Hard to believe people who have spent their entire lives trying to defend and teach that Joseph translated the plates will now have to do a 180 and believe he “dictated” the plates.
And yet somehow, I know they will still believe it. It’s insane.
This may seem unrelated, but I'm sharing it to demonstrate that how I concur with you.
I remember being incredibly pissed off four years ago after news outlets reported that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy. I wasn't pissed off to discover that Smith was engaged in polygamy (I couldn't give a toss), but because other Latter-Day Saints told me that it "wasn't news" – the Church had ALWAYS taught that Smith was a polygamist.
Not ONCE in ANY of my Sunday School classes, Seminary studies, or Fireside presentations was I EVER told that Smith was polygamous. I was ALWAYS led to believe that Emma was his one and only.
It was one thing for the Church to admit that he was a polygamist; it was completely different for people to pretend that it wasn't a 180.
I remember when the churches Joseph Smith movie came out. I was on my mission and we got to watch it. I knew about JS polygamy. It was a big shelf item seeing the church lie by omission.
[deleted] · 10 points · Posted at 07:00:39 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
That movie is pure propaganda because all the words he speaks and all the actions he takes in the movie make him seem like a pure saint and whenever I think of Joseph Smith I think of this wonderful, awesome husband (despite thinking he's a fraud). I have to remember it's just propaganda haha.
It’s a test of faith. Men... err... god constantly changes reality so that we can CHOOSE to believe that his prophets are jnspired. Periodically, he’ll make it seem like they lied, but they really didn’t, because anything g they say is true.
It’s like a rainbow. In some places you see red, other places green or indigo or yellow or blue. You could argue that they are completely different things, but ultimately they are just reflections of the same thing - the rainbow - that is the ultimate truth. So translate or dictate... it’s God’s way of speaking through him. Now feel the feels and come back to church.
I'm not sure I understand the issue, it seems pretty obvious that they'd have to change it to "dictation" once the cat was out of the bag about the "face in the hat" thing. Clearly you can't be translating something just by staring into a hat with a stone without even having the source material present.
I agree, but TBM’s are impossible to corner when confronted with facts. They just keep retreating. I can see it now: “I always knew he dictated it”, “why does it matter how it got done?” And all other sorts of bullshit. It amazes me how far they will go to convince themselves.
That’s the thing, with new “revelation” and the church being “restored” some more, they can change their narrative as much as they like and claim it’s either revelation or clarification.
The old narrative was gaslighting. I'm not a fan of Nelson, and I've already resigned, but I am wondering if he's trying to straighten up the history and do a few no-brainer things like reducing church to two hours? Yes, he is a jerk. Not saying he isn't, but am starting to wonder the purpose of his actions.
For 179 years this book has been examined and attacked, denied and deconstructed, targeted and torn apart like perhaps no other book in modern religious history—perhaps like no other book in any religious history. And still it stands. —Jeffrey R. Holland
Sometimes you just gotta manipulate some of the facts to keep that trend alive.
He really overestimates how many people care either way. There are so few people that care enough to actually research and tear down the BoM, the history of the church itself is so much more damning and interesting.
That's exactly why he had the talk on the BoM. He wants people (members) to only look at the BoM when it comes to believing in the church and Holland believes it's the strongest argument for the church being true (as opposed to early church history, doctrines of the prophets, etc)
It's like he's saying 'As long as just one of us refuses to acknowledge facts, this hoax will still stand! They can't say or do anything that will make us question our beliefs!'
Well, that...and just because he CLAIMS it still stands doesn't make it so.
Is it still a book? Sure. Is it still published? At the cost of the lives of trees that could be better put to other use, if they have to be "used at all, yes.
He's saying it just to prevent the tbms from checking to see if it really stands. "He said it, it's taken care of, so I don't need to research it." Worked on me for a long time till I actually researched it and saw that he was lying.
I think that as the info found in the CES letter becomes more and more well known, they are changing the narrative in an effort to say they were right all along. Won’t work, in my opinion. Only the truly brainwashed will see this happening and accept it. The younger generations are seeing right through this bullshit
I lived in Happy Valley and I can think of a good number that were in my high school seminary that have since left the church. Granted, there were quite a few of us that were there by peer/parental pressure, not any desire to go.
See that's where you're wrong -- it's already working. The narrative has already changed se, will continue to change, and is having the desired effect: to make the Mormon experience more metaphorical such that it is harder to challenge in a rational / factual way.
It's just that this process is slow and will take a long long time
If the swing toward metaphorical interpretation went far enough, it would effectively soften everything. The less literal the interpretation of everything, the less rigid the culture. Word of wisdom wouldn't be so strictly enforced, the unspoken sense of prophetic infallibility would melt away, and the act of leaving the church wouldn't be such a major statement for the individual leaving or such a devastating loss to the family of said individual.
"Dictation" allows them to slowly shift the narrative away from "translation" because all available evidence of Joe "Rape Train" Smith is that he had precisely zero ability to translate.
If God super seriously just whispered it in your ear, then seer stones and BoA and fake gold plates and kinderhook gets a back seat to hearing voices divine inspiration.
Raknarg · 9 points · Posted at 01:06:57 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I thought TBMs used the fact that he couldn't have translated them as evidence he has divine help?
It’s “better” in the sense that they no longer have any burden of proof to tie the text of the BoM to an original source. In a dictation narrative, the original source is inspiration/revelation instead of something tangible.
jrob801 · 6 points · Posted at 08:53:55 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
This is true, but it's a double edged sword. The claims of the BOM being a translated history of a real society are one of the big draws of mormonism. If they willfully back away from claims that it's a historically true work, and try to rely on metaphor and Joe Smith's powers of "revelation", they instantly become as much of a joke as Scientologists.
I'm not sure there's a middle ground here. If they back away from the claim that Joe translated ancient artifacts, they have a really hard time defending the truth claims of the BoM. The most classic anti-mormon argument comes from Revelations 22:18-19, wherein the bible is closed with an admonition not to add to it's works. Mormon's have sidestepped that by claiming the BoM isn't an addition to the bible, but a history of a different group of people in a different place. Change the narrative to make the story metaphorical, and they lose the claim. It becomes a very clear addition to the Bible.
"Dictation" allows for a divinely inspired text without (1) having to have actual plates that contained the text that JSJ dictated and (2) having to have historicity of everything that Joseph dictated. It allows for a hybrid of some history and some fiction or just entirely fiction, but (of course) all of it being divinely inspired from TSCC's point of view. I don't think TSCC wants to go to "entirely fiction" but "some fiction" allows for a helluva lot of wiggle room to dodge criticisms, though it raises others too.
Yeah, probably. TSCC would never go full "no plates". I think they would have to go with the expansion theory at most in which Joseph dictates some of the content of the plates and also provides additional content. It's hard to go fully "no plates" without running into the criticism you've raised.
Not necessarily, The idea is that Joseph Smith receives inspiration, whether words or ideas or images in his head, and he dictates them to craft an inspired fiction (kinda like a parable but possibly with Joseph not realizing he is telling a parable) with some historical details received from revelation. Some apologists have an "expansion theory" where Joseph uses material from the plates but then expands it to include 19th century material and non-historical material. I haven't looked into the expansion theory because it seems like a desparate attempt to explain away the 19th century material and non-historical material, but I'll probably look into it eventually for some laughs.
Ohhhhhh 😕 What would be the difference the. I wonder between RLDS and LDS view on BOM? I was always taught growing up that RLDS just think that the Book of Mormon are nice stories to teach a lesson as opposed to LDS who believe it is literal and the people were real.
