these are at least 90% more Pokémon

rW0HgFyxoJhYka · 0 points · Posted at 11:13:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"childrens card game"

vs

"toned down childrens card game"

awfeel · 182 points · Posted at 10:27:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Original

Redone


Also, I would probably have used Pikachu's eyes for Popplio or even Eevee's. You lost a lot of Popplio's innocence which doesn't correlate well.

Have to think of things from a design perspective (I used Spearow's eyes for Trumbeak here for example since they are both pretty agitated looking birds.)

MikeManGuy · 11 points · Posted at 11:19:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree. The one you did here is the only one in this thread that looks appropriate (or even good)

N0V0w3ls · 5 points · Posted at 16:19:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I was just thinking that not all the Gen 1 eyes looked like the angry eyes. Pikachu, Squirtle, Eevee, etc. all had rounded eyes like Oricorio does.

stephangb · 658 points · Posted at 10:01:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There is a fucking sand castle pokemon?

Cypherex · 173 points · Posted at 10:24:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If it makes it any better it's a haunted sand castle, so it's a ghost type.

I mean, if an inanimate object has to be a Pokemon it at least makes sense for it to be a ghost Pokemon, what with how ghosts possess inanimate objects. Hence why the Rotom forms are perfectly fine. Normally a Lawn Mower, Oven, Fan, Washing Machine, and fucking Refrigerator would be horrible designs for a Pokemon. But it works for Rotom because the appliance isn't the Pokemon, the Pokemon is just possessing the appliance.

So in this case he's possessing a... well a pile of sand to make a haunted sandcastle. It still sounds stupid but maybe not... as stupid?

Wolfntee · 66 points · Posted at 11:36:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fairies are the only other type where an object makes sense. I think in older folklore fairies used to mimic inanimate objects.

Ex: Klefki

monopolowa1 · 7 points · Posted at 12:35:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

mimic

Now I really hope they make a chest pokemon/the Luggage

DontPromoteIgnorance · 3 points · Posted at 13:18:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That last word really changed where this comment went.

SidewaysInfinity · 3 points · Posted at 20:08:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A "mimic" clam always seemed like a logical choice for Pokemon. Instead of pearls it has other precious stones or gold.

becomearobot · 2 points · Posted at 13:46:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In western on Japanese folklore?

Wolfntee · 4 points · Posted at 14:14:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was able to find something in Japanese lore about Yokai mimicking inanimate objects.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yōkai

RQK1996 · 4 points · Posted at 14:33:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

both

SurpriseWtf · 3 points · Posted at 12:09:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Klefki

Keyringamon, right?

OrangeBinturong · 5 points · Posted at 12:14:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep! Key-shaped fairy that steals people's keys.

Namagem · 8 points · Posted at 14:14:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Literally a trickster sprite based on an old wive's take explaining how people lost their keys. It's based on a European fairy myth, because it's a European-themed region. (Gen 6 is based on France, if you didn't know.)

OrangeBinturong · 7 points · Posted at 14:44:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep! Klefki's actually one of my favorites, haha. Plus its name is a triple portmanteau. The English word for key, the French word for key, and a corruption of the word kleptomania. A key that steals keys. It's a perfect name.

Nomicakes · 6 points · Posted at 14:23:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I couldn't tell from the massive Eiffel power tower.

Namagem · 7 points · Posted at 14:46:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Eh, not everyone in this thread has played the new games, so I wanted to specify.

Emmental_elemental · 2 points · Posted at 12:23:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The only thing about Klefki that I can't get over is it's little nutsack. Just bugs me.

Ridry · 3 points · Posted at 13:10:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never noticed that before and now I can't unsee it. WHY!?!!

patricksand · 2 points · Posted at 12:06:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought pokemon existed before humans, which always seemed weird since some of them incorporate human made objects etc.

wisdom_and_frivolity · 4 points · Posted at 12:18:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The whole point of pokemon is that they evolve so I'm pretty sure adapting to new environments is kinda their thing.

MEOWTH_FUCKER · 3 points · Posted at 12:36:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not all of them. Some are man-made like the Porygon line and some of others have evolved recently.

Roflcawptur · 2 points · Posted at 12:15:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rotom = motor backwards

PMmeyourfunbits · 1 points · Posted at 16:53:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the pokedex! Anyone else annoyed that you can't use your pokedex to fight?

Ryuuten · 1 points · Posted at 20:03:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This kind of thing is actually based on a concept in Japanese folklore, about inanimate objects. I found an entry about that category here, if anyone is interested:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsukumogami

You can see this in other anime, too, and lots of old stories. :)

Swiftierest · 20 points · Posted at 10:25:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah his lore is actually pretty nasty. He basically sucks in and eats anything that gets close enough and it really should just be read rather than explained

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Palossand_(Pokémon)

WilhelmScreams · 10 points · Posted at 12:07:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Buried beneath the castle are masses of dried-up bones from those whose vitality it has drained.

oh shit

AllSeeingAI · 4 points · Posted at 03:25:58 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

"In his belly, you will find a new definition of pain and suffering, as you are slowly digested over a thousand years."

-C3P0

BadProse · 213 points · Posted at 10:11:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. Cool idea, too bad he could get kicked over by a toddler just like irl. He sucks

edit: Okay, I get it kicks don't work on him bc he's a ghost type and his lore says he eats toddlers. Practically the only thing he eats is ass though

CanuckPanda · 480 points · Posted at 10:23:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He's ghost type, so normal and fighting type moves don't affect him (eg. Jump Kick or High Jump Kick).

Also he eats children's souls, and being a sandcastle is a way to lure them to their death.

Pokedex entry;

Buried beneath the castle are masses of dried-up bones from those whose vitality it has drained.

[deleted] · 240 points · Posted at 10:28:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh so like a van that says free candy

KapteeniJ · 84 points · Posted at 10:34:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd want to see that Pokemon.

unnamed03 · 68 points · Posted at 10:41:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait for the next generation.

muphdaddy · 10 points · Posted at 10:46:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When you do, he'll turn you into bones

drvondoctor · 3 points · Posted at 11:03:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So... he'll bone you?

Khalbrae · 5 points · Posted at 11:30:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I want off this wild ride!

right_in_two · 2 points · Posted at 11:26:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh you mean Vanlure? Already designed for the next gen.

KapteeniJ · 2 points · Posted at 13:09:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Team rocket using Vanlure near a school could get dark so fast

Lolleos · 2 points · Posted at 13:15:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rapenz. Pokedex entry: The unintimidating ice cream van image is actually a way to lure younglings into its trap.

Elranzer · 1 points · Posted at 14:01:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
JustCallMeBigPapa · 1 points · Posted at 15:17:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just trying to get into that boys soul

wtfblue · 13 points · Posted at 10:30:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So one of the least badass looking Pokemon is actually one of the most badass. Interesting.

H4xolotl · 61 points · Posted at 10:28:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

wtf I thought pokemon was a children's game

jgodin03 · 246 points · Posted at 10:35:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Drifloon's Pokédex entry:

Stories go that it grabs the hands of small children and drags them away to the afterlife. It dislikes heavy children.

The games are full of this stuff.

H4xolotl · 70 points · Posted at 10:38:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is Drifloon /r/fatpeoplehate's least favourite Pokemon?

thijser2 · 132 points · Posted at 10:42:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He is actually one of their moderators.

ensignlee · 7 points · Posted at 13:12:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Should be their most favorite, no?

ScatStallion · 11 points · Posted at 11:17:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Inb4 cubone/marrowak link

CanuckPanda · 76 points · Posted at 10:33:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sun/Moon has some fucking metal Pokedex entries.

Zer0DotFive · 63 points · Posted at 10:42:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My favorite is Salazzle keeping a harem of male Salandit lol

CanuckPanda · 30 points · Posted at 11:17:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That moment when you wonder why your Salandit hasn't evolved at level 48 and you finally notice it's a male.

Damn it, at least you're my RP Pikachu chilling on my shoulder bro now.

Captain_Kuhl · 7 points · Posted at 11:30:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wish they did evolve. Keep em small, sure, but the fact that they don't evolve at all was a bit of a turn-off from wanting to level mine.

Ridry · 2 points · Posted at 13:12:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's like Combee.

Captain_Kuhl · 1 points · Posted at 21:15:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, but I feel the same about Combee.

Meecht · 1 points · Posted at 12:33:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only something like 12% of Salandit are female.

shinyjolteon1 · 2 points · Posted at 13:00:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As someone who is breeding for a shiny semi-competitive Salazzle, never tell me the odds

Dragmire800 · 2 points · Posted at 13:40:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Why is that lol? Lots of animals keep harems. Lions, for one, are well known for keeping large harems

Zantre · 2 points · Posted at 11:07:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It could have a harem of male anything, really.

Rohaq · 7 points · Posted at 11:38:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
CanuckPanda · 3 points · Posted at 11:39:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Rohaq · 6 points · Posted at 11:41:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ingenious_name · 1 points · Posted at 09:09:58 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)
walrusman64 · 2 points · Posted at 14:25:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Primeape is so angry that it dies

Halfreide · 35 points · Posted at 11:39:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gengar's entry in Sun.

Should you feel yourself attacked by a sudden chill, it is evidence of an approaching Gengar. There is no escaping it. Give up.

Froslass has a creepy one

When it finds humans or Pokémon it likes, it freezes them and takes them to its chilly den, where they become decorations.

Or how about Mega Glalie?

The excess energy from Mega Evolution spilled over from its mouth, breaking its jaw. It spews endless blizzards.

Pokemon Moon's entry for Bewear is pretty scary

This Pokémon has the habit of hugging its companions. Many Trainers have left this world after their spines were squashed by its hug.

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · 5 points · Posted at 13:36:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love the phrasing "many trainers have left this world." Reminds me of the Ocean dub of Dragon Ball Z: "Time to send you to the next dimension."

RQK1996 · 2 points · Posted at 14:35:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When it finds humans or Pokémon it likes, it freezes them and takes them to its chilly den, where they become decorations.

they don't even get killed

Ludovikk · 29 points · Posted at 10:36:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It is but it was always kind of dark, gengar and drowzee who eat dreams, slowpoke who gets his tail cut for weird medecine and cubone who wear his mother's skull.

tsilver33 · 53 points · Posted at 10:35:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nah, Pokemons been like this since the first gen. Cubone wears its dead mothers skull on its head.

phoenixrawr · 47 points · Posted at 11:13:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Which sun and moon also gave a small nod to funnily enough. The fan theory used to go that Cubones were baby Kangaskhans whose mothers had died, and in SuMo Cubone can call Kangaskhan during an SOS battle.

tsilver33 · 16 points · Posted at 11:43:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha thats awesome. I've always subscribed to that theory myself. The sprites for the roo and cubone are nearly identical.

Dash12345678 · 2 points · Posted at 12:31:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But why does this Kangaskhan come after the orphan? Is it trying to steal the orphans' fortune?

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · -1 points · Posted at 13:31:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I completely accept this theory. Because if you think about it, if Marowak evolves into Kangaskhan, that means that it came to peace with its mothers death by becoming a mother itself, replacing its sorrow over its mother with love for its baby. And when that Kangaskhan dies, the cycle will continue once more.

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:36:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

honestly many of the early ones were fairly bland, Hoenn was when they started to get good

[deleted] · 63 points · Posted at 10:35:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A game about putting animals inside poke balls and sending them into storage to pretty much never be opened again. The few powerful enough to deserve your attention are then repeatedly battled to the point of unconsciousness for the rest of their lives.

It's a pretty dark game if you remove the rose veneer and ask too many questions, it's better to just suspend it into happy colours and goal oriented gameplay.

LtLabcoat · 20 points · Posted at 11:13:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's at least a distinction based on gameplay mechanics, and two of the gens at least try to make it seem like they're not just stuck in the PC but actually in a vacation-y part of the world. The Pokédex entries are intentionally dark.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 11:18:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In the TV shows you had entire fields of that bison pokemon after that idiot Ash caught hundreds for some reason. I try to imagine it's all going well like that and corporate bureaucracy hasn't caused massive chains of pokemon abuse centers in the later games.

Besides, these worries are all nothing more than theories. Game Theories.

MathWiz86 · 10 points · Posted at 11:38:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm likely recalling incorrectly, but I think he wanted to catch one certain Pokemon, but Tauros kept running into the Pokeball's path over and over, resulting in him catching 30 Tauros.

That episode is banned outside of Japan due to firearm usage, so all of a sudden Ash had 30 Tauros with no explanation.

Dinkir9 · 3 points · Posted at 12:06:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Okay I understand the Porygon episode, but... are they just hoping kids will go their whole life without ever seeing a firearm?

MathWiz86 · 4 points · Posted at 13:12:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Media for children was famously sensitive in this time, so a lot of shows from Japan were changed due to "cultural differences," in this case, a firearm being pointed at a 10 year old boy.

Some cultural changes are stupider though, such as the infamous onigiri to sandwiches. EDIT: Oni, not ori

Ridry · 2 points · Posted at 13:14:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

American children can suspend disbelief long enough to imagine a monster shoved in a ball but rice balls are too hard to imagine?

MathWiz86 · 2 points · Posted at 13:32:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Like I said, stupid. Sometimes it worked, others it didn't. Sometimes they were called jelly donuts, which was more believable to kid me since there was clearly some filling.

MathWiz86 · 2 points · Posted at 13:33:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One of my favorites of this is in Digimon Adventure 02, where Mimi is offered onigiri, and in the dub says, "Are those...sandwiches?! I haven't had sandwiches since I went to America!" or something along those lines. EDIT: Oni not ori

Ridry · 1 points · Posted at 13:34:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

LOL! I misunderstood and thought you meant the edited the episode? They just straight up called the oni-giri sandwiches?

MathWiz86 · 1 points · Posted at 13:36:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yup. Likely because it would be difficult to redraw those animations, as opposed to quickly scrubbing over kanji and writing in English on a background element.

NightofTheLivingZed · 2 points · Posted at 13:14:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's tons of poke-slavery going on. Pikachu with lifeless eyes running on hamster wheels to power emergency generators at the pokecenter in episode 2.

whomad1215 · 4 points · Posted at 12:39:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They have poke pelago with sun and moon so they're not in pokeballs for their entire life.

darkrider400 · 0 points · Posted at 11:41:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, the whole basis of the game is basically beating the shit out of magical creatures and making them our slaves. Then we make the slaves fight until one in unconscious and can no longer fight. Like, the entire basis of the game is fucked, but that didnt stop me from playing it, lol

Sergeant-sergei · 5 points · Posted at 10:36:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon had creepy dex entries since 1st games were released.

swimmydude · 2 points · Posted at 11:49:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol, a lot of nursery rhymes and popular children stories actually have very dark origins/meanings.

TabMuncher2015 · 4 points · Posted at 12:24:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Bewear: Many Trainers have left this world after their spines were squashed by its hug.

Somehow I don't think the dex is as subtly dark as nursery rhymes. More in-your-face with the whole broken spine thing...

swimmydude · 1 points · Posted at 14:15:22 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's true, Pokemon isn't really been subtle about it. I was giving an example of the first thing that came to mind and I'm sure it's anecdote enough to get the point across for someone who seems to not know much about the games.

adventureismycousin · 1 points · Posted at 12:18:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Check out Hypno's backstory. Creepy thing.

Witzche · 1 points · Posted at 12:25:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That was your first mistake.

Jiggatortoise- · 1 points · Posted at 16:56:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only on the surface.

Zediac · 13 points · Posted at 10:57:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When I was a kid I was under the impression that quick sand was going to be a big hazard in my life. It seems like I was slightly off. It was more of a quick sand castle that I needed to fear..

LiefKatano · 4 points · Posted at 12:23:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't worry, man, Sandygast only has 15 base speed. Not quick at all.

MountainDewde · 5 points · Posted at 12:43:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't feel too bad for them, they were sandcastle kickers.

Rabbi_Rustko · 3 points · Posted at 11:17:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuxking dark

Dinkir9 · 1 points · Posted at 12:03:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's pretty brutal coming from a children's game.

I love it.

R3belZebra · -3 points · Posted at 10:29:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hes a sand castle, and a ghost....

What the fuck. This is why I can't play pokemon anymore

CanuckPanda · 13 points · Posted at 10:31:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because dual types didn't exist before?

The horror of a Ghost/Ground type! What's next, a Ghost/Poison (Haunter, Gengar), or a Water/Ghost (Jellicent)!

Bruh. Ghost/Ground isn't even unique, that's also Golurk who's based on the Jewish Golem.

R3belZebra · -5 points · Posted at 10:46:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah i think that there was a ghost with jewels for eyes in GS or RS that was ghost rock/ground, im not unaware of dual types, it just doesn't make any fucking sense and feels completely phoned in. Like there was a meeting where they made up pokemon and everyone has been there for days and is frustrated and just wants to go home, and someone goes "IDK A FUCKING SANDCASTLE GHOST THAT EATS KIDS FUCK IT" and the head dude just throws his hands up and says "fuck it, call it castledorf"

CanuckPanda · 12 points · Posted at 10:48:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sableye is a Dark/Ghost type.

And come on man. In the first generation they were like "let's put some eyes on a bunch of eggs!! Well call it... Eggsecute!"

Shit's been cheesy as fuck since day one.

R3belZebra · -5 points · Posted at 10:57:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It made more sense though. Those were monsters, not just things. No one questioned the validity of an egg pokemon back then. Hell, we all spent hours in the safari zone fucking throwing rocks at Chancey praying to god that fucker didn't run away. I get it that you grew up with it, but there's a reason why the newer gen pokemon are being called into question. Its just phoned in.

CanuckPanda · 8 points · Posted at 11:01:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How are eggs monsters? You have such insane rose-tinted glasses it's not worth having this discussion with you.

Google it. People made just as much fun of fucking eggs then as you are now making fun of a sandcastle. People questioned design choices just as much, you just don't have the resources thus far to make accurate comparisons.

None of it is phoned in. Or all of it is.

I played Blue and Red when they originally came out. There was just as much dumb shit then as now.

R3belZebra · 2 points · Posted at 11:07:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Explain how a sand castle or garbage bag is more of a monster than eggs and slime. A sand castle.

StarOriole · 4 points · Posted at 11:14:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a haunted sand castle. A ghost that's possessed sand and moves it around until it can find small children to lure inside and eat. It probably smothers them to death with the sand after they crawl inside to play.

I'd say that Eggsecute being psychic makes sense -- because how else could it see, when its eyes aren't yet developed? -- except it also has eyes. If it were just telepathic, telekinetic eggs, you could say that it was the baby Pokémon inside that were bludgeoning you to death... but no, the eggshells themselves are watching you and eating you with actual eyes and actual mouths.

I don't actually mind Eggsecute or anything, but I don't think it's less half-assed than a murderous sand castle.

Jiratoo · 8 points · Posted at 11:14:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are magnets better monsters than a Sandcastle? Is a literal seal a good monster? Is a coconut tree that evolves from eggs a good monster?

Pokemon always had cheesy stuff. I dislike the sandcastle (or the ice-cream thing and similar pokemon) too, but gen 1 had stupid pokemons too. Dunno why you're so insisting that it didn't.. It's hard to not see this as a nostalgia thing.

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 11:21:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Im not saying that they didn't have goofy crap in gen one, just that a sand castle, garbage bag, and ice cream cone are more ridiculous than an egg or magnetics

Jiratoo · 4 points · Posted at 11:26:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dunno, I think electric magnets are exactly as stupid as a Ghost Sandcastle, angry Vanilla Ice cream or eggs that attack in swarms.

R3belZebra · -1 points · Posted at 11:29:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe. It just feels phoned in. I loved pokemon as a kid. There had to be a radical change to make me think it was ridiculous after a certain point, or I would still love it like I do countless things, including the Old Gens. I diddnt just grow up, something changed, something that few can put into words, but its definately different.

TabMuncher2015 · 5 points · Posted at 12:28:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I loved pokemon as a kid. There had to be a radical change to make me think it was ridiculous after a certain point, or I would still love it

Nostalgia goggles. I still play Gen 1/2 and their remakes, but I can't get into the newer ones. It's not the game's fault though.

CanuckPanda · 3 points · Posted at 13:11:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You grew up.

I don't enjoy playing on the floor for 18 hours with stuffed animals anymore. Does that mean something about the stuffed animals changed, or did I just get older and develop new tastes and preferences?

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 14:24:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, i grew up and my tastes changed, to where I only like old gen pokemon but not new gen pokemon, the pokemon people say are just as bad/good as the old.

Zapdos678 · 3 points · Posted at 17:27:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's LITERALLY nostalgia.

R3belZebra · 1 points · Posted at 22:36:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I grew up with pokemon. So what you are saying is, I grew up with it, played each one as they came out, one came out that was clearly different and I didn't like, STOPPED playing it, and never played anything past that certain point, and THAT'S nostalgia. Because I have the definition of nostalgia here if i need to cover this with you

CanuckPanda · 5 points · Posted at 11:11:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did you miss the part where the sand castle is alive, has a mouth, and eats children?

If I told that story to my four year old niece, I think it's safe to say she'd call it a monster and be pretty fucking wary of sand castles next time we're at the beach.

Just because you're a jaded old ass doesn't mean that things aren't monsters.

mon·ster ˈmänstər/ noun noun: monster; plural noun: monsters 1. an imaginary creature that is typically large, ugly, and frightening.

That seems to satisfy the definition of frightening, no?

Sergeant-sergei · 3 points · Posted at 10:36:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He eats toddler pokemon. Read his dex entries. Pallosand is name.

Atmosck · 2 points · Posted at 12:55:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude, he eats toddlers.

Mazo · 100 points · Posted at 10:23:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also an ice cream cone, a keyring and a pile of trash

silverdevilboy · 339 points · Posted at 10:40:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey, don't forget 'pile of slime', 'big pile of slime' 'pink pile of slime', 'some eggs', and a full dozen balls in various colours, with colour, fur and stubby limbs the only difference.

Gen1 had stupid shit too. It's part of Pokémon that some of the Pokémon just look really fucking weird, and it has been since the very start.

Reinhart3 · 86 points · Posted at 10:51:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget magnet that turns into 3 magnets.

bobsizzlack · 57 points · Posted at 11:47:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

and then it turns back into 1 magnet.

Nitro_Indigo · 8 points · Posted at 13:14:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Actually, the three Magnemites fuse together when Magneton evolves into Magnezone.

Have you seen Truegreen7's video on the worst Pokémon designs? He said he was fine with Magneton because magnets stick together, but not Dugtrio because (whack-a) moles don't.

bobsizzlack · 5 points · Posted at 14:10:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

can't say I have, but whack-a-moles being pack animals makes little sense I guess.

Panory · 3 points · Posted at 16:21:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pack animals are fine, but that doesn't make them one organism.

Mathgeek007 · 138 points · Posted at 10:50:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the pile of vines, a goldfish, another goldfish, a pigeon, a rock with arms, a line of rocks, and a shallot.

regularabsentee · 122 points · Posted at 12:18:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

People always forget Gen 1 had literally just a crab named Krabby.

glglglglgl · 104 points · Posted at 12:36:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And a seal called Seel.

power_of_friendship · 49 points · Posted at 12:43:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My favorite is always going to be the snake called ekans and the cobra called arbo[k].

I guess now they could call it Kens though.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 13:47:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And slime called muK!

power_of_friendship · 2 points · Posted at 13:47:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

ayyy

Techguy10110 · 1 points · Posted at 17:22:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

k.. u.. m.

IS THIS A CHILDRENS GAME OR WHAT?

Rumpel1408 · 1 points · Posted at 14:18:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait a minute if you read that backwards... oh my god and they would have got away with it to

CaptainJackKevorkian · 5 points · Posted at 17:48:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

don't forget the seahorse cleverly named Horsea

Tagrineth · 3 points · Posted at 15:03:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

which evolves into a dugong called Dewgong

DLN-000 · 23 points · Posted at 12:45:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At least english gave it anything. In japanese its just crab like the real life animal. And dont forget it gave us Thunder and Thunders as pokemon (Zapdos and Jolteon).

Neander7hal · 9 points · Posted at 13:02:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or a cat just named Persian. Not Purrsian which would've been slightly clever. Persian.

Mentalpatient87 · 9 points · Posted at 13:14:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And it's not even a persian cat!

AvatarIII · 27 points · Posted at 10:49:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

some eggs

don't forget, those eggs evolve into a Coconut tree/Pineapple.

Typedinletters · 25 points · Posted at 11:09:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well those eggs are not eggs... they are seeds

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Exeggcute_(Pokémon)#Biology

"Despite looking like eggs, Exeggcute is actually more closely related to plant seeds."

Jiratoo · 9 points · Posted at 11:18:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sure, lorewise they are seeds. Doesn't change the fact that it obviously was inspired by eggs (see: name and how they look)

Otherwise the sandcastle thing is actually a Ghost Venus-like Trap that kills kids and not actually a Sandcastle.

Edit: Redditsync shows this comment as controversial; is there really something controversial about Exeggcute being inspired by eggs? Did I miss something?

AvatarIII · 5 points · Posted at 11:26:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

that kills kids

eep

Typedinletters · 4 points · Posted at 11:55:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are not inspired by eggs, they are inspired by dracaena seeds, hence Why the evolutions of it looks like two types of dracaena trees.

Jiratoo · 12 points · Posted at 12:00:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A) they look like eggs (I mean some 'em are shown as cracked and you can see the yolk) and I have never talked to a person that looks at Exeggcute and does not immediately think of "eggs".

B) they literally have "egg" in their name. Like, a huge amount of Pokemon have their real life influences in their name.

So let's at least change it from "inspired" to, at the very least, "influenced", although I would still argue that the egg similarities are obviously intended.

Lucifer_Crowe · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And now a Dragon.

Dracarna · 2 points · Posted at 11:29:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I personly think muk and gimmer have a place becuase slimes are rather comon creatures in fantasy and i would guess what ever pokemon is classed as.

Flashyshooter · 2 points · Posted at 19:07:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I honestly like some of the simple ones especially as a child. People are way too critical. They've just become cynics now because they're adults.

I guarantee there's a simple Pokémon concept for every one that people commonly name.

ZaFormicFish · 3 points · Posted at 11:41:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A ring of keys though?

PurpleLego · 2 points · Posted at 11:26:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's the different art styles that make them look more authentic and can be taken more seriously though

Dash12345678 · 1 points · Posted at 12:36:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait what was that after Exeggcute?

silverdevilboy · 4 points · Posted at 13:42:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Voltorb, jigglypuff, electrode, venonat, oddish, mankey, geodude, graveler, golem, poliwhirl, poliwag, gastly, koffing, tangela. All are decorated spheres.

And that's being kind and ignoring things like clefairy and chansey as not being spherical, just round-bodied, and magnemite because the magnets are almost as big as the sphere.

You could end one of the original series shows just by naming all the near-spherical pokemon in the original 150. "Who's that Pokémon" is unanswerable if they show you a circle.

Rendonsmug · 3 points · Posted at 16:04:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"Who's that Pokémon" is unanswerable if they show you a circle.

Jigglypuff seen from above!

OhGarraty · 2 points · Posted at 20:40:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokeball, pink ball, upside-down pokeball, purple fuzzy bug-eye ball, black ball with leaves, taupe fuzzy ball, grey ball, larger grey ball, larger grey ball with snout, blue swirly ball, larger swirly ball, gassy ball, smelly ball, wriggly ball.

Metal ball with magnets. Three metal balls with magnets. Egg-shaped ball with egg.

Also six or seven small balls with different faces, two and a half smelly balls, large taupe fuzzy ball, black ball with bud on top, black ball with flower on top, and ball inside a purple spiky shell.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 12:55:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

silverdevilboy · 8 points · Posted at 13:54:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Upside-down pokeball.

At least the keyring tries to justify it by being possessed. Goofy explanation of how people always lose their keys.

Upside down pokeball has no justification. It's the size of a human. What, is it special camouflage to hide in pokemart for sale displays next to the giant novelty pokeball sign?

One is goofy and amusing even if it looks a bit stupid, one is just dumb and nonsensical.

fuqdeep · 7 points · Posted at 14:28:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At least the keyring tries to justify it by being possessed. Goofy explanation of how people always lose their keys.

Which is actually based on real world myths of fairies.

saladvtenno · 3 points · Posted at 16:42:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rock with arms...

WaxyPadlockJazz · 1 points · Posted at 10:51:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One was a magnet

lizardclaw11 · -1 points · Posted at 10:47:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also all 3 Pokémon he listed are really well designed tbh :/

GlyphGryph · 0 points · Posted at 14:40:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

None of those are as stupid as a key ring though. (The pile of trash is, imo, perfectly fine, the ice cream cone is borderline and maybe a bit worse than the 'some eggs' but not by much, but that fuckin' key ring is the stupidest thing)

silverdevilboy · 5 points · Posted at 14:44:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

See one of my other responses. Upside-down giant pokeball beats possessed keyring for dumb ideas.

GlyphGryph · 1 points · Posted at 15:07:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nah, the upside-down pokeball had not one but two fun gimmicks. It was a joke, but an intentional one that worked pretty well (it looked like an item pickup! Also, it's actually a bomb!)

I mean it was still kind of dumb as a pokemon, but as the one off joke it was intended to be it was fine.

silverdevilboy · 3 points · Posted at 15:33:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That explains pokeball as a pokemon. It doesn't come close to explaining the evolution into an upside down one the size of your character.

GlyphGryph · 1 points · Posted at 16:05:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Evolutions are generally "like thing but even moreso" so I mean, it kinda does?

[deleted] · -11 points · Posted at 10:57:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

th3xile · 14 points · Posted at 11:12:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean like the magnet made of a metal orb with a screw in it? Or how about the pokeball pokemon? Every generation has a couple Pokémon based off of inanimate objects. If gen 1 came out today people would be calling magnemite and voltorb stupid, especially since magnaton just becomes three magnemite stuck together and electrode is just upside down.

[deleted] · -5 points · Posted at 12:42:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

th3xile · 8 points · Posted at 12:44:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes but if you look at the later generations you only get a small handful of non natural objects as Pokémon too. The numbers have stayed in a general proportion throughout all the games. I wasn't trying to say your statement was false, rather that it didn't make gen 1 different than the other generations.

Edit: also in your comment you said "now" they can be any object. Which falsely implied that it wasn't the case back in gen 1, which is also what I was making my point about.

Lexifox · 5 points · Posted at 11:11:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're called Pocket MONSTERS, not Animals.

Captain_Kuhl · 8 points · Posted at 11:32:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grimer/Muk is literally toxic waste. No different than Trubbish/Garbador. You can't pull that "at least they looked like animals" bullshit, because most new gen pokémon still do, but people love to jerk themselves off over a few cherrypicked examples. And they don't use lube.

indigo121 · 5 points · Posted at 11:28:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 had the mime Pokémon and the blackface Pokémon.

Captain_Kuhl · 7 points · Posted at 11:34:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean you don't have a colonies of mimes and late-19th-century-theatre-actors living in the woods near your house?

silverdevilboy · 0 points · Posted at 11:10:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Refer to list above. None are animals, all are dumb, all are gen1.

ldn142 · -8 points · Posted at 11:51:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's got much worse. The after gen 2 they ran out of ideas and now they look stupid.

Chucklay · 69 points · Posted at 10:45:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

and a pile of trash

meirl

rmphys · 3 points · Posted at 14:10:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

thought it was gonna be a picture of Misty or May with "Your waifu is trash", but I might be spending too much time on /r/anime_irl

DirtyDan257 · 8 points · Posted at 11:02:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think Klefki is ok because the keys aren't actually a part of it. Klefki is a kleptomaniac fairy that's a prankster and steals people's keys and collects them. When it faints in game its arms open and drops the keys to the floor.

MetallicWop · 17 points · Posted at 10:37:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't you dare disrespect Klefki

Zantre · 6 points · Posted at 11:09:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No one on the corner has swagger like us...

EvagriaTheDamaged · 3 points · Posted at 10:59:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Klefki and Vanillish are adorable, and garbodor is a better muk!

madchad90 · 1 points · Posted at 11:54:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What if in their world the ice cream Pokemon came first and they just based ice cream cones off of it?

saladvtenno · 3 points · Posted at 16:47:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's how it seems to be since they mentioned it has appeared since the "ancient ice ages" in the snowy mountains. And there's an ice-cream like food ingame that's looks like the pokemon.

eternalexodus · 1 points · Posted at 23:35:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

holy shit

immapupper · 0 points · Posted at 11:00:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow

cBlackout · -9 points · Posted at 10:42:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea this is definitely my biggest issue with new Pokémon. I can deal with different eyes and styles but why the fuck would a key ring Pokémon exist and why would I want it to

Zapdos678 · 5 points · Posted at 10:47:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because a pile of eggs, a lump of slime aren't as ridiculous? Please, if gen 7 and gen 1 had swapped pokedexes everyone would be complaining about how boring and unimaginative they were. Only reason why you don't treat gen 1 Pokemon that way is nostalgia

cBlackout · 0 points · Posted at 14:10:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the pile of eggs is stupid itself, and magneton will never make sense. It's not nostalgia, I just don't like the concept of a key ring being a Pokémon.

But fuck me for having an opinion right?

Zapdos678 · 6 points · Posted at 15:41:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In that case, there wasn't any reason for you to throw in "new", since every generation of Pokemon has stupid designs. All that does is imply that you believe gen 1 is only gen and other genwunner BS.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:47:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because they wanted to make it exist.

Just like they wanted to make Voltorb and Electrode, Magnemite and Magneton, Exeggcute and Exeggutor, Jynx, Mr. Mime, Grimer and Muk etc. The new designs are actually pretty tame compared to the amount of stupidity in gen 1.

codymariesmith · 7 points · Posted at 10:52:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grindr

heh.

bobloblawdds · 3 points · Posted at 12:22:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Autocorrect Freudian slip!

Shog64 · 80 points · Posted at 10:13:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Sand Castle Pokemon is actually pretty cool

GlyphGryph · 2 points · Posted at 14:41:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Concept is kinda cool, the actual design is a bit lackluster imo

Vismungcg · -13 points · Posted at 10:18:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did you forget your sarcasm tag?

Vilokthoria · 67 points · Posted at 10:21:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The idea is that it's a ghost Pokémon that looks like a sandcastle to lure in unsuspecting victims. Sure, not the coolest Pokémon, but the idea is pretty solid.

MEOWTH_FUCKER · 9 points · Posted at 12:47:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its shiny is pretty neat too. Not only does the black color suit a Ghost Type a bit more but it's a nice throwback to the black sand beaches of Hawaii.

wonkey_monkey · 20 points · Posted at 10:26:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The idea is that it's a ghost Pokémon

the idea is pretty solid

Naaaah.

WelshJoesus · 7 points · Posted at 10:29:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yaaaah.

Shog64 · 3 points · Posted at 10:41:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean it is like the spooky cousin of Muk. I always liked Muk, so I concure I like Palossand

MrAmazingApple · 47 points · Posted at 10:22:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And his name is pile of sand (palossand)

imakevoicesformycats · 47 points · Posted at 10:39:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Palace Sand

Reinhart3 · 97 points · Posted at 10:51:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So fucking lazy. Can we just go back to the good old days with our Snake pokemon whos name is just "Snake" backwards?

Throwaway----Account · 33 points · Posted at 11:37:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or that Muk Pokémon that's made out of...sludge

Slouchynut · 2 points · Posted at 12:53:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You don't think they spelled other names backwards, do you. I mean I might be way out in left field by myself chasing butterflies but you know, pipes, "sludge," life form, teenage boys! Oh my!

RQK1996 · -1 points · Posted at 14:38:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Muck: noun, dirt, rubbish, or waste matter

source: a dictionary

GuitarRunner · 5 points · Posted at 11:46:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right, Eltsacdnas is way cooler

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 12:24:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · 8 points · Posted at 13:39:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sudowoodo is a great name. Pseudo-wood, fake tree.

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 14:30:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · 1 points · Posted at 15:33:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha. I like it because when I played gold/silver as a kid I of course had no idea what pseudo meant, so I didn't make the "Sudo" connection. So upon adulthood with my highly refined vocabulary I was able to look back and get it. IThere are a lot of cases like that with Pokemon... I've heard of some people discovering years later the method behind "Ekans" or "Arbok." I feel like there's always at least one Pokemon name that flew over each fan's head for years.

regularabsentee · 3 points · Posted at 12:19:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Krabby. Seel.

metalflygon08 · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sandcastle

Eltsacdnas

WasabiPics · 1 points · Posted at 12:34:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And the Cobra whose name is cobra backwards too. And lets not forget the incredibly clever Seel.

Auctoritate · 2 points · Posted at 11:26:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it might be a reference to palisade.

philipdharris1 · 3 points · Posted at 10:45:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

P.O.S for short then?

IsyaBoyFromWalgreens · 2 points · Posted at 10:47:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Amd here i was thinking it was Palace Sand. Just said a bid odd. Im not too smart lol

DirtyDan257 · 5 points · Posted at 11:05:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it could be a play of words and is possibly meant to sound like both.

Sergeant-sergei · 2 points · Posted at 10:38:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It also sounds like palace. And palo means shovel In french.

CarcajouIS · 3 points · Posted at 10:50:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No it does not

Sergeant-sergei · 6 points · Posted at 10:57:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Spanish. I meant spanish not french. I'm an idiot.

lelarentaka · 1 points · Posted at 11:15:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Explain the city of Palo Alto?

LordWhiskey · 3 points · Posted at 11:50:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you're actually curious, though, that guy confused palo, meaning stick [Palo Alto is named after a kind of Sequoia tree], and pala, meaning shovel.

LordWhiskey · 2 points · Posted at 11:47:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

High shovel

Sergeant-sergei · 1 points · Posted at 14:05:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shovels are well known for taking drugs in spain apparently.

Whatever_It_Takes · 1 points · Posted at 13:14:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought it was pronounced "pail o' sand."

abucci48 · 1 points · Posted at 13:33:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*Pail of sand

MrAmazingApple · 1 points · Posted at 14:11:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No?

Zer0DotFive · 1 points · Posted at 10:43:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pale of sand = Palossand?

brickmaster32000 · 5 points · Posted at 12:21:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean geodude's entire line was just a clump of mud turning into a clump of rock. Onix was just several rocks. A living sandcastle that steals people's souls seems much more creative to me.

HamsterGutz1 · 4 points · Posted at 10:30:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sandcastles in the sand

BenificusAngorio · 4 points · Posted at 11:31:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Um yes. And he's one of the darkest mother fuckers there. Don't listen to these tools talking shit. It's a ghost Pokemon that targets kids and eats their souls or some crazy shit. Just remember, "It" is just a clown...

lurked · 3 points · Posted at 10:22:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There is a fucking trash bag pokemon...

And I wish i was joking.

HebrewLantern · 41 points · Posted at 10:27:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And there's a fucking pile of sludge that evolves into a bigger pile of sludge. Oh wait, since it's gen 1, that makes it okay

Reapist · 10 points · Posted at 10:40:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's okay precisely because it was Gen 1. It was the first. That being said, a pile of sludge is not a foreign idea. Lots of fantasy settings have blobs, goo, cubes, etc. It's not such a strange idea.

THAT being said, since Pokemon IS fantasy/monster style, the reason why many people are against the idea of pokemon that reflect real life objects is because that breaks the idea of fantasy. And in the pokemon universe, it just seems lazy and unoriginal, not to mention, out of place.

That's my thought process.

Lexifox · 6 points · Posted at 11:13:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lots of fantasy settings have objects that are actually creatures in disguise. D&D alone has monsters that mimic floors, walls, ceilings, and even houses.

And really, lazy and unoriginal? "Bag of trash that comes to life" is much more creative than "more dogs and cats".

Reapist · 2 points · Posted at 11:51:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mimic is also a fantasy thing. Not just DnD.

Lexifox · 3 points · Posted at 11:55:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

D&D pretty much popularized the idea that treasure chests could suddenly try to eat you, and this is the concept that most fantasy settings tend to run with, Pokemon included (Voltorb/Foongus lines).

Stuff like the lurker above and piercer are typically ignored in favor of the standard chest mimic.

FlippantFox · -1 points · Posted at 11:07:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So, what's your excuse for the pokemon that was literally just a magnet? Or the pokemon that was literally just a seal with one letter in the name changed?

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 11:53:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

glglglglgl · 6 points · Posted at 12:38:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, two magnets and a metal ball.

Tensuke · 1 points · Posted at 17:57:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If it were a later gen, the magnet Pokemon would literally just be a magnet with eyes.

Zer0DotFive · 2 points · Posted at 10:52:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exeggcute is just fucking eggs with eyes and mouths. Voltorb is an angry ball with eyes who evolves into a smug ball with eyes and a mouth. Not too mention gen 1 and its trios (magneton, dugtrio and dodrio) Looking back, gen 1 probably had the most uninspired designs, probably because they didnt think it would take off like it did

Dyko · 7 points · Posted at 10:35:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't be talking shit about Trubbish. I just got him the other day. He's amazing. You just know that he mouth-breathes heavily, and waddles along behind his friends being all "come on, guys, slow down!"

greenbowser · 1 points · Posted at 11:22:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also keychain Pokemon

sxysteve · 1 points · Posted at 11:28:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thats what I was about to ask.

Chris11246 · 1 points · Posted at 11:31:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How will he ever compete with a pile of slime?

Ncderp · 1 points · Posted at 11:40:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Was wondering about this too...

Fortunate34 · 1 points · Posted at 12:27:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Where you been the past year?

Yodiddlyyo · 1 points · Posted at 13:10:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also an ice cream cone Pokemon!

_mishka_ · -1 points · Posted at 10:20:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When the Ice Cream pokemon was released. That's when I knew I was too old to be playing and had to quit.

[deleted] · 15 points · Posted at 10:24:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm curious how you felt about the Pokemon based on magnets, Pokeballs, sludge, boulders and mimes in the first games. Because it's just as weird if not more.

_mishka_ · -11 points · Posted at 10:28:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It was nothing to do with being 'weird'. It was to do with the fact an Ice Cream pokemon is too childish for my taste.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 10:34:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The whole franchise is designed to appeal to children primarily and there's dozens of Pokemon in every gen that are designed to be childish. Prime examples dating back to gen 1 are the Jigglypuff, Clefairy and Pikachu lines.

As to why it's an ice cream, take a look into the lore. What real life area is Unova based on? (Hint: New York)

Is ice cream popular in America? Yes. In fact many of the designs introduced in each generation are characteristic of the region in real life. Same logic applies to Garbodor in gen 5, Furfrou in gen 6, the Tapu in gen 7 and so many more.

Lexifox · 6 points · Posted at 11:15:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're not even ice creams. They're icicles that have snow on them.

_mishka_ · -5 points · Posted at 12:51:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't really care about the origin of it, it was a lame concept and Pokemon and also very childish that helped put me off the new gen.

Zapdos678 · 3 points · Posted at 17:32:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So, in other words, you grew up, moved on from liking Pokemon but still have fond childhood memories of the old games, leading you to disliking the newer games because they were "childish" and the old games were better.

That's just you looking though rose tinted lenses and being nostalgic.

saladvtenno · 2 points · Posted at 16:51:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rock with arms or sentient eggs with faces are mature and not childish, apparently.

_mishka_ · 0 points · Posted at 23:00:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see I offended a bunch of man children

CanuckPanda · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

DAE Pokemon is for kids!?!!

AvatarIII · 1 points · Posted at 10:48:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also an ice cream cone pokemon.

RyVsWorld · -2 points · Posted at 11:22:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That was my exact thought. These guys are running out of ideas

thedarklord187 · -2 points · Posted at 11:37:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude that the more normal one there's a fucking ice cream cone , keys , and trash one too.

[deleted] · -3 points · Posted at 12:30:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lmao some of the new pokemon are so fucking dumb. like, this one is literally a haunted keychain.

Azrael-XIII · -3 points · Posted at 11:38:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Really scraping the bottom of the barrel now aren't they?

IGELmitDEAGLE · 46 points · Posted at 09:58:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good job, I like it. But could you add a before version, because I don't know any of those new pokemon.

suddenlythevoid · 16 points · Posted at 09:59:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Squint Eastwood!

goo_goo_gajoob · 181 points · Posted at 09:55:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit op was 100% right. These look like pokemon now!

Whatever_It_Takes · 7 points · Posted at 13:19:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So I guess Clefairy and Jigglypuff don't look like Pokemon either, even though they're Gen 1? Same goes for all of the other first generation Pokemon with round eyes. #circlejerk

goo_goo_gajoob · -8 points · Posted at 13:25:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow its almost like art is hugely subjective! #assholeyouare #yoda #I'monredditandstillusehashtags

saladvtenno · 6 points · Posted at 16:53:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"I don't have any argument so I just spout random crap"

Coos-Coos · 11 points · Posted at 09:53:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Interesting. Anyone got mooooaaar?

supershrewdshrew · 4 points · Posted at 10:32:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Unevolved pokemon usually don't get those eyes until they evolve or unless if they were meant to be aggressive. Think of the eyes of Bulbasaur or Squirtle for Popplio, and Ponyta/Slowpoke for Mudbray. The aggressive eyes were just one of many eye-styles, meant for aggressive pokemon. If all of generation 1 had those eyes.... Pikachu, Horsea, Jigglypuff... yikes.

sstout2113 · 3 points · Posted at 10:06:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that a goddamn sandcastle?

Kingca · 3 points · Posted at 10:07:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what that ghost wants you to think.

Gazatron_303 · 3 points · Posted at 11:07:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Since when, in all of ancient Greek Buggery, was there a fucking sandcastle Pokemon?

Mongoosemancer · 3 points · Posted at 11:31:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't played Pokémon in a while, you're telling me there is a fucking sand castle Pokémon lmao..? ugh

kerbalspaceanus · 3 points · Posted at 11:34:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't played Pokémon since red, so what in the living fuck is that sandcastle monstrosity

I_dont-get_the-joke · 3 points · Posted at 11:35:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is one of these pokemon just a sand castle?

ladytwoface · 3 points · Posted at 11:36:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait, was that literally a fucking sandcastle?

lavitat · 3 points · Posted at 11:41:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Why are you putting pokémon eyes on a donkey, seal and sandcastle?

(seriously, did they stop creating things and just copy real world stuff?)

CaptainPigtails · -1 points · Posted at 12:19:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One of the original Pokemon was literally named Seel.

HellaBrainCells · 3 points · Posted at 11:47:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A sand castle? I'm happy I got out of the trainer life when I did.

NMU906 · 3 points · Posted at 11:53:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's a sandcastle Pokémon? Wtf is this world coming to...

I_Have_3_Legs · 3 points · Posted at 11:54:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait, is that a sand castle Pokémon? Wtf even is that? What happens to pokemon? Is this recent

-The_Cereal_Killer- · 3 points · Posted at 11:59:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

WHAT THE FUCK ARE THOSE.

The new pokemon look derpy as shit.

A sandcastle pokemon ffs

artyfoul · 3 points · Posted at 12:01:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL there's a pokemon that's literally a sandcastle... great job on those edits though!

_Spynx_Matrix_ · 3 points · Posted at 12:10:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Was... That a... Sandcastle Pokemon?

/Twitches

skeddles · 3 points · Posted at 12:24:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nope, sand castle still a terrible idea for a Pokemon

Eman5805 · 3 points · Posted at 12:26:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Was that a god damn sandcastle?!

Wow. I'm out of the game. Literally.

humanmanguy · 3 points · Posted at 12:31:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is there actually a sand castle Pokemon, or is that a joke?

