As someone who works in a automation company. OH god please no. But yes at the same time.
browwiw ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 00:44:38 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is more an /r/futurology thought, but actual AI with strong voice recognition/synthesis technology will end human tech support and probably be a massive blow to India's tech support economy.
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 02:41:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Only because tech support got waaaay worse since the 90's. I had a "tier 3" guy from the philipines put system32 into a zip file and delete it to save space.
Took out a production server part of a massive EMR system I run.
My director has been "re-assigned"
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:07:52 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 04:44:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
500+ clinics, 3 9's uptime.
In business critical environments, you can't even outsource the simple stuff. Risk is too high.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 04:56:02 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:02:28 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I've built 2 large EMR environments running different software. One designed for clinics, the other designed for multiple hospitals relying heavily on intersystem HL7 messaging.
One system acts as a central EMR system for every hospital in the city, so no matter which hospital you show up at they'll have your entire up to date history (attending, xrays, pharma, etc etc) with just your name or phone number. Even has built drug interaction and procedural risk assessment (Cerner Multum integration). Not as smart as those first year arts bernie supporters though.
[deleted] ยท -6 points ยท Posted at 00:54:09 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
browwiw ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 01:27:54 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Please dear God Kek, who wathces over us and blesses us with memes and lulz, please give me a future that contains McD's where I don't have to interact with sassy windowlicking burnouts to get a meal.
browwiw ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 02:27:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They could literally just turn the touch screen picto-gram register around and let you order and pay that way.
dynf ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:04:26 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Such kiosks exist now in McDonald's in France. McDonald's in France kicks ass and McDonald's in America is annoying and disgusting in comparison. They're very different places.
Nothing is wrong with the act of working at a fast food place.
Unfortunately the majority of people who make that choice do so out of lack of options. Low education. Low professionality. Unrefined manners. Etc.
This is reflected in the user experience of interacting with them when making orders.
By contrast , here in Japan, fast food workers are fast, polite, and professional. They take pride in their job. Even if it's min wage. It's a culture thing.
birdboy can't make high energy trade deals that will actually bring back the american economy and abundant good paying jobs. trump will do more for the black youth in 1 year than obama ever fucking did.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 04:02:25 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lol - grew up in a trailer living on food bank. Slept on a couch because grandma had my bedroom. Last time I checked I am about as Caucasian as one can get - Czech and Scandinavian. Yah I know poor.
[deleted] ยท -15 points ยท Posted at 21:46:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:55:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท -10 points ยท Posted at 21:57:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:58:17 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Nema_K ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:06:28 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I mean, there's also a lot more white people than black people in the country. If you're looking at pure numbers than yea you're right but there's a significantly higher percentage of poor minorities than poor white people.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:29:39 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Nema_K ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 23:20:31 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When I first replied he only had the part in all caps. I was just pointing out that saying there's more poor white people than poor black people is a stupid argument because there's almost 3x as many white people than black people in the US. Percentages should really be used for those kind of comparisons.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 22:07:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:14:10 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:24:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:32:43 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well you might be wrong about the poverty rate, but its the welfare rate that counts. Despite the fact that there are far more whites in poverty welfare distribution is almost equal according to DOC http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:36:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 22:17:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:27:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:35:40 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:01:19 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:06:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:27:46 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:20:48 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:07:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:17:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
It's funny how you talk about race the most and then call everyone else racists
GTFO
BAETLA ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:09:28 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nice response. Now this time I want you to try as hard as you can to not bring up race. Make any point you would like, but nothing to do with race. Healthcare? Foreign policy? Social issues? Let's talk about it, but don't bring up race. Believe it or not by trying to be as racially tolerant as possible, you end being as racially intolerant as the people you are defending against.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:19:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Politics in America is about race, has been since the civil rights act got passed. Why would he lie about the realities of relative poverty of the two communities?
Most minorities would probably be Republicans if they had followed Eisenhower lead with desegregating the military and been the ones to pass racial equality.
Every since then that's what politics is about. Now I could just talk about policy and why it matters. But that's not what animates most of you. It's race, that's how we got these ideological monstrosity that is the Republican party and the corporatist democrats.
Republican strategists openly talked about this, this isn't' a secret. It was called the Southern Strategy. That's the legacy the modern Republican party is built on. Not Lincoln or Eisenhower. Nixon and the silent racist majority now turned minority
"Don't talk about race it shouldn't be talked about let's just pretend that nothing we do could possibly have a racial animus even though we're America" lol
That's not going to happen
BAETLA ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:27:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Race being brought up in every discussion is part of the reason racism still exists. We need to discuss what would benefit Americans, not certain ethnic groups.
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:40:56 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Again we know there are racist policies passed in America, we know there are racists who hold power. They did it overtly not long ago
A white nationalist successfully won office in 88 in Louisiana. David fuckign Duke
I'm all for not calling Trump a racist when he hasn't done something racist. Like saying unlimited immigration isn't good for America and illegals need to go home. That's not racist.
Telling a black protester he should go get a job may not even be racist. But it's clearly a dog whistle whether he consciously meant it that way or just thought of them as lazy hippies. It has political implications
He's definately courting the white nationalist vote or he'd be telling everyone how he's going to be GREAT for cops AND reduce the amount of non violent drug offenders in prison.
He doesn't, because everything in American politics is viewed through the lense of race.
If political strategists think about these things then you as an American citizen would be an idiot not to. These are the people who determine whether or not a campaign is going to be racially animated not you or I.
And all the evidence says Republican campaign managers consciously court white nationalists in many parts of the country.
BAETLA ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:43:44 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I understand what you are saying but I wish it wasn't that way. Race baiting is definitely a political strategy and it is being used like a cheap hooker in this election.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:52:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's the reality of the Republican party, it's a monstrosity built on racial animus.
Trump is doing a very interesting thing. I was really hopeful he would draw the line at Latinos and really court black voters.
He's taken the opposite and more conservative approach of just sticking with racial animus though. "law and order" voter is the same thing as racist voter.
On what planet doesn't he deserved to get burned for this?
He should be out there saying "cops have too much to do we need to tone down these drug laws and make it less of a priority so they aren't busting down doors for small bags of reefer so they have time to focus on the rapists and murderers"
Instead we get more dog whistles about locking black men up. Whether he's a racist or not he's running a campaign with not very subtle white nationalist overtones.
edit - and he should add in some shit about it being unsustainable and we shouldn't be paying private prisons to lock people who aren't a threat to people or property.
BAETLA ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:55:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well I will respectfully agree to disagree with your entire statement quite honestly. Thank you for being civil.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:25:49 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:29:25 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes brown America shaped American politics?
Do you hear yourself?
We were over 80% white when views on race became the main determinant of your party affiliation. Because that's how the Republcian strategists crafted their policy, that's how we went from Eisenhower with huge public spending and desegregating the military to the Reagan talking about "welfare queens" and a fucking democrat getting away with doing the same in Clinton
You can blame Jews maybe, but brown America? lol
There was no agency. There was no brown mainstream media, brown politicians, brown bankers, brown lawyers. lol
And I would quibble with the argument that Jews some how stoked racial tensions instead of healed them in this country. Bigotry isn't good for business. Teaching children about the realities of American history is not stoking racial tensions.
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:29:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A delusional and senile old fuck who's lost touch with reality. Tragic... I really feel for his family at this point.
Dryad2 ยท 33 points ยท Posted at 19:49:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The ban hammer is swift and deadly wow.
I couldn't even reply with facts to those who were crying that executives make more.
Anyways I still would like to add to the discussion that. The biggest group of employers is the small business sector (under 500 employees).
The small business sector do not have access to corporate welfare on the level the multinationals do.
So raising min wages to $15 is raising costs to a small business owner.
Small businesses cannot outsource their employees in most cases. They can't automate their workers to robots because it's not effectively maximizing capital.
Raising min wage to $15 will only raise inflation and %%% of taxes collected. Only winners? The multinational corporations and government tax collectors. Why do you think the big corporations stay quiet and let the small business owners cry about $15 min wage and let the media portray mom and pops stores as the bad guys for being greedy?
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 00:23:48 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Small business is the backbone of America and innovation in general.
dynf ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:55:06 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Not to mention the same things happening on an international scale. It's the same thing. Foreign businesses unfairly outcompete domestic ones, which decreases jobs and lowers wages by shrinking entire industries. Why do liberals stand for unfair competition? It's like they want their country to slowly shrivel up and die.
That's where all the jobs are. People that have to work at fast food places make up a significant part of every community. I'd rather pay more at a fast food restaurant than have people out of work or making so little money that they're bound to poverty. There just aren't that many jobs out there that aren't getting replaced by automation, replaced by outsourcing/insourcing, or disappearing completely. Also, our minimum wage is artificially low because of the mismatch between pay and inflation. It should be somewhere closer to 15 dollars than where it is now and that's still not a lot of money.
Federal minimum wage full time is barely over $15,000 a year before taxes and that's working 40 hours a week every week all year and most state's minimum wage isn't that much bigger. That's insane. I want Americans to be able to live off of the money they earn from working full time. It's absurd that this is even a demand. People in the 50
s and 60's would be terrified if they knew this was our future.
Elaus ยท 39 points ยท Posted at 17:55:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But it's 'lifting all boats'!!! How can you be against that?!?!?! What could go wrong??
[deleted] ยท 77 points ยท Posted at 18:24:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Inflation? What's that? Are you fatshaming me?
e: ooh, got downvoted one second after posting. I always thought the downvote brigade was just legend.
Oh trust me, far from a legend. Every time I've posted shitting on socialism with solid arguments I get several downvotes and maybe 1 answer with a retard saying things like roads are socialist.
The berniecucks and their "tolerance", they are a good representation of what they adore: Dissent voice? Gulag.
[deleted] ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 23:36:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be fair, roads are a "social good", but roads serve ALL people. Same deal with our military, they're there to protect the entire country. Furthermore, you can still build private roads and hire private security.
Welfare, on the other hand, only serves a select group (the poor).
Roads and military go as far as the Ancient Rome, it's absolutely stupid to claim it's "socialism", a countermovement to the increasing capitalism on the wake of Industrial Revolution.
It doesn't matter it's a social good, it has nothing to do with a specific ideology, capitalism doesn't have roads or what? That's simply retarded.
This has been my one issue with Reddit. Anyone that disagrees with you can just down vote instead of replying with a reasoned response & at least give you the opportunity counter back. When you think about it when you downvote without a reason or explanation, that really is taking a cowards way out & it fits in with people that don't want either confrontation or have any explanation for their opinion. It is beyond me why anyone would have an opinion without understanding why they feel the way they do.
Geez a down-vote but no comment. All a basement dweller has to do is hit the down -vote button. No explanation necessary. That must have taken all your "Keyboard Kourage" to muster up the confidence for that one. Down voting without a reason is for the weak & feeble minded snowflake.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 21:32:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You know what's going to happen if thy all of the sudden raise the minimum wage to whatever absurd number they want? The Dunkin Donuts technique will be adopted, the companies will go automatic and fire thousands of workers. Employment will go DOWN because these whiny college students wanted more money for less work.
