I am a former Bishop who has been been down the rabbit hole for 1 year and sent this e-mail below to my Stake President. I guess there is no going back now...thoughts?

[deleted] · 589 points · Posted at 07:50:11 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*


[deleted]

[deleted] · 127 points · Posted at 08:21:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very very good and more concise than my letter! You are clearly coming from a sincere place.

It is not just the sexist polygamy and shocking polyandry; its not just the 100 years of institutional racism; its not just the false translation of the Book of Abraham and Kinderhook Plates; its not just the lack of archaeological, anthropological, and linguistic evidence for the Book of Mormon; it's not just the un-explainable anachronisms within the Book of Mormon; it not just the confusingly identical FreeMason & LDS Temple ordinances; its not just the contradictory versions of the First Vision; its not just the confusing timeline fact of the First Vision, and angelic appearance of John, Peter, James and John being left out of the Book of Commandments; its not just that Joseph Smith disobeyed every rule in Section 132; its not just the mind-blowing Mark Hoffman affair; not just the worst terrorist attack in US History (Mountain Meadow Massacre); not just the ungodly and un-Christlike fear and persecution of LGBT members...it is obviously the shear weight of all of it combined that makes me doubt. I hope that makes sense.

That's the paragraph that we all include. I was bemused and amused to find that every person who read my letter said, "I already knew all that stuff and I'm fine with it... how did you not know that stuff? Maybe they were teaching things differently when you went to church." It's a blatant lie. They literally scan over that stuff and have this vague dark cloud arise that they use as blinders. They do NOT know that stuff. What is usually true is that they are aware that there's something they heard about that once [OR never heard of it] but think there are probably answers to it and they're positive they could solve it if they did a little research. = putting it on the shelf. I am so tired of people looking at a list like that and literally saying "I know all that and I have no issue with it." BULLSHIT!

RaggedShell · 79 points · Posted at 09:52:49 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is what DW said about a lot of my concerns. I know she didn’t know this stuff. That is why I am going to make a church history test and make people take it before debating church history with me. After they fail it miserably they can’t make as many stupid excuses.

ShaqtinADrool · 41 points · Posted at 15:56:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

church history test

Please name just 3 of Joseph Smith's plural "wives."

This usually does the trick.

False_Grit · 27 points · Posted at 16:08:58 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol. One of the most damning things to me is the "Year of Polygamy" podcast.....and it is literally just biographies of Joseph Smith's wives. Once those women became real names and people to me instead of this vague notion, there was no going back.

Ironic that family history biographies are so damning to the church.

Yobispo · 4 points · Posted at 01:19:31 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

It was a huge help to me as well. LHP is a hero.

kurinbo · 7 points · Posted at 20:44:33 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Anyone with even the most rudimentary knowledge should at least get Fanny, Eliza, and Helen...

[deleted] · 18 points · Posted at 16:58:48 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I did this to my wife when she told me she'd already looked at "all that stuff". I said, "Ok, who was Helen Mar Kimball? Who was John D. Lee? What was the Nauvoo Expositor?" while she just stood there with a blank expression. "Exactly".

Still-ILO · 8 points · Posted at 18:21:28 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Same thing with my DW. She "already knew all that stuff", besides, it's all true because God told her so, but when I told her about the rock in the hat trick, it was total deer in the headlights. No clue.

"I already know about all that stuff" basically translates to they've heard of the Adam-God theory, and that's about it. Viola, they're experts on anti-Mormon lies.

greenpanda419 · 5 points · Posted at 21:27:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Or they know that BY practiced polygamy... and that blacks didn't have the priesthood before 1978.

[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 16:56:36 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is why I am going to make a church history test and make people take it before debating church history with me.

I've found that the best test from my experience is polygamy. If they are still rationalizing polygamy then they aren't ready. If they can acknowledge that polygamy is a problem then you've got a chance at a rational discussion.

[deleted] · 11 points · Posted at 15:50:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do it:) A test to be given prior to discussion! I look forward

-g-u-n-s-l-i-n-g-e-r · 9 points · Posted at 14:10:57 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

great idea

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 22:36:22 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great idea! Please share when you're done. It will be like balderdash. No one will fall for the crazy answer and then they'll be shocked when they all end up being true.... ;) Honestly though, this is a great idea. I might start working on one myself. Love it! :P

Itsarockinahat · 1 points · Posted at 17:20:28 on December 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really hope you do make a quiz. I'm a sucker for internet quizzes. :)

[deleted] · 34 points · Posted at 13:03:47 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

When I read that "don't have a problem with it" line, I want to shake them and say "HOW CAN YOU NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT??"

sethra007 · 32 points · Posted at 14:12:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

NeverMo here. FWIW, the Mormon reaction to some of the institutionlized racism in their church reminds me of an interaction myself and couple of other people had with someone on another sub.

The issue of certain types of racism came up in context of the main post, and one user mentioned that he had a friend who seemed to be getting involved in some odd beliefs about white people being 'outbred' by other races. He mentioned that his friend had urged him to Google a certain term (I won't mention it here), and several other users (including myself) pointed out that the term wasn't just a casual one. If he knew it and he bought into its meaning, that meant his friend was pretty far down a very ugly, deeply racist white supremicist/neo-Nazi road.

The user's response was, "well, yeah, but I'm not going to end a years-long friendship over some silly racist shit."

Someone replied, "That's almost exactly what Dylann Roof's best friend said", and linked him to an interview with some buddy of Roof's who didn't take Roof's comments seriously, even Roof's comments escalated to him actually telling the friend of the plans to shoot up that black church (and if it's the buddy I'm thinking of, he's going to prison for not taking Roof seriously).

This user seemed to think his friend was exploring some sort of garden-variety racism that's insensitive but ultimately harmless in a direct way. He didn't want to throw over a positive long-term relationship for that.

I think that's what's in the mindset of a lot of Mormons. For them, the racism of the LDS all just some "silly racist shit" that's in the past. They aren't aware of the very real harm it caused (and arguably continues to cause). That makes it easy to minimize it. And as long as they feel they have a positive relationship with the church, they won't end that relationship over it.

[deleted] · 22 points · Posted at 14:23:54 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You're right. I think in the same case that it just hasn't happened to them personally yet. Relatively speaking, it's easier for a 5th-generation Mormon with Swedish ancestors to overlook that racist past because it never affected them, or anyone in their family. It's history.

To be fair, it never happened to me or anyone in my family either, and as wrong as I think it is, it was not my propelling factor for leaving. It took having a gay child to make me do that.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 22:15:07 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. I stated explicitly that he coerced a 14-year-old into marrying him, and that reading her journal distressed me to the point that I would never come back to the church even if everything else was true (my thinking is "eff the god that would make someone do that. He can strike me down if he wants. He's not my god."). And stated that the translation of the Abrahamic drawings that we STILL have published in our scriptures is completely wrong, and that he drew in the missing pieces incorrectly... and that the same picture has been found, but complete and correct, numerous other places. Plus like 6 other MAJOR things. And they say "I knew that and I'm fine with it."

BULL.

SHIT.

If you knew it, you wouldn't be fine with it.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 00:13:16 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

It almost seems a point of pride for them. Like, how much crappy history can you know about and still remain an active member?