SpocksterX · 3 points · Posted at 12:34:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They have a sandcastle-mon now? Lolol

TheMochilla · 3 points · Posted at 12:59:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

is there really a sand castle pokemon?

biggest_guru_in_town · 3 points · Posted at 13:13:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol a sandcastle pokemon? Come on Nintendo! What's next you gonna make a pokemon based off fectal matter?

whatthefunkmaster · 3 points · Posted at 13:15:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Palosand - pail-o-sand.... Really? It must be getting hard to keep coming up with new ideas

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 13:24:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait what, there's a fucking Sandcastle Pokemon the days?

defnotacyborg · 3 points · Posted at 13:47:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I still dont understand what they were thinking when they thought that a sand castle could pass as a pokemon

VisVirtusque · 3 points · Posted at 14:04:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is there seriously a sand castle pokemon now?

futurespacecadet · 3 points · Posted at 14:17:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

that sandcastle is a pokemon? thats dumb as hell

Auctoritate · 7 points · Posted at 10:11:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol, wow. I don't hate new pokemon or anything since I haven't been into pokemon for a while (and I didn't recognize any of these new pokemon) but I've got to admit that the unedited versions of mudbray and palossand look dumb as hell. They actually look really good with the Photoshopped eyes though.

cjbrigol · 4 points · Posted at 10:45:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A sand castle is a pokemon now? That's pathetic

AlextheXVII · 2 points · Posted at 09:55:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

MUDBRAY!!!

Missrollin · 2 points · Posted at 10:03:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can you do new eyes on old Pokémon? Pls make it happen.

hufusa · 2 points · Posted at 10:04:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that a sand castle?

MrMastodon · 3 points · Posted at 10:08:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Whatever it is, it looks high as fuck.

BusofStruggles · 2 points · Posted at 10:05:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey u/trical someone has done this.

Baardhooft · 2 points · Posted at 10:09:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's a sandcastle pokemon now????

Afanadord · 2 points · Posted at 10:37:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mudpray looks like he became a judgemental asshole after your psp change

unix121 · 2 points · Posted at 11:00:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be honest, if the new pokemons looked like that I would probably still be playing the games.

hotniX_ · 2 points · Posted at 11:10:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old Eyes makes the Pokemon look like they will fuck you up.

Rudimon · 2 points · Posted at 11:15:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, it's incredible how much better these are than the original.

Jazzy_Josh · 2 points · Posted at 11:22:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That third one isn't a Pokémon don't lie to me.

DiamondHammer · 2 points · Posted at 13:38:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Honestly, not every Pokemon needs to have the angry eyes. I think Palossand looks fine normally, makes it seem more like some sort of sentient sandcastle.

Flashyshooter · 2 points · Posted at 19:01:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No offense but looks way worse I love the last one though it looks great.

[deleted] · 13 points · Posted at 10:07:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that a sandcastle pokemon? Damn, things have changed since Gen1.

ryphos · 46 points · Posted at 10:17:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You see I always hear that but lets be real... gen 1 has 2 pokemon that are living piles of sewage.

TimbuFTZB · 5 points · Posted at 10:24:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe lore-wise, but really he's just a big slime Pokemon which isn't that strange

Delavonboy12 · 5 points · Posted at 10:36:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And lore-wise the sandcastle eats souls

CptnFabulous420 · 0 points · Posted at 10:32:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And rocks. And miscellaneous bunches of floating metal objects. And Voltorb and Electrode are just spheres with eyes on them. And a lot of them are also fairly regular and not particularly interesting animals. Although that isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's nice that lots of them actually look like they'd survive in the wild.

Ansoni · 1 points · Posted at 10:57:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And lots and lots of people. Say what you want about Gen7 there are no pokemon that are basically just simplified people.

JamesCaesar33 · 28 points · Posted at 10:21:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really. Gen 1 had magnets. And balls.

kazalooloo · 24 points · Posted at 10:25:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And eggs with eyes

JamesCaesar33 · 18 points · Posted at 10:27:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Truth. And rocks with eyes lol

Terencebreurken · 2 points · Posted at 10:58:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dont forget gen 1 also have a plain bull with 3 tails and a horse on fire. And spagetti with eyes and feet.

Rockburgh · 1 points · Posted at 11:07:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, the rocks-with-eyes pokemon at least had arms and/or legs.

Reinhart3 · 5 points · Posted at 10:54:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't get how people can bash the newer gens when shit like exeggcute existed. How would that even work? He's 5 eggs in a little pile. If you tried to pick him up would all 5 eggs be stuck together? Would they die if you pulled them apart?

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 11:05:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

DirtyDan257 · 2 points · Posted at 11:16:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The keys aren't part of Klefki. It's a kleptomaniac fairy who is a prankster that steals keys from people and collects them. When if faints in game its arms come apart and it drops all of the keys to the floor as well.

I guess you could compare it to Hypno or Cubone where the medallion and club are accessories and not the actual Pokemon.

R3belZebra · 3 points · Posted at 10:31:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Call me when Gen 1 has a fucking Jenga Tower Pokemon.

DON'T YOU FUCKING DARE, NINTENDO

Krasinet · 5 points · Posted at 10:30:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 literally had 'a ball that's half red and half white' that evolves into... 'a ball that's half white and half red'.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 10:41:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean Polandball

Fyrestone · 10 points · Posted at 10:25:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 had sludge with eyes that evolved into sludge with angry eyes, a ball that evolves into a palette swap of said ball, and a magnet that evolves into three magnets. Some Pokemon designs have always been ehh.

Supanini · 1 points · Posted at 11:57:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like magneton is cool though, I mean they're magnets so what do you expect. Plus they still change a little bit.

oddfuture445 · 0 points · Posted at 10:14:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, there's a fucking ice cream Pokemon now...

CanuckPanda · 15 points · Posted at 10:25:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now.

Motherfucker that things already nearly a decade old.

oddfuture445 · 7 points · Posted at 10:25:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jesus... Makes me feel so old...

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 10:22:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[removed]

TattoosAreUgly · 5 points · Posted at 10:26:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also a Home appliance Pokémon. It can switchs form, from a microwave to a toaster and some more. I'm not even kidding.

apparaatti · 2 points · Posted at 11:18:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey, I've got an idea! How about a car-pokemon that can transform into a robot? Kids would love it. Maybe call it a transvroom or trucksform or something.

Reinhart3 · 1 points · Posted at 10:52:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How do you go from magnet that evolves into 3 magnets, and pile of eggs to a sandcastle!!!!!

iStorm_exe · 0 points · Posted at 10:32:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

yeah but tbf sandcastle is 100% cooler than "rock with arms"

dotJPGG · 4 points · Posted at 10:07:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

is there actually a sand castle pokemon now

shoe out yet?

Hearbinger · 2 points · Posted at 09:53:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look like they have some genetic syndrome... Perhaps it's better as it is.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 10:12:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:43:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, gen 1 was full of creative mons, like the pile of sludge that evolved into a bigger pile of sludge!

Plz_Pm_Me_Cute_Fish · 2 points · Posted at 10:33:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A fucking sandcastle pokemon? Jesus christ.

Shoryuhadoken · 2 points · Posted at 10:33:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A fucking sandcastle is now a pokemon? Jesus. They're really just looking at objects now and throw eyes on it.

NotoriousPHAT · 2 points · Posted at 10:35:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that really a fucking sandcastle Pokémon? I mean, come on

ShiraCheshire · 1 points · Posted at 09:55:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hahaha, thank you!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:57:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

IKnowUThinkSo · -1 points · Posted at 10:11:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also a keyring, a haunted chandelier and an ice cream cone Pokémon. They ran out of original ideas toward gen 6.

AdamG3691 · 5 points · Posted at 10:20:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's also a keyring

"Jingle jangle motherfucker, I kill dragons" -Klefki

Iralie · 7 points · Posted at 10:15:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My favourite original pokémon is when 1 of something becomes 3 of something.

Brian1zvx · 2 points · Posted at 10:16:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

1 magnet becomes 3 magnets

Zer0DotFive · 2 points · Posted at 10:55:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

1 dick shaped mole becomes 3.

DirtyDan257 · 0 points · Posted at 11:21:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I actually like the idea of a magnet Pokemon being drawn to others like that to evolve but Diglett to Dugtrio just seems lazy.

itrv1 · 2 points · Posted at 11:05:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Magnets getting stuck together? Totally unimaginable. That never fucking happens.

PaperAngel · 3 points · Posted at 10:21:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

hey remember the purple pile of shit? Those were the days man

rupertdeberre · 1 points · Posted at 10:11:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

!remindme 1 day

AvoidMySnipes · 1 points · Posted at 10:14:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It makes them look far more aggressive. Sweet!

Realtrain · 1 points · Posted at 10:28:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We need a subreddit for this!

/r/PokeshopBattles

HyPeRxColoRz · 1 points · Posted at 10:34:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've actually always liked mudbray's blank empty eyes, but you're definitely on to something with popplio and palossand. Makes them look a little more threatening. In general I think somewhere along the line the pokemon became less "monster" and more "cartoon". The old Pokémon had fight in their eyes, now they just have affection for the most part. Sigh.

And let me also just say that Wubat is the biggest disgrace gamefreak has ever created. They took Zubat and made him cupid themed. What the fuck.

ImDead_Promise · 1 points · Posted at 10:52:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, these are actually much better. I love this.

HiddenCity · 1 points · Posted at 11:09:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Woke up and saw the post but this comment wasn't here. Im not even at work yet.... How do you people have all this spare time so early in the morning.

triaspia · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now do new eyes on old mons

raggedcosmos · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love that with the older eyes, the new pokemon all look more suspicious.

karatous1234 · 1 points · Posted at 11:18:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Angry Castle is my favorite. Great job.

alecsharpie · 1 points · Posted at 11:19:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd be very interested to see the new eyes on some of the 1st gen Pokemon! Any chance you could use your photoshop magic, please and thank you sir

EspeonKing · 1 points · Posted at 11:24:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha, that popplio face!

Rocky87109 · 1 points · Posted at 11:37:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That does bring back some of the nostalgia, but I'm not so sure it is the best decision.

jsonaut · 1 points · Posted at 11:41:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Palossand definitely looks better with old-style eyes, dunno about the other two though.

marcuschookt · 1 points · Posted at 11:45:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shit OP was right. The new eyes make it look like Nintendo is trying to PG13 their game which has always been like PG7, which of course makes no sense.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:45:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They've become Asian

AidsFrodo · 1 points · Posted at 11:52:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look so weak now 😔 Bet a Machamp can't even fuck a bumblebee up nowadays

Randomn355 · 1 points · Posted at 11:54:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look PISSED haha

sirmonkey95 · 1 points · Posted at 11:54:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

someone give this man some gold! I would but I'm a poor college student.

Ledoborec · 1 points · Posted at 11:56:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice! They look more dangerous!

Unlimited_Emmo · 1 points · Posted at 11:56:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit that palossand actually looks like the evil motherfucker it is good job

nickoliver86 · 1 points · Posted at 11:57:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is there really a fuckin sandcastle Pokémon haha

jojoga · 1 points · Posted at 12:02:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now, that's some Pokemon if you ask me.

Benny_Andretti · 1 points · Posted at 12:03:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

wow, the eyes are exactly what makes them look different. Good catch OP and nice photoshopping to this guy.

DrunknAzn · 1 points · Posted at 12:56:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Definitely an improvement from what Nintendo gave us!

Prof_Acorn · 1 points · Posted at 13:11:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They actually look like Pokemon with Pokemon eyes. The unedited ones look like Digimon or something. Are you sure they aren't digimon?

jimthewanderer · 1 points · Posted at 13:33:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

mudbray looks like someones about to get murked,

t12totalxyzb00 · 1 points · Posted at 14:00:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

http://i.imgur.com/i58zqgU.png

Still looks like garbage that gamefreak should have scrapped as soon as they saw the concept. It is just fucking ugly. Febas is like milotic compared to that shit.

yamakamakazeCR · 1 points · Posted at 14:59:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

there's a fucking sandcastle pokemon now? jeez these guys fell off so hard after GIII

Inquisitor1 · 1 points · Posted at 15:01:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that a goddamn sandcastle pokemon? Jesus Rice Crispies

Viperspider · 1 points · Posted at 17:47:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's seriously a sandcastle pokemon now?

Haurid · 295 points · Posted at 10:01:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
jalleneff · 262 points · Posted at 10:29:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
lovesickremix · 70 points · Posted at 11:10:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fucking Tammy

Remixman87 · 4 points · Posted at 16:42:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sooo... you don't know of Phoenixperson yet...

lovesickremix · 1 points · Posted at 21:46:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is not birdperson... It's...It's something else...

pandacorn_avenger · 5 points · Posted at 12:05:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

BIRDPERSON NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Gr33ny · 10 points · Posted at 12:10:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*Phoenix Person

whatsername121 · 4 points · Posted at 12:22:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Captainkaspurr · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

BIRDPERSON! NOOOOOOOO!

toilet_guy · 5 points · Posted at 10:49:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like he's planning a night of tomfoolery.

CptnFabulous420 · 4 points · Posted at 10:35:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I suppose it depends on the Pokemon. Stuff like this guy (forgot his name) look fine with cutesy round eyes, but bigger tougher ones should have the 'old' eyes.

co99950 · 2 points · Posted at 11:37:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Even the original had some with the cutesy eyes.

TabMuncher2015 · 1 points · Posted at 12:30:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Chansey

co99950 · 3 points · Posted at 12:41:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

All of the starters had cutesy eyes.

embrex104 · 3 points · Posted at 13:14:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When someone in the car farts and doesn't fess up.

OutOfBootyExperience · 3 points · Posted at 11:24:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"i don't want any damn vegetables"

Crooked_Cricket · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He looks like he's going to sell me Gremlins

hoorahforsnakes · 1 points · Posted at 14:50:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That bird looks stoned

Loftz0r · 0 points · Posted at 10:16:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
R3belZebra · -2 points · Posted at 10:33:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No not that one, still doesn't look like a pokemon

TabMuncher2015 · 3 points · Posted at 12:31:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lol, gtfo of here if you hate pokemon so much man.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 13:46:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The guy is a troll. Look at his history. Don't waste your time.

R3belZebra · -1 points · Posted at 15:24:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol so you call me a shill, creep my comment history to join me on a discussion about pokemon, then call me a troll for voicing my opinion. Yeah, IM the troll

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 15:34:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have you tagged in RES dipshit. I didn't creep your comment history. Learn how to use RES. You think far too highly of yourself.

R3belZebra · -1 points · Posted at 15:37:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No i think appropriately low of you

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 15:46:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, well good thing your opinion means literally nothing to me. Go troll some more scumbag.

R3belZebra · -1 points · Posted at 15:52:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

K keep creepin me looser. Get a fucking girlfriend or something dude godamn who has time for that.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 16:04:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think my current girlfriend would like that. She might get jealous, and I'd rather not throw away 2+ years together. It's funny you think you're so important that people would stalk you. lol

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 22:39:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think my current girlfriend would like that. She might get jealous, and I'd rather not throw away 2+ years together.

Lol /r/thathappened

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, and follows you through multiple conversations AND decides to comment you IN those conversations like a duck.....

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 05:33:33 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's funny how important you think you are.

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 05:42:37 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

And yet here you are, reddit staking me

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 05:48:19 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

You have no clue how the RES tag functon function works do you?

http://imgur.com/a/SDBC2

fuck you're stupid.

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 06:41:38 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, yeah. I forgot how the RES tag also controls your mind and convinces you to continue conversations and arguments on other, completely unrelated threads. Oops!

"It wasn't me that clicked reply, it was RES! It wasn't me that carried my animosity of a suspected shill into a conversation about pokemon, it was the RES!"

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 06:46:29 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just figured they had a right no know what kind of dick you are. Maybe try not treating others shit if you don't want to be treated like it. Oh who are we kidding, you probably thrive off being treated like crap.

The funny thing is I never even mentioned the shill part in this entire thread. You brought it up. Got something you want to get off your chest and confess?

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 08:23:59 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

You sound like such a pansy dude. God Damn, how hard are you stroking yourself to this conversation? Everything you post is hard to read

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:29:00 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're throwing a tantrum because someone said something not nice about you on reddit. Who's the pansy again? Grow some thicker skin.

Everything you post is hard to read

You poor thing, not knowing how to read and all.

R3belZebra · 1 points · Posted at 08:39:32 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:50:53 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 08:51:21 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 08:54:19 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 1 points · Posted at 08:57:24 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:02:04 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 09:52:32 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:01:20 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 10:03:36 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:06:00 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 10:49:56 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:52:23 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 11:06:55 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:46 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 11:19:54 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:27:41 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah I've had my fun with you. This is boring now. Let me know if you feel like having a mental collapse again. Take care!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:24:12 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 16:31:54 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah you're absolutely right. Once he broke though I just wanted to see how far he'd push this. Guess I got my answer.

edit: lol, he's obsessed with me now.

R3belZebra · -1 points · Posted at 00:58:13 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:06:16 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Funny thing is he's now* responding to anything I post with the same thing. The guy has completely lost his mind.

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 00:58:23 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 11:28:04 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shh bby, is ok

R3belZebra · 0 points · Posted at 12:49:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn dude, cry harder why don't you

[deleted] · 1007 points · Posted at 04:53:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

yoloswagbot191 · 211 points · Posted at 07:44:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Comment checks out. Nice sheets.

Ram2145 · 76 points · Posted at 07:49:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks, my mom made them.

[deleted] · 158 points · Posted at 09:38:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[removed]

personosrep_ · 11 points · Posted at 10:01:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the Reddit hug of death got to it.

altmetalkid · 2 points · Posted at 10:54:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think I missed the joke

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the new design looks better

Pm_spare_steam_keys · 1 points · Posted at 10:05:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't available anymore, does anyone have the image elsewhere?

divide_by_hero · 4 points · Posted at 10:09:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
jasslar · -15 points · Posted at 11:22:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, so basically the modern version doesn’t suit your homophobic tastes? I'm so sorry.

I also suddenly like the new pokemon art a whole lot more, thanks ;*

Fisch_guts · 12 points · Posted at 09:30:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait.. you're not op!

Mrdude000 · 14 points · Posted at 09:32:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's op's daughter

Garacious · 2 points · Posted at 09:33:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Op can't type because his arms are broken

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 09:43:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuck.

altmetalkid · 2 points · Posted at 10:57:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For some reason, made me think of that SNL skit where Kenan's character was accused of stabbing someone even though he had two broken arms.

MotherOfTheOP · 1 points · Posted at 10:01:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What, you think I did it?

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 09:49:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks me too

prjktnet · 1 points · Posted at 09:57:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me too, also, as well!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:47:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Uh uh thanks

linkletonsan · 1 points · Posted at 10:43:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me too thanks

ToaKraka · 35 points · Posted at 09:41:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

horde

*hoard

VoltaicCorsair · 41 points · Posted at 09:43:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like to think each individual karma point is a soldier, and that those who've been around for a bit are legendary warlords of the site.

ToaKraka · 1 points · Posted at 09:49:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A nice idea--but karma is created or destroyed out of thin air, not given or taken, when someone upvotes or downvotes. I think the metaphor would be more relevant to Bitcoin, if Bitcoin existed in integers rather than being infinitely divisible. 1 satoshi (the smallest denomination of bitcoin, 10-8) = 1 soldier?

RoastedMocha · 6 points · Posted at 09:59:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Idk all it takes is two humans to make another human that's pretty out of thin air lol. Also I say this for the sake of all computer scientists, please for the love of god don't talk about complex systems when it is socially irrelevant.

And no downvote, because my soldiers are pacifists and everybody goes through that phase.

ToaKraka · 2 points · Posted at 11:02:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My point is that you can trace the lineage of a person or a satoshi--or of a cent, if you don't want to bring Bitcoin into the discussion, though I'm sure that human genealogy and modern banking are just as much "complex systems" as virtual currencies are--while the same is not true of an upvote.

RoastedMocha · 1 points · Posted at 11:32:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Genealogy is much more relatable and taught in public education. And sorry if I was rude, I'm very tired. It certainly is a metaphor worth exploring, even if extremely tangential.

NOTtheSCMC · 2 points · Posted at 10:22:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just realized a general creates a horde by hoarding soldiers.

ReadyHD · 2 points · Posted at 13:34:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

horde

*hoard

**whored

MooseWolf2000 · 1 points · Posted at 09:51:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like that's just a weird game of kiss marry kill

MooseWolf2000 · 22 points · Posted at 09:50:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Checks your karma

708,585 karma

Please sir, donate to the poor?

Motorsagmannen · 1 points · Posted at 10:25:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

your karma hoard isnt obnoxious, it is pretty well rounded acutally

Realtrain · 1 points · Posted at 10:29:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
dakotathehuman · 1 points · Posted at 11:34:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm giving you more karma because your previous level of karma impressed me. Meta as fuck you professional mother fucker. Just, bravo man. Bravo

snaake07 · 1 points · Posted at 14:06:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just repost it later for some nice karma gains.

w1ls0n92 · 123 points · Posted at 10:38:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
SemmBall · 13 points · Posted at 11:16:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

God this makes the fish 100x better. Hate that original design.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

First time seeing it. I can't believe the original is worse

BevoGenocide · 3 points · Posted at 12:21:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The ones you made all look kind of stoned.

awfeel · 76 points · Posted at 10:23:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Here is an example I just threw together. I was also interested to know what it would look like

DarkNinja3141 · 1 points · Posted at 15:38:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

inhales* *boi

Klexal · 211 points · Posted at 09:52:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Matt-Head · 128 points · Posted at 09:59:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love how his tail looks so scared of him... "shit, he's angry again"

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 14:44:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fun fact: Wobbuffet is actually just the tail. The rest of him is just a decoy to take the damage from any potential attacks.

1011111100011 · 5 points · Posted at 11:00:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You know its eyes are the ones on its tail right?

Klexal · 4 points · Posted at 11:16:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not anymore!

LittleIslander · 2 points · Posted at 16:19:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah a lot of these examples are really missing the point of the pokemon they do.

R3belZebra · 7 points · Posted at 10:34:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He always looked like a pokemon to me, he didn't need the eyes. Really it makes it look kind of disturbing

velocity010 · 1 points · Posted at 11:08:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I actually would have liked Garbador with these eyes.

hoboshoe · 52 points · Posted at 06:15:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I tried but adobe is being a cunt

LeagueOfCakez · 15 points · Posted at 10:03:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

isn't it always?

Caelondian_Brushers · 1 points · Posted at 10:35:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes but Creative Cloud.

tsnErd3141 · 1 points · Posted at 13:57:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's always Gimp

intensecurry · 5 points · Posted at 15:15:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Obligatory Linux/Gimp greentext

http://imgur.com/a/s3yuc

[deleted] · 26 points · Posted at 06:59:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

confessrazia · 37 points · Posted at 08:33:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'll make a weak aura for you.

Brenttouza · 2 points · Posted at 10:21:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

huehue

mangatroll · 3 points · Posted at 09:38:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a damn good idea

tdug · 3 points · Posted at 10:16:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Someone please do the other way around.

graaahh · 15 points · Posted at 12:30:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Here you go. I'm limited to MS Paint at work but that's what I could whip up.

tdug · 2 points · Posted at 12:57:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That gave me a good morning laugh. Thanks. I love it.

johnk00 · 3 points · Posted at 10:19:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The thing is, not every old Pokemon has these kind of eyes. Check out Pikachu and the Gen 1 starters. Actually, it seems like the new set of common eyes are similar to Bulbasaur's.

drj87 · 3 points · Posted at 10:34:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well think about it back then pixel art was much more limited and making triangular eyes was much easier than making circles now with more pixels these new options are open to us also the triangles make the new pokemon look annoyed

clayRA23 · 3 points · Posted at 11:08:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't actually kept up with pokemon since like grade 5 so sorry if I chose the wrong ones, blame google but here. Slightly more productive use of insomnia than browsing reddit.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 16:08:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

clayRA23 · 2 points · Posted at 17:02:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Bahaha for real?? Well I'm pretty sure I know the starter pokemon for sun and moon since that's what I specifically searched. The other 3 were in another picture together and I believe the date for those was 2015. I think the real pokemon are the "seal", the "cat", and the "owl". I used to watch pokemon religiously from grade 3-5 but I barely remember it, and I never had a DS or gameboy or anything like my friends.

wildcaml · 3 points · Posted at 14:58:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Most of the changes look real good, but I think some of the examples are kinda off. Not all G1 eyes are the same, there are more than a few examples. Why give Vanillite Onix's eyes? Why not Clefairy's or Digglet's? Even G1 and 2 have cutesy eyes on plenty of mons, albeit in a different style. I don't have a problem with the new design, of course different artists are going to be proficient in their own style. But I couldn't imagine some of my favorite G4 mons without their eyes. Luxray, Gliscor, Staraptor, Floatzel.. they all look pretty boss.

Your Greninja, though, is perfect. That works so well and makes him look a lot more appealing to me.

DoobaDoobaDooba · 2 points · Posted at 11:20:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit! I was skeptical at first but what a difference! OP, great observation!

jackjohn920 · 2 points · Posted at 14:21:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuck you Justin

GMJizzy · 1 points · Posted at 14:23:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

;D

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 16:19:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

http://imgur.com/a/fWwcj

I tried some! started out just trying to do funny ones but some came out pretty cool!
I have absolutely nothing to do so if anyone has any ideas feel free to pm/reply and I'll do em right away ~

dougi3 · 4 points · Posted at 09:33:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

!remindme 2 days

Samtan117 · 3 points · Posted at 09:28:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

!remindme 1 day

Mazemace · -3 points · Posted at 09:29:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

lobiggz92 · 1 points · Posted at 10:37:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

SOO MUCH BETTER!!!!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:04:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At first I thought, damn this is kinda silly. Why would eyes alone be the problem? Seeing your rendition, it's now clear. It makes a bigger difference than I thought.

Burdicus · 1 points · Posted at 14:30:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit - Lycanroc really does look like a gen 1 or 2 pokemon with those eyes.

magikarpgills · 1 points · Posted at 14:55:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Could you please do Helioptile?

PurpleCows9 · -1 points · Posted at 09:32:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

Lord_stinko · -2 points · Posted at 09:33:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

BadgerBash · 0 points · Posted at 09:34:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

TheLast_Centurion · -4 points · Posted at 09:40:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

shunen · -2 points · Posted at 09:40:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Remind Me! 1 day

McLinko · -9 points · Posted at 09:24:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

Apollo9819 · -2 points · Posted at 10:00:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

CmdrLeet · -2 points · Posted at 10:16:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

Thabuffalo · -2 points · Posted at 09:45:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

RemindMe! 1 day

-Swade- · 5485 points · Posted at 09:11:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a good way to structure a conversation about art, btw.

When people are expressing preferences about something (like old vs. new) you first need to establish what the difference between old and new actually is. So many conversations about Pokemon for example devolve because people don't adequately describe the differences that their preference is based on which opens you up to the old, "There are crappy pokemon in the old games too!"

For me a big difference is that there is a much lower inclusion of "monsters" as a design element. Monsters in the kaijuu sense, so not inherently "scary" but often intimidating and aggressive looking.

And the "monster" design element has been largely replaced by anthropomorphic elements. There were anthropomorphic elements in the old games but they largely represented the weaker designs (jynx, mr. mime, etc).

The prototypical 'old' pokemon design was to start with a creature that was "cute" that would then evolve slowly into a "monster". Currently they tend to start with a creature that is "cute" but then it turns into an anthropomorphic thing. Easy starter example:

  • Charmander is cute, evolves into Charizard which is a monster

  • Fennekin is cute, evolves into a fox-lady wearing pants.

To fit the most common formula of the old games a Fennekin would have to evolve into a pokemon that was aggressive or intimidating. That's not to say 'elegance' isn't used as a design motif but it would have to be an elegant creature (i.e. Articuno) not an elegant humanoid. That is the largest difference in old vs. new designs to me and I think eye shape is a facet of that to be sure.

Now from there I personally prefer the 'monster' designs to the 'humanoid' designs. You might disagree or like both equally.

tl;dr There are fewer 'monsters' and more 'humanoids' in the new art

Whatsthisnotgoodcomp · 439 points · Posted at 09:44:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Another good example of that is probably Suicune.

Manages to look very elegant while also being serious.

-Swade- · 305 points · Posted at 10:02:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah or maybe the range or the gen I birds is a good example.

Zapdos looks like it wants to fuck you up. Articuno is very elegant and pretty. Moltres is in between-ish (like it looks pretty but inherently it looks aggro on account​ of being made of fire).

But they are all very clearly animals.

Deathless-Bearer · 394 points · Posted at 10:49:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Articuno looks like it would gracefully land next to you and maybe quietly sing a beautiful song.

Zapdos looks like it would stab you in the kidney with a fork and then steal your phone out of spite.

Iron-man21 · 38 points · Posted at 13:42:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I dunno, I've always gotten that kinda "coldly calculated and deadly" feel from Articuno. If zapdos is the spazzy one that'll stab you with a fork, Articuno is the one that'll slowly ruin your life over the course of a year just to get revenge for eating his ice cream or something.

tsnErd3141 · 7 points · Posted at 14:01:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Articuno looks like it would gracefully land next to you and maybe quietly sing a beautiful song.

Yeah. Sing me to death.

wh0c4r35 · 3 points · Posted at 19:51:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Zapdos looks like it would stab you in the kidney with a fork and then steal your phone out of spite.

That is, um, oddly specific. Are you alright, did something hurt you? Do you need a hug

ObligatoryZapdoshas

suspiciousdave · 93 points · Posted at 10:32:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really miss the real animal monster pokemon. We have some here and there in the newer games but my faves all really fall into the category. Tyranitar, suicune, milotic, ninjask, grovyle, Agron, Volcarona, Kyogre, scolopede...

(I've noticed most of these are gen 3 and earlier. Bar 2. There you go! lol)

Edit: Nidoking!! Luxray!!

immersiveGamer · 3 points · Posted at 11:55:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon rap! (Sorry, the way you listed the Pokemon I immediately started to sing it).

suspiciousdave · 9 points · Posted at 12:46:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

THERE IS 150 OR MOOOAR TO SEE, TO BE A POKEMON MASTER IS MAH, DESTINEEEEY wait there's 800+ now? I quit.

Lyesoap · 3 points · Posted at 14:27:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't really get what you mean. At least from the Sun and Moon generation, most of the pokemon look like animals. For the most part, the only ones that don't are the types that would be inorganic to begin with (rock, ghost, ice) or plants.

suspiciousdave · 5 points · Posted at 16:43:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's probably not something you'd notice if you're not actively looking for it. It's a particular way the pokemon look, not necessarily if they're animal or not. I'm wording it badly.

There's a difference between Tyranitar and, I don't know, Inciniroar. One is a spiky dinosaur with a simple and cool design. The other is a man with a cat head that shoots flames from its belt. That's the sort of difference we're going on about. It's not even a fighting type. Really, Inciniroar has no business being so man like and it's not an attractive design.

But I'm talking about Monster/animal designs. Those spiky cool looking pokemon you wouldn't mess with. Not Chansey, not Piplup, scary monster pokemon.

Anyways, my beef with the later pokemon designs are pretty much what this thread started over. They're too round and cute these days. I'd like to see more pokemon like Volcarona and even Sungaleo than a squishy mudbray or the seal starter pokemon (I forget it's name). This is just how I feel. I always liked raptors and dragons more than ponies and puppies as a kid so that's probably where this comes from.

Lyesoap · 4 points · Posted at 18:04:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One could also compare kommo-o and machamp. One is a cool plated dragony-lizard thing and the other is just a big muscly dude. There a several pokemon in the first generation alone that are pretty much just humans that look weird (machop and evolutions, jynx, Mr mime, hitmonchan, hitmonlee, and hypno). Human-like pokemon are not a recent convention.

Most pokemon are going to fall into the cute or not intimidating camp. The pokemon that are going to look most monstrous are the legendary pokemon, third level evolutions, fossil types, and the occasional outlier. These sorts are going to be vastly outnumbered by the more mundane looking pokemon that would be found in most places of the game worlds.

The art of the pokemon series has evolved over time and will probably continue to evolve. Personally, I've never really been overly fond of the Dragon Ball Z triangle eyes that were pasted on all of the early pokemon and characters, so I think it's for the better. It seems to me that a reason that people think there are more cute pokemon these days is because the character designer in the first generation didn't know how to draw more than two types of eyes.

I do apologize for going on and on about this. It just frustrates me that so many people say that all new pokemon are garbage and that the old ones were the best. Especially when they criticize the new generations for things the old ones are guilty of as well. They are clearly greatly influenced by nostalgia in these cases, but will never admit it.

suspiciousdave · 5 points · Posted at 18:35:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No no, it's fine to go on about it. Different perspectives and all that. It's good to hear them, short of an argument, lol.

It wasn't to say the past gens were perfect (I will tell you I never trained a machamp, Poliwhirl, or a hypno.) Mind you, fighting types and some psychic types were always humanoid so this doesn't entirely poke at them because it's always how things were done, and I certainly didn't train the majority of them.

I very much loved Blazikens design, but he was definitely more bird looking than human, and Gardevoir again as a psychic type because she(he) was pretty elegant.

Might be the rose tinted glasses talking, but the older designs were... Less rounded? (voltorbs and magnemites aside). Personally, I am more a dragon/fire/bug trainer myself, so I go for the more creepy, spiky designed pokemon by design anyway.

I love some of the new pokemon. Maybe the Alola Raichu and Ninetails count, but also the bug that looks like it's straight from Pacific Rim (whimpy? I forget it's pre evolution) and Solgaleo, they're all cool pokemon. Noivern was pretty damn high on my list and that rock wolf that's in this new one, Rockruffs evolution (I'm still bad at the names D:)

It's just tough because Nintendo will always cater to the younger generation, and the younger generation will always be about cute things, in their eyes I suppose.

(PS, Kommo-o was pretty damn cool, mind)

Lyesoap · 2 points · Posted at 19:33:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think we can attribute the rounding of the pokemon designs to the modern aesthetic of the pokemon games. The human characters themselves also softer and cuter looking than the older generations. In the future both cute and cool types will probably still be designed, and the old pokemon will likely be included in the games. So as long as one plays the games they will probably find something they like.

Also, we seem to like similar pokemon. I really like dinosaur, dragon, plant, and arthropod shapes. Aggron and tyrantrum are some of my favourite pokemon (but I also like a bunch of the cute ones like rowlet and eevee).

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 19:48:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is true. As long as they don't stop us from having the older pokemon with the new then we won't have too many problems lol.

I would be lying if I said I didn't like any of the cute pokemon, I guess the goofier weirder looking ones bother me is all.

All I want in my life is a Larvitar on my shoulder and a Tyranitar smashing stuff up in battle <3 lol

MacDerfus · 1 points · Posted at 19:49:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm gonna have to question your issue with mudbray, it fits the theme of the softer unevolved form and more feral evolved form.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 20:41:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Meh, I'd rather have a Ponyta or that deer that changes seasons. He's okay but I just wasn't overwhelmed by his design. And I think 'feral' is a bit of a stretch for his unevolved form.

MacDerfus · 1 points · Posted at 00:08:17 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok, yeah, a feral horse is still a horse, but yknow, it looked like it had oomph

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 10:31:32 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

It definitely has oomph, just not my cuppa tea :)

MacDerfus · 1 points · Posted at 19:46:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Solar lycanroc and muddale were pretty great designs IMO. Some alolan forms were also great. Then they make a 'mon that looks like Donald Trump...

karcholas · 4 points · Posted at 12:48:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's an intelligence there too. Like intelligent dragons in various fantasy-themed media. The dragons are often the smartest creatures in the room while looking like beasts at the same time.

4acodimetyltryptamin · 2 points · Posted at 10:34:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's in the eyes.

Squishyy_Ishii · 1 points · Posted at 14:27:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or Absol! Super elegant Pokemon... with a damned sickle on its face!

[deleted] · 766 points · Posted at 09:39:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[removed]

pacifichybrid · 587 points · Posted at 09:48:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My sister and I refer to the more recent gens as the "furry gens", with alola's starters being awkwardly humanoid.

However my sister believes this shift solidifies the theory that humans and Pokémon were once (possibly still are?) one in the same.

-Swade- · 493 points · Posted at 10:11:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The "furry gen" isssue is also why people express now that a lot of Pokemon resemble Digimon. Which pretty much always used anthropomorphic designs to mean "more powerful" (and also robot or tech parts/armor, but we aren't there yet with Pokemon).

So when people say, "This new Pokemon feels more like Digimon" it's tough to argue, monsters turning into dudes and ladies was kinda Digimon jam.

Note: I lost track of Digimon well over a decade ago so idk what they're doing now.

gublaman · 196 points · Posted at 10:47:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aside from the lower levelled ones, which were designed to look like plush toys, the anthropomorphic digimon look pretty freaking badass in comparison to pokemon's evolved anthropomorphic ones

Jani_Kani · 107 points · Posted at 11:05:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. Digimon still manage to look like monsters even while humanoid

Quetzalcaotl · 51 points · Posted at 11:59:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Notable exceptions: Angemon, Angewomon, Piedmon, etc. there were definitely several that are just straight up mystical humans.

Mainly basing this on my own memory

Jani_Kani · 8 points · Posted at 12:15:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh yeah. I mostly just remember the very early episodes of Digimon

Cptnwalrus · 23 points · Posted at 13:29:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well it's also different because they spoke English, so it didn't feel as weird when they became more humanoid. It's basically part of their whole mythos.

Pokemon were meant to be creatures you'd just find out in the woods and shit living their life.

TheFeaz · 12 points · Posted at 13:54:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's largely because Digimon has the design space for them. That's part of why I loved the early seasons aesthetically: It's not only digital, but some weird emergent manifestation, so Weregarurumon [sic.] effectively a furry dude in jeans, makes just as much sense as the ten story cyborg dinosaur, and they both make exactly as much sense as the yellow talking turd with eyes. The comparison always irks me, because Pokemon just doesn't have that kind of latitude; new Pokemon don't look like Digimon, because Digimon generally WORKED and weren't super incongruous in the style of the show.

khrysophylax · 3 points · Posted at 18:09:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well said. It's interesting to note, though, that this trope gets zig-zagged a lot in Digmon, sometimes even in the same evolutionary line: Gabumon himself goes from a giant wolf (Garurumon) to a furry wolf in jeans (WereGarurumon) to another giant cyborg wolf (MetalGarurumon).

But in general there is a distinct trend toward the highest level Digimon designs being based around humans, if not looking outright like humans in cosplay. Not saying that's bad or passing any judgment on the design choice, just noting an interesting trend.

Two of the Dark Masters are gigantic cyborg dragons (Mugendramon and MetalSeadramon) whose characters are fairly focused around brute shows of force, whereas the more dangerous of the two are the anthropomorphic and sociopathic Puppetmon and Piemon, who play really twisted mind games with the Children.

dedicated2fitness · 2 points · Posted at 15:30:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

pokemon's evolved anthropomorphic ones

you basically feel like you're leo dicaprio in django unchained when you have two anthropomorphic types fight in the newer pokemon games

Moebiuzz · 5 points · Posted at 11:04:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've always felt like someone stole electabuzz from Digimon and put it in Pokemon

Sebastopolkid · 1 points · Posted at 13:06:00 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

No way! Electabuzz is in my top 10! He's all Pokemon man!

Cpu46 · 5 points · Posted at 12:03:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Note: I lost track of Digimon well over a decade ago so idk what they're doing now.

After a decade of the Adventure series being off air it finally has a new season. Its kind of odd due to a time skip.

GooeySlenderFerret · 1 points · Posted at 15:07:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, but digimon season 1-2 is good. Season 3 is bearable and then the rest sucked

khrysophylax · 1 points · Posted at 18:06:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're definitely not wrong. My interest in Digimon tends to wax and wane based on the releases of new installments of Tri these days, but it's something I've noticed since my childhood days.

With Digimon, they often go through stages where they become fearsome monsters and end up as essentially cosplaying humans in their final forms. Examples of this include Agumon (from the fearsome, dinosaur-like Greymon and MetalGreymon to the compartively much stronger anthropomorphic WarGreymon), Palmon (from the huge Togemon to the dimunitive, fairy-like Lilymon and Rosemon), and so on. It's played even straighter with Angemon and Angewomon, as they start as small furry creatures that ultimately evolve into literal angels.

(On the other hand, the other half of the cast end up just getting larger and more monstrous as time goes on, so it's not a universal rule.)

This pattern is even followed in Tamers, where the four main characters' Digimon become progressively larger more powerful monsters and ultimately end up as fused, human sized anthros with their partners. And that's about where my knowledge ends.

AnOnlineHandle · 72 points · Posted at 10:25:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I stopped near the end of black/white after (re)playing the hell out of the first 3 generations. That theory was always an interesting possibility.

Looking at the Alola starters now, I don't think the problem is that they're humanoid. They're just too simple and their edges are too rigid, like they're all simple snouts/hard jagged hair edges/etc, they don't look like the weird mutant rodent creatures that the very first generation of pokemon did, which the anime cleaned up a bit and made presentable, but always had that weird mutant mess laying underneath it all, like you could see a glimpse of the blind wrinkled badger or whatever that it might have been in another art style.

BoogieTheHedgehog · 118 points · Posted at 10:53:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you look at this picture of all starters you can see the change in art style you've noticed. Gen 1 and 2 are pretty similar but it's a gradual change over time, they're obviously still all cartoons but the earlier gens seem more grounded in reality.

Jani_Kani · 72 points · Posted at 11:08:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look more and more polished each generation, and less realistic in my opinion. They are too "perfect"

Linubidix · 7 points · Posted at 16:51:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look like a series of shapes piled together rather than looking like an actual animal.

tack50 · 2 points · Posted at 14:19:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So you are saying we should go back to this?

:P

sorenant · 9 points · Posted at 14:24:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What's Firered/Leafgreen

Anyway it's better than Pokemon Blue's Golbat.

-The_Blazer- · 10 points · Posted at 15:31:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I know this is meant to be a joke, but there is real merit to not adding excessive detail unless you are specifically going for a VERY realistic art style. "Less is more" is often true when your characters rely heavily on a few very well-defined characteristics that have to stand out and not get drowned out in detail. It's also the reason why anime can look more "human" and relatable than high-quality CGI characters which in some cases can look downright inhuman (see: Polar Express).

That doesn't mean going all the way back to pixel art of course.

Samwise210 · 80 points · Posted at 11:09:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What the fuck the most recent grass starter literally looks like a kid in a costume.

zyocuh · 57 points · Posted at 12:30:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, that is not the "most recent" but yeah it does. This would be the most recent, http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/7/74/722Rowlet.png/250px-722Rowlet.png

SuperFishermanJack · 11 points · Posted at 14:42:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Who's that Pokemon? It's socially awkward owl!

zooicideboy · 19 points · Posted at 14:55:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oddly enough, his last evolution turns him into a sharpshooter.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 13:10:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's Louise Belcher

A_Life_of_Lemons · 2 points · Posted at 14:10:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Worst starter ever. Sun/Moon's starters (not in the image) were a big upgrade over X/Y.

squiznard · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah it's weird, all the ones before it clearly represent some kind of reptilian animal, but the new one... geez..

brickmaster32000 · -8 points · Posted at 12:36:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And ekans looked like a purple tube.

Revverb · 10 points · Posted at 13:15:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Erm - he looked like a snake. A better GenWun response would be to talk about Voltron or Grimer, possibly Shellder. Any of those work.

TheDCEUBrotendo · 2 points · Posted at 13:16:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And those are still better looking than that chipmunk thing though

CocoaBagelPuffs · 3 points · Posted at 21:15:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aw, I think he's cute :( and he turns into a tank

papereel · 1 points · Posted at 15:03:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or how three different gen 1 pokes were just purple blobs

brickmaster32000 · -3 points · Posted at 13:25:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The most generic looking snake possible. I fail to see how that's better.

kimpossible69 · 5 points · Posted at 12:17:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

http://imgur.com/uv4xqjB

Wow my lanyard is on reddit now

StarOriole · 8 points · Posted at 11:40:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm afraid I don't really see what you mean. Chespin and Charmander look similarly like kids in costumes (i.e., bipedal creatures that really shouldn't be bipedal). Turtwig doesn't seem like a less plausible turtle than Squirtle. Fenekin is an overly detailed fox, while Totodile is an overly detailed bipedal alligator. Oshawott and Chikorita are similarly "wtf animal are you supposed to be."

Different generations definitely have slightly different art styles -- e.g., Gen 1 has shadows while Gen 6 has highlights, and Gen 2 could really use some more fingers and toes -- but I don't think any of them are less realistic when taken as a trio than the others.

halaparry · 12 points · Posted at 12:02:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I disagree with the comparison of Totodile and Fenekin. I think the reason Gen 1+2 starters are so great is because they still look plausible as creatures while still having one - two unique little quirks. I feel the later gens after around 5-7 where just "how can we make theses sell" so the designs are either too detailed or too "cute" such as Fenekins dumb as fuck anime eyes

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · 2 points · Posted at 22:28:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do the early gen starters not have anime eyes? Look at Totodile and Bulbasaur

StarOriole · 1 points · Posted at 12:11:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think they both have flaws, but are both still good! On the downside, Fenekin has a freaky giant head, while Totodile has a silly pudgy baby tummy. Fenekin is made great by the giant ear hair (there are cats with huge ear hair, so it's not implausible, and it's a great reference to flames), and Totodile by the sharp teeth and the tongue (obviously cool and realistic). The eyes seem pretty similar to me -- Fenekin's got some nice slyness near the nose, while Totodile has bitchin' winged eyeliner.

halaparry · 6 points · Posted at 12:15:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just find Fenekin too cutesy, it would be alright if it turned into some bad ass like sorcerer witch thing but it's just some lame witch with a dress. And yeah Totodile has little chubby tummy but its cool how it starts as this little tubby thing with a huge mouth into a giant badass thing with a jaw that would fuck your head

StarOriole · 11 points · Posted at 12:34:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's probably just cultural that you find Delphox lame! She's actually a priestess, not a witch. You can tell because she's wearing red hakama pants and wielding a variant of a tamagushi branch as a weapon. As mentioned before, foxes are also very commonly worshiped in Shinto and well-known to hang around shrines.

So, Delphox is a bad-ass priestess, like a demon fox who decided to cut out the middle-man and run her shrine by herself. Or maybe burninate the town for giving her crappy saké.

halaparry · 5 points · Posted at 12:36:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Woah thanks for the explanation about it thats actually super cool, knowing that now though it makes me wish they had done more with her design im really not a fan of it, especially the humanoid-ness of it

StarOriole · 3 points · Posted at 12:47:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's fair! Ninetales is a pretty awesome alternative version of how cool a demon fox can be. It's also way less freaky to pet a Ninetales than a Delphox in Pokémon Amie.

I feel like I'm betraying my preferred series by saying this, but I do like both Ninetales and Delphox better than Digimon's Kyubimon and Taomon. Both of those are just too full of religious symbolism -- braided ropes! Bells! Souls! Yin-yang symbols! Talismans! Hats! They wanted to make it absolutely impossible to miss that the fox had become a formalized practitioner of the spiritual arts, and the designs wound up too cluttered as a result (at least for my taste). Both Ninetales and Delphox seem a bit more plausible as actual animals.

superscatman91 · 3 points · Posted at 15:19:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For me, the issue is that they didn't keep it simple. Look at the early gen Pokemon.

A shell on his back, a bulb on his back, a little flame on the tail. Fairly plain otherwise. The later gens. Fur tufts coming out of ears, off the face, off the hind legs. Seashell on it's chest, frilly colllar, many different colors for each body part.

It's like they felt that the Pokemon was too boring so they kept adding details and lining off sections of their body to color a different color.

