CMV: esports should not be considered sports.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 17:13:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)


I recently read that Russia has officially recognized esports as an official sport, and other countries around the world are doing the same. ESPN is discussing deals to stream League of Legends on their channel.

In Greek culture, sport was hugely emphasized for the physical benefits it gave. Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates all agreed that sport, or "gymnastics" was an essential part of a well educated individual, the point being that physical activity was beneficial to the overall mind and psyche. They had games of strategy in those days as well, yet never referred to them as "sport."

I think by calling esports actual sports, we are undermining the importance of physical activity. Why not just simply call it what it is: "gaming?" Video game players are likening themselves to elite athletes without the same amount of training it takes to become a true athlete. The mental training may be similar, but in actual sports, mental and physical training are emphasized. Esports do not demonstrate physical skill, only mental skill. Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

Saved comment

LoompaOompa ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 17:25:09 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I think you're making a mistake by using Ancient Greece's classification of sports as your reasoning. The term has evolved over time. Chess is recognized as a sport by the International Olympic Committee. Fishing is recognized as a sport. Many people consider poker to be a sport.

If those things are considered sports, then it's unfair to the eSports competitors that they cannot be granted the same recognition.

[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 17:35:00 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

For people like me who do not consider fishing, poker, or chess to be a sport, what is the argument then?

No matter how the IOC defines things, my definition aligns with the dictionary, which says that a sport is a "activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment".

I consider anything that requires physical exertion or hand eye coordination and involves competition to be a sport.

Sports: soccer, golf, football, baseball, wrestling, etc.

Not sports: esports, chess, poker, fucking nascar, etc. Those things are competitions. They require skill. I'm not denying that they're entertaining, competitive, or difficult. But they aren't sports, because they don't involve a heavily physical component.

fireflash38 ยท 14 points ยท Posted at 19:45:57 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

As long as you control the definition of something, and disregard anyone else's definition, you set up an impenetrable wall. There is absolutely no point to a CMV post if you are able to set boundaries like that.

Either way, you have a contradiction in your own post:

I consider anything that requires [...] hand eye coordination and involves competition to be a sport.

Yet a lot of Esports require an immense amount of hand eye coordination.

Later on you set the bar even higher, disregarding your earlier definition, requiring a heavy physical component.

Esports are more often than not heavily endurance based. Best of 3s or best of 5s have a heavy reflex and mental strain on players. It's incredibly difficult to stay that concentrated for hours at a time. Even the 24h Le Mans requires breaks for their drivers.

teerre ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:15:48 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Then you're one with the special definition of sport because you will find plenty that do not fit this "involve a heavily physical component" definition

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:22:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

From what you linked, under "mind sports", which is where esports are included:

"Requiring little or no physical exertion or agility mind sports are often not considered true sports. Some mind sports are recognised by sporting federations. The following list is intended to represent anything that is likely to be referred to as a mind sport, not to argue their validity as sports."

Seems like your link either agrees with me or is neutral in this conversation about esports being considered actual sports or not.

teerre ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:28:28 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Not sure what you mean. "Mind sport" is in opposition to physical sports, both are sports in this particular list

Mind you that under physical sports, the same one with basketball and football, there are plenty of sports that do not fit your definition

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:42:55 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Actually, Wikipedia clearly calls out that they're not defining them as sports and says that they're contested. They take a neutral stance and make that clear.

You're right - and I do not share the same definition of sports that Wikipedia does. I share the definition that comes up when you google sports definition. Wikipedia has a much, much broader range.

hbomb30 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:18:35 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Can you give a reason as to why NASCAR is not a sport? It seems to be incredibly exhausting and places a great physical strain on the driver over a long period of time

[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:49:39 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

That one is much more debatable for me and is a harder argument. My personal feeling is that while it is exhausting, it's just driving - the exhaustion seems to come from having to mentally concentrate on strategy for 3 hours while driving. Again my personal feelings, but I feel like if you're a. Sitting down, and b. Doing something (albeit at a much more difficult and involved level) that most Americans do every single day, it's not a sport.

Do some incredibly athletic people race nascar? Yes. Is it an extremely competitive activity? Yes. But getting John cena to enter a political debate would not make debate a sport to me.

Plus I just have a really hard time calling tony Stewart an athlete. (Just a joke, I realize there are fat people in baseball, golf, etc)

Edit: also I just said "fucking nascar" in part because I grew up in the south and have had the argument whether nascar is a sport way too many times.

z3r0shade ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:22:47 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Sports: soccer, golf, football, baseball, wrestling, etc.

Golf does not require a heavy physical component

[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:42:31 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Not in terms of exertion. In terms of athletic ability like hand eye coordination, balance, etc., yes, it does.

z3r0shade ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:36:58 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Esports has equivalent amounts if not more in terms of hand eye coordination, compared to golf.

[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:11:16 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

What is your basis for saying that? Golf requires coordination with your arms, legs, wrists, shoulders all while swinging an object that isn't a part of your body at a tiny ball, and being a centimeter off can be the difference between a great shot and a horrible one.

Esports requires the ability to move a forearm and wrist to fairly accurate points on a screen. While seated. Also the mouse is much shorter and easier to control than a golf club. How exactly does that require more hand eye coordination than golf?

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 08:27:32 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

In golf you aren't really using hand eye coordination all that much. You just have to use your knowledge to line up the shot and then perfect your swing. In esports however you have to be constantly reacting to on-screen visuals using your mouse and keyboard.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 11:13:51 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

In golf you aren't really using hand eye coordination all that much

Hand eye coordination is probably the biggest determinant of success in golf. If you don't have great hand eye coordination, you will have horrible shots every single time, which is kind of the basis for golf. Golf is a game of precision. Reddit agrees that hand eye coordination is probably the most important factor in golf.

What you're describing in esports - reacting - is a mental ability.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:36:17 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

This is also my thinking. From my understanding, chess and poker and the like are not officially recognized as sports like esports are.

[deleted] ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 18:46:57 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Chess has been recognized as a sport by the International Olympic Committee since 2000.

jusjerm ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:52:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

It has been recognized as an option, but is still hoping for inclusion in the 2020 games. No Olympic medals have been awarded for classical chess

INGSOCtheGREAT ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:00:05 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

And I hope they don't for the same reason why Olympic soccer is stupid - they already have their own competitions that are held in higher regard.

BLG89 ยท -5 points ยท Posted at 17:42:55 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Chess is recognized as a sport by the International Olympic Committee.

So what? The International Olympic Committee also recognizes ballroom dancing as a sport (known as "dancesport"). It doesn't mean we're obligated to take it seriously along with basketball and association football.