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 05:20:37 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Lol! That's so true. I used to laugh when people would make fun of our polygamy and I'd point out that there's a portrait in the JS building of Brigham and all his wives and we're not ashamed of it. And yet... no one told me about all of JOSEPH'S wives.... suspicious.

seventhvision · 6 points · Posted at 02:15:35 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can't have a problem with something you know nothing about. I think many mormons intentionally stay in the dark.

When I was young my mother was big on the idea that you'll only be judged for what you know and then turned against. This seemed to be a big thing in the 60's and 70's.

I figured the less I read and knew about, the less i'd suffer in the next life. I know that a lot of members had the same attitude. If you think about it, it's a great idea if you want to keep people entrapped in a religion that's pure BS.

I think that idea and teaching is why so many who came up in the church during the 50's-80's knew so little. That and most of it was easy for the church to hide.

They never saw the internet and thirst for knowledge coming at them like a hurricane. They didn't even bother to hunker down and protect themselves. The leaders are like the braindead surfers you see running into the surf during a hurricane. They think they're all that and then some.

[deleted] · 24 points · Posted at 14:51:02 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the best example of this is polygamy. "I already knew about polygamy and it doesn't bother me." Well, did you know that Joseph sent men on missions and married their wives while they were gone? Did you know that Joseph and many other leaders publicly lied about polygamy? Did you know that Brigham inherited some of Joseph's wives like property as his successor? Did you know that the Utah territory actually had more men than women, meaning polygamy as a demographic necessity (what I was taught my whole life) doesn't even make sense?

They know about "the issues" in that they know a perceived problem exists, but they have no idea how deep the problem goes.

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 17:18:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. People who say polygamy is fine are people who don't even think clearly. It only takes a few seconds to examine the idea from a logical and philosophical perspective, and you realize how fucked up it is. It's especially disturbing when women are okay with it, considering polygamy is a serious abuse primarily of them. The shit that Joe and Brigham were doing is just more icing on the cake.

Claire3577 · 7 points · Posted at 22:20:45 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes, but we were coming from the absolute belief that the church was true so we had to make everything else fit. And so we think, "well, we can't understand, we're only mortal," etc.

When I was young I hated polygamy and had many talks with my own mother about it. (We are descended from polygamy and so my mother made me aware of at least Joe and Brigham and our ancestor.) She was convinced it was what was right, and she did her very best to convince me that it was what was right.
My dad made sure that we kids knew that the church was not a buffet. You could not pick and choose what to believe and/or follow, and what to put aside. You had to believe it all and embrace it all, even.

I didn't like it, but believed my parents. I wasn't okay with it, per se, but I felt I had to come to terms with it and accept it.

I despised it, while at the same time believed it.

seventhvision · 1 points · Posted at 02:50:49 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's the same as if a black person today said they were fine with the President of the United States having slaves. Not only that, he had sex with many of them against their will.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 22:06:34 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well, did you know that Joseph sent men on missions and married their wives while they were gone?

Okay, I have this friend. He got baptized finally after 6 years of study and skepticism and that's when I met him. But he was pretty edgy and didn't seem THAT active. We would get together occasionally and one time he started telling me about the stuff he'd discovered after he got baptized. He specifically pointed out this one. He said "Look Laurel, I have done my studying. I know my stuff. Joseph Smith took mens' wives after sending them out on missions." And I just laughed good-naturedly and said "oh, I doubt that... I'm sure there was a good reason for it, like they needed taking care of while he was gone." HA! I was that person! It was totally easy for me to ignore that. My crisis of faith came later, and this friend was probably the 2nd person I told.

Did you know that the Utah territory actually had more men than women, meaning polygamy as a demographic necessity (what I was taught my whole life) doesn't even make sense?

I STILL didn't know that! Rar!! THIS. This this this.

Knowing women now, and researching them then, I'm starting to realize women can take care of themselves just as well, if not better, than a lot of men! That was always the excuse I used as a teen to my friends. "Women couldn't own land, women needed manly protection, women this women that" and I completely justified polygamy.

kurinbo · 5 points · Posted at 20:53:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

What I knew as a convert TBM and (later) NOM:

Well, did you know that Joseph sent men on missions and married their wives while they were gone?

I didn't find that out until near the end.

Did you know that Joseph and many other leaders publicly lied about polygamy?

I knew that. (I read all seven volumes of the History of the Church within a year of joining.)

Did you know that Brigham inherited some of Joseph's wives like property as his successor?

I knew he married a lot of them.

Did you know that the Utah territory actually had more men than women, meaning polygamy as a demographic necessity (what I was taught my whole life) doesn't even make sense?

I knew that was likely. (I took a class in college where I learned that women were a rarity on frontiers, including American ones, so I assumed that was likely to be the case in Utah Territory as well.)

seventhvision · 2 points · Posted at 02:22:31 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

That, and they don't want to know. They will be more than happy to shoot the messenger.

[deleted] · 14 points · Posted at 08:24:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for the validation. I hear the same thing. Astonishing.

[deleted] · 15 points · Posted at 14:24:26 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 22:07:03 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. It all gets to be too much. That's why the CES Letter is so effective.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:14:41 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I've yet to meet a Mormon that knows any of these things. Some have heard the head in the hat thing, but they all assume it originated from South Park. So when you bring them up, everyone so far has been caught entirely off-guard.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 20:50:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Now, they're starting to publish these things on the website. It's very tricky and very dangerous. Because then Mormons say "well, if it was on the website, I guess they have nothing to hide...." and the lines get more and more blurred.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 17:43:38 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You guys should just agree w your wives that polygamy isn’t a prob and tell her about some nice 15 y o you have married like the prophet. Or sisters. The man did like sisters.

hopeimright · 2 points · Posted at 18:27:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you! This is quite frustrating. The devil is in the details with the issues. People have no idea until they learn specifics.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 21:39:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. And we all know because we've been on the other side of it -- ignoring legitimate concerns and assuming there was a solution somewhere out there. They are purposely choosing not to look into those details. It really takes a "crisis of faith" -- finally acknowledging that MAYBE, just maybe, there is a possibility that it's not true. For me, until I had that crisis of faith, I heard things like "Joseph Smith stole wives" and came up with justifications.

BrokeDickTater · 60 points · Posted at 08:09:25 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

a chocolate colored egg rock that he put in a hat and that it glowed the words until the scribe wrote them down

This should be enough for most rational people right there. I mean, seriously, your whole religion is founded around a guy looking at a magic rock in a hat ? Fucking please.

daveescaped · 52 points · Posted at 10:39:38 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

A rock in a hat that he had previously admitted under oath to being part of a con.

Stuboysrevenge · 14 points · Posted at 13:07:43 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Under oath? I knew he said something to Emma's father, it at least Emma's father said he did, but when did he admit fraudulence under oath?

exmos_gf · 34 points · Posted at 13:42:56 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

He was convicted in court in 1826, and the actual court record was found in the 1970's: http://www.utlm.org/onlinebooks/changech4.htm

False_Grit · 8 points · Posted at 16:10:50 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Every time I come here I learn something new. Thanks exmos!

daveescaped · 2 points · Posted at 12:55:45 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

You may be right. I may have conflated the statements made under oath in the link with his admission to Emma.

He was convicted and he did admit it was part of a con but the two actions were not one and the same.

iambookus · 9 points · Posted at 14:14:51 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Total bullshit. Now if you have time, I have some ocean front property in Arizona. It's a fantastic investment opportunity. I Found out about it when I accidentally fell and hit my head on a tabloid rack... The rest you probably wouldn't believe. So how about it? You in?