Ithinkandstuff · 2 points · Posted at 15:01:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also, they have lost little details. First gen starters have little claws on their feet, tiny fangs, small detail lines around the body that give it more shape and depth. These details seem to deminish as you go to the right, the bodies are round and 2-dimensional looking.

Danger-Wolf · 1 points · Posted at 14:11:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 5 was where it really shifted.

Flashyshooter · 1 points · Posted at 19:12:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This isn't a picture of all the starters because sun and moon are missing.

kibbles0515 · 0 points · Posted at 14:46:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Black and White is where the design takes a turn for the worse.

brickmaster32000 · 2 points · Posted at 12:35:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're just too simple

A lot of the original Pokemon were incredibly simple. I always use geodude as my example because they wanted a rock Pokemon so they just drew a clump of rocks/mud and called it good. Simialarly ekans is just a tube vaquely resembling a snake.

One of the things I like about the newer generations is that there are so many design elements in each pokemon that you can see have a clearly defined purpose. For example to contrast with geodude/golem look at nosepass/probopass. The shape is now a nod to the easter island statues instead of just a clump that gets bigger. Things like his iron shaving beard and red compass nose reinforce the idea that he is a magnetic pokemon. He even has miny probes pointing in the other three cardinal directions

AzureSkye · 2 points · Posted at 11:43:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My personal theory is that Pokemon are a Universe virus that infect and convert everything to itself like Tiberium. Like there used to be numerous references to other animals, but that's become less and less in the series. Everything not human is now Pokemon. Eventually, even the people will be Pokemon and all will be one.

pacifichybrid · 2 points · Posted at 22:18:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I prefer this theory tbh.

SimplisticBiscuit · 2 points · Posted at 12:04:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One and* the same

pacifichybrid · 1 points · Posted at 22:22:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL

_____KALROG · 2 points · Posted at 14:11:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

League of Legends is moving in the same direction, haha. My boyfriend calls the new lore region they just announced last week "furrytown"

He seems mildly annoyed about it, but me, I just see there must be a market for it. There is nothing holy about LoL or its champ roster! (Kinda feel the same way about pokemon)

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 15:52:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Okay I was seriously pissed when my cool cat thing turned into some emo kid's Sonic OC in S/M.

ThanosDidNothinWrong · 2 points · Posted at 10:32:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

humans and Pokémon were once (possibly still are?) one in the same

then how come humans can say things other than their name?

maybe each human is a different kind of pokemon, and they just have a really long name, which they say once drawn out over the course of many years and then die.

cookiemonster279 · 5 points · Posted at 10:43:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe they aren't saying their "name" as they know it, maybe we just named them after their main call or vocalisation.

pacifichybrid · 1 points · Posted at 10:41:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The theory is that much like how human evolved alongside apes, humans in the Pokémon world did the same.

There are also man made Pokémon, ghost Pokémon that are literally human ghosts, and Pokémon that would not exist without technology and modern advancements. Meaning that Pokémon are still evolving, which may also be why newer gens are more human like.

There's still a lot of grey area in this theory though. Personally I just enjoy the games and I like how cute everything has become.

BiffManly · 1 points · Posted at 13:50:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean, if we're talking pokemon that look too much like humans...

http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/e/ec/122Mr._Mime.png/250px-122Mr._Mime.png

http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/7/7c/124Jynx.png/250px-124Jynx.png

http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/8/8e/067Machoke.png/250px-067Machoke.png

I'll take a tiger that acts like a luchador over a man in a speedo with a dinosaur head

radicallyhip · 1 points · Posted at 10:43:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it could be considered as an expression of humanity being the 'real monster' in the Pokemon universe.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 12:52:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is some prequel explanation level shit.

pacifichybrid · 1 points · Posted at 10:46:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Considering Pokémon constantly tackles issues of human greed and environmentalism in their movies (Celebi and jirachi) that's a really good point.

babybelly · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

humans can turn to abra

-Swade- · 93 points · Posted at 09:50:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well the tough part is there are a pretty crazy amount of outliers (in both old and new).

I feel like the starters are the best things to compare if you're looking for trends as they will always fit a similar category in that they have three evolutionary stages (ignoring mega), generally receive a lot of attention and revision from the design team, will probably be used heavily in the marketing for the new game, and will probably be featured heavily in the new anime.

That as a framework makes it easier to compare. Otherwise you can get into apples and oranges as you compare an honestly throwaway Pokemon from one gen vs an important Pokemon from another gen. I feel like that happens a lot in conversations.

HumanAtlas · 3 points · Posted at 15:36:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like the starters are more the exception this rule is based on, rather than the rule for the generations.

These past two generations have had exceptionally humanoid starters, while most of the other Pokemon in their generations have not be very humanoid (with exceptions like Tsareena). While Gen 1 did have many monster designs, it also had a fair amount of humanoid designs.

I'd say the difference is more close to: Gen 1 designs tended to look like animals made into Kaiju esq monsters, while later generations have their Pokemon look like the animal/object their based on combined with one or two ideas.

Like how Kriketune is a cricket and an instrument/conductor. Or how Vanilux is an ice cream cone and an icicle.

For gen 1 we have a few: Lapras is a plesiosaur and a ferry, Far-fetched is a duck, but also references a saying about a convenient event, and Meowth is a cat, but is also inspired by a saying.

But it's more common for Gen 1 to have: Rhydon- a dinosaur Rhino, Seel- a seal with a horn, Beedrill- a big bee with many stingers, Venumoth- a poison moth.

Jani_Kani · 4 points · Posted at 11:13:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, as well as the basic bird and the basic normal type.

Officer_Warr · 2 points · Posted at 13:25:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. Fennikin's a good example, as all three starters from Gen VI progress into more of anthropomorphic style. And in Gen VII, the starters there also have do something similar: The cat's an antagonistic wrestler (and upright), the owl's a bowman (and uses one), and the seal is a siren (and grew hair, and wears accessories).

This is a very revelating thread.

Motorsagmannen · 1 points · Posted at 10:33:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

damn furries, ruining everything /s
:P

red18hawk · 462 points · Posted at 10:05:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I played pokemon moon recently as someone who hasn't really played pokemon since Red/Blue and I was rather surprised that my fire breathing cat evolved into a furry wrestler who shot fireballs from his dick cannon. I thought I would have ended up with.... you know... a bigger cat.

TwinMarsh · 82 points · Posted at 10:38:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had the same issue. I managed to avoid most spoilers for the Gen 7 games, and was disappointed when Tarrocat evolved. Spent the next day or two finding a decent Fire type replacement and leveling it up.

full-wit · 7 points · Posted at 14:55:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I know Incineroar isn't real but this made me sad

HiYesThisIsMichael · 5 points · Posted at 13:44:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just looked this up, really? I thought he kind of looked cool with the level up.

Although I can see if most of them were humanoid that this would be annoying.

shadyultima · 11 points · Posted at 14:13:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I did that same, didn't allow myself to see the final. Though I love incineroar, I was initially very disappointed in the final form. It's cool, but ever fire type starter has become anthromorphic since gen 3, and I was hoping for a huge fire tiger

TwinMarsh · 21 points · Posted at 14:27:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I was so glad when I evolved my Litten into Torracat because I still think it's one of my favourite Pokemon designs, and as it evolved from Litten I kept saying to myself "please don't be bipedal". And then the final evolution completely scrapped the direction it was going in of making it look like a wild cat, and instead it became a luchador with a fiery dick cannon.

hydro0033 · 3 points · Posted at 15:09:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep, they lost their touch.

th30be · 3 points · Posted at 17:16:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not only that but became fire fighitng types. Don't get me wrong I love my Blazakin but that is the only one I liked.

CocoaBagelPuffs · 5 points · Posted at 21:19:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Plus it made sense for that one to stay biped, along with Infernape. Their inspirations mostly walk on two legs anyway. But Gen 5 on? No excuse there. Although, Emboar does look similar to Beast Ganon.

th30be · 3 points · Posted at 21:27:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, the original ganon was a two legger but the rest of them were on all 4s.

CocoaBagelPuffs · 3 points · Posted at 21:46:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Beast Ganon has only had designs where he's on all 4s in spin-offs and Twilight Princess.

th30be · 1 points · Posted at 22:27:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Breath of the wild had a 4 legged ganon. I know there are more. Just can't remember right now.

What do you mean by spin offs?

CocoaBagelPuffs · 1 points · Posted at 22:53:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Spin-offs as in Hyrule Warriors and other non-canon/Third Party Zelda titles.

I haven't gotten a chance to play BOTW yet so I don't know what Ganon looks like in that one.

th30be · 1 points · Posted at 23:45:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Besides HW, what else is there?

CocoaBagelPuffs · 1 points · Posted at 07:45:01 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those CDi games, like Link: Faces of Evil.

[deleted] · 120 points · Posted at 10:23:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really don't like Incineroar. At least he's not fire/fighting.

Kered13 · 43 points · Posted at 11:32:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Barely.

SimplyQuid · 11 points · Posted at 16:28:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuck, I would have been okay with fire fighting if it wasn't another goddamn bipedal humanoid.

Flashyshooter · 3 points · Posted at 19:13:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If that happened ppl would be pissed.

Lucifer-Prime · 2 points · Posted at 14:34:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Alola starters

I was surprised when I saw his final form. Looks like a character from adventure time. I haven't played the recent ones. Looks like I'll stick with Gen 1 & 2.

[deleted] · 10 points · Posted at 15:09:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Alola was amazing overall. If you skip out just because of Incineroar you're missing out, gen VII is where it's at.

Lucifer-Prime · 1 points · Posted at 15:14:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It isn't the one Pokémon but the overall design difference. I started to lose interest a long time ago. Gotta Catch 'Em All just doesn't seem so appealing anymore with all the junk they added later.

Moon_Pearl · 2 points · Posted at 16:32:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never played these games so I just googled Incineroar and OH MY GOD HOW IS THAT A POKEMON

sparky662 · 27 points · Posted at 11:54:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really don't like Incineroar, I think it crossed the line into looking too human like. I think it's the 'muscle man' body proportions and more human like hands and feet that ruin it.

On the other hand I really like some of the more anthropomorphic designs, such as Delphox, Lucario and Zoroark. But to me their body proportions and features still look animal like. They look like an animal on two legs, not some weird animal-human mash up like Incineroar does.

Thinking about it, besides Incineroar, what other current gen Pokemon would you consider to be human like? I can't actually think of any off the top of my head.

Perhaps it's not necessarily that there are a lot more human like Pokemon in each generation, but that they get more focus. Lucario and Zoroark both had feature films, Delphox, Chespin and Incineroar are starters etc.

red18hawk · 9 points · Posted at 14:13:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't mind human looking pokemon per se but I certainly wasn't expecting it from my little cat. Plus is made grooming him super awkward. I signed up to pet and brush and give treats to a cute little kitten thingy and now the giant guy who just crotch drilled someone into a wrestling ring wants me to towel off his chest.
My rival had the owl guy and he was starting to cross that creepy line too.

sparky662 · 12 points · Posted at 14:44:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon refresh can get awkward with a lot of Pokemon. They start off cute then suddenly it gets a bit weird.

relevant

charchomp · 2 points · Posted at 22:27:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The only other ones that come to mind are the other 7th gen starters final evolutions, and salazzle

sparky662 · 1 points · Posted at 05:47:32 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

They did cross my mind but I wouldn't say they were particularly human like. Primarina is a seal, Decidueye stands on two legs but is basically a big owl and as for Salazzle, many lizards will stand on two legs when fighting, running etc. and their body proportions don't look particularly human. I can see why you would list them though as they do seem to be closer to humans that many other Pokemon.

suspiciousdave · 24 points · Posted at 10:40:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's what we had all hoped for I think.. It doesn't even move like a pokemon, it spins around like a freaking dreidal.

I gotta ask, what was your impression of the game overall when compared to red and blue?

Bluebe123 · 45 points · Posted at 11:10:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean, so does Hitmontop, but it's okay if you forgot about him because most of us did, too.

suspiciousdave · 12 points · Posted at 11:21:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha, you're right. But he was a fighting type, and his head was made for it. What was the fire cat man's excuse?

Skyy-High · 28 points · Posted at 11:42:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He's a heel wrestler. That's why he's part dark type. He's a showman, an entertainer, and he especially loves pissing people off with his excessive showboating.

So, sounds like mission accomplished.

suspiciousdave · 7 points · Posted at 11:51:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nicely done, fire-cat-beef-cake, nicely done.

Matazaonreddit · 5 points · Posted at 14:41:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In my days, humanoid monsters were either psycho or fighting type, and didn't evolve from cats.

co99950 · 6 points · Posted at 11:38:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dont forget spinda.

suspiciousdave · 4 points · Posted at 11:48:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yo, don't pick on my boi Spinda. He doesn't spin so much as... Totter. Spinda for life <3

Bluebe123 · 2 points · Posted at 19:12:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He walks. The spinning is just from his signature move.

suspiciousdave · 0 points · Posted at 19:22:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But why does he need to spin? The most important questions, asked right here.

Bluebe123 · 3 points · Posted at 19:23:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Style

Lexifox · 4 points · Posted at 13:16:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hitmontop is actually pretty common in competitive play.

oGeyra · 3 points · Posted at 13:44:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hit...mon...TOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOPTOP

red18hawk · 5 points · Posted at 14:00:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It was an enjoyable nostalgic experience. I really liked the system that showed which moves were effective against an enemy after you had already encountered one, so I didn't have to keep looking up charts or whatnot. I got nowhere close to completing the pokedex and there were quite a few features (like the social island or whatnot) that I didn't feel compelled to bother with.
Overall it is not going to make me a hardcore fan of the series again or anything but I am glad I played it.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 11:55:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i havent even completed the damn thing!

i just beat the fat kid who is a leader or somert.

its just so boring

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 13:27:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:35:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

so after i finish beating these retarded dancing opponents the game becomes fun?

suspiciousdave · 0 points · Posted at 12:44:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Go and get Alpha sapphire man or x and y if you want a half decent game. They really fell flat on this one :( any game with unskippable cutscenes is sinful.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 12:47:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have Y it was good apart from the troupe of kids that follow you round and wont fucking leave you alone

suspiciousdave · 3 points · Posted at 12:53:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It kinda shows where the descent into sun and moon began. At least they more or less fuck off for the most part later on.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 13:12:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They just wont leave you alone, its pointless. Its like your target audience are 20+year olds. theyve played since red/blue they dont need some quirky troupe of gimps harassing you at every fucking town

Im just hoping they rerelease heartgold etc on the nintendo eshop.

Its a no brainer as EVERYONE will buy them all.

Hell i bought yellow AND blue again

berychance · 3 points · Posted at 21:13:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its like your target audience are 20+year olds.

But it's not. Their target audience is 5-10 year-olds—just like those 20+ year-olds when they played Red/Blue.

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 22:14:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

really? REALLY?! you genuinely think 5-10 year olds understand IVs/EVs?

The dark and gloomy dex entries we can read are for 5-10 year olds?

berychance · 1 points · Posted at 00:20:33 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

How old is the typical player character? 10-12. How old is Ash? 10. It's clearly a franchise targeted at children.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 07:08:20 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

youre on crack if you believe the game is not also aimed at this age group too

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 16:33:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh man. I have my yellow version and my old game boy colour but I bought yellow on eshop and played the hell out of it while I was on holiday. Those games weren't as in depth as the ones we have now but there's literally joy in the simple concept of those old games. And I might even buy soul silver again. Loved that game to pieces. Even the athletic mini games were alright, lol.

There is nothing wrong with having a vague story in a game. Something to give it depth so you aren't wondering around for no reason but not so much that you feel they're ramming it down your throat.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:55:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It wasnt THAT vague when you think about it, its vague now because we all know what pokemon to get and grind with.

the joy of the first 3 gens (just about 3) was oh shit new pokemon!!!! but now its so far in theres literally no point in changing your team set up because you know whats good from the previous 6 gens.

Back to rebuying games though - if nintendo/gs want money just 'remaster' those old games and put them ont eh fucking ds

Slardar · 3 points · Posted at 13:35:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A what that shoots what from it's dick cannon?! What Pokemon is this lol

red18hawk · 7 points · Posted at 13:50:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did a quick search for the videos, sorry that quality is not great. Wrestler Cat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ieu_mkCpaY Flaming Dick Cannon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwYWRn9nmrs

Slardar · 4 points · Posted at 13:55:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He actually....shoots......fire from his dick. I'll be damned.

BipolarFox · 4 points · Posted at 10:55:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haven't played since Ruby. Thought you were joking, but.. yeah. Flaming crotch cannon.

th30be · 2 points · Posted at 17:17:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

dick cannon

This is definitely the best way to describe this.

formlessfish · 2 points · Posted at 11:32:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the reason they didn't make him into a larger fire Cat is because he would too closely resemble Pyroar. I think the wrestler heel image would make more sense if his second form had any hint of the transition instead of just becoming a larger cat.

Houdiniman111 · 1 points · Posted at 12:32:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. Lots of evolutions are hardly related.
At least with something like Torchic, it gets arms and whatnot in its second evolution. It goes from an underdeveloped fire chicken to a mean fire chicken with arms to a monster sized fire chicken that can kick your sorry butt. Would have made more sense if it had some form of arm while a torchic, but at least the second evolution is comparative to the third.

_91919 · 1 points · Posted at 13:51:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are there any Pokemon games that stick with the 150/151 original Gen I Pokemon but have a different storyline/map to Red/Blue? Cause that'd be awesome.

turmacar · 2 points · Posted at 15:21:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fire Red / Leaf Green might be the closest.

I think they add in some of the Gold/Silver Pokemon too though.

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

tbf he is inspired by a manga based on American culture

CarrEternal · 1 points · Posted at 13:41:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And if it evolved into a bigger cat, then people would mock it for just being a bigger cat.

Greckit · 125 points · Posted at 10:04:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For reference here's Fennekin, its first evolution and its final form. It really does go from a cute animal to a more humanoid appearance.

cqz · 159 points · Posted at 10:35:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This threw me so bad while playing Y

I thought Fennekin was the coolest starter

but it turned into some kind of witch lady thing with massive ear hairs >:(

StarOriole · 143 points · Posted at 11:57:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That one at least wasn't a surprise, considering that foxes being able to transform into people is a common part of Japanese mythology. Other common tropes are them growing more tails as they get older (like Vulpix and Ninetales), playing tricks on people, and needing to be bribed with alcohol to keep them from destroying your rice field.

Similarly, it makes sense that Mario's raccoon suit lets him shapeshift and fly, because that's what raccoons do.

It would be sort of like a Western game having an awkward duck evolve into a swan (immediately recognizable as The Ugly Duckling) and the swan evolve into a feathered woman (Swan Lake). It's a logical progression once you look at it, even if you'd personally prefer to get a horse-sized duck at the end.

the_real_slim_Shadix · 29 points · Posted at 13:26:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Coincidentally enough, this was already done in Gen 5 with Ducklett and Swanna. That generation was based on the US and introduced many American-inspired pokemon.

LovePolice · 8 points · Posted at 14:53:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wasn't it done with Feebas to Milotic though? At least thematically... Feebas was ugly and you had to raise it's beauty enough for it to evolve. This was only possible with particular Feebas with the right starting stats as well.

Also, The Ugly Duckling isn't an American story. It's Danish (H.C. Andersen) but widespread and well known in all of the western world.

Slipin2dream · 5 points · Posted at 17:40:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah but I believe that comparison takes the ugly duckling idea from a literal to the figurative. So in practice they explored the idea twice.

InsaneZee · 2 points · Posted at 05:29:54 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Feebas never needed the right stats in the originals. Just needed to increase beauty to maximum and then level up by 1 level.

LovePolice · 1 points · Posted at 12:01:50 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

But wasn't there a point where pokemon would refuse any more pokeblocks? Only allowing those with the right preference to be able to reach maximum.

Geoffron · 31 points · Posted at 12:15:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd rather have 100 duck-sized horses, myself.

gamerpenguin · 1 points · Posted at 22:14:07 on April 23, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what you get when breeding for shiny ponyta

Neander7hal · 8 points · Posted at 13:11:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Supposedly the devs wanted to go with a classic RPG theme for the starters in Gen 6, so the three final starters were designed to match RPG archetypes. Delphox is the Mage, Chesnaught is the Warrior, and Greninja is the Rogue.

janiekh · 2 points · Posted at 12:18:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I picked Froakie and I couldn't be happier :P

I still switched him out though, because I don't need 2 water pokemon and Wailmer is life

MacDerfus · 1 points · Posted at 19:56:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wish you could get hidden abilities more readily. Froakie can be whatever type you want it to be.

GeneralRane · 2 points · Posted at 14:10:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. I went in blind. When I started X after being Y, I got Froakie.

anotherfan123 · 1 points · Posted at 14:05:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I understand, but aren't ear hairs the defining features of the real fennec fox?

MacDerfus · 1 points · Posted at 19:54:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You get a gen 1 starter anyway in X/Y, though

Bamith · 1 points · Posted at 12:36:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Middle evolution makes for the best rule 34 though, magical girl all the way.

Revverb · 0 points · Posted at 13:20:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Found the furry

It's okay, though, buddy - I'm with ya <3

Faehrtalt · 3 points · Posted at 10:22:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Greckit · -1 points · Posted at 10:44:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

uhhh...for reference? NSFW

____------- · 1 points · Posted at 10:56:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

403 Forbidden

Greckit · -1 points · Posted at 11:02:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks, fixed it. The imagehosting on hentai sites is obviously more complicated than bulbapedia...

ParryDotter · 3 points · Posted at 11:09:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

...why is it holding a flaming stick?

Seriously, it looks like it could be a cool design, and then they ruin it with that fucking stick. It's like if they gave Masterchief a butter-knife.

sparky662 · 6 points · Posted at 13:02:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's supposed to be a witch/wizard so the stick is used like a wand. It's a fire/psychic type, so it keeps the sick up it's 'sleeve' and when it wants to attack it pulls the stick out fast enough to ignite it against it's rough fur, then uses psychic powers to manipulate the flames on the end of the stick. I actually like the idea, it makes a change from most fire types that just breathe fire. If you look at the middle evolution it uses a similar concept, but keeps the stick in it's tail.

PineappleSlices · 5 points · Posted at 12:22:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a witch. The middle form has the stick stuck by its tail, which also makes it look like a broom, while the last form just sticks (heh) to using it as a magic wand.

beldr · 2 points · Posted at 11:30:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the same reason farfetch'd had a leak I suppose?

evolpert · 5 points · Posted at 13:18:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Farfetch'd have a leak because the idea of a duck walking around with the main ingredient for it's soup it's a farfetched idea, and a proverb in china if i'm not mistaken

ParryDotter · 3 points · Posted at 12:22:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At least he is a small duck... thing...

Imagine if they had Blastoise holding the leak instead

Dejected-Angel · 1 points · Posted at 11:53:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Still love it tbh.

Rain12913 · 1 points · Posted at 12:03:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't played since the original games; is this one of the new ones that people are complaining about? Because to me, that doesn't look like a Pokémon at all. It looks like a talking animal from an animated film.

Megaman0WillFuckUrGF · 1 points · Posted at 13:22:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its final form reminds me of the tree monsters in dark souls 3

Ak_Jumper_942 · 81 points · Posted at 09:47:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Completely unrelated, but i see the exact same problem often occuring as well in the halo community, with people arguing between bungie vs. 343's art style.

cpt_pancreas · 140 points · Posted at 10:14:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As in the 343 let's make everything look angular and like it came out of a Michael Bay transformers film, opposed to bungies more organic, living material designs?

R3belZebra · 61 points · Posted at 10:39:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, Jesus Christ thank you for putting my thoughts to words. Everything is so bulgy and shiny and colorful and weird. Bungee made it look like it was human tech in the actual future

FishbowlSouls · 9 points · Posted at 11:11:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You know, always had a hard time describing why I didn't like the general art style in the newer Halo's, this pretty much nails it though. However I will say that it's nice that 343 gets to use newer tech, so the cutscenes are pretty awesome at times. Did 343 do the cutscenes in 2 remastered? Because that was some cinema quality shit

cpt_pancreas · 13 points · Posted at 11:28:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think that the cutscenes are Blur Studios. They are known for those insanely cinematic videos. They did the Star Wars Old Republic Trailers too.

FishbowlSouls · 4 points · Posted at 11:59:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha figures, that shit was tight. Just looked them up, they also did the cutscenes for Halo Wars and also HW2 apparently

NextArtemis · 2 points · Posted at 16:05:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Angular has nothing wrong, it just seems super out of place compared to the older games, since you already have an established view of how it looks so the change makes it feel wrong.

If you started someone playing Halo on 343, then showed them the originals, they'd feel bungie was off.

Ak_Jumper_942 · 2 points · Posted at 17:58:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep. Have yer hundredth upvote on me, couldnt have said it better myself.

cpt_pancreas · 1 points · Posted at 19:44:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Weirdly i hadn't even thought about it till i saw the comment I responded too. But straight away i just knew what the difference in the art styles was.

Gatorfolk · 9 points · Posted at 10:14:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eyes have really changed in Halo over the years. :)

Metalsonic20 · 6 points · Posted at 10:43:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Someone make the Chief with angry Pokemon eyes :P

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 10:19:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So new Spartans are cuter, anthro non-monsters?

R3belZebra · 2 points · Posted at 10:40:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Game Over

Continue

*Exit

altmetalkid · 3 points · Posted at 11:12:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think that's at least partly why Halo Wars 2 was so well received. It brought with it a return of many elements of the old art style while not completely throwing out the changes 343 had made.

On personal note, I've been a Halo fan since I was like 8 and I don't get the rage against the new games. "They changed it, now it sucks" as an argument is tiresome. Are there things I don't like about the new games? Absolutely. The art style seems off to me, almost kinda power ranger-y, and I don't really like fighting the Prometheans. Halo 4 might have been my least favorite, but I have had fun with many of the new elements in 5. The added mobility, weapon variety, etc.

People wanted more Halo, but Bungie passed the torch, so this is what you get, guys. Things can't just stay the same. Has it changed too much? In some ways maybe, but I didn't think Halo was gonna make it too much longer without a sprint button.

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · 4 points · Posted at 15:17:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I don't want things to stay entirely the same in a series either. That would get tedious (Pokemon is a good example of this). As for Halo, I haven't played Halo 5, but I played all the others, and 4's changes were enough to turn me off. So, I agree that things must change, but some directions of change are better than others. Things can change for the worse; I found that to be the case with 343's direction of the series.

I'm glad people seem to like Halo 5 -- it looks like a marked improvement over 4 -- but I believe the series deserves to be in better hands, which I didn't think previously.

This is also all in relation to the multiplayer aspect. I thought 4's campaign was fine.

altmetalkid · 2 points · Posted at 15:32:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I definitely do not like the Prometheans, I miss a couple of Covenant species that haven't been around in a while, and I don't like many elements of the new art style, but having played Halo 5 (I don't own it but I spent a long night playing multiplayer), I consider the fluidity changes welcome. I've always considered the base movement speed too slow. I mean it's fine on it's own, but there are times some extra speed would help. They introduced it in Reach, obviously, but having it available at all times was a good move. Being able to ADS with all weapons is also great because it gives some automatic weapons ba bit more utility. I think the thruster evade is a little clunky and that the evade roll in Reach was better, but the vertical mobility the jetpack gives is great. I also had a ton of fun with Warzone.

I'm gonna hope that the campaigns get longer (they won't), pure firefight comes back, and the art style starts to move closer to HW2's happy medium, but I can say that I'm much happier with Halo 5 than Halo 4.

YOUR_DEAD_TAMAGOTCHI · 2 points · Posted at 15:46:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I heard in 5, they fixed/removed the armor ability situation from Halo 4, which sounds like an improvement to me. My biggest gripe with 4 was that everyone could start with plasma grenades which made vehicles (my favorite mode of deathmaking) deathtraps themselves, but I heard they removed that in 5 too. So, while I haven't played it, combine that with what you said, and I would firmly bet that it's an improved game, even if it's not perfect. As long as they're trying their own things.

I used to always play as an Elite in multiplayer, I would like that back. Also being able to play as a grunt somehow would be awesome.

altmetalkid · 1 points · Posted at 16:00:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My view of 5 is that it's clearly a direct sequel to 4, but that it takes just about everything 4 does and does it better. Doesn't mean it dies everything better, but just about all of the gameplay complaints people had got taken into account as far as I can tell, and even some of the things that weren't bad but were just advice got taken into account as well.

I do lament that removed option, and I really liked playing as an Elite in Reach with the Ultra armor. Not sure if that'll ever come back though, because Elites have changed. Not necessarily in a bad way, but just with the way Elites are built and the way they move now, it's less plausible. In Halo 3 they were more compact, kinda hunched over. Now I feel like it would be unbalanced because it would be harder to fit a fair hitbox onto an Elite for MP. As for playable Unggoy, the only way I can ever see that happening is if they did something like Mass Effect MP. Playing as a Grunt in competitive would end pretty badly.

IMALEFTY45 · 3 points · Posted at 17:24:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Here's my rendition of how playing a grunt would go:

Grunt sneaks up on assuming Spartan

Pew pew pew

Spartan loses 1/4 shields

Spartan turns around

Pop

YAAAAAAAYYYYYY

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:05:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Halo Wars 2 was also developed by Games Workshop/SEGA.

Edit: Meant Creative Assembly, not Games Workshop

altmetalkid · 2 points · Posted at 14:20:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pardon? It was a collaborative effort between Creative Assembly and 343i.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:21:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I meant Creative Assembly! Brain fart, haha.

But Creative Assembly are actually owned by SEGA.

altmetalkid · 1 points · Posted at 14:24:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh wow, you are correct. I had no idea. That seems kinda odd to me, considering Sega themselves aren't really known for anything good these days. The RTS games CA makes don't seem to fit well in Sega's wheelhouse, but then again, they've published shooters too, so I digress.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 14:32:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sega still has some great games, they have just had to diversify in recent years. I recently really enjoyed Yakuza 0 on PS4. They also own Atlus, who makes some of the most popular JRPGs, such as the SMT/Persona series.

altmetalkid · 1 points · Posted at 14:37:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I suppose I'm referring more to their in-house stuff. At least I think it's in-house. I remember a while back, might've been six months, a year, whatever, they sent out this open survey where it was asking about various Sega properties. What sticks out as great franchise, what do you know Sega best for, etc. I may be a little better acquainted now, but at the time it was just "Sonic. I know Sega for Sonic. And the Dreamcast, but I sorta missed the boat on that one."

Mnstrzero00 · 1 points · Posted at 18:52:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I vastly prefer 343's style in Halo. But I prefer Destiny's art style over any Halo game. What am I...

Ak_Jumper_942 · 1 points · Posted at 19:12:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

343's style isnt necessarily bad (other then the lighting engine if you count that as part of it), it just doesnt fit the series nearly as much imo because it destroyed consistency and doesnt have the look of functionality or practicality to back up how much the series strived for realism in a future-sci fi setting, as far as the human technology went at least. I too agree though that bungie's work in destiny is beautiful, year 1 was rough in some places and had some serious problems that shouldnt just be swept under the rug but i liked how much the game expanded and improved over time. Cant wait to see what D2 brings!

AntiPrompt · 159 points · Posted at 09:51:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wonder how this relates to another common complaint about new Pokemon--that they're too "busy" and the older generations were simpler, had less unnecessary detail. Just from a cursory look at the Gen 7 dex, it seems to me that the un-anthropomorphic monster-type Pokemon are far more detailed than the anthropomorphic ones. This is evident even in the starters. Incineroar, Decidueye, and Primarina are all pretty detailed, but they get more detailed as they get less humanoid (it's Incineroar>Decidueye>Primarina in descending order of humanoid-ness, I think).

I wonder if Gamefreak/Nintendo felt that the "monster" category of Pokemon was becoming depleted and less fruitful over time, and decided to shift toward anthropomorphic designs in order to ensure that new Pokemon still had their own distinctive identity and personality, while adding more and more detail to the "monster" Pokemon in order to keep them interesting and unique. But maybe that's my own bias coming through, since I do personally think the newer "monster" Pokemon have generally gotten less distinctive and more excessively detailed over time.

[deleted] · 28 points · Posted at 10:21:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It'd be interesting if they released an art book with the process designs of all of the new pokemon compared to the older ones, I think.

theivoryserf · 18 points · Posted at 11:30:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed, I think there are a few factors why the new ones feel so anonymous:

-The first generation had nothing to compare with, so it was easier to seem original and so poorer designs were just accepted

-Most of us were kids with few critical faculties. We didn't spot the on-the-nose portmanteau naming and simpler designs that we'd analyse now

-Pokemon had complete cultural saturation in the late 90s - my 80-year-old grandparents could have named at least ten Pokemon. My lunchbox was Pokemon, clothes too, the album was my favourite music, etc etc. Even the kids in the playground that didn't learn them from the cartoon, games or cards heard about them from osmosis. All this made them stick in the memory more and seem more 'legit'

-If you design a thousand of anything over 20 years, originality and consistent quality will take a hit eventually

[deleted] · 10 points · Posted at 11:49:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also as I've said in a few other places the limitations of the Gameboy versus the relatively few limitations of the 3DS means they now have a lot more freedom to design whatever the heck they want these days as opposed to before.

Dragovic · 9 points · Posted at 13:07:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think a large amount of it is just that the designers and artists got better and streamlined the process. Just compare the old art of Pidegotto to the new art. It's the same pose but the differences are pretty apparent. The old art in comparison seems more primitive and unpolished while the newer art is more polished and there's little details that don't show up in the older more utilitarian design. The old design is mostly made of simple shapes while the newer design doesn't seem to have a single straight line. Everything has a curve. I think the switch from hand drawn to digital probably introduced a lot of the elements that people tend to complain about.

Germanvuvuzela · 3 points · Posted at 17:29:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In regards to details, I think it helps to remember the circumstances of the original 151. Red and Green were released on the Gameboy; it was literally impossible to design a Pokemon beyond a certain level of complexity. As such a lot of people subscribe to the idea that simple = good classic Pokemon and detailed = bad overdesigned Pokemon.

Conveying a humanoid, anthropological Pokemon using archaic sprites is no easy feet; there's a reason the bigger/humanoid Pokemon look cramped or excessively stylized in the original spritework, resulting perhaps in Pokemon that better fit the Gameboy medium. This extends to colors as well; Pokemon with a huge array of colors don't start to appear until the 4th gen, really, and rare early examples are poorly represented in game. As a 10 year old I scoffed when I encountered Ho-Oh the "rainbow" Pokemon in Gold version.

Tfish · 1 points · Posted at 16:27:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seeing as how about half of gen 1 was basically just normal animals with a different color palate I'm not really seeing it.

BigPalmtree · 101 points · Posted at 09:41:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This needs to be at the top. Very clear and spot on observation without too much excessive jabber. I never saw it that way but really noticed it as you described it.

Well done.

FilteringAccount123 · 2 points · Posted at 21:09:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had the opposite problem: I've always felt like the new pokemon designs somehow looked fundamentally different from the old designs I grew up with, but I could never place my finger on exactly what was different about them.

So thanks, OP!

bobotheking · 139 points · Posted at 10:05:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You know, I completely agree with you, and yet...

I have a specific counterexample in mind regarding legendary pokemon that's bothered me lately. Take a look at Mewtwo. Ah, a classic. You can see the cat-like aspects in the head, tail, and legs, but it's also very humanoid. It's bipedal and has outstretched arms, distinct fingers, and a human-like chest. I'd say it's very close to 50-50 cat/human.

Now let's compare that with Arceus. What the hell is this abomination? It looks like a giraffe power ranger. I mean, if you like the design, to each their own.

I agree that newer pokemon are often too anthropomorphic, but it seems to me that they can also be too abstract. Artists appear to have trouble just drawing... creatures.

mantism · 120 points · Posted at 10:42:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

giraffe power ranger

lmao

Though to be fair, the focus on Gen 4 legendaries are different than those of Gen 1. Gen 4 is mostly about mythology, and a literally god-like pokemon fits pretty well with a design of a horse, with a mostly enigmatic feel. But Dialga and Palkia does pale in comparison to Giratina.

Vexacion · 31 points · Posted at 11:21:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the ones that start out humanoid are fine. Mewtwo clearly takes Mew as it's design base. I think the issue is with the evolutions that come out of no where. For example take Alakazam. Humanoid but you can clearly follow Abra->Kadabra->Alakazam. Fennekin's doesn't

On the otherhand I assume for the Fennekin example that it was inspired by the asian fox spirit(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_spirit). Generally 'fox spirit' monsters in stories and games can take human form and tend to have fire and charm abilities. ...I don't get the stick but I assume it was a 'personal touch' to give it a bit of a different character to the stand fox spirit monster

throwdownhardstyle · 4 points · Posted at 11:41:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But they already did the Kitsune thing with Vulpix/Ninetales in Gen 1.

RQK1996 · 4 points · Posted at 14:46:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

and Zorua and Zoruak

metalflygon08 · 2 points · Posted at 19:35:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And Kadabra

Noveira · 1 points · Posted at 16:06:07 on August 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

The stick is because that line is designed more as a witch/magician aspect. In some games delphox (or braixen?) uses the stick to cast fire. I think there might be some broomstick connotations too.

Cypherex · 65 points · Posted at 10:42:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, if your task is to draw the GOD of all Pokemon there's no way you're gonna come up with the perfect design. It could take an entire committee of a thousand people a decade to come up with something and it still wouldn't please everyone.

Prof_Acorn · 8 points · Posted at 19:49:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now that you mention it Arceus looks precisely like a creature designed by a committee.

dlawnro · 12 points · Posted at 11:35:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, my biggest issue with the newest gens is that a lot of the pokemon are just super overdesigned. In the first gen, pokemon started out simple, and more powerful evolutions or legendaries were still pretty simple, just bigger or more fierce looking. In newer gens, they replaced that trend with just cramming more and more design elements into evolutions and legendaries, and to me, that just makes them look super busy.

Jwalla83 · 12 points · Posted at 14:39:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, this is exactly what I try to explain when people say preferring Gen 1 aesthetically is just nostalgia. So many new Pokemon designs are just, as you said, busy.

I mean let's compare Muk and Garbodor, because Muk is often used as a "counterexample" to Gen 1 being designed well ("Literal pile of purple goo!"). Yes, Muk is a pile of toxic waste, and Garbodor is a pile of garbage (?), those design themes aren't inherently bad. But look at how they're executed: Muk is 2 shades of purple in a ripple pattern, with one huge arm and a big mouth. He's straightforward, simple, and cohesive.

Garbodor has: a brownish amorphous body, green moss (?) head with neck dangles and a jagged line dividing the middle of his face, two puffy ear things, one arm that's an extension of his brown body material with pipes sticking out as fingers, another arm made of chunks of his body material connected by a toilet paper roll that also sticks out the end as a finger (?), and then he has blobs of pink and blue stuck all over his body (representing garbage I guess?).

Nothing about his design is simple or cohesive. There's so much going on.

ActivateGuacamole · 7 points · Posted at 18:19:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Garbodor has: a brownish amorphous body, green moss (?) head with neck dangles and a jagged line dividing the middle of his face, two puffy ear things, one arm that's an extension of his brown body material with pipes sticking out as fingers, another arm made of chunks of his body material connected by a toilet paper roll that also sticks out the end as a finger (?), and then he has blobs of pink and blue stuck all over his body (representing garbage I guess?). Nothing about his design is simple or cohesive. There's so much going on.

Garbodor is just a garbage bag that exploded because it was filled too much. It's a very strong design IMO and not at all cluttered. It's asymmetrical and dirty because it's got clumps of garbage in it.

BeholdTheHair · 2 points · Posted at 18:50:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's funny; I've always maintained part of the problem with the newer designs is they're too simple. My point of contention is with the overall design; most earlier 'mons, especially first gen, were all sharp lines and angular features on creatures that are a fair approximation of animal morphology. By contrast, an awful lot of the newer 'mons are little more than basic shapes piled atop one another, and most of those shapes are simply some variation of "round." Many of them don't even look like complex organisms, let alone advanced animal life.

Thinking on it further, though, I think we're both right. The earlier designs were simpler in that they generally stuck to a particular theme and didn't have a lot of unnecessary cruft stuck onto them. That also made them more compelling (IMO, natch), as the relatively few lines there were used to much greater effect.

Ditoeight · 3 points · Posted at 15:09:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Garbodor is a polarizing pokemon even for fans of the games, and is kind of an easy target. Id like to know your thoughts on some of the new pokemon like yungoos or lycanroc

Jwalla83 · 5 points · Posted at 15:29:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really only chose him for the Muk comparison, because both are similar thematically but pretty different in execution.

I think Yungoos is mostly fine and relatively simple (though I'm not a fan of his evolution). For Lycanroc, the non-werewolf form is fine; it feels a little busy in the mane area (he already has facial hair tufts, and then a bigger tuft of white hair for his mane, and then weird black spikes of hair [?] within the mane) -- see Arcanine for a better execution of a puffy mane, in my opinion. Not digging the werewolf form though; looks like a character from a Sonic game and his mane is confusing visually

Ditoeight · 1 points · Posted at 15:31:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So it sounds like you universally believe that simple is better?

Jwalla83 · 4 points · Posted at 15:37:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not necessarily simple, but cohesive. Arcanine isn't a particularly simple design but overall it feels like his design meshes and flows. I think I prefer when the designs choose one or two physical features to emphasize, and then have a relatively supplemental base for the rest of the body; lots of the newer designs feel like they have to tack on extra spikes/angles/shapes to make it interesting - but that just feels overdesigned to me.

It's like the line between Digimon and Pokemon, where the more evolved Digimon just get extra spikes/armor/geometric pieces thrown in for complexity's sake.

Ditoeight · 2 points · Posted at 15:55:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So when I asked about lycanroc i was pretty surprised you went with the arcanine comparison, I was expecting a jolteon comparison given their more similar qualities. Both very spiky, but lycanroc has 3 colors instead of 2.

Something new I want to bring up is the medium in which most of these pokemon are seen, which is in game.

here you can see what jolteons 3d model looks like, and here is lycanroc. It may be just me, but jolteon looks kinda like a yellow blob just because it's basically one color, where as lycanroc looks a lot more defined.

Personally, while I feel like some of the more simple designs may look better for their box art, the newer designs look significantly better in game. And i think that is one of the major contributing factors to pokemon design, since obviously what it looks like in game is going to be the main focus.

Also heres arcanine to really drive my point about blobbiness. Arcanine's 2d art is very majestic and sharp, but the 3d model just has this yellow blob.

TheHeadlessOne · 10 points · Posted at 12:54:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Im not sure how well Mewtwo would be received if he was released today

Back then his humanoid body combined with both the in game more and out of game legends regarding mew made him feel powerful advanced and evolved. He earned the "ultimate life form" title.

I think legendaries have always been special, which is what makes them legendary. But you can see a general trend through DPPt of becoming less distinct and more detailed, and it's that combination, details for details sake, that makes them feel less pokemony IMO.

Like Ho-oh and Lugia look like birds. Lucia's a bit odd and has giant hands, really more of a scaleless dragon of some kind, but they have a distinctive powerful but reasonable quality.

Ruby and Sapphire took it a step forward. They broke from a more organic shape, favored extreme markings that have them an angular and almost robotic quality to Groudon and Kyogre. They were still mostly monsters, but they were very distinctive from the rest of the world.

Diamond and Pearl took this to extremes, where the legendaries are cluttered with random appendages and fixtures to the point where you can't concieve how most of them could move. They still seem powerful, but it's not clear why anymore.

It's one of the reasons I loved Black and White's mascot dragons- they were large, single colored, simple dragons with fancy tails. While I'd prefer reshiram have more arm structure and zekrom to have less bulky if a snout, they still were very much creatures first. Kyruem and the djinns however... Less my cup of tea.

TwilightVulpine · 7 points · Posted at 13:11:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The humanoid trend doesn't bother me at all, but to be a devil advocate, Mewtwo is more humanoid because he is artificially-created, genetically-engineered by humans.

nandaparbeats · 6 points · Posted at 15:32:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I want to believe I'm being unbiased when I say this: Mewtwo is purposefully the exception to the "rule." He's humanoid in a generation of monster-like Pokemon because he's a "freak" and isn't actually supposed to exist. Alternatively, you might disagree because Mew, who is completely natural and is supposed to exist, looks more humanoid than animalistic, just like Mewtwo. In that case, I think their humanoid quality stems from their mysterious origins. The weirdness of their humanoid designs--especially Mewtwo--contributes to the exotic vibe they give off.

Even without knowing why, we just know Mew and Mewtwo are different and therefore dangerous or powerful because of it. Every Legendary Pokemon (and to a lesser extent, the first dragon-type Pokemon, the Dratini line) in Gen 1 gives off that vibe; the three birds do it through the surroundings in which you find them (mysterious cave; abandoned power plant; and, weirdly enough, Victory Road, the most dangerous area in the game aside from Mewtwo's cave), and Mew and Mewtwo do it through the hype surrounding them, as well as through their designs. The hype and the designs work together to create a strange feeling. Throughout the game you hear of these extremely rare and powerful Pokemon. You finally find one of them in the hardest area of the game at level 70, which, as a kid, is mind-blowlingly scary. He makes a cry you've never heard, and to make things even more terrifying, he's a goddamn psychic Pokemon, which, in Gen 1, are all but invincible. His design drives everything home: Mewtwo is completely unlike every powerful Pokemon you've ever seen. He's not like Dragonite or Gyarados or even the legendary birds; he's just this humanoid cat... thing. But then he completely obliterates your team if you' underestimate him, and he just won't get in that fucking Ultra Ball. He's just so freaky. What the fuck is he?

Imagine being a kid again without having read a walkthrough or having seen the first movie; I'd be freaked out. I think the designers were, on some level, conscious of the way Mewtwo's design makes us "other" him, and while I'm absolutely over-analyzing it, I think it's amazingly well done. No other Legendary Pokemon (save Deoxys) has managed to do what Mewtwo does in terms of design.

OriJuice · 4 points · Posted at 13:30:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mewtwo is super interesting from a design perspective because he spoke. Think about it, what one they Pokémon spoke? Meowth. What are the similarities? They're both bipedal and emotive. (Facial expressions, etc.) those were purposeful designs to allow the audience to connect with those particular characters differently than with say, Pikachu. They had impact because they were purposefully designed to be different from the ground up. Whereas anthropomorphic Pokemon now are no different from their 4 legged electric mouse counterpart. All they can do is say their name.

Kyoopy11 · 2 points · Posted at 13:24:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't know why you assume not designing their characters in a way you don't like is somehow a failure on their part. I would be willing to be that they just have a different taste than you do, and they succeeded by the definitions of what they desired.

psychosocial-- · 57 points · Posted at 09:51:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Part of it, I think, is that back in the day, "cute" Pokémon weren't as strong. If you were into competing with your friends, it's honestly just stupid not to evolve your Charmander, for example. Sure, it retains its cuteness, but it just won't be nearly as strong as a Charizard.

Now, with the inclusion of fairy type, which is new and still pretty OP, there are Pokémon that are both cute and strong as hell. Like Mimikyu. I love my Mimikyu and the fairy types in general. They're "girly" and "cute", but deceptively powerful. That tickles my fancy as a person who likes psychological warfare.

Darcsen · 77 points · Posted at 10:05:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

From the first two gens, I'd consider plenty of the strong pokemon "cute". Dragonite is big and soft with gentle features, Ampharos, Blissey, Espeon is a decent sweeper, Miltank was a monster sometimes, that's just off the top of my head.

*Mew and Celebi, forgot those two cuties.