I think Community of Christ currently allows its members to think whatever they want about BOM, historical or not. It doesn’t mandate historicity like TSCC does. TSCC might be moving towards something like that — but that’s a difficult pivot to pull off successfully. It may be that apologists like Brian Hales will have their pet theories on dictation without TSCC ever allowing active members to openly doubt BOM historicity.
I'm unceasingly astonished at the explanations that are invented by apologists and swallowed by believers. Reminds of a quote I heard recently: "Humans are not rational creatures, we are rationalizing creatures." (And this makes me question whether my own thinking is entirely rational...)
In "The Righteous Mind", Jonathan Haidt argues that we emotionally reach conclusions and then use logic to justify those conclusions. We humans are all susceptible to this and critical thinking, to the extent we are able to practice it, is healthy.
I don't get it either. It's easy to frame him reading words off the seer stone as "dictating" rather than translating, but what's the difference? We don't have the original plates to compare a translation on.
How does it help if he was dictating sheep and horses and barley and wheat that didn't exist in the Americas at that time? Or cureloms, cumoms and Adieu?
When it comes down to it, I don't think most TBMs care if JS dictated or translated the BoM. TBMs have a testimony in the truthfulness of the BoM, it makes them feel warm and fuzzy. The vocabulary surrounding the how the book came to be doesn't matter, because TBMs have faith it is a book from God.
Plus now they can claim the kinderhook plates were him trying to translate as a man, and for the Book of Mormon he was “inspired as a prophet to dictate” or some shit like that.
Spouse says he had to dictate them to the scribe so they could write it down and by the end he didn't need the hat, stone, urim and thum, etc because he "learned" how to "translate" by then.
Somewhere deep in Elder Oaks subconsciousness so he can hide from it, right next to the fact that he and Rusty have inappropriately touched each other a time or two in their excitement over these new “revelations”
Convert here....when I started taking the missionary discussions/going to church I had to learn a whole new vocabulary. Vision, translate by the power of God, Stake Center, Fireside, Heavenly Father, Priesthood, Melchizedek, Aaronic, garments, ordinance, sealing, patriarch, sacrament, repent, petting 🤮, how to pray “properly”, eternity, funeral potatoes, all the whack ass BoM names, etc etc etc.
DICTATE/DICTATION were never on the list of new vocabulary. Not once. It doesn’t even fit into the Mormon file in my brain. I have to attempt to add it, to stretch the boundaries of my 30 year old Mormon vocab file to make it fit.
God the vocabulary is ridiculous. it’s so weird to catch yourself making a comment to a nevermo about a stake or a elders quorum or some weird shit like that. Never once in my life growing up in the heart of the Utah did I hear dictate. It was ALWAYS translate. Crazy.
I had to learn the same new list of useless words. Well, the word "petting" was around years ago, but the dumbass terms like stake, ward, elders' quorum (when they are the young ones), "high" priest (aren't we soooo modest!), "visiting teacher" and "home teacher," etc.
Never made sense to me that young missionaries are "elders," then there's the EQ, then nobody is called an "Elder" for a long while, then the GAs (yet another term) are called "Elder." But year, it was always "translated." Never heard "dictated."
Can you believe we put up with this stupidity? Cult, cult, cult!
[deleted] · 17 points · Posted at 18:28:36 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
So Hales is branching out from proving that Smith Jr was a serial adulterer through his illegal polygamous and polyandrous marriages and moving on to try to reconcile the BoM as fiction.
Good job, Brian! You will get even more people to leave the church through your shitty and unbelievable excuses!
___Shawn · 12 points · Posted at 19:43:30 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
To be fair, someone could both translate and dictate at the same time.
Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is freaking out about this. Did any of you bother to look at the article? It says that the Book of Mormon was "translated" by the gift and power of God. Joseph dictated the book whether it was revealed or translated (or made up). Brian Hales, the author, is commenting on the process of dictation, not on the genesis of the text.
Yeah it’s more the fact that they choose to use the word dictate now in the title. Every Mormon grew up talking about how Joseph “translated”, which denotes a direct translation from one language to another. We know he didn’t even look at the plates when he was translating though, so that doesn’t add up and most Mormons don’t even know that. It’s just another example of gaslighting in my opinion.
So much this. Once the church concedes (a) that he didn’t translate and (b) he didn’t therefore need the plates, and therefore (c) the Book of Mormon is fiction rather than history, the plates are irrelevant. That’s good for the church, right?
Wrong.
Where did the plates come from?
Who buried them?
If they were unnecessary because it’s all just inspired scripture, why the narrative about the plates at all? What the hell did Mormoni drag them all over North America for?
The result is catastrophic for the church. If the book is ahistorical, there WERE. NO. PLATES. Or if there were, Joseph made them himself. And in either case, he lied about their provenance.
GBH was right. Either the Book of Mormon is what it claims to be or it’s a massive fraud. They can sugar coat it all they want and try to change the narrative, but the cost is to eventually have to admit that insofar as the BofM is concerned, Joseph Smith was a fraud.
I see your point. I was thinking of the other favorite word they use “inspired + translation”... but I see now OP only used translation in this discussion, which is still the same as dictate. My misunderstanding and inserting deep rooted Mormon vocabulary from my head into this conversation.
[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 19:54:07 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I thought they were moving away from the narrative that the BOM was historically true. Why does ‘dictated’ vs. ‘translated’ matter in this sense? Wouldn’t ‘dictated’ double down on the historical truth claims?
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 21:49:27 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
Nevermo here:
Isn't the whole head in the hat thing in the church essays?? Or am I remembering wrong?
But can't people just say now "if it was dictated correctly" Vs what they usually say "translated correctly"
The two aren't mutually exclusive. And like others have already mentioned, TBM's will continue believing despite what verbiage the church decides to use.
But yep, you're right. The church released an essay (fairly recently) that basically acknowledged the whole head in the hat thing. They of course won't use any images to depict this, especially given the number of official church images they have of Joseph Smith translating the BOM with the plates in front of him.
Would somebody kindly explain to me the difference between dictating the plates and translating the plates. I'm aware of the definitions of each word, but for some reason I cannot understand how this is a big thing when it comes to Joseph Smith and the plates. Thank you in advance!!
It’s a change in vernacular after nearly 200 years of using only one word: translate. Apologists stretch this word thin by using it to encompass multiple meanings (none of which are a standard definition of translation) as it has become more and more clear that JS didn’t translate shit.
So the word translation no longer means to translate. And now they have dropped that word after 200 years and are giving it a new word: dictation, which can be much more forgiving in its definition. They can use that wording to say that it was never translated from plates (because it wasn’t), instead it was dictated to Joseph Smith from God directly through a stone in a hat. The plates become unnecessary in this narrative. And this dictation narrative is closer to the truth so it takes wind out of critics sails and the church can say “nothing to see here, we’ve never claimed he translated, he was clearly always dictating from this rock via the spirit.
This also lays a path for the book of Abraham to be claimed as dictated inspiration, instead of a direct translation of the scrolls.
Thank you for the clear explanation. Now it is much more clear! This is just beyond nonsense in regards to the church pulling this off. It makes me feel more validated in leaving.
The title of the article is slightly misleading. The author still mentions that he translated the book, but the actual dictation is simply the process they used (in this case, Joseph Smith looking at the stone and reading aloud the words he saw).