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 16:01:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

Well their was ocean in Arizona at one time. So it's true.

[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 08:22:35 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 17:20:58 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exactly. But according to apologists it's "sacred", which somehow means that something that's weird as fuck is okay as long as we don't talk about it a lot.

oalders · 5 points · Posted at 20:29:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't know if the rock itself is any stranger than a lot of the stuff you need to buy into already if you're going to believe. It is problematic on a lot of levels, though.

ExMorgMD · 46 points · Posted at 10:30:26 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

First off, I empathize with your distress. If you were anything like me (like many of us), the LDS church was one of the most (if not THE most) important things in your life. For me at least, every major life decision was made while considering what my duty to the church was. Your plans for the future, plans for your children, plans for you and your spouse were wrapped up in your duty and life in the church.

To be faced with the prospect that something you have devoted so many hours, tears, sweat, and dollars too is a fraud is a terrifying and earth shattering concept so, let me say, you are not alone.

I know that you are desperately looking for some piece of information that makes all of your issues fit within the framework of a "true church".

I am sad to say that it doesn't.

If I can be clairvoyant enough to predict your Stake President's response (if there even is one). He may "counsel" you to stop looking so much into these issues. Stop reading "church history and anti-Mormon literature" and instead focus on reading the BOM, fasting, praying, and (of course) paying your tithing. He may tell you that those issues you have are just Satan trying to deceive you. He may tell you that happiness can only be found within the church, and that life without the church is filled with sorrow and despair. He may try to deflect from church doctrine and history and instead focus on all the "Good that comes from the church". He may talk about the church's emphasis on "Families". He may hold your family spiritually hostage and point out that if you leave, you won't have your wife in the next life.

And, he may just not respond at all.

Only you can decide whether that response is satisfactory to you. It wasn't satisfactory to me, nor to many/most/all of the people on this forum.

What I can tell you is that life is so much better when you aren't shackled down to a false belief. When you come through the tunnel and see the light for the first time, you are amazed that you ever bought into it in the first place. Suddenly, you become your own man, seeing the world anew. It was a shock to me that "the world" isn't a depraved place filled with sorrow. It is just people who are trying to do the best they can with what they have. People who are happy and people who are sad (just like in the church).

I found out that having an occasional beer or glass of wine can be a truly enjoyable experience. And sharing a glass of alcohol can be a quick way to break down barriers and make new friends.

I found out that I can spend time with people I actually enjoy being around rather than basing my friendships on belief.

I found out that I have so much more time to spend with my family when I don't have 6 hours of meetings each weekend.

I found out that I don't have all the answers. I found out that there are some questions where the only appropriate response is "I don't know". I found out that science's greatest strength isn't that it "Knows everything" (it doesn't) but that it is constantly revising and changing its position to stay consistent with facts.

Last thing, you expressed a fear of "resigning" from the church. You don't have to. I haven't, and I don't have any plans to do so in the future. My name is still on the rolls. My wife still attends and I attend with her out of support. The bishop of her ward knows I am an atheist apostate and doesn't ask me to do stuff. When they do ask me to do a calling, I tell them "no".

I interact with the church as much (or as little) as I want to, and so can you.

I wish you the best.

emkaycee · 20 points · Posted at 13:59:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ah, yes, the counsel to stop looking. “You’re getting hung up on little things. Things that happened in the past are behind us. Why are you so fixated on this stuff? Remember feelings.”

The hypocrisy of this line of logic is jaw-dropping. The history matters because the church says it does. It uses a demonstrably false historical narrative to make its claim of extraordinary specialness and divine authority. And with that claim, it declares itself fit to govern my life, overtake my conscience, declare my worthiness, tell me who to love and hate, what to wear, eat, drink, say, do, whom to marry. Quit slinging that claim around to tell me what to do and I’ll join with you in saying the problems don’t matter.

[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 14:18:17 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

My mom and TBM spouse asked me why I needed to Continue investigating- why couldn’t I just stop? I found this so insulting of my intelligence and of the reader and researcher they know me as. Since I was little, whenever I get interested in something, I read every single book I can get my hands on about the subject and don’t stop researching until I am fulfilled. Why would that be any different when investigating something my whole life has revolved around?

nowiexist42 · 8 points · Posted at 15:07:29 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

That comment says more about them than you. Some people value truth, others good vibes, the latter should not be trusted as much the former as a source of truth.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 14:53:53 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really appreciate the kind words and for sharing your experiences.

AttendPretend · 3 points · Posted at 17:15:11 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks for taking the time to put together your thoughts on this thread. Sometimes I think your approach is the best: just treat TSCC like any other church: attend when you want, stay as long as you want, pick and choose what you believe and do.

THIS is what TSCC does not want because they need everyone to toe the line and be the same (pay tithing, follow the prophet without question, say "yes" to all church callings, raise future tithe payers etc etc).

AssPennies · 1 points · Posted at 05:05:35 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

like any other church

I think it might be accurate to say that most of us don't know what one of those is like.

greenpanda419 · 2 points · Posted at 20:12:27 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah, OP, I can guarantee you won't get satisfactory answers to any of those questions, because (as I'm sure you know) there simply aren't any, other than "the Church is a fraud."

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 17:22:04 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

"By small and simple things are great things brought to pass" literally means that the details are where the action is.

theplanet1972 · 31 points · Posted at 08:07:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Fantastic letter, nice job. Please let us know if you get a response.

[deleted] · 15 points · Posted at 08:22:58 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok. I will.

HighlySkepticalApe · 7 points · Posted at 11:51:19 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. Very interested in the response, but I think we all know the response. But it is still very important to hold the church and the leaders feet to the fire on this.

[deleted] · 25 points · Posted at 14:03:44 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

[deleted]

[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 15:14:03 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Asking the real questions.

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 14:38:14 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha 😆

415800002SM · 13 points · Posted at 08:55:13 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hi! I like the question about the 116 pages. It's very incriminating.

vikings-vs-pioneers · 9 points · Posted at 10:31:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree!!! It's perfect!!! "If the seer stone was a real urim and thumin and Joseph was a seer and revelator...then when the original 116 pages of the Book of Mormon translation were lost/stolen, why didn't Joseph Smith use the seer stone in his hat to find out where this valuable treasure (word of God) was located?"

dntwrryhlpisontheway · 7 points · Posted at 14:13:00 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Because faith, agency blah blah blah

It's more important to protect Lucy Haris's agency that Helen Mar Kimball.

Word2daWise · 2 points · Posted at 23:18:28 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

God didn't want them discovered just yet. He works in mysterious ways. Or some such crap.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 14:49:49 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

They want us to believe in magic and suspend our disbelief to the nth degree so this seems like a reasonable question.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 18:27:01 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Clearly the pages would have just been hidden by an angel as HF had to punish Joseph and Harris for their disobedience in allowing him to take the pages home to that horrid faithless woman. /s

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 21:13:23 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I could totally see me saying that back when I believed. Now that I am doubting it sounds all so ridiculous.

David_THE_Bednar · 13 points · Posted at 08:14:13 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very well said and thought out. You won't be getting those answers. The good news is, it's not so bad here on the outside.

[deleted] · 9 points · Posted at 08:21:07 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you. Looking forward to it.