LoompaOompa ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 18:53:38 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

You don't have to take it seriously, or even like it, but in what way is ballroom dancing not a sport? It's a competitive event in which teams perform and are judged, and at the end a victor is declared. It requires plenty of training and practice, and lots of control over one's body. Why isn't that a sport?

jusjerm ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 19:47:47 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'll preface this with the fact that I follow traditional sports a great deal, and esports not at all...

"Competitive gaming" is analogous to "esports". I think everyone understands that the e- prefix suggests the clear difference between this activity and what one would naturally consider a sport. That is, the contests are performed electronically on a shared screen or multiple screens, either in person or over the Internet. The sports part of it- other than it being more marketable than "competitive gaming"- is probably more useful to signify the organization and scope of what it has become.

Rather than living room battles of friend vs friend, it has grown to vast leagues and tournaments, with carefully structured teams and large prizes. The audience, too, is much different. It is no longer the friends waiting their turn in on your couch, but tens of thousands of people packed into arenas or otherwise watching online.

To me, the aspect of "sport" that this term denotes is not regarding the physical ability or athleticism, but the spectacle of the events.

championofobscurity ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 18:08:35 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Bowling, Golf and Archery are all considered sports and all require a very minimum amount of basic activity. Furthermore they don't require the physique of something like football as they are mostly technique based. You can argue that being in better shape might be of consequence to archery (though it's still 90% technique), but with both Bowling and Golf it's basically superfluous. Golf is so non-contingent on external factors, people say you are basically stuck with your swing your entire life, and that the challenge of improvement with Golf is essentially overcoming your own imperfections. Additionally taking 3 large steps and rolling a ball is also minimalistically intensive. So the idea that sports require some sort of full body action is not valid.

As it relates to Esports, the amount of physical mechanical acuity required to make things happen on screen at a level that is competitive is comparable to both archery and golf as well as bowling. It requires minimal physical movement but the technique is essential to being good. You can't just haphazardly bang on a keyboard and win either, so there's also something to be said about hand eye coordination. Furthermore the best Esports players average between 230-300 actions per minute.

Lastly, and most quantifiably. Esports is physical enough to sustain injury. More than anything else, the fact that a player has enough movement to sustain injuries that inhibit performance is probably the best quantifying factor in this argument. You can say there's a lack of movement all you want, but becoming injured and impaired is a direct consequence of movement.

[deleted] ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 19:19:35 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[deleted]

Emotic0n ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 19:27:38 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Poker is often also considered a sport

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:06:22 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I don't consider poker to be a sport.

championofobscurity ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:47:16 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

No they don't. They all use very few, very specific muscle groups.

If you are going to quantify standing as a full body action, then that's easily refuted by the fact that you can play E-sports at a standing desk.

jm0112358 ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:56:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

But...golf, bowling, and archery all take require fully body action.

Bowling doesn't require a whole lot of bodily action, and you can be good at bowling and be extremely out of shape.

Mitchiro ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:27:04 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Same with golf and archery.

wfaulk ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:46:27 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

And darts.

KairyuSmartie ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 20:39:09 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

iirc Formula 1 and Chess are considered sports as well

Macinapp ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 02:40:12 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Chess is a good comparison. Formula 1 requires an incredible amount of strength and stamina. Racing is certainly a workout. You have to be fit to drive those cars.

vl99 ยท 17 points ยท Posted at 17:36:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

the point being that physical activity was beneficial to the overall mind and psyche.

If the ultimate point is that the activity benefits your mind and psyche, then why wouldn't we consider e-sports to be sports?

The argument always comes back to whether the operative term in the word "sport" is the competitive aspect or the physical aspect.

I'd argue the competitive aspect is the more important part, evidenced by the fact that we already define activities that require minimal physical activity (such as golf, or bowling) as sports. And we don't define certain very physical activities as sports no matter how much physical ability is required as there is no competitive aspect (such as jogging).

[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 17:55:44 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[deleted]

vl99 ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 18:23:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Golf and bowling do require some physical skill.

I'd argue that the level of physicality required to play golf and bowling is so low as to be practically nil. The only physical requirement to play golf or bowling is that you not be disabled. An average person may not be able to just jump in against a super experienced competitive player and do as well, but the same can be said for e-sports.

What about running? There's tonnes of races all the time, and it's part of the Olympics. Jogging is just casual running (slower than 6mph).

Racing may be considered a sport, but running certainly isn't, at least colloquially. Like, if I told someone I was huge into playing sports, but my sport was just running around the lake near my house, even if I took it very seriously they'd still give me some looks.

You can take almost anything popularly considered a sport today, play it solo, and it would be questionable as to whether you were taking part in "sports" because the competitive aspect is so central to the definition in a way that the physical aspect isn't as much.

The fact that this conversation over whether e-sports are in fact sports comes up so often is evidence enough that the competitive nature is the operative defining point over the physical nature. The conversation over whether shooting lawn darts solo, doing laps around the track solo, doing laps in the swimming pool solo, etc are sports never even gets discussion because pretty much everyone would say they're flatly not sports.

[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:48:22 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

As far as bowling and golf, there's a high level of hand eye coordination and some level of strength in both of those. Many people have the ability to play golf, few have the ability to do so at a high level because the physical coordination required is high. Physically exhausting? Not really. Physically demanding in terms of physical ability? Yep. Depends on how you define physicality - does it just mean tiring or does it mean coordinated?

vl99 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:10:23 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

As far as bowling and golf, there's a high level of hand eye coordination and some level of strength in both of those.

Having a high level of hand eye coordination is essential in esports.

And there is a level of strength involved in golf, but you don't need it to play, you just need it to play well, which makes for a really weird definition of sports if that's what you go by. Then you're just judging it by how much physical training one needs to undergo prior to game day in order to play well, which complicates the definition for every other sport, if that's your baseline. That would call into question whether the weakest player on a soccer team was even playing a sport at all, despite the fact that he's taking part in the same activity as his teammates.

Depends on how you define physicality - does it just mean tiring or does it mean coordinated?

If it's defined as tiring, golf, bowling, curling etc. are suddenly no longer sports. If it means coordinated, then e-sports deserves consideration for being labeled under the umbrella of "sports."

My argument isn't so much that the physicality present in e-sports is 'physical enough' to make it a sport in the same league as basketball or football. My argument is more that the word "sport" is already inconsistently used, so any definition of sports that doesn't include e-sports would necessarily exclude many things that we already do consider to be sports.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:41:32 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

having a high level of hand eye coordination is essential in esports

I'm not sure I agree. Moving a mouse across a screen does not require a lot of hand eye coordination.

Needing a certain amount of something related to athleticism to play well is kind of the definition of sports. If your ability and performance in something is increased by increased athleticism, then that suggests it is an athletic endeavor. Anyone can do math, but smarter people can do math better/faster, thus math is a mental exercise. Same concept.

It's not just strength, it's overall athleticism. The weakest soccer player may also be the fastest, or have the best shot, or some other athletic talent that makes him a competent soccer player. Strength is just one component of athleticism.