Hard to believe people who have spent their entire lives trying to defend and teach that Joseph translated the plates will now have to do a 180 and believe he “dictated” the plates.
I'm afraid you are in error. The record shows that Joey dictated the story while looking in his hat and using his magic rock. IIRC, It is not firmly established that the plates were even present while Joey dictated the story. The church has no explanation if or how the alleged gold plates influenced Joey's utterances at all. That "church" basically implies that Joey had some kind of mystical communion with them. If you read carefully, the golden plates could have stayed buried and Joey could have done his Vulcan mind-meld with them anyway.
Understood, but it’s not taught like this at all. People grow up with images of Joseph literally translating from the plates. Will crack some shelves I hope.
And yet they still don’t realize that they’re even more fucked by the “God dictated the BoM to Joseph in the hat” method than by a potentially flawed/fuzzy translation.
Now they’re stuck with steel and horses and silk and wild castrated oxen. Life will find a way.
Can someone explain the controversy to me? I feel like I was always taught that he both translated AND dictated the plates. What is actually going on here?
[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 22:40:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
BOM was supposed to be "absolutely correct" and was not mistranslated, as was always vehemently stated by the members of the ward I grew up in, and is backed up by the book itself.
Any change to this admits only one thing, if you still want to believe, then you now have to believe GOD IS JUST A TROLL! He screwed with the original translation, stating it was correct, let us believe that for a long ass time, and then came back like "LOLs gAIZE!!! I GOTTED U!!!"
Came here to say this. Article of Faith #8 casts doubt on the Bible by adding that "as far as it is translated correctly" caveat, but I was taught that anything written by ol' Joe was supposed to be the pure, unblemished, word of God. (Cute confidence trick, there.) Now they want to tell us "Oh, nvmnd, the BofM has problems to, but no big. Just trust us." Please.
Link? I looked for it but it seems they took it down. I want to show my mom. Her shelf is close to breaking I think this could give it some good cracks.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 01:18:29 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
jamauss · 3 points · Posted at 00:15:28 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So after this oh-so-impressive translation or dictation or whatever - why did Joseph try and go up north and sell the rights to the copyright of the book? Which angel was it that told him to do that?
Raknarg · 3 points · Posted at 01:05:47 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
What does this serve whether it was translated?
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 01:11:33 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
It must be exhausting to be Brian C. Hales.
wbbm · 4 points · Posted at 02:51:51 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So if Joseph dictated through the stone that we still have, why doesn't the prophet now use it and dictate some more? I think most TBMs will get to this place and cause a lot of issues.
MrSwuft · 6 points · Posted at 03:06:00 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Am I going crazy or is there absolutely no mention of the golden plates in the text of the article at all?
I think this is a somewhat sidestep in the right direction -_-
but
It's my hope that maybe MAYBE in 10ish 20ish years we can finally end these vague charades as a religion and move forward with a full blow reformation...
One that is inclusive of all sexes, genders, and persuasions
Recognizes love as the pillar of our religion
And one that apologizes for our organizations past transgressions.....
Pipe Dreams are fun.
If that happens I'd be happy to come back....until then Fuck OFF TSCC
Here's why it's jaw-dropping - it has led to numerous deaths, rapes, suffering, pain, family quarrels/division, garments, and much more unfortunate side effects. All because of Joseph Smith.
Here's a link to the actual article: http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568 with the whole, 'He never had his last paragraph repeated' BS that is always spouted. All the players in the BOM are dead so we can't get the truth from them, but given what all of JS's neighbors said about him, I have often wondered how many people were involved in writing the Book of Mormon. In one John Dehlin interview it was stated that the list included Lucy Mack and that Emma knew about it.
who the hell is Brian C. Hales?
I never heard of him...
fairmormon says he's an anesthesiologist that's best known for writing a book about mormons. great, cause that's what I look for in an anesthesiologist: being an author of religious books.
Brian C. Hales is a Utah-based anesthesiologist and author. Perhaps his most prominent work, thus far, is Modern Polygamy and Mormon Fundamentalism: The Generations after the Manifesto. He received his medical degree from the University of Utah and did his residency at the University of Kansas Medical Center.
Dr. Hales served a mission for the church The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and has been a member of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir .
His other books include The Priesthood of Modern Polygamy: An LDS Perspective (with J. Max Anderson), The Doctrines of Mormon Fundamentalism (with J. Max Anderson), Is Fundamentalism Fundamental?, Light: The Physical and Spiritual Nature of Light, The Veil, and Trials: Understanding and Overcoming. He also operates a web site at mormonfundamentalism.com.
Brian Hale’s is so deceiving that he had fooled himself to believe the lies
Just like JS convinced himself to believe his own lies
Hale’s like JS
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 11:10:27 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Instead of translated or dictated they should just used the word inspired. Before I left I was thinking how much better it would be if they just admitted it wasnt real history but an inspired work.
That was, of course, before I new everything else was rubbish too.
Still doubling down on the “un educated, country bumpkin dumb shit theory”.
Still taking Emma’s “word” as the Gospel truth! Both JS and Emma are documented liars!! They both lied through their dam teeth about polygamy and I’m sure many other facts.
Now the fact that they were lying for the lord is some how ok but nonetheless they lied and they lied convincingly. (Just got to know when they are lying)
So Maybe they were trying to start a church to make a living????
Joseph was a convincing con man. I.e. Joseph: to Heber (Kimball) “I need to have your dear wife as my (inset number ) wife it is the lords commandment!!” After much fretting and despair, Heber; says “ok you can have her!”
Joseph “it was just a test”. Heber “oh thank god”. Joseph: “but I will take your teen age daughter”. Heber: oh no problem!” Thanks for the salvation.
The simplest most plausible explanation is that they formed a church cobbled together with ideas they liked and most importantly ideas that sold to people of that era. Now since it got off the ground It has been modified and tweaked so that it will continue to sell. History sells. History and artifacts sell. History, artifacts and mystic explanations sell even better!!
Preaching is a damn good way to make a living if you have the talent to talk, and inspire. Joseph, and the current leaders, have all of those talents in spades!
The product is polygamist sex, spiritual prowess( you can know shit and be guided by god!) and pure political power. Add in some salvation for the masses and by god it is some good shit!!
They have always said that he dictated it to someone who was writing it down. Rock-in-hat or plates. Your claim is void. Did you even read the article? lol.
First rule of argumentation: Know what the fk you are talking about.
Obviously he didn't translate it, whether you are a believer or a non believer, he either dictated it using magical means or he sat down with Co conspirators making the whole shit up. But either way he wasn't translating it. Which begs the question wtf does everyone say he did?
FWIW, I agree that the article isn't the angle that this thread is making it out to be. It's focusing on the mechanics of the dictation process as evidence that it was a translation vs. he was just making it up. This isn't anything new.
Apparently, if you start back up right where you left off, that's evidence that it came from God! (Or that he was reading from a pre-written draft. Which would be consistent with accounts that day he would spell out words he couldn't pronounce.)
Saved comment
TuesPigNAPoke · 245 points · Posted at 17:48:24 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Dictation? Holy gaslighting Batman!
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 191 points · Posted at 17:54:26 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Hard to believe people who have spent their entire lives trying to defend and teach that Joseph translated the plates will now have to do a 180 and believe he “dictated” the plates.
And yet somehow, I know they will still believe it. It’s insane.