If we gradually increase the wages to stay in unison with inflation, that'll be fine, but we can't just raise it to 15$ out of the blue, it won't work.
MikeSV ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 23:41:05 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If we gradually increase the wages to stay in unison with inflation, that'll be fine, but we can't just raise it to 15$ out of the blue, it won't work.
The problem is that minimum wage has not kept up with inflation. I agree that a gradual increase is the way to do it, but the fact is that gradual increases have not happened in the last 6 years as minimum wage has been stagnant since 2009. I also agree that $15/hr is high, but some people in this subreddit seem to think that minimum wage should not be raised at all, which is ridiculous. We need a significant raise to get to where we should be due to inflation and then need to keep pace with inflation from there on out.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:46:21 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But then we give them do nothing government jobs! Because the middle class should be milked dry, works out great every time
Fun fact, companies like Walmart actually lobby for the increase of minimum wage. That way any small company trying to compete with Walmart is forced to pay their employees more, and when they can't afford it they shut down, eliminating Walmart competition.
Increasing the minimum wage actually allows for large companies like Walmart to get even bigger and stronger, and makes it even harder for the average joe to start their own business.
Unfortunately, a liberal wouldn't be able to follow what I've said so it doesn't really matter anyway.
To be honest, a good argument to counter the McDonalds thing is that companies like McDonalds are already running at the absolute minimum staff they can run with. Sure, they could fire most of their staff, but that would leave them understaffed, and critically so.
How the fuck can Walmart employ so many people yet only have 2 out of 20 registers open at any time? Why did they even bother building that many checkout counters?
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:09:31 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I live in a nation where the minimum wage is already higher than $15. It's $17.50 at this point in time.
All that really happens, is absolutely everything. from housing, to groceries, to utilities (gas/electricity), essential items, luxury items...
it all just goes up in price. the higher cost of living soon negates the benefits of the higher wage.
Then it goes in cycles. cost goes up, wage goes up, cost goes up again. and so on and so forth.
But in reality, if you're at minimum wage levels. you're going to struggle to make ends meet.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 00:37:36 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The left's arguments vilify the likes of Walmart and mcdonalds but never mention small biz. Meanwhile they're arguing to strengthen the likes of Walmart with the minimum wage increase!
Small businesses don't pay minimum wage because they have to look their employees in the face each day. I run a business. It does not hurt me at all to pay my employees a good wage. If I paid them minimum wage which is double and a half of what they make now then I'd have more money but at the expense of other businesses where they spend all that extra cash; and I'm just talking about three people. Imagine if all businesses in the US raised their pay to a living wage? The demand death that is the major issue with the US economy would be gone. The companies that pay minimum wage are often the richest companies in the world, not small businesses, and they pay so little because of the stock market, not because they couldn't run if they paid their employees more and raised their prices by a few cents (that's what it comes out to in a lot of places). That's why the minimum wage needs to be raised and enforced on a federal level. Corporations, being a psychopathic entity, do everything they can to limit spending if they can and that includes doing everything they can not to pay their lowest and most numerous workers a fair wage. Our economy is completely different now from what it was even 10 years ago. Most jobs aren't manufacturing anymore where people make things. The jobs being created now are in fast food, hospitality, retail. These are shitty jobs but profitable for the corporations that run them. It sucks that half the country has to work at places like this but that's the reality. If we accept that people in America are going to make third world wages working shitty jobs then that's fine but I'd like to think we aren't so dumb as to allow ourselves to stay this way. If people are constantly struggling to keep their head above water then they won't have any room to do anything interesting which has been the hallmark of America forever; entrepreneurship. It's near impossible to start a business or get an education if you can barely make enough money to afford shelter for fucks sake.
The best way to make an economy work well is to ensure that money is in the hands of consumers, but that can't be done if there are a few thousand people all the way at the top and then hundreds of millions in poverty and just above it. Companies that pay minimum wage do so because they can. It's a legislative issue that it takes an act of congress to raise the minimum wage. Every year, money is worth less due to inflation. Therefore, raising the minimum wage to an appropriate level is necessary in an economy where so many jobs are corporate shit jobs that barely pay anything. If we don't change how little large corporations pay their lowest workers then we will have to continue paying another way via welfare (which some companies even tell their employees how to apply for). That's a classic example of socializing costs and privatizing profits. It's absolutely necessary to raise the minimum wage every couple years and lately it's been lagging way behind. Minimum wage in the 60's was equal to over $12 in today's money.
When people have disposable income, everybody benefits. Even the companies that still go by the starvation model. They have no idea that if they all paid their employees more, the costs would be negligible compared to the benefits of having a country where people can afford to spend money on something other than their rent, food, bills and their debts; people in America are struggling to afford basic human necessities because of the mismatch between workers' paychecks and the costs of living. People in this thread are actually talking about letting the market decide the minimum wage. There are millions and millions of people out of work that would kill for a job. Do people have any idea what would happen if there was no federally mandated wage floor?
Dude you all need to get your shit together. The most beautiful richest state in the union is being run by fucking prepubescent fags. Wtf
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 19:32:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
Glasgo ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:26:39 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Well our cost of living is higher. But this is also why I oppose bernies tax plan since it doesn't take into account that a middle class wage is higher in California than other states due to cost of living.
Edit: good point making it city based though since some cities (SF) are absurdly expensive compared to others.
So you make more than a quarter mil a year? Because thatโs the point at where you would even begin to notice it, much less be hurt by it.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 21:36:55 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sanders healthcare plan has a 8.4% across the board tax. Sanders also wants to tax financial transactions and raise the social security tax slightly(.2%).
But you no longer have to pay health insurance premiums. It's much cheaper in the end. Also, he's not raising taxes 8.4% he's adding to the current obamacare tax to make it 8.4%.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:38:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Including my employers contribution, I pay 2k a year for healthcare. The breakeven point there is 24k a year. Which means I will notice it way sooner than "250k". At 50k a year I am looking at 2.2k in new spending.
There's no way in hell the combined monthly healthcare cost between you and your employer is $2,000 a year. You must have real shitty insurance. My portion alone is 260 a month and my employer covers 60% of the cost. This doesn't include life, dental, or eye.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:10:07 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Its a high deductible plan yes, but I don't get sick so that doesn't really matter, and I saved up enough to cover my deductible just in case.
And If you want a cheaper plan, check the marketplace. Its 160ish a month if you are in your mid 20s, even without any marketplace savings.
You should also be away that the 3.8 Obama care tax is a surtax on earnings above $200,000 on average (this varies based on your marital status when you file) so under Bernies tax plan you will still be exempt from this. Also note, that last I heard, Trump wants to do away with Obama care and return to business as usual healthcare meaning your cheap health insurance will no longer exist.
Second, understand that you're in a very unique situation. You have the luxury of being able to purchase the cheapest possible plan as you're single, without children, and choose to purchase a high deductible plan, likely without dental or eye. Not everyone has this option. Many married families has premiums in the $400 range and that's the low end. A single payer system invested into by everyone under a tax plan regulates insurance costs so they remain constant and fair making the average cost per American $42 assuming every tax payer invests.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:13:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But I am not making over 200k though. I make 60k a year. That comes out to 5k a year, which is way more than I currently pay.
Really, Sander's plan is a wealth transfer from the young to the middle age, as thats where medical spending is.
Unless Sanders changes which income bracket the tax applies to, which he has made no indication that he is going to do so, you will not be required to pay the 8.4% surtax because you make less than $200,000 a year.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:35:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The 8.4% surtax is across the board, not just to people making over 200k a year. You should read his actual policy, 6.2% payroll+2.2% income.
Glasgo ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:57:16 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
If you make 100k per year then bernie would increase your tax by about 9k per year according to the Vox calculator.
Edit: If anyone cares, I chose 100k because that is a middle class income in the sf bay area and a typical entry level software development salary here
If you have a skilled job, you are not making minimum wage. Rising minimum wage doesn't mean someone who's making $20/h now makes $35/h cause minimum wage got hire.
But it means people making minimum wage can now afford to support themselves, which means the rest of us don't have to. There will always be the need for people to do remedial jobs, and they should be compensated fairly.
You're literally the one creating the environment. Instead of paying the extra 25cents at mom & pops you go to Walmart. Dont tell me it will break your budget if you combine both shopping at Wal Mart & Mom n Pops instead of buying every fucking thing at Wal-Mart.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:44:56 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's not my responsibility to look after businesses. If they want my business, they should offer it the cheapest, most convenient way possible.
Someone is going to pay for it in the end. Consumers vote with their money. Keep dreaming its the government jobs to make sure people are well paid, not the consumers who do business with the companies.
Thrugg ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:06:09 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Which means the rest of us won't have to? Have you ever taken an Econ class? When there are artificial restraints on supply and demand on wages, AKA minimum wage laws, it results in unemployment. Raising it will result in massive nationwide unemployment. Now we ARE supporting more people and at a greater level of support.
Also. In terms of always need for people. Not all jobs. Do you think cashiers will exist anymore ? My Wendy's is already automated. You place your order on a tablet, swipe your card, your food gets called out with the name from your card five mins later. 0 human interaction.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 20:38:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And it's led to a society with vast wealth inequality, in which a minimum wage is not enough to live off of. Just realize that you are supporting these people because they aren't paid a living wage inspite huge profit margins from their employers.
You're not supposed to live off a minimum wage. Just like you're not supposed to live off welfare. You make it sound like people are forced to work these jobs. Honestly, I think lack of educational improvement is what creates this artificial ceiling of "I have to do this the rest of my life". We should maybe subsidize trade schools or community college courses/certifications in relevant fields.
kmoz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:31:22 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Quite honestly people are forced to work these jobs. There just simply aren't enough higher paying jobs out there.
How do you feel about Walmart employees getting over 6 billion dollars a year in your tax dollars because they pay their people so little they have to be on government programs? That's a direct cost subsidy you are currently paying.
Actually quite the opposite. No one is forcing them to do anything. To get an education. To stay in school. To pick a career path if they decide to not pursue higher education. To leverage all the free public resources available to them (library, Internet, job fairs). To the people perpetually stuck in minimum wage jobs, it seems to me to be the product of cumulative bad decision and a general sense of laziness. There are billions of people who would literally kill for the opportunity of $7.25 an hour.
For your second question what do you want me to say? I hate poor people? Walmart cashier is not a career path. If you choose to do that, by all means go ahead, just don't expect me to feel sorry for you. Question for you: would you rather have this $15 minimum wage for employees, which will most certainly lead to workforce reduction&automation as well as increased hiring qualifications (unemployment goes up), or keep the $7.25 minimum while employing more people?
kmoz ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 03:27:53 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I want to know how you address the fact that your tax dollars are spend subsidizing extremely profitable companies profits. Even if youre the most cold hearted person on earth regarding the poor, that cant sit well with you.