I'm not suggesting golf or bowling is tiring. That wasn't my point of saying that. I was saying that you could exclude golf or bowling as sports depending on what your definition of athletic exertion is. Esports are even further removed.

Misuse of a word is hardly a justification. The better solution is to remove things like chess from sports and call them consistently competition. Physical competition has traditionally been called sport in the English language, and others are competition. Square - rectangle thing, sports are competitions but competitions aren't sports. And that's not putting down competitions, they're just not all sports.

vl99 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:44:59 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'm not sure I agree. Moving a mouse across a screen does not require a lot of hand eye coordination.

Moving a mouse across the screen to hit a precise point at a precise time takes a comparable amount of hand eye coordination to hitting a ball with a club, if not more.

Watch a video of a person who doesn't play video games very often playing halo versus a professional in a headshot competition. Now in your estimation do you think this competition will result in a tie?

Needing a certain amount of something related to athleticism to play well is kind of the definition of sports.

I don't believe you contested the relationship between hand eye coordination, dexterity, and athleticism, did you? If these are related to athletics, and esports require a high level to play well, then your argument as to why esports shouldn't be considered sports should amount to you trying to prove that it doesn't take any kind of coordination or dexterity to play esports well.

Misuse of a word is hardly a justification.

My argument hinges on the idea that things like golf, bowling, curling, etc would all be excluded from being considered sports by any definition that would seek to exclude esports. If you're fine with that and willing to exclude all those activities from being considered sports, then yeah my argument falls apart.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:09:14 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

With regards to your halo scenario, I did not say that esports didn't require skill or practice. But saying that being able to move a mouse to a precise spot quickly is equivalent to hitting an 80-100 mph baseball is silly, and I don't even have a huge amount of respect for baseball.

I think hand eye coordination is a part of athleticism, yes. But again, I don't believe esports require a significant amount of hand eye coordination. I think they require a large amount of thinking, information processing, and practice, but I don't think the physical portion is a significant component of success.

I would argue that there's a much more physicality in curling, bowling, and especially golf. Curling requires judgment of how hard you're throwing (curling, I guess?) as well as accuracy. Bowling has a small strength component as well as a heavy accuracy component. Golf is a full body activity and, while not super strenuous, certainly requires more hand eye coordination, strength, dexterity, etc. than something like esports.

cheerileelee ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:13:18 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:04:51 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Not really. The video showed that he had .34 second reaction time. It also mentioned the fact that it was a simple reaction - he was expecting something from the bush, and reacted to the malphite ult. That shows a lot of game knowledge.

First, that's not necessarily on par with other athletes. Kobe showed that a baseball player has .38 seconds to react to a 100 mph fastball. The difference here is that when wild turtle sees malphite go into the bush, even if he knows what's coming, he knows he's going to flash already. He just needs to flash on time. When a baseball is thrown, the batter has to decide in that .38 seconds whether or not he wants to swing. He has to actually make a decision in that time, not just react.

The other example given was a tennis serve - .35 seconds to arrive at the other end of the court. Notice that's not .35 to react. You have to react before that in order to position and swing. Both of those situations require a faster reaction time than wildturtles flash. Wildturtle may have a fast reaction time, but this play does not necessarily show him to be somehow superhuman or way above average.

Next, you're making an assumption that the general populations reaction time is pretty slow. The general populations reaction time is on average between .15 and .3 seconds. In other words, wildturtle, while making a play I certainly wouldn't have, isn't reacting faster than any average person, except for the fact that he has enough experience and game knowledge that he knows what's coming. Since he expects malph to flash ult him, he only has to react, not just make a decision. That's the difference between him and most of us in terms of making this play - your average joe, if he knew what was going to happen like wildturtle did, would be able to flash just as quickly.

Finally, while reaction time is very beneficial in most sports, I am unsure whether I would actually use that as a determinant of whether something is a sport, as reaction time is based on how quickly your brain can process information, making it a mental attribute rather than a physical one.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:24:15 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 00:53:57 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I am oversimplifying it, but the point is that moving a mouse precisely to a certain point does not take all that much coordination. I am arguing that games like league and dota are based mostly on skill and game knowledge, with an absolute bare minimum of hand eye coordination needed, certainly not on the level of baseball or golf, both sports that I am in no way interested in, by the way - I'm not just using them as a comparison because I enjoy them. I am using them because they commonly involve much less physical activity than other sports.

Madeanaccountyousuck ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 19:15:07 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Competitive video games are all about hand dexterity and coordination.

[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:24:11 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Coordination is not physical - military strategy requires coordination. Most jobs require coordination. And hand dexterity is included in a lot of things - painting, knitting, etc. - being able to accurately move a mouse does not a sport make.

vl99 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:35:12 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

FWIW, your comparisons to painting and knitting aren't really hitting home. The only issue I can see with competitive painting as a sport would be the subjectivity involved in judging the final product. If they found a way to fairly judge it though then why not?

And I see no reason at all why competitive knitting couldn't be considered a sport just like golf, bowling, or esports.

yertles ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 18:52:17 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'd argue that the level of physicality required to play golf and bowling is so low as to be practically nil.

In terms of raw strength, sure, however the amount of physical skill (coordination, etc.) required is high; there is a distinct and critical physical skill set required to play, which is not the case for an esport.

GroverCleaveland ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 19:17:03 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

You genuinely believe there is no physical skill or coordination required to average 4-5 precise manual inputs every second on a controller? How does that make sense? Do you think these people are just button mashing?

vl99 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 19:18:27 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

In terms of raw strength, sure, however the amount of physical skill (coordination, etc.) required is high; there is a distinct and critical physical skill set required to play, which is not the case for an esport.

No, there is a distinct and critical physical skill set required to play well. I can play golf horribly and still be playing a sport. Similarly, esports take a very high level of coordination and dexterity to be played well, with little physical strength required and little exertion during the actual competition.

yertles ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 20:17:18 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I still wouldn't consider the skills to be equivalent on a physical level. The average person already has all the physical skills needed to play an e-sport. They may not be very good, but to be able to functionally accomplish the basic goals/tasks, you just have to know how to use a keyboard and mouse. The same cannot be said for something like golf - the average person, if they have never played golf, is unlikely to be able to accomplish even the most basic tasks because a physical lack of skill.

The issue I have with this is it essentially expands the definition of "sport" to any activity that some people engage in at a highly competitive level, which I think removes some of the descriptive value because anything can then be a sport. You can take almost any activity imaginable, and if you do it at a very high level, there is some level of demanding-ness physically even though the physical actions themselves do not inherently require skill, regardless of the task Take knitting for example. I don't think many people would say that is a sport, nor something that requires much physical skill to accomplish the basics, but if I could show you a group of people who knit competitively and can do it much faster/better than the average person, then we can call it a sport.