TuesPigNAPoke · 76 points · Posted at 18:08:35 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yes! Cult! They will have to change their mantra testimonies from translated to dictated.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 274 points · Posted at 18:14:00 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Can’t wait to hear little kids on fast and testimony: “I know Joseph Smith was a true dictator”
rjschwerin · 28 points · Posted at 18:40:39 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Good one
Kinderhookersandblow · 23 points · Posted at 03:02:51 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
You can say that again. Joseph Smith WAS a true 🍆-🥔.
mcskewsme · 5 points · Posted at 07:32:03 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Brilliant
gavemyselftojesus · 11 points · Posted at 01:47:24 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
😂😂😂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
vegadbrilliant · 6 points · Posted at 01:54:36 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
💀😂
Momoselfie · 35 points · Posted at 23:34:59 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
In ten years those same people will say it's always been taught as a dictation not translation.
RedStellaSafford · 38 points · Posted at 00:00:11 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
This may seem unrelated, but I'm sharing it to demonstrate that how I concur with you.
I remember being incredibly pissed off four years ago after news outlets reported that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy. I wasn't pissed off to discover that Smith was engaged in polygamy (I couldn't give a toss), but because other Latter-Day Saints told me that it "wasn't news" – the Church had ALWAYS taught that Smith was a polygamist.
Not ONCE in ANY of my Sunday School classes, Seminary studies, or Fireside presentations was I EVER told that Smith was polygamous. I was ALWAYS led to believe that Emma was his one and only.
It was one thing for the Church to admit that he was a polygamist; it was completely different for people to pretend that it wasn't a 180.
Momoselfie · 24 points · Posted at 00:13:17 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I remember when the churches Joseph Smith movie came out. I was on my mission and we got to watch it. I knew about JS polygamy. It was a big shelf item seeing the church lie by omission.
RedStellaSafford · 7 points · Posted at 00:14:12 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
What did the movie say about it? I never saw it.
Momoselfie · 15 points · Posted at 01:32:42 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Just showed him with one wife his whole life.
[deleted] · 10 points · Posted at 07:00:39 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
That movie is pure propaganda because all the words he speaks and all the actions he takes in the movie make him seem like a pure saint and whenever I think of Joseph Smith I think of this wonderful, awesome husband (despite thinking he's a fraud). I have to remember it's just propaganda haha.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 9 points · Posted at 05:18:09 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
How many Mormons does it take to change a light bulb? Two: one to change it, and one to say that nothing has changed.
sanpompon · 21 points · Posted at 19:38:06 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It’s a test of faith. Men... err... god constantly changes reality so that we can CHOOSE to believe that his prophets are jnspired. Periodically, he’ll make it seem like they lied, but they really didn’t, because anything g they say is true.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 10 points · Posted at 21:29:26 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Some TBM’s will find a way to bullshit an answer to satisfy themselves about this haha
zMerovingian · 30 points · Posted at 21:57:23 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Puts on TBM hat...
It’s like a rainbow. In some places you see red, other places green or indigo or yellow or blue. You could argue that they are completely different things, but ultimately they are just reflections of the same thing - the rainbow - that is the ultimate truth. So translate or dictate... it’s God’s way of speaking through him. Now feel the feels and come back to church.
Takes off TBM hat.
shudders
raeraex11 · 7 points · Posted at 04:48:18 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
That was disgustingly accurate. Go get some coffee, maybe some alcohol, and come back down here to outer darkness. You'll feel better.
Sansabina · 13 points · Posted at 00:12:36 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm not sure I understand the issue, it seems pretty obvious that they'd have to change it to "dictation" once the cat was out of the bag about the "face in the hat" thing. Clearly you can't be translating something just by staring into a hat with a stone without even having the source material present.
cmaury127 · 7 points · Posted at 03:17:02 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Not to mention the”plates” weren’t in even in the room when he “dictated “ them
PawlHDone · 4 points · Posted at 04:13:55 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
My nephew is a perfect example. I showed him the story and he said “Joseph was translating while dictating” 🙄🙄🙄
MagnetoRobotics · 3 points · Posted at 13:59:22 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Kinda not what dictating means, tho.
PawlHDone · 4 points · Posted at 14:44:59 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
That’s what I thought. Didn’t want to argue. Maybe he’ll figure it out one day.
MagnetoRobotics · 2 points · Posted at 15:30:06 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Right. Sometimes just letting people hear themselves outloud is enough.
[deleted] · 65 points · Posted at 18:08:37 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 36 points · Posted at 18:13:26 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I agree, but TBM’s are impossible to corner when confronted with facts. They just keep retreating. I can see it now: “I always knew he dictated it”, “why does it matter how it got done?” And all other sorts of bullshit. It amazes me how far they will go to convince themselves.
Word2daWise · 11 points · Posted at 23:41:51 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
You're amazed? Well, that's your choice...
("Choice" is one word that makes me want to punch TBMs right in their smugness).
clever_mormon_pun · 26 points · Posted at 18:16:34 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
So is the church going to bury this quote or pretend he meant something else all along?
Will this quote be "Anti-Mormon" in 2050?
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 19 points · Posted at 18:35:19 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
That’s the thing, with new “revelation” and the church being “restored” some more, they can change their narrative as much as they like and claim it’s either revelation or clarification.
exchurchemployee · 11 points · Posted at 23:16:06 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Wow, Now I know why Nelson tweeted last week about how the church is being restored everyday. He knew they were going to gaslight the old narrative.
Word2daWise · 10 points · Posted at 23:44:02 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
The old narrative was gaslighting. I'm not a fan of Nelson, and I've already resigned, but I am wondering if he's trying to straighten up the history and do a few no-brainer things like reducing church to two hours? Yes, he is a jerk. Not saying he isn't, but am starting to wonder the purpose of his actions.
halfweizen · 5 points · Posted at 00:23:56 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
They’ll just wrongly believe it always meant that God translated and Joseph dicktated.
Non-consensual______ · 35 points · Posted at 18:57:27 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Laban is non-consensually losing his head over this new angle. 🤯
lethargio13 · 7 points · Posted at 22:50:29 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It was more of a conscious uncoupling of his head and torso.
zMerovingian · 2 points · Posted at 14:49:52 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Non-consensual dismemberment?
Tidderring · 9 points · Posted at 18:29:08 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Does not matter, still -- with a watch in his pocket-- and Joseph Smith DID NOT NOTICE?
fuckthisthat · 95 points · Posted at 17:58:32 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Whenever I’ve dictated something. It’s something I wrote myself...
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 21 points · Posted at 18:15:09 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
See that’s what I thought as well lol
ParadoxN0W · 11 points · Posted at 23:36:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Well you must not be a channeler!
ShittyTBMResponsebot · 62 points · Posted at 20:11:53 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Sometimes you just gotta manipulate some of the facts to keep that trend alive.
bignerdmom · 27 points · Posted at 21:03:56 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
He really overestimates how many people care either way. There are so few people that care enough to actually research and tear down the BoM, the history of the church itself is so much more damning and interesting.
PikachuSaves · 8 points · Posted at 22:22:18 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
That's exactly why he had the talk on the BoM. He wants people (members) to only look at the BoM when it comes to believing in the church and Holland believes it's the strongest argument for the church being true (as opposed to early church history, doctrines of the prophets, etc)
connaught_plac3 · 2 points · Posted at 13:56:15 on November 18, 2018 · (Permalink)
It's like he's saying 'As long as just one of us refuses to acknowledge facts, this hoax will still stand! They can't say or do anything that will make us question our beliefs!'
exmothrowaway400 · 10 points · Posted at 00:23:19 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Well, that...and just because he CLAIMS it still stands doesn't make it so.