There are simply not enough jobs that qualify as "career path" out there. Nobody WANTS to work one of those jobs. They fucking suck, people arent doing it because they have options. Walmart cashier should to pay enough to at least feed you and put a roof over your head though, which you simply cant do on todays minimum wage. Even at 15 bucks an hour (in 2022 or whatever the proposal timeline is), youre not living some life of luxury, youre scraping by. You cant afford to go to college on that without getting huge debt, you cant really afford a kid on that, you cant pay surprise medical bills which will ruin you because your health insurance is shit (if you have it).
To address your questions: I dont think unemployment will go up anywhere as much as you think, because youre giving the people that spend the highest % of their income more income. Thats actually a large boost to potential incomes for companies. Thats ultimately why trickle down economics dont work: Rich people dont spend anywhere as much of their money.
Even if unemployment does go up, you now have a huge amount of extra money available in government programs to actually support the people that need it, rather than people that are full time workers who wont need it.
Also, automation is happening regardless of the minimum wage. this might push it to happen a year sooner, but its coming no mater what. Technology is improving at an exponential rate, the second the technology is there to make it happen, youll see it in huge waves. people simply cant compete with the ability to be always open, perfectly accurate, and in no need of training.
I think you're confusing people who work at Walmart receiving government assistance with "Walmart getting a check from the government". I'm getting around to your other questions I've been out of town this weekend
kmoz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:18:44 on April 4, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The person getting government assistance is wages Walmart is not paying them that they should be. Exact same as handing Walmart the check if they were paying them a livable wage, except with some bonus inefficiency of being a govt program.
qaaqa ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:41:28 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
ThIs meme is not a trump position.
Even worse it makes it appear trump is against higher wages which he isnt.
Trump wants to bring higher wages back to the usa.
This makes trump seem like all the old republican candidates that failed because they didn't care about unlivable wages.
Trump isn't Romney. Don't turn him into Romney.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:08:04 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
The problem with minimum wage isn't that it makes it harder for for employers to hire you.
The problem is that, if the minimum wage is $X per hour, and Joe's work provides less than $X of gross before-tax value, then the law is actually FORBIDDING Joe from finding a job. You're taking away Joe's rights, and then tellim him it's for his own good. (BTW, This is actually the economic justification for welfare)
Also, when Joe gets his welfare check, he is forced to purchase goods and services of inferior quality (due to labor shortage), and at a higher price (because of inflation).
On the other hand, there is a valid counter-argument against this point. The left will often argue that economics is cold, hard science. And since science has no morals, it sometimes reveals truths that are unpleasant. And if a fact makes me feel icky, then it must not be true.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 22:25:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For fucking real! So sick of these dumb fucking cucks
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:18:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Don't ever try and explain this to a liberal. Math is too hard. Then they'll just say "basic income" as if that was a viable solution to anyone.
MikeSV ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 23:46:18 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Minimum wage needs to increase with inflation, not sure why that is difficult for some people to understand. Insulting people and calling them "cucks" does not change the fact that minimum wage has been stagnant for 6 years and needs to be increased. $15/hr is high, but an increase to $10-11 would put it in line to where it should be due to inflation.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 23:52:04 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
triggered
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 23:59:20 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 00:05:35 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Labor should be determined by the demand and supply of workers. Period. Not inflation. Increasing wages based on inflationary would only increase inflation. Also
Somebody making $7.25 an hour working full time is going to need to government assistance to be able to live. Why should my tax dollars have to foot the bill because companies can't shell out an extra dollar or two per hour.
Because people have been conditioned to believe that the people needing help in this country are the wealthy. That's why we help billionaires pay for their labor when their workers work for them full time and still need section 8 and SNAP.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:01:52 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Your comment has been automatically removed because you either used a redd.it shortlink, or you linked to a thread outside /r/The_Donald without using the np subdomain for no-participation mode. Please REPOST your comment with the correct. Do not message the mods asking to approve the removed comment.
Please use full-length URLs only, and please use no-participation mode (np.reddit.com links) when linking to other subreddits.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:47:37 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Auto godmod removed my first comment for the unfiltered link.
Reposting:
Ah, my sweet summer child American. Ontario has the largest sub-sovreign debt in the world, we've had a government so leftist that it would make Bernie Sanders blush for over a decade, our current Premier (something like a Governor in your terms) is a straight-up SJW, and THIS is currently the top story in /r/canada:
The real wage won't rise. It's why nearly all of North America has found a stagnant wage - at best - at the lower-middle and lower income levels. Despite increased nominal wage increases, the real wages stagnate or decrease.
Whoever said if they get hired at that rate that they have to give them full time?? Two to three hours a day for three days a week. Let's them focus on school instead of work.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:24:37 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
โWashington is really overperforming on employment growth,โ said Ahu Yildirmaz, head of research for ADP, a payroll services company.
Nationwide, employment and wages both increased by 2.1 percent year-over-year during the fourth quarter of 2015.
In Washington, however, employment climbed by 3.7 percent. Much of that came from hiring in construction, information technology, professional services, and leisure and hospitality industries
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 21:51:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just give it the benefit of the doubt and think about it for a moment... With a minimum wage hike suddenly all of that work force has expendable income and no need to supplement their minimum jobs with welfare, just to make ends meet. Not only that but now they also have more expendable income, to be spent locally (fast food, movie theaters, grocery stores, etc), and for savings. Not only that but you also have all of those other non-minimum wage, but professional nonetheless, jobs that were below the $15/hr rate (EMT's for example) that will get bumped up also because they were not minimum wage jobs before the hike, and they will still not be minimum wage jobs after the hike. And with those, you get the same as above (more expendable income, able to save more, etc.), and so on. You hear all the time people saying that you can't build a good structure without a good foundation, from the bottom up, just like the economy.
Soโฆ youโre too lazy to read what Iโve provided you? Sorry, not spoon feeding you what you want. Iโve got better things to do than engage in actions that could very well be troll-feeding; Iโve already done half the legwork. What you need is all there, especially in the last bulleted item. Git at โer, sparky!
All your sources depend on one single study: The Cepr study in the first link.
I'm on mobile so I can't link a rebuttal I'd saved.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:18:24 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Do people not understand what a pitiful amount of money is spent on wages in most industries?
Doubling Walmarts workers wages would only increase the average Americans bill there by not even a cent on the fucking dollar.
Low margin is not the same as all your costs are in labor.
Would the cost of framing a house go up and getting lawn care services? Undoubtedly.
Lower employment? There is very little evidence of that, we were 50% of world GDP with full employment with much relative higher minimum wages and tax rates less than 100 years ago.
Less Americans could hire maids and they'd have to mow their own lawn. Maybe pay a living wage for fruit, what a tragedy.
Why can't we be more like Saudi Arabia and have an underclass scrub our toilets for nothing? lol
We were 50% of the global GDP because the rest of the worlds industrial capacity was bombed into rubble and ours went untouched. That's why we were able to get away with higher wages and taxes - GDP growth was in double digits after WW2.
Now American workers and businesses have to compete globally.
I should also mention that government spending as a percentage of GDP declined after WW2 compared to record spending today.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:44:42 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Minimum wage explained for people that don't like other people.
The CATO institute is to economics what climate denying scientists are to science; people paid a shit ton of money to write papers where they sell their soul.
What Berniebots do not understand is that when illegals are deported and banned businesses will have to pay a liveable wage or go without workers. Getting rid of illegals will increase the minimum wage.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:54:15 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
Burukai ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 22:45:51 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is bullshit. The real economics is that when more people have more money businesses make more money. Someone working 40 hours a week really should be able to live in a reasonable apartment and be able to afford to eat.
What I don't get about the people who oppose this is that they don't seem to understand that the taxpayers are currently paying to subsidize the income of all the people making 5-7 dollars an hour. Wouldn't it make more sense to stimulate the economony, increase the available cashflow, and use those tax dollars for something better?
There may be a few businesses that have to change how they operate but the vast majority will see increased revenue and the truly rich who are benefiting most from low wages will have to pay their fair share.
It is the short-sighted self-interests of business that shepharded this economic decline in the first place... offshore manufacturing brought down goods pricing but it also destroyed the disposible income levels of the middle class, reducing the buying power. A few corporations moved manufacturing overseas to increase profits and the rest had to follow to remain competetive but it was not for the greater good of North America at all.
What city do you live in that you think this is possible? Where I live, minimum wage is $8.31. A single bedroom apartment, if you're extremely lucky, is $800/month. That leaves you ~$500 a month, before taxes, for utilities, groceries, car insurance, health insurance, phone bill, gas, etc. These arent luxuries- they are necessities. What if you have a child? There are many hard working people just stuck in a shitty situation, trying to support themselves and their loved ones. Show me the numbers, or the standard of living you think is acceptable for someone to live off minimum wage. No insurance, no food?
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:39:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wrong, a car is a luxury. Sounds like you live in a similar area I do. 800$ per month might be the cost of a cheap 1 bedrood app in the city. But if you move outside the city I guarantee you could find a place for under 500$. What metroplex are you talking about? I could find a place 500$ less than 45 minutes away through a quick Google search.
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:46:23 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So you go 45 minutes out from the city... how do you get a job? how do you get to work? You can't afford a car and you certainly cannot afford a 500 dollar a month fuel bill. It is 4 hours a day on busses and you have to wait for two hours after your shift for the bus that goes out that way.
It is not realistic... the reason why rent outside the city is less is because everything else is more expensive and there is no nearby work.
The problem is that millions of people who ARE working hard are unable to make a decent living. They can survive but what happens when an unexpected medical bill comes due or any number of other expenses. They don't and cannot have any savings to suffer them. What happens when they have a family?
And this is so millionaires and billionaires can make even more profit.
you obviously do not understand what living on 5 dollars an hour is like.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 16:01:49 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You keep on saying 5$ an hour. That's not minimum wage. And yes it sucks but you're getting paid minimum wage, it should be just enough to live off of.
You seem to think you're entitled to luxuries.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:59:41 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Everyone in a country as weathly as the united states should be able to afford to house, feed and cloth themselves at a reasonable standard if they work 40 hours a week. That is all anyone is saying... Even 15 dollars an hour is still a bare minimum standard of living. Not even close to luxurious.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:03:04 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not a house. A roof over your head. Minimum should be enough to live off of, which it is. You want more? Go out and work for it. Young people these days are so dam entitled I swear. You don't deserve stuff just for breathing.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:30:13 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I said 'to house' not 'a house'. This has nothing to do with entitlement there are certain jobs that will always pay less than others and certain people that will always only be able to work those jobs. The issue is that wages have not kept up with the true cost of living and the life a person can live on 7 or 8 dollars an hour is not what it should be in the 'richest country on earth'. There are people who are lazy and may benefit from a raise that maybe shouldn't. But, more importantly, there are millions of people who are work hard and just don't have any other options. Those are the people that deserve it.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:36:39 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You say they deserve it. I say they should earn it.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:08:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
yeah 'earn it' by becoming drug dealers and criminals? obviously you have never been in a possition where there really are few options. When people have no option but poverty what do you think they should do? People that spend all their time working and caring for their families don't have time or money for education or seeking better employment.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:59:35 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yea I never said that. You're putting words in my mouth. This whole conversation started from you saying you couldn't live off minimum wage. You definitely can. You just won't have luxuries
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:43:00 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And what you don't see is that when you force people without options to 'make due' with less you are encouraging crime and drug activity.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:49:24 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't force anyone to steal. They make that choice themselves.