**Bellossom!!!

[deleted] · 40 points · Posted at 10:23:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

um excuse you scyther is obviously the cutest.

Darcsen · 20 points · Posted at 10:44:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Apart from Espeon, who is the cutest best Pokemon ever, the cutest pokemon goes to Muk, you swine. You hug Muk, you leave an imprint, like hugging a pile of silly puddy. Scyther is adorable, but it's no Muk.

darthluigi36 · 6 points · Posted at 12:03:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree with Mum. Also, Koffing. He's just a happy ball of fun.

SkorpioSound · 9 points · Posted at 13:42:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Freudian slip?

darthluigi36 · 2 points · Posted at 19:41:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn autocorrect, lol. Oh well, my mum is kind of a muk anyway.

bantha_poodoo · 4 points · Posted at 12:32:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I hated that Scyther and Kabutops were chronically underutilized Pokèmon. They seemed like they'd easily be up there with the most powerful but their stats never seemed as powerful as others, nor did they make a lot of appearances in the anime.

Revverb · 3 points · Posted at 13:30:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

These are the two I loved to use, too, I still have mine from my first play through of FireRed/LeafGreen. Sickle-arm bros forever!

ClimbOnGoodBuddy · 1 points · Posted at 15:30:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Bellosom is garbage. Dragonite wasn't great until gen 3, and even then he was meh.

crystaltorta · 32 points · Posted at 10:04:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mew tho

itstingsandithurts · 64 points · Posted at 10:08:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kind of prime example of why Mew was so memorable/exciting to get.

It was odd that such a cute thing was so powerful, so it drew a lot of attention. Now if everything is cute and powerful, you don't get these stand out pokemon anymore.

Ditoeight · 1 points · Posted at 15:17:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mew was exciting to get because it was the first mythical and completely unavailable to most kids for a really really long time. It was so rare that myths about how to acquire it spread all around the world. You probably heard about that truck in vermillion. Reducing it down to "its because he was strong but cute" is pretty dishonest and ignoring a lot of major factors in mews popularity.

SoftuOppai · 1 points · Posted at 12:20:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Username checks out.

someotherdudethanyou · 6 points · Posted at 10:11:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This was my issue with the Gen 3 starters. I felt evolved Pokemon were starting to look more like Transformers due to the anthropomorphication.

BoogieTheHedgehog · 9 points · Posted at 11:06:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My Torchic began as a cute fire chicken and turned into a crazy fully grown birdperson. I was quite surprised given that usually previous evolutions meant growing a bit bigger and getting some extra details (bigger flowers, wings etc).

Generally in the early gens if you caught something that looked like a bird, it stayed a bird. There were exceptions of course, eggs turning into trees and Psyduck turning weirdly humanoid. Of course the old Magicarp fish into angry motherfucking eel dragon thing, but that was intentionally jarring.

CptnFabulous420 · 13 points · Posted at 10:40:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought Swampert struck a nice balance between humanoid and animal. The hunched over stance and its features made it still look like something you'd see crawling around a swamp, like an amphibious gorilla. Blaziken, on the other hand, does look pretty dumb, and I wish I picked Mudkip instead.

RealBlazeStorm · 39 points · Posted at 09:41:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Players usuallty want to have the 'cool' looking pokémon and the general consensus is that the monster ones look cooler than the humanoid ones. But it was an interesting read

-Swade- · 50 points · Posted at 09:58:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I am always​ torn between cute designs and monster designs.

I love Nidoking because he looks like he'd honestly fuck you up. But Emolga, Piplup, Squirtle are cute as hell. I think the newer gens are often pretty successful in the cute department.

But a design like Gardevoir just falls completely flat for me. It's a ballerina lady + ...I honestly have no idea. I'd say a flower? But it's not a grass type. Flowers are a fairy motif kinda now... except fairy wasn't a thing at that point.

Like I barely know what it is, much less what type it would be. And my favorite visual categories in Pokemon are "monster" and "cute" and I don't feel like it's anywhere near those zones. I know people love that Pokemon actually but I assume they prefer anthropomorphic designs (which is a legitimate opinion).

DiamondTiaraIsBest · 40 points · Posted at 10:11:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What, if you've been on the internet for this long then you should know that Gardevoir is regarded as one of the cutest pokemon.

[deleted] · 80 points · Posted at 10:18:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I would advise against going this road.

R3belZebra · 11 points · Posted at 10:41:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have things i want to share with you

Zantre · 7 points · Posted at 11:13:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, you should really avoid seeing how deep the Lopunny hole goes.

PRDX4 · 8 points · Posted at 12:40:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lopunny hole

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Forgive_my_Ignorance · 4 points · Posted at 10:31:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

/u/dabuthegreat has seen some serious shit.

ThanosDidNothinWrong · 2 points · Posted at 10:37:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

your username suggests you have questionable taste in cartoon character rankings

DiamondTiaraIsBest · 2 points · Posted at 10:46:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But she's so adorably evil!

ThanosDidNothinWrong · 1 points · Posted at 10:58:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

even she knows she's the worst
that's why she always wished she could be somepony else

suspiciousdave · 4 points · Posted at 10:36:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was just talking above about how I thought Gardevoir fell quite nicely between monster and humanoid. It's a psychic type so the look sort of worked.. I see what you mean about it looking as if it should be a grass type.

I'm pretty sure they've made it fairy type now in the layer gens.

It's interesting how some designs. work for some people and others don't!

ParryDotter · 1 points · Posted at 11:13:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Interesting that you brought up the pokemon that arguably has the most rule 34 in the franchise...

On topic, I kinda see what you mean. I was torn between Nidoking and Nidoqueen myself. One looked like a complete badass and the other was more 'cool' as a design.

EvagriaTheDamaged · 2 points · Posted at 11:06:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I... always went for the cuter pokemon. Charizard? Step aside, here comes togekiss.

[deleted] · 53 points · Posted at 10:15:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That and they had designs that while looking simple, like Voltorb into Electrode and Magnemite into Magneton, were designed to give you a picture of what they were without needing to say, "look, the sentient pokeball that absorbs energy has become dangerously large! It's probably going to explode from too much stored energy!". Also, the magneton is actually three magnemites that got stuck in an unbreakable triangular pattern, because they're obviously man-made and incapable of actually evolving into another organism. So, expect some screech, that metal is going to be grinding up against itself, and so on.

The new ones are like, "eh, it's two scoops of ice cream, then its three scoops, more scoops is better, who cares why it exists"

FishbowlSouls · 52 points · Posted at 11:15:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

mmm no offense but kind of shaky point you made about Voltorb. I doubt anyone, knowing nothing about pokemon beforehand besides the basics, would guess that the pokeball pokemon is secretly a bomb

manidaw · 2 points · Posted at 12:22:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You will when that sum bitch uses explosion on you right when you're about to catch it with your last pokemon with low health.

I used to be a garbage trainer.

Meritania · 5 points · Posted at 12:58:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I do think the designs of voltorb and electrode were a purposeful sprite joke for the fact they looked exactly like items on the map, and thus became traps for the power plant.

Darcsen · 2 points · Posted at 14:51:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They were mimics. Every good JRPG has to have some sort of mimics.

Tfish · 2 points · Posted at 16:31:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Magnemite isn't a man made Pokemon.

Houdiniman111 · 1 points · Posted at 12:36:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Huh. That makes a lot of sense for magnemites.

semperscio · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It makes sense for Magnemite to Magneton, but I'd reckon it doesn't hold up as well for Magneton to Magnezone.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 10:22:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

-Swade- · 15 points · Posted at 10:29:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And that's really my point. If you explain beforehand why you like or dislike things using an at least somewhat objective metric (that you take time to explain) then these conversations can be so much more fruitful.

Because I like a lot of new gen Pokemon too. And the old gens had some real whiffs in there in my opinion. I think they are still doing 'cute' fairly well so a lot of beginning evolutionary stages don't feel as out of place. It's the later stuff (Torrcat) that is weird because I think of Pokemon as pets.

I want a cat as a pet. I want a dinosaur as a pet. I don't so much want a pantsless furry wrestler man-cat as a pet.

Zediac · 7 points · Posted at 12:00:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also, older ones were things that were pretty much already in existence and just made a little more monster-y. A pigeon that now fights. A turtle that now fights. There were some odd things and some things that were straight mythology but they mostly had a feel of being things that might exist right now. Nature has a way of form following function.

Newer ones are much more abstract. It's not that the new ones aren't based on actual things. It's that the finished products are stepping away from the "could exist right now" thing. It seems as if they're running out of original ideas so to compensate for that they're adding on a bunch of questionable spines, spikes, stripes, angles, etc in order to try to make them visually distinct and interesting.

The older gen Pokemon had more of an air of "simple elegance" while the newer ones feel like "complicated for the sake of being complicated".

Here's a few examples of what I mean.

Charizard vs Emboar

Aerodactyl vs Archeops (both are rock/flying)

Dragonite vs Hydreigon

Blastoise vs Greninja

Mew vs Hoopa

The newer Pokemon look much more abstract than the older ones and are far more "busy" with their design. The design style, or even design philosophy, has heavily changed since the start.

That's why people say that the new stuff doesn't feel like Pokemon. It's because they've moved so far away from the original design style that someone who isn't familiar with would probably think that Mew and Hoopa are from two different games.

TheHeadlessOne · 7 points · Posted at 12:57:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Archaeops is a straight up dinosaur. He looks absurd in 3D, but he looks closer to nature without added spikes and angles and spines and features than Aerodactyl is by a mile.

SaidOdysseus · 3 points · Posted at 10:11:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In support of this theory, it looks like there was a shift in Pokemon X & Y where the final evolution of all the starters was bipedal, person shaped, and wearing "clothes".

http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Starter_Pok%C3%A9mon#Kalos

JurazzyCo · 2 points · Posted at 10:58:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think that's because X & Y and Sun & Moon starters are designed to look like medieval-fantasyesque characters(or whatever you want to call them). Greninja - a ninja Delphox- a mage Chesnaught - a knight Inceniroar - a fighter Primarina - a bard Decidueye - a rogue

Wariosmustache · 3 points · Posted at 14:54:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a good way to structure a conversation about art, btw.

I'm probably too late to the party for anyone to read this, but if I could add my two cents to the conversation:

Something that should be kept in mind when looking at old vs new is also changes in the art industry.

Yes, the original Pokemon art has that nice watercolor design which I'm personally a big fan of, but another big thing was it was all hand drawn.

Since then, and we've seen this with a lot of the video game artists that have made the switch, the colors and shapes have changed largely with the advent of computer drawing. There's a clear difference in art style between artists who make their characters with pen and paper and those with a tablet and photoshop. Pokemon's changes parallel that of, say, Street Fighter V in this regard. The primary artist's means of doing art has changed, and they've picked up new habits to go with it.

Lastly we have the most recent Generation of Pokemon; something that a lot of people seemed to agree with was how surprised they were seeing how good some of the new pokemon, who they originally didn't like from their concept art, looked in the game proper. Pokemon aren't necessarily being made in portrait anymore, but with a priority of how it will look / move when made into a 3D computer model.

superawesomepandacat · 6 points · Posted at 09:55:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Delphox tho ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

dragon-storyteller · 25 points · Posted at 09:59:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gender ratio: 87.5% male

You might be in for a surprise, dude

superawesomepandacat · 1 points · Posted at 13:06:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good odds, I'll take it.

-Swade- · 11 points · Posted at 10:04:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like this is a primary reason people like Gardevoir. Which is a primary reason why I wish it was a different design.

joey_fatass · 4 points · Posted at 10:36:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Right? Keep the creepy furry bullshit outta my Pokémon

PaperAngel · 1 points · Posted at 10:27:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gardevoirs Japanese name is literally SIRKNIGHT it was fucking intended to be a male.

-Swade- · 1 points · Posted at 10:32:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Really? Is there a cultural reason for the design that I don't know about? Because to me I think it very clearly is wearing a dress or has features in an intentionally dress-like shape.

Were they going for more of an armor shape and nobody recognized it?

PhalanxLord · 2 points · Posted at 10:53:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, considering how LordKnightmon (Crusadermon in English) looks I think Japan has some very odd ideas about knights.

PaperAngel · 1 points · Posted at 12:40:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i have no idea, bulbapedia says something about its name origin it seems it doesnt have to do anything with the dress or something

dragon-storyteller · 2 points · Posted at 09:57:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The "agressive" observation is on point. Even humanoid old-pokemon that weren't weak, like Totodile's evolutions, look at least somewhat menacing (and it is interesting to note that since their introduction, they too have been made to look a bit more 'soft')

welcometomoonside · 2 points · Posted at 10:06:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This might be why I adore quadruped starters so much. #teamsamurott

oiimn · 2 points · Posted at 10:11:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

talking about a fire pokemon right then and then you talk about an elegant creature and you dont put Ninetales, im so disapointed

FlyingWeagle · 2 points · Posted at 10:51:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

tl;dr new pokemon is digimon

DirtyDan257 · 2 points · Posted at 11:40:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree that the humanoid Pokemon tend to look worse but I don't think the new gens have a greater amount of these than gen 1. Just looking at gen 7 I can only think of Pheromosa and Tsareena and then a bit more of a stretch is Incineroar, Decidueye, and the Tapus. Gen 1 alone had the Machamp line, Hitmonchan, Hitmonlee, Jynx, and Mr. Mime. I don't really think they're any more prevalent now than they've ever been. Here's the human like egg group). Some of the ones in there are still based on animals but are bipedal and have human like attributes.

TheNorthComesWithMe · 2 points · Posted at 12:51:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Everyone can say whether or not they like something. Not everyone can understand or express why they don't like something. That's why we have critics.

HumanAtlas · 2 points · Posted at 15:24:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

However, another interesting design trend is also how many "inspirations" are behind the Pokemon. Many of the Gen 1 Pokemon are, as you said, monster-fied versions of an animal, object, or concept. For example, Charizard is a dragon. Nidoking is a porcupine-rhino monster.

In the newer games, it seems most Pokemon have more elements to their design, usually a minimum of two. They are things that make the Pokemon "clever". For example, we have Primarina, who is a seal-Mermaid-Singer-Silky. The base idea is a Seal combined with the "theme" of an entertainer. So they connected those two by referencing silkies (women who turn into seals) and Mermaids. For an example of a newer Pokemon who is just one thing, we have Pyukumuku. It's design adds some bunny-like characteristics to it, but it's essentially a Pokemon-afied sea cucumber. What's interesting about it is that the unique characteristics of a cucumber are incorporated into the very mechanics of the Pokemon. A Pokemon from Gen 1, like Kingler, could get away with just being the animal it is, without too much research into that animal, but it seems newer Pokemon need to have a hook that makes them unique.

Quekie · 2 points · Posted at 10:02:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rise of the Furries.

Unidangoofed · 3 points · Posted at 10:49:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man, these planet of the ape sequels are getting worse and worse.

Quekie · 1 points · Posted at 13:22:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, they forgot their roots and kept branching out to other animals besides apes

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 10:23:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think I agree with you.

Two designs that kinda straddled the line a bit between monster and humanoid, to me, we're Blaziken and Gardevoir. Humanoid but definitely not human. Blaziken is a fighting type so it is how it should be but is very spiky, tough looking. Gardevoir had the elegance you were talking about on the other hand but was also psychic type so humanoid still worked.

One other design that definitely did not work was the last evolution of Litten.

I don't know his name because I never cared to learn it. The cat is damn ugly :( I know most people wanted an awesome lion or a fire cat at the end.

Instead we got a weird man cat thing. I'm sure some people liked it and I'm happy for them because my hate of it is so absolute I almost feel bad.

sparky662 · 4 points · Posted at 10:33:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really don't like Incineroar, I think it crossed the line into looking too human like. I think it's the 'muscle man' body proportions and more human like hands and feet that ruin it.

On the other hand I really like some of the more anthropomorphic designs, such as Delphox, Lucario and Zoroark. But to me their body proportions and features still look animal like. They look like an animal on two legs, not some weird animal-human mash up like Incineroar does.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 10:45:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lucario was cool! And Zoroark. I think Delphox was borderline for me but you're totally right. I wish the would go back to the more animal designs. Standing on two legs is fine.

But I want to feel like I have pet animals, basically. Gen 8 will be us keeping actual people in pokeballs with cute hats on. It will be called Pokemon Modern-Day Slavery.

SEC-DED · -2 points · Posted at 11:48:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm sorry, have you seen machoke? It's literally a man looking Pokemon

sparky662 · 3 points · Posted at 12:20:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Machoke's design kind of works though as it doesn't turn from a kitten to a man-cat thing. The style is more consistent. Besides, I was giving my opinion of Incineroar, I can't see what Machoke has to do with it. For what it matters I still dislike Machoke, but not as much as Incineroar.

JurazzyCo · 1 points · Posted at 10:46:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hate to be that guy, but Fennekin evolves into a fox-lady wearing a dress.

cosmicblob · 1 points · Posted at 10:58:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it possible that they have been shifting towards creatures with more gender neutral appeal amongst children?

Hitokage77 · 1 points · Posted at 11:03:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe this is because through the years...humanity has become the most intimidating monster on the block

Manifest82 · 1 points · Posted at 11:04:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed. Too many starters end up being humanoids even when it makes no sense.

Vadoff · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Basically Pokemon became Digimon.

Dragovic · 1 points · Posted at 12:48:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really. Digimon designs tend to take the definition of evolution more seriously. They start as monsters and animals that are sometimes cute then with each step evolve into more aggressive looking humanoid things. Newer Pokemon designs tend to evolve into bigger versions of themselves. The humanoid things tend to start out as humanoid before becoming more humanoid.

fullforce098 · 1 points · Posted at 11:27:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Crap, I hadn't really noticed this before and now I'm never gonna be able to unsee it. You're absolutely right. There were always the Machoke-esc Pokémon that were monsters/animals even though they were humanoid and wore clothes, but that was mostly contained in the Fighting types. Now it's becoming common in every type.

GarrettSucks · 1 points · Posted at 11:42:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dadgum this thread is interesting!

Dejected-Angel · 1 points · Posted at 11:51:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pants? Isn't that a skirt?

nerak33 · 1 points · Posted at 12:08:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What are examples of good designs from Gen I that don't strictly fallow this rule of yours?

Mewtwo, which is anthropomorfic - but "mad looking", a little unsettling, therefore not "cute" either.

Aaaand: Raichu. A fine design, which is a more sophisticated cute than Pikachu, and but still not going into the kaiju sphere.

See what they were going for with Gen II foward? They told the designers to go for more pikachus. For obvious comercial reasons.

TheMaStif · 1 points · Posted at 12:25:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

exactly that!

The 'monster' qualities of pokemon, and their resemblance to real animals like birds, mice, horses, etc. and some from our imagination like dragons, unicorns, and fire-birds; were replaced by 'bubbly' and soft-edged creatures that don't quite resemble anything real, and are far too 'cartoonized' to be taken seriously (or as serious as you can take Pokémon)

Houdiniman111 · 1 points · Posted at 12:27:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very well put. Thank you for eloquently putting this into words.

Sneaky_Hobbit · 1 points · Posted at 12:32:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The humanoid ones always have been my least favourite of the pokemon.

erickgramajo · 1 points · Posted at 12:33:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, thanks, very good explanation!

my_phones_account · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Digimon did this from the get go.

TempusCavus · 1 points · Posted at 12:45:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think one of the main differences is that most of the old pokemon were more simple in design. there was a trend of increasing complexity from the third to the fifth generation (2nd gne was mostly rejected 1st gen designs.) I think one reason that the 6th gen saw a resurgence in older players is because the designs became more simplistic again.

karcholas · 1 points · Posted at 12:46:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I typically prefer the monster over the anthropomorphic style, but man if the pro wrestler fire cat from Sun/Moon isn't the best thing ever.

CliffyWeevil · 1 points · Posted at 13:09:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So that's why they all feel so similar...

maclincheese · 1 points · Posted at 13:17:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Silvally comes to mind as a well designed Pokémon. Monsterous, cool, maybe a little elegant, and the lore backs up its amalgamation of parts.

Pentax25 · 1 points · Posted at 13:18:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Upvote 3000!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:25:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

One of the things I like most about the old pokemon is how easy it is to figure out what animal theyre based on, they often start as a normal animal, and become more "unnatural" as they evolve, whereas alot of new pokemons are just straight up weird. (A pokemon based on trash.... really?)

With older pokemons you could also almost always know, that if you liked its first form, you would most likely like its evolutions. Opposite is true with Fennekin, where its starting form is based on a fox, and then it becomes a humanoid girl thingy?

OriJuice · 1 points · Posted at 13:25:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's worth mentioning too that post Gen-1 there's a noticeable shift in design elements moving away from mythology, which drove a massive portion of the design of the original 151. Pokemon like Charizard, Dragonite, Nine Tails, Tentecruel, Gyrados and Gastly were all in some way based off mythological tales, stories or based off creatures in mythology. I remember when they introduced Pokemon based off keys and ice cream cones, that just about ruined Pokemon for me.

ramdiggidydass · 1 points · Posted at 13:26:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep. Original 151 FO LIFE

Arcosah · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The average person doesn't know much about art though. I don't know why it looks different, it just does. Anyone that can't agree that newer pokemon look different from older pokemon is just being a prude. And don't get me wrong, I love the in depth explanation you've offered and find it more meaningful. But there is nothing wrong with simply saying "I just don't like the new art style. They don't look like pokemon to me." It is perfectly valid in its own right. A lesser right than conversation like yours, certainly, but its own right nonetheless.

Rorako · 1 points · Posted at 13:29:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It just seems like they've lost their intensity over the years, and I think your comment captivates that. It also shows the differences between the generations of fans. My generation, growing up on the first two generations of Pokémon, liked the intensity with a sprinkle of cuteness here and there. Somewhere along the lines, the generations no longer liked that intensity had had to make Pokémon more relatable.

ambientLemon · 1 points · Posted at 13:49:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Newer Pokemon gens really divide them into categories based on players taste, and pokemon rarely hop out of that category when they evolve. Cute, elegant, spooky, monster, funny, etc. I think it's brilliant but if you were there for the monsters you're now getting like 3 good pokemon a gen

TheScarletCravat · 1 points · Posted at 14:25:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As a very, very casual Pokemon fan I've noticed that the designs have moved generally towards softer shapes and relies far more on miscellaneous blobs to provide detail.

msvivica · 1 points · Posted at 14:33:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I always thought the newer pokemon could as likely have been digimon instead, which made me dislike them, since originally you could see the difference. Your point about the anthropomorphic elements rings true in that context, since digimon included the humanoid evolution in the beginning already, unlike pokemon.

And OP's point about the eyes also holds true in this way; if the original eyes looked one way, then later became round, that certainly means they lost the distinctive pokemon look, making them much less distinctive in relation to digimon and whatever other mons happened later...

Rasta_Jack · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mr. Mine weaker design? Fuk u mean?

eqleriq · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The rectilinear look to the eyes were not only aggressive, they were used on passive and normal people as well

The entire art style changed to add more variety, since a lot of the eyes looked exactly the same just cut and paste onto different forms.

It wasn't just sharp edges, there were few characters in the world that didn't have white eyeballs with edges that had little or no color in them.

SFWY · 1 points · Posted at 14:46:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be more specific, "design" would be the more appropriate term instead of "art".

herptydurr · 1 points · Posted at 14:47:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Interestingly, when Fennekin evolves, she gains the triangle eyes. Same with Charizard, actually.

kibbles0515 · 1 points · Posted at 14:49:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also, we now have ice cream, chandeliers, candles, coffins, etc. Ya, Voltorb and Electrode looked like pokeballs, but it isn't like pokeballs are a real thing that we are familiar with.

hydro0033 · 1 points · Posted at 15:07:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I 100% agree with this. More kaiju please.

TheVibratingPants · 1 points · Posted at 15:27:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great write-up, and definitely a huge difference in the classic and new design philosophies. It's also worth noting that Pokémon's art style changes are in direct relation to the changes of general anime aesthetic.

Classic Pokémon art, including the humans and general design, were very much influenced by General 90s anime aesthetic. There's a bit more grit to them, more roughness, more inclusion of sharper edges, very expressive design. As anime changed, so did Pokemon's art, leading up to what we have now with more generally rounded, organic linework and feeling somewhat muted in comparison, with a bigger emphasis on cuteness (the eyes being a good indicator of this change).

Personally, I love general 90s anime aesthetic and would like to see them get back to that, along with the emphasis on creature attributes as you said. It really worked for the series and I'm not super on board with the current look. Everything is too clean now.

Edit: Take a look at Pikachu over the years. He started out looking more creature-esque, hunched posture, with a lot more angular lines and a fatter body. This is opposed to his more clearly defined, simple-shaped oval head, slightly rounded ears, and skinnier body with upright, anthropomorphic posture.

chemsed · 1 points · Posted at 15:29:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We can have the same conversation about Starcraft 2 vs Brood War and the old Resident Evil vs the new.

Verizer · 1 points · Posted at 15:30:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They should have the circular eyes on the cute first level pokemon. Then the eyes get more angular as they evolve.

logicbecauseyes · 1 points · Posted at 15:48:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ashe/Greninja..... Shudders...

WigginIII · 1 points · Posted at 16:53:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

tl;dr There are fewer 'monsters' and more 'humanoids' in the new art

My takeaway: Newer art looks less like monsters and more like My Little Pony.

Dameleon · 1 points · Posted at 17:05:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree

Nitro_Indigo · 1 points · Posted at 07:50:33 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've been thinking about this for a while, but didn't know a way to express it.

My favourite designs from Gen 1 are the more "monstrous" looking ones, where you can't tell what they're supposed to be at first glance. Take Rhydon, for example. It's a rhinocerous? A dinosaur? Made of rock?

While I grew up with Gen 4, I've recently began feeling annoyed about the soapboxing about how "Pokémon are our friends" in later generations.

Maybe it's just nostalgia for someone else's childhood...

These_nutsghady · 1 points · Posted at 10:36:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*when your English teacher makes you analyse a novel to draw themes that they think the author wanted us to learn, but in actual fact they were just telling a story

whitestethoscope · 0 points · Posted at 09:51:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL that Japanese Pokémon artists encourage slavery

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 10:52:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

Metaright · 6 points · Posted at 11:59:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Alternatively, we have the magnet, the pile of goo, a Pokeball, and literally eggs.

Hara-Kiri · 0 points · Posted at 11:47:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh god that fennekin thing is just awful. I feel there is a very clear difference in the skill of the designing of the pokemon, after the original lot it just looks like they ran out of any original ideas and they just look like something a highschool student would draw.

zdwolf · 2198 points · Posted at 04:44:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old Pokémon eyes were thuggin. New Pokémon eyes r softies

mistersnurb · 822 points · Posted at 05:31:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Was Gengar a blood or a crip do you think

thesilentpickle · 489 points · Posted at 06:05:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He was a Ballas.

platinumD20 · 140 points · Posted at 09:21:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Obviously he was a saints row Saint.

SmashPortal · 122 points · Posted at 10:38:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*Third Street Saint

PuckMeInTheBeard · 163 points · Posted at 06:43:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Crip for sure. No way he's throwing up the 'blood' sign with only 3 fingers per hand.

SunriseMahogany · 64 points · Posted at 07:02:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea, he's part of the grape street gang.

whitestethoscope · 28 points · Posted at 09:45:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My shiny Gengar was a grove street OG

sunkenOcean01 · 17 points · Posted at 10:18:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

All you had to do was haunt the damn train, Gengar!

SwoodPotatoChopper · 5 points · Posted at 14:44:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'll have 2 number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, 2 number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda

Unidangoofed · 2 points · Posted at 10:51:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grape street, home... At least it was before I fucked everything up.

Treyzania · 1 points · Posted at 19:38:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The jitterbug gang.

Spore2012 · 1 points · Posted at 09:59:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lol, It literally takes only 3 fingers on each hand to make the sign.

edit- 3 and 4, blod

yokelwombat · 21 points · Posted at 09:16:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pfff, Gengar was obviously a Latin King.

zdhusn · 6 points · Posted at 09:35:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He was a Banana Boy.

APerfectCircle0 · 5 points · Posted at 12:05:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Viperking5 · 2 points · Posted at 09:39:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He was from Bompton.

SaintPoost · 1 points · Posted at 09:47:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

He's purple, so he's either a Brip or a Blood.

Guyomalo · 1 points · Posted at 11:25:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

girugumesh

Throwaway20180221 · 1 points · Posted at 12:51:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Banana Boys, obviously.

BermudaGuy · 1 points · Posted at 13:26:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

67k

Nickbeam21 · 1 points · Posted at 14:18:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

🅱️rip

diamama · 70 points · Posted at 09:09:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like the new ones are straight outta My Little Pony or similar.

ThanosDidNothinWrong · 11 points · Posted at 10:40:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

not enough eye sparkles
these pokemon have one sparkle per eye, cutesy ponies need at least two sparkles, three if it's a child character

BiffManly · 4 points · Posted at 13:59:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now listen here you li'l shit

Followed up by my cherry-picked new pokemon to make my argument uncounterable, cuz if I show you a picture of a new pokemon, that means they all have to look exactly like it, yeah?

diamama · 1 points · Posted at 14:27:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You say your argument is uncounterable, but I fail to see your argument in the first place.

BiffManly · 4 points · Posted at 15:44:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Probably needed to put a /s there

I was mostly mocking the fact that 50k people now believe that all 500 pokemon they don't remember from their childhood have giant googly eyes, because reddit can't be bothered to back up every single thing they read

Also Ponyta, because it is literally a pony

diamama · -2 points · Posted at 15:48:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There was only 150 around when I grew up, and those I remember fondly. Plus, the new eyes shown in this post looks like something I would more relate to something else, i.e. My Little Pony.

Nerull · 7 points · Posted at 21:01:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The original 3 starters all had big round cutesy eyes, which people would know if they were actually around for first gen.

Not to mention fucking Pikachu.

Spore2012 · 4 points · Posted at 09:59:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

even psyduck

Poppin__Fresh · 10 points · Posted at 10:29:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really, you could just as easily do the same thing but reversed.

Put a bunch of round-eyed gen one poke's next to a bunch of sharp-eyed newer ones.

Siretruck · 3 points · Posted at 13:41:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seriously. It's weird how everyone is ignoring that.

sdhu · 2 points · Posted at 12:56:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL: Original Pokemon had DBZ eyes

RQK1996 · 2 points · Posted at 14:48:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

yes like Bulbasuar against Toucannon

abraker95 · 1 points · Posted at 01:37:56 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kids back in the 20's vs us now. They looked like men back then. Now we are a bunch of softies even as young adults.

SpeedyVT · 1 points · Posted at 09:40:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those millennial snowflakes!

JK

[deleted] · 13 points · Posted at 09:47:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 10:41:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

aManOfTheNorth · -9 points · Posted at 09:15:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Think the world has had about enough of thugs

thr0be · 1427 points · Posted at 04:49:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So that's why all the new Pokémon look super un-intimidating

🎙️ IanMazgelis · 767 points · Posted at 04:53:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kanto-Hoenn definitely had a wild animal vibe I must admit. Even somewhat Sinnoh.

Fight_or_Flight_Club · 215 points · Posted at 07:17:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I kinda noticed after I beat Platinum that the games stopped feeling like Pokemon. SoulSilver (which came out after if I'm not mistaken) was a beautiful exception and I really wish 14 y/o me hadn't sold it

AraKnine · 164 points · Posted at 09:19:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Soulsilver and heartgold would have felt like the older games as they were updated versions of Silver and Gold which came out for the gameboy color after red/blue/yellow

OPmakesOC · 18 points · Posted at 14:32:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So THAT'S why FireRed feels like Red /s

SixteenthRiver06 · 68 points · Posted at 09:21:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed. The new games/designs are just too anime-y or something. Too cutesy I guess. Even the graphics are so bright and vividly colorful. Man...seems like forever ago that the fastest way to tell what pokemon game your friend was playing was by just glancing at the screen. If it was blue tinted, ya know...blue. red tinted....red. EDIT: since this is reddit, and everyone must argue about everything, let me explain that I understand you can look at the cartridge,etc etc. What I meant, was you could tell be glancing over someone's shoulder and be able to tell JUST FROM THE SCREEN. Jesus Christ.

Simon_CY · 24 points · Posted at 09:37:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I always did that trick that I can't remember how to do, but it let you modify the palette that a GB game on a GameBoy Color would load with. Played Red version with yellow and orange mixed in.

FormCore · 17 points · Posted at 09:53:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When booting a GB game you just hold pretty much any two buttons.

up+A

Right+Select

Select+A

All worked, youi just had to press it as "GAME BOY" was showing or something.

The wiki pages on this also go into some detail about how some games had some extra special palletes just for themselves (I think Metroid II was one that got a special pallete)

aujthomas · 7 points · Posted at 10:26:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Though two-button combinations did add extra palettes, there were also palettes that would activate simply by pressing one directional button. Here's a table I found, IIRC from my childhood, it sounds about right:


|Combo| |Background| |Sprite1| |Sprite2| ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Default Green/Blue Red Red Up Brown Brown Brown Up + A Red Green Blue Up + B Dk. Brown Brown Brown Left Blue Red Green Left + A Dk. Blue Red Brown Left + B Original Original Original Down R/B/Yellow R/B/Yellow R/B/Yellow Down + A Red/Yellow Red/Yellow Red/Yellow Down + B Yellow Blue Green Right Red/Green Red/Green Red/Green Right + A Green/Blue Red Red Right + B Negative Negative Negative

If one were to select a palette, the GAMEBOY logo immediately changes colors to reflect the selected palette. Also, if a palette has been selected, as long as a person were to re-select a different palette in the one-second-or-so before the logo fades away and the game actually begins, a person could keep cycling between multiple palettes and resetting the one-second-or-so delay (ultimately, the final palette selected is the one that will actually start with the game). I can recall a number of times as a kid where I would just sit on the toilet and cycle through palettes endlessly, having fun with the load screen and/or timing palette swaps to made up tunes in my head and basically not even playing the real game. Good times. Actually, it just occurred to me that I still have both my GBP and GBC, and one GBP game cartridge (Toy Story, lel), so in the name of Reddit, I guess I'm headed to the toilet

FormCore · 12 points · Posted at 10:57:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pick a readable table :)

_________________________________________________
|Combo|    |Background|    |Sprite1|    |Sprite2|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Default     Green/Blue      Red          Red 
Up          Brown           Brown        Brown 
Up + A      Red             Green        Blue 
Up + B      Dk. Brown       Brown        Brown 
Left        Blue            Red          Green 
Left + A    Dk. Blue        Red          Brown 
Left + B    Original        Original     Original 
Down        R/B/Yellow      R/B/Yellow   R/B/Yellow 
Down + A    Red/Yellow      Red/Yellow   Red/Yellow 
Down + B    Yellow          Blue         Green 
Right       Red/Green       Red/Green    Red/Green 
Right + A   Green/Blue      Red          Red 
Right + B   Negative        Negative     Negative 
Combo Background Sprite1 Sprite2
Default Green/Blue Red Red
Up Brown Brown Brown
Up + A Red Green Blue
Up + B Dk. Brown Brown Brown
Left Blue Red Green
Left + A Dk. Blue Red Brown
Left + B Original Original Original
Down R/B/Yellow R/B/Yellow R/B/Yellow
Down + A Red/Yellow Red/Yellow Red/Yellow
Down + B Yellow Blue Green
Right Red/Green Red/Green Red/Green
Right + A Green/Blue Red Red
Right + B Negative Negative Negative

:


|Combo|    |Background|    |Sprite1|    |Sprite2|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Default     Green/Blue      Red          Red 
Up          Brown           Brown        Brown 
Up + A      Red             Green        Blue 
Up + B      Dk. Brown       Brown        Brown 
Left        Blue            Red          Green 
Left + A    Dk. Blue        Red          Brown 
Left + B    Original        Original     Original 
Down        R/B/Yellow      R/B/Yellow   R/B/Yellow 
Down + A    Red/Yellow      Red/Yellow   Red/Yellow 
Down + B    Yellow          Blue         Green 
Right       Red/Green       Red/Green    Red/Green 
Right + A   Green/Blue      Red          Red 
Right + B   Negative        Negative     Negative 
suspiciousdave · 2 points · Posted at 10:49:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I forgot about this! My mind was blown when I first messed with the palette, lol

SixteenthRiver06 · 4 points · Posted at 09:42:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice! I never heard of that!

SlashXVI · 63 points · Posted at 09:30:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the fastest way to tell what pokemon game your friend was playing was by just glancing at the screen cartridge

FTFY

SixteenthRiver06 · -12 points · Posted at 09:42:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Deleted since reddit must argue about everything.

superdead · 8 points · Posted at 09:47:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or you, ya know, just look at the color of the cart.

jeffbarrington · 8 points · Posted at 10:22:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
SixteenthRiver06 · 0 points · Posted at 10:58:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was 12 when red/blue came out!

SlashXVI · 3 points · Posted at 10:28:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I am not sure if you are aware, but back then the cartridges were relatively big and you could physically see them plugged into the device. Since each edition's cartridge was the same color as the edition's name and all of them were different from the standard color (some cartridges), it was often very easy to tell that a pokemon game was sloted in the gameboy and even which specific one (like this).

SixteenthRiver06 · -9 points · Posted at 10:52:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No fucking shit??? wow it's like I didn't live during then or anything! Such research, much wow

Priff · 3 points · Posted at 09:58:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I dunno... my gameboy screen was mostly grey I think...

fancy kids with their fancy gameboy colour....

GlowingOrb · 1 points · Posted at 10:30:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mine was mostly green. Fancy kids with their fancy gameboy pocket

SmashPortal · 1 points · Posted at 10:40:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

On Gameboy Color all the towns were different colors.

Norkles · 1 points · Posted at 11:50:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL tinted monochromatic is way better than playing a game colored like it's supposed to be

SirSwir1 · 20 points · Posted at 09:30:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Platinum was the last best game out. Excluded Gold/Silver they were beautiful though. Black/White were ok and has some elements of the game we love but the new ones try to be 3D and look awful doing so. Hopefully they could release on a better system and change the gameplay completely.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 12:19:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Personally I think X/Y are tied with the originals and beat all other games, Sun/Moon are probably 2nd for me with Gold/Silver coming third. People always complain about the newer pokemon but I personally think they're getting better and better. Of course nothing beats the original

edit: having all day to think about this I think imma have to put gold/silver second. I was sleepy this morning.

Lemon_Tile · 3 points · Posted at 13:51:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon Black was the last one I played before trying Omega Ruby and I feel like there is a very jarring difference in the gameplay and difficulty. Playing Omega Ruby I felt like I really had to actively try to make the game harder for myself by trying to avoid new features.

One of the big things that I can't get used to is the Mega Evolutions. It honestly felt cheap to me that I could just crank up the power of my Pokemon at the drop of a hat, without even missing a turn. The only downside is that they have to hold a specific item, but that really doesn't make it much of a sacrifice. Also there is no reason to not Mega Evolve, so if you don't like the design of the Mega, tough.

Another big issue I had was that they just simply give you Latios! In the oringal Ruby/Sapphire, getting Latios/Latias was a lot of work and you really got the satisfaction of earning it. In the new one, they just give it to you so you have no reason to really care.

Also small things like poison not hurting you outside of battle really started to annoy me. I played Platinum and Black as a young adult, but they new ones finally just felt like a kids game to me. I don't mind the new designs for the most part but I just can't get onboard with the gameplay anymore.

tack50 · 2 points · Posted at 14:24:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also small things like poison not hurting you outside of battle really started to annoy me.

Yeah, I remember them going from "poison will eventually kill you" to "poison won't kill you but will leave you with 1HP". Now it doesn't even hurt outside battles? That's terrible

Lemon_Tile · 2 points · Posted at 14:31:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I was really disappointed when I discovered that. They've just made it way too easy. There is also a clear overabundance of items. When I played Omega Ruby I don't think I ever felt I was in danger of running out of potions/revives.

GeneralRane · 1 points · Posted at 14:17:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The mega evolution animation is a big down side for me. The only Pokémon I mega evolve regularly is Absol for its ability.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have no issue with the difficulty, it's an easy laid back game and it gets hard post game when you do wifi-battles. If you're into that then it's no issue. But if you're not I can see your concern. Tough enemies had mega evolutions which makes it a bit tougher. Latios I have no issue with though because he's a legendary and legendary pokemon are quite a minor point in the game to me, they're all looks, using them is boring, but of course that's my own personal opinion . They could give me every legendary at the beginning I would never touch one. Poison outside of battle has never bothered me regardless, everyone has antidotes so it was just an annoyance to begin with. It had no place in the game except right in the beginning. So overall I respect your opinions and on a person to person basis they're completely reasonable. I just think they're very minor or even irrelevant to the overall game. I don't mean to come off rude, but if you've never played Pokemon X/Y I strongly recommend giving them a try. They're really great games! Thank you for sharing your opinion :)

TheloniousPhunk · 0 points · Posted at 13:28:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are more than welcome to your opinion, but tbh the vast majority of people who have been playing since Gen 1 will disagree with you; myself included.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:38:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me and just about everyone I know have been playing since Gen 1. I think the majority would agree with me from what I've seen at gaming conventions, among friends and the internet. Of course their will always be people who believe Gen 1 is the best and it's been all down hill since (Gen 1 is undeniably the best game) but even my brother who is far older hasn't played since gen 1 for the very reason you're stating but has always been following and waiting to try again. He picked up X/Y at release and isn't trying to argue it's even better than the originals. I think that pokemon Red/Blue and X/Y are the fathers of the pokemon series. Absolutely brilliant games. If you haven't tried it you should definitely give it a shot sometime

Dr_Yay · 2 points · Posted at 12:00:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The games will most likely be on the Switch next

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:28:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy crap I did the exact same thing. Soul silver will always be my favorite

yuriydee · 1 points · Posted at 22:05:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me too i sold my DS and game back then and feel so stupid about it.

Error_402 · 0 points · Posted at 15:40:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you have a phone you should download Happy Chick. Haven't had any virus issues with it and you can download almost any Pokémon game! Super fun. Also built in Gameshark/Action Replay if you're into that too.

PatchTheLurker · 158 points · Posted at 07:41:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair this is heavily intended. The more we have fought alongside Pokemon, the more familiar and friendly they have become. Ash's Charizard couldn't stand taking orders from him pretty much until he squared off against Garry after the Elite 4. Pokemon weren't our friends, they were our partners. We didn't have to LIKE each other, we just needed to get by. Now, though, Pokemon are our best friends. We have spent countless hours training our Pokemon and trying to reach out to every different species. In the old days, getting my Fearow to like me was a challenge that I may or may not overcome, but damn if we don't dominate our battles. Now, just give me a couple candies and 30 minutes, me and my Ribombee are gonna be besties for the resties. Yeah we annihilate our foes but that's less important than the power of friendship.

[deleted] · 321 points · Posted at 08:11:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Didn't know that all it takes to create undying friendship is candy and slavery.

PatchTheLurker · 75 points · Posted at 08:30:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well that and face smooshes. Pokemon nowadays LOVE the face smooshes.

Tahmatoes · 5 points · Posted at 09:34:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And then there's Incineroar...

suspiciousdave · 3 points · Posted at 10:50:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We don't talk about Incineroar..

Kain222 · 2 points · Posted at 10:35:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The wink he does when you finish petting him is just....

Ew

Tahmatoes · 1 points · Posted at 10:53:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Papa Kitty will treat you right

Shugbug1986 · 0 points · Posted at 10:22:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And then there's Fire Emblem...

somethingoddgoingon · 18 points · Posted at 09:34:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it really slavery if you're getting candy?

ApocaRUFF · 45 points · Posted at 09:18:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You've never owned a dog, have you?

Grippler · 7 points · Posted at 09:28:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

you feed your dog candy!? you must love cleaning up vomit...

IsNotPolitburo · 11 points · Posted at 09:36:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Carob, man. All the deliciousness, none of the stuff that makes regular chocolate bad for them.

fundayz · 2 points · Posted at 09:31:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you think about it, domestication is really just species-wide stockholm syndrome. You either start pleasing your master or you die.

luigitheplumber · 2 points · Posted at 09:54:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wild dogs and cats exist. Some felines and canines underwent domestication to occur because it was favorable to them from an evolutionary standpoint.

fundayz · 1 points · Posted at 09:56:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Some felines and canines underwent domestication to occur because it was favorable to them from an evolutionary standpoint.

The ability to develop stockholm syndrome is favourable from an evolutionary standpoint, that was my point...

EmporioIvankov · 8 points · Posted at 10:26:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A lot of scientists believe dogs and cats domesticated themselves. That we didn't put them in cages until they were domesticated. Rather than us training or breeding their kindness, the ones that chose to get closer to us lived longer.

And a mutualistic evolutionary bond formed that benefitted both species: humans and hounds got more food the more they worked together, and humans and cats lived in cleaner environments when they lived together.

So from that perspective, it's not really Stockholm syndrome.

jimthewanderer · 2 points · Posted at 13:41:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

that was my point...

And your point is wrong. That's not stockholm syndrome.

Shasato · 0 points · Posted at 10:05:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

From an evolutionary standpoint, the wild animals that weren't domesticated either died in captivity or stayed wild animals. The animals that were domesticated were bred and the behavior reinforced in the offspring. Exactly what /u/fundayz said.

luigitheplumber · 1 points · Posted at 17:15:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

either died in captivity or stayed wild

as you and I both said, but the guy above said that it was a species-wide "obey or die", which is what I wanted to challenge.

gamerguyal · 1 points · Posted at 09:53:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not to mention genetic modification. Some breeds are super fucked up.

jimthewanderer · 1 points · Posted at 13:42:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's actually a very recent thing. Only the last 5 centuries at most.

jimthewanderer · 0 points · Posted at 13:40:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Firstly that's not how stockholm syndrome works. That's about as divorced from what its supposed to be and to still seem correct to the absolute layman.

Domestication isn't stockholm syndrome, it's just evolving with humans looking after you instead of being at the mercy of a seemingly random and capricious natural world. Humans are at least easier to read as either a benevolent eugenicist, or a sadistic prick.

How clever it was of sheep to acquire shepherds,

fundayz · 0 points · Posted at 14:19:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The point remains that the psychological basis for both stockholm syndrom and the evolution you describe is the same: learning to please those who control your welfare, even if it ultimately means a bad life.

it's just evolving with humans looking after you instead of being at the mercy of a seemingly random and capricious natural world.

Sorry but there are a lot of unsupported assumptions here. Sure, for some pets it might be better to be domesticated but for chickens, pigs and cows it's awful. A cow would live a much happier life in it's original wild conditions than in a factory farm. Plus, many pets have terrible owners who mistreat them.

Dynamex · 1 points · Posted at 09:58:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

touché

FondSteam39 · 16 points · Posted at 09:00:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Primatheratrix · 1 points · Posted at 09:26:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I read it as candles and 30 minutes on mobile. It took a completely different meaning.

Goldcobra · 1 points · Posted at 10:22:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Works with humans as well.

Source: Am a dad

Merosi · 12 points · Posted at 11:34:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We didn't have to LIKE each other, we just needed to get by. Now, though, Pokemon are our best friends

"pokemon, oh, you're my best friend, in a world we must defend"

i mean, i don't see how they could be any more clear that they were always meant to be best friends...

DGSmith2 · 7 points · Posted at 10:55:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm pretty sure that had nothing to do with why Charizard became more loyal. I thought it followed the games where you could not control a Pokemon that was too strong before having the right badges, Ash's Charizard obviously levelled very quickly compared to his other Pokemon so Ash didn't have control in the early series. Also in a later episode his Charizard gets very injured and Ash nurses it back from the brink and Charizard respects him (a little more) after that.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:00:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I completely forgot about charizard and ash.