Is it still a book? Sure. Is it still published? At the cost of the lives of trees that could be better put to other use, if they have to be "used at all, yes.
THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT A FACTUAL ACCOUNT.
LePoopsmith · 3 points · Posted at 15:22:45 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
He's saying it just to prevent the tbms from checking to see if it really stands. "He said it, it's taken care of, so I don't need to research it." Worked on me for a long time till I actually researched it and saw that he was lying.
cronos844 · 4 points · Posted at 07:26:18 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
One wonders how exactly he thinks it still stands. In all seriousness, what is his actual defense.
5Monkeysjumpin · 33 points · Posted at 18:30:54 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I don’t understand how dictated is better for them?
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 47 points · Posted at 18:34:12 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I think that as the info found in the CES letter becomes more and more well known, they are changing the narrative in an effort to say they were right all along. Won’t work, in my opinion. Only the truly brainwashed will see this happening and accept it. The younger generations are seeing right through this bullshit
NoMoreAtPresent · 26 points · Posted at 20:02:56 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Seminary indoctrination / innoculation is working on my kids and in my community.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 12 points · Posted at 21:04:31 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Are you in Utah?
NoMoreAtPresent · 7 points · Posted at 21:58:24 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yes
TimmyTurnersLeftNut · 10 points · Posted at 22:41:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It's definitely not in mine. My seminary had about 3 kids stay active from the 30 or so that went.
NoMoreAtPresent · 2 points · Posted at 23:15:26 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Can you say what you're location is? Wasatch front (east?/west?)?
TimmyTurnersLeftNut · 4 points · Posted at 23:15:53 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm in New Mexico
frozetoze · 5 points · Posted at 01:45:59 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I lived in Happy Valley and I can think of a good number that were in my high school seminary that have since left the church. Granted, there were quite a few of us that were there by peer/parental pressure, not any desire to go.
5Monkeysjumpin · 5 points · Posted at 00:57:48 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Honestly, if I had been given the actual truth from a young age I very likely would have stayed. Very high probability.
leapoflogic · 3 points · Posted at 01:41:35 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Same.
crystalmerchant · 15 points · Posted at 21:31:09 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
See that's where you're wrong -- it's already working. The narrative has already changed se, will continue to change, and is having the desired effect: to make the Mormon experience more metaphorical such that it is harder to challenge in a rational / factual way.
It's just that this process is slow and will take a long long time
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 8 points · Posted at 21:39:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yeah I agree with you. I also think more and more people are leaving the church or at least questioning the church with all these changes.
Digirama · 3 points · Posted at 11:04:42 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
If the swing toward metaphorical interpretation went far enough, it would effectively soften everything. The less literal the interpretation of everything, the less rigid the culture. Word of wisdom wouldn't be so strictly enforced, the unspoken sense of prophetic infallibility would melt away, and the act of leaving the church wouldn't be such a major statement for the individual leaving or such a devastating loss to the family of said individual.
PayLayFail · 22 points · Posted at 18:52:24 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
"Dictation" allows them to slowly shift the narrative away from "translation" because all available evidence of Joe "Rape Train" Smith is that he had precisely zero ability to translate.
If God super seriously just whispered it in your ear, then seer stones and BoA and fake gold plates and kinderhook gets a back seat to
hearing voicesdivine inspiration.Raknarg · 9 points · Posted at 01:06:57 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I thought TBMs used the fact that he couldn't have translated them as evidence he has divine help?
AlreadyGone77 · 26 points · Posted at 18:38:07 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Because it's becoming more well known he never used the plates. No plates means no actual translation.
rightcalf · 9 points · Posted at 19:24:08 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It’s “better” in the sense that they no longer have any burden of proof to tie the text of the BoM to an original source. In a dictation narrative, the original source is inspiration/revelation instead of something tangible.
jrob801 · 6 points · Posted at 08:53:55 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
This is true, but it's a double edged sword. The claims of the BOM being a translated history of a real society are one of the big draws of mormonism. If they willfully back away from claims that it's a historically true work, and try to rely on metaphor and Joe Smith's powers of "revelation", they instantly become as much of a joke as Scientologists.
I'm not sure there's a middle ground here. If they back away from the claim that Joe translated ancient artifacts, they have a really hard time defending the truth claims of the BoM. The most classic anti-mormon argument comes from Revelations 22:18-19, wherein the bible is closed with an admonition not to add to it's works. Mormon's have sidestepped that by claiming the BoM isn't an addition to the bible, but a history of a different group of people in a different place. Change the narrative to make the story metaphorical, and they lose the claim. It becomes a very clear addition to the Bible.
after_all_we_can_do · 8 points · Posted at 22:21:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
"Dictation" allows for a divinely inspired text without (1) having to have actual plates that contained the text that JSJ dictated and (2) having to have historicity of everything that Joseph dictated. It allows for a hybrid of some history and some fiction or just entirely fiction, but (of course) all of it being divinely inspired from TSCC's point of view. I don't think TSCC wants to go to "entirely fiction" but "some fiction" allows for a helluva lot of wiggle room to dodge criticisms, though it raises others too.
A-few-months-shyof15 · 5 points · Posted at 13:28:23 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Does the introduction still have the “witnesses” part where they exclaim the truth about the plates?
after_all_we_can_do · 3 points · Posted at 16:53:37 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yeah, probably. TSCC would never go full "no plates". I think they would have to go with the expansion theory at most in which Joseph dictates some of the content of the plates and also provides additional content. It's hard to go fully "no plates" without running into the criticism you've raised.
5Monkeysjumpin · 3 points · Posted at 00:59:01 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So do you mean like he dictated what the spirit said to him?
after_all_we_can_do · 3 points · Posted at 02:11:29 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Not necessarily, The idea is that Joseph Smith receives inspiration, whether words or ideas or images in his head, and he dictates them to craft an inspired fiction (kinda like a parable but possibly with Joseph not realizing he is telling a parable) with some historical details received from revelation. Some apologists have an "expansion theory" where Joseph uses material from the plates but then expands it to include 19th century material and non-historical material. I haven't looked into the expansion theory because it seems like a desparate attempt to explain away the 19th century material and non-historical material, but I'll probably look into it eventually for some laughs.
5Monkeysjumpin · 6 points · Posted at 02:24:55 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Ohhhhhh 😕 What would be the difference the. I wonder between RLDS and LDS view on BOM? I was always taught growing up that RLDS just think that the Book of Mormon are nice stories to teach a lesson as opposed to LDS who believe it is literal and the people were real.
after_all_we_can_do · 2 points · Posted at 05:25:31 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I think Community of Christ currently allows its members to think whatever they want about BOM, historical or not. It doesn’t mandate historicity like TSCC does. TSCC might be moving towards something like that — but that’s a difficult pivot to pull off successfully. It may be that apologists like Brian Hales will have their pet theories on dictation without TSCC ever allowing active members to openly doubt BOM historicity.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 2 points · Posted at 05:44:25 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
"Expansion theory", eh? Interesting. Curious to see how they make that jibe with the whole "most correct book" claim.
after_all_we_can_do · 3 points · Posted at 16:57:11 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
The "correct" in "the most correct book" has always had enough wiggle room for apologists of TSCC to satisfy motivated TBM believers.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 3 points · Posted at 17:09:10 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm unceasingly astonished at the explanations that are invented by apologists and swallowed by believers. Reminds of a quote I heard recently: "Humans are not rational creatures, we are rationalizing creatures." (And this makes me question whether my own thinking is entirely rational...)
after_all_we_can_do · 3 points · Posted at 00:51:06 on November 17, 2018 · (Permalink)
In "The Righteous Mind", Jonathan Haidt argues that we emotionally reach conclusions and then use logic to justify those conclusions. We humans are all susceptible to this and critical thinking, to the extent we are able to practice it, is healthy.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 2 points · Posted at 00:53:32 on November 17, 2018 · (Permalink)
David Hume said the same kind of thing. Big fan of Jonathan Haidt. I should really read that book one of these days.