You need to grow the fuck up. Ok? Just because you don't make as much as you think you should doesn't make it ok to take something that someone else did.
Man. I swear arguing with Bernie fans is nuts. Yall always play the victim.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:41:02 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't work for minumum wage and actually make a decent living. To be honest I hate people on welfare who play the system and I hate entitled people who want everything for nothing.
but raising the minimum wage isn't about that. It's about catching wages up to the costs so people who put in a decent amount of effort can live a similar life to what was possible in the past and what is possible now in other wealthy nations.
Ok, I see your point about the car. I live in a suburb 45 minutes outside the city. Downtown, rent for a 1 bedroom is at least $1500. Let's say you have no car. You still have to get to work, and since you can't afford to live downtown that probably means taking a bus. Riding the bus here is also insane though. A bus ticket to get to the city for work is $4.50 one way. So the cost of getting to work is high with or without a car.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 01:09:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:06:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You are subscribing to short sighted selfishness. When you raise the quality of life for all people in your country everyone prospers. When will you asshats stop thinking about yourselves and take a second to think about the greater good?
How is the current economy in any way sustainable?
Real change is made by real changes.
Are you saying that you wouldn't pay 30 cents more for a bag of apples if you knew that all the people who got that apple to you were able to feed their kids a proper meal every day?
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 20:49:48 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:45:42 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To say "why not $100/hr?!?!" is a ridiculous argument. You do not have any basis for your point other then greed.
Acting for the greater good helps you as much as everyone else. People like you are why the economy is where it is.
Pathetic.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:41:29 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:39:17 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Your argument doesn't make sense. No one is arguing for a 50 dollar an hour minimum wage and no one would it is ridiculous. But a minimum wage that reflect cost of living increases and inflation isn't unreasonable.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 09:10:27 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:08:55 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
You don't know what you are talking about. The only evidence that really matters is that your line of thinking has shaped policy over the last 20 years and it has literally broken the economy and devastated the middle class... at what point do you feel things should change? when entire comunities of the united states devolve into slums? When the global economy collapses?
It's time now. Get over yourself and your elitist bullshit and take a look at what really works and makes a difference.
go circle jerk with the rest of your idiots.
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:08:08 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Will it be that easy to get away from global trade? Never mind that tariffs with many of our trading partners are illegal right now, changing these existing deals will require an act of (our bought and paid for) Congress.
I'm not against the idea, mind you, of an isolationist trade policy. Just not sure how feasible it is.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:49:08 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Supply and demand. Working for wages is selling your labor. Make your labor more valuable and you get more money.
Likewise, competition drives wages down, because supply and demand. Curb illegal immigration and people will have a better stance for negotiating wages.
MikeSV ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:57:03 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Illegal workers make up around 5% of the workforce. Getting rid of all the illegal workers is not going to have a significant impact on supply and demand of the workforce. Also, having a minimum wage that has not increased with inflation is embarrassing for a first world country like ours.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:33:54 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Only when you include the entire workforce. Service industry is looking at 33% illegals on its own. That's significant.
As for the other thing, not an argument. Pegging minimum wage to inflation is shallow and pedantic. I can throw out snarl adjectives in lieu of an argument too.
There is no general "wages". Some people have more valuable skills. If you're worthless, guess what? You're not worth much. It ain't fucking rocket science.
Build the wall, limit competition for jobs that don't require any skill and they'll have to pay more. This is called logic. OR let every indigent from around the world come here from a life of absolute poverty, get surprised when low skill jobs pay nothing and blame the 1% cause they have more than you.
That's a pretty small portion of the American work force though
MikeSV ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:50:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So in your opinion, minimum wage should not keep up with inflation? And how will removing illegal workers have a positive impact on American workers if their wages don't keep pace with inflation? "It'll work itself out" is not a viable solution.
Okay fine, adjust it for inflation. Though doubling it doesn't sound like a solution either. After all, we're trying to create jobs for our youth. Earning minimum wage should not be a long term goal
All of Trump's swag says made in China while Bernie's says MADE IS USA.
What is hilarious about this cuck is its the opposite.
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 21:01:31 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:39:50 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Removing illegal immigrants is a good start. Lots of companies will need to pay more to fill those positions. Renegotiating trade deals to bring manufacturing back to the US is another big point of his.
Also, the employer mandate on health insurance has made employees a lot more expensive and Trump wants that repealed.
[deleted] ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 01:17:20 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When the tide goes out, we'll see who's been swimming naked.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:03:14 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And drowns all the people.
Flunchzz ยท -12 points ยท Posted at 21:38:50 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Raising minimun wages motivates the youth to work, the reason they arent working is because it isnt worth it, not because the employers cant afford them.
LitHit ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 21:45:12 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not worth it? As if they have a goddamn choice? When you have bills, you have to work. Get a job, work your way up. Use your brain to negotiate a better deal for yourself and play the game. This is how it is supposed to be. Unfortunately, youth is so goddamn coddled and lazy, they want it handed to them e.g. minimum wages that are sky high. You better believe when I was a middle-manager back in the day making 15/hr I'd quit in a heartbeat to make 15/hr flipping burgers. Fuck, a robot can do that job, why wouldn't I? Thank god I saw the light. Seriously, how does one simply choose NOT to work because it isn't worth it? Are they printing money?
AskMeIfISupportTrump ยท 35 points ยท Posted at 23:51:03 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You mean people don't want to hire 17 year olds at fifteen dollars an hour?
FlorianPicasso ยท 74 points ยท Posted at 21:08:23 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's a fine image.
theGreatGoodbye ยท 23 points ยท Posted at 00:32:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Woah that's such a rare pepe
FlorianPicasso ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 03:17:24 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Your reaction
staytaytay ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 00:46:21 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
R A R E
A
R
E
browwiw ยท 59 points ยท Posted at 23:36:06 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I honestly welcome 15 dollar an hour minimum wage. It will spur corporations to make leaps and bounds in automation technology.
[deleted] ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 00:34:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As someone who works in data, mmmmmm.
Tillhony ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 01:05:14 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
As someone who works in a automation company. OH god please no. But yes at the same time.
browwiw ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 00:44:38 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is more an /r/futurology thought, but actual AI with strong voice recognition/synthesis technology will end human tech support and probably be a massive blow to India's tech support economy.
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 02:41:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Only because tech support got waaaay worse since the 90's. I had a "tier 3" guy from the philipines put system32 into a zip file and delete it to save space.
Took out a production server part of a massive EMR system I run.
My director has been "re-assigned"
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:07:52 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 04:44:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
500+ clinics, 3 9's uptime.
In business critical environments, you can't even outsource the simple stuff. Risk is too high.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 04:56:02 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 05:02:28 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I've built 2 large EMR environments running different software. One designed for clinics, the other designed for multiple hospitals relying heavily on intersystem HL7 messaging.
One system acts as a central EMR system for every hospital in the city, so no matter which hospital you show up at they'll have your entire up to date history (attending, xrays, pharma, etc etc) with just your name or phone number. Even has built drug interaction and procedural risk assessment (Cerner Multum integration). Not as smart as those first year arts bernie supporters though.
[deleted] ยท -6 points ยท Posted at 00:54:09 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
browwiw ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 01:27:54 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It was a tangent, you cuck pedant.
Nogoodsense ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 01:59:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Please dear God Kek, who wathces over us and blesses us with memes and lulz, please give me a future that contains McD's where I don't have to interact with sassy windowlicking burnouts to get a meal.
browwiw ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 02:27:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
They could literally just turn the touch screen picto-gram register around and let you order and pay that way.
dynf ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:04:26 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Such kiosks exist now in McDonald's in France. McDonald's in France kicks ass and McDonald's in America is annoying and disgusting in comparison. They're very different places.
Nogoodsense ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:12:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Had the same in Switzerland when I was there. So nice to not have to worry about language barriers when ordering food.
PolarisIII ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 11:47:17 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You know what they call a quarter pounder in france?
I_not_Jofish ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:48:23 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What's wrong with working at a fast food restaurant?
Nogoodsense ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 03:12:13 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Nothing is wrong with the act of working at a fast food place.
Unfortunately the majority of people who make that choice do so out of lack of options. Low education. Low professionality. Unrefined manners. Etc.
This is reflected in the user experience of interacting with them when making orders.
By contrast , here in Japan, fast food workers are fast, polite, and professional. They take pride in their job. Even if it's min wage. It's a culture thing.
Fire-Keeper ยท 128 points ยท Posted at 18:42:36 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
birdboy can't make high energy trade deals that will actually bring back the american economy and abundant good paying jobs. trump will do more for the black youth in 1 year than obama ever fucking did.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 94 points ยท Posted at 20:33:45 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
WHITE PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S IT LIKE BEING POOR
[deleted] ยท 41 points ยท Posted at 23:20:48 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 23:28:00 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Apparently according to sanders any cup held by a non white is full of change.
Ebola300 ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 03:12:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Way to take what he said out of context.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:22:24 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Ebola300 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:41:02 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I guess it's okay since people do it to yours? Typical.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:50:16 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:13:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
LOL REEEEKT
HowDoInternets ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 01:50:16 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I was slightly behind him until he said that. I don't even respect him as a person anymore. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.
[deleted] ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 03:40:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Tbh, it was referencing ghettos specifically. People will always take shit out of context though and Trump always seem to get the worst of it.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 10:09:57 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ghettos are social constructs, they weren't just made for blacks you racist fuck.
Bmandoh ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 12:01:59 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
In America, only the blacks, or Japanese, were ever put in one dumbass.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 12:06:52 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What does this even mean Bernie Bot?
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 04:02:25 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lol - grew up in a trailer living on food bank. Slept on a couch because grandma had my bedroom. Last time I checked I am about as Caucasian as one can get - Czech and Scandinavian. Yah I know poor.
[deleted] ยท -15 points ยท Posted at 21:46:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:55:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท -10 points ยท Posted at 21:57:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:58:17 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Nema_K ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:06:28 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I mean, there's also a lot more white people than black people in the country. If you're looking at pure numbers than yea you're right but there's a significantly higher percentage of poor minorities than poor white people.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:29:39 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Nema_K ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 23:20:31 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When I first replied he only had the part in all caps. I was just pointing out that saying there's more poor white people than poor black people is a stupid argument because there's almost 3x as many white people than black people in the US. Percentages should really be used for those kind of comparisons.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 22:07:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:14:10 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
CintasTheRoxtar ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 23:22:17 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Damn are you stupid or trolling?
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:24:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:32:43 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well you might be wrong about the poverty rate, but its the welfare rate that counts. Despite the fact that there are far more whites in poverty welfare distribution is almost equal according to DOC http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 01:36:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 22:17:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:27:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:35:40 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:01:19 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:06:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:27:46 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:20:48 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:07:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:17:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
yoyo2598 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:04:28 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's funny how you talk about race the most and then call everyone else racists GTFO
BAETLA ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:09:28 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Nice response. Now this time I want you to try as hard as you can to not bring up race. Make any point you would like, but nothing to do with race. Healthcare? Foreign policy? Social issues? Let's talk about it, but don't bring up race. Believe it or not by trying to be as racially tolerant as possible, you end being as racially intolerant as the people you are defending against.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:19:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Politics in America is about race, has been since the civil rights act got passed. Why would he lie about the realities of relative poverty of the two communities?