At a certain point it is a semantics argument, but if you expand the definition to potentially include anything the word loses much of its utility. I understand the motive of labeling it as a sport, because I think participants want to lend more legitimacy to it and I have no problem with that, but I still don't think they are categorically similar to traditional sports in a very meaningful way.

vl99 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 20:55:53 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I still wouldn't consider the skills to be equivalent on a physical level. The average person already has all the physical skills needed to play an e-sport.The same cannot be said for something like golf.

I guess we're at an impasse then. I completely disagree with that statement and think the average person is totally capable of playing golf poorly. I don't think it would be impossible for someone who had never touched a club to pick up and play, albeit very badly.

Take knitting for example. I could show you a group of people who knit competitively and can do it much faster/better than the average person, then we can call it a sport.

Yeah, I think any definition of sport that includes esports would open itself up to include competitive knitting as well, but I don't know that there's anything wrong with that. My main argument is basically just that any definition of sports seeking to exclude esports would also exclude minimally physical sports like bowling and golf. But if someone's okay with that, then I'm not going to be able to refute them.

I still don't think they are categorically similar to traditional sports in a very meaningful way.

I think they're similar enough to existing sports I already mentioned to induct them under the sports umbrella based solely on that. I think the physical aspect linking activities like golf and bowling to the word sports is extremely tenuous in the same way that people complain about esports.

If golf, bowling, curling, bocce ball, etc weren't considered sports, I probably wouldn't even bother trying to convince OP otherwise. But as long as these sports are considered sports, I think it allows esports to be considered also.

yertles ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 21:31:06 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I don't think it would be impossible for someone who had never touched a club to pick up and play, albeit very badly.

I think that would be an interesting experiment, but my guess is that an average person who has never played golf before would not be able to hit the ball into the hole in a "reasonable" amount of time. Just out of curiosity, have you ever played a round of golf before on a real course?

IMO, if you're barely able to even make contact with the ball and hit it in the right direction and it would take you 50+ strokes to even reach the green, that isn't really "playing golf", and I think that's about the ability level of a large percentage of people who have never swung a club before, whereas most people who have used a computer could get the basics of keystrokes, mouse clicks, etc., needed to play an esport game at a rudimentary level. Not competitive with someone who plays recreationally or competitively of course, but well enough to functionally play the game.

Personally, I think the difference between traditional sports (baseball, football, etc.) and golf/bowling/etc., is about the same difference between golf/etc. and esports in the level of "sport-ness". To me, something like bowling is pretty questionable to be called a sport, and e-sports are even further on that spectrum and I don't consider them sports. I think the point is that it is more of a continuum than a binary.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:17:00 on June 22, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

Semantics.

If you aren't wavedashing across the stage and hitting every L-cancel, you aren't really "playing Melee"

You say that's not "playing golf". I say it is because I'm at a low skill level in golf.

I say that's not "playing Melee". You do because you're at a low skill level in Melee.

The best you can say is that the word "sports" is like "art" or "pornography". You can't really define it well, but you know it when you see it. In which case, there's no firm criteria to disagree on. No one is really going to change anyone's mind so there's no real point to this thread.

Madeanaccountyousuck ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:17:55 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

At the top level people playing competitive video games require just as much if not more hand-eye coordination and fine motor skills than a typical pro golfer.

digikun ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 07:23:59 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

The amount of manual dexterity required to play Starcraft at a competitive level is insane. We're talking dozens of commands that require pin-point mouse accuracy every second. Super Smash Bros Melee players put in so many inputs per second that there have been several pros who have developed inoperable hand injuries that forced them out of the game for life. I think you're severely underestimating the physical component of playing games. You don't just think things and they happen, you have to actually input the commands.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:08:56 on June 22, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

In terms of raw strength, sure, however the amount of physical skill (coordination, etc.) required is high; there is a distinct and critical physical skill set required to play, which is not the case for an esport.

Do you think playing certain video games professionally requires less physical skill than, say, bowling? I'd be inclined to disagree, or at least argue that they are comparable.

It can be argued that playing Super Smash Bros Melee professionally requires as much physical dexterity as playing, say, the piano professionally.

Unless your argument is not actually about the physicality in general, but instead about specific body parts (other than fingers).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8DpVE-E2LM

http://www.meleeitonme.com/aziz-hax-al-yamis-wrist-injury-poses-important-health-questions-to-the-melee-community/

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 19:08:56 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I agree.

nospecialhurry ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 19:32:28 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Here's a professional talking about the concept of APM.

A professional gamer can beat three normal players, in part, because of how dexterous and coordinated they are. It's difficult and uncomfortable for me to even try to make the movements that high level gamers make. Seriously. I have trouble with just hotkey bindings at my mid/lower-level play.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:09:51 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'm not disagreeing that video game players are talented and well trained, I simply don't think they are playing a game that should be considered a sport.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:06:22 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

The reason they are being called a sport is so that professional players can move to other countries on a sport visa. This is why countries are making them considered a sport. It really has nothing to do with physical aspects of the game at hand. It's just that there is enough money in esports, that they could push for legislation to allow for the equivalent of a sport visa so people could move from one country to another to complete. In league of legends for instance, the LCS matches are all in Germany and LA. It would be insane for kids from Korea, China or anywhere else to have to travel country to country every weekend almost year around.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:01:03 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Archery, bowling, darts, pool, golf, chess, ... All considered to be sports yet the amount of physical activity is negligeable; If we compare something like cycling with weight lifting, the amount of strength and calories burned are vastly different, are either of them less of a sport then the other? What is the tresshold needed to become a sport? What is a good measure for 'sport-ness'?

Things like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm-zilvu8F0 require an amazing amount of concentration, practice and control, why is it any less of a sport than bowling?

Sports used to be physical competition but we're long past that point. You can't just arbitrarily draw the line after golf but before esports.

Pipstydoo ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:18:03 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'd argue that the level of physicality required to play golf

The average length of a golf course is 4 miles in a straight line. That's just walking. Not carrying your bag. Not bending over to pick up your ball. No swinging and no putting. No walking up and down hills.

That's 4 miles every time Roger McHackinhunt - the guy who plays military golf (left, right, left) - has to walk before any of the other aforementioned actions.

Playing at a professional level is an entirely different beast.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 17:58:00 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Debate is also competitive, but is not considered a sport at all. Competition does not define a sport to me, it's the mix of physical activity and competition.

vl99 ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 18:12:25 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Debate is also competitive, but is not considered a sport at all.

Sure, but as I pointed out above, the current definition of "sport" is usually inconsistently applied (and usually by the same people that vehemently oppose classifying e-sports as sports) to existing activities.

Golf is considered a sport, but with caddies who do all the heavy lifting, and golf carts to transport you from one hole to another, the only physical activity involved are those few swings.