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:49:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I always found Kanto too urban in designs

suspiciousdave · 0 points · Posted at 10:46:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hoenn will always be my favourite </3 the last of the truly wild looking games (and actual contests)

TheloniousPhunk · -1 points · Posted at 13:27:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The 2D games were fine. BW and BW2 started getting a little to anime-campy with the storyline but the designs still were cool for the most part.

The 3D games ruined Pokemon for me, I haven't been able to play them since XY. Game Freak embraced the anthro-anime style and just ran with it and while some really dug it, I just can't stand it.

Pokemon should have been left to the top-down, 2D style. The 3D worlds just don't cut it, not in the way they've been doing them.

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · 2 points · Posted at 14:41:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only reason you're saying that is because it took them forever to jump into 3D and you've grown accustomed to the unchanging style. And that's only because the handhelds weren't powerful enough to handle 3D. That's why the DS games use minimal amounts of 3D and almost everything is sprite based. With the release of the 3DS the jump was inevitable. Pokémon can finally be played in 3D without looking like trash.

TheloniousPhunk · -1 points · Posted at 17:30:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, I'm saying it because I don't like any of the 3D games because of the complete design change (aka the 3D)

Thanks for trying to tell me what I like though.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 21:07:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

TheloniousPhunk · 1 points · Posted at 21:12:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, I legitimately don't like the designs of the 3D games. It has nothing to do with what I'm used to.

What is it with people like you? You are aware that you do not get to choose what other people like n'or do you get to decide the reasons, right?

There have since been three 3D Pokemon games across two generations that I have given an honest try and I like none of them.

I love 3D Mario and Metroid games, and I go apeshit over 3D Zelda; while still maintaining my love for the 2D games - this did not change years ago when Nintendo made the transition for those franchises.

I don't like the 3D Pokemon games - I think they are way too cartoony and anime-styled, and the animation and overall model design is sub-par IMO

It has nothing to do with what I was used to.

What is so hard about this? Some people don't like them, stop trying to de-rationalize valid reasons just because you seemingly can't handle someone else not liking something you do.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 21:16:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

TheloniousPhunk · 1 points · Posted at 21:48:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit, do you have something wrong with you?

Cartoony is cool - the DS 2D games were still cartoony but I liked that style. I don't like the way it was implemented in 3D - I don't like the 3D models, the 3D game world is too bland, I don't like the Jaggies everywhere.

I am not opposed to 3D in Pokemon games - I thought the coliseum games were great. The 3D in these Pokemon games sucks in my opinion.

How can you possibly be arguing with something this subjective? What is going on in your brain?

Do you think I'm like, trying to lie about why I don't like them? I actually don't get how your mind is processing this argument.

You don't get to tell me what my reasons are dude - I know you reeeeally want to but you don't get to make that choice.

You have to be trolling me.

PM_ME_YOUR_SEX_FACE_ · 1 points · Posted at 22:41:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Would you prefer an HD POKÉMON GAME

the_shiny_guru · 1 points · Posted at 15:59:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree with the anthropomorphic part. Why did all three starters have to have heavy humanoid attributes? Not a single one of them is shaped like an actual beast/animal, which would have at least given people some variance if they didn't like humanoid pokemon...

oceano7 · 11 points · Posted at 11:14:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Consider the following.

Golisopod.

Jesus christ that thing knows how to leave a first impression.

Dark_Lotus · 62 points · Posted at 09:19:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I seriously have a hard time figuring out what pokémon I want these days because they all look weak af. I know that looks aren't a good fit for judgment but it's like a subconscious feeling

deyesed · 6 points · Posted at 13:17:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Spooder (Araquanid) is hella strong, gets a really fun move pool, and has a cute base evolution.

tilouswag · 3 points · Posted at 13:48:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cant believe I googled that.

ForumPointsRdumb · 9 points · Posted at 14:30:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
oceano7 · 1 points · Posted at 11:18:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Have you got all the recent games?

I think my team in Moon would be a good fit for for you if you're looking for more "serious" looking Pokemon.

Alolen Muk, Aquanid, Golisopod, Arcinine, Greninja, Mimikyu.

jandkas · 3 points · Posted at 22:38:07 on August 10, 2017 · (Permalink)

It doesn't matter people on r/gaming only wish to have their genwunner views reinforced and will refuse to touch anything new Nintendo has produced because of a Freudian refusal to accept their childhood hobbies for the fear that they may be associated with immaturity.

oceano7 · 1 points · Posted at 22:49:51 on August 10, 2017 · (Permalink)

That, and/or superiority complex. Being og doesn't mean shit.

mantism · 9 points · Posted at 10:46:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Golisopod does look like he will fuck you up, though.

Gen 7 does bring some of the intimidating factor back. Decidueye can be scary if you think about it and Salazzle gives off that sly and menacing predator-feel. Heck, Incineroar is sort of pushing it.

The Ultra Beasts, though, I'm not sure if 'intimidating' is the best word to describe them.

transtranselvania · 1 points · Posted at 15:29:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah there are definitely more badass Pokémon then the last couple of generations

HKBFG · 13 points · Posted at 10:03:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

also because they're furries instead of looking like animals.

ubergooner · 2 points · Posted at 14:03:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Idk about you but Golisopod looks pretty thug

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:48:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Greenwolfeth · -2 points · Posted at 11:52:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now it really looks like a 3 year olds game :(

SlacksMeridian · 826 points · Posted at 07:22:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good old round-eye destroying our culture.

Stridsvagn · 216 points · Posted at 09:48:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, triangle-eyes are superior. Not even slit-eye can compete.

noctis89 · 139 points · Posted at 09:52:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Abra is a fucking boss. He just doesn't feel like fighting.

FangornOthersCallMe · 81 points · Posted at 10:12:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Watch him engaging 'em, escaping 'em, enraging 'em!

boundbylife · 23 points · Posted at 10:51:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
i_swear_im_not_lying · 12 points · Posted at 10:41:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Im Out! (Lafayette)

joe1up · 1 points · Posted at 21:23:54 on April 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

I go to France for more funds

thatguy5827 · 1 points · Posted at 19:28:51 on April 17, 2017 · (Permalink)

...and come back with more guns.

joe1up · 1 points · Posted at 21:14:08 on April 17, 2017 · (Permalink)

AND SHIPS

thatguy5827 · 1 points · Posted at 21:33:19 on April 17, 2017 · (Permalink)

and so, the balance shifts.

gonengazit · 1 points · Posted at 19:34:27 on April 18, 2017 · (Permalink)

We rendezvous with Rochambeau, consolidate their gifts

Melonetta · 1 points · Posted at 22:29:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Abra has 90 base SP attack. 90. There are fully evolved special attackers with less SP attack than that.

azaeldrm · 1 points · Posted at 11:45:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Illuminati confirmed.

maclincheese · 1 points · Posted at 13:21:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"And because of my triangular eyes and angry pupils, I'm a member of this planet's top race!"

Tokkemon · 1 points · Posted at 14:04:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Brock was always at a disadvantage.

Star-comandante · 8 points · Posted at 09:10:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's right.

bobotheking · 7 points · Posted at 10:09:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*Meeeowth! That's right!

roborobert123 · 1 points · Posted at 15:11:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Then: Japanese eyes. Now: American eyes.

sorenant · 1 points · Posted at 16:24:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I read "round-eye" but for some reason my brain interpreted it as "round-house" and I wondered what Chuck Norris has to do with this until I read it again.

metalflygon08 · 1 points · Posted at 19:36:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn Metapod started the trend

AggregateFundingRisk · 896 points · Posted at 05:36:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL i could probably name all of the old pokemon by their eyes..

AlastarHickey · 152 points · Posted at 08:57:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ikr? There's a few I'm unsure on but most are obvious

Aurora_Fatalis · 346 points · Posted at 09:29:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, you wouldn't have had as easy of a time if you didn't get the hint of the color around the eyes.

TheloniousPhunk · 3 points · Posted at 13:29:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, those pokemon have been in just about every game since. You are the most used to those pokemon. I could name some of the newer ones, but the old ones have been with me for like... fuck twenty years now. Of course they're easier to recognize.

polonoid75 · 5 points · Posted at 11:26:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can say the same with the ones on the right too.

WhyNotThinkBig · 1 points · Posted at 12:30:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm not 100% sure but is Kangaskhan in the second picture? Or maybe the baby from the mega? Or are my eyes wrong? :P

dankpiece · 2 points · Posted at 13:44:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like the little kanga

GeneralRane · 1 points · Posted at 14:19:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm pretty sure Sporcle has a quiz for that.

[deleted] · 354 points · Posted at 05:22:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you have a really keen eye sometimes you can just tell when a pokemon is designed by someone new, rather than sugi, tajiri, etc from the og crew

Like when I first saw Golurk and Vullaby's lines I knew they were outliers

Even though Sugi redraws everything for the official, there are subtle hints that he didnt design some of them

Edit:I hate my phones keyboard

TheGingerGenocide · 99 points · Posted at 07:46:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is there like a website that states who designed each Pokémon?

[deleted] · 123 points · Posted at 08:07:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Bulbapedia will tell you if each Pokemon was designed by a different person, but that's by a individual Pokemon basis

I think they also have pages for the individual designers and all the Pokémon they each made, like the guy who designed Golurk, Vullaby, and Vannillite.

TheGingerGenocide · 39 points · Posted at 08:16:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looked at the page with all the pokemon by designers and there's HUGE gaps left out. Any reason for this?

a_casserole · 92 points · Posted at 09:24:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Somebody hasn't put in the work

[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 09:42:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but if they didn't put in the work at all, how did the pokemon get designed! Where do pokemon come from?!

Angus-Zephyrus · 36 points · Posted at 10:16:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, when a mommy pokemon and a daddy pokemon love each other very much, they hang out in a daycare together for a while and then an egg comes from nowhere in particular.

Unidangoofed · 10 points · Posted at 10:53:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

eyy bby, wan sum fuk? - Ditto

velocity010 · 2 points · Posted at 11:18:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mommy and daddy also need to be in the same egg group.

Or either mommy or daddy needs to be a sicko and be into dittos.

WhiteHawk93 · 3 points · Posted at 12:03:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Everyone's into Dittos, even Pokés with no gender whatsoever. They can be whatever you want them to be, baby.

Hobocannibal · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, darwins theory of evolution means shit all in this world so who knows!?

[deleted] · 13 points · Posted at 10:50:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Probably never publicly stated who actually designed what

EDIT: nvrmnd if we're looking at the same one (http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/User:Altruis/List_of_Pokémon_by_their_designers) its just incomplete, James Turner is the guy who designed Golurk, Vullaby, and Vannillite and they're not on the list

So probably a combination of unfinished project on Bulbapedia and missing data as in non-public info

Listen_up_slapnuts · 1 points · Posted at 14:04:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are* huge gaps

Dr_Yay · 1 points · Posted at 12:06:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I bet Bulbapedia gets tons of ad revenue from people who scroll through each individual Pokémon page

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:03:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They better with how bad their ads tend to be (performance-wise)

LoDart210 · 3 points · Posted at 14:20:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah like tyrantrum was designed by someone who used to work on tcg and poster art, that was invited to work on xy when his work was recognized by Sugimori.

Tyrantrum is one of my favorite pokemon of all time. The designer, Hitoshi Ariga, has made some other pokemon that really click with me, like mega beedrill, the aurorus line, and some alolan forms.

To me, it seems like he really knows how to stick to the OG design of taking an animal, sprinkling it with details, and then expanding on those details in evolution, while also trying to making the designs more fresh and detailed compared to older generations.

very_sweet_juices · 2 points · Posted at 10:57:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean Vanilluxe wasn't from the pen of Sugimori??? /s

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 13:05:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Vanilluxe's line is what first broke my naivety of all the Pokemon being designed by one guy

silveraith · 1 points · Posted at 15:08:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had the same feeling when I saw Mega Gengar. I knew it was designed by Hitoshi Ariga because the way the eyes look is the same way he draws eyes in his Mega Man manga.

downonthesecond · 1 points · Posted at 18:20:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you have a really keen eye sometimes you can just tell when a pokemon is designed by someone new, rather than sugi, tajiri, etc from the og crew

Wait, Pokemon aren't real?

[deleted] · -7 points · Posted at 08:07:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 13 points · Posted at 08:12:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd have to sit down and analyze each Pokemon art, on mobile that'd be pain. However it'd be as simple as going on Bulbapedia and looking at old Pokemon art (you might even be able to tell between the few OG designers, ie Rhydon has a vastly different art feel than say Snorlax)

GreenTGR · 379 points · Posted at 07:51:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it really fair to say that when one side has mostly evolved/single stage Pokémon and the other are mostly NFE?

Masterness64 · 176 points · Posted at 09:03:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thats actually a really good point. I looked at some of the fully evolved forms from the right and found that some do have more angular looking eyes like the left side.

ThreeTestikillz · 65 points · Posted at 09:41:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Even when they don't, like Shieldon's version, Bastiodon. You can compare to Omanyte and Omastar. Neither of those had angular eyes. As a 30 year old who has played every generation and still plays Pokemon cards, this makes me irrationally upset. What more do people want? Sigh.

Auctoritate · 7 points · Posted at 10:30:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, obviously there are going to be exceptions. Things like Omanyte look all cutesy on purpose. Get to its evolution, Omastar, though, and even with soft round eyes it looks intimidating because it's all spiky and has that nasty looking mouth.

TimbuFTZB · 4 points · Posted at 10:31:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

pokemon that look like they're fighters instead of plushes

Golokopitenko · 5 points · Posted at 10:22:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like you're cherrypicking here. Omanyte/Omastar seems to be an exception on that trend, and I have a strong feeling they both have round eyes only because the animal they're based on also has.

ThreeTestikillz · 18 points · Posted at 10:50:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm cherry picking from 200? And he's cherry picking from 500? He only listed basic/stage one. Come on.

Golokopitenko · -3 points · Posted at 11:02:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't follow the latest generations much, could you give me some examples?

ThreeTestikillz · 11 points · Posted at 11:15:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Check my comment history. Zoroark, Malamar, Garchomp, there are plenty badass designs.

Golokopitenko · 1 points · Posted at 08:45:39 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

You gave me an idea... I could try an ANOVA and compare badasses per generation.

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 12:35:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

ThreeTestikillz · 9 points · Posted at 12:36:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jynx, DRAGONITE, lickitung, tangela... All rounded weak eyes.

zyocuh · 6 points · Posted at 12:40:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree with ya there, people try to argue but can't see past the "nostalgia" glasses that my generation was the best generation.

CrustyMustard · 7 points · Posted at 14:57:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's not cherry picking in the slightest. A good third of the originals do not have the angular eye design. What about the entire Dratini line? Mew? Goldeen/Seaking? Jigglypuff and Wigglytuff? Clefairy and Clefable? Heck, Pikachu and Raichu?

AinsleysMeat · 53 points · Posted at 10:32:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly, if you had the eyes of Bulbasaur, Squirtle, Charmander, Eevee, Horsea etc. you'd see more similarities. That being said, there are less 'cute' eyes in Gen 1, although this post is certainly not a true representation of eyes throughout the generations.

ThreeTestikillz · 15 points · Posted at 13:29:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only 150 in Gen 1. We're talking 800 plus now. Including baby pokemon and fairy type. This post is purely "my generation was better". I've been playing since I was in 5th grade. I hold a special place in my heart for Gen 1, but I absolutely love the more recent games. My favorite is X/Y. Pinnacle of the series if you ask me.

ChipOTron · 2 points · Posted at 14:41:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think that's really unfair to OP, and it risks derailing an interesting conversation. He isn't saying that the older games are better or that the newer games are worse, he's simply pointing out one of the many stylistic changes that have occurred over the course of the series. He even goes out of his way to say that he thinks both the older style and modern style are fantastic.

His observation is something I've never noticed before, and it's leading to some really interesting and friendly conversation in the comments here. The photoshops at the top of the thread are especially cool. It's kind of rare for people to politely discuss the differences between the generations in such an in-depth way, so I'm really enjoying this thread.

I agree that some people are too quick to condemn the newer games (or the older games...) but that doesn't mean we can't have polite discussions about how the series has changed over the years. The art has changed quite a bit, and so has the gameplay. We can discuss those changes without thinking they're bad.

ThreeTestikillz · 6 points · Posted at 14:56:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right, I think I unfairly criticize OP, when most of my ire was at many comments calling later generations soft or weak. Thank you for pointing that out to me, sorry OP!

ChipOTron · 3 points · Posted at 15:07:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for being cool about it! Apologies if I seemed a little harsh. I agree that some people are being a lot less reasonable than OP is being, but they seem to be in the minority and they're getting (rightfully) called out for it.

It's also true that plenty of older Pokémon had rounder eyes while plenty of newer Pokémon had more angular eyes, but I think OP is right to point out that older designs had a more angular and restrained style in general, and one place you can see this is in the level of detail and curvature in the eyes. You can also see a change in how the pupils are handled. Its easy to notice the change from ink and watercolor to the modern digital art, but I'd never noticed this specific change before.

I think my favorite thing about this thread is how most people are discussing the changes from a positive and friendly perspective. Discussions about the evolution of the series tend to turn into arguments most of the time, so it's really nice to see the community coming together to discuss art in a reasonable way without trashing each other for having different preferences. We could use more of that, I think.

ThreeTestikillz · 3 points · Posted at 16:21:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I do agree there, about the restrained style. Many designs were very simplistic but I also think that's due to graphical and animation constraints. I'm personally very very happy with the art direction the series has taken-- Noivern is my personal favorite Pokemon, I don't think a design like that would have translated well to the Kanto region's Pokemon.

ChipOTron · 1 points · Posted at 18:01:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm a bigger fan of simple designs (in general, not just in Pokemon) but there are plenty of those in newer gens too, especially recently. One of my favorite parts of this series is that it reinvents itself every generation, so there's room for lots of different styles of Pokemon, and lots of different kinds of stories.

I'm always going to be a much bigger fan of the more natural/genetics focused designs over the magical/mystical designs, which is one reason I'm a huge fan of the regional variants in SuMo. It's my favorite thing Pokemon has done in years. I hope they do more, and I hope they do variants of Pokemon from other generations.

Basically the only thing I miss from Gen 1 is the more grounded science-fantasy undercurrents that a lot of Pokemon and lore elements had. It was still primarily a fantasy series of course (and most of the designs were fantastical) but the lore was very heavy on genetics and biodiversity and ecological and environmental themes, especially Bill's story, Mewtwo, the fossil subplot, and the literal nature preserve in the form of the Safari zone. It also felt a little more restrained, and dealt with more local and personal plots instead of the world-ending stuff that would become the norm. As a young biology nerd I loved that. It reminded me of hiking through the woods, catching bugs, visiting museums, reading about fossils, and my other real-world hobbies at the time. The Pokemon Adventures manga captures this feeling even better than the games do, sometimes.

This faded into the background a bit as the series went on and focused more on gods and magic and mythology, which makes sense for a series about magical monsters fighting each other. I love that stuff too, but I'll always prefer the more "grounded" stuff, even if it's only grounded by Pokemon standards.

This isn't a visual design thing, this is more of a lore and worldbuilding thing. Luckily every gen has at least a little bit of grounded stuff and sci-fi stuff, even if it falls into the background a bit. And obviously the gameplay has improved a lot as the series has gone on!

It also feels like the last two generations have moved away from being straight-up fantasy games that focus on literal gods and back to being a little more of a sci-fi/fantasy blend again, which I love. I'm a big fan of the direction the series is currently taking. They seem to be doing a really good job of pleasing the old-school cranky fans who prefer the slightly more grounded science-fantasy stuff still having lots of high-stakes mystical stuff for the fans who prefer the feel of Gens IV-V. It's a good blend.

...that ended up longer than I intended!

TL;DR I think more elaborate designs work very well for the more fantastical and mystical Pokemon, and more restrained designs work better for more "realistic" ones. I'll always prefer the more restrained aspects of the Pokemon universe because that's what I initially fell in love with, but both are important and have their place.

ThreeTestikillz · 152 points · Posted at 09:34:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. MOSTLY all of the Pokemon on the right are basic/stage one. All of the Pokemon on the left are stage one/two. In fact, the zoroark has angular eyes, evolution of one of these rounded eyes. The Malamar has neat angular rectangular eyes, evolved from the cute basic rounded eyes in the right picture. A ton of these are just picked and chosen poorly. Good call.

casual_yak · 131 points · Posted at 09:53:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good call. Look up Charmander and Bulbasaur and compare that to Charazard and Blastoise. These examples are cherry picked to be misleading.

Edit: OP might be on to something, but the examples are not proportionately representational.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 10:43:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

we are in the age of fake news. i hate to be a bitchly but i must downvote this post.

Tristan_Afro · 17 points · Posted at 10:57:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

THANK YOU! Someone mentioned how they could name the Pokémon just by their eyes. I started doing that and then picked up on this.

God, we're talking talking about Pokémon of all things, but we still can't escape god damn FAKE NEWS.

Poppin__Fresh · 25 points · Posted at 10:34:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah this post is biased AF

CrustyMustard · 2 points · Posted at 14:54:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This. Pokemon generally are designed to go from "cute" to "intimidating" as they evolve. Most of the ones selected for the "new" eyes section have not evolved into their final forms. Zoroark, Gothitelle, Kangaskhan (really, we're pulling the Mega's baby as "new" eyes?), and Luxray (can't identify them all unfortunately) have eyes that are much more in line with the "old" kind of eyes. So pointing to this like it's some kind of smoking gun is foolish.

The only thing that determines whether or not a new Pokemon looks like a Pokemon to us is time. When Gen 4 came out, a lot of people were saying the exact same things (Pokemon has run out of ideas, the new Pokemon don't look anything like Pokemon, etc, etc.) but now, you don't hear many people (outside of Generation 1 purists maybe) saying that they don't consider Probopass or Bidoof a Pokemon. You're going to hear people complain, likely for a while, that newer Pokemon "don't fit the design of the originals." That's because people have crazy high standards and expectations for new ones to join the roster, and when they aren't up to those expectations (which is impossible, because everyone has different standards and expectations), the old "THESE AREN'T POKEMON" argument gets drug out again.

TL;DR: This post is rather misleading, time is the only determining factor on whether or not new Pokemon are considered Pokemon, quit dragging the old tired "these aren't pokemon" argument out.

SuperSaiyan5wag · 2 points · Posted at 00:08:59 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea, this list is just nitpicked. Classic /r/gaming.

IwannaPeeInTheSea · 1 points · Posted at 12:11:07 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, it's an obvious inherent style change. It doesn't matter if you're comparing legendaries to the weakest pokemon around, there's no gen ones that have the anime eyes, and there's no new gens that have the simple angled with just a pupil eyes

polonoid75 · -3 points · Posted at 11:49:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Either way it is fair. I did a random test by looking at random fully evolved Pokemon, and none of them had triangular eyes, they were always rounded.

WhyNotThinkBig · 7 points · Posted at 12:58:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Ardub23 · 2 points · Posted at 15:25:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the argument is that "triangle with dot" is cooler than any shape with any degree of roundness, which means some of those don't count. Still, Zoroark, Silvally, Binacle, Samurott, Toucannon, Hoopa Unbound, Incineroar, Tyrantrum, Zekrom, Terrakion, Kommo-o, and Stoutland all have fully (or mostly) angular eyes, and just about half of Gen I's fully evolved Pokémon—including Venusaur, Golbat, Poliwrath, Tentacruel, Gengar, Cloyster, Magmar, Kingler, and Articuno—all have rounded shapes for eyes.

WhyNotThinkBig · 2 points · Posted at 15:31:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but... triangle with dot means cool gen 1 (true gen) pokemon. anything else HAS to have a circle and is fake pokemon. (/s)

polonoid75 · 2 points · Posted at 19:30:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for this. Some of these examples still have rounded eyes, so I think it is true that gen 1 did have more triangular eyes, but overall I love old and new pokemon so it doesn't matter.

WhyNotThinkBig · 1 points · Posted at 19:46:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

BTW gen 1 have more rounded eyes than non rounded eyes. I think someone said 86 rounded vs 84 pointed (and zubat is by itself because no eyes)

_KAS_ · 108 points · Posted at 12:05:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But in first generation, more Pokemon have round eyes than angular eyes.

I'm counting roughly (super roughly),
82 with round eyes
68 with angle eyes

I didn't include zubat, who has no eyes.

DreadNephromancer · 36 points · Posted at 13:57:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I didn't include zubat, who has no eyes.

This is actually the secret reason gen 7 is best: it tripled the number of pokemon that don't even have eyes.

HumanAtlas · 24 points · Posted at 15:44:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It also Infinitely increased the number of Pokemon with front facing buttholes! Pyukumuku is the best

darexinfinity · 2 points · Posted at 15:31:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do they have blindsight as an ability?

IwannaPeeInTheSea · 0 points · Posted at 12:16:03 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes you're completely missing the point here. It's not about angled vs round, it's about the simple, white space with a single small pupil of the early gens compared to the anime style eyes of the new gens. The first gens had eyes that were based on the shape of the Pokemon where the new gens always have anime eyes no matter what. There are 0 first gen Pokemon with the anime eyes with huge iris in the middle, and there are a significantly large portion of the new Pokemon with anime eyes, regardless of the fact that they might be slightly angled, they're a completely different art style. I don't know why people are boiling it down to angled vs round, that's obviously not the whole case if you actually look at the eyes, and that's not the point OP was trying to make.

_KAS_ · 4 points · Posted at 13:04:14 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)
leonfook · 64 points · Posted at 10:33:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Toucannon disagree. Toucannon need you to stop cherry picking.

[deleted] · 32 points · Posted at 10:18:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't know enough about recent pokemon to comment on the right, but I'd think it's a fairly common thing to have imposing (usually fully evolved) pokemon to have intimidating eyes and earlier evolutions to have cuter eyes. You could probably put together a round-eyed equivalent featuring... Magikarp, Weedle, Dragonite, Ghastly, Tangela, Pikachu, Raichu, Grimer, Koffing, Horsea, and so on.

kainel · 3 points · Posted at 14:42:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dorpz · 278 points · Posted at 09:55:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pretty cool idea but this is pretty cherry picked.

There's gen 1 pokemon with the "new" eyes (not as detailed but still) and there's "then" eyes in XY and Sun/Moon.

That being said damn there's a lot of cutesy stupid blobs in sun moon.

Beta_Ace_X · 152 points · Posted at 13:03:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget that Toucannon is a bad bitch who don't need your approval.

Coyena · 27 points · Posted at 13:34:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man he looks so judgy. I feel ashamed just trying to make eye contact with that image

Beta_Ace_X · 35 points · Posted at 13:42:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Toucannon is disappointed with you at all times.

hiero_ · 1 points · Posted at 04:16:47 on April 22, 2017 · (Permalink)

Just like my father

CrustyMustard · 6 points · Posted at 14:59:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Toucannon has permanent "what did you just say about my wife" face.

Moka4u · 5 points · Posted at 20:04:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You'd be pretty pissed off to if you evolved from a woodpecker to a toucan

ArcherInPosition · 10 points · Posted at 14:59:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And Vikavolt just wants you dead.

SavageSvage · 7 points · Posted at 14:02:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Got that ice cube Stank face

vhite · 9 points · Posted at 13:54:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait, that's a pokemon? Just a bird? At least make it purple you savages!

Leopardfire123 · 29 points · Posted at 14:12:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This angry birb's beak heats up whenever it attacks, the stripes of color represents its temperature. This is especially relevant when he uses his signature attack beak blast, which burns anyone who attacks toucannon while he charges it. At first I was like "oh he's just a bird lol" but he grows on you man i love him

vhite · 13 points · Posted at 14:13:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok that's pretty cool.

SimplyQuid · 1 points · Posted at 16:32:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah not gonna lie, he's a surprisingly endearing grump-beak.

zackogenic · 14 points · Posted at 16:27:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pidgey is also just a bird

ArcherInPosition · 3 points · Posted at 17:27:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If anything Tailow is the most basic looking bird

metalflygon08 · 2 points · Posted at 19:40:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's literally a Barn Swallow

Sharpam · 2 points · Posted at 19:45:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I fucking love Toucannon

WhyNotThinkBig · 50 points · Posted at 12:33:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was going to say this. Grimer was first to come to mind as an "old" Pokémon with rounded eyes. Ditto literally just has dots.

As for newer ones Lycanroc has pretty cool eyes that are only half rounded. Incineroar's eyes are pointed like the left pictures.

Dorpz · 19 points · Posted at 12:47:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Braixen and Delphox have pretty cool eyes too http://i.imgur.com/DbKPtUn.png

WhyNotThinkBig · 3 points · Posted at 12:49:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. Their HAs suck though. :,(

edit: fixed the they're to their over there

Ithinkandstuff · 1 points · Posted at 14:52:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What are HAs?

BatmanPotassium · 2 points · Posted at 15:10:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hidden Abilities. All fire starters get the fairly useless 'Blaze' ability as their normal ability, so we usually count on their Hidden Abilities for competitive viability. Blaziken, for instance, has 'Speed Boost', a borderline broken ability. IIRC, Fennekin's line gets 'Magician,' which is pretty trash.

WhyNotThinkBig · 1 points · Posted at 15:08:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hidden Ability

Ithinkandstuff · 2 points · Posted at 16:06:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, right forgot about those, thanks

sylinmino · 2 points · Posted at 15:06:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dragonite is a good example of that. One of the most powerful Pokemon in the first two gens, and still one of the most powerful non-legendaries. "New eyes".

Listen_up_slapnuts · 1 points · Posted at 14:23:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are "then eyes"

the_grandprize · 1 points · Posted at 15:25:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Even with the new pointed or traingular eyes they still aren't all that similar. They still have either the rounded bottom portion, like a half circle, or giant irises. I think a big part of the gen 1-2 eyes were the small pupils with the triangle shape. Bigger pupils/irises leave more room for expression/interpretation of expression making them feel a lot less animalistic in my opinion.

IwannaPeeInTheSea · 1 points · Posted at 12:17:00 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are exactly 0 pokemon in the first gen with huge iris and colorful anime eyes, and there are exactly 0 new Pokemon with the simple white space with a dot eyes

Dorpz · 3 points · Posted at 13:07:58 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)
BlazingPug · 167 points · Posted at 11:49:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey, not all old mons and new mons look like that. Some of the newer mons still look intimidating!

Although it is kinda true that a large number of the newer mons have rounder eyes, but so do some of gen 1's.

http://i.imgur.com/nHTa7fb.png

EDIT: More unnecessary and poorly made comparisons!

http://i.imgur.com/YlPiSUC.png

http://i.imgur.com/40uV5w5.png

Shows how old mons' slanted eyes are more 'simplistic' in design compared to the new ones'. Maybe that's what makes it so much different to other people.

WhyNotThinkBig · 19 points · Posted at 13:05:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can I steal this? I'll credit you

BlazingPug · 10 points · Posted at 13:09:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sure, go ahead.

Maxiumite · 10 points · Posted at 14:58:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But that goes against the circlejerk...

BlazingPug · 11 points · Posted at 15:02:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

sageamagoo · 3 points · Posted at 16:54:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But only, like, 1/3 of those have a shape that isn't round. Just because the eyelid is closed half way or blocked by the eyebrow doesn't mean the styling's any different.

Your third image really helps demonstrate this: http://i.imgur.com/40uV5w5.png

The old ones are all VERY close to each other, and the new ones are all very much not. The OP even used Zorua to help prove his point, yet you included it in your rebuttal

mutantmike · 9 points · Posted at 14:41:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This needs to be higher up. There are tons of new Pokemon that have intimidating eyes. Like Vikavolt. Dude doesn't even have pupils.

the_grandprize · 2 points · Posted at 15:27:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

True, but most of those rounded eyes aren't final evolutions.

Also look how busy the patterns are around the eyes on the bottom part compared to the top. That's a big factor as to why some people prefer older pokemon as well.

BlazingPug · 17 points · Posted at 15:29:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but most of those rounded eyes aren't final evolutions.

The same can be said on OP's image.

the_grandprize · 3 points · Posted at 15:34:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's true too. But the pokemon on the bottom in yours don't have the same eyes as the ones on the right in OP's either. They're half circles and not triangles. Very different. They could have added any of the eyes from the bottom part of your picture to the "new" part on theirs and still made the same point.

BlazingPug · 7 points · Posted at 15:39:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

True but that's not what every other comment on here is talking about. Just look at the top comments. They keep saying the angled/slanted eyes are more intimidating and the rounder eyes are more cutesy and that's why they prefer it over the other. And some even make it look like round eyes didn't exist in the old mons and only the new mons have it.

This just simply shows that the old ones have "cutesy" eyes and the new ones have "intimidating/angry eyes" too, it's not mutually exclusive.

If anything, it shows how much more variety the new mons have when it comes to the "intimidating eyes" (most of the old mons only have dots and slashes for pupils while the new ones mix it up).

the_grandprize · 3 points · Posted at 15:57:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

More variety, yes. But the same affect isn't achieved in my opinion. In a different comment I said how the pupils and irises of the new pokemon a lot different too. They are bigger in the newer ones (talking mostly final evolutions here) which makes them more expressive and that tends to make them look less animalistic/intimidating and more friendly.

BlazingPug · 1 points · Posted at 16:09:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I get your point, my image doesn't go well with what you're talking about, I understand that. What you're talking about is different to the majority of the other comments in here that I've read. You have a different opinion on what makes old mons look different from new mons from what those other comments say. I'm sorry that this image doesn't go with what you say.

I'm just saying that this image is more of a response to the majority of the comments in this thread that makes it look like one type of eyes doesn't exist in the other gen. They imply that round eyes = new mons, slant = old mons. This shows them it's not like that, it's a mixed bag.

the_grandprize · 2 points · Posted at 16:45:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I understand. But also semicircles =/= traingles

one_love_silvia · 5 points · Posted at 16:32:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They never should have changed from the original design. Could you imagine if dragonball super changed their eyes to be more modern?

BlazingPug · 1 points · Posted at 16:36:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also kinda like what they did with Ash's eyes in the anime. It bugged me at first but it gradually grew on me.

one_love_silvia · 3 points · Posted at 16:41:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea i hate his new design

HumanAtlas · 1 points · Posted at 15:46:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I feel like the most useful comparison would be to use only fully evolved Pokemon, and break them up by generation. Just to see if there are any interesting patterns

Mnstrzero00 · 1 points · Posted at 18:55:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Where the fuck are people getting this pics from? Are you guys just making these up on the fly?

mushroom_taco · 2 points · Posted at 19:22:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Uh, yes? It's really easy, crop, copy, paste.

Mnstrzero00 · 2 points · Posted at 19:41:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For 116 internet points on reddit?. Not worth the time

mushroom_taco · 1 points · Posted at 20:24:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not worth 5 minutes for 57k internet points you mean?

Are you seriously implying this takes effort anyhow?

Mnstrzero00 · 1 points · Posted at 22:26:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

it takes five minutes. I personally couldn't be that invested in creating an image to make a point in this discussion. Not judging anybody but its interesting.

sparky662 · 74 points · Posted at 09:53:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mostly seem to be comparing fully evolved older Pokemon with unevolved later ones. Generally pokemon start with 'cuter' eyes and get more aggressive when they evolve. To use a couple of your examples Charmander to Charizard or Zorua to Zoroark. They both start with cute eyes and get pointier more aggressive eyes when they evolve. It's not universal, but your argument doesn't really hold up when you look into it.

alex494 · 19 points · Posted at 11:24:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jokes on you, Magnemite has the roundest eyes of all.

metalflygon08 · 1 points · Posted at 19:42:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ditto

loganbesalke · 16 points · Posted at 07:21:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I didn't say I like those and to tell you the truth I don't really like voltorb/electrode and Grimer/Muk that much. Magnemite is cute tho how can you hate him

WhyNotThinkBig · 2 points · Posted at 12:36:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Magnemite is god. I think /u/WDey agrees.

RQK1996 · 1 points · Posted at 14:55:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

they caused me to hate them, I used to be just indifferent

Animal31 · 16 points · Posted at 11:50:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
13ulbasaur · 116 points · Posted at 10:07:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Does't this seem a bit cherry picked? Comparing them to a bunch of Pokemon that are designed to look more cutesy (or... interesting, in bruxish's case).

Lexifox · 19 points · Posted at 11:16:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You could put the Poli line in the "new" Pokemon and nobody would notice.

[deleted] · 32 points · Posted at 13:11:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

wesleyaaron · 35 points · Posted at 13:14:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

People will always complain about how the "good old days" were way better. Pretty much no matter what. It has very little to do with the shape of Pokémon's eyes and much more to do with nostalgia and Pokémon fans not being children anymore. Those type of people will always be dissatisfied with modern anything.

Edit: Spelling error

darexinfinity · 3 points · Posted at 15:35:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

ding ding ding ding

Namagem · 1 points · Posted at 18:06:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

'member the cool looking Pokemon? I 'member.

DrDiablo361 · 4 points · Posted at 19:56:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Everything stopped being styled after Toriyama, basically.

He was a huge influence in the anime art we got in the late 90s

[deleted] · 37 points · Posted at 11:39:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice cherry picking.

mwinks99 · 3 points · Posted at 14:32:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sad I had to search forever on this thread to see someone point this out. Like WTF? The original 151 have both types of eyes.

dodvedvrede_ · 62 points · Posted at 06:08:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Different eyes.

Weird, angular or geometric style designs.

TinierRumble449 · 53 points · Posted at 10:03:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a fine example of cherry picking to force a point.

Mindofthequill · 10 points · Posted at 14:30:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cherry-picked really...both types exist in any generation. So there's 802 Pokemon now, nobody says you have to like 'em all. (Come to think of it, I'm personally impressed by the sheer number of Pokemon there are now, I could never sit there and basically "play god" for a game series and create so many new species.)

It's mainly just a change in art style, possibly Ken Sugimori's in this case, as any artist can go through.

Hoshigumi · 20 points · Posted at 11:21:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

ITT: people acting like there haven't always been shit & lazy pokemon designs

GongTheHawkEye · 27 points · Posted at 11:17:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I saw this really cool fanart that took Charizard (gen 1) and Garchomp (gen 4) and drew them as if they came out in the other's generation. I can't find it though, shame because it's pretty interesting to see how the general style of Pokemon changed so drastically between gens 1 through 4. I kinda want more artwork like that, I'd love to see what gen 1 versions of some other newer Pokemon look like.

Woofgangsta · 45 points · Posted at 11:30:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
GongTheHawkEye · 6 points · Posted at 11:38:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, that one, thanks.

Lurvig · 8 points · Posted at 12:22:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah they fixed that with mega-charizard

Dragonstark · 2 points · Posted at 11:34:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I remember there's a website that does a similar thing, but for all pokemons. You just type in two pokemons and it would return a merged, new pokemon.

Twoten210 · 4 points · Posted at 13:04:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Dragonstark · 3 points · Posted at 13:12:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes! That's it

EpicalaxyMaster · 1 points · Posted at 11:38:12 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Will this ever get updated with new pokemon?

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 10:16:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

popsicleemperor · 1 points · Posted at 13:16:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good point though! Even culturally​ this makes sense. Cute things do sell Better in Japan! There are mascots for cities, schools, games, malls that reflect this cute characterization trend. While in North America creatures should be " cool" and "tough". Perhaps a reflection of cultural trend was growing up for me, where people often said Pokemon was for " boys". Which is silly of course.

Moulinoski · 1 points · Posted at 15:11:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wasn't there a story about how Nintendo of America wanted Pokémon to be redesigned specifically for Americans (i.e., make them angrier and ugly) but they were refused and we got Pokémon in pretty much in an unmodified state?

rukioish · 13 points · Posted at 13:54:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This thread makes me sick. The staggering amount of circle-jerk stupidity is saddening. Way to base an opinion off our 20 eyes out of 700+ pokemon.

Classic mob rule reddit, way to go.

NihilsticEgotist · 2 points · Posted at 12:40:54 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

*802

rukioish · 2 points · Posted at 14:03:25 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

in fairness, 802 falls under the realm of 700+ :)

Sparky_Malarkey · 24 points · Posted at 09:00:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The ones on the left are all final evolutions/legendaries aka the tough baddies. The ones on the right are almost all baby/pre evolved forms aka the cutesy ones. There's definitely new ones that look all gruff and tough too.

Extreme_Boyheat · 6 points · Posted at 09:05:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

final evolutions/legendaries

Voltorb, Spearow, Geodude

Sparky_Malarkey · 20 points · Posted at 09:13:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Okay I suppose that's fair, but almost all of the ones on the right side are babies. The only one that I can identify that isn't a smallest evolution/baby form is bruxish. They even have kangaskhans baby over there, not even its own pokemon.

Yatagurusu · 12 points · Posted at 10:16:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

And worst of all they evolve to have angular eyes too

JustWoozy · 22 points · Posted at 10:09:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
WhyNotThinkBig · 12 points · Posted at 13:04:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

*genwunner

[deleted] · 92 points · Posted at 04:54:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

FrontLawnSean · 134 points · Posted at 05:18:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But pikachu's are just black dots.

I think it's more than just the shape. The eyes are also large with big pupils, commonly associated with young/cute things. Also something I personally notice; the old gen eyes give a more 3D feel. Most Pokémon the angled eye gives it a eyebrow/lid kind of thing raised outward. A lot of the new Pokémon have just a round eye that's smooth across to the face.

I hope that makes sense.

CheekyMunky · 65 points · Posted at 08:44:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Charmander, Squirtle, Poliwag, Jigglypuff, Eevee, Horsea... go look through Gen 1 and you'll see there are plenty of Pokemon with big round eyes. There are also plenty of later-generation Pokemon with meaner eyes. OP's image is totally cherry picked.

TimbuFTZB · 14 points · Posted at 10:33:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

but those are all unevolved which makes sense, unevolved Pokemon should look weaker because they are weaker

CheekyMunky · 18 points · Posted at 10:41:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Most of the "soft" eyes in OP's pic are from lower evolutions as well. Their stronger forms typically have sharper eyes, just as in previous generations.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:30:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can think of a few reasons for the more simplified eyes of the Gen 1 and 2 era - aside from the size limitations (had to fit into a certain pixel box), the palette was much more limited.

crazyjoco · 1 points · Posted at 11:04:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Completely agree. I think it's not just the eyes but the combination of everything. Maybe they changed artist.

Doctor_Dewott · 2 points · Posted at 14:10:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nope. It's always been Sugimori.

brozzart · 1 points · Posted at 11:16:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aside from wigglytuff they all evolve into the squinted eyes. I think early Pokémon were meant to start cute and become more monstrous as they evolved.

I don't know any Pokémon outside the original 150 so idk if thats true of newer generations.

CheekyMunky · 2 points · Posted at 11:17:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Read the other comments. This has been brought up multiple times already.

Oughusktaiunten · 1 points · Posted at 11:38:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those eyes still look different than the new eyes. What I've noticed is that most of the new eyes have a colored iris, whereas that was rare in older designs. Most Gen I pokemon just had black dots, often without a sclera. The ones with round eyes also functioned differently. The new designs have a straight line going through the round eye as a sort of eyelid or eyebrow. Aside from those portions also being brightly colored, the old eyes didn't have that at all, and the eye itself would warp to show emotion.

adozu · -2 points · Posted at 10:39:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Charmander

that's the point however, it starts out cute but becomes badass with evolutions.

CheekyMunky · 10 points · Posted at 10:42:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

...and subsequent generations have continued in that same vein.

Oreo_ · -2 points · Posted at 10:58:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those are all 1st evolution pokemon and the round eye helps portray the child/baby vibe. The pokemon slowly become more menacing as they grow older or evolve. That just doesn't happen in the new ones.

CheekyMunky · 4 points · Posted at 11:06:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Uh... it absolutely does. At least through Gen 6, which was the last one I played.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 10:29:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The old designs had to be more simplified due to the limitations of the medium; there wasn't a TON of room for eye detail because if you wanted a bigger pokemon it still had to fit in the 60 x 30 pixel box. Hence except for a few (wigglytuff) the emphasis had to go somewhere other than the eyes.

With a 3D model especially you have a lot more liberty.

cjpars0ns · 13 points · Posted at 09:20:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I genuinely thought you were gonna reel off the Pokemon rap from the first series.

Phermaportus · 13 points · Posted at 09:24:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Electrode, Diglett, Nidoran, Mankey Venusaur, Rattata, Fearow, Pidgey Seaking, Jolteon, Dragonite, Gastly Ponyta, Vaporeon, Poliwrath, Butterfree

Catch 'em, catch 'em, gotta catch 'em all, Pokémon!

Thysios · 5 points · Posted at 09:33:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Charmeleon, WARTORTLE!!!!!!!!! Mewtwo, Tentacruel, Aerodactyl, Omanyte, Slowpoke, Pidgeot, Arbok - That's all, folks!

(Yes I know that wasn't the next verse)

AggregateFundingRisk · 7 points · Posted at 05:37:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lets look at the trend there: theyre all supposed to be "cute"

PokemonTrainerSilver · 1 points · Posted at 12:58:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not to mention Dragonite, Mew, Articuno, chansey, tangela, magmar, slowbro, exeggutor etc.

Thorrack · 14 points · Posted at 12:33:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No. Its just because people are "genwunners" and act like anything new is bad.

blastoiss · 8 points · Posted at 10:23:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

can't tell if exeggcute or giovanni

Ardub23 · 2 points · Posted at 15:32:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean Giovanni isn't an Exeggcute?

aphrodonis · 7 points · Posted at 11:55:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like both the old and new designs, but honestly I prefer them separate (based on gen).

I think it's pretty disrespectful to the artists who worked on the new stuff though, just because people can't take off the nostalgia goggles.

While I agree that some of the new pokemon look kinda weird (such as victini, not a fan of those designs), I think a lot of the old ones look just as weird. We just accept them more because they were first or played at a younger age.

Whatever you see or experience first is always gonna be "the better one", for anything really.

Also, sometime's the series will switch the cute eyes and the edgy eyes, like Iris' dragonite in one of the newer gen's shows. I loooove dragonite's original cute eyes, but I thought it looked funny with its new and angry eyes. (Seriously, look it up haha)

I enjoy the pokemon series on a casual level and I'm sure most of you do, as well. But do we really need more 'edgy' eyed pokemon?

...Yes, but only on the later/bigger evolutions. ;p

Amnsia · 1 points · Posted at 12:02:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The updated illustrations of the gen 1 Pokemon are a lot better than the initial designs. Not everything that's first is better.

Muglewumper · 7 points · Posted at 14:00:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tbf though there have always been round-eyed Pokemon. This is just cherry picking.

drunkenDAYlewis · 104 points · Posted at 05:20:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So new Pokemon are millennials? And old one are my grandpa?

"When I was a kid we only had 150 pokemons and we were lucky to have them!"

AggregateFundingRisk · 126 points · Posted at 05:36:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

to be frank, the first 150 were pretty fucking perfect

sephlington · 235 points · Posted at 06:53:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seel is a seal.

Eevolveer · 209 points · Posted at 07:56:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Krabby was a crab.

perrilloux · 195 points · Posted at 08:03:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jinx and Mr. Mime are just people.

Arlitto · 137 points · Posted at 08:17:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ekans is Snake backwards.