Most minorities would probably be Republicans if they had followed Eisenhower lead with desegregating the military and been the ones to pass racial equality.
Every since then that's what politics is about. Now I could just talk about policy and why it matters. But that's not what animates most of you. It's race, that's how we got these ideological monstrosity that is the Republican party and the corporatist democrats.
Republican strategists openly talked about this, this isn't' a secret. It was called the Southern Strategy. That's the legacy the modern Republican party is built on. Not Lincoln or Eisenhower. Nixon and the silent racist majority now turned minority
"Don't talk about race it shouldn't be talked about let's just pretend that nothing we do could possibly have a racial animus even though we're America" lol
That's not going to happen
BAETLA ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:27:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Race being brought up in every discussion is part of the reason racism still exists. We need to discuss what would benefit Americans, not certain ethnic groups.
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 22:40:56 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Again we know there are racist policies passed in America, we know there are racists who hold power. They did it overtly not long ago
A white nationalist successfully won office in 88 in Louisiana. David fuckign Duke
I'm all for not calling Trump a racist when he hasn't done something racist. Like saying unlimited immigration isn't good for America and illegals need to go home. That's not racist.
Telling a black protester he should go get a job may not even be racist. But it's clearly a dog whistle whether he consciously meant it that way or just thought of them as lazy hippies. It has political implications
He's definately courting the white nationalist vote or he'd be telling everyone how he's going to be GREAT for cops AND reduce the amount of non violent drug offenders in prison.
He doesn't, because everything in American politics is viewed through the lense of race.
If political strategists think about these things then you as an American citizen would be an idiot not to. These are the people who determine whether or not a campaign is going to be racially animated not you or I.
And all the evidence says Republican campaign managers consciously court white nationalists in many parts of the country.
BAETLA ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:43:44 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I understand what you are saying but I wish it wasn't that way. Race baiting is definitely a political strategy and it is being used like a cheap hooker in this election.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:52:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's the reality of the Republican party, it's a monstrosity built on racial animus.
Trump is doing a very interesting thing. I was really hopeful he would draw the line at Latinos and really court black voters.
He's taken the opposite and more conservative approach of just sticking with racial animus though. "law and order" voter is the same thing as racist voter.
On what planet doesn't he deserved to get burned for this?
He should be out there saying "cops have too much to do we need to tone down these drug laws and make it less of a priority so they aren't busting down doors for small bags of reefer so they have time to focus on the rapists and murderers"
Instead we get more dog whistles about locking black men up. Whether he's a racist or not he's running a campaign with not very subtle white nationalist overtones.
edit - and he should add in some shit about it being unsustainable and we shouldn't be paying private prisons to lock people who aren't a threat to people or property.
BAETLA ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:55:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Well I will respectfully agree to disagree with your entire statement quite honestly. Thank you for being civil.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:25:49 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:29:25 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yes brown America shaped American politics?
Do you hear yourself?
We were over 80% white when views on race became the main determinant of your party affiliation. Because that's how the Republcian strategists crafted their policy, that's how we went from Eisenhower with huge public spending and desegregating the military to the Reagan talking about "welfare queens" and a fucking democrat getting away with doing the same in Clinton
You can blame Jews maybe, but brown America? lol
There was no agency. There was no brown mainstream media, brown politicians, brown bankers, brown lawyers. lol
And I would quibble with the argument that Jews some how stoked racial tensions instead of healed them in this country. Bigotry isn't good for business. Teaching children about the realities of American history is not stoking racial tensions.
[deleted] ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 21:29:34 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A delusional and senile old fuck who's lost touch with reality. Tragic... I really feel for his family at this point.
Dryad2 ยท 33 points ยท Posted at 19:49:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The ban hammer is swift and deadly wow.
I couldn't even reply with facts to those who were crying that executives make more.
Anyways I still would like to add to the discussion that. The biggest group of employers is the small business sector (under 500 employees).
The small business sector do not have access to corporate welfare on the level the multinationals do.
So raising min wages to $15 is raising costs to a small business owner.
Small businesses cannot outsource their employees in most cases. They can't automate their workers to robots because it's not effectively maximizing capital.
Raising min wage to $15 will only raise inflation and %%% of taxes collected. Only winners? The multinational corporations and government tax collectors. Why do you think the big corporations stay quiet and let the small business owners cry about $15 min wage and let the media portray mom and pops stores as the bad guys for being greedy?
[deleted] ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 00:23:48 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Small business is the backbone of America and innovation in general.
dynf ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:55:06 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Not to mention the same things happening on an international scale. It's the same thing. Foreign businesses unfairly outcompete domestic ones, which decreases jobs and lowers wages by shrinking entire industries. Why do liberals stand for unfair competition? It's like they want their country to slowly shrivel up and die.
nearlyheadlessbick ยท 29 points ยท Posted at 19:31:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It makes me laugh when fast food workers want $15 an hour, I mean do they want to get replaced by machines?
dynf ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 03:09:56 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Most fast food workers look like they want to crawl in a hole and die.
NadoSorc ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 04:29:47 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't blame them.
McGuineaRI ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:15:45 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
That's where all the jobs are. People that have to work at fast food places make up a significant part of every community. I'd rather pay more at a fast food restaurant than have people out of work or making so little money that they're bound to poverty. There just aren't that many jobs out there that aren't getting replaced by automation, replaced by outsourcing/insourcing, or disappearing completely. Also, our minimum wage is artificially low because of the mismatch between pay and inflation. It should be somewhere closer to 15 dollars than where it is now and that's still not a lot of money.
Federal minimum wage full time is barely over $15,000 a year before taxes and that's working 40 hours a week every week all year and most state's minimum wage isn't that much bigger. That's insane. I want Americans to be able to live off of the money they earn from working full time. It's absurd that this is even a demand. People in the 50 s and 60's would be terrified if they knew this was our future.
Elaus ยท 39 points ยท Posted at 17:55:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But it's 'lifting all boats'!!! How can you be against that?!?!?! What could go wrong??
[deleted] ยท 77 points ยท Posted at 18:24:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Inflation? What's that? Are you fatshaming me?
e: ooh, got downvoted one second after posting. I always thought the downvote brigade was just legend.
Backfrommyashes ยท 18 points ยท Posted at 20:11:35 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Oh trust me, far from a legend. Every time I've posted shitting on socialism with solid arguments I get several downvotes and maybe 1 answer with a retard saying things like roads are socialist.
The berniecucks and their "tolerance", they are a good representation of what they adore: Dissent voice? Gulag.
[deleted] ยท 10 points ยท Posted at 23:36:26 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be fair, roads are a "social good", but roads serve ALL people. Same deal with our military, they're there to protect the entire country. Furthermore, you can still build private roads and hire private security.
Welfare, on the other hand, only serves a select group (the poor).
Backfrommyashes ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 23:42:17 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Roads and military go as far as the Ancient Rome, it's absolutely stupid to claim it's "socialism", a countermovement to the increasing capitalism on the wake of Industrial Revolution.
It doesn't matter it's a social good, it has nothing to do with a specific ideology, capitalism doesn't have roads or what? That's simply retarded.
sensoryspinout ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 00:05:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This has been my one issue with Reddit. Anyone that disagrees with you can just down vote instead of replying with a reasoned response & at least give you the opportunity counter back. When you think about it when you downvote without a reason or explanation, that really is taking a cowards way out & it fits in with people that don't want either confrontation or have any explanation for their opinion. It is beyond me why anyone would have an opinion without understanding why they feel the way they do.
sensoryspinout ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 02:46:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Geez a down-vote but no comment. All a basement dweller has to do is hit the down -vote button. No explanation necessary. That must have taken all your "Keyboard Kourage" to muster up the confidence for that one. Down voting without a reason is for the weak & feeble minded snowflake.
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 21:32:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Relevant
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 02:45:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
WORKS JUST FINE IN BEST KOREA
Jackamalio626 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 21:36:27 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You know what's going to happen if thy all of the sudden raise the minimum wage to whatever absurd number they want? The Dunkin Donuts technique will be adopted, the companies will go automatic and fire thousands of workers. Employment will go DOWN because these whiny college students wanted more money for less work.
If we gradually increase the wages to stay in unison with inflation, that'll be fine, but we can't just raise it to 15$ out of the blue, it won't work.
MikeSV ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 23:41:05 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The problem is that minimum wage has not kept up with inflation. I agree that a gradual increase is the way to do it, but the fact is that gradual increases have not happened in the last 6 years as minimum wage has been stagnant since 2009. I also agree that $15/hr is high, but some people in this subreddit seem to think that minimum wage should not be raised at all, which is ridiculous. We need a significant raise to get to where we should be due to inflation and then need to keep pace with inflation from there on out.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:46:21 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But then we give them do nothing government jobs! Because the middle class should be milked dry, works out great every time
reddituser676869 ยท 28 points ยท Posted at 21:50:14 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fun fact, companies like Walmart actually lobby for the increase of minimum wage. That way any small company trying to compete with Walmart is forced to pay their employees more, and when they can't afford it they shut down, eliminating Walmart competition.
Increasing the minimum wage actually allows for large companies like Walmart to get even bigger and stronger, and makes it even harder for the average joe to start their own business.
Unfortunately, a liberal wouldn't be able to follow what I've said so it doesn't really matter anyway.
regollyek ยท 21 points ยท Posted at 22:10:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
People don't seem to understand that.
McDonalds? They'll increase their wages to 15 dollars an hour, fire most of their staff and have one guy do the job of 4 people.
Mom & Pop Diner? They'll probably just shut down.
BigBlueBurd ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 01:35:03 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To be honest, a good argument to counter the McDonalds thing is that companies like McDonalds are already running at the absolute minimum staff they can run with. Sure, they could fire most of their staff, but that would leave them understaffed, and critically so.
MastuDenton ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 02:22:22 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How the fuck can Walmart employ so many people yet only have 2 out of 20 registers open at any time? Why did they even bother building that many checkout counters?
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 03:09:31 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I live in a nation where the minimum wage is already higher than $15. It's $17.50 at this point in time.
All that really happens, is absolutely everything. from housing, to groceries, to utilities (gas/electricity), essential items, luxury items... it all just goes up in price. the higher cost of living soon negates the benefits of the higher wage.
Then it goes in cycles. cost goes up, wage goes up, cost goes up again. and so on and so forth. But in reality, if you're at minimum wage levels. you're going to struggle to make ends meet.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 00:37:36 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The left's arguments vilify the likes of Walmart and mcdonalds but never mention small biz. Meanwhile they're arguing to strengthen the likes of Walmart with the minimum wage increase!