Bowling is considered a sport, but the physical activity involved there is minimal as well. Outside of walking to the top of the lane and one or two arm swings with an object weighing a few pounds at the end, you're not doing much of anything else on your turn.

Other things like archery, shot put, luge, curling, etc require people with honed skill and physical ability, but the actual act involved in the competitive aspect requires little physical exertion, yet all these are considered sports.

Similarly, it requires someone with incredibly honed dexterity to be able to compete seriously in e-sports, even though the actual competition itself won't feature much physical activity. Unless you're proposing declassifying all of the above sports listed and labeling them games (or whatever) rather than sports, then this is already enough reason we should use the already inconsistent application of the word "sports" to apply it to e-sports.

badoosh123 ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 20:31:07 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Other things like archery, but the actual act involved in the competitive aspect requires little physical exertion

The fact that you think archery requires little physical exertion kinda proves the point that you are grossly wrong about what constitutes as "physical" and what doesn't. Hard to take the point seriously if you think moving a joystick around is the same amount of physical force as archery or bowling.

z3r0shade ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 21:26:00 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

How is it not? Why do you believe that archery or bowling have high physical exertion requirements?

badoosh123 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 21:40:05 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

A full-length longbow could have draw weights up to 180lbs. Have you ever actually shot a longbow? It takes a lot of core strength and balance.

bamfbarber ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:35:44 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Citation needed? I shoot long how for fun and the highest pull weight in have ever come across is 120. Most competitive bowmen use low pull bows because it's not the weight it's the accuracy. Also discrediting his argument based off one wrong metric when he used a lot more sports is not a good debate tactic.

cdb03b ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:38:56 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Bows require a massive amount of physical exertion. Long bows have between 140lbs and 180lbs pull. Even light weight beginner bows have over 60lbs pull. It takes an incredible amount of strength to draw and hold that then release it and hit something accurately.

pikk ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:50:31 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

one or two arm swings with an object weighing a few pounds at the end

One or two swings x 10(+2) frames x 4-10 games in the tournament x between 8-16 pounds depending on your ball weight =


800-3200 pounds of weight moved.

Bowling may not be require as extreme athleticism as basketball or tennis, but it requires a lot of strength and endurance in your back, shoulder, forearm and wrist. Moving a ton or more of bowling balls one at a time is serious business.

EDIT: Formatting

SoHughman ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:45:55 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I'd argue the competitive aspect is the more important part

I disagree. You can have competitive card games, but they're games, not sport. You can have competitive art competitions, but they're competitions, not sport. You can have a bet with your little brother to see who can find the most red pebbles in five minutes, but that's a way to pass the time, not a sport. There are so many things that are competitive, but, of these, only a few of them are sports. Sports are a test of your physical abilities that extend beyond your thumbs, a practical understanding of real world physics, and local opponents in-the-flesh who aren't obscured by a monitor.

evidenced by the fact that we already define activities that require minimal physical activity (such as golf, or bowling)

These activities aren't physically minimal though. They require you to be on your feet, using most of your body, a certain amount of strength and form, and an understanding of the physics of the real world. They're not as physically intensive as some sports, but surely you see how they're a few steps ahead of sitting in front of League of Legends mashing your mouse and hotkeys?

And we don't define certain very physical activities as sports no matter how much physical ability is required as there is no competitive aspect (such as jogging).

Uh, yeah, the fact that there is no competition is literally why it isn't a sport. Competition is still essential to the definition, otherwise it's just an activity that is physically intensive; i.e. a form of exercise. The same way hitting a ball back and forth with a friend is a game of tennis (sport), whereas hitting an indefinite stream of ball back towards an automatic ball thrower is just practice (exercise).

vl99 ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 20:01:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I disagree. You can have competitive card games, but they're games, not sport...

And like I said, you can have physical activities that aren't sport either. I'm saying the competitive aspect is the most important part, not the only one.

These activities aren't physically minimal though.

I think the length that you've gone to try and present golf and bowling as if they don't require a minimal amount of physical exertion/activity is admirable, but it's a disingenuous assessment trying to present a sport that amounts to 0 physical exertion and no more actual activity than a few steps and a swing as if it's at all difficult to do. I don't deny it takes all kinds of well honed skills to play golf at a high competitive level, but the same can be said for esports.

In any case, the level of physicality involved in those activities is certainly more comparable mashing hotkeys than it is to playing football.

Uh, yeah, the fact that there is no competition is literally why it isn't a sport. Competition is still essential to the definition, otherwise it's just an activity that is physically intensive; i.e. a form of exercise.

Uh, yeah. Agree 100%. I'm saying that the competitive aspect is the most important part of defining what constitutes a sport. The physical aspect is secondary, since we consider things like luge, curling, golf, chess, and bowling to be sports.

cheerileelee ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:39:31 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

As far as the physicality of esports, it varies from video game to video game. Just as the physical requirements for curling and sportfishing are very different to the more physically demanding sports.

For this example I will use Starcraft Brood War in Korea, which is the original eSport. While FPS eSports was developing in the west simultaneously out of the Mountain Dew Dorito chips trash talking gamer image, eSports in the east was intimately linked with real sports.

The way sports are run in Korea are such that you'll have a major company owning a franchise, such as SK Telecom or Samsung, or KT "Korean Telecom" Rolster. These franchises span across multiple professional sports. Imagine if the New York Yankees in addition to their Major League Baseball Team had a NHL Hockey Team, NBA Basketball team, NFL Football team and they were all called the New York Yankees. This is how many professional sports teams in Korea are, only their franchises also included eSports teams as well, for starcraft, sudden attack, counterstrike, kart rider, etc...

For example SKT T1 - their korean site looks much better

Now these professional organizations are run the same way that any other major sports organization is structured and run. With scouts, coaches, rosters, training squads. The korean head of esports KeSPA is a korean Congressman and is mentioned in the same breath as other sport charimen, and for a while the Korean Air Force had it's own starcraft team Air Force ACE so that progamers could do their mandatory military service and continue their careers.

Keep in mind this has been going on since about 2000ish in Korea. This has been on mainstream television on 2 24 hour tv channels dedicated to 'esports' contents (one of them pretty much is just a Go / Baduk channel tbh though)

Now that's to set the stage as far as context is concerned.

As far as the physical aspect of it, starcraft is a highly mechanical sport. There is a physical limit and cap to what you can do called APM and back in brood war, having less than 400 APM would be the equivalent of being a slower soccer player.

This is exhausting. Some of the faster players would essentially be playing Flight of the Bumblebee on the piano for 30-40 minutes, except on a keyboard along with a mouse along while also having to deal with the strategic competition portion of a game. There was a Day9 Daily where he talked about trying to get really fast APM and just coming out of a game completely drenched in sweat over how hard that is to do. I remember back when the first foreigners (non koreans) were trying to go to korea to train with the korean teams, the korean players would make fun of them for being out of shape physically. Why? Because if you were a fat out of shape western stereotype basement gamer that meant you physically would not be able to keep up with the competition. You physically would be left in the dust and you wouldn't have the stamina to stay mentally sharp and physically at your peak.