Ceefax81 · 151 points · Posted at 08:24:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Muk is kum backwards

fuck_azer · 95 points · Posted at 08:29:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Arbok is Kobra backwards!

maddara · 87 points · Posted at 08:54:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Victreebel is Lebeertciv backwards

Granoland · 50 points · Posted at 09:28:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gloom is me every single day haha

sharpie36 · 2 points · Posted at 09:49:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are you okay?

p_iynx · 2 points · Posted at 15:34:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
thezapzupnz · 1 points · Posted at 09:42:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What, dribbling?

holy_shott · 52 points · Posted at 09:28:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pidgey was a pidgeon

holy_shott · 5 points · Posted at 09:29:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Rattata was a rat

mrgonzalez · 3 points · Posted at 09:52:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Elbillug is Gullible backwards

jeffbarrington · 1 points · Posted at 10:24:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well Victreebel is a Nepenthes actually

Djmthrowaway · 8 points · Posted at 08:56:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Charizard is Drazirahc backwards!

Jechtael · 13 points · Posted at 09:24:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair, that sounds like something from D&D or Skyrim. "Draaaah-ziiii-rahhc."

azaeldrm · 1 points · Posted at 11:48:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sounds like a really dangerous drug.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:32:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I lol'ed

TheGingerGenocide · 1 points · Posted at 08:18:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ekans is Snake backwards.

Gyrro · 2 points · Posted at 08:29:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Arbok is kobra backwards

TheGingerGenocide · 4 points · Posted at 08:32:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ekans is Snake backwards.

TNGSystems · 3 points · Posted at 08:43:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Arbok is kobra backwards

TheGingerGenocide · 2 points · Posted at 08:56:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ekans is Snake backwards.

tamtt · 1 points · Posted at 08:41:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Arbok is kobra backwards

Etonet · 8 points · Posted at 09:41:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i think there would've been a larger disconnect between the Pokemon world and ours had there not been "animal"-Pokemon, like seel

Yatagurusu · 7 points · Posted at 09:56:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Everytime they make a none animal design they get complained at. And why not? Animals make good basic designs to make out of. To create a creature that doesn't resemble any animal in out world would be awkward to say the least.

Bluebe123 · 1 points · Posted at 11:19:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Coulda had a better name.

[deleted] · 37 points · Posted at 09:44:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah yes 'floating rock with arms' - truly the pinnacle of design

RaiyenZ · 29 points · Posted at 10:30:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

floating rock with arms and pointy eyes

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 18:17:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 18:46:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought its name was supposed to be based on 'geode dude'

WhyNotThinkBig · 8 points · Posted at 12:38:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really. Remember your 3 glops of purple? The eggs that became a tree? A pokeball that evolves and becomes an upside down pokeball? They're just as bad as some of the older gen Pokémon that are cherry picked like "ice cream cones and trash Pokémon"

darexinfinity · 7 points · Posted at 15:37:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see you have your nostalgia goggles glued onto you.

cheers_grills · 44 points · Posted at 05:48:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jynx/Muk/Koffing/Executor though.

AggregateFundingRisk · 47 points · Posted at 05:55:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

jynx is probably the worst one of the bunch, ill give you that.

its literally a super racist cartoon black lady, with a fortune telling sterotype attached..

I liked muk koffing and eggsecutor especially.

executives take vacations on the beach.. eggsecutor

timetraveltrousers10 · 97 points · Posted at 07:34:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

On mobile now but Jynx is based on a Japanese mythological creature/demon or something. You can google it! It's not racist. Jury's still out on Mr. Popo though.

rattatatouille · 28 points · Posted at 08:05:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's a yuki-onna mixed with a gyaru

PM_ME_UR_BOSOMS_GIRL · 13 points · Posted at 08:22:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its design draws more from a Yama-uba than a Yuki-onna.

Etonet · 8 points · Posted at 09:44:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

popo's a kungfu alien with a turban and a magic carpet, i'm pretty sure there was zero malicious intent

Zantre · 3 points · Posted at 11:15:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't that the same myth that frostlass is based on, too?

[deleted] · -5 points · Posted at 09:35:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So a little like the Indian myth that there were "black demons" in Sri Lanka, when in reality it was just good ol' family racism?

edit: ???

I keep visiting this sub, and each time I get a reminder of how mindless its userbase is.

Aurora_Fatalis · 14 points · Posted at 09:35:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I hate Exeggutor only because I once loaded up a random battle against a pal on pokemon showdown. I randomed a Rapidash that had no fire moves but somehow had Hypnosis. He randomed an Exeggutor as his first mon.

I expected him to switch (after all he should have expected a fire move) so I decided to lead with Hypnosis. Not a move he should be expecting from Rapidash.

His first move was Sleep Talk. Fucking Sleep Talk. As the first move. Into Psychic. Which crit.

Fuck Exeggutor.

Edit: lol but yah fuck burning horse too.

MisterDonkey · 1 points · Posted at 11:47:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A flaming horse is badass.

FUTURE10S · 38 points · Posted at 06:03:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'd actually say that Jynx wasn't intended to be racist, but to be a Pokemon based off the unbelievably fugly ganguro style Japan had (which I think then went the other direction with people trying to whiten their skin instead of tanning it). Either way, Jynx in 3DS Yellow is an illegal sprite now since it has 5 colours because muh racism (GBC sprites can only be 4).

Also other shit Pokemon designs from gen 1: Mr. Mime, Voltorb, Hitmons (imo)

nazara151 · 9 points · Posted at 08:51:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hitmonchan was perfectly fine, up until they introduced genders and suddenly every Hitmonchan is a male.

Angus-Zephyrus · 2 points · Posted at 10:23:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, until rule 63 comes into play.

I have no doubt that there is a hitmon-chan floating around out there somewhere.

dimmidice · 2 points · Posted at 09:35:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuck Mr. Mime.

SSJ_Krillin · -1 points · Posted at 08:49:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I honestly don't see how Jynx is considered racist

Jwillis94 · 7 points · Posted at 09:00:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Stridsvagn · 2 points · Posted at 09:51:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh nooo

SSJ_Krillin · 0 points · Posted at 14:13:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really don't see it. Just because it's trying to portray some kind of black character makes it racist? Is Mr. mime racist cause he's portraying a white mime? Looks like society definition of racism has changed over the years...

magicianfox · 2 points · Posted at 00:00:39 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

For Americans,a long time ago, when someone needed portrait a black person in a cartoon the person was draw as a really black skin and big red lips. This was mostly used to comic purpose.

Now, because this connotation. Everyone who try to create a creature with a black skin and big lips will be seeing as racist.

damlot · 0 points · Posted at 10:56:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait what part of jinx is super racist?

NihilsticEgotist · 1 points · Posted at 12:41:48 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

But Alolan Exeggutor is amazing

BedlingtonTerrier · 3 points · Posted at 12:31:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

to be frank, my childhood was pretty fucking perfect

FTFY

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 10:31:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Voltorb is a pokeball with eyes.

RegalKillager · 4 points · Posted at 10:09:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Charizard is garbage and nobody is ever convincing me otherwise. It's an overhyped, extremely basic dragon who can't even be assed to have an interesting look (yay basic complementary colors) or even be a dragon-type.

WhyNotThinkBig · 2 points · Posted at 13:01:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very true. Both Blastoise and Venusaur outclass it (the latter being in the highest tier) and even in their optimal mega form Mega Venusaur is the best.

drunkenDAYlewis · 3 points · Posted at 06:03:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It was plenty, right?

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 10:16:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I kinda agree with this, only so far as by perfect I mean they exemplify every they try to be, without needing extra pieces or lore etc.

Newer Pokemon tend to have more decor and some need a lot of back story or research to even get them. Take Dodrio vs Toucannon. Dodrio is a bird with three heads that evolves from a bird with two heads, no backstory, no lore as to why, no need for a reason. But for a Woodpecker to evolve into a Toucan? That doesn't make sense at first, 2 to 3 is an easy to convey concept, but a two species being related in the real world and sharing an order in Piciformes, that doesn't come off from just a look

I'd say that's why the OG were perfect in a sense, but it can only go so far, things like Popplio need more flash because Seel has already stole the easy idea

Simsimius · -19 points · Posted at 08:11:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 + 2 is all that exists.

DiamondTiaraIsBest · 4 points · Posted at 10:13:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Genwunner detected!

Simsimius · 2 points · Posted at 20:04:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Twoer*

Jwillis94 · 14 points · Posted at 09:01:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nah, a new one just cane out. They're on Gen 7 now. How did you miss so much?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:54:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I stopped watching when I was 12 is pretty much how I missed out on everything past the originals. It was still Ash, Misty, and the dude with the red bandana when I stopped watching.

WhyNotThinkBig · 3 points · Posted at 12:40:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

(It's actually more popular as a game and that's what everyone is talking about)

Also I think you mean Tracey? I'm behind in the anime

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 22:01:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That sounds right. I definitely never seen the departure of Misty.

Simsimius · 0 points · Posted at 20:02:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No i was saying i prefer gen 1+2,.just from an aesthetic perspective

[deleted] · -9 points · Posted at 09:52:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Still the best and I'll fight anyone who says otherwise. The new ones look whimpy.

Prof_Acorn · 2 points · Posted at 19:51:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Kids today don't even know what "Pokemon" is a contraction for!

NeuroCavalry · 1 points · Posted at 09:29:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

and we only had 150 pokeymans BOTH WAYS

Perridur · 6 points · Posted at 14:18:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I guess it's all a matter of which ones you pick.

I wonder how this thread looked like if OP posted this picture instead?

JDC1043 · 1 points · Posted at 14:35:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pumpkaboo is wrong. That isn't it's eye.

PastelDeUva · 1 points · Posted at 15:03:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not really

Even if you put angry against angry and round against round, they still look different. Old round ones used to be brighter and the pupils (often black) and irises were bigger, while many of the new ones in this image are dimmer, with smaller white pupils and irises.

The angry eyes used to be dot-small in most cases, and they looked simmilar. For the new ones, at least in this image, each pokémon has their own distinct kind of eyes.

Overall, the new eyes seem to be more expressive (in a cartoonish way) and with more personallity, but the older ones looked more animalistic or beast-like.

squelchy20 · 2 points · Posted at 22:04:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Older eyes also had more definition as opposed to the bold circles on later Pokemon.

Maxiumite · 7 points · Posted at 14:59:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah because those few eyes represent all the hundreds of new pokemon

InducedPhobia · 7 points · Posted at 17:32:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cherry picking. Mons like Jigglypuff, Grimer, Charmander, etc all have round, soft eyes. It depends on the Pokemon and its personality.

I mean fuck guys, have you SEEN Pikachu?

Groadee · 6 points · Posted at 18:59:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice cherry picking dawg

Thrashinuva · 4 points · Posted at 20:34:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If you don't pick the cherries quickly then the cherry trees will die and you'll have to plant new ones and then wait a day.

henne-n · 7 points · Posted at 20:25:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Who could forget Pikachu's eyes, riiight?

killmeimcanada · 40 points · Posted at 06:50:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mylittlepokemon

cockroachking · 6 points · Posted at 09:21:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's what I thought before I read the title.

PigNamedBenis · 1 points · Posted at 03:13:32 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

so nintendo bronies? That's really creepy.

danivus · 71 points · Posted at 09:07:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What a shitpost.

Just look at the original 151 and you'll find plenty of round eyes, just like you can find examples of the < shape in the newest gen.

ThreeTestikillz · 34 points · Posted at 09:49:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. He just picked a bunch of basic/stage ones vs stage one/stage 2 in the other photo. If you look at the evolved forms of most of the pictures on the right they're angular and badass. Even the ones that aren't you can find evolutions that match in gen 1/2. Omastar has rounded eyes, as does Bastiodon (evolved from the rounded eyes shieldon pictured). Triggered me. Glad to see it pissed someone else off too.

Yatagurusu · 13 points · Posted at 10:15:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ik he chose gibles eyes instead of Garchomp. Which probably has the most hate filled eyes in pkmn

Ardub23 · 6 points · Posted at 15:34:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sounds like someone doesn't know about Toucannon

DrPseudonym · 2 points · Posted at 16:31:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lol, best eyes ever!

GieterHero · -1 points · Posted at 11:25:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What a shitpost

the original 151

And isn't it ironic... don't you think

Elranzer · 6 points · Posted at 13:56:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is similar to how Kirby becomes Mad Kirby for USA box art.

[deleted] · 17 points · Posted at 10:26:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

makepokemonasianagain

DilbusMcD · 23 points · Posted at 09:20:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
One-Two-Woop-Woop · 6 points · Posted at 09:21:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah seriously... There are plenty of gen 1 Pokemon with round eyes.

Fatyolk · 6 points · Posted at 09:25:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well you put only baby Pokémon on the left so...

LuceTheBard · 5 points · Posted at 11:12:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think Sun and Moon has the best overall monster designs

Woofgangsta · 1 points · Posted at 11:39:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Too bad the games themselves were lackluster.

KungFuActionJeSuis · 5 points · Posted at 13:18:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is just like the age old discussion about tomb raider titties. Triangle versus round

Whatever_It_Takes · 3 points · Posted at 13:38:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Since it seems only a few people have noticed that the first generation also included Pokemon with round, "weak" eyes, it's safe to lable this thread as a huge fucking circle jerk.

BCProgramming · 4 points · Posted at 15:39:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are new Pokemon that use the "slanted" eye style, just as there are old pokemon that have much rounder eye styles. This would only hold true if people dislike the look of older pokemon that use the non-angled eye style, which would include Bulbasaur, Ivysaur, Venusaur, Charmander, Squirtle, Ekans, Pikachu, Raichu, Sandshrew, Vulpix, Jigglypuff, Paras, Parasect, Venomoth, Diglett, Meowth, Psyduck, Poliwag, Poliwhirl, Machop, Weepinbell, Machop, Slowpoke, Slowbro, Magnemite, Farfetch'd, Seel, Dewgong, Grimer, Shellder, Krabby, Tangela, Horsea, Mr.Mime, Magikarp, Eevee, Flareon, Jolteon, Vaporeon, Omanyte, Omastar, Dratini, Dragonair, Dragonite.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 18:34:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Who the hell says new Pokemon "don't look like Pokemon"?

PoptartKing86 · 5 points · Posted at 19:45:10 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

When you cherry pick your examples and get gold

Ceoper10 · 5 points · Posted at 13:16:36 on August 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those People lack imagination. Pokémon can look like anything and can based off anything. Pokémon are not animals. They are pocket monsters. pocket monsters can look like anything.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 16:23:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

https://imgur.com/a/fWwcj

I did some. some funny some cool. let me know if you have ideas (i think my other comment got eaten)

[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 09:11:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's mainly because of nostalgia. I get it too, primarily with the Hoenn region, but I still look at every game analytically with each of its flaws. Do I play the ones that I deem the worst less? Sure, but that doesn't mean that I hate them entirely. If I did hate one of the games, like Pokemon Dash, I wouldn't be replaying it. People can still love games despite their flaws, like me. I do admit that the original Hoenn does have the hardest National Pokedex to complete, but it's still my favorite region regardless of that fact (the Kanto remakes do too, as they are in the same generation, but it's not my favorite region). Every game has its flaws and merits, but unless you go through each one, you won't know how you feel about it compared to the previous games that you've played. Hence why nostalgia works. You can't compare unless you've experienced it before, so you're almost always going to put the first one in a higher regard.

popsicleemperor · 3 points · Posted at 13:14:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great points! I think one of the biggest thing that dismayed me when the shift in the games began is that many friends started to " hate" the new games or characters because they didn't look the " same". They couldn't see past this sudden Change and refused to try or play it. I mean it's of course within their right to decide not to, but the basis was indeed " this doesn't fit my nostalgic image, so I refuse to play it". Very "purist". I really commend you for playing things despite disliking some aspects. That's a much more realistic way to go about playing things. Games are under meant to be fun, in the end. And we will never know if we'll like it till we try.

wuchta · 7 points · Posted at 08:34:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Triangle eyes feel more aggressive.

branondorf · 3 points · Posted at 07:30:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What's the one on the bottom right of the gen 1 side? I can't figure it out for the life of me

Edit: I couldn't properly express what I'm trying to say

ttw219 · 9 points · Posted at 08:48:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
smithyithy_ · 3 points · Posted at 09:31:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is correct

TheMaroonAxeman · 1 points · Posted at 07:44:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Inkay

branondorf · 2 points · Posted at 07:52:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sorry, I need to learn to describe things better. Bottom right on the gen 1 side

DanKeltic · 1 points · Posted at 09:59:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it might be Gen 2 Lugia?

TomFawkes · 1 points · Posted at 08:02:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aerodactyl.

TheMaroonAxeman · 0 points · Posted at 08:05:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think that's a gen 1 Pokemon. It looks like Aerodactyl but I don't think it has that crooked tooth pointing up.

TheGingerGenocide · 0 points · Posted at 07:43:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its inkay isn't it?

CheekyMunky · 0 points · Posted at 09:00:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eye is all Onix, but I'm not sure where the white triangle on the bottom is coming from.

slorebear · 3 points · Posted at 11:37:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fucking christ who cares

ChipAyten · 3 points · Posted at 12:33:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I want my fictitious characters to look more realistic!

TylerWestonCO · 3 points · Posted at 12:42:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just want a pet bulbasaur that little fucking lettuce

MultiPlexityXBL · 3 points · Posted at 12:48:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I would have said the ones that look like ice cream or a stove but sure, we'll go with "the eyes".

o0Dunny0o · 3 points · Posted at 12:51:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dont forget about the magnet one, or the one thats just a pile of goo

-GWM- · 2 points · Posted at 13:10:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or the pokeball!

d1nomite · 2 points · Posted at 13:13:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You forgot about the one that's just a freaking pokeball

o0Dunny0o · 2 points · Posted at 17:07:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or the other one thats just an upside down pokeball

Branthers · 3 points · Posted at 13:20:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They've actually quite a few pokemon with the old eyes and there's quite a few old pokemon with the new.

Poliwag Grimer Wigglytuff Shellder Poliwrath Bulbasaur Jigglypuff etc.

all have New eyes.

punkhobo · 3 points · Posted at 13:50:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought that it was because the original Pokémon looked like something specific (Pikachu was a mouse, zubat was a bat, etc) . While the new generations have way more Pokémon that don't have anything specific that they look like. Just my thoughts

Moulinoski · 1 points · Posted at 15:14:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think newer Pokémon have had far more intricate and complicated designs. Not all, but many.

I like Krookodile though so maybe that's not the whole story.

Ardub23 · 1 points · Posted at 15:47:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the new generations have way more Pokémon that don't have anything specific that they look like.

Any specific examples?

avasco89 · 3 points · Posted at 13:51:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

no franchise is safe from whitewashing

CaspianX2 · 3 points · Posted at 14:20:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I found some for you to add to the first pic:

These guys have angular eyes

I found some more you can add to the second picture too! Check it out:

All these fuckers have round eyes.

DeAuTh1511 · 3 points · Posted at 14:45:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can't believe no one has linked to this yet:

https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/50064a/i_saw_ucuxries_post_if_pok%C3%A9mon_from_different/

It's not just the eyes, it's the entire change of style from sharp and detailed features, to rounded and loosely drawn features (which naturally includes the eyes).

I just really liked the old art style where it seemed to be a blend of cute-looking and tough-looking, although now it's harder for the newer Pokemon to have this blend and tend to lean one way or the other.

13ulbasaur · 2 points · Posted at 14:55:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The point could have been made with some better comparisons of other Pokemon that are also the same stage, instead they are choosing to compare eyes of mostly evolved Pokemon with a bunch of non fully evolved Pokemon specifically designed to be cute.

nagol93 · 3 points · Posted at 15:09:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I guess their trying to appeal to a different/wider audience. The older Pokemon seem like actual wild animals that will attack you if you mess with them, and if you catch one you feel like you have a strong and aggressive attack animal on your side.

The newer ones look doopy and soft, like "Hay, lets go hug that wild dog/wolf! He looks so friendly". To me it seems like new pokemon are more of stuffed animals then wild creatures. Ya I know some of them have crazy strong stats, but theirs limit on how serious someone can take you when you look your from Build-a-Bear Workshop.

jongargia · 3 points · Posted at 17:13:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I personally can't stand those samey DBZ eyes. They're a diverse set of monsters- give them the strange eyes we have in the animal kingdom!

NihilsticEgotist · 3 points · Posted at 17:16:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Love how ironic this is, both thanks to the massive cherry-picking and the fact that Pokemon's own subreddit (largely composed of those playing since Gen 1) absolutely and rightfully hate this image and this post.

Flashyshooter · 3 points · Posted at 18:46:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lots of gen 1 pokes had circular eyes. Pikachu for one... The angular eyes are good for angry or tough look Pokémon though.

Adsweet · 3 points · Posted at 18:52:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Didn't jiggly puff have eyes like the new Pokémon?

LecherousBastard · 3 points · Posted at 19:24:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They went from Dragonball Z to MLP.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 23:04:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

HOLY SHIT MAN

bob48888454 · 3 points · Posted at 01:07:18 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

This post is really eye opening.

deepshah420 · 3 points · Posted at 04:57:27 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

it's like new cars use old pokemon eyes for headlights and new pokemon got eyes from old cars

oscarkoppe · 11 points · Posted at 08:32:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those round eyes are a little to kawaii for me.

NihilsticEgotist · 2 points · Posted at 17:00:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Golisopod.

blatantly0bvious · -3 points · Posted at 10:37:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It looks like my little pony now, guess you gotta appeal to your audience.

Arealtossup · 5 points · Posted at 08:01:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Okay, I give up. What's that Pokemon between Gothitelle and Bruxish? I can't figure it out for the life of me.

Anyways. Weren't alot of the Pokemon from the Gen I and II designed by the same few people? Over time, more people joined or left the team, so more people were designing Pokemon.

domeforaklondikebar · 2 points · Posted at 08:11:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gogoat

Arealtossup · 1 points · Posted at 08:44:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh. I didn't even consider that it was a grass Pokemon.

rufus10505 · 4 points · Posted at 10:36:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh god, these comments are filled with Genwunners. Save me.

WhiskyTumbler · 3 points · Posted at 09:53:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah this comparison is bullshit. There are plenty of Gen 1 Pokemon like Dragonite, Wigglytuff, Omanyte, Slowpoke + Slowbro and many more that have eyes like the Pokemon on the right. This is just OP karma farming the massive group of people who think that the new Pokemon are rubbish. What they don't realise is that Pokemon was always dumb, you were just a kid when it first came out so you thought it was cool (coming from a person who has played and enjoyed all 7 Gens).

Billy_Rage · 0 points · Posted at 09:55:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have no illusion Pokémon has always been fairly stupid, but I do think the newer gens is a bit much. An ice cream Pokémon? Or a key chain? But then again voltorb is a circle and electrode is he same thing upside down

WhiskyTumbler · 3 points · Posted at 10:01:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grimer is a pile of toxic waste. Having an ice cream or keys as a Pokemon is more creative/interesting imo than stuff like Meowth which is literally just a cat. For every example of a 'bad' new Pokemon name or design there is one pretty much the same in Gen 1.

Billy_Rage · 1 points · Posted at 10:45:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is true, a lot of Pokémon are just creatures. I personally don't like ones that are objects, I can stand the dog Pokémon, or the salmon Pokémon, but the shoe Pokémon or the car Pokémon is a bit much for me. Grimer is a bit lame, muk looks ok through

bencelot · 7 points · Posted at 10:26:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's like dragon Ball Z vs my little pony.

NihilsticEgotist · 2 points · Posted at 17:06:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Titanscape · 6 points · Posted at 12:56:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A.) Not all new Pokémon have rounded eyes.

B.) Not all older Pokémon had triangular eyes

C.) This is the way anime art has gone don't fault the company for trying to keep it fresh.

D.) If you don't like Pokémon any more and prefer the ones from your childhood for nostalgia reasons that awesome! However, stop shitting all over the new ones. You're clearly not the ones buying the games or watching the show anymore so why would they continue to market to people who want nothing to do with the brand anymore. These are the same people that would be saying "oh they never added anything new or anything different. No wonder they went under."

joc95 · 2 points · Posted at 10:35:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the eyes is also kinda a reason i dont like new anime. the style a themes abit too soft

Danny_McBridesmaid · 2 points · Posted at 10:50:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is that Freeza?

jhughes1986 · 2 points · Posted at 11:12:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For me I think my dislike of newer designs is that there's a lot more 'floating shit' than gen 1/2

gandalf_sucks · 2 points · Posted at 11:16:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree. I feel this is a problem of what we need vs we think we want. Pokemon are supposed to be wild feral creatures that you tame, but people just think of them as cuddly cute animals for kids. The old eyes probably spoke to our sense of adventure and danger, whereas the new ones seem like just one damn teletubbies character.

I guess they did it so that they could sell more toys to kids.

NihilsticEgotist · 3 points · Posted at 12:44:57 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Have you heard of the Ultra Beasts? Golisopod? Hoopa Unbound? Garchomp? Rayquaza? A ton of Pokemon post Gen-1 are even more fierce, and this OP is just cherry-picking.

Wiplazh · 2 points · Posted at 11:24:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fuck, that old art just sent me on one hell of a nostalgia trip!

bakers69 · 2 points · Posted at 11:48:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like my little pony eyes.

Archon129 · 2 points · Posted at 12:37:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are watching each other! I think, triangular shape looks more angry

EpicDarkrai491 · 2 points · Posted at 12:39:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In gens 1 and 2, all the Pokemon were designed by the same person, whereas later generations used a range of different designers. I guess Ken Sugimori had a specific way he liked to draw eyes.

-GWM- · 2 points · Posted at 13:12:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sugimori still designs Pokémon though doesn't he?

EpicDarkrai491 · 1 points · Posted at 20:49:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, I think so, although I'm not 100% sure.

decitronal · 2 points · Posted at 04:27:25 on August 31, 2017 · (Permalink)

the reply is a bit late, but they had 5 designers for gen 1, 7-8 for gen 2.

EpicDarkrai491 · 1 points · Posted at 22:31:03 on August 31, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, okay. I guess that was a false rumour then DX

hidden_pocketknife · 2 points · Posted at 12:44:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

These Pokémon are soft these days.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 12:57:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Makes everything look like some massive weabo fest. Why I cant get into a lot of rpgs etcetera these days.

LastPersonYouExpect · 2 points · Posted at 13:01:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow good eye there mate

Drama_Derp · 2 points · Posted at 13:03:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Attitude era vs PG era

TurnaboutAdam · 1 points · Posted at 16:34:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

PG era is better, btw

Hobomanchild · 2 points · Posted at 13:22:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah, good ol' DBZ eyes.

SpiritualButter · 2 points · Posted at 14:03:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I played Pokemon red on Gameboy Colour, then I didn't buy a new Pokemon game until Pokemon X. You can imagine my surprise when there were 500+ new pokemon. It was really nice for me tho, I felt like I was stepping into the game for the first time again as a kid. I like most of the designs, I agree they look less aggressive but maybe that's just because of the way anime has changed over the years.

Sparrowsabre7 · 2 points · Posted at 14:28:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old gens: American Kirby New gens: Japanese Kirby

lordofthe_wog · 2 points · Posted at 14:41:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I stand by my argument that the newer Pokemon look bad because they're over-designed to hell. Lines and patterns everywhere that don't really accomplish anything. If I can use comic book artists as an example, it's like comparing Rob Liefeld to Alex Ross.

TallestFlash · 2 points · Posted at 14:56:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Have to say they looked way more badass back in gen 1

Hebelol · 2 points · Posted at 15:01:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ask and ye shall receive. :) http://i.imgur.com/i58zqgU.png http://i.imgur.com/4BxWlSi.png http://i.imgur.com/2zTdYPH.png I'm honestly having a blast doing these and I would love to do more but it's almost 3am and I am tired as heck. If you guys like them I can do more when I am not about to pass out.

Remouse69 · 2 points · Posted at 15:05:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was discussing this with a friend the other day and I think it's just changed with the style of anime over time. I'm not an anime expert so don't judge me but I remember watching gen 1 around the time of dragon ball z etc and now I think anime for younger audience has got more cutesy and childish so Nintendo had to swap up the style to match this trend.

tamagootchi · 2 points · Posted at 15:06:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That Tentacruel actually looks terrifying.

Scorchykotz · 2 points · Posted at 15:07:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Something entirely differnt: Could you try making a Charizard with the new eyes? Would be curious how strange it looks

darexinfinity · 2 points · Posted at 15:34:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I still think that people don't like newer pokemon simply because they never grew up with it. Nostalgia can make you love things the current you wouldn't be interested in.

Mastercheese274 · 2 points · Posted at 15:57:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is insane! I never could really put into words why I wasn't a fan of the new design style but I think this is it. Nice catch!

thevoize · 2 points · Posted at 17:31:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So much anger in the 90s.

Satokech · 2 points · Posted at 18:09:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now do the other 95% of all the Pokémon and see if your point still stands.

ActivateGuacamole · 2 points · Posted at 18:32:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

ITT: Cherrypicking designs from the old and new generations to make the older ones look better.

Also ITT: "Let's make all the new Pokemon look angry"

One trend that I've noticed for years is that Pokemon eyes have gotten much more diverse in design, and I think the artists have made that decision consciously. The eyes in Pokemon from the first two generations were still diverse but there were definite categories that many of them fit into. One category was the triangular eye shape with the tiny pupil, as shown in OP's cherrypicked image. Another was a large eye without any sclera, where the pupil and iris fill the entire eye. We still see stuff like this in the newer designs, but it's not as prominent.

Bpande20 · 2 points · Posted at 19:15:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never realized what it was that made them look so different. Which is weird, because I drew eyes exactly like the old Pokemon when I was younger. I thought it made all my bad characters look so badass/evil

ibreathefreedom · 2 points · Posted at 19:20:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are just becoming more domesticated with time.

yakayasub · 2 points · Posted at 19:44:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dbz style eyes

aab0908 · 2 points · Posted at 21:53:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn Moe

hanzzolo · 2 points · Posted at 22:52:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit you're right!

markk123123 · 2 points · Posted at 00:31:53 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Woah you are on to something here. You improved every new pokemon in my opinion.

joshosh34 · 2 points · Posted at 01:34:14 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy crap.......

Sirabell · 2 points · Posted at 02:19:46 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can't believe we figured it out. Is there a way we can voice this to the creators of new Pokemon?

CrazyJMiles · 2 points · Posted at 03:14:42 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

They went from badass to confused

Ca1300se_1869 · 1 points · Posted at 16:19:09 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Since the discovery of Pokemon, they have become less feral and adapted to human presence. It's been 21 years after all.

thefinalturnip · 2 points · Posted at 18:11:04 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

In other words art has developed over the past two decades and has improved and they don't copy Dragon Ball Z anymore.

Also, gen 1 had a lot of Pokemon with round eyes. This post isn't really that fair.

Seaguard5 · 1 points · Posted at 18:59:48 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

It may make no sense to you because you are likely blinded by your love of what name Nintendo attaches to a game alone. I do understand how art evolves and changes over the years and how new art styles develop.

I am also aware that beauty (or admiration) is in the eye of the beholder. Some people think "modern art" is art. Some of them simply because people call it "art" some others because they see some sort of merit in it. Is it actually? Well that depends on what the majority of people think (definition of a fact in this case) and we may never know that. You could argue that a fact is something that has to be proven but how can questions like these be proven without a doubt? They can't because they are aesthetics based solely on opinion and you may be on the other side of this belief than I and that may not change (which is fine).

So to your point that it is still Pokemon because it has "evolved" over the years, I'm not going to disagree with that (because I have nothing personally against you and am merely arguing a point) and it is your opinion and you have the right to possess it.

As I have my opinion that it is because this "evolution" is a bad and un-creative one to me. I believe that after so many years of beating the genre against a rock trying to re-invent the formula (with the relatively tight parameters that constitute Pokemon as it has been established with the original trilogy) so many times it has finally lost its identity and should just end to save face and provide some sense of proper closure and Nintendo can start fresh.

What do you think would be wrong (if you would even disagree) with just starting fresh and creating a new series that they could define anew, resetting the boundaries of what genre they want to make (that is clearly departing from the Pokemon that was defined with the trilogy)? Or even something like "final fantasy" that has no parameters that remain consistent throughout the series (they can do what they want and still call it the same series because only the name remains constant)?

And you said the old characters can't change yet you reference the changing of pikachu over the years? That contradicts itself in that pikachu has indeed changed a lot from looking a lot more like a fat mouse (not knocking the classic style just saying) to a thinner, more refined character currently.

So you have learned that art changes, as it does, but have you learned the second part of that in that all good things must end? This second "axiom" if you will, is critically important in indeed good things like, I don't know, basically everything. It makes it so things don't get toted around so long that they start to spoil and rot and become stale and bad. Sure something created changes over time but eventually it must end so the next good thing may begin anew and fresh. If you maintain that Pokemon should indeed continue then for how long? Indefinitely?

FlashFlood_29 · 4 points · Posted at 08:22:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New pokemon in general have more rounded/beveled features compred to striking features of old.

Yatagurusu · 15 points · Posted at 10:00:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not necessarily true as someone pointed out, on the right is mostly basic pokemon and on the left is mostly fully evolved pokemon. Basic pokemon are supposed to be cuter and not as intimidating, look at Gible compared to Garchomps

very_sweet_juices · 4 points · Posted at 10:49:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There is also the fact that Pokemon are now not just drawn and conceived by Ken Sugimori and Satoshi Tajiri anymore - a lot are drawn by other people trying to emulate their ideas... a lot are drawn trying to look like a Pokemon. The new guys are playing the role so a lot of Pokemon have just been flanderized. There is a pretty distinct look, aside from the eyes, of older and newer Pokemon.

Dimensional13 · 1 points · Posted at 11:12:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

However, you need to remember that Ken Sugimori is still the main art director. Every design still needs his blessing to be included into a game and is then drawn by him.

destinofiquenoite · 3 points · Posted at 11:03:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For me one of the main difference between new and old Pokemon is the color. New monsters always have too many colors, and not only that, but also too many details and uncommon colors like purple, black and brown.

Of course there are excepctions like that tiny ice bear with running nose, but you can see how its design is cleaner compared to others.

Edit: I noticed it mostly from Gen 4 onwards, as if this design was increasing in number.

Woofgangsta · 2 points · Posted at 11:42:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be fair the latest games took place in a tropical setting, so it makes sense for the Pokemon to be more colorful.

destinofiquenoite · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm talking about Gen 4 onwards, not only Gen 7.

Feminist-Gamer · 8 points · Posted at 09:32:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not just this, it's the entire anatomical structure of the design. Old pokemon designs tended to have suggested bones, muscle and general logical skeletal structure. Newer pokemon are flat stickers stuck onto round, smooth objects. For the most part anyway. All anatomical detail has been thrown out

HKBFG · 6 points · Posted at 10:48:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

THAT'S WHAT IT IS.

i couldn't place what i didn't like about the new ones, but that's it right there.

old pokemon had a third dimension,

NihilsticEgotist · 2 points · Posted at 17:09:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Diglett has best structure ever, right? Better than flat Greninja?

NEXT_VICTIM · 4 points · Posted at 10:03:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's a trend in modern anime. The new season of samurai jack does this too. There's way more of the power puff girl style wobbly round eyes than in the older episodes.

Poppin__Fresh · 5 points · Posted at 10:38:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Samurai Jack's not an anime though..

Wensdae · 1 points · Posted at 10:23:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Definitely.

maeschder · 3 points · Posted at 09:38:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old pokemon seem to have more brow ridges as well.

Also new pokemon have weird colour schemes for their eyes, like coloured sclera with white pupils (which makes no sense at all).

Tristan_Afro · 4 points · Posted at 11:01:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

> Pokémon

> sense

Top Kek

EDIT:

coloured sclera with white pupils

There are old Pokémon that have this too, some are right in the pic.

mushroom_taco · 3 points · Posted at 16:23:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

God, /r/gaming is a shithole.

ThaneWilson · 5 points · Posted at 06:50:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old looks so much better

hrehbfthbrweer · 7 points · Posted at 10:16:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I dunno, I'm happy when things don't have to look "badass" all of the time... Variety is good!

GyroGOGOZeppeli · 1 points · Posted at 10:31:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're not badass, just more wild.

Voltorb making an angry face is not badass, but it comes off as a wild animal when faced with it.

hrehbfthbrweer · 3 points · Posted at 10:38:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's funny, I never would have associated it with wide animals.

With that said, gamefreak are definitely trying to humanise pokemon more and more. They're definitely trying to distance them from pets.

GyroGOGOZeppeli · 1 points · Posted at 10:44:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've long given up on trying to figure out why I don't like the new gens as much as the old ones.

Maybe it's nostalgia, idk, but the eyes are one of the factors, not exactly a game changer to prove a point, but it helps.

hrehbfthbrweer · 1 points · Posted at 10:48:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The style has definitely changed over the years! But I do think nostalgia plays a factor too.

GyroGOGOZeppeli · 1 points · Posted at 10:56:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Was always a 2nd gen guy myself.

I've spent twice the hours playing G/S/C than R/B/Y or any other gens.

Dreaming_in_a_Coma · 4 points · Posted at 08:05:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They do. What a small change that really does leave a impact.

Memeslayer666 · 2 points · Posted at 09:07:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The new pokemon eyes are not edgy enough.

supershrewdshrew · 1 points · Posted at 10:35:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ha, literally.

aetate_divinam · 2 points · Posted at 09:33:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

By looking at that pic the newer pokemon look more like my little pony.

loganbesalke · 6 points · Posted at 06:53:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean that and they're making Pokémon out of chandeliers and what not which just doesn't appeal to me

BeefJurky · 75 points · Posted at 07:19:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

as opposed to magnets, pokeballs, and literal sludge right

2722010 · 2 points · Posted at 10:23:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokeballs tie in with lore, magnets represent a certain force of nature. Sludge is at least good variety and a good way to represent something toxic that isn't based off an animal. Wtf is a chandelier?

domeforaklondikebar · 1 points · Posted at 18:36:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A final stage version of will o' the wisp.

ADHDandMi · -12 points · Posted at 07:32:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

At least there's creativity, one Pokemon is literally garbage.

domeforaklondikebar · 39 points · Posted at 07:42:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right. They did design a Pocket Monster based on trash for the region based on New York City, a town with a huge trash problem.

noontide108 · 12 points · Posted at 09:51:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's also based on Totoro, the nature spirit from My Neighbour Totoro. But since nature has been corrupted and polluted, it represents the environment by taking on the appearance of garbage instead. Plus it's a Trubbish that got so huge and bloated that the bag tore and the spilled waste formed its evolved body, which is sick as fuck.

Garbodor is easily one of the greatest and most inspired pokemon designs. Magneton is a fun take on how electromagnetism works and Voltorb/Electrode a neat parody of RPG mimics but muk and most of gen 1-2 are incredibly bland.

ADHDandMi · -33 points · Posted at 07:44:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's nice, still isn't creative. Might as well make a puck Pokemon for when they go to Canada.

Having a bunch of magnets attached together actually has some creativity to it, a pile of slime? Awesome.

An ice cream cone and a Pokemon made of trash...... He might as well just evolve to a dumpster then a trash truck.

domeforaklondikebar · 18 points · Posted at 08:08:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Honestly, if you're being serious, then I really don't know what to tell you. The fact that it isnt a trash truck is whats more creative. Imagine a NY alley on trash day, and you're walking through there. Or maybe you're by an entrance to the sewer. It makes sense in the Pokemon world for Garbodor to be this monstrous heap that hides and feeds on the garbage problem the city has.

It's literally no different then Muk, yet Muk being a simple pile of sludge is "awesome". Black and Whitw were the first games not based on a Japanese region, so it contains many Pokemon that are analogous to older Pokemon, but with a twist to make it more fitting to Unova/NY. It's why Garbodor isnt just a pile of sludge, it's pollution that fits into a direct characteristic of the region theyre building. It's why the Conkeldur line isn't just a three stage standard fighter like Machamp. It's holding building materials to reference the skyscrapers and construction workers of NYC.

For the examples you mentioned, we wouldn't get a fat guy and a hockey puck. We'd get a Pokemon like Passimian but based on a curling or hockey player, not rugby/football. We'd get a Pokemon based on a cowboy or Sheriff for Texas. Because those are creative and match what they would do. Are Aromatisse and Slurpuff a bit on the nose? Maybe. But they're not "hockey pucks and fat guys".

If you think designing the Pokemon to look like it adapts and exists specifically in the region isnt creative, I don't know what to tell you.

Trevmiester · 41 points · Posted at 07:53:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How about a Seal named Seel?

mexicalien · 5 points · Posted at 08:33:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are getting downvoted by genwunners. That sucks because obviously there are good and bad pokémon in every generation and it's all subjective. You're totally right though... there are some extremely uncreative pokémon in Gen I and many people will defend those to the grave. Seel, Grimer/Muk, Voltorb, Ditto, Tangela, Jynx, Pidgey/Pidgeot(to), Rattata, etc., etc....

A lot of Gen I pokémon are pretty unremarkable. But they came first.

Anyone want to defend how Rattata is cool but Vanillish is dumb? Why is Fearow cool but Garbodor is dumb? Why is Goldeen cool?

TNGSystems · 10 points · Posted at 08:52:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A majority of Pokemon in Gen 1 were fighting animals. They were based around real animals, then you had a series of slightly more fantastical ones like the starter pokemon (super turtle, super chameleon, super... frog) and Pikachu, then you had more creative things like Geodude and Koffing and Tangela, then crazy fantasy things like Hitmonchan, Alakazam, Zapdos. Goofy things like Eggxecute, Voltorb, Mr. Mime etc.

That's all well and good... But I still think there's a difference between a Pokemon that's a Magnet and has steel / electric abilities and is found with Scientists, that makes sense, and a pokemon that is a Garbage bag, a lantern, and ice-cream cone, a keyring.

Ok do this for example, what shouldn't be the Pokemon here?

A goldfish
A Rhino
A Toxic rock
A pile of sludge
A Magnet

Or

A Chair
A Bookshelf
A Duvet
A Keyring
A Mug
A Garbage Bag

When you look at Magnemite, it's been designed more. You have the orb, the screws, with magnets on either side. Nothing i've ever seen before...

Whereas the Ice Cream pokemon is literally the exact shape of an Ice Cream Cone (with a blue cone admittedly) and a face where the icecream is..

http://pokejungle.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/lolscream.jpg

YouKnowEd · 4 points · Posted at 11:22:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sure theres the ice cream, but Gen one literally has some eggs next to each other. All gens have good and bad.

TNGSystems · -7 points · Posted at 11:33:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah but eggs hatch animals. I mean, it's a fucking ice cream.

Sennheisol · 0 points · Posted at 15:26:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Seriously what are these people smoking? These aren't Pokemon. This is like mylittlepokemon now :( it's sad that they can't make any good new Pokemon anymore

domeforaklondikebar · 1 points · Posted at 18:26:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I swear, can't tell if people in this thread are trolling, have shit taste, or are just making entire judgments based on seeing one damn ice cream cone, add not actually looking any deeper.

Golisopod

Tyrantrum

Toucannon

Vikavolt

Trevenant

Solgaleo

Araquanid

Haxorus

Hydrogen

Braviary, the America bird.

And Volcarona

If you seriously don't think "any" of those Pokemon are cool, I really don't know what to say.

TNGSystems · 1 points · Posted at 15:29:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There comes a point where anyone sensible just says "yeah ok it is a little dumb that there's an ice cream pokemon, it's food, no way can it be sentient.

I mean... Magnemite could be a robot... But an ice cream.. it's food.

Tensuke · 1 points · Posted at 18:14:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't bother, you're not allowed to praise Gen 1 or criticize Gen 4+ without being labeled a "genwunner" and downvoted heavily.

TNGSystems · 1 points · Posted at 18:16:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They can suck my dick.

Mendicant_ · 6 points · Posted at 09:06:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think there is something cool about a bunch of the pokemon being quite normal animals; it makes the world feel more alive, like this is a real wilderness with real-ish animals lurking there. Imo, the simple animals (Goldeen, Seel, Caterpie, etc) help create the atmosphere needed for the more 'out there' designs (Machoke, Togepi, Raichu, etc) to feel like they belong to the world, with the ones that are truly weird (Muk, Magneton, Porygon) generally being rare and difficult to find, and thus a prize worth hunting for.

There is a reason that the new Gens still make lots of fairly plain animals for the low-level pokemon encountered, but over time they have been drifting away from this strategy in favour of a higher proportion of 'gimmick' pokemon, which is a mistake imo.

Yatagurusu · 5 points · Posted at 10:07:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So you're telling me.theres something creative about taking a regular animals and items and corrupting the name slightly (pidgey, rattata? Come on they could have put a little more effort in the name).

but there's nothing cool about animating inanimate objects; recreating mythical pokemom and creating some sick shit like the Land Shark pokemon, like that shits dope af.

excellentGrammer · 1 points · Posted at 17:29:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did you know in one episode of Happy Days the Fonz literally jumps over a shark on water skis and it. Was. AMAZING

ADHDandMi · -3 points · Posted at 08:31:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You realize that's a translation issue right?

Rzx5 · 5 points · Posted at 09:59:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hold up. A lifeform emanating from an environmental problem taking place in a fictional city based off of a real city with this real problem isn't creative to you, yet all you have to say for Grimer is...Awesome? There's less creativity in Magneton.

Allevon · 2 points · Posted at 13:09:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude the ice cream cone Pokémon is fucking lit

ADHDandMi · -12 points · Posted at 07:46:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or maybe just make one Pokemon an obese guy for when they go to Texas!

supershrewdshrew · 2 points · Posted at 11:11:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What is it about literal garbage (sludge) that makes it more creative than literal garbage?

Poppin__Fresh · 1 points · Posted at 10:36:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There were multiple pokemon in Gen 1 who were literally garbage..

BlueBarren · 1 points · Posted at 12:05:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

An ice cream cone pokemon is where I draw the line. Although those Aloha versions of old pokemon are a cool idea, now that's something I can get behind.

TheForceIsWithBrew · 4 points · Posted at 06:44:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You found it

derage88 · 5 points · Posted at 06:51:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think this is why I just couldn't get into the new Pokemon games, they all seem like cute little pets where the originals (in the Blue and Gold I originally played) all seemed more like tough fighting animals.

Nerull · 5 points · Posted at 21:04:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The original starters all had big round cutsey eyes, and being obnoxiously cute was Pikachu's entire shtick. You just don't remember what the old pokemon looked like.

Yatagurusu · 1 points · Posted at 10:01:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mmmmm I always wanted me a nice cute Steam jet.

HYDN250 · 2 points · Posted at 11:12:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No one going to mention the fact that Pokemon "then" actually also looked like they could be conceivable creatures some what? I mean, sure there are a few exceptions, but I'll be damned before I consider a lamp and a fucking sand castle as a Pokemon type/species.

mclane5352 · 7 points · Posted at 11:19:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh but the magnets and rocks were okay? How about the pile of sludge or the snake whose name is just backwards snake.

Bitch all you want a out a lack of creativity and Pokémon not being believable-- they've always been that way, you're just nostalgic.

HYDN250 · 1 points · Posted at 11:30:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I said with as few exceptions. And you're Damn right, muh childhood!

DaredewilSK · 0 points · Posted at 12:02:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea sludge, snake, rock and magnets were fine. Also cow and dancing plants from Gen 2. But after that it has gone to shit. No creativity. Just random cute shit or big badass shit.

mclane5352 · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What's creative about a snake It's not even a snake-something or a re-designed snake It's literally just a snake, whose name is snake backwards

You can't complain about creativity if the basis for "good" creative monsters is as simple as half of first gen.

Don't get me wrong- I'm with ya. I think there isn't a whole lot of inspiration going into the newer gens, but how many unique monsters can YOU create?