High energy comment reddituser647483288
McGuineaRI ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:12:26 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Small businesses don't pay minimum wage because they have to look their employees in the face each day. I run a business. It does not hurt me at all to pay my employees a good wage. If I paid them minimum wage which is double and a half of what they make now then I'd have more money but at the expense of other businesses where they spend all that extra cash; and I'm just talking about three people. Imagine if all businesses in the US raised their pay to a living wage? The demand death that is the major issue with the US economy would be gone. The companies that pay minimum wage are often the richest companies in the world, not small businesses, and they pay so little because of the stock market, not because they couldn't run if they paid their employees more and raised their prices by a few cents (that's what it comes out to in a lot of places). That's why the minimum wage needs to be raised and enforced on a federal level. Corporations, being a psychopathic entity, do everything they can to limit spending if they can and that includes doing everything they can not to pay their lowest and most numerous workers a fair wage. Our economy is completely different now from what it was even 10 years ago. Most jobs aren't manufacturing anymore where people make things. The jobs being created now are in fast food, hospitality, retail. These are shitty jobs but profitable for the corporations that run them. It sucks that half the country has to work at places like this but that's the reality. If we accept that people in America are going to make third world wages working shitty jobs then that's fine but I'd like to think we aren't so dumb as to allow ourselves to stay this way. If people are constantly struggling to keep their head above water then they won't have any room to do anything interesting which has been the hallmark of America forever; entrepreneurship. It's near impossible to start a business or get an education if you can barely make enough money to afford shelter for fucks sake.
The best way to make an economy work well is to ensure that money is in the hands of consumers, but that can't be done if there are a few thousand people all the way at the top and then hundreds of millions in poverty and just above it. Companies that pay minimum wage do so because they can. It's a legislative issue that it takes an act of congress to raise the minimum wage. Every year, money is worth less due to inflation. Therefore, raising the minimum wage to an appropriate level is necessary in an economy where so many jobs are corporate shit jobs that barely pay anything. If we don't change how little large corporations pay their lowest workers then we will have to continue paying another way via welfare (which some companies even tell their employees how to apply for). That's a classic example of socializing costs and privatizing profits. It's absolutely necessary to raise the minimum wage every couple years and lately it's been lagging way behind. Minimum wage in the 60's was equal to over $12 in today's money.
When people have disposable income, everybody benefits. Even the companies that still go by the starvation model. They have no idea that if they all paid their employees more, the costs would be negligible compared to the benefits of having a country where people can afford to spend money on something other than their rent, food, bills and their debts; people in America are struggling to afford basic human necessities because of the mismatch between workers' paychecks and the costs of living. People in this thread are actually talking about letting the market decide the minimum wage. There are millions and millions of people out of work that would kill for a job. Do people have any idea what would happen if there was no federally mandated wage floor?
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 10:13:06 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think you might be retarded.
[deleted] ยท 13 points ยท Posted at 20:54:19 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Why do commies never separate teenage wages from an adult minimum wage anyway?
Anti-Dentite8910 ยท 16 points ยท Posted at 18:47:54 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fucking $15 in this shit hole of a state. Fuck me.
legalizehazing ยท 7 points ยท Posted at 22:01:31 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Dude you all need to get your shit together. The most beautiful richest state in the union is being run by fucking prepubescent fags. Wtf
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 19:32:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
Glasgo ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:26:39 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Well our cost of living is higher. But this is also why I oppose bernies tax plan since it doesn't take into account that a middle class wage is higher in California than other states due to cost of living.
Edit: good point making it city based though since some cities (SF) are absurdly expensive compared to others.
Mefic_vest ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 20:50:54 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So you make more than a quarter mil a year? Because thatโs the point at where you would even begin to notice it, much less be hurt by it.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 21:36:55 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Sanders healthcare plan has a 8.4% across the board tax. Sanders also wants to tax financial transactions and raise the social security tax slightly(.2%).
Those will hit you regardless of income level.
Dr_Ghamorra ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 22:33:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But you no longer have to pay health insurance premiums. It's much cheaper in the end. Also, he's not raising taxes 8.4% he's adding to the current obamacare tax to make it 8.4%.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:38:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Including my employers contribution, I pay 2k a year for healthcare. The breakeven point there is 24k a year. Which means I will notice it way sooner than "250k". At 50k a year I am looking at 2.2k in new spending.
Dr_Ghamorra ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:56:10 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There's no way in hell the combined monthly healthcare cost between you and your employer is $2,000 a year. You must have real shitty insurance. My portion alone is 260 a month and my employer covers 60% of the cost. This doesn't include life, dental, or eye.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:10:07 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Its a high deductible plan yes, but I don't get sick so that doesn't really matter, and I saved up enough to cover my deductible just in case.
And If you want a cheaper plan, check the marketplace. Its 160ish a month if you are in your mid 20s, even without any marketplace savings.
Dr_Ghamorra ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 00:05:14 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You should also be away that the 3.8 Obama care tax is a surtax on earnings above $200,000 on average (this varies based on your marital status when you file) so under Bernies tax plan you will still be exempt from this. Also note, that last I heard, Trump wants to do away with Obama care and return to business as usual healthcare meaning your cheap health insurance will no longer exist.
Second, understand that you're in a very unique situation. You have the luxury of being able to purchase the cheapest possible plan as you're single, without children, and choose to purchase a high deductible plan, likely without dental or eye. Not everyone has this option. Many married families has premiums in the $400 range and that's the low end. A single payer system invested into by everyone under a tax plan regulates insurance costs so they remain constant and fair making the average cost per American $42 assuming every tax payer invests.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:13:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But I am not making over 200k though. I make 60k a year. That comes out to 5k a year, which is way more than I currently pay.
Really, Sander's plan is a wealth transfer from the young to the middle age, as thats where medical spending is.
Dr_Ghamorra ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:19:05 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Unless Sanders changes which income bracket the tax applies to, which he has made no indication that he is going to do so, you will not be required to pay the 8.4% surtax because you make less than $200,000 a year.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:35:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The 8.4% surtax is across the board, not just to people making over 200k a year. You should read his actual policy, 6.2% payroll+2.2% income.
https://berniesanders.com/issues/medicare-for-all/
Glasgo ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:57:16 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
If you make 100k per year then bernie would increase your tax by about 9k per year according to the Vox calculator.
Edit: If anyone cares, I chose 100k because that is a middle class income in the sf bay area and a typical entry level software development salary here
TheGrandPigin ยท 8 points ยท Posted at 20:58:56 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There is no better stimulus for automation than raising the minimum wage. They are shooting themselves in the foot these deadbeats.
erik__ ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 02:36:26 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The real minimum wage is zero.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 19:12:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 19:39:36 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If you have a skilled job, you are not making minimum wage. Rising minimum wage doesn't mean someone who's making $20/h now makes $35/h cause minimum wage got hire.
falcon_jabb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:42:35 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But it means people making minimum wage can now afford to support themselves, which means the rest of us don't have to. There will always be the need for people to do remedial jobs, and they should be compensated fairly.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 19:56:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It also means prices of goods sold at McDonald's Walmart etc. Go up as well
[deleted] ยท -6 points ยท Posted at 20:15:05 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 20:21:55 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If it's necessaities they will pay for it. If you can't eat burgers at McDonald's bet your ass burgers at your supermarket are going up as well
[deleted] ยท -5 points ยท Posted at 20:40:48 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:13:47 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You're literally the one creating the environment. Instead of paying the extra 25cents at mom & pops you go to Walmart. Dont tell me it will break your budget if you combine both shopping at Wal Mart & Mom n Pops instead of buying every fucking thing at Wal-Mart.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 13:44:56 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:22:57 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
If you give a shit about something bigger than yourself, yes.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:12:28 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:08:13 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Someone is going to pay for it in the end. Consumers vote with their money. Keep dreaming its the government jobs to make sure people are well paid, not the consumers who do business with the companies.
Thrugg ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 20:06:09 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Which means the rest of us won't have to? Have you ever taken an Econ class? When there are artificial restraints on supply and demand on wages, AKA minimum wage laws, it results in unemployment. Raising it will result in massive nationwide unemployment. Now we ARE supporting more people and at a greater level of support.
Also. In terms of always need for people. Not all jobs. Do you think cashiers will exist anymore ? My Wendy's is already automated. You place your order on a tablet, swipe your card, your food gets called out with the name from your card five mins later. 0 human interaction.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 20:38:43 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
falcon_jabb ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 20:54:42 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The ratio of pay between the average worker and the CEO in America is the highest in the world, by a huge margin. This is where the money comes from.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 20:56:48 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just cause X is making more than Y, we don't take it away from X and give it to Y.
We support free markets and capitalism; just happens to be one of the greatest & innovate countries in the history of human race because of this.
falcon_jabb ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:02:58 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And it's led to a society with vast wealth inequality, in which a minimum wage is not enough to live off of. Just realize that you are supporting these people because they aren't paid a living wage inspite huge profit margins from their employers.
Gamecock448 ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 21:46:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You're not supposed to live off a minimum wage. Just like you're not supposed to live off welfare. You make it sound like people are forced to work these jobs. Honestly, I think lack of educational improvement is what creates this artificial ceiling of "I have to do this the rest of my life". We should maybe subsidize trade schools or community college courses/certifications in relevant fields.
kmoz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:31:22 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Quite honestly people are forced to work these jobs. There just simply aren't enough higher paying jobs out there.
How do you feel about Walmart employees getting over 6 billion dollars a year in your tax dollars because they pay their people so little they have to be on government programs? That's a direct cost subsidy you are currently paying.
Gamecock448 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:28:29 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Actually quite the opposite. No one is forcing them to do anything. To get an education. To stay in school. To pick a career path if they decide to not pursue higher education. To leverage all the free public resources available to them (library, Internet, job fairs). To the people perpetually stuck in minimum wage jobs, it seems to me to be the product of cumulative bad decision and a general sense of laziness. There are billions of people who would literally kill for the opportunity of $7.25 an hour.
Gamecock448 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:40:04 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For your second question what do you want me to say? I hate poor people? Walmart cashier is not a career path. If you choose to do that, by all means go ahead, just don't expect me to feel sorry for you. Question for you: would you rather have this $15 minimum wage for employees, which will most certainly lead to workforce reduction&automation as well as increased hiring qualifications (unemployment goes up), or keep the $7.25 minimum while employing more people?
kmoz ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 03:27:53 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I want to know how you address the fact that your tax dollars are spend subsidizing extremely profitable companies profits. Even if youre the most cold hearted person on earth regarding the poor, that cant sit well with you.
There are simply not enough jobs that qualify as "career path" out there. Nobody WANTS to work one of those jobs. They fucking suck, people arent doing it because they have options. Walmart cashier should to pay enough to at least feed you and put a roof over your head though, which you simply cant do on todays minimum wage. Even at 15 bucks an hour (in 2022 or whatever the proposal timeline is), youre not living some life of luxury, youre scraping by. You cant afford to go to college on that without getting huge debt, you cant really afford a kid on that, you cant pay surprise medical bills which will ruin you because your health insurance is shit (if you have it).