So when you say there is no physical training, I have no clue what you are talking about because in Korea, that is taken as seriously as the baseball team

Until you have video game competition where you just plug into somebody's brain rather than having them manipulate something physically like a baseball bat, golf club, tennis racket, or mouse and keyboard, I'd say eSport deserves to be considered Sport.

[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 18:01:27 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

The fact that they label themselves as e-sport seems to heavily imply that they recognize themselves as a subcategory of sports: one where electronic equipment is involved. As long as they clarify that their sport is an e-sport, and they call themselves competitive/professional gamers rather than athletes, I don't see a problem with the nomenclature.

Video game players are likening themselves to elite athletes without the same amount of training it takes to become a true athlete

Source for this? I can't imagine any context where a professional gamer claims he's an athlete in gaming and isn't laughed off the stage.

[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 17:22:12 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

[deleted]

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:35:57 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Fair, but does league of legends really involve body control? Games like that are about skill and strategy, not really physical ability.

On the other hand, golf, for example, requires a lot of hand eye coordination, some power, etc.

[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 17:43:54 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:49:15 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I play league, and I disagree. How would you say it does? It requires some amount of skill - knowing when to use abilities and time things correctly, but that doesn't require any actual physical exertion outside of the ability to type. A minimal amount of dexterity is needed, and that's about it.

Status_Flux ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 17:47:51 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

You absolutely need physical ability in lol, and even moreso in dota or StarCraft. You need to be able to accurately click different parts of the screen and tap different buttons on the keyboard extremely quickly. That's part of the reason the best players tend to be in their late teens or early 20s. Older players physically cant keep up.

[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 18:01:56 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

So anyone without Parkinson's who can type 100 words per minute had a shot? If being able to mouse accurately and press keys in a quick manner is the only requirement, that is an extremely low bar for athleticism.

The reason the best players are in their late teens or early 20s is because they're video games that have been out for less than 20 years, and have been viable as a source of income for a very small group of people for maybe 5-10 years. Of course only teens and young 20s are the only people who are good. Older people didn't grow up with league or SC or dota, and there's no incentive for them to seriously compete.

Status_Flux ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:31:46 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Of course only teens and young 20s are the only people who are good. Older people didn't grow up with league or SC or dota, and there's no incentive for them to seriously compete.

There are plenty of people in their mid-late twenties who also grew up with video games. People also frequently retire from pro esports in their mid 20s as they lose reaction time and physical ability, in addition to other reasons like burnout.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:41:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

True, but how many of those people grew up in a time where esports were a legitimate way of making money? I'm 22, and it basically wasn't an option for even me - mlg stuff started popping up when I was like 15 or 16 but that was the first time I had seen anything about the possibility of actually making any money in video games. Why would people who are 30, who were in their mid twenties when mlg even came about, pause their careers to go into video games? You're acting like esports has been a career path for more than a couple years.

People retire from esports to start long term careers, or to make money streaming (another thing that's come out in the last few years in a legitimate way). How many people make actually decent money playing esports? Most realize at age 20 or 22 that they can't do it forever and stop to do something else.

vl99 ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 18:26:38 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

100 WPM is nothing to sneeze at, especially considering less than half that, at 30-40 is usually the only requirement to get a job involving heavy computer use in most industries. Also your argument is the equivalent of me saying "so all you have to be able to do is hold a racket and occasionally use it to hit a ball? Sounds like a low bar for athleticism."

[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 18:31:31 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Except that's actual physical activity, and involves running and physical exertion. "All you have to do is be fast and run a lot and have good hand eye coordination" is much different than "all you have to do is move your wrist a few centimeters while seated".

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:03:18 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

[deleted]

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:09:26 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

All of what you're describing is mental - processing information is a mental ability, not a physical one. And hand eye coordination in terms of moving a mouse is a really, really shake foundation to define something as a sport. If that's your only connection to physicality, then competitive painting is a sport, and arguably more of a sport than a video games because that takes much more fine motor control. Or competitive crocheting.

I'm not criticizing video games - they take a lot of skill and practice and certain people are much better at them than others. Some of that is talent based. But they are competitions, not sports, because they are not significantly physical. I play league and played wow before that and neither of them was in any way physically taxing.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:39:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[deleted]

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:50:44 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I will say that I have coworker's who have developed carpal tunnel from overuse due to being on a computer all day, but I certainly will not deny that pro gamers are at a high risk for the issue due to lots of play.

[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 18:17:02 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Playing a video games is not a physical activity, but professional esports player and professional sportsmen have the same job: They compete with each other for the entertainment of viewers.
A lot of people do not understand what it is to be a professional sportsman. You're not paid a lot because you're very skilled and strong, you're paid a lot because you provide good entertaiment.
ESPN doesn't deal in sport as a physical activity, it deals in sport as an entertainment, this is why they stream League of Legends.

BenIncognito ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 17:25:53 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I think by calling esports actual sports, we are undermining the importance of physical activity.

Can you explain your thought process behind this?

woahmanitsme ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 20:14:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

They don't call them sports

They call them esports. Nobody is arguing email is different than mail cause of course it is that's why it's called a different thing

The only reason for government classification to call it a sport is that there are permits for travel visas based on being an athlete. It's just a formality

Yvl9921 ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 20:57:29 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

There have been plenty of good responses so far about the physical dexterity needed to play games at a high level, but something I don't think has been addressed yet is WHY we need them as "sports." This isn't just to be trendy and say, "Oh, yeah, we're athletes too, see how legitimate we are?"

In some countries, like Russia, there's not an official government recognition of eSports as an actual legitimate job. This makes it impossible for people to get visas and travel throughout Europe to compete in tournaments. I don't have the article on hand right now so I'm a little foggy on the details, but I'm pretty sure this is what happened to Diamond (and others) from League of Legends. He lost his job, his team, everything because of visa issues and countries deciding "He's just doing this to play games, it's not a real job" despite him probably making more than them. Thus the push to define them as regular sports, which has been established as a real profession over centuries. No country is going to say that "athlete" is not a real profession in this day and age.

penguin_poon ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:30:53 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

ESPN shows poker and chess. You may think of those as more of a game than a sport but what about hunting or fishing? What about golf? Where do you draw the line that decides the level of physical exertion necessary for something to be considered a sport?

Up_Trumps_All_Around ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:02:13 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I think by calling esports actual sports, we are undermining the importance of physical activity. Why not just simply call it what it is: "gaming?"