FHL88Work · 6 points · Posted at 00:39:38 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I don't get it either. It's easy to frame him reading words off the seer stone as "dictating" rather than translating, but what's the difference? We don't have the original plates to compare a translation on.
How does it help if he was dictating sheep and horses and barley and wheat that didn't exist in the Americas at that time? Or cureloms, cumoms and Adieu?
whiteLamanite · 24 points · Posted at 19:20:01 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
When it comes down to it, I don't think most TBMs care if JS dictated or translated the BoM. TBMs have a testimony in the truthfulness of the BoM, it makes them feel warm and fuzzy. The vocabulary surrounding the how the book came to be doesn't matter, because TBMs have faith it is a book from God.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 10 points · Posted at 21:32:53 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Plus now they can claim the kinderhook plates were him trying to translate as a man, and for the Book of Mormon he was “inspired as a prophet to dictate” or some shit like that.
ThrowawayLDS_7gen · 3 points · Posted at 06:54:07 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Spouse says he had to dictate them to the scribe so they could write it down and by the end he didn't need the hat, stone, urim and thum, etc because he "learned" how to "translate" by then.
Bought it, hook, line, and sinker.
🤦
tacklebox · 46 points · Posted at 18:13:19 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
So where does the talking salamander fit in again?
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 22 points · Posted at 18:17:10 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Somewhere deep in Elder Oaks subconsciousness so he can hide from it, right next to the fact that he and Rusty have inappropriately touched each other a time or two in their excitement over these new “revelations”
crystalmerchant · 5 points · Posted at 21:28:41 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It does the dictating
tacklebox · 3 points · Posted at 21:34:06 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
And thats onto the serving platter or off the platter?
freedommama · 19 points · Posted at 21:30:19 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Convert here....when I started taking the missionary discussions/going to church I had to learn a whole new vocabulary. Vision, translate by the power of God, Stake Center, Fireside, Heavenly Father, Priesthood, Melchizedek, Aaronic, garments, ordinance, sealing, patriarch, sacrament, repent, petting 🤮, how to pray “properly”, eternity, funeral potatoes, all the whack ass BoM names, etc etc etc.
DICTATE/DICTATION were never on the list of new vocabulary. Not once. It doesn’t even fit into the Mormon file in my brain. I have to attempt to add it, to stretch the boundaries of my 30 year old Mormon vocab file to make it fit.
This is total bullshit.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 14 points · Posted at 21:41:23 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
God the vocabulary is ridiculous. it’s so weird to catch yourself making a comment to a nevermo about a stake or a elders quorum or some weird shit like that. Never once in my life growing up in the heart of the Utah did I hear dictate. It was ALWAYS translate. Crazy.
Word2daWise · 7 points · Posted at 23:52:00 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I had to learn the same new list of useless words. Well, the word "petting" was around years ago, but the dumbass terms like stake, ward, elders' quorum (when they are the young ones), "high" priest (aren't we soooo modest!), "visiting teacher" and "home teacher," etc.
Never made sense to me that young missionaries are "elders," then there's the EQ, then nobody is called an "Elder" for a long while, then the GAs (yet another term) are called "Elder." But year, it was always "translated." Never heard "dictated."
Can you believe we put up with this stupidity? Cult, cult, cult!
[deleted] · 17 points · Posted at 18:28:36 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
[deleted]
rjschwerin · 5 points · Posted at 18:41:25 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Happy cake day
bananajr6000 · 14 points · Posted at 20:30:13 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
So Hales is branching out from proving that Smith Jr was a serial adulterer through his illegal polygamous and polyandrous marriages and moving on to try to reconcile the BoM as fiction.
Good job, Brian! You will get even more people to leave the church through your shitty and unbelievable excuses!
___Shawn · 12 points · Posted at 19:43:30 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
To be fair, someone could both translate and dictate at the same time.
NotTerriblyHelpful · 7 points · Posted at 21:15:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is freaking out about this. Did any of you bother to look at the article? It says that the Book of Mormon was "translated" by the gift and power of God. Joseph dictated the book whether it was revealed or translated (or made up). Brian Hales, the author, is commenting on the process of dictation, not on the genesis of the text.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 9 points · Posted at 21:36:30 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Yeah it’s more the fact that they choose to use the word dictate now in the title. Every Mormon grew up talking about how Joseph “translated”, which denotes a direct translation from one language to another. We know he didn’t even look at the plates when he was translating though, so that doesn’t add up and most Mormons don’t even know that. It’s just another example of gaslighting in my opinion.
BOBauthor · 14 points · Posted at 22:38:27 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
If it wasn't translated, why were the plates needed at all?
Mormonismisntanism · 6 points · Posted at 06:58:00 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So much this. Once the church concedes (a) that he didn’t translate and (b) he didn’t therefore need the plates, and therefore (c) the Book of Mormon is fiction rather than history, the plates are irrelevant. That’s good for the church, right?
Wrong.
Where did the plates come from?
Who buried them?
If they were unnecessary because it’s all just inspired scripture, why the narrative about the plates at all? What the hell did Mormoni drag them all over North America for?
The result is catastrophic for the church. If the book is ahistorical, there WERE. NO. PLATES. Or if there were, Joseph made them himself. And in either case, he lied about their provenance.
GBH was right. Either the Book of Mormon is what it claims to be or it’s a massive fraud. They can sugar coat it all they want and try to change the narrative, but the cost is to eventually have to admit that insofar as the BofM is concerned, Joseph Smith was a fraud.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 4 points · Posted at 05:47:59 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Why did Moroni spend so much time and effort carting those heavy plates around so he could find a place to bury them?
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 3 points · Posted at 00:44:56 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Exactly!
[deleted] · 10 points · Posted at 18:41:55 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
[deleted]
bananajr6000 · 1 points · Posted at 20:26:32 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
That’s a fable:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog
captcrashidaho · 8 points · Posted at 19:44:54 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Maybe "channeled" would work.
AncientMaize · 10 points · Posted at 20:40:59 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Wow.
This corporation literally has no dignity.
ur_not_th_boss_of_me · 7 points · Posted at 18:39:55 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
What will they say when it’s proven he didn’t know enough to dictate it either?
apawst8 · 6 points · Posted at 19:02:08 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Huh? It's well known that he used scribes. And the only way to use scribes is to dictate.
Dictate is a broad enough term to encompass translation of plates, use of a rock in a hat, or telling a story to the scribes.
ur_not_th_boss_of_me · 2 points · Posted at 20:55:51 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I see your point. I was thinking of the other favorite word they use “inspired + translation”... but I see now OP only used translation in this discussion, which is still the same as dictate. My misunderstanding and inserting deep rooted Mormon vocabulary from my head into this conversation.
[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 19:54:07 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Here’s the article
http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568
HotKarl_Marx · 8 points · Posted at 21:37:57 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Well, ya know... Reformed Egyptian is mighty hard to read....