To address your questions: I dont think unemployment will go up anywhere as much as you think, because youre giving the people that spend the highest % of their income more income. Thats actually a large boost to potential incomes for companies. Thats ultimately why trickle down economics dont work: Rich people dont spend anywhere as much of their money.
Even if unemployment does go up, you now have a huge amount of extra money available in government programs to actually support the people that need it, rather than people that are full time workers who wont need it.
Also, automation is happening regardless of the minimum wage. this might push it to happen a year sooner, but its coming no mater what. Technology is improving at an exponential rate, the second the technology is there to make it happen, youll see it in huge waves. people simply cant compete with the ability to be always open, perfectly accurate, and in no need of training.
Gamecock448 ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:32:11 on April 3, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I think you're confusing people who work at Walmart receiving government assistance with "Walmart getting a check from the government". I'm getting around to your other questions I've been out of town this weekend
kmoz ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:18:44 on April 4, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The person getting government assistance is wages Walmart is not paying them that they should be. Exact same as handing Walmart the check if they were paying them a livable wage, except with some bonus inefficiency of being a govt program.
๐๏ธ SIThereAndThere ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:07:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
How about we let the minimum wage people speak instead you and SJW making assumptions?
trumpsanderspolitics ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 02:32:32 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Investors and businessmen aren't the same thing.
Ban me.
qaaqa ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 09:41:28 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
ThIs meme is not a trump position.
Even worse it makes it appear trump is against higher wages which he isnt. Trump wants to bring higher wages back to the usa.
This makes trump seem like all the old republican candidates that failed because they didn't care about unlivable wages.
Trump isn't Romney. Don't turn him into Romney.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 13:08:04 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
The problem with minimum wage isn't that it makes it harder for for employers to hire you.
The problem is that, if the minimum wage is $X per hour, and Joe's work provides less than $X of gross before-tax value, then the law is actually FORBIDDING Joe from finding a job. You're taking away Joe's rights, and then tellim him it's for his own good. (BTW, This is actually the economic justification for welfare)
Also, when Joe gets his welfare check, he is forced to purchase goods and services of inferior quality (due to labor shortage), and at a higher price (because of inflation).
On the other hand, there is a valid counter-argument against this point. The left will often argue that economics is cold, hard science. And since science has no morals, it sometimes reveals truths that are unpleasant. And if a fact makes me feel icky, then it must not be true.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 22:25:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
of_course_jeeves ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:30:41 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's not good enough to raise the minimum wage to $15 pounds which destroys jobs and hurts small businesses
NadoSorc ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 04:31:34 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Different argument.
m1sta ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 21:38:59 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Here's the logic...
There's only a problem if you don't believe in the intelligence and capability of american entrepreneurs.
NoStumpoTrumpo ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 20:05:50 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
so true
legalizehazing ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 20:19:58 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
For fucking real! So sick of these dumb fucking cucks
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:18:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Don't ever try and explain this to a liberal. Math is too hard. Then they'll just say "basic income" as if that was a viable solution to anyone.
MikeSV ยท 9 points ยท Posted at 23:46:18 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Minimum wage needs to increase with inflation, not sure why that is difficult for some people to understand. Insulting people and calling them "cucks" does not change the fact that minimum wage has been stagnant for 6 years and needs to be increased. $15/hr is high, but an increase to $10-11 would put it in line to where it should be due to inflation.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 23:52:04 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
triggered
[deleted] ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 23:59:20 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 00:05:35 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Labor should be determined by the demand and supply of workers. Period. Not inflation. Increasing wages based on inflationary would only increase inflation. Also
triggered
LargeDan ยท 5 points ยท Posted at 01:52:25 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Somebody making $7.25 an hour working full time is going to need to government assistance to be able to live. Why should my tax dollars have to foot the bill because companies can't shell out an extra dollar or two per hour.
McGuineaRI ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 02:33:15 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Because people have been conditioned to believe that the people needing help in this country are the wealthy. That's why we help billionaires pay for their labor when their workers work for them full time and still need section 8 and SNAP.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:01:52 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I live in Ontario. I want out.
RoC-Nation ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:53:05 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just curious, why do you want out of Ontario?
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:45:22 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
AutoModerator ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:45:22 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Your comment has been automatically removed because you either used a redd.it shortlink, or you linked to a thread outside /r/The_Donald without using the np subdomain for no-participation mode. Please REPOST your comment with the correct. Do not message the mods asking to approve the removed comment.
Please use full-length URLs only, and please use no-participation mode (np.reddit.com links) when linking to other subreddits.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:47:37 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Auto godmod removed my first comment for the unfiltered link.
Reposting:
Ah, my sweet summer child American. Ontario has the largest sub-sovreign debt in the world, we've had a government so leftist that it would make Bernie Sanders blush for over a decade, our current Premier (something like a Governor in your terms) is a straight-up SJW, and THIS is currently the top story in /r/canada:
https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/4cknye/ontarians_warming_to_guaranteed_minimum_income/
RoC-Nation ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:34:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Thanks for your anwer. Mind if I ask another question?
Why, from your point of view, is this guaranteed minimum bad?
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:42:03 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It is the welfare state on steroids, with all the negatives dialed up to 11.
RoC-Nation ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:02:57 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Fair point. Thank you again for taking your time to answer my questions.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:10:45 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I'm tagging you as 'Exceptionally polite Redditor'
RoC-Nation ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:21:45 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My pleasure, sir!
PeachyKarl ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:13:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Double the wage, people need to work half as long so they can employ twice as many, great idea.
Sgt_pile ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:38:34 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The real wage won't rise. It's why nearly all of North America has found a stagnant wage - at best - at the lower-middle and lower income levels. Despite increased nominal wage increases, the real wages stagnate or decrease.
Slimjerry ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:44:09 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But can he see why kids like cinnamon toast crunch?
Cheeseisextra ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:48:20 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Whoever said if they get hired at that rate that they have to give them full time?? Two to three hours a day for three days a week. Let's them focus on school instead of work.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:24:37 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j01L69eXdI
This video does a great job of explaining why high minimum wage hurts the economy
flackattack ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 05:18:08 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Y'all heard of econonomics, I mean economics? Infation? Save me baby Jesus.
hydro22k ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 12:05:10 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
http://www.businessinsider.com/asher-edelman-endorses-bernie-sanders-2016-3
Real life Gordon Gecko talking about the velocity of money
Wake up sheeple. A living wage is a great thing.
southpluto ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:45:44 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
wages should at least be raised to account for the rising inflation rates. I dont know how you can disagree with that
NevyTheChemist ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 23:27:40 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
The only reason minimum wage needs to be raised is because of inflation.
Nacho_Papi ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 21:39:35 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Washington state seems to be doing just fine after their minimum wage was raised.
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 21:51:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Nacho_Papi ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 21:53:47 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ok.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:56:57 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Nacho_Papi ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:33:08 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Just give it the benefit of the doubt and think about it for a moment... With a minimum wage hike suddenly all of that work force has expendable income and no need to supplement their minimum jobs with welfare, just to make ends meet. Not only that but now they also have more expendable income, to be spent locally (fast food, movie theaters, grocery stores, etc), and for savings. Not only that but you also have all of those other non-minimum wage, but professional nonetheless, jobs that were below the $15/hr rate (EMT's for example) that will get bumped up also because they were not minimum wage jobs before the hike, and they will still not be minimum wage jobs after the hike. And with those, you get the same as above (more expendable income, able to save more, etc.), and so on. You hear all the time people saying that you can't build a good structure without a good foundation, from the bottom up, just like the economy.
legalizehazing ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 22:07:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lolololo lol claiming raising min wage increases employment lolololililololololol uhh cuck lives
Nacho_Papi ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:23:57 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ok.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:10:03 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 20:25:42 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Mefic_vest ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 20:49:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Why saying anything about Seattle is jumping the gun: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-seattle-s-minimum-wage-kills-jobs-but-data-20160222-column.html
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:49:30 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Mefic_vest ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:31:08 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Soโฆ youโre too lazy to read what Iโve provided you? Sorry, not spoon feeding you what you want. Iโve got better things to do than engage in actions that could very well be troll-feeding; Iโve already done half the legwork. What you need is all there, especially in the last bulleted item. Git at โer, sparky!
of_course_jeeves ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 01:33:01 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
All your sources depend on one single study: The Cepr study in the first link.
I'm on mobile so I can't link a rebuttal I'd saved.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:18:24 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Do people not understand what a pitiful amount of money is spent on wages in most industries?
Doubling Walmarts workers wages would only increase the average Americans bill there by not even a cent on the fucking dollar.
Low margin is not the same as all your costs are in labor.
Would the cost of framing a house go up and getting lawn care services? Undoubtedly.
Lower employment? There is very little evidence of that, we were 50% of world GDP with full employment with much relative higher minimum wages and tax rates less than 100 years ago.
Less Americans could hire maids and they'd have to mow their own lawn. Maybe pay a living wage for fruit, what a tragedy.
Why can't we be more like Saudi Arabia and have an underclass scrub our toilets for nothing? lol
novacham ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:10:55 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
We were 50% of the global GDP because the rest of the worlds industrial capacity was bombed into rubble and ours went untouched. That's why we were able to get away with higher wages and taxes - GDP growth was in double digits after WW2.
Now American workers and businesses have to compete globally.
I should also mention that government spending as a percentage of GDP declined after WW2 compared to record spending today.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:44:42 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
McGuineaRI ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 02:34:27 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
Minimum wage explained for people that don't like other people.
The CATO institute is to economics what climate denying scientists are to science; people paid a shit ton of money to write papers where they sell their soul.
kek_mate ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:57:08 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
It's worse than this, double the minimum wage for LEGAL citizens. And then broadcast loud and wide that illegals won't be stopped.
Soo you can now get 3 illegals for the price of one legal worker. Congrats, you just done played yourself.
cannottsump ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:11:42 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What Berniebots do not understand is that when illegals are deported and banned businesses will have to pay a liveable wage or go without workers. Getting rid of illegals will increase the minimum wage.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:54:15 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
Burukai ยท -3 points ยท Posted at 22:45:51 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
This is bullshit. The real economics is that when more people have more money businesses make more money. Someone working 40 hours a week really should be able to live in a reasonable apartment and be able to afford to eat.
What I don't get about the people who oppose this is that they don't seem to understand that the taxpayers are currently paying to subsidize the income of all the people making 5-7 dollars an hour. Wouldn't it make more sense to stimulate the economony, increase the available cashflow, and use those tax dollars for something better?
There may be a few businesses that have to change how they operate but the vast majority will see increased revenue and the truly rich who are benefiting most from low wages will have to pay their fair share.
It is the short-sighted self-interests of business that shepharded this economic decline in the first place... offshore manufacturing brought down goods pricing but it also destroyed the disposible income levels of the middle class, reducing the buying power. A few corporations moved manufacturing overseas to increase profits and the rest had to follow to remain competetive but it was not for the greater good of North America at all.
legayredditmodditors ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 21:40:10 on April 14, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
some people like taxbreaks for large corporations, and effectively welfare that specifically benefits them (Walmart/McDonald's level businesses).