What do you think the real difference between a game and a sport is? Esports are only really talked about at a professional level; if I go online to play a game of Counter Strike with some internet strangers, or even with friends, I doubt you're thinking of esports. Similarly if I go and play Basketball with some people or friends it's normally referred to as a pick-up game, not a sport. Both Basketball and Counter Strike become sports when played competitively.

The above is largely semantics, as is the argument in general, but there are also legal ramifications to recognizing a sport officially. Players in recognized sports in the US are able to obtain visas to play their sport in their team's country. In esports, this allows formation of multinational teams that can practice with consistently fair ping.

HaricotNoir ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:06:03 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Out of curiosity - in your opinion, do you consider Professional Drone Racing a sport? Or is it an eSport? Both? Neither?

I ask because your answer may influence how best to approach trying to CYV.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:15:06 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I don't see that as a sport, no.

HaricotNoir ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:25:06 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

OK, but if they are not a sport, are they an e-sport (since the pilots are racing the drones by looking at live feeds from onboard cameras)? Or are you saying it is not a sport at all? What about Formula 1 or NASCAR? Do you consider those sports?

BlckJck103 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:24:12 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

In Greek culture, sport was hugely emphasized for the physical benefits it gave.

And if we were sitting in Athens 2500 years ago I'd probably agree. In the 21st century however there's lots of different ways of looking at what a "sport" is. Should e-sports be considered a sport by a charity trying to get kids healthy? No. Neither should horse dressage or clay pigeon shooting, both of those are olympic events. Should they be considered a sport by ESPN? Yes, because they're a competition that attracts large audiences and is growing rapidly.

I think by calling esports actual sports, we are undermining the importance of physical activity

No, everyone is well aware of the importance of physcial activity and this does nothing to change that.

Video game players are likening themselves to elite athletes without the same amount of training it takes to become a true athlete.

Do you know the time it takes to be an elite athelete in every sport? Do you also know the training it takes to become a top player in esports? Some superstars appear at 17-18 and yes it takes them time to develop but they can still be top players.

Some sports are more competitive and take more training than others, making it to the top of a big sport takes a lot of effort but making it to the top of a smaller sport requires less effort. Esports are new and therefore the competition is growing and not at its peak, 50 years ago top athletes played at an international level at multiple sports. Today this would be unheard of because the time you have to invest simply means you can't play two sports at the highest level.

Esports do not demonstrate physical skill, only mental skill. Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

Not all sports are particularly impressive to me, not all sports equally emphasise physical and mental aspects. That isn't an argument they aren't sports, just that you don't like them. The speed and precision required my most e-sports is at a very high level that you won't be able to replicate without years of practice. It minght not impress you but it's still worthy of note.

ESPN is discussing deals to stream League of Legends on their channel.

Do you think ESPN was thinking about the Greek ideals of sport or the fact they would make money? Esports are growing, fast. Tournamnets are worth millions of dollars in prize money and attracting a viewership that most regular sport channels would kill for. There's money in it and therefore the "sport" channels will incorporate it because if they don't someone else will.

In the end it's not that different from when "extreme" sports began to become more popular, esports aren't the same as most sports, but niether is gymnastics or diving or clay pigeon shooting. All of these things however are "played" competively and have people that are interested enough to follow them. They are also best presented in a sports style with tournaments, live commentary, analysis etc.

Pingk ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:26:10 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Darts is widely considered a sport, but I'd hardly say the majority of darts players are athletic in the traditional sense of the word.

It requires a great deal of hand-eye coordination, but so do esports. I'd say if you consider one a sport, it'd be hypocritical not to do likewise to the other.

F1_Chico ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:09:34 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

It seems to be just a matter of definition. If, in your understanding, the category "sports" must include only activities which are based in physical athleticism or physical dexterity, then esports are not sports, and that seems to be the consensus among the main sports organizations, such as the IOC and SportAccord, although the latter recognizes activities such as chess, bridge and go, as mind sports.

Definition according to SportAccord

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:45:05 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

But to some people it is. Enough to pay to see games. Enough to have 6mil$ prizes for top players. Who cares how it's labelled? It's a game, played in teams, that people want to watch. In that sense, it is the same as football or basketball.

HyliaSymphonic ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:07:41 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

First of all, "not impressive to me at all" is entierly subjective so how would one going about changing that? The input speed for something like starcraft certainly seems impressive to me? You seemed focused on the idea that certain physicality is less valid than other forms? Is a marathon runner less of an athlete because they can't throw like quarterback? Is a golfer less of athlete than a baseball player or visa versa depending on what muscle groups they work? A Starcraft player certainly has more developed hand muscles than a line backer.

Secondly, I'd like to point out that the push to get esports recognized as sports has little to do with cultural attitudes and much more to deal with legal definitions. Take for instance the case of Leffen, a Super Smash Bros. Melee player who was denied entry into the US because "Melee isn't a sport." The current push is to get recognized as athletes in a legal sense more than a cultural sense. This sentiment is not just founded on "feeling" like esports are sports but also that these visas have been already extended to chess players.

R2Doucebag ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:35:43 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Cheerleading is called a sport, so why can't exports be one too?

rsmithspqr ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:58:52 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I feel like at lest in the modern day that sports are more about watching people or teams compete at something than physical activity. The classic sports are physical because everybody has a body and can work towards at competing better with minimal equipment.

Older sports like football(soccer) just need a ball and something to mark goals, but newer sports like hockey, lacrosse (I know the Iroquois played way back when but it is really pretty modern in the western word as a sport) need more complex equipment to compete, making money and technique more important. Esports could just be all money and technique and a continuation of the trend

SCphotog ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:08:41 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

It's NOT a sport, that's why we have the distinction, the 'e' on the front. It shares some parallels with sports, but it's not so we call it something different.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:16:13 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

What about recognizing esports as sports solely for the sake of allowing its players to be able to travel to other countries to compete? I know esports players have been delayed, or denied from going to other countries, that under an athletes visa.

yaxamie ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:23:08 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

From Wikipedia:

In 2013, Canadian League of Legends player Danny "Shiphtur" Le became the first pro gamer to receive a United States P-1A visa, a category designated for "Internationally Recognized Athletes"

There are laws and rules that an "official" recognition of an eSports grants, in the US we have a visa program that makes it easier for a sports team to get the best players.

League of Legends pro teams recruit players from other countries just like a soccer or hockey team might.

Until there's a gaming or entertainment visa, we should continue to regard it as a sport.

Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

Archery and sharp shooting are sports as well. Is that impressive to you?

HideNZeke ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:44:35 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

As far as government goes: esports might as well be sports. whether you think "sport" should be designated for physical activity (which I would, despite watching more dota than football these days), the function of both of them is roughly the same. they need visas and other things like that just as as "real sports" do. It just makes more sense for a government to add it to the sports laws than make whole new legislation for them.

and for espn making deals with lol: they already made deals with poker, golf, and nascar. so there is precedent that they just want to showcase good competition over physical activity

Quotes_League ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:19:09 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*

An important thing to keep in mind is that a large purpose of getting the legal distinction of being a "sport" is to assist in acquiring visas for professional level players. Sometimes getting the authorization to travel has proven to be difficult, particularly in Europe, and has prevented some players from competing. I think that's why Russia recognized it as a sport. I don't think the industry really view itself as a sport, hence the name E-sport.