PodSixWasJerks · 7 points · Posted at 02:49:30 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
"Hi, we're here from the moving company. We got a call about some goal posts."
that_snarky_one · 7 points · Posted at 20:00:45 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I thought they were moving away from the narrative that the BOM was historically true. Why does ‘dictated’ vs. ‘translated’ matter in this sense? Wouldn’t ‘dictated’ double down on the historical truth claims?
[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 21:49:27 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
Nevermo here: Isn't the whole head in the hat thing in the church essays?? Or am I remembering wrong?
But can't people just say now "if it was dictated correctly" Vs what they usually say "translated correctly"
sensationalist3 · 6 points · Posted at 22:33:08 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
The two aren't mutually exclusive. And like others have already mentioned, TBM's will continue believing despite what verbiage the church decides to use.
But yep, you're right. The church released an essay (fairly recently) that basically acknowledged the whole head in the hat thing. They of course won't use any images to depict this, especially given the number of official church images they have of Joseph Smith translating the BOM with the plates in front of him.
Lola_Pees_Twice · 5 points · Posted at 23:34:33 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
....while wearing the Urim and Thummin as glasses.
HoneyWhereAreUrPants · 6 points · Posted at 23:18:25 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Prophet, seer and dictator.
BoniMoroni · 6 points · Posted at 02:20:51 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
They backed far away from him being the Author.
They backed far away from knowing who the Lamanites are.
Maybe leadership has taken to wearing hats again but forgot to take out the rock before putting them on their head?
Crueger2312 · 5 points · Posted at 21:53:14 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Would somebody kindly explain to me the difference between dictating the plates and translating the plates. I'm aware of the definitions of each word, but for some reason I cannot understand how this is a big thing when it comes to Joseph Smith and the plates. Thank you in advance!!
homesteadfoxbird · 5 points · Posted at 23:11:36 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
It’s a change in vernacular after nearly 200 years of using only one word: translate. Apologists stretch this word thin by using it to encompass multiple meanings (none of which are a standard definition of translation) as it has become more and more clear that JS didn’t translate shit.
So the word translation no longer means to translate. And now they have dropped that word after 200 years and are giving it a new word: dictation, which can be much more forgiving in its definition. They can use that wording to say that it was never translated from plates (because it wasn’t), instead it was dictated to Joseph Smith from God directly through a stone in a hat. The plates become unnecessary in this narrative. And this dictation narrative is closer to the truth so it takes wind out of critics sails and the church can say “nothing to see here, we’ve never claimed he translated, he was clearly always dictating from this rock via the spirit.
This also lays a path for the book of Abraham to be claimed as dictated inspiration, instead of a direct translation of the scrolls.
Crueger2312 · 6 points · Posted at 23:28:32 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Thank you for the clear explanation. Now it is much more clear! This is just beyond nonsense in regards to the church pulling this off. It makes me feel more validated in leaving.
sensationalist3 · 2 points · Posted at 22:42:46 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
The title of the article is slightly misleading. The author still mentions that he translated the book, but the actual dictation is simply the process they used (in this case, Joseph Smith looking at the stone and reading aloud the words he saw).
Crueger2312 · 2 points · Posted at 23:28:56 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Okay, okay... I'm seeing the full picture now. I appreciate the help. :-)
66o4dP73pb7 · 6 points · Posted at 22:06:16 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
I'm afraid you are in error. The record shows that Joey dictated the story while looking in his hat and using his magic rock. IIRC, It is not firmly established that the plates were even present while Joey dictated the story. The church has no explanation if or how the alleged gold plates influenced Joey's utterances at all. That "church" basically implies that Joey had some kind of mystical communion with them. If you read carefully, the golden plates could have stayed buried and Joey could have done his Vulcan mind-meld with them anyway.
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 2 points · Posted at 02:48:09 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Understood, but it’s not taught like this at all. People grow up with images of Joseph literally translating from the plates. Will crack some shelves I hope.
ThrowawayLDS_7gen · 2 points · Posted at 06:59:43 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I'm sure Moroni would be pissed about all the effort he put into dragging those plates around.
connaught_plac3 · 2 points · Posted at 14:10:42 on November 18, 2018 · (Permalink)
You are hired sir! Please report to the correlation department for chip implant and barcode tattoo, then we will release you on the interwebs.
AnticipatingLunch · 6 points · Posted at 23:54:58 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
And yet they still don’t realize that they’re even more fucked by the “God dictated the BoM to Joseph in the hat” method than by a potentially flawed/fuzzy translation.
Now they’re stuck with steel and horses and silk and wild castrated oxen. Life will find a way.
Veiled_Aiel · 5 points · Posted at 01:38:45 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Can someone explain the controversy to me? I feel like I was always taught that he both translated AND dictated the plates. What is actually going on here?
[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 22:40:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
BOM was supposed to be "absolutely correct" and was not mistranslated, as was always vehemently stated by the members of the ward I grew up in, and is backed up by the book itself.
Any change to this admits only one thing, if you still want to believe, then you now have to believe GOD IS JUST A TROLL! He screwed with the original translation, stating it was correct, let us believe that for a long ass time, and then came back like "LOLs gAIZE!!! I GOTTED U!!!"
That's God now.
WhiteNerdyDelitesome · 2 points · Posted at 05:53:15 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Came here to say this. Article of Faith #8 casts doubt on the Bible by adding that "as far as it is translated correctly" caveat, but I was taught that anything written by ol' Joe was supposed to be the pure, unblemished, word of God. (Cute confidence trick, there.) Now they want to tell us "Oh, nvmnd, the BofM has problems to, but no big. Just trust us." Please.
ariagrayx · 3 points · Posted at 02:05:00 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
God is the ultimate troll
johndehlinmademedoit · 4 points · Posted at 23:05:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Man, fuck Brian Hales!
Katiedid55 · 4 points · Posted at 23:36:17 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Link? I looked for it but it seems they took it down. I want to show my mom. Her shelf is close to breaking I think this could give it some good cracks.
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 01:18:29 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568
BotoxedBrethren · 2 points · Posted at 04:19:46 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Interesting reading this article they say all the “right” things to in no way make it sound like it was 1000000% made up.
ThrowawayLDS_7gen · 2 points · Posted at 06:58:15 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I just found it buried on page 3.
Katiedid55 · 2 points · Posted at 07:15:38 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Thanks
jamauss · 3 points · Posted at 00:15:28 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So after this oh-so-impressive translation or dictation or whatever - why did Joseph try and go up north and sell the rights to the copyright of the book? Which angel was it that told him to do that?
gimme a break
A-few-months-shyof15 · 2 points · Posted at 13:38:37 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Joseph trying to sell the rights is the item that made me stop and exclaim, “Holy shit, it’s all made up”.
Who the hell would dictate/translate words straight from god and then turn around and try to sell the rights? Totally absurd.
Nootnootordermormon · 5 points · Posted at 00:31:27 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Fuckin...Holy clickbait, Batman...
Sasquatch-Cain · 3 points · Posted at 00:37:25 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Brian Hales = knows a lot = seems stupid
Raknarg · 3 points · Posted at 01:05:47 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
What does this serve whether it was translated?
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 01:11:33 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
It must be exhausting to be Brian C. Hales.
wbbm · 4 points · Posted at 02:51:51 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So if Joseph dictated through the stone that we still have, why doesn't the prophet now use it and dictate some more? I think most TBMs will get to this place and cause a lot of issues.