DaredewilSK · 1 points · Posted at 12:51:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yea its a snake.. Fucking snake.. Who wouldnt want a snake fighting for him? Its simple and smart and makes sense. On the other hand behold:

Generic lion like legendary #23 http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/5/57/791Solgaleo.png/375px-791Solgaleo.png

Hoppip #2 http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/a/a1/761Bounsweet.png/375px-761Bounsweet.png

Generic pidgeon #46 http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/7/7e/661Fletchling.png/375px-661Fletchling.png

squelchy20 · 1 points · Posted at 21:51:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TBH, I think Ekans and Arbok are creative names.

Yeah, they are Snake and Kobra backwards, but actually sound good.

Better than mindless shit like Lickilicky.

rickydetx · 2 points · Posted at 11:18:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn let's complain about everything

Fuckenjames · 2 points · Posted at 11:47:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's also because they look less and less like animals.

matt-vs-internet · 2 points · Posted at 14:15:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No it's because old Pokemon were dragons and monsters. New Pokemon are chandeliers and fucking ice-cream cones.

JohnArbalete · 2 points · Posted at 18:18:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Could it be because some are garbage bags? Or ice cream cones? Or a 1 of 3 elements version of a random animal for the 50th time?

TheKuKuBananaz · 2 points · Posted at 10:31:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sooo basically the new ones look like pussies and the old ones look like badasses

Bluebe123 · 2 points · Posted at 19:40:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Uh, that's cherrypicking. I can do that, too! Compare Dragalge to Wigglytuff.

But, being fair, Pokemon aren't necessarily badass or pussyish. It's a sliding scale.

The-Leprechaun · 2 points · Posted at 10:27:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There are only 151 pokemon, i don't know what y'all are on about.

GieterHero · 3 points · Posted at 11:28:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Sennheisol · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

^ this

Bluebe123 · 1 points · Posted at 19:41:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see you have also lived in a cave for the past 20 years.

Jcaf8 · 2 points · Posted at 09:34:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it bad I can name all of these?

cheesycephalopod · 1 points · Posted at 13:49:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh my sweet summer child.

badvok666 · 3 points · Posted at 09:22:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Then look at my boy JigglyPuff

Also pikachu. Also charmander, bulbasaur and squirtle. In-fact i recon more eyes are round.

Sebbean · 3 points · Posted at 05:02:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I miss the ole poké

J3- · 1 points · Posted at 09:12:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But what about pikachu??

squelchy20 · 1 points · Posted at 10:00:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pikachu is a mouse. Mice have round, beady eyes.

_stream_line_ · 1 points · Posted at 09:16:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Finally I can die in peace

gliscor885 · 1 points · Posted at 09:21:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How you gonna do my boy Helioptile like that?

(Okay, admittedly it is kinda cutesy, but it's fitting for that Pokemon at least)

downonthesecond · 1 points · Posted at 09:22:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Only kittens and puppies should have round eyes.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:34:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, they got circles and triangles pretty much covered (and a wild hexagon or trapezoid here and there), so it's time to create square eyed pokemon.

Concordia_chaos · 1 points · Posted at 09:43:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Xpost to r/pokemon

Ychip · 1 points · Posted at 09:44:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

imo its also because there are some more complex designs compared to early pokemon often being simple shapes. Maybe because so many animals and myths have already been exhausted.

TheFissureMan · 1 points · Posted at 09:45:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You forgot the best OG Pokemon eyes.

_ _

blazing420kilk · 1 points · Posted at 09:45:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dragonite?

SirHamsterton · 1 points · Posted at 09:48:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can't even recognize half of the new ones

Etonet · 1 points · Posted at 09:53:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

ohhh, so that's the difference, of course! the left side looks more "raw"

GET_OUT_OF_MY_HEAD · 1 points · Posted at 09:55:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah, so basically modern day Pokémon are Neopets.

riderer · 1 points · Posted at 10:00:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aggressive vs cute (or little bit shady)

phforNZ · 1 points · Posted at 10:01:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Moral of the story? Consummate V's!

Malcerion · 1 points · Posted at 10:07:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also notice how much rounder most of the newer are? or circle shaped?

B0tt0 · 1 points · Posted at 10:08:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

notmypokemon

LeakyTampon · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Never realised the older ones had DBZ eyes

iDuLicious · 1 points · Posted at 10:09:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

mind = blown

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:10:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree

subbedsubs · 1 points · Posted at 10:11:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

diplomatic title of the day

ene_due_rabe · 1 points · Posted at 10:15:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My Little Pony...

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:15:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice job getting those pictures.

BeerOnTap · 1 points · Posted at 10:15:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

TIL new Pokemon have My Little Pony eyes. No wonder I've always thought that Gen 1 is best Gen.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 10:16:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I guess they think kids need things with softer edges these days.

And no Victory Road.

Bring back old pokemon eyes and Victory Road!!!

rufus10505 · 1 points · Posted at 10:48:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There aren't any main series games without Victory Road...

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 10:56:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Did you play Sun and Moon?

rufus10505 · 3 points · Posted at 11:07:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I think the better question is have you?

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 11:19:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have. And there is no true victory road. Why are you trying to jump down my throat? Did the "victory road" in sun and moon hold any of the challenge or amount of trainers that prior ones had?

Or are you going to bicker with me over a technicality? I'm looking for a proper discussion. If you're gonna whine at me that a straight line with four trainers and three pieces of grass is a victory road, and you're satisfied with that, then we have little to talk about.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I welcome constructive discussion, on the other hand.

rufus10505 · 1 points · Posted at 11:24:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I wasn't whining at you, sorry if it came out that way. Vast Poni Canyon was hardly a straight line with a few trainers. It had numerous caves and a couple of navigating puzzles. Arguably it was as difficult as some of the prior generations.

suspiciousdave · 2 points · Posted at 11:41:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, sorry. I'm so used to people jumping down my throat on here (the, have you actually played it, comment kinda got me)

I suppose you're right. My only two arguments are that, if it were victory road, it would have been named so. And that you could argue that the ocean route leading up to the waterfall in sapphire version was quite challenging and maze like sometimes, but still just a route with trainers on it, leading up to the real thing. It disappointed me is all :( would you compare it to Kanto's VR? I didn't get lost in Poni Canyon, there were perhaps two forks at most and they still lead you back to the right path, if you see what I mean.

rufus10505 · 1 points · Posted at 12:03:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see what you mean. Kanto's victory road is probably the one I've played the least, only in HeartGold. I do own Blue and Yellow on my Gameboy Color but am yet to complete them. First Victory Road I ever tried was Sinnoh's, and for some reason it wasn't that challenging, despite me thinking stupid things like a fire stone would evolve any fire Pokemon at the time lol. Anyway not sure I would compare it to Kanto's as that was one I do remember being quite hard when I played HeartGold for the first time. Once again, sorry for being a bit rude, there are a lot of genwunners in this thread and sometimes it's hard to tell the difference. Not hating on genwunners or anything, it's just they sometimes need to be put in their place.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 12:42:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I get you, and I'll tell you I have played all the main games. I like to compare and contrast constantly. Sun and moon brought some interesting features to the table but cut back at what I felt makes a pokemon game what it should be.

Some are better than others, personally I believe that Alpha/Omega are currently the best, up there with X and Y to be honest.

Sun and moon fell flat for me, just because there is little challenge and too much interruption in game play to try and put on us this story which, only in my instance, I had very little interest in.

I don't play pokemon to get frustrated and annoyed when it's brutal (it hasn't really been difficult since I was much younger) but you can definitely feel and see that they are still catering for a much younger audience, and have brought the difficulty down.

I felt there was no challenge in sun and moon and it was a shame, topped off by a lack of victory road and any real struggle for you and your team.

And no rival! Just your friend who was silly enough to choose the pokemon weakest to yours!

I could rant all day, I'll stop here for now, haha

rufus10505 · 2 points · Posted at 12:46:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lol I get you. I did feel refreshed with trials and the other new stuff. Also the soundtrack was quite good which is something really important to me, and one of the reasons gen 4 is my favourite generation. However it felt a bit like you were constantly guided through Alola, and although the characters were good, they sometimes felt a bit tacked on, and were only there for the sake of being there. I did still enjoy sun and moon and would rate it pretty high though.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 13:05:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The music was beautiful, I have to say that. The islands and the art too, and some of it was really wonderful. I really felt something when I was wondering through the volcano and the flower fields.

I just hate tutorials that hold your hand with a passion. I'm quite a free spirit I guess. I stopped playing witcher 2 because the tutorial was grueling at the beginning to me. The who leading us through was frustrating and killed a lot of the passion I had. I'd begun to explore and I just couldn't. I would begin to then be stopped and forced into another cutscene. It was a shame.

Still, the game gave my Fatty my Arcanine, I'll give it a star for that, lol.

It wasn't the worst game I've played, it really had some stellar points about it. I just hope they go back to an older way of doing the games that gives us back a bit of that freedom. I mean my boyfriends 10 year old got annoyed with all the cutscenes. That must say something, lol

rufus10505 · 2 points · Posted at 11:11:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Technically speaking, the route up Mount Lanakila is 'Victory Road', as it ends at the league. But you could also argue that Vast Poni Canyon was Victory Road, it's a large rocky route with lots of high levelled trainers that is hard to navigate, aka Victory Road. Either way, Sun and Moon definitely had a 'Victory Road' of sorts, it just wasn't called it.

suspiciousdave · 1 points · Posted at 11:17:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Of course technically, but it had none of the challenge of prior victory roads :( and no chance of getting lost. Kanto and Hoenn's victory road used to mess me up. The challenge was the fun. Sun and moon's one wasn't a true victory road. There is no victory without challenge.

Grapezard · 1 points · Posted at 10:17:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Depends on where you look. The ''angry brow'' look still exists in the newer ones, but I find them to be more varied ''angry brows''.

Here are a few that came to mind: http://imgur.com/a/dVeW3

xanyanyany · 1 points · Posted at 10:17:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
sA1atji · 1 points · Posted at 10:18:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, I've never realized that... Probably that made them look more aggressive or serious while the newer ones are just appealing to the cute-side.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:18:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The aesthetic has definitely changed but we had a lot of round-eyed pokemon back in the day too, like Squirtle, Pikachu, Raichu, Clefairy, and Jigglypuff. It is true that a lot of the new designs trend towards the cute/round aesthetic.

laz85 · 1 points · Posted at 10:19:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I could make the same picture like that but reversed for the generations when I selectively use mostly non fully evolved pokemon for one side and threatening evolved/legendady ones for the other side.

supershrewdshrew · 1 points · Posted at 10:20:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great observation; I noticed this with Vanillish but not any further. However, I would like to see someone take this a step further and categorize every generation by eye type. For instance, there are a lot of pokemon from gen 1 who have black/brown marble eyes (like Pikachu, Vulpix) yet that eye style is still fairly common.

ohmeno3 · 1 points · Posted at 10:23:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

wow new pokemon with replaced eyes actually look better

DrZeroH · 1 points · Posted at 10:30:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was about to ask for Haxorus and then realized that he is one of the few pokemon that actually has eyes more akin to the old style. No wonder I favor it so much more than the others lmao

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:33:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
RATMpatta · 1 points · Posted at 10:33:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What's the cut off point though for what is condidered old or new. Personally I'd say either gen 3 or 4 but is their a hard rule for this?

Omnievul · 1 points · Posted at 10:33:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit, I had never realized this before.

Pauliemazz · 1 points · Posted at 10:35:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes! I've been saying this for years!!!

FuriousDee · 1 points · Posted at 10:36:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Makes me think of Megaman for some reason

Viking_Mana · 1 points · Posted at 10:37:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I personally think it's more just because new Pokémon are often far more detailed and intricate in their design. The most detailed and odd ones are definitely the ones that feels the least like proper Pokémon to me.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:37:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Partially, sure. But I'm pretty sure it's more because the designs seem to be getting lazier and lazier. Less like dinosaurs and dragons and monsters and cool looking bladed or thorned "things" and instead more and more polished/smooth/reflective jelly-ish happy anthropomorphic.... "things".

That sandcastle and ice cream cone kill me inside a little. Also there are more and more re-visionings of older 'mons. At first it was throwing out over-the-top extra tiers of evolution. Now it's just flat out re-doing the original designs with a different color. Use to be if a pokemon was a different color it was a rare/shiny. Now it means it's alolan.

so-very-very · 1 points · Posted at 10:38:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New eyes look like Powder Puff girl eyes

totem56 · 1 points · Posted at 10:38:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shit, I can hear the theme song...

DoctorWaluigiTime · 1 points · Posted at 10:39:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So the old pokemon are super saiyans while the new ones aren't.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:41:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My Little Pony eyes are the new norm.

awolbob · 1 points · Posted at 10:42:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Pokemon from "Then" look like they eat the Pokemon from "Now".

DeadeyeDuncan · 1 points · Posted at 10:42:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, its because the new ones are just geometric shapes with eyes on them.

Or they just look like robots.

ValaskaReddit · 1 points · Posted at 10:44:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or uh because some are literally friggen keychains?

cardboardbuddy · 2 points · Posted at 10:55:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well Gen 1 had literal friggen magnets...

ValaskaReddit · 1 points · Posted at 11:14:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah but fucking magnets, how do they work?

snapundersteer · 1 points · Posted at 10:44:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
FlashArcher · 2 points · Posted at 10:50:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What are you doing up man

snapundersteer · 2 points · Posted at 10:51:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cats man cats doing cat things all loudly. Go to bed flash

shitty_mcfucklestick · 1 points · Posted at 10:48:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks a lot like what happened to TMNT after the mainstream market got their dirty hands on them. The original Eastman and Laird comics were pretty badass.

SHiiNZoN · 1 points · Posted at 10:55:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's my little pony

Simicrop · 1 points · Posted at 11:02:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I didn't upvote because of truth, but because the left side looked so familiar.

monotonedopplereffec · 1 points · Posted at 11:02:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The first two gens felt like they were animals in the world, with their own agendas and worries (sometimes annoyed by human interaction) while the new ones seen to just be waiting to jump into a pokeball for you

Iwillhave100burgers · 1 points · Posted at 11:03:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Bring the mad eyes back!

accountnumber3 · 1 points · Posted at 11:06:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

https://youtu.be/zCbl-12QV2c
This is my problem with gen >1. It has nothing to do with the eyes.

Pyroteq · 1 points · Posted at 11:07:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They don't look like Pokémon because they've got shit like a fucking set of keys.

The original 151 had weird shit like a bunch of magnets, but the new ones take it to the extreme.

There's a fucking ice cream pokemon. Ice cream. Why?!

cheesycephalopod · 1 points · Posted at 13:45:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah yes. Lets not forget the magnets, the mime, a literal rat, a bat, a rock with arms and eyes, a living bomb, and a frieza reject.

Pyroteq · 1 points · Posted at 10:42:38 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

You'll notice I said some of the original 151 were stupid and mentioned Magnemite.

I just think MORE of the new generation are stupid. What's next? Shoemon? A literal shoe?

I know I'm not their target audience, but I still play the games for the nostalgia trip and I cringe when I see weird inanimate objects that are now Pokemon for some reason. Like, honestly, would anyone care if these Pokemon didn't exist? I doubt it.

There's a reason people instantly think of Pikachu and Charizard when you mention Pokemon and not bloody icecreamon and fuckilostmykeysmon.

wukongnyaa · 1 points · Posted at 11:09:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

welcome to the rehash every year, release same DS 24 times for max price, furry and weeb zone modern day nintendo

-edit also another example of how people don't even understand or acknowledge how significantly influenced they are by design

Kayaleo · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Probably wrong but older eyes are harsher. They are appealing to a softer generation perhaps.

Polskidro · 1 points · Posted at 11:12:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Definitely not the reason for me.

Draken44 · 1 points · Posted at 11:12:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Age test: can you guess the Pokémon by the eyes?

(I got every one on the left column...started in Gen 1)

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:13:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mind=blown

marlo94 · 1 points · Posted at 11:14:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I first thought that the "new" were a reference to those ponies that even grown man look at.

Flarestriker · 1 points · Posted at 11:16:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Went from DBZ straight to Gravity Falls

ReadsStuff · 1 points · Posted at 11:19:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Obliterate people with fire.

defnotem · 1 points · Posted at 11:21:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're all getting same face syndrome

Karleopard · 1 points · Posted at 11:23:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Zorua's eyes look fine.

NightmarishPT · 1 points · Posted at 11:23:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This happened in dragon ball too!!

Dark_Merchant · 1 points · Posted at 11:26:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Schwarza · 1 points · Posted at 11:28:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Tell that to Poliwag

Jay794 · 1 points · Posted at 11:28:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Angry vs Cute eyes

krogan_kween · 1 points · Posted at 11:28:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hmm that is very interesting for sure. Something I've never thought of.

Garedevil · 1 points · Posted at 11:29:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit... I can't unsee this

AndersonKalista · 1 points · Posted at 11:33:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Upvote the shit out of this.

entangledvyne · 1 points · Posted at 11:33:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Plenty of old pokemon have round eyes. Plenty of new pokemon have triangle shaped eyes. You just picked out a couple that fit your argument.

Typhera · 1 points · Posted at 11:34:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Call me crazy but I prefer far more "new" pokemon than those from 1st or even 2nd gen.

I do think you are right though, the eyes change it a lot.

IMSmurf · 1 points · Posted at 11:35:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like how this was made in /vp/ to cherry pick on purpose.

hutxhy · 1 points · Posted at 11:36:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

PSbattle: Now let's see new eyes on old Pokémon.

SweelFor · 1 points · Posted at 11:37:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is actually disturbing.

dodgers129 · 1 points · Posted at 11:37:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How dare they Whitewash our Pokemon! First Ghost in the Shell and now this? We cannot just remain idle and allow this to happen! We cannot allow Scarlett Johansson stomp all over us like we are Weedles! #SaveOurPokemonFromScarlettJohansson

jtspree · 1 points · Posted at 11:39:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like the eyes on the left more. Wild and opposing Pokemon should look aggressive.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 11:41:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Pokémon look very mad because they are all angry due to the side affects the great Pokémon war had their ancestor Pokémon

Edit. Words.

guineapig_69 · 1 points · Posted at 11:43:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it's angst versus innocence. Triangular sharp ready to attack eyes versus, oh hey I'm cute let's hang out and just be cute together.

bobsizzlack · 1 points · Posted at 11:50:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

basically just use the angry eyes again

AJWinky · 1 points · Posted at 11:54:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pokemon were a lot angrier back in the day.

vertoxz · 1 points · Posted at 12:04:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Probably shifted away from more aggro looking eyes to stay kid friendly

Turak64 · 1 points · Posted at 12:05:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks softer, maybe to appeal to kids more?

IndianBrit · 2 points · Posted at 12:22:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was a kid when the old Pokémon first were out and I still I loved it.

I think you're on to something though. Perhaps to appeal to girls more? Specifically little girls. I remember in school when I was like 9 years old, it was mostly the boys that were into Pokémon.

Turak64 · 1 points · Posted at 12:32:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe... can see a bunch of PR guys in a room deciding how the round eyes will make it more marketable to younger girls or something

pandacorn_avenger · 1 points · Posted at 12:07:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But poliwag would fit in on the now side of that.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:09:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ruby/Sapphire did a great job. They had a great balance between the new and old design... They definitely let monsters be monsters. Aggron is my main man.

-GWM- · 2 points · Posted at 13:15:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Aggron is he best. Steel dinosaur? Yes please

AuraXmaster · 1 points · Posted at 12:09:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also you can even tell who designed what pokemon. Like minchino/chinchino and sylveon

GOATmar · 1 points · Posted at 12:10:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Akira Toriyama has soften the eyes of his characters too, as well as made them much skinnier.

He probably got bored of drawing the same thing a milion times, but if you're bored, draw something else then man. Hand the illustrations over to someone who is willing to continue drawing DB as we all know it. Dont just do drastic changes out of sheer boredom.

(Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru is the greatest "On Model" illustrator ever. Has confused AT, making him often question if the drawings are his or KN's. Let him do all the drawings and just focus on the story!)

porky1122 · 1 points · Posted at 12:14:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Round eye Pokémon have feelings too

GhostBeefSandwich · 1 points · Posted at 12:15:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Prepare to meet...

MR. ANGRY EYES

deathlyfringe · 1 points · Posted at 12:16:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy. Fucking. Shit.

Lurvig · 1 points · Posted at 12:21:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Artistic stylings are exclusive to different regions?

tropiusking · 1 points · Posted at 12:23:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

When you've been pointing this out for years.. i feel so justified now

Plogplast · 1 points · Posted at 12:29:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I hope at some point they could make the pokemon more diverse like the ones with slanted trangle eyes have more speed while rounder circles are deffensive and suare eyes means better attack

Eikcammailliw · 1 points · Posted at 12:30:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look like my little pony eyes

molten360 · 1 points · Posted at 12:33:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Came here to say this.....

kavatch2 · 1 points · Posted at 12:32:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Chinese vs Japanese

Hurley9009 · 1 points · Posted at 12:33:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So true. Never thought of it this way. I've been pretty critical of the last couple gen's designs and couldn't figure out why I dislikes them so much.

PineappleSlices · 1 points · Posted at 12:35:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

To be totally honest, this seems like an example of how more recent designs have improved on the art style.

A lot of the newer designs use more varied eyes (that in my opinion) have a lot more personality to them, while many of the older pokemon use the same kind of generic anime eyes.

FuckBigots5 · 1 points · Posted at 12:37:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Send this too nintendo. They need to know.

oskiwiiwii · 1 points · Posted at 12:38:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

1400+ comments. I also like this a lot.

drewjamez · 1 points · Posted at 12:39:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

wow never realised this... It makes sense why I am much better at drawing triangle cartoony eyes

kcindraagtso · 1 points · Posted at 12:42:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

SNOOOORRRRRRLLAAXXX!

Slapbox · 1 points · Posted at 12:43:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow you're spot on

W1zardKing · 1 points · Posted at 12:44:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You clearly see that Charizard is the dev's favorite, it's the only one who has some design.

Yellowchopsticks · 1 points · Posted at 12:45:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Isn't it just a polygon issue? Like how Lara Croft's boobs used to be...pointier.

Twilbs · 1 points · Posted at 12:46:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I honestly feel like it doesn't make a difference and the edits I've seen just kinda make them look worse

zynaerys · 1 points · Posted at 12:47:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Omg you have broken the code

Rosscosity · 1 points · Posted at 12:51:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit.... how did I never notice

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:55:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The new eyes look so lifeless.

AtanosIskandar · 1 points · Posted at 12:56:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow yes

danimalplanimal · 1 points · Posted at 12:57:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

yeah, all the new ones all have polywhirl eyes

zelcor · 1 points · Posted at 12:59:20 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You mean back when they couldn't render anything more than the same kind of eyes?

Black_RL · 1 points · Posted at 13:01:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Older ones look like Dragon Ball! I like them more!

RiffyDivine2 · 1 points · Posted at 13:02:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look a lot less angry and ready to beat your shit in.

ShnarlyDude · 1 points · Posted at 13:06:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow this blew my mind

bilobisuper · 1 points · Posted at 13:11:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Brilliant Tv Tropes article on the subject: American Kirby is Hardcore

_Zekken · 1 points · Posted at 13:15:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The main problem I have with new pokemon is a lot of them just start looking stupid, like they've run out of ideas and are just picking random objects to turn into pokemon (which they probably have)

However those eyes make them look so much better

dodiyabhikhu · 1 points · Posted at 13:16:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

i like pokemon

YoungChickenWilson · 1 points · Posted at 13:17:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cultural appropriation

My_Last_Username · 1 points · Posted at 13:20:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't played Pokémon since like Leaf Green, but they definitely look more like Pokémon with the old eyes to me.

Protocal_NGate · 1 points · Posted at 13:25:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good eye, remarkable find.

BackAlleyBum · 1 points · Posted at 13:26:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The worst part is when you get swept by one of those cute circle eye bastards while those mean eyed ones are first to go.

ramdiggidydass · 1 points · Posted at 13:27:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

151 FOR LIFE.

DarkLunch · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's because the first Pokemon were pissed about being forced into little balls due to slavery. Now, they're just broken and helpless to their fate. Didn't someone do a trailer for a darker live action Pokemon??

aryzee · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old Pokemon FTW!!

Sagiovanni · 1 points · Posted at 13:30:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So the new Pokes are made to look more cute? They might be trying to target different audience or maybe parents are already complaining too much about the violence and the characters have to look cuter because of that.

Guaymaster · 1 points · Posted at 13:34:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'll raise another argument: both new and old pokemon "feel" like pokemon, but Ultra Beasts actually feel otherworldly and weird, like they aren't actually pokemon.

What is it designwise that makes it so? The lack of eyes? But there are pokemon without eyes already.

Vannsback · 1 points · Posted at 13:35:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This changes everything.

ATGod · 1 points · Posted at 13:35:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think a lot of is it the old ones has literal animal counterparts, which made it easier for casuals. Some of the new ones looks super.. abstract? Idk

NeeOn_ · 1 points · Posted at 13:36:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What a difference!

alejpaz · 1 points · Posted at 13:36:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This has completely changed the way I see the newer Generations.

_tenac__23 · 1 points · Posted at 13:36:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude !! You just blew my fucking mind !!!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:36:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They took away their angry eyes!

NovaDr3amz · 1 points · Posted at 13:37:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are those my little ponies?

baxterthefuturepart2 · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If they replaced the eyes with the old school design and simplified the look of most of the new gen Pokémon they would look exactly the same

Trav_X · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Anyone else able to name all of these based on just these eye pictures?

stanthebossman · 1 points · Posted at 13:40:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Someone share this with game freak, or whoever designs the Pokemon.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:41:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

the new Pokemon look like the old Pokemon's crack baby.

yaaas8762 · 1 points · Posted at 13:41:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are the greatest human alive. Thank you for pointing this out to me. I could not shake that feeling, that feeling that something was off about the new Pokemon but I couldn't put my finger on it.

Sadsharks · 1 points · Posted at 13:41:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Edgy triangle anime eyes are the worst thing about early generations

Dropdeadjack · 1 points · Posted at 13:42:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are we sure those aren't cropped from MLP:FIM?

TheRandom6000 · 1 points · Posted at 13:43:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The new eyes look dead.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:43:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I seriously thought the "now"s were My Little Pony characters at first.

Mane-of-Zeus · 1 points · Posted at 13:44:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This makes them look better instantly. Dermatologists must hate you

supafly208 · 1 points · Posted at 13:46:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New pokemon eyes look like my little ponies' eyes

Micalas · 1 points · Posted at 13:46:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh my god, you're right

NomeNomeNoooo · 1 points · Posted at 13:47:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

me realise that the new Pokemon don't suck it's the people who draw them got replaced so they different .... Old was gold new Is shit

NomeNomeNoooo · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Cos they fucked up the eyes

Kitakitakita · 1 points · Posted at 13:47:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My favorite Pokemon has fucking gems for eyes :(

zambach · 1 points · Posted at 13:50:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is there any way to emulate the last pokemon game?

FlameShadow0 · 1 points · Posted at 13:50:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I actually never noticed this. Very solid point.

BobaLives · 1 points · Posted at 13:50:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I prefer the new ones, TBH.

rivermont · 1 points · Posted at 13:51:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're trying to target a much younger audience then before.

Sh_ec_ks · 1 points · Posted at 13:52:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sesnsitive ass eyes to accommodate our sensitive ass current world

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:52:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

...Finally, this problem has been solved!

I KNEW there was a reason why I thought the newer Pokemon didn't look like REAL Pokemon.

TheZooTrapGod · 1 points · Posted at 13:55:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I always thought I was the generation with the trash Pokémon and ice cream and stuff, was that gen 5? After that many assumed they were out of ideas, but from what I've heard the newest Pokémon are much better

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 13:56:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Honestly some of the new eyes work, but man greninja could benefit from those sick anime eyes for reals.

fitzger00 · 1 points · Posted at 13:57:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dude was right but the new pokemon are still pretty silly looking

MirageMageknight · 1 points · Posted at 13:57:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Crazy! I legitimately love the new designs with the old eyes way more than how they are now. Apparently, it is the cutesey crap that I don't care for. Love it! Well done.

Rootz-man · 1 points · Posted at 14:00:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

lol trying to make animals look less beastly

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:02:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see what you mean but a lot of the comparisons are showing pokemon that were meant to have “cute” eyes VS. “threatening” eyes. Think how different Jigglypuff would look with Charizard’s eyes. It’s part of their design to look like that. There are a good amount that could use the change, but be selective. Lycanroc looks great with Pinsir eyes because it’s meant to be fierce pokemon. There plenty that deserve their new eyes though.

TMac1128 · 1 points · Posted at 14:03:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ninja Turtles are better

TheFeaz · 1 points · Posted at 14:04:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's worth noting [not sure if anyone has yet] that this isn't just the game designs being effected. The Pokemon cartoons have also seen a pretty consistent corresponding change -- it's VERY slight in places, because you can't necessarily just redesign a person, but it's very evident in little things: the unbearable costuming; the overall lack of the angry facial expressions and yelling common in the original; the fact that Ash now looks more like Kanto-era Brock with a glandular problem....

If memory serves, the show got weirdly soft and vapid a bit before the games did, and now they're bringing the plot structure and aesthetics of the game closer to the show.

username_liets · 1 points · Posted at 14:04:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had the exact same thought! Never got around to making a post about it though...

Digletto · 1 points · Posted at 14:07:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 starters fit in the "now" category...

NobleN6 · 1 points · Posted at 14:08:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I find the old Pokemon to look a lot better. The newer ones seem to be hit or miss.

zerhio · 1 points · Posted at 14:11:25 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now I want to see first gen Pokémon with round eyes 👀

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:12:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

OMG it is the eyes.

MugiwaraLegacy · 1 points · Posted at 14:16:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

1st evo pkmns usually has cute round eyes

sweetNsour_karma · 1 points · Posted at 14:17:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought it was my little pony before reading the title.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:17:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Next alola level: same pokemon, different eyes. Nintendo make this happen please

krispness · 1 points · Posted at 14:18:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

that's a big part of it. Even if not every Pokemon scowled, the new eyes are a completely different style. Charmander had round eyes but the color and design was really nice for all the starters.

Newer designs tend to be more complex too, some might see that as a good thing but first get had some really nice simple designs and colour palettes.

PanicLiz · 1 points · Posted at 14:19:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's bc our society now has to be nice and kind and not bully others. This includes not making mean faces at children and others. Mean eyes are no longer allowed.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:20:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is mind blowing.

Why did they change the eyes in the first place?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:20:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Menacing and cool looking vs fucking power puff girls' eyes.

Peachskull97 · 1 points · Posted at 14:21:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If there was one post that Gamefreak/nintendo/the pokemon company needed to see it would be this one

Giovannnnnnnni · 1 points · Posted at 14:22:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Bees? NO! Not the bees!

Lucifer-Prime · 1 points · Posted at 14:23:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow this is it.

landong23 · 1 points · Posted at 14:28:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those are all baby Pokemon with the wonky eyes

Dr-BaconLegs · 1 points · Posted at 14:30:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Idk i like them both when we are talking about looks, i think just a feel of nostalgia will always pull me towards the first few generations (1-2) rather then the others.. I downloaded an emulator to play the newest pokemon games and I just feel so lost.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:30:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah... not everything has to be anime-like

Jeremythellama1 · 1 points · Posted at 14:30:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man I've analyzed the hell outta designs especially pocketmans and I'm glad someone else noticed the eyes. There's also Nintendo's lust for circles, curves, and abstract to the point of questionable "design" choices.

Seriously Gen 1&2 just had way more personality put into each design, all looking like, well pokemon, a new thing we never heard of till pokermans red n blur came out. When you see a pokemon, you know its a pokemon.

But after gen 1&2 I honestly have a hard time trying to figure out if its even related to nintendo and not just some crap fanart. Too focus tested designs anymore. Not enough creativity and subtle design elements to make the same thing look different.

I'm not a pokemon fan, but I can tell ya, gen 1&2 pookerdans were basically enriched personality filled creatures.

Now its all diet. And honestly I can't blame the designers. What're ya'll up to? Over a thousand? It can't be easy man. I'm speaking soley in design and not game design. Not a fan as previously stated.

SaIemKing · 1 points · Posted at 14:33:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You cracked the code!

SevaraB · 1 points · Posted at 14:34:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Am I the only one who thought Vanillite + Onyx ends up looking like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man?

AfterWorkGamez · 1 points · Posted at 14:36:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They like pussymons now

biscotte-nutella · 1 points · Posted at 14:37:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like a different artist alltogether..

Sigma6987 · 1 points · Posted at 14:37:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They really do too much in making them (the pokemon) look shallow an uninspired.

One other thing that bothered me about the design of newer pokemon was the use of tossing lines and circles on some of their bodies. Lazy as fuck.

SmackSmackk · 1 points · Posted at 14:38:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Name all the pokemons in this picture

closermind · 1 points · Posted at 14:38:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Its not just the pokemon. Ash has different eyes too in the newer episodes of the pokemon anime.

battlefrisk · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not my pokemon!

yogopig · 1 points · Posted at 14:40:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

A ip8

Play store link: Relay for reddit

pikachujpr · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Think you guys might be onto something, never even thought of it.

LadOkapi · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it has more to do with some of the newer Pokemon being literally garbage. They were really running low on ideas...

nastharl · 3 points · Posted at 14:46:43 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wheras the old pokemon were Sewage, which was far superior.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:41:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

God dammit. You're fucking right, man.

CrustyMustard · 1 points · Posted at 14:42:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean, this is cool and all, but that's really just a selection of a few of the Kanto originals. A lot of them have the "newer" style of eyes (See Squirtle, Sandshrew, Jiggly/Wigglytuff, Venomoth, Meowth, Psyduck, Poliwag/whirl, Machop, Tangela, Goldeen, Seaking, Eevee, Omanyte/star, Dratini/Dragonair/Dragonite, and Mew). I can see the want to point a finger and dramatically say "OMG THIS IS IT," but, if that's the case, almost a third of the original 151 are "not Pokemon."

Radioactive24 · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's not a new thing at all. It's been part of the aesthetic since Gen 1

Pollywag had the same eyes, JigglyPuff had them, and so did Paras, Omanyte, and Venomoth.

Plus, you also had a middle ground of non-cute, non-agressive eyes, like Charmander, Squirtle, Dratini, Eeevee, etc. Plus some other eyes that were just black dots, like Pikachu, Weedle, Seel, etc.

eyeznmind_like_hawk · 1 points · Posted at 14:44:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't think that's the reason. I think it's cuz Nintendo is running out of ideas in terms of Pokémon to create. They are also getting too childish (it's a children's thing after all, but there are adults who still love it or like it).

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:47:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh God, Pokémon have round eyes now. The SJWs are going to say it's being white washed.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:47:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What I don't like is the random rubber looking crests some of them have, like Entei.

Thatoneguy567576 · 1 points · Posted at 14:49:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Shit I never noticed this

sageadam · 1 points · Posted at 14:51:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Omfg...Pokemon Company owes you a lot of money for this discovery imo.

TouchmyGstring · 1 points · Posted at 14:51:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks OP, now I just got hit with nostalgia and must replay the first two gens. The horror!

M4DM1ND · 1 points · Posted at 14:55:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The old Pokémon look pissed

raphast · 1 points · Posted at 14:56:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Anti triangle conspiracy

Xenoblitzer · 1 points · Posted at 14:56:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I haven't even noticed the eyes have changed, now it's bothering me. ._.

Redhawkbing2 · 1 points · Posted at 14:58:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You can't lie, the old Pokémon eyes look more badass.

Pressingissues · 1 points · Posted at 14:58:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New artist who dis?

bmrunning · 1 points · Posted at 15:02:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's totally the eyes! It never occurred to me

u/NOKINOKINOKI dude check it out

Rogue_Elephant · 1 points · Posted at 15:05:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I remember when I was a little kid and I would draw monsters I made all of their eyes quadrilateral or trilateral like that! Totally didn't realize it was inspired by my favorite gameboy color game Pokemon Gold! Thanks OP this is some great OC

Rogue_Elephant · 1 points · Posted at 15:07:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also I think that might be why I like Kommo-o so much because he definitely has the throwback angry eyes

pjk922 · 1 points · Posted at 15:10:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey op I have you tagged as "from cape cod" so hello from another cape codder!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:16:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My little pokemony

hakalakalaka1 · 1 points · Posted at 15:20:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Okay but this is heavily cherry picked, there are plenty of gen 1 pokemon with round eyes and plenty of other pokemon with angular eyes.

Ludwig234 · 1 points · Posted at 15:21:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This reminds me of My little pony

caitymcg123 · 1 points · Posted at 15:23:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The new eyes remind me of My Little Pony

Uden10 · 1 points · Posted at 15:24:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm not gonna lie, Greninja looks way better with the G1 eyes.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:27:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Priorities moved from cool monsters to cute monsters

raloobs · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They had the eyes of pocket monster waiting to fight

Also when I saw a garbage bag for a Pokémon I had to draw the line lol

QuidHD · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy. Shit. You're right.

Ink-Era · 1 points · Posted at 15:28:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You've cracked the code. That's got to be it. I mean, look at the starters themselves. ... It happened it Ash too.

iBeFloe · 1 points · Posted at 15:32:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Similar to how anime eyes have changed. They all, for the most part, look the same now. wHy

scrobrojenkins · 1 points · Posted at 15:36:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

this particularly bothers me when the start to retcon the eyes of older pokemon. mewtwo definitely looked more baddass when i was growing up, and so did most of the pokemon from RBY in their original sugimori artwork

JayyDayy69 · 1 points · Posted at 15:37:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit, I didn't realize they changed the eyes! Fucking mind-blow!!!!!

jobhand · 1 points · Posted at 15:44:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a good point. I also believe that another reason for people, myself included, saying the new pokemon don't feel like old pokemon is that many, not all, of the new pokemon have a lot of unnecessary decoration to them. The way I put it, is that they feel more like digimon.

Many of the old pokemon kept it simple, while still looking like strange new creatures.

Blastoise was obviously very much a turtle but with subtle changes became a badass water shooting tank. Tauros, one of my favorites, was very much a bull, but put 3 tails on it and some gems on its forehead and you got yourself a simple but awesome pokemon. Now, while this may not stand true for all of the old pokemon, it holds for many of them.

Now looking at the new ones. You have some like Tyrantrum. He's a Rock/Dragon but really, neither of those aspects are really reflected by his appearance (being a t rex I guess kind of reflects the dragon portion). Why does he have a beard and crown, why doesn't he have boulders/rocks on him. I mean why not strip away the beard and crown and put stalagmites going down his spine and make him a slightly more earthen color? And as I said before this may not hold true for all of them. But I do think it, coupled with the eyes is a big factor as to why they just feel so different.

And this has been going on for some time I'd say as early as ruby and sapphire, maybe slightly in gold and silver but ever so slightly.

Quailman764 · 1 points · Posted at 15:49:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Why does he have a beard and crown

Because hes a Tyrant

jobhand · 1 points · Posted at 15:58:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fair enough. I still think that's a bit of an odd correlation and theme for a pokemon and think he still could be themed closer to his types. I mean you could do a rock beard and crown. But as I meant to state in my last post, it could be me being biased.

But thank you for the correction.

Quailman764 · 1 points · Posted at 16:06:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No problem, if you're interested heres the rest of the name meanings:

Tyrunt (Tyrannosaurus Rex, Tyrant, Runt)
Tyrantrum (Tyrannosaurus Rex, Tyrant, Tantrum)

Also Rex means King in Latin So its really multi layered, I love the naming and design, but I get what you mean with him not really matching the rock typing. I can dig the dragon/Dino link though.

wachewkoo · 1 points · Posted at 15:45:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great example of how the design language has changed. The old Pokemon actually looked like they were based on animals while the news ones are so round and bubbly, and much less intimidating (and harder to take them seriously).

n1n384ll · 1 points · Posted at 15:46:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I drew those triangle eyes on pretty much anything I drew as a kid.

NoBullet · 1 points · Posted at 15:50:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So all that hate over American versions of box art changing eyes to make them look angrier actually does look better. It's like marketers know their demographics and stuff...

NightFury999 · 1 points · Posted at 15:57:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

older Pokemon look like they had seen some shit, and tbh I like the older eyes xD

Schitzmered · 1 points · Posted at 16:03:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Akira Toriyama called Nintendo asking for his eyes back.

Aurorabeamblast · 1 points · Posted at 16:03:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They're called "Pocket Monsters", not "Pocket Creatures". The Pokemon Company screwed up in catering to SJW demands.

Viva_La_Reddit · 1 points · Posted at 16:08:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It went from tiny ferocious beast to a bunch of over sensitive my little pony knock offs. Pokemon is far from what it used to be

treemister1 · 1 points · Posted at 16:10:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This also goes for most anime in general i think.

Djaynes55 · 1 points · Posted at 16:16:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No joke I looked at the image before reading the title and thought that it was Pokémon vs My Little Pony....

TheWombatFromHell · 1 points · Posted at 16:17:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just think the new pokemon look incredible stupid and childish.

graceandwildflowers · 1 points · Posted at 16:18:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is one of the best posts I've ever seen on Reddit.

FourArmz · 1 points · Posted at 16:18:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

woah I could never put my finger on it exactly but this is what has been bugging me.

ScarletSpider2149 · 1 points · Posted at 16:23:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Pretty much like dragon ball supers art style compared to z's

bassturducken54 · 1 points · Posted at 16:23:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The eyes really do make a difference in the feel of the pokemon. I understand that they might not want to do the same thing over and over again, but it just looks appropriate.

Raceface53 · 1 points · Posted at 16:29:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree, they are more "cute" or "kawaii" looking now with the eyes.

threep03k64 · 1 points · Posted at 16:35:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Many people have made the point that the Pokemon used in OP's image have been cherry picked to prove his point and that many Pokemon from previous generations have rounder eyes (and vice versa).

With this in mind I'd be interesting in seeing if there is a link between eye shape and the popularity of Pokemon (whilst also taking into account evolution stages etc). Because whilst many Pokemon in older generations do have rounder eyes I think those eyes are often less cute. Personally at least I prefer the eyes of older gen Pokemon, and alongside how busy some newer Pokemon look I think it is a bit reason I prefer Gen 1-3 designs as a whole. I do like a lot of the newer designs still however.

Hawkshadow741 · 1 points · Posted at 16:53:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So when is someone gonna go back and give the 700+ newer pokemon evil angry eyes?

darkspine509 · 1 points · Posted at 16:56:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think this is actually a really good point. I honestly love Pokémon from the very first gen to the present, and the triangular eyes and smaller pupils on a lot of the Pokémon was certainly a distinct look earlier on

ArtistCook · 1 points · Posted at 17:00:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow! I never realized that before!!

punkhobo · 1 points · Posted at 17:06:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Zekrom , reshiram, arceus. Their forms don't necessarily jump out as one specific thing.

Backtothebacklash · 1 points · Posted at 17:07:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit.

Roadwarriordude · 1 points · Posted at 17:51:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

All I see with the newer generations is neopets.

Rustythepipe · 1 points · Posted at 18:14:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Why would they ever make such a drastic design change? Shows do that all the time and it's like they either don't care about original fans, or they think nobody is gonna notice.

Yakkahboo · 1 points · Posted at 18:18:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How dare you say Inkay is not a pokemon. Dont think I dont see it at the bottom right...

Rustythepipe · 1 points · Posted at 18:21:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now they just look like any other anime "pet" thing.

alternatexplanation · 1 points · Posted at 18:25:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are 100 percent correct. I couldn't put my finger on it before but that is totally it

SupremeDesigner · 1 points · Posted at 18:44:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Congrats! your post is in the top 10 of the day on all.

Comeonjeffrey0193 · 1 points · Posted at 18:59:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I swear to god i thought the new eyes were the eyes from my little pony

hef9800 · 1 points · Posted at 19:14:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But a lot of old pokemon had the round eyes too

vampzzy · 1 points · Posted at 19:32:56 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow

zebry13 · 1 points · Posted at 20:28:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Man, they're even white washing Pokemon now.

pakarne · 1 points · Posted at 20:41:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Staywoke

Disckize · 1 points · Posted at 21:04:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it bad that I can name the Pokémon just off of those eye pics? Lol

timeroamer2112 · 1 points · Posted at 22:15:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I bet you could make a strong case for genetic modding in Pokemon, as the Mew genome shows significant curving around the eye. Some might say that Team Rocket, in attempting to create an ideal Pokemon with Mewtwo, may have used human genomes in conjunction with Mew's genes (Mew eyes here:). If we are then to assume that other sectors of the Pokemon canon are unaffected by Gene modding, then the more curved eyes seem more natural in keeping with The O.G. Pokemon. Maybe Pokemon have only existed long enough for there to be someone there to create them and in turn beget them.

Then again, maybe Mew isn't the original Pokemon and it's all relative.

Sigourn · 1 points · Posted at 22:37:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My mind was blown out of this fucking galaxy.

EDIT:

Complainers gonna complain, I guess. I think the right image would be much more appropiate without the Poliwag-styled eyes. Because in all honesty the rest of those eyes are something much newer that wasn't seen before. Poliwag style of eyes isn't a bad thing by itself, they are actually nice. But like with every Pokémon, it has a lot to do with the entire design and not just cherry-picked parts.

WugOverlord · 1 points · Posted at 23:52:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

now someone photoshop all the new pokemon with the old-style eyes for comparison

Shortfuzd · 1 points · Posted at 00:38:22 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Jigglypuff would disagree

bigdoghogfrog · 1 points · Posted at 01:11:34 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

The old ones look determined and mean and aggressive. The new ones literally looks soulless and more like orbs than eyes.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 02:19:57 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

thefinalturnip · 2 points · Posted at 18:16:00 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

A ghost possessed sand castle? Bad ass if you ask me, especially what it does to Pokemon an people. And here's one for ya. Voltorb, not an animal. Magnemite, not an animal. Electebuzz, doesn't look like any particular animal to me. Ditto, a mass of puddy.

The Pokemon world is a fantasy world set in some future. Pokemon don't have to all be based off of animals. Originally Pokemon was created by Satoshi's love for bug collecting. It would make sense for the first set to mostly resemble animals but sooner or later the imagination has to kick in and make more interesting things for an interesting world that is nothing like ours.

Elekid is based off of a plug. Adorable as fuck though.

95DemonEarth · 1 points · Posted at 03:03:52 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I am shocked to realize the eyes are simply why I miss the old gen. Some design styles too but seeing the eyes changed the old ones makes me interested in them. Wierd...

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:09:44 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy fuck you're onto something. They look so much better with the old eyes. Nintendo went for the cutesy shit and fucked em up. :(

thefinalturnip · 2 points · Posted at 18:11:38 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Maybe because... Pokemon is for children? Cutsey seems like the right choice.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:29:27 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hardly. People still play it in their 20's. Its like saying Star Wars or X-Men, etc. are for children because the generation they came out in they targeted children. Guess what? Those children grew older but most still enjoy those things.

thefinalturnip · 2 points · Posted at 20:00:47 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

Correct. Not saying anything against that. I'm 27 and I still play and love Pokemon. But let's face it, we're NOT the target demographic just because we play it. And most comics have grown with their audience and they get more violent and gritty. Pokemon doesn't do that. It was for kids back in the 90s and is still for kids today in 2017. Tendencies change. What sold in the 90s doesn't sell in the 2000s. Not generally speaking. People still buy vintage shit but if you're going to be selling a franchise the franchise has to adapt to new tendencies and new generations of society.

People as a whole change for better or for worse and the market does, too. We still play but children today think and are different from when we were children. People are also more sensitive to bullshit. These are all clear indications that products need to change along with the people if they want to sell.

Pokemon is no different.