There are those who view it as something similar to a sport, but I think they are in the minority. And some of the elite players will practice upwards of 14 hours a day, just an FYI.

Holophonist ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:37:00 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I don't necessarily disagree with your conclusion, but I take issue with some of your reasoning, specifically:

Video game players are likening themselves to elite athletes without the same amount of training it takes to become a true athlete. The mental training may be similar, but in actual sports, mental and physical training are emphasized. Esports do not demonstrate physical skill, only mental skill. Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

How are you quantifying how much training these people are doing? Top tier players play ~14 hours a day. The fact that it's not physically demanding means they spend that much more time honing their skills. Professional swimmers aren't swimming 14 hours a day, because they would die if they did.

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 06:08:15 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

[removed]

RustyRook ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:29:10 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Sorry Naivy, your comment has been removed:

Comment Rule 1. "Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OPโ€™s current view (however minor), unless they are asking a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to comments." See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, please message the moderators by clicking this link.

xereo ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 07:53:33 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Should racing be a sport? There's a reason it's called Moto sport and why competitive gaming is called esport

Beard_of_Valor ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:14:35 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Sports are valuable for their Greek definition, but that is not the only value of "sport". A lot of it is about team work and individual skill, pushing the limits of humanity. Tiddlywinks or Quarters or bocce ball fit your definition but not my definition. Which definition is sportier?

If no delta, please clarify your argument.

P.S. golf

joe_frank ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:16:26 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

There are many different classifications of "sports", where "sport" is the broad category and "esport" would be the subcategory.

For example, there is nothing inherently sporty about sitting in a car and making left turns for 500 miles but it is still difficult and a physical competition so we call NASCAR a "motorsport."

Skydiving isn't inherently sporty but it does take physical skill so we call it an "extreme sports."

There's nothing inherently sporty about sitting on a jet ski or standing at the wheel of a boat or fishing but it does take some sort of physical ability so we call those "water sports."

In the same way that it does take some sort of physical ability to be so good on the controls that you could beat the best players in the world at a video game. So, yes, esports will never be as physically demanding as your classic sports but that's why we give it a subcategory.

Essentially, we already make the distinction that not all sports are created equally so we subcategorize them to avoid any confusion.

Pipstydoo ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:11:26 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Their maneuvers with the mouse and keyboard or controller are not impressive at all to me.

Have you ever tried your hand at these games against players of even moderate skill?

Esports do not demonstrate physical skill, only mental skill.

What is hand/eye coordination if not a physical skill? How about twitch shooting or micro management?

NeedHelpWithExcel ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:50:38 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Video game players are likening themselves to elite athletes without the same amount of training it takes to become a true athlete.

This has literally never happened.

For all intents and purposes classifying professional esports as a sport is perfectly valid. The only reason for doing so is for travel Visas anyways.

ZigguratOfUr ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:03:29 on June 22, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Shooting is an olympic event, and does not directly involve athleticism.

GroverCleaveland ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 18:58:11 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Not to presume ignorance on your part, but have you ever attempted to play any sort of high APM video game versus a good opponent? Take Super Smash Brothers Melee for example. There is a lot of physical practice you have to put in to attain the level of control that these players have over their in game character. Consider the video, then realize that not only were those inputs rapidly executed, but due to the precision of the game engine, if they had accidentally brushed over another button in any of those sequences, they would have likely lost their life rather than take the opponent's. This requires an intense dedication to both physical practice, and an incredible awareness of the game engine and what any character can do in game at any given time from any given position, as well as an ability to cognitively 'read' your opponent's habits and strategies. Think of it like a martial arts competition where players are only fighting with their fingers. Just because there's some arbitrary amount of physical exertion you deem 'impressive' to you personally doesn't mean there isn't physical exertion happening. A top melee player "Hax" even had to get hand surgery after his intensely technical playstyle essentially crippled his hand. Do you not define Golf as a sport simply because it's not as physically strenuous as football? Golf is a primarily mental game, which requires a disciplined physical practice to understand the fine motions of your own swing, but little other physical practice. Similarly many Esports are primarily mental games which require a disciplined physical practice of the fine motions of your manual digits.

Sports aren't lauded because of the physical benefits they provide to their practitioners, that's called exercise. Are we going to pretend it's healthy to be a pro boxer or pro American football player? These players regularly suffer extreme bodily trauma that impairs them further as people than if they'd never done the sport at all. Sports are respected because we see people doing things that we personally know we aren't capable of and it impresses us. Just because you have no personal access to understanding what is so impressive about attaining the mastery required to play top level competitive video games doesn't mean it's not there.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 19:05:26 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I was actually a semi pro smash player back in the day! Was competitive from about 2006-2009, but never considered myself to be playing a sport. It was always a video game.

[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 19:51:49 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

You ignored the entire post... Read it carefully. all your initial arguments are debunked.

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 21:05:13 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

I didn't ignore the post, I simply disagree.

hbomb30 ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 21:13:17 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

That defeats the entire purpose of this sub. He gave a long, well thought out response to your OP. If you just say "I disagree" without trying to go through and refute his points or reinforce your own, why are you here?

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ brodymitchell ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 21:31:22 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

None of his arguments are original - you can read the other comments I've made about the physicality of video games. I don't consider the physical components to be similar at all.

cheerileelee ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:55:03 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Would you say that Billiards, Bowling, Curling, Golf, and Race Car Driving are not sports?

These athletes are far more concerned with technique than physicality.

It's the same way for various video games. The difference between Call of Duty and Starcraft is like the difference between Bowling and MMA in terms of physical requirement in the game

[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 14:11:10 on June 21, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

You played smash. Perfect example. Do you follow the game still? If so do you know that guys like Leffen and Armada are trying to get visas so they can come to more U.S tournaments. This is why countries are now considering Esports a sport. This allows for sport visas to be issued to these players so they can compete. You may not consider it a sport, and that's fine. You can also call magenta, purple and we can disagree. But the reasoning for considering it a sport in a context of legislation is very reasonable.

GroverCleaveland ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 19:11:46 on June 20, 2016 ยท (Permalink)

Again, I ask what metric you use to justify that other than "I never considered it a sport". Because the physical practice of real top level esports is not comparable to 'semi-pro smash player' in the same way that I could walk onto a golf course and hit balls without dedicating myself to practice and nobody would call me an athlete either.

EDIT: Would also point out that due to technical shifts in the metagame, smash is essentially a COMPLETELY different physical discipline than it was in 06-09.