MrSwuft · 6 points · Posted at 03:06:00 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Am I going crazy or is there absolutely no mention of the golden plates in the text of the article at all?
http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568
🎙️ osama_is_dead88 · 3 points · Posted at 06:40:49 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
You’re right. Wow. Seems like that’s the next thing to be covered up in their story. No more golden plates??
honeyhamm16 · 3 points · Posted at 23:49:49 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Wooooooooooooooooooow
alicenotinwonder2 · 3 points · Posted at 00:26:17 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Mother fuckers.
r1pcur113 · 3 points · Posted at 01:10:35 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Or just rightfully deliver it as it is. Joseph was the author.
Ribbitygirl · 3 points · Posted at 02:29:05 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Isn't plagiarism still plagiarism even if it's dictated? /s
MoMissionarySC · 3 points · Posted at 02:49:42 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I think this is a somewhat sidestep in the right direction -_-
but
It's my hope that maybe MAYBE in 10ish 20ish years we can finally end these vague charades as a religion and move forward with a full blow reformation...
One that is inclusive of all sexes, genders, and persuasions Recognizes love as the pillar of our religion And one that apologizes for our organizations past transgressions.....
Pipe Dreams are fun.
If that happens I'd be happy to come back....until then Fuck OFF TSCC
PayLeyAle · 3 points · Posted at 12:37:52 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
"Why Joseph Smiths Scrying of the book of mormon..."
Peering into a stone and seeing shit is called "Scrying" Brian Hales , you know that nonsense conmen used to trick the gullible.
stephers1313 · 3 points · Posted at 16:57:31 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
So it's not "translated" anymore its "dictated"? That's A HUGE FUCKING DIFFERENCE!!!
Me_Anon_Truth · 3 points · Posted at 17:41:57 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Why did he even need the plates then?! Even more then the rock in the hat...this makes no sense.
WeaverFan420 · 3 points · Posted at 00:14:05 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Here's why it's jaw-dropping - it has led to numerous deaths, rapes, suffering, pain, family quarrels/division, garments, and much more unfortunate side effects. All because of Joseph Smith.
Verumestamendacium · 2 points · Posted at 21:06:38 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
I love how comments have to be sent...you can't just comment and have them show up.
bikesnguns · 2 points · Posted at 22:51:29 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Here's a link to the actual article:
http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568 with the whole, 'He never had his last paragraph repeated' BS that is always spouted. All the players in the BOM are dead so we can't get the truth from them, but given what all of JS's neighbors said about him, I have often wondered how many people were involved in writing the Book of Mormon. In one John Dehlin interview it was stated that the list included Lucy Mack and that Emma knew about it.
WhereRtheTacos · 2 points · Posted at 23:00:48 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
That’s insane. Man. Guess we will see how far they take it.
Word2daWise · 2 points · Posted at 23:40:02 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
So, how are they going to spin the non-existent gold plates?
microsuperman · 2 points · Posted at 00:00:49 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Could somebody give me a TLDR of the article?
[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 01:19:38 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
http://www.ldsliving.com/Why-Joseph-Smiths-Dictation-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-Is-Simply-Jaw-Dropping/s/89568
It’s pretty short article
higherthenkolob · 2 points · Posted at 04:01:58 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
How could an uneducated 12 year old dictate a book...
adamaska86 · 2 points · Posted at 04:29:36 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Does anyone a link to this article? I'm finding it difficult to search the site without becoming angry
TheNewNameIsGideon · 2 points · Posted at 05:09:49 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
I don't know what to think.
It's astonishing that Mormons can be lead astray so easily!
itsfinalgirl_ · 2 points · Posted at 06:00:05 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Created by Joseph could be more accurate, but probably the guy who wrote A view of Hebrews need to have his copyrights.
d_nukedorf · 2 points · Posted at 07:23:37 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)*
who the hell is Brian C. Hales?
I never heard of him...
fairmormon says he's an anesthesiologist that's best known for writing a book about mormons. great, cause that's what I look for in an anesthesiologist: being an author of religious books.
Searchfortruth1 · 2 points · Posted at 07:45:14 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Brian Hale’s is so deceiving that he had fooled himself to believe the lies
Just like JS convinced himself to believe his own lies
Hale’s like JS
[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 11:10:27 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Instead of translated or dictated they should just used the word inspired. Before I left I was thinking how much better it would be if they just admitted it wasnt real history but an inspired work.
That was, of course, before I new everything else was rubbish too.
piethetype · 2 points · Posted at 13:37:35 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Still doubling down on the “un educated, country bumpkin dumb shit theory”.
Still taking Emma’s “word” as the Gospel truth! Both JS and Emma are documented liars!! They both lied through their dam teeth about polygamy and I’m sure many other facts.
Now the fact that they were lying for the lord is some how ok but nonetheless they lied and they lied convincingly. (Just got to know when they are lying)
So Maybe they were trying to start a church to make a living????
Joseph was a convincing con man. I.e. Joseph: to Heber (Kimball) “I need to have your dear wife as my (inset number ) wife it is the lords commandment!!” After much fretting and despair, Heber; says “ok you can have her!”
Joseph “it was just a test”. Heber “oh thank god”. Joseph: “but I will take your teen age daughter”. Heber: oh no problem!” Thanks for the salvation.
The simplest most plausible explanation is that they formed a church cobbled together with ideas they liked and most importantly ideas that sold to people of that era. Now since it got off the ground It has been modified and tweaked so that it will continue to sell. History sells. History and artifacts sell. History, artifacts and mystic explanations sell even better!!
Preaching is a damn good way to make a living if you have the talent to talk, and inspire. Joseph, and the current leaders, have all of those talents in spades!
The product is polygamist sex, spiritual prowess( you can know shit and be guided by god!) and pure political power. Add in some salvation for the masses and by god it is some good shit!!
x-intercept · 1 points · Posted at 23:11:58 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
This angers me
Praise_to_the_Pasta · 1 points · Posted at 00:30:45 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Un-fucking-believable.
bonne_vie · 1 points · Posted at 05:14:12 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
Jaw dropping?
Isn't that click bait??
Ms-angrybunny · 1 points · Posted at 21:36:34 on November 22, 2018 · (Permalink)
Isn't this proof that Leaders know TSCC is a complete fraud? I say it is!
_The_Messenger · -8 points · Posted at 18:58:42 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
They have always said that he dictated it to someone who was writing it down. Rock-in-hat or plates. Your claim is void. Did you even read the article? lol.
First rule of argumentation: Know what the fk you are talking about.
oh-my-heck · 11 points · Posted at 19:41:06 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
You have interesting people skills.
freedommama · 8 points · Posted at 21:34:50 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Bullshit. Have you ever heard a missionary use the word “dictate” in any of the discussions? Nope.
SisterJohn · 6 points · Posted at 19:48:16 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)
Obviously he didn't translate it, whether you are a believer or a non believer, he either dictated it using magical means or he sat down with Co conspirators making the whole shit up. But either way he wasn't translating it. Which begs the question wtf does everyone say he did?
freedommama · 1 points · Posted at 22:01:42 on November 15, 2018 · (Permalink)*
.
DerTeufelsVerteidigr · 1 points · Posted at 01:54:03 on November 16, 2018 · (Permalink)
FWIW, I agree that the article isn't the angle that this thread is making it out to be. It's focusing on the mechanics of the dictation process as evidence that it was a translation vs. he was just making it up. This isn't anything new.
Apparently, if you start back up right where you left off, that's evidence that it came from God! (Or that he was reading from a pre-written draft. Which would be consistent with accounts that day he would spell out words he couldn't pronounce.)