Remember all those great cartoons we used to watch? Have you not yet realized cartoons today don't even come close to being as great as they were back then? It's not because we grew older. It's because the tendencies change. Our cartoons wouldn't sell today. They wouldn't profit and they would cause so much outrage. They may still rerun them now and then but at this point they don't generate revenues.

Pokemon had to do the same. It's what I'm getting at. Pokemon needed to update it's designs to reflect today's children. Even if we, the old fans, don't agree with it. Also we need to keep in mind that art changes over the years. The artists improve and it's also not one single artists job anymore to create Pokemon. They have teams of people for that and they all submit different art styles.

It's not anymore about what's better or worse. They're all good. It's all about what attracts their target audience. Not you. Not me. Not 95% of this sub.

DisavowedTheDivision · 1 points · Posted at 09:31:07 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

They look more Kawaii now....

horyo · 1 points · Posted at 14:53:33 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

What about Pikachu?

NightmareMoon32 · 1 points · Posted at 03:27:03 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Zorua's eye still looks semi-menacing.

alxEros · 1 points · Posted at 05:09:07 on April 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

Where the old one 'too aggressive"?

Plasmabat · 1 points · Posted at 06:46:47 on April 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

Old eyes:good for big strong Godzilla mother fucker Pokemon /angry Pokemon New eyes:good for cute Pokemon

So use different kinds of designs to communicate different things. I never got hoe some people hate all the new Pokemon, there are definitely some dumb ones, but there were dumb Pokemon in gen 1 too.

SleuthMechanism · 1 points · Posted at 17:35:26 on April 15, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like how this chery picks it's examples and doesn't take into account all the round eyes in gen 1 and some of the more "DBZ-like" eyes on certain mons in later gens. i can see your overarching point though since overall the current art style looks much softer than the old which had a sketchier quality to it i like more.

Re1oad · 1 points · Posted at 16:16:08 on April 16, 2017 · (Permalink)

it's more the angle of the eyebrow than the eye design itself that would indicate aggression or menace.

McJubal · 1 points · Posted at 07:25:36 on April 29, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for finally answering this question i always needed answered but never knew to ask

Pierre10900 · 1 points · Posted at 21:25:09 on August 10, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree

Valeddy · 1 points · Posted at 00:36:34 on August 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Outcast_LG · 1 points · Posted at 16:42:36 on September 20, 2017 · (Permalink)

This post makes a point but doesn't have all the available evidence. Every gen has this problem.

maxxers9119 · 1 points · Posted at 00:22:01 on September 26, 2017 · (Permalink)

I also think it’s more people are under the assumption that Pokémon are supposed to represent animals. They forget that they are monsters.

joaoleites · 1 points · Posted at 17:47:05 on October 1, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it has to do with the budget that was being directed to the design of the series, as well as the recent development in computer designed artwork, as compared to drawn artwork, which was the only way to animate back when the series debutted

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 09:42:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's also partly the design in general. Gen 1 was almost completely creatures, or at the very least natural things like plants. I'd also give ghosts and dark pokemon a pass since you could argue that these "haunt" an object rather than being one. There were two types of material pokemon, which were magnemite and voltorb, plus evolutions. In fact, it takes two gens before a new object-inspired pokemon is introduced; gen 3's Chimeco, which is a wind chime with eyes. Still, this one looks more like a creature than an object, so it barely bothers me. Gen 4 gets Beldum plus its evolutions, and honestly I'm not sure what this pokemon is. Again, it's one pokemon in a generation.

And then there's gen 5 and beyond. Ice cream pokemon. Flying gear pokemon. A literal fucking chandelier. Further ahead, there's hovering medieval weapons, animated keychains and necklaces, and even sandcastles.

I like most of the new Pokemon, but each new gen introduces ten ridiculous ones and that's what I personally cannot stand.

And well... I guess the eyes are a good point. Maybe it's the attitude of the series that has changed as well?

zenverak · 5 points · Posted at 09:44:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very few are truly ridiculous if you actually look at why they exist. No more than say a floating magnet or a ball that explodes

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 09:49:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

As I said, the material pokemon in the first gens bugged me too.

But even then they were somewhat real; magnets banding together? Sure. Sentient pokeballs? Eh... well pokeballs aren't exactly "normal". They trap something huge in a tiny object. That shouldn't be possible. If there's one object that gets a pass, it's the pokeball.

But ice cream? My problem with this pokemon is that it's silly, random even. Sure, random pokemon can exist, but if ice cream gets to be alive, why aren't hamburgers alive? If chandeliers can fly, why not chimneys? My point is that if you turn basic objects into pokemon, you make pokemon less special. It's why I excluded all robot pokemon from my list, even though they obviously aren't based on creatures or plants; they're so unique that it doesn't feel wrong for them to be special like that.

RegalKillager · 4 points · Posted at 10:17:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But ice cream? My problem with this pokemon is that it's silly, random even. Sure, random pokemon can exist, but if ice cream gets to be alive, why aren't hamburgers alive? If chandeliers can fly, why not chimneys?

I think someone needs to make a distinction here between inanimate objects spontaneously becoming sentient, animate beings using inanimate objects as shells or tools (e.g. Yamask), animate beings directly possessing inanimate objects (e.g. Rotom forms), and animate beings who just happen to intentionally take on the appearance of regularly inanimate objects (Chandelure or Palossand though the Palossand line actually possesses things to have them build more sand around them - debatably settling them into both this category and the one I put Yamask in).

the ones people seem to have the biggest problem with are in the last category, regardless of how much weight is attached to it. i, for one, don't mind, because i can separate 'based on x' from 'literally x'.

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 10:25:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's just a poor excuse. People make these pokemon. They make about 100 pokemon based on animals, plus a couple dozen based on nature, and then a handful that are for some reason common objects. If it were realistic, lots of pokemon would be mimic pokemon, taking over or shaping themselves into common objects, but that's not the case. We've got ice cream, key chain, and a chandelier. You can't seriously tell me that those are the first things you think of when someone asks you how you'd camouflage yourself. (Edit: I take that back. The chandelier is actually excellent since that pokemon haunts spooky mansions. The other two aren't, though)

Fact is that they for some reason choose to include several pokemon per generation that simply don't fit. As I said in my first comment, it's sorta okay if they do it with ghost pokemon and perhaps pokemon like Rotom that take over objects, but when a pokemon shapes himself to be like a common object it should be something that makes sense.

Yatagurusu · 0 points · Posted at 10:13:37 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because it isn't literally an icecream, the idea is in the pokemom universe, Icecream is actually based on the vanilite line. Vanilite itself is an ice body with a snow head, not a literal icecream. And again, gen 5 was supposed to be remaking gen 1 pokemon to a New York theme which I think is cool as hell. I personally didn't notice it until some gentleman up there in the comments pointed out, but I'm already fond of that idea.

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 10:17:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, an ice body shaped like an ice cream cup. Don't make up excuses, it was always meant to be ice cream.

Gotta agree with you that the transition to new areas coinciding with different real-world cities is awesome, though. Still, they can do that perfectly well without any of the silly pokemon.

Yatagurusu · 0 points · Posted at 10:31:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, no they can't. Some pokemon are there for comedy or gimmick. I'm not denying that it looked like an ice cream. It isn't an ice cream though, and it's a fun gimmick saying 'actually ice creams are based off this pokemon in this regiom' there are plenty of pokemon just there for comedy. Mr. Mime, Magikarp and I'm sure gen 1 Golbat fits here as well.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:34:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Those last three pokemon are based on creatures, and yet they're silly when comedic relief is needed. So basically you just proved my point; that silly ones like ice cream and key chain pokemon aren't needed.

Tristan_Afro · 1 points · Posted at 11:25:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You have your Gens wrong. Beldum is Gen 3. Sinnoh is Gen 4. Vanillite line, Klink line, and Chandelure are Gen 5.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 12:21:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks! I'll change it to the right numbers.

koreanwizard · -1 points · Posted at 09:24:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Holy shit, that's definitely it. I don't want to make the new pokemon fight each other, that just seems cruel. These things look like anime childrens toys... Maybe I just outgrew it?

arnold_101 · 1 points · Posted at 10:04:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

agressive hence "wild pokemons"... the new ones look like umi zumi bullshit...

axbu89 · 2 points · Posted at 12:19:55 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Gen 1 ftw

braunsben · -19 points · Posted at 05:05:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can we all just agree pure gen 1 is the best

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 08:43:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I preferred second or third.

Sennheisol · 3 points · Posted at 15:29:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's nothing to agree on xD When you have a literal fucking ice cream cone as a "Pokemon" your gen sucks.

THCW · 20 points · Posted at 05:37:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No because we're not blind genwunners. Later gens have some fucking cool pokemon.

Shiner00 · 12 points · Posted at 05:54:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hell yeah I love the Coffin pokemon in Black and White games. Thought he was the coolest looking pokemon so I used him all the time.

XxGardeniaxX · 6 points · Posted at 07:23:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed, one of my all time favorites (Volcarona) is in black and white. I loved mine and it had great stats. Plus it looked really cool.

[deleted] · -3 points · Posted at 09:35:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Grow up LUL

Every_Geth · 2 points · Posted at 08:46:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

We can

Skyshrim · 2 points · Posted at 06:28:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hey, stop hogging all the downvotes!

I completely agree though, most of the later pokemon just don't fit the style correctly.

braunsben · 1 points · Posted at 12:33:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yah I guess I don't mind the second or third gen either but gen one is just so pure

HeyKid_HelpComputer · 1 points · Posted at 09:53:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The first gen Pokémon were simple in design in line work. And a basic concept of usually something like an animal and an element. Fire salamander, water turtle, electric bird. Now they have things that you really can't tell what they are supposed to be with hard lines and complicated designs.

Examples would be these new legendary Pokémon from the latest set

http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/thumb/4/44/800Necrozma.png/1200px-800Necrozma.png

http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/upload/8/89/797Celesteela.png

One has such hard straight lines. The other a lot if detail and segments to it lacking in the original gen completely. Not to mention it's hard to tell what they even are supposed to be

Norkles · 3 points · Posted at 12:03:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You do know that's the point, right? These are Ultra Beasts, which are alien and weird and are from a different dimension. They're supposed to be incredibly un-Pokémon like on purpose, because they're the Pokémon equivilant of eldritch abominations

Gooeyguy188 · 3 points · Posted at 10:12:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The first one is a light reflecting prism, it's going to be angular and black and all that; second one is a literal alien, it's going to be out-of-this-world design to drive the point across.

HKBFG · 1 points · Posted at 10:58:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

what are they supposed to be?

Yosoparletheshishi · 3 points · Posted at 11:12:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The first one is an alien light reflecting prism. The second one is an alien bamboo tree jet princess based on some Japanese lore.

They're both technically part of the species of Pokemon from Ultra Space, which are meant to be super weird (like so), but the first one is supposed to look like a Pokemon due to its time in the "normal" world.

HKBFG · 1 points · Posted at 20:52:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

at some point they all stopped looking like pokemon.

Yosoparletheshishi · 2 points · Posted at 20:54:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If the majority of Pokemon don't look like Pokemon, is what you call Pokemon really Pokemon?

HKBFG · 1 points · Posted at 20:56:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

yes.

at some point, there was a consistent concept and high quality art for these things. now there isn't.

Yosoparletheshishi · 2 points · Posted at 21:02:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There isn't a consistent concept, but I don't see how that's bad.

Let's do this. Since the majority of these so called low quality art projects are what is currently known as Pokemon, then let's just find another name for the old Pokemon because, apparently, they're not what Pokemon are anymore. Words can change, after all.

HKBFG · 1 points · Posted at 21:06:05 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

nobody is going to stop calling either of them pokemon.

it's just a shame that the quality isn't there anymore.

Yosoparletheshishi · 1 points · Posted at 21:10:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Matter of opinion, I guess.

GyroGOGOZeppeli · 1 points · Posted at 10:25:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

FINALLY!

I've always been a fan of the old gen because the new one just feels so...un-Pokemon.

You made me realize that a big part of it is the eyes. The old one had these kind of challenging eyes but also has variety like Pikachu having mouse eyes or Venonat just being bug-eyed while the new ones are mostly designed to be cute.

Not saying all new gens are shit designs because that's totally wrong, I like Litten's evolution line, but just a majority feels unappealing to me and feels Yokai Watch-ish? If that makes sense.

faustrex · 1 points · Posted at 13:10:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My biggest problem was always that they obviously ran out of ideas. I stopped playing Pokemon Black cold when I ran into a pokemon shaped like a vanilla ice cream.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 13:13:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

Evilaussie93 · 2 points · Posted at 13:14:53 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Washing machine? As in rotom wash? That came before both vanillite and klefki

faustrex · 1 points · Posted at 13:28:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Are they just looking around their offices and concepting designs based on shit near their desks?

Since I'm bitching about Pokemon designs, I haven't liked a starting pokemon since Gen 3, either. This most recent batch is just gross.

MATACORPSE · 1 points · Posted at 07:29:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think it helps with imagining each region.

S-BRO · 1 points · Posted at 08:12:22 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never noticed!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 09:28:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

In addition to eye shape, it seems like older Pokemon tend to have simpler designs, which makes them feel more distinct. These factors, along with a bit of nostalgia, are probably why people complain about the designs of Pokemon past the third generation or so.

somanyroads · 1 points · Posted at 09:32:24 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New stuff is definitely giving me a MLP vibe...yeesh

Sedax · 1 points · Posted at 09:44:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's just stupid, they're all different creatures from across the world why would they all have the same shape for eyes?

Disgruntled__Goat · 1 points · Posted at 10:04:09 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sylveon is the worst for this. All the Eeveelutions have realistic, small dark eyes. Sylveon? NOPE, let's give it gigantic bright blue eyes.

Poppin__Fresh · 6 points · Posted at 10:41:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because fuck variety. The pokemon specifically themed around extravagance should look like all the other forms.

Disgruntled__Goat · 1 points · Posted at 10:47:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Extravagance has nothing to do with giant eyes.

Poppin__Fresh · 1 points · Posted at 10:55:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're kidding, right?

Disgruntled__Goat · 1 points · Posted at 12:43:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Care to explain?

Poppin__Fresh · 1 points · Posted at 12:55:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

extravagance

ɪkˈstravəɡ(ə)ns,ɛkˈstravəɡ(ə)ns/

noun

excessive elaboration. "the extravagance of the decor" synonyms: ornateness, elaborateness, decoration, embellishment, adornment, ornamentation, showiness;

Disgruntled__Goat · 1 points · Posted at 13:06:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Again, that's nothing to do with giant eyes. They are not "ornate" or "showy". The whole of the rest of Sylveon is plenty extravagant.

supershrewdshrew · 3 points · Posted at 11:06:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Agreed. I wish when old pokemon got new evolutions, they would try more to keep the style and details consistent with the previous ones. Because at that point, people have already become fans of the as-is evolutionary line for what it was, in contrast to if they were all released at the same time.

Other examples are:

  • Although I love them, the other eeveelutions not having elemental-inspired collars (think Jolteon's neck spikes, Vaporeon's neckfins, and Flareons puff of fire-shaped fur) was also an inconsitent. Ironically, Sylveon having a ribbon necktie was consistent with the original 4 eeveelutions in this regard.
  • Elekid and Electabuzz have those triangle white eyes, yet Electivire suddenly gets marble eyes.
  • Tangela had tons of detail in each one of its vines being drawn out, yet Tangrowth loses all that detail.
  • Rhyhorn, Rhydon have very shapely skulls, yet Rhyperior's skull is just a circle.
  • Same with Lickitung. It used to look reptilian with how its skull curved. Now Lickilicky is just a blob. Not to mention it incorporated anthro features, resembling wearing clothes and hair.
  • Venusaur had very detailed and realistic tiny spots on its petals. Mega Venusaur just has a singular large, cartoonish spot on each petal.
  • Mewtwo's skull curvature, collarbone, spine, and fingers all portrayed had an unsettling realness to them, communicating how it was something slightly uncanny-valley and frankensteinesque. Mewtwo-Y becomes streamlined, smooth, and big-eyed and forgoes everything unsettling about it. *I'll probably lose a lot of you on this one, but fan favorite Scizor gives up a lot of what made Scyther what it was. Smoothes away all the animalistic curvature of Scyther's skull, jaw, teeth, feet, and aggressive eyes, and trades them all away for smoothness.
adozu · 1 points · Posted at 10:44:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

well you know, fairy.

PapiSlayerGTX · 1 points · Posted at 10:11:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

It was probably done in an attempt to "westernize" the looks of the Pokémon. Kinda killed it IMO, the old eyes look like those Pokémon KNOW there gonna kick your ass.

ZainTheOne · 1 points · Posted at 10:28:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That moment when you can identify all Pokemons on the left just by their eyes...

Jegan237 · 1 points · Posted at 10:45:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow. I honestly wish there was a way to make money off this skill.

BrosenkranzKeef · 1 points · Posted at 10:47:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Dang, I feel you.

Old Pokémon were made for battle. New ones, like, they're cute babies wtf. Nobody wants cute babies.

Dimensional13 · 3 points · Posted at 11:12:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Somewhere a Jigglypuff is crying.

na5er · 1 points · Posted at 11:00:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Is it weird that i know the old pokemons just from their eyes

bloodyseamonster · 1 points · Posted at 11:00:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The old Pokemon were more like tamed monsters, and the new ones are more like pets when you look at the semi-menacing vs the round eyes.

sh0rtb0x · 1 points · Posted at 11:02:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Never thought of that before

afbrh · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They went from DBZ to Sailor Moon.

Ryzasu · 1 points · Posted at 11:10:21 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The main reason is the human attributes and the excessive patterns on their bodies (for example Emboar) IMO

dauntless26 · 1 points · Posted at 11:11:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The used to look ready to fight. Now they look ready to cuddle.

DuttyMaltese · 1 points · Posted at 11:20:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's seven generations of inbreeding for ya'.

RykooLmao · 1 points · Posted at 11:23:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I gotta admit, the soft circle eyes make the new Pokemon look soft.

MyRealName_ISwear · 1 points · Posted at 11:29:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They lost the "monster" in "pocket-monster"

MAP868 · 1 points · Posted at 11:32:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or simply that alot of new pokemon are abstract pieces of garbage as compared to old pokemon that were SIMILAR to real world animals.

jtoppings95 · 2 points · Posted at 11:33:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or in garbadoors case, literal garbage...

kazog · 1 points · Posted at 11:36:41 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

YES! That is what has been bugging me all this time! I couldnt put my finger on it.

Lobos1988 · 1 points · Posted at 11:41:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not the eyes. It is the 'take a random object and make a pokemon out of it no matter how ridiculous' mentality.

CaptainPigtails · 2 points · Posted at 13:01:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

How many times does someone have to go over this? How is an ice cream cone, sand castle, or key chain anymore ridiculous then a red and white ball, some magnets, or floating rock #4.

Lobos1988 · 1 points · Posted at 14:15:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You can go over it as much as you want. Some shitty first generation pokemon don't excuse an avalanche of new equally shitty ones.

Hydrottiesalt · 1 points · Posted at 11:49:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Poliwhirl is the first one I think of when you pointed out the eyes thing.

AquaticBotheringFool · 1 points · Posted at 12:04:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought it was because people wanted to feel like they're life-long fans of a series that they actually abandoned 1/7th of the way through.

r134983572 · 1 points · Posted at 12:27:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like that you start your title with a compliment to both parties that you will criticize. Helps get a more positive outcome on your post. Even got yourself a gold.... nice. I got my eyes on you, you dumb redditor

FluoriteOnyx · 1 points · Posted at 12:28:13 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can't say I agree with this fully - there are plenty of exceptions to both, and if you actually compare Pokémon of similar evolution stages, it's pretty easy to eliminate this difference. Venusaur, Butterfree, Beedrill, Raichu, Clefable, Wigglytuff, Golbat, Parasect, Dugtrio, Poliwrath... Liepard, Zoroark, Barbaracle on the other side. In fact, most new eyes still include straight lines on the outer edge and most early eyes include circles for irises; it's just that the iris is smaller or bigger or a specific color in the examples that were cherry-picked so some of the new designs shown here make you notice that and some of the old designs shown here make it less prominent. But for all of the complaints talking about cherry-picking, I do see logic in this and it's actually a pretty neat observation, and I'll explain my thoughts on this specifically a bit later!

But actually, I wrote a post a while back on my own thoughts on the difference between old and new Pokémon, and since it's relevant here, this is what I came up with:

[...] I wouldn't say simple (a common complaint is that they're "running out of ideas and starting to overdesign," and, indeed, I do see some shift in complexity), but they're more visibly made of basic shapes, and "segmented" in some ways obvious and some ways subtle.

This is a design choice I really like, and one of my favorite things about all of the spinoffs, manga and anime seasons is seeing how all of the older designs grow. Pikachu, for example... if you look at, say, Bulbagarden Archives - alllll of the pictures of Pikachu - or even compare its sprites through the Generations - not just first Gen to now, because everyone knows first Gen sprites were very inaccurate, but just the gradual steps - you'll see that its design is actually quite different and has been adapted over time. As a matter of fact, I quite dislike its 3DS model for not really showing this, but as far as artwork (on Global Link, for instance), I really love its current design, especially its rounded head. Have you seen the first episode of Pokémon Generations? That's my favorite design of Pikachu. I can say this because there's a difference between that representation and its Generation IV design and its Generation I design and its main anime design and its model in the 3DS games... you get the point. And amidst all of the people clamoring about how they miss the good old days with sprites because of the art style, here I am, missing the same sprites... not because of the art style, but because those changed every Generation, while the models stay the same and can't develop along with the designs any more.

[...]

I actually think it's because of the change in clarity - the shift to building off of basic shapes - that the "new" designs are so divisive. Everyone gasps at the ridiculous Genwunners neglecting that Grimer, the pile of sludge, is just as bad as Trubbish (actuallyIdokindoflikeTrubbishanyway). But I don't think that's the point - they don't think Generation I's designs are really creative, or really unique, but after studying all of the canon designs, I do have to concede that they're a lot more dynamic. Trubbish is clearly designed, well-structured and distinctly shaped; Grimer is more amorphous, and while it's a lot more bland, it still manages some amount of character just by reshaping itself. There is a certain lack of clarity in Generation I's designs that seems to add to their charm for many. Something I've seen brought up a few times as part of the appeal of the oldest sprites: "they left more to the imagination." I can certainly see this - that's not my preference, because I like the attentive, shape-oriented designs, but whether one likes it or not, it's actually pretty easy to see. Take Koffing, for example - its skull pattern changed position early on. Pidgeot - its tail changed several times in the first few Generations and I'm pretty sure nobody cared. Golbat - I don't even see that prominent tongue any more. Haunter - its hands have changed numbers of fingers in different sprites (... also, its entire design is different from in Generation I). There are a lot of things about the earliest designs that were just not important, and they were left vague and inconsistent, and you were free to reimagine them, and Game Freak was free to mess around with them, and a lot of people loved it. Indeed, "they were left to the imagination."

Some of Alola's designs have much more of a Generation I feeling to them. Salandit, for example, is clearly not as segmented or as detailed as newer designs, but quite flexible and lithe - it would fit in perfectly with Generation I's Poison-types, in my opinion. Mimikyu's shadowy points under its costume have little reason to be consistent or exact, and the face on its costume is clearly scribbled on; there's supposed to be variance in its case because different Mimikyu make different costumes. Popplio is incredibly fluid and you can draw it several different ways, and Drampa is really puffy, curvy and soft-edged. But there are also designs like the tapu, the Ultra Beasts, Decidueye, Mudsdale... These designs seem to fit in less with the "good old days" and are a lot more precise.

[...]

[The thread author to whom I was responding had mentioned liking Talonflame.] Talonflame is one of my personal less-preferred designs, because of its more squat shape, "needless" details like the wide spot marks on its wings, and the lack of clarity or precision in its flame markings (I adore Fletchling and Fletchinder because they don't have these things and are more basic-shape-oriented). But when I think of it all this way, is it just me, or would Talonflame be right at home chilling in Kanto with Pidgeot? In older Generations, I could totally see its spots skipping a game, its flame patterns changing up every so often, its proportions getting shuffled around just like any older design. [...]

There are certainly still exceptions to this as well, but I think the easiest way of noticing what I mean is looking at Generation V's animated sprites and seeing how newer and older designs look in comparison to one another. That's kind of the turning point for the designs anyway, both in my point and in these eye examples, so it's entirely possible that it's the cause?

In any case, it's not exactly easy to place one single difference that defines all old designs vs all new designs, because it's quite gradual. I actually really respect this observation anyway because it definitely holds some weight (when looking for exceptions to cite on this list, I actually realized it held truer than I initially thought even if it's not all-inclusive), and it's a really interesting point! But I don't think the eyes are what make the entire design feel wrong. There are also things like shapes, precision, or colors (since I didn't mention this above, a quick summary: new designs have more colors, while old designs simply couldn't due to technical limitations, and the shift from one or two colors on an "elaborate, awesome" Legendary to a frequent 4+ on a basic stage is quite apparent)... pretty much every aspect has evolved over time. I personally welcome the new designs and really appreciate how much effort and thought goes into them, but then again, I'm of the age range that began playing with Sinnoh and grew up right at the start of this development, so I can't exactly judge anyone who's more familiar with the older Generations and didn't have both sides of the start for being nostalgic and missing the old.

Of course, we all have different opinions and we all deserve respect for them! I may welcome the change, and someone else might dislike it, and a third party might deny there's any change at all. They're all Pokémon, and plenty of us are okay just enjoying the game and don't really care! XP But I think that if you're regularly getting into debates over this, whether on the side of the old or the new, it's important to see the difference and know what you're debating, not just to think one side is better without being able to put a finger on why (and, to be fair everyone does have different reasons for the belief, so my post probably doesn't work for someone else anyway); it's not all about creativity and "trash versus sludge" in everyone's minds!

MittensSlowpaw · 1 points · Posted at 12:40:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

So basically in the past as fighters they were angry and focused! Ready to beat the enemy into the ground for the win! Then later they became cute little sissy love puppets that are ready to get into slap fights for victory.

Interesting....

servontos · 0 points · Posted at 13:14:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

What?

OIPROCS · 1 points · Posted at 13:00:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn OP. You're not onto something, you fucking parked on top of it and set up shop.

This is one of those things you can't unsee. And it is too obvious they change this to make Pokemon less intimidating.

MyWordIsBond · 1 points · Posted at 13:07:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

"I think they all look fantastic" is the kind of political answer you give when a girl tries to back you into a corner with the "What type do women do are you into? Thick, thin? Blonde, brunette? Etc?" type questions.

ensignlee · 1 points · Posted at 13:07:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thansk to /u/Berlchicken, I can now confidently say that yes, it's all in the eyes.

jrsooner · 1 points · Posted at 13:25:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean, I still think its because they used things like Trash Bags and Ice Cream Cones...

robizzle89 · 1 points · Posted at 13:34:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh yes. The manly aggressive look on the pokemon back then, like they fucking hated you for disturbing them and now they have this soulless toy eyes.

gacdeuce · 1 points · Posted at 13:48:06 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is true. The old eyes look like Pokémon. Nearly unmistakable. The new eyes look like ponies.

thegreattaiyou · 1 points · Posted at 13:53:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I know, at least for me, a big reason they don't feel like pokemon is that a lot of them have stopped taking believably organic forms.

Gen 1 lacked a little creativity. Literal rat, literal bird, literal useless fish out of water. But the pokemon were organic. You feel like with a bit of imagination, onyx or charizard could be actual creatures.

Since about Gen 4, we have seen this slow transition to less organic pokemon.

Vanilite is an ice cream cone. That is something man-made. Palosand is the same way. No organic body would believably take that form. The sword and shield pokemon, the chandelier pokemon, that legendary mellota or whatever, that is a pop star with a microphone built into her head. Magearna was literally invented and built by humans. Imagine if someone took an RC car to a dog race.

Tl;dr: For me, the pokemon have just stopped being believably organic.

mrmongomasterofcongo · 1 points · Posted at 13:59:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Technically porygon was made by humans too, but I see your point

thegreattaiyou · 1 points · Posted at 17:43:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah yeah. I never liked porygon either.

Mewtwo was made by humans, as well. But believably so.

mrmongomasterofcongo · 1 points · Posted at 18:30:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Right? Fucking cloning. Dope ass shit.

SuperChadBros · 1 points · Posted at 14:00:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a huge part of it. Gen 1 and even a good chunk of Gen 2 were cows, birds, ducks, etc. Then you start getting things like Skitty, Nosepad, Ralts, and more and more deviations of what is "real".

thegreattaiyou · 1 points · Posted at 17:46:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think Gen 3 was a great balance of fantasy and believability. They were less realistic, but I could still see how they could be organic. How, in a different universe, those animals might evolve naturally.

Ice cream and sand castles don't have that organic feel.

CRANIEL · 1 points · Posted at 14:02:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes the eyes are bad but also the overall designs are retarded and shit.

chewycat12 · 1 points · Posted at 14:50:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've been playing since gen 1, and personally I really like the new eyes. make em look cuter

fullmetalcrysis · 1 points · Posted at 14:57:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hopefully one day gamefreak sees this and goes back

Rakkuuuu · 1 points · Posted at 15:03:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Whatever it is, new gen is shit.

IforgotwhatIwasdoing · 1 points · Posted at 17:51:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

26 pokemon on the left, 15 pokemon on the right. I can't believe OP caught all 41 pokemon in the game in order to prove this. /s

Avocado_OverDose · 1 points · Posted at 19:08:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I only like OG Pokemon. Not this new stuff

inklebop · 1 points · Posted at 01:53:48 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

They are all pokemon, it's just evolution of design I suppose. I personally prefer newer pokemon, as I find older ones to be more generic, they look a lot closer to actual animals and aren't very interesting imo.

nwsreddit · -4 points · Posted at 05:25:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New ones look like Digimon eyes

purpldevl · 5 points · Posted at 06:54:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New Digimon don't really have a Digimon feel to them either, though. Especially the ones that are just blatantly naked women in weird armor.

VectorAmazing · 9 points · Posted at 07:06:46 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Didn't that applied to Angewomon too ?

purpldevl · -2 points · Posted at 07:08:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

She was Digimon-esque, though. She had odd proportions. I'm talking... The girl in a pig suit. The weird new "tits" version of Beelzebumon. There are quite a few non-woman Digimon that just look way off too.

Poppin__Fresh · 4 points · Posted at 10:39:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

LadyDevimon was one of the originals and she's exactly what you're describing..

VectorAmazing · 1 points · Posted at 07:14:07 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can I see that Beelzebumon ? Hoping it's not too NSFW-looking, I'm on my work's phone.

purpldevl · 1 points · Posted at 07:32:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Google "Beel Starmon". She's literally a woman wearing Beelzebumon's jacket with only the tops of her boobs covered.

VectorAmazing · 1 points · Posted at 07:51:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Less obscene that I thought, but still, I understand your point : rule 63 Beelzebumon, with shades of rule 34. Heck, even Belle Starmon sounds like a porn actress name !

Masterness64 · 5 points · Posted at 07:20:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Condings · -1 points · Posted at 12:51:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I reckon it's more to do with the fact that they've ran out of ideas for the Pokemon I mean just look at the new ones. An ice cream cone that evolves into a double ice cream cone and that Pokemon that's just some keys.

-GWM- · 4 points · Posted at 13:10:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They havnt run out of ideas, it's just designs you don't like.

Every generation has shitty Pokémon.

You're saying a pokeball, evolving into an upside down pokeball, is creative? Or grimer to muk?

IIIRUCKUSllI · -1 points · Posted at 12:53:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Don't forget the sandcastle!!!

Condings · 1 points · Posted at 13:00:47 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or that stove looking one 😑

Condings · 1 points · Posted at 13:26:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Looks like the rest of the posts got deleted we must have been on the right track, how sad

Ryulightorb · -4 points · Posted at 07:03:31 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

new looks better imho

Kissthesky89 · 0 points · Posted at 10:04:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I thought it had to do with the "oh shit im running out of ideas" ice cream cone bastard.

Poppin__Fresh · 2 points · Posted at 10:42:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Still better than seal.

test822 · 0 points · Posted at 10:37:42 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

it's not just the eyes. they've long since run out of basic shapes and animals, and now have to tack on a bunch of fins, poofs, antenna, horns, etc. the new legendaries look like you rolled a magnet around in a junk drawer

Eleglas · 0 points · Posted at 10:49:02 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I dislike that they try to make all the newer ones look "cute".

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 10:49:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

There's a fucking sand castle pokemon?

bonsley6 · 3 points · Posted at 12:11:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yo don't you talk shit about palossand

GreyFoxNinjaFan · 0 points · Posted at 10:52:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

My wife's only real interaction with Pokemon has been Pokemon Go. She said all the new Pokemon don't seem like they were designed or created with very much effort.. and they're all a bit too 'cutsey'.

Woofgangsta · 1 points · Posted at 11:59:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

But Pokemon Go has only old Pokemon...

GreyFoxNinjaFan · 1 points · Posted at 12:11:57 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh god.. please don't make me feel older than I already am.

eceuiuc · 1 points · Posted at 13:56:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Your so called "new" pokemon are only two years younger than the original 151.

J-ohnny · 0 points · Posted at 10:56:48 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree

16Mega · 0 points · Posted at 12:32:30 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
marshall19 · 0 points · Posted at 12:49:59 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I remember back in the day I was thinking the mid-generations looked pretty stupid, but nothing compares to the latest generations. Klefki has got to be the stupidest, least creative pokemon ever created.

IIIRUCKUSllI · 0 points · Posted at 13:04:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

The sandcastle one Is bad too

marshall19 · 0 points · Posted at 14:05:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh wow, that is terrible. I feel like the design for those two would appeal to infants that wouldn't be old enough to play a video game.

theLoveGiant · 0 points · Posted at 22:08:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No, they are running out of ideas and making over half look very stupid. They use to look like mythical animals now they look like they've been designed by a little girl.

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 10:01:27 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mostly only genwunners are saying the new designs suck. They're a lot more visually interesting Gen II onwards IMO (I remember Gen II being pretty experimental, gen III had some big hits and misses, like Gen V, Gen VII might have some of my favourites so far).

Oh yeah, this is r/gaming where RBY are the only pokémon games that exist, and badmouthing them is suicide.

[deleted] · -4 points · Posted at 10:12:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I log on to reddit only to find this is the top of my list. Really? There aren't better things to worry about in this, the year 2017? Okay. Pokemon eyes. shrugs I guess.

Teh_Concrete · 3 points · Posted at 10:16:19 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For real? You're obviously subscribed to r/gaming and wonder when there's something from it on your list?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 10:25:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I guess they haven't invented sarcasm font yet, because the internet is apparently still tone-deaf.

battery_siege · 1 points · Posted at 11:46:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

/s

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 12:08:23 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah yes, the ancient MS-DOS xcopy switch: /s Copies folders and subfolders except empty ones.

battery_siege · 2 points · Posted at 13:40:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You got me! That's interesting, though. I didn't know that before.

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 10:32:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

Tristan_Afro · 0 points · Posted at 11:05:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They never left?

whitelightning89 · -1 points · Posted at 11:10:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Correct, they just got overran by garbage "mega evolving" fakes

josekiller · -1 points · Posted at 13:02:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

For me there are only 251 pokemons.

-GWM- · 1 points · Posted at 13:05:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Damn... it's been about a year since I've seen a genwunner and you broke my streak

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 09:55:45 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thats a great observation.

jsideris · 0 points · Posted at 10:04:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

First impression is that the now eyes sort of look like My Little Pony eyes. Not that I watch that...

Emmully · 0 points · Posted at 10:38:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok

RedTeamReview · 0 points · Posted at 11:12:15 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That and the fact that the new ones suck. Say what you want about gen 1 but that was back when this was created without the idea of milking the hell out of a franchise.

Eighty_88_Eight · 0 points · Posted at 11:18:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I hate the new

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 11:27:08 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

those new pokemon have more appeal on the feminine consumers, and guys will play pokemon regardless, even if they rendered as asciii text...

Bosticles · 0 points · Posted at 12:36:14 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
-GWM- · 2 points · Posted at 13:13:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean they're pretty cool Pokémon.

You're saying a pile of goo, bigger pile of goo, a pokeball that evolves by turning upside down, a pink pile of goo, a magnet, you're saying those are more creative?

servontos · 1 points · Posted at 13:15:36 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

All gens have Pokémon that are just random objects, but everyone likes to cream their pants over gen 1

mr_bigmouth_502 · 0 points · Posted at 13:03:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Call me crazy, but I much prefer the newer look to the older look. I mean, I was into Pokemon way back when the craze started in 1999, but I think the newer designs are cuter. :3

LilEskimo · 0 points · Posted at 13:09:49 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I like the new ones. Their cuter and more appealing. Not a huge fan of the angry eyebrows.

creto15 · 0 points · Posted at 14:04:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I started playing Pokemon from when blue just came out and now looking at the new Pokemon I just haven't been real thrilled about them. I didn't like sun and Moon I thought the pokemon were kiddish. I miss going for gym battles. Overall I haven't been thrilled with the games since black and white came out. I do love the fight screens but they are making things too much. It's just my opinion I know most won't agree.

milk_man2100 · 0 points · Posted at 14:09:00 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

After seeing altered version, it absolutely is the eyes.

Donotpmmeanythingplz · 0 points · Posted at 15:05:18 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

No. In my opinion they just don't look cool. Like they ran out of ideas and just started drawing weird looking things.

NoCoastGaming · 0 points · Posted at 17:18:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Honestly the biggest issue with the new Pokemon is that they all have that furry-fanart vibe.

Criminon · 0 points · Posted at 17:23:54 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've been saying this for fucking years.

[deleted] · 0 points · Posted at 17:43:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

SinicalMC · 0 points · Posted at 18:32:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Also I feel like a lot of new Pokemon are "curvy" using a lot of curvy lines or gentle slopes where Pokemon like Rhydon use a lot of sharp and aggressive lines or angles.

Seaguard5 · 0 points · Posted at 00:13:31 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

I was talking about what makes Pokemon Pokemon, as in, the Pokemon themselves- which it is clear from the character designs that they belong in a different game... I mean not just that though.. As you said the way they have altered the story progression and the art style just doesn't fit the series in the past. Honestly would you advocate they keep attempting to milk "Pokemon" for ever without end?

Along with that would you call something else, anything else, that kept the core mechanics of Pokemon and made new characters, didn't matter what they looked like, and called it Pokemon would it be Pokemon? No. See, that gets to the point of how much can you change and still be legitimate in calling it the same thing which the "Pokemon" that Nintendo calls it's most recent work is Infact not so.

If they want to keep making games like Pokemon that's awesome but just do the series a service and call it something else.

thefinalturnip · 1 points · Posted at 18:24:12 on April 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

And call it what? Dragon Quest: Monsters? Please, your post makes no sense. You have no idea how art evolves and changes over the years. The first designs of Pokemon were all influenced by tendencies. Those eyes are very common in 80s' to 90's mangas.

Over the years art has to adapt and change. It's not about changing the core essence of anything. If you seriously believe in all that stuff you just said then you know absolutely nothing about art. If they kept the same style today, and sold Pokemon, it would look outdated and bad. Obviously the old Pokemon are already designed and that can't be changed. They maintain the same look if only updated to look more articulate and proportionate. Same thing for all the human characters. Look at the difference in Red from Gen 1 to Red in Gen 3 or his newest design in Gen 7. Look at how Ash has changed over the years and no, I'm not talking about his sudden change from X and Y to Sun and Moon. Want a bigger more obvious example? Look at Pikachu. Hell even Bulbasaur.

If there's something I've learned over the years by graduating as a Licentiate of Graphic Design is that art never stops evolving. It's constantly changing. Sooner or later this current style for Pokemon is also going to change.

Seaguard5 · 1 points · Posted at 18:03:29 on April 14, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well obviously not (dragon quest is already taken and adding "monsters" wouldn't change it enough) but anything else that isn't taken would be a welcome change. "Please".. What? Stop arguing this perfectly valid point I'm bringing up? Well I'm afraid I can't do that since I am such a huge pokéfan, but thanks for asking nicely I guess?

Well it may not make sense to you because you may be blinded by your blind love for the name that Nintendo slaps onto their games. They can call it anything they want but it doesn't make it so. I actually do know that art evolves and changes and Pokemon was no exception to that. I am by no means a "gen-1er" and actually appreciate the games up to and including gen 4. Colosseum and XD were some of my favorites actually and that switched from 2d to 3D so yeah. That's an artistic evolution and yes I understand that that is a good thing. I also understand that the eyes alone don't make an art style, the characters now differ from those in the original trilogy so that they are incomparable. You could argue that you could compare them by features but that's like saying apples and oranges are both fruits. It doesn't have to do with the specific art style that makes Pokemon (as per original trilogy).

Woh bro. Chill out =| I actually make art so... Yeah. I know at least something XD but aside from your shallow and clearly erroneous insinuations I'll actually argue the point, because I have nothing against you and just care about Pokemon. I understand how art adapts and changes through time and that made Pokemon great when it was still so. The problem came when they deviated so greatly from what makes Pokemon Pokemon (the story progression, character art, ETC) that they actually made something that resembles it only through the most core of mechanics, which is not enough to call it what they do legitimately.

You see, something can change all it wants but if those changes divert it far enough away from the style that made something what it is then it is something else. You have to understand that, right? Granted my idea of deviation might be a bit smaller than yours but the same concept applies. For example if they put Pokemon in a call of duty game you can't call it Pokemon because, well, it would simply be too different from an actual Pokemon game (you couldn't call it a mainline title at very least).

You also bring up that if they sold the same or similar style than past games it would look "outdated and bad". Well my friend that is subjective and varies from person to person. This brings me to another point. Some people consider "modern art" to be art. Some of them only because art is in the name and it must be art just because someone calls it that right? And some others yet because they actually prefer the style. Well in my opinion a white square is just that- not art and if someone pays millions of dollars for something they could as easily make in a day then they are pretty stupid. But that is my opinion and you might completely disagree. This is where the argument comes in, where the closest to facts can only be established in opinions and we can never know the true opinion of everyone who has one on this subject so there is no "right" or "wrong" answer. Some people simply believe one thing and others believe another.

You also say that old pokés can't be changed yet you contradict yourself in saying as one of your prime examples that pikachu has changed a lot. And indeed pikachu has gone from being a fat mouse-like character (not knocking the style just objectively describing) to a thinner less mouse looking character. This just goes to show that older pokés have indeed been "remodeled" to fit the newer graphics better and that's great!

Bringing up the argument from authority, that's great! I'm sure you know a lot. But as you probably know you could also be wrong (not saying you are), that's where the logical fallacy comes into play. It's better just to cite facts but I'll agree with art changing and evolving.

But do you not agree that all good things must come to an end? When do you purport that Pokemon should stop? Never? Do you advocate that the team be confined to the same formula over and over again and be expected to create more and more Pokemon until the end of time? What's so good about not being able to even know all the Pokemon and abilities and items and everything else that goes into competitive play except if you devote all of your free time to it and nothing else? How many Pokemon are there now anyway? Almost 1000? That's simply too many to memorize for the average, let alone even pretty dedicated gamer. And that takes away from the accessibility of the series at least. Most people instead of wanting to memorize so many things to simply play the game properly would just probably go somewhere else for something similar.

radredrum · -7 points · Posted at 09:30:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

you mean it's a bad thing they're actually putting effort into designing the eyes instead of just drawing triangles?

AB_De_Villiers · -2 points · Posted at 11:27:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is why nothing can replace Charizard, Blastoise and Mewtwo!

Greenwolfeth · -3 points · Posted at 11:50:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've always said the new pokemons are bullshit and not even pokemons. Looks like apple phone app version of Pokemon

S3W3D · -1 points · Posted at 09:32:40 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because people like more what they saw first and any changes may lead to disagreement such as if you were to hear a remix of a song first then the original you'll probably say that the remix version sounds better since you heard it first. There's not right or wrong answer just which one you saw first...

king-lizard · -1 points · Posted at 09:45:03 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR AGES THANK YOU

JB241 · -1 points · Posted at 09:46:32 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Switched to My Little Pony eyes

PM_A_Personal_Story · -1 points · Posted at 09:48:38 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

If that's the price to get girls involved I'm all for it

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 10:28:26 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Virginity SHIELDS RAISED!!!!!!! Engage chronic masturbation and an inability to leave mothers home.

MarukoRedfox · -1 points · Posted at 11:52:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They should stop using the "cute-design-formula" and start to use the "interesting-design-formula" again

themariokarters · -1 points · Posted at 12:16:34 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ugh even the Pokémon are snowflakes these days

[deleted] · -1 points · Posted at 13:29:28 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

New pokemon look like shit, I'm sorry. After Gen 4 they all started looking like utter recycled garbage.

guthepenguin · 2 points · Posted at 13:37:17 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

More literally so with Trubbish and Garbodor.

Seaguard5 · -1 points · Posted at 18:49:52 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Not just the eyes. Nintendo has run out of ideas period. The new games aren't Pokemon at all.. None of it has any relation to any past games except those that Nintendo forces like the general system is the same like battles and moves but the new monsters are just that. Not Pokemon.

xstreamstorm · 5 points · Posted at 19:16:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

pokemon means pocket monsters though?

And have you played any of the new games? give them a chance.

Seaguard5 · 1 points · Posted at 19:54:35 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

You misunderstood. The style that the games up to sun and moon have set doesn't even resemble what they are doing now...

Have I played them? No. Have I seen gameplay yes. Is that all I need to form the opinions I have? Yes. Is that all I need to plainly see that the new characters do not resemble the Pokemon of the past six versions? Yes.

xstreamstorm · 1 points · Posted at 22:37:11 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Style as in? The sos battles? The fact that alola isn't one connected region? The player customisation?

I think sun and moon kept the core game play in tact ie what made pokemon pokemon. It's not like they suddenly decided that pokeballs aren't used to get pokemon or something.

XMTheS · -14 points · Posted at 05:21:04 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
Inurian59 · -4 points · Posted at 07:58:50 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That's literally just how a Japanese anime art styles have advanced over the years

OFJehuty · -7 points · Posted at 09:37:01 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeaaaaah the eyes are certainly different but they are by no means the only (or main) reason why everything after the original 150(+1) look like shit.

I wouldn't say they "dont look like pokemon" because Pokemon look like whatever the people who create them design them to look like. But they do look stupid and poorly designed.

Femiwhore · -6 points · Posted at 11:13:51 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

They ran out of ideas after Gen 2. Anyone who plays anything beyond that is retarded.

jtoppings95 · 4 points · Posted at 11:30:44 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

That like... Just your opinion man.

vwLoLwv · 2 points · Posted at 11:14:39 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Why do you comment such a comment?

Dragonstark · 2 points · Posted at 11:35:16 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

I mean this is comment is retarded

[deleted] · -2 points · Posted at 10:56:58 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)
TheLastWarWizard · -3 points · Posted at 12:58:29 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, there is the eye thing, then there is the fact that the new ones are sarcophagi, ice creams, and balloons...

-GWM- · 2 points · Posted at 13:08:10 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is the dumbest argument ever. No generation is special. The old ones were a pokeball, an upside down pokeball, sludge, bigger pile of sludge, set of magnets, 3 sets of magnets.

Gen 1 was just as uncreative as some are now. There's no difference in the creativity between generations of Pokémon.

servontos · 1 points · Posted at 13:06:12 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Opposed to an upside down poke ball, a pile of slime, and a floating ball with gas around it?

PM_ME__UR_LADYGARDEN · -4 points · Posted at 09:38:33 on April 11, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wait to see the pokemon from United airline