[deleted] · 12 points · Posted at 07:58:22 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Good stuff. I enjoyed the read.

[deleted] · 7 points · Posted at 08:20:42 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you. Nervous.

daveescaped · 10 points · Posted at 11:04:36 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

I like all of these points except for number 1.

The idea that a computer algorithm can give a definitive answer about authorship is, to me, debateable. Anyone able to read can see similarities. I will grant you that. But the same process of comparing phraseology and word usage and style and the like using a computer has also been used by BYU to claim that each author in the BoM is a unique and separate individual.

My point is that just because someone determines parameters for such a program and analyses it with a Computer does not make it some simple slam dunk of science. Any such computer program should first be used against known literary works as a test of calibration. For example, can that same algorithm differentiate between Canterbury Tales and the Ormulum (another work written in Middle English)? Can it disntinguish a book by Hemingway from a fake Hemingway manuscript? Can it see as identical an early work by Shakespeare with a later one? I have never seen proof that such programs are capable of this. Which makes such an exercise little more than, "these books sound similar aaaaaaand yep, my computer that I programmed agrees".

Anyone who reads both sources (the BoM and the Late War for example) will see strong similarities. But wht does that mean? Certainly there are large portions of the BoM that do not appear in the other works you listed.

To be brief, I think there are far more compelling evidences against the BoM than word print analysis. The massive amount of contradictory archaeology is a big one. People seem to shy away from this but I don't understand why. For the BoM to be true, it would be like finding that under the ruins of Rome we find massive amount of ruins of the Han Empire (ancient Chinese empire) that must have coexisted with the Romans.

Now, would such a discovery be impossible? I suppose in some sense not. The physical laws of the universe don't make it impossible. But it is so mind blowingly unlikely as to easily be seen as impossible by anyone who gives it a moments thought.

This is how likely it is that ancient Hebrews co-occupied Mayan lands at the same time as they Mayans without leaving a trace. It is just as likely as ancient Han co-occupying Rome at the height of Roman power. It is so nonsensical, it should be immediately dismissed by everyone.

That to me is more compelling. But otherwise I found the list a strong rhetorical gauntlet.

tenpeanuts · 5 points · Posted at 18:19:43 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

What still makes the Late War et al significant to me is that it contradicts the story that Joseph was an uninformed 14 year-old who wrote a book unlike anything else the world had ever seen. When the reality is that similar books existed (very similar, down to the "and it came to pass"es), those books were popular in the area he was raised, and the ideas of the Book of Mormon were much more commonplace among people of the time.

None of which they teach you on Sundays. Wonder why...

IllusionsDestroyed · 3 points · Posted at 23:54:03 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I have to respectfully disagree. I've seen new computer plagiarism algorithms quickly catch plagiarism, and can give a definitive answer that the author has, in fact, used other publications to produce his own. I would question anything BYU would publish regarding the BoM, as they have a huge stake in publishing what the brethren want.

  • What book claimed that the Hebrews “occupied the whole extent of the American continents”?

  • What book refers to a migration of peoples to America, which were religiously motivated, and entered a valley at the commencement of their journey?·

  • What book had a book/scriptures which they had for a long time preserved, but that having lost the knowledge of reading it…they buried it?

  • What book describes a breastplate “in resemblance of the Urim and Thummin” made of a white conch shell with two holes to which are fastened white buckhorn buttons “as if in imitation of the precious stones of the Urim"?

  • What book tells of Hebrews who arrived on the American continents divided into two classes, most of them fell into a wandering idle hunting life”, but that “more sensible parts of this people associated together to improve their knowledge of the arts" and the more civilized portion of this society separated from the more primitive group, who “lost the knowledge of their having descended from the same family.”· As a result of “tremendous wars,” the civilized group “became extinct"?

  • What book part of the ancient inhabitants of America changed from monarchical governments to republican governments, and the civil and ecclesiastical power was united in the same person?

  • What book used extensive quotations from Isaiah regarding the scattering and future gathering of Israel?

The answer to the questions above is: View of the Hebrews, written by Ethan Smith in 1825.

That being said, even BH Roberts knew there was extensive plagiarism in creating the BoM. He asked, "Did Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews furnish structural material for Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon? It has been pointed out in these pages that there are many things in the former book that might well have suggested many major things in the other. Not a few things merely, one or two, or half dozen, but many; and it is this fact of many things of similarity and the cumulative force of them that makes them so serious a menace to Joseph Smith's story of the Book of Mormon's origin."

I won't even go into the Late War comparisons with the Book of Mormon, but here is a great link: https://wordtreefoundation.github.io/thelatewar/

daveescaped · 1 points · Posted at 04:02:50 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don't disagree that Smith used those texts. But this is something that can be easily demonstrated by a simple side-by-side comparison. And the example of such programs finding plagiarism in college term papers is not equivalent in my opinion.

I take issue with relying too heavily on a process that also produced results that the faithful can point to. Especially when (as I said) a simple comparison is sufficient.

SUPinitup · 2 points · Posted at 17:13:04 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

He didn't use the gold plates. That's the most compelling in my opinion.

Bobihor · 2 points · Posted at 18:04:19 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I agree, there is no direct plagiarism here. The value of The Late War, View of the Hebrews, etc., are that they make the BoM less special. The ideas found within and the scriptural style language are NOT unique to the BoM, but were in fact quite commonplace in that time and place.

Word2daWise · 1 points · Posted at 23:22:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I see those books as being his writing prompts (or storytelling prompts) for the crap he dictated and called the BoM. If you've ever been around a really gifted liar, they can weave stories like crazy. They thrive on it, and thrive on having an audience. He did "borrow" enough that in today's world he'd have faced a lawsuit for plagiarizing (plagiarism can be plot related as well as content that is verbatim). He read the books and used them as the basis for his own fiction.

vikings-vs-pioneers · 9 points · Posted at 10:32:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

And this!!!! "Since we still have Joseph's seer stone, why dont the Brothern put it in a hat and ask it where the Book or Mormon actually took place?"

koningsgraven · 10 points · Posted at 13:08:06 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I imagine Brigham Young coveting the seer stone and when JS dies he is so excited that he finally has it, puts it in a hat puts his face in the hat and nothing happening, he shakes the rocks around in the hat, tries again, nothing. He keeps praying, trying, praying, trying, and nothing happens. Then he decides he must not be as worthy as JS. So every few years after that he keeps trying again, and nothing happens. The first crack in his arrogant shelf.

ortolon · 6 points · Posted at 18:47:31 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I imagine Briggy knew what was up just as well.as Emma. He didn't believe in the rock any more than Joe did.

spazzitzia · 3 points · Posted at 19:50:40 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Can you imagine BY looking in his hat thinking, "I'm gonna go find el Dorado."

koningsgraven · 2 points · Posted at 21:47:09 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I’m sure you are right, but I like the thought of BY and other profits struggling with not getting the seer stone working and feeling like they are some how not worthy, since that was how many of us felt with not feeling the spirit and not getting answers to our prayers.

bun84067 · 2 points · Posted at 21:38:36 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

One wonders whether any current/prior general authorities have tried the rock-in-the-hat-method. I would bet that even they weren't gullible enough to think it would work. ;)

Archmonk · 8 points · Posted at 13:00:42 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Stake President (ignoring everything you said): Well, of course, challenging the Lord's true church only comes about because of pride and sin.