Even though it's retarded to argue for ANY form of it. Big or small.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:27:13 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You can live off of minimum wage working 40 hours a week. I'm so sick of you entitled brats thinking you can't.
You're lazy ass just assume that the standard of living includes a $2000 gaming computer, money for weed, a car and AC.
You can easily live off of minimum wage. No you won't have a luxurious life but if you want luxuries how about you go out and work for them?
Likeapeachh ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 03:40:39 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What city do you live in that you think this is possible? Where I live, minimum wage is $8.31. A single bedroom apartment, if you're extremely lucky, is $800/month. That leaves you ~$500 a month, before taxes, for utilities, groceries, car insurance, health insurance, phone bill, gas, etc. These arent luxuries- they are necessities. What if you have a child? There are many hard working people just stuck in a shitty situation, trying to support themselves and their loved ones. Show me the numbers, or the standard of living you think is acceptable for someone to live off minimum wage. No insurance, no food?
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 12:39:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Wrong, a car is a luxury. Sounds like you live in a similar area I do. 800$ per month might be the cost of a cheap 1 bedrood app in the city. But if you move outside the city I guarantee you could find a place for under 500$. What metroplex are you talking about? I could find a place 500$ less than 45 minutes away through a quick Google search.
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 14:46:23 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So you go 45 minutes out from the city... how do you get a job? how do you get to work? You can't afford a car and you certainly cannot afford a 500 dollar a month fuel bill. It is 4 hours a day on busses and you have to wait for two hours after your shift for the bus that goes out that way.
It is not realistic... the reason why rent outside the city is less is because everything else is more expensive and there is no nearby work.
The problem is that millions of people who ARE working hard are unable to make a decent living. They can survive but what happens when an unexpected medical bill comes due or any number of other expenses. They don't and cannot have any savings to suffer them. What happens when they have a family?
And this is so millionaires and billionaires can make even more profit.
you obviously do not understand what living on 5 dollars an hour is like.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 16:01:49 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You keep on saying 5$ an hour. That's not minimum wage. And yes it sucks but you're getting paid minimum wage, it should be just enough to live off of.
You seem to think you're entitled to luxuries.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 17:59:41 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Everyone in a country as weathly as the united states should be able to afford to house, feed and cloth themselves at a reasonable standard if they work 40 hours a week. That is all anyone is saying... Even 15 dollars an hour is still a bare minimum standard of living. Not even close to luxurious.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:03:04 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not a house. A roof over your head. Minimum should be enough to live off of, which it is. You want more? Go out and work for it. Young people these days are so dam entitled I swear. You don't deserve stuff just for breathing.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:30:13 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I said 'to house' not 'a house'. This has nothing to do with entitlement there are certain jobs that will always pay less than others and certain people that will always only be able to work those jobs. The issue is that wages have not kept up with the true cost of living and the life a person can live on 7 or 8 dollars an hour is not what it should be in the 'richest country on earth'. There are people who are lazy and may benefit from a raise that maybe shouldn't. But, more importantly, there are millions of people who are work hard and just don't have any other options. Those are the people that deserve it.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 18:36:39 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You say they deserve it. I say they should earn it.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:08:46 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
yeah 'earn it' by becoming drug dealers and criminals? obviously you have never been in a possition where there really are few options. When people have no option but poverty what do you think they should do? People that spend all their time working and caring for their families don't have time or money for education or seeking better employment.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 19:59:35 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Yea I never said that. You're putting words in my mouth. This whole conversation started from you saying you couldn't live off minimum wage. You definitely can. You just won't have luxuries
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:43:00 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And what you don't see is that when you force people without options to 'make due' with less you are encouraging crime and drug activity.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:49:24 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't force anyone to steal. They make that choice themselves.
You need to grow the fuck up. Ok? Just because you don't make as much as you think you should doesn't make it ok to take something that someone else did.
Man. I swear arguing with Bernie fans is nuts. Yall always play the victim.
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 03:41:02 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I don't work for minumum wage and actually make a decent living. To be honest I hate people on welfare who play the system and I hate entitled people who want everything for nothing.
but raising the minimum wage isn't about that. It's about catching wages up to the costs so people who put in a decent amount of effort can live a similar life to what was possible in the past and what is possible now in other wealthy nations.
Likeapeachh ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:35:11 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Ok, I see your point about the car. I live in a suburb 45 minutes outside the city. Downtown, rent for a 1 bedroom is at least $1500. Let's say you have no car. You still have to get to work, and since you can't afford to live downtown that probably means taking a bus. Riding the bus here is also insane though. A bus ticket to get to the city for work is $4.50 one way. So the cost of getting to work is high with or without a car.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 01:09:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 15:06:51 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
You are subscribing to short sighted selfishness. When you raise the quality of life for all people in your country everyone prospers. When will you asshats stop thinking about yourselves and take a second to think about the greater good?
How is the current economy in any way sustainable?
Real change is made by real changes.
Are you saying that you wouldn't pay 30 cents more for a bag of apples if you knew that all the people who got that apple to you were able to feed their kids a proper meal every day?
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 20:49:48 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 22:45:42 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
To say "why not $100/hr?!?!" is a ridiculous argument. You do not have any basis for your point other then greed.
Acting for the greater good helps you as much as everyone else. People like you are why the economy is where it is.
Pathetic.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:41:29 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:39:17 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Your argument doesn't make sense. No one is arguing for a 50 dollar an hour minimum wage and no one would it is ridiculous. But a minimum wage that reflect cost of living increases and inflation isn't unreasonable.
[deleted] ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 09:10:27 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
[deleted]
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 18:08:55 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
You don't know what you are talking about. The only evidence that really matters is that your line of thinking has shaped policy over the last 20 years and it has literally broken the economy and devastated the middle class... at what point do you feel things should change? when entire comunities of the united states devolve into slums? When the global economy collapses?
It's time now. Get over yourself and your elitist bullshit and take a look at what really works and makes a difference.
go circle jerk with the rest of your idiots.
Burukai ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:08:08 on April 1, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2016/03/household-expenditures-and-income
legalizehazing ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:42:11 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Lololol
Popeholden ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 21:55:42 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
My question is how do we increase wages. Or are they to high and we should work to bring then down?
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:07:04 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Dr_Ghamorra ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 22:34:36 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Illegal immigration pales in comparison to the amount of visas being handout like candy on Halloween.
Popeholden ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:14:07 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Will it be that easy to get away from global trade? Never mind that tariffs with many of our trading partners are illegal right now, changing these existing deals will require an act of (our bought and paid for) Congress.
I'm not against the idea, mind you, of an isolationist trade policy. Just not sure how feasible it is.
[deleted] ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:49:08 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[deleted]
Popeholden ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:02:47 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Excellent comment.
You think Trump is planning on the same populist revolt as Sanders to reform trade policy?
SquidBlub ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:19:10 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Supply and demand. Working for wages is selling your labor. Make your labor more valuable and you get more money.
Likewise, competition drives wages down, because supply and demand. Curb illegal immigration and people will have a better stance for negotiating wages.
MikeSV ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:57:03 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Illegal workers make up around 5% of the workforce. Getting rid of all the illegal workers is not going to have a significant impact on supply and demand of the workforce. Also, having a minimum wage that has not increased with inflation is embarrassing for a first world country like ours.
[deleted] ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 04:33:54 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)*
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
SquidBlub ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:11:21 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Only when you include the entire workforce. Service industry is looking at 33% illegals on its own. That's significant.
As for the other thing, not an argument. Pegging minimum wage to inflation is shallow and pedantic. I can throw out snarl adjectives in lieu of an argument too.
Popeholden ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 00:00:18 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So we have to compete with Chinese labor standards?
legalizehazing ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:05:56 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
There is no general "wages". Some people have more valuable skills. If you're worthless, guess what? You're not worth much. It ain't fucking rocket science.
Build the wall, limit competition for jobs that don't require any skill and they'll have to pay more. This is called logic. OR let every indigent from around the world come here from a life of absolute poverty, get surprised when low skill jobs pay nothing and blame the 1% cause they have more than you.
HighGradeQP ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 22:15:01 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Minimum wage stays the same, we remove the illegal who is willing to work for peanuts
It'll work itself out
Popeholden ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 22:24:29 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
That's a pretty small portion of the American work force though
MikeSV ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 23:50:41 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
So in your opinion, minimum wage should not keep up with inflation? And how will removing illegal workers have a positive impact on American workers if their wages don't keep pace with inflation? "It'll work itself out" is not a viable solution.
HighGradeQP ยท 1 points ยท Posted at 01:59:53 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Okay fine, adjust it for inflation. Though doubling it doesn't sound like a solution either. After all, we're trying to create jobs for our youth. Earning minimum wage should not be a long term goal
ILoveDraugr ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 00:42:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
I actually learned exactly this in economics class, Bernie must of skipped his class
rydan ยท 0 points ยท Posted at 02:08:02 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
But if you double minimum wage their mom's income goes up and they don't need a job.
[deleted] ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 18:52:27 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
JustDoinThings ยท 6 points ยท Posted at 18:54:32 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
What is hilarious about this cuck is its the opposite.
[deleted] ยท -4 points ยท Posted at 21:01:31 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 21:39:50 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Removing illegal immigrants is a good start. Lots of companies will need to pay more to fill those positions. Renegotiating trade deals to bring manufacturing back to the US is another big point of his.
Also, the employer mandate on health insurance has made employees a lot more expensive and Trump wants that repealed.
[deleted] ยท -2 points ยท Posted at 01:17:20 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
[removed]
of_course_jeeves ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 01:29:18 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Raising wage for workers isn't the same as state mandated raising of the minimum wage.
[deleted] ยท -1 points ยท Posted at 02:42:50 on March 31, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Minimum wage may not be bad, but minimum wage with a weak border control is 100% a disaster. I'd say a better solution is to bring back the jobs.
mrpbeaar ยท -6 points ยท Posted at 21:12:46 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
A rising tides raises all boats.
Gamecock448 ยท 4 points ยท Posted at 21:47:20 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
When the tide goes out, we'll see who's been swimming naked.
[deleted] ยท 2 points ยท Posted at 23:03:14 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
And drowns all the people.
Flunchzz ยท -12 points ยท Posted at 21:38:50 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Raising minimun wages motivates the youth to work, the reason they arent working is because it isnt worth it, not because the employers cant afford them.
LitHit ยท 11 points ยท Posted at 21:45:12 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Not worth it? As if they have a goddamn choice? When you have bills, you have to work. Get a job, work your way up. Use your brain to negotiate a better deal for yourself and play the game. This is how it is supposed to be. Unfortunately, youth is so goddamn coddled and lazy, they want it handed to them e.g. minimum wages that are sky high. You better believe when I was a middle-manager back in the day making 15/hr I'd quit in a heartbeat to make 15/hr flipping burgers. Fuck, a robot can do that job, why wouldn't I? Thank god I saw the light. Seriously, how does one simply choose NOT to work because it isn't worth it? Are they printing money?
Terra-Delu ยท 3 points ยท Posted at 22:02:33 on March 30, 2016 ยท (Permalink)
Even if that were true(which it is not), there will still be less jobs available. See the problem?