That is the response I got. I hope you get a better one! At the very least, the SP will have one more item to try and support on his shelf.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 22:05:57 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

"...because of pride and sin."

"Whose? Mine or yours?"

(Very good letter! I wish you the best.)

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 18:29:24 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well when you chalk it up to pride and sin it really puts OP’s letter in perspective and makes you realize how true the church really is. /s

crocodileinspelling · 7 points · Posted at 09:51:26 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Really great letter! Nicely done how you boiled it down to 10 points that are meaningful, yet substantiated with facts, not just emotion-fueled (such as, why are the q15 such homophobic pricks? That would not have been helpful.) looking forward to hearing any follow up.

[deleted] · 5 points · Posted at 14:51:29 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

If he responds I will let the group know.

GENERALLY_CORRECT · 3 points · Posted at 18:29:31 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

The only thing I would have changed is leading your questions with the BoM analysis with other texts. I know it might be a big deal to some people but for a lot of people it's kind of a reach.

I definitely think it's worth noting, but believers can easily dismiss it as something "anti" because of its origins.

The closest thing to a "smoking gun" in my opinion is the Book of Abraham and the Kinderhook plates. More people need to be aware of those details and is always something I go to first when discussing church history. 2/3 of the stuff JS translated is verifiably false. That's a huge deal.

Zadok_The_Priest · 6 points · Posted at 13:53:42 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

And you hit on my number one problem. Not a single issue, but ALL of them, combined together.

swordandthestone · 6 points · Posted at 09:10:12 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

thank you for sharing this.

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 14:50:49 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You are welcome. I do not expect him to respond. If he does I will update the group.

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 17:33:16 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 6 points · Posted at 18:00:05 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Funny you should mention that. I was laying up in bed one night struggling with trying to make sense of all of the different things that didn’t make sense and the thought came to me that there was only one answer that made everything absolutely everything fit and that is the answer my brain was hiding from my consciousness and then finally it just spilled out. I laughed for about five minutes and then the crying began...

Word2daWise · 3 points · Posted at 23:26:21 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes - when you realize it's all fake, you go through a myriad of feelings. My crying was even more severe when I realized the church had LIED to me (and many others) to get me to join. The corporate narrative is false, and it is deliberately false.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 23:41:04 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sorry you went through that.

Word2daWise · 3 points · Posted at 00:55:10 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you - far too many people do not understand the terrible devastation a true convert feels at the betrayal. Dedicated converts are among the strongest members; we embraced the church and jumped in full-force. We trusted. We truly converted, rather than being fed expectations to be baptized or serve.

We also had mostly the narrative to go on, unlike some BIC members who learned some of the ugly things as they grew up. I was completely blindsided, and had fallen for the "those are all anti-Mormon lies" story.

Learning the church had lied, and then learning that the lies were unending, was among the worst things I've ever experienced. Maybe even the worst (I can't think of one that affected me as traumatically).

When life deals you a bad hand, it is just life, even if it hurts like hell. When you give all your trust to a church, you expect it to be truthful (it's a church, after all). Never in my life would I have thought any church could be this dishonest, and I certainly didn't think the church claiming to be "the one true" would be entirely fake. I had a meltdown that terrified me.

Anyway, thanks, more than you know, for recognizing the pain. I'm fine now, but I was far from fine a few years ago.

Chino_Blanco · 5 points · Posted at 08:12:02 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

A paragon in every aspect. Wow. Nice to read that your wife is as reasonable as you appear to be.

[deleted] · 8 points · Posted at 08:22:13 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

She is TBM. Very deeply brainwashed. Loves me. Knows I am miserable.

vikings-vs-pioneers · 5 points · Posted at 10:37:58 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just love your letter!!!

It's great that your wife loves you!! Will she stay with you even if you become inactive? How old are your children?

lanfanmu · 5 points · Posted at 10:26:43 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

We do have our fair share of assorted lists and letters of all shapes, stripes, and sizes--many of us seem to feel compelled to write one after all, whether or not we actually do--but I particularly like yours for its just-right combination of length and heft. Thank you.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 14:52:42 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thanks. Of course, right behind these 10 are another 💯.

Word2daWise · 2 points · Posted at 23:24:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yep. The rabbit hole is nothing, if not deep, winding, and full of surprises or new information about lies.

ATmega32 · 5 points · Posted at 11:55:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

a chocolate colored egg rock that he put in a hat and that it glowed the words until the scribe wrote them down exactly as they appeared and would not disappear until they were written down perfectly

why did the original manuscript of the Book of Mormon ... need to be edited, corrected, updated, and altered in 3,000+ places?

Either believe in super powers (and the super powers are somehow real) or don't. They cannot have it both ways.

At some point it must become incumbent upon tscc to provide answers as opposed to leaving members to speculate and figure out this stuff on their own.

Great letter OP! Keep us posted.

X_Lazarus · 4 points · Posted at 15:14:27 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is incredible! Saving for future reference. Please update us in a future post with his reply. The spirit™ is telling me that you will be resigning your membership in the near future due to your stake president’s inability or unwillingness to answer these questions. Best of luck to you.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:23:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you. I really appreciate that. He is a good and honest man and I can only imagine I am not the only faithful steak member who is coming to him with these kinds of questions. Since we all know there are not really any faith promoting answers that makes sense he is in a tough position to try and keep the flock together.

X_Lazarus · 3 points · Posted at 16:01:21 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

While I feel bad for the “middle management” like him who are put in this position, I think more people giving the ultimatum that you are giving to your stake president would force them all to go to those above them in the hierarchy to seek answers. When those answers are never given then they will realize for sure that there are no “faithful” answers to these questions.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:49:36 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes and he is related to a current apostle. Poor guy.

Word2daWise · 2 points · Posted at 23:27:14 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Oh, wow. That is painful.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:06:41 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me too!

BillReel · 5 points · Posted at 20:32:15 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love putting this back on the ecclesiastical ladder letting these move as far up as they can get. Minds need blown and people need to see that the messiness goes forever.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 21:11:29 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hello Bill. Thank you for the kind response and insightful comment. One of your podcast about the essays and how they are changing the narrative is something I sent to my stake president and Bishop about 12 months ago. They did not read it because they thought it was anti-Mormon and so I do not really know how much of the issues they are aware of on the essays. I will return and report. Yes. This has consequences that will go far beyond church on Sunday.

TheHalfbrit · 4 points · Posted at 10:36:38 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

If your SP has not been entirely robbed of his ability to reason you might find yourselves discussing the batshit craziness of it all over a few beers somewhere down the line.

However, if he is already aware of the issues and prefers to continue in blissful ignorance, your well written letter will unlikely have any impact and you are merely farting against the wind.

DavidAssBednar · 5 points · Posted at 10:44:23 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I understand your sincere desire for answers. I also wrestled for years trying to find answers that would lead me back to full belief in the church.

Eventually I concluded every one of those questions can be answered with ‘Joseph smith made it up.’

Once I found that answer, suddenly everything clicked into place. The pieces all came together and it all made sense.

Word2daWise · 5 points · Posted at 15:06:48 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is wonderfully articulate and detailed. It's also concise, and while it asks for reasons, it does not attack.

Please let us know what happens. I asked for explainations about three years ago and got the dodge ball, other than an email from Bishop Jerkface offering to meet with me to discuss a long list of things I was surely failing to do (reading scriptures, living the WOW, whatever). He assured me it would be a "kind" meeting. I did not feel it deserved the courtesy of a response.

I don't see a way out of the rabbit hole for you. Not because you're not open to it, and not because your SP might come down on you. There's no way to unsee things once you see them. There's no way to reconcile that a church that has lied for many generations is anything close to being a "true" church.

I admire you for sending the email. I hope your SP reads the things you cited.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:14:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I will return and report. You are correct that once you see the magic behind the trick you can’t see the magic again.

w-t-fluff · 3 points · Posted at 21:10:13 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I for one am eagerly looking forward to your Return and Report™ (Former) Bisop /u/flaminsord.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 16:08:35 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Perhaps less doctrinal and more corporate strategy related, the church's adversarial approach to LGBTQ is disturbing. Suicide in UT is the leading killer of youth. Perhaps leadership can rationalize that its heavy-handed approach has no impact. Still, you'd at least hope that leadership would tread lightly until more research can be done and its impact analyzed. These men are unworthy of the power with which they've been entrusted.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 17:50:42 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well said. That is exactly right.

BillReel · 5 points · Posted at 20:32:30 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love putting this back on the ecclesiastical ladder letting these move as far up as they can get. Minds need blown and people need to see that the messiness goes forever.

JackEQP · 3 points · Posted at 22:06:09 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Amazing letter!!!!! I am currently sitting as an Elders Quorum president. Going through the motions and it's killing me. I manage though. Very Brave of you! Let us know what happens!

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 23:38:24 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hardest thing I have ever had to go through. Will return and report.

rhunston · 3 points · Posted at 10:09:17 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Excellent letter. Please let us know what the stake president’s response is.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 14:51:48 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok. Will do.

vikings-vs-pioneers · 3 points · Posted at 10:30:35 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I just loved this: "If the seer stone was a real urim and thumin and Joseph was a seer and revelator...then when the original 116 pages of the Book of Mormon translation were lost/stolen, why didn't Joseph Smith use the seer stone in his hat to find out where this valuable treasure (word of God) was located?"

MorticiaSmith · 3 points · Posted at 10:36:54 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very good letter.

I unfortunately think your response is to be threatened with a court of love if you don't shut up.

I hope that doesn't happen.

Rmbmr · 3 points · Posted at 12:01:19 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very impressed with your words my friend. They are like a stone cut out of mountain.

Oldklunker · 3 points · Posted at 12:30:47 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

These are really not questions. They are statements of fact that suggest Mormonism is what the Bible warned against; following false prophets.

I_H8_The_LDS_Church · 3 points · Posted at 14:23:16 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Exceptional

late_warmonger · 3 points · Posted at 14:27:31 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

The Late War

Giggity!

notrab · 3 points · Posted at 16:59:56 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

By what measure are you calling MMM the "worst" terrorist attack in our history. Shouldn't that go to the other 9/11 the one in NY? More people died.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:53:45 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. Good point. That is what I meant. Worst one Up until then.

brighamthediggler · 3 points · Posted at 17:31:22 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You haven't cut the umbilical cord yet, but chopping at it with a machete won't help. After being out for more than 2 decades and seeing the journey of so many, there is certainly a pattern. Just about every dyed in the wool believing acolyte spends the second part of their transition trying to disprove what they learned in part one. It is tough. I basically disproved the church over about a 2 week period and then spent the next 2 years trying to disprove what I learned in 2 weeks.

It is tough. Tough to know that you have been lied to from birth, lived in a society based on an elaborate fabrication and been both emotionally and sexually repressed, all the while praising the prophet and the current "god led" leaders. I am certain it is even harder for you, a man who has spent so much of your time and energy working for the church, and all that you sacrificed in time away from your loved ones, money and every other sacrifice you made.

Best advice? You will be angry, if you aren't already. don't let it consume you. there is so much good in the world and so much outside the walls of the cult that can inspire and lift you up. And as you already know, you are not alone. Be assured that we see you as courageous and a man of strong character to do what you have done. Take pride in that.

And be with your family, don't keep them out of your struggle. I was lucky to get out with my family. So many have lost so much in the effort. Our thoughts are certainly with you. Best of luck and may your future be bright and fulfilling.

JackEQP · 3 points · Posted at 22:10:47 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is great advice. I am still in the church and serving. Really trying to take it slow. Still really hard. we will see.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 17:57:59 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you. I really appreciate your heartfelt and sincere comments. Yes this is going to be quite a journey. I will return and report.

brighamthediggler · 2 points · Posted at 19:36:44 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do so. It won't be easy, but have confidence in yourself and your own decisions.

iamanemptychair · 3 points · Posted at 17:54:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Leaving the church will not be the biggest mistake of your life. It may be the hardest thing you’ll ever do, but it is never wrong to learn and follow the truth. Good luck dude. We’re here for ya when/if the SP gives you unsatisfying nonanswers and/or gets offended by you even asking and insists the devil is influencing you to say all this.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 18:00:48 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you.

yauguts · 3 points · Posted at 20:40:02 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nicely stated. It’ll be interesting to hear his response.

Just curious, how was MMM a worse terror attack than 9/11? The number of deaths is drastically different. Or are you saying it’s the worst American on American attack?

stokerfam · 3 points · Posted at 20:55:38 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm not as eloquent a writer as you, but I met with my Bishop yesterday to tell him of my intentions of leaving the church. One thing he said stuck out to me because I am having a "crisis of faith". He said, and I quote, "there is no logical or scientific explanation to know..." and he went on to talk about Joseph Smith and the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon.

I just can't. Seriously.

buzzsawddog · 3 points · Posted at 21:14:25 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)
[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 21:16:07 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Golden. Thank you.

namtokmuu · 1 points · Posted at 16:41:56 on December 12, 2017 · (Permalink)

The above link/chain regarding JoD is mind blowing!! I was not aware that the Church now officially states that JoD is/was not an official Church publication. If they can do this, in 20 years they will be telling people that the Book of Mormon is not official church scripture!

buzzsawddog · 2 points · Posted at 02:25:10 on December 13, 2017 · (Permalink)

I know right... it was authorized by the prophet and the 12.. it was praised by them but now is just a source of "unofficial" material that might not be truthful or accurate...

TheNewNameIsGideon · 3 points · Posted at 22:28:17 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Am writing you tonight lowly of heart and spirit. Am reaching out to you asking for your help in keeping me from making the biggest mistake of my life...resigning my membership from the church!

Sounds to me like you on the road of no return. I sent my letter in with several examples like you. My one concern, in light of these listed concerns, it doesn't bother them!! Nephi murdering a man to steal from him does not bother them! I couldn't reconcile with them and they with me. It was a no-win situation.

I would share with my Wife some of the things that Bothered me. She finally told me to stop coming to Church.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 23:39:48 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

My wife told me that last week.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 15:27:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

Very concise and well-worded letter. But I'm not a fan of putting the responsibility of your actions on someone else's shoulders. If you have questions, then it's your responsibility to find answers. And if you can't find adequate answers, then that needs to be enough justification to determine your actions.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 15:52:50 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I know what you mean. It is very complicated and since I live in a close knit Ward and the closeness steak I did not think that slowly going in active what’s the best approach. I want people to know how hard I tried and that this was not an easy decision and that I understand the consequences and that it was not due to lack of effort prayers study and contemplation that I made this decision.

spawnofparley · 2 points · Posted at 16:17:28 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You will have to trust me when I say I fully understand your pain and need for answers but why put yourself and your friend through all this. You came, you saw, you questioned and you found the answers. Walk away proud in the courage it took to do so. Into the great wide open my friend, into the great wide open.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:51:30 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I hear you. Soon and very soon.

spawnofparley · 2 points · Posted at 16:03:15 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

YES! The only justification required for positive action is the content of one's own rational mind.

JohnGalt671844 · 2 points · Posted at 14:08:52 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Great list of questions, same thoughts and qustions as my list, I hope there are answers, but I'm afraid we will never get answers. I heard new Church policy is avoid difficult questions. Oaks Ballard

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 14:16:03 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Really great. Actually considering approaching my TBM husband with these questions and working my way up to CES letter.

DarknDelightsome · 2 points · Posted at 14:24:58 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Standing ovation! This was fun to read.

jocat1957 · 2 points · Posted at 14:57:17 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I never understood the racism - God/Jesus would never have treated any of his children any differently than another. Obviously it was man-made, don't care if that was society at that time - it was not the way of the Lord.

Oh_the_regrets_ · 2 points · Posted at 15:47:24 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I really appreciate the way you wrote this- it very well says what I would like to say. I’m saving it for future reference.

truth101please · 2 points · Posted at 15:51:53 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Very good. Isn't it amazing how much time is wasted unraveling the mind control that has us entrapped from a very young age. About the same timelines for me as well. I hope we can all be free from it soon. Remember your sp is just a guy down the street and you are much more "aware" than he is. Here's to truth!

tominmoraga · 2 points · Posted at 16:07:33 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

so foreign to what I was taught as a child and taught as a missionary

I think so too. Especially the principle of repentance. When you are perfect, no repentance is necessary, I guess.

tomtemple · 2 points · Posted at 16:22:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)*

Bishop

You have captured many of the issues. Mine is the Elijah appearance. How can one apostate named Warren Cowdery write a third person account of an angel restoring Sealing powers with out Joseph or Oliver EVER admitting to the event and it becoming the central point of all ordinances in the entire church? Ask your Stake President to find ANYTHING taught by JS regarding the event. You will find more teaching of men living on the moon than of the Elijah visit.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 17:52:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

That is very interesting. We all have very little in the Scriptures about how the endowment was revealed and how the garments were revealed and how the Washington annoying things were revealed. There’s just no information. It’s because it was all copied from the freemasons.

reddolfo · 2 points · Posted at 16:32:03 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Excellent. Sadly, it is foregone he will have nothing I am afraid.

Bad--Bear · 2 points · Posted at 16:56:12 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I had no idea that there has been computational text analysis done on the BOM and those other books, that's really cool. I have to go look that up

Apost8Joe · 2 points · Posted at 17:16:09 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

As said below...the Church has absolutely NOTHING to offer us, it's all an ELABORATE DECEPTION. Carry on Brother, you're not wrong.

rockmtns12 · 2 points · Posted at 19:26:09 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

NeverMo here with a question....what's the Mark Hoffman affair?

viking_sweden · 3 points · Posted at 20:15:33 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

You’re in for a treat

Saul_Panzer_NY · 2 points · Posted at 19:59:19 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

It's DaVinci Code stuff. Hoffman forged a bunch of documents and journals supposedly from early church founders and sold them to the church in the 80's. He even forged some things that would embarrass the church so they would buy them to conceal them, like the Salamander Letter. He went on a bombing spree and killed some people when things started getting out of his control. He was caught when one blew up in his car when he was going to deliver it. He's in prison now. Supposedly he has a bunch of dirt on the church about forgeries he's sold them and they support his family to keep him quiet.

It's a very interesting rabbit hole.

truth101please · 1 points · Posted at 03:23:29 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

"Supposedly he has a bunch of dirt on the church about forgeries he's sold them and they support his family to keep him quiet."

Source please

Saul_Panzer_NY · 1 points · Posted at 03:33:36 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

“Speculative Gossip” by Busybody, L.D.S., 1989

brighamthediggler · 1 points · Posted at 19:46:28 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Mark Hoffman was a forger and scam artist that sold many thousands of dollars worth of forged documents to the church. Because the forgeries proclaimed info that was derogatory to the church, they bought them to bury them. In 1987, Hoffman murdered 2 people to cover his crime. He is now doing life in Utah State Prison.

http://mormoncurtain.com/topic_markhofman.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Hofmann

The big point is that the "god led, spirit prompted" leaders of the church did not only not catch on to his scam, but were actually warned of the forgeries by outside sources- primarily the Tanners in SLC who are critics of the church. It is a big black eye to the church.

Word2daWise · 1 points · Posted at 23:34:35 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think the bigger point may prove to be that some of Hofmann's forgeries had (fake) information about Smith that the church wanted to stow away so nobody would ever see it. Church leaders always knew JS was crazy, and a percentage of the crazy fed into the approved narrative, but any sort of crazy that could create problems was always denied, covered up, or destroyed.

It would be so interesting to see what they now claim are additional forgeries (like about 400 of them). I speculate that maybe they will try to pass off real information that would be damaging as products of Hofmann's creativity. And, I would bet there are forged documents they bought just to hush them up.

brighamthediggler · 2 points · Posted at 01:15:37 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

At the time, I read one of them that was published- the Salamander Letter. I got to admit it would certainly, if true, cast JS in a bad light. After reading "Early Mormonism And the Magical World View" it was very similar to a couple of the parchments presented in there, in terms of content and writing. Hofmann did a good enough job to fool some supposed experts, so he probably thought he could pull it off.

Word2daWise · 1 points · Posted at 01:19:18 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I read somewhere (years ago) that he found sheets or pieces of vintage paper to use for his forgeries, and I guess he had figured out how to create ink that would pass for being authentic from that era. Beyond that, he was an artist. He was talented, that's for sure. But so was Joseph Smith.

brighamthediggler · 1 points · Posted at 01:31:14 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

At the time I was looking into the church prior to leaving, and this was one of the triggers. I know the ink he used was very carefully made and closely resembled that of ink of the period of the papers. So he definitely did his homework. but not quite good enough to fool some people familiar with old documents, including the Tanners, Sandra and Gerald. They actually warned the church and the church didn't listen. That is a step above spiritual prompting and they still didn't get it. Big crack in the shelf for me.

Another one was the fact that a coworker of mine said that he had a brother that worked at BYU in the History department and had access to original manuscripts including the B of M and he was convinced that the church was a fraud, just from the changes made in the early writing and also that there were apparently other so-called early documents the church bought and basically hid away, similar to the Hofmann papers. So there was a pattern of hiding documents that might be harmful to the church already in play.

Word2daWise · 1 points · Posted at 02:17:30 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

It always fascinates me when people who work in the belly of the beast figure out it is fake, but are not in a position to leave. I end up wondering if the finally leave the church when they can retire or find a new job.

Flaming_Sword · 2 points · Posted at 20:08:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Nice username.

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 21:04:37 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

How funny

BillReel · 2 points · Posted at 20:32:45 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I love putting this back on the ecclesiastical ladder letting these move as far up as they can get. Minds need blown and people need to see that the messiness goes forever.

brainwashednomore · 2 points · Posted at 21:45:25 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Well written. How long ago were you released as Bishop?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 23:37:31 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

9 years.

ExmoSon · 2 points · Posted at 00:53:45 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Do you have a source for the linguistic calculation computer on question #1? I'd LOVE THIS!

grabmyseerstones · 1 points · Posted at 02:02:32 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Me to

MysteryMove · 2 points · Posted at 01:39:51 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I'm right here with you, in similar shoes at the moment. I've been in (and currently am in) church leadership most of my adult life. If it wasn't for my wife and kids I would have dropped the church right away. But I'm taking my time with their best interest at heart. When my shelf broke, it was just destroyed. I've had a completely open mind to mending it but the only thing that makes sense is it's all a fraud. All those uninspired callings I had to give, priesthood blessings that didn't come to pass, inspiration that obviously wasn't, justifying my strong testimony of the BOM despite trying moroni's promise every time i read, justifying the church on racism, lgbt, polygamy, etc. All my cognitive dissonance departed in a single, heartbreaking moment that i can only compare to losing a family member. Then, came a mental peace and clarity that I've never felt. Great letter. I wish you the best in your journey. You're not alone.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 02:40:22 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you for your kind words.

throwitoutorelse · 2 points · Posted at 03:07:11 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I can’t help but think that polygamy came to a halt because of the law (Utah, you want to be a state, don’t you?)....and I can only guess blacks having the Priesthood came about because of the law... lawsuits maybe??

astralboy15 · 1 points · Posted at 13:03:26 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

What is your source for point number 1?

suresignofthenail · 2 points · Posted at 14:48:02 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Look up Chris Johnson Big Data.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 15:43:59 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

His response will be interesting. The CES letter really got people to think. Funny as Gerald and Sandra Tanner have been teaching this stuff for 40 years. Mormonthink.com has a ton of good info, also predating CES. The discourses of Brigham Young took my belief in one weekend as it shows completely that BY was not a prophet.

[deleted] · 3 points · Posted at 15:55:13 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I do expect an answer and he is a really good guy and I think he is going to answer me. Unfortunately we both know that there are only apologetic answers that don’t really hold water.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 20:10:10 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

When you get it, if allowed, share:)

JurassicPark6 · 1 points · Posted at 17:25:32 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is an EXCELLENT summary, and your distress is well reflected here. There are NO satisfactory answers within the traditional "one true church" narrative of the LDS church. The very best you can get to is that maybe Joseph was removed as a prophet because he was starting to become corrupted by power (the "fallen prophet" concession). But that doesn't work for me and it doesn't explain why Section 132, the racist principles, the temple covenants, and the Book of Abraham are all still very much doctrine.

Remember it's the church who said it's either ALL true or a it's a fraud. I didn't create the binary proposition, but I was heartbroken to find out that it was most definitely not all true. Best of luck to you, Bishop!

Mormonismisntanism · 1 points · Posted at 18:06:19 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Hate to be the negative Nellie but:

Really great content with too many adjectives and adverbs, many of them inflammatory. Don’t get me wrong —

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 18:13:16 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yeah. I thought I had toned it down since I removed a lot of emotionally charged content. I just reread it and you are right that it would’ve been more effective if I had appeared more Christlike and bought in to the sensitive personality of all TBM’s.

Mormonismisntanism · 1 points · Posted at 18:45:33 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

It’s a fine line with Mormons, given how sensitive they are to challenges to their beliefs. Don’t want to pander. But also want them to listen if hey can. Thanks for listening to my feedback.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:24:23 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

I hope SP reads the entire email.

Courageous person you are. I've missed your other posts, hope family doing ok..

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 19:58:59 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 20:17:46 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Thank you. I have not read the CES letter all the way through...but I think we all get to about the same place after looking at church friendly sources.

jta314 · 1 points · Posted at 20:23:22 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Doesn't it seem logical that a tbm will say, "it doesn't matter how the plates were translated? Whether by U&T or by the stone in the hat. It's still obviously the word of god if he's looking in the hat. He can't be copying any text. There must be divine inspiration. Especially when compared to Emma's accounts of how he spelled out words he didn't know while looking in the hat." I think if you believe in the notion of an almighty god that has power to do anything. Thats not that weird at all? Preparing to talk to someone about all this, so I'm trying to go in prepared.

[deleted] · 4 points · Posted at 21:09:39 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes that is the problem I also have with superhero action movies. Are usually say to myself well if superman can fly the world to make it rotate backwards then anything that happens he can just go back in time and ReversU and save Lois Lane. If Joseph Smith has a magical rock that tells him what to do and helps them find buried treasure then why can’t he use the same magical rock to find the last 116 pages. Why can’t the magical rock tell us where the book of Mormon took place? I mean if we are going to say we have a magical rock let’s use it.

SLC_Ghostwriter · 1 points · Posted at 23:27:51 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Response: "Dear Brother flaminsord, exactly how long have you been addicted to pornography?" /s

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 23:41:51 on November 6, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha. Am prepared for that.

leviticus20verse14 · 1 points · Posted at 00:02:23 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Your letter is thoughtful, intelligently written and powerful... I am saving your post to share with my wife someday (when she is ready). Thank you for sharing this. All the best to you and your family!

BMFahrtzz · 1 points · Posted at 00:05:28 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Wow, bishop, lay off the masturbation.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 00:22:07 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Haha.

throwitoutorelse · 1 points · Posted at 03:14:51 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sincere question... in your opinions... was JS just bat shit crazy to have NOT said “Just kidding! Just kidding!” when he was about to be tarred and feathered? Makes no sense to me for a guy who made it all up to say, “Go ahead, pour hot tar all over me” if he made it up. Your input would be appreciated ;)

[deleted] · 2 points · Posted at 03:51:00 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I don’t know. He was being tarred and feathered for sleeping with a teenage girl in the community (not for any thing he could say he made up).

throwitoutorelse · 1 points · Posted at 04:03:40 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Ok. Interesting.. thanks.

itsgoingtohurt · 1 points · Posted at 09:03:56 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

I think he had power by that point, and they didn't tar and feather him because he had made up a book and religion, they tarred and feathered him because he was making advances on 16 year old Nancy Mirinda Johnson (who he later married) and he was trying to get her grandpa to give him land (which her grandpa eventually did). Making up a religion probably wasn't the reason they tarred an feathered him.

“Go ahead, pour hot tar all over me”

It was also probably pine tar, which does not need to be so hot to be in liquid form, unlike black tar which most people mistake it for nowadays. Throughout history tar and feathering was usually pine tar, and it was often more for embarrassment than it was for infliction of pain.

no-bs97 · 1 points · Posted at 03:26:29 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

This is a well thought out letter. I'm saving it for later. We will be drafting up something for our families and this has some great points. Keep us posted on his response.

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 03:51:55 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Yes. I will.

heartbrokenandgone · 1 points · Posted at 03:48:09 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Huh. I hadn't ever thought about #5.

The_True_Zephos · 1 points · Posted at 04:24:00 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Awesome letter. Can I share this?

[deleted] · 1 points · Posted at 04:27:42 on November 7, 2017 · (Permalink)

Sure. Keep me posted what you do with it. Curious if it helps anyone.

HTaddict · 1 points · Posted at 02:20:50 on November 9, 2017 · (Permalink)

Could you point me to a link or a site for your first bullet point? Id like to see that. I browsed through all three of those books and could see all the similarities, but I would love to see some hard data. Thanks in advance. And very well written. 👍🏼