Make business better.™️
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Make business better.™️
TREVIGINTILLIONS

How you could have turned $1,000 into billions of dollars by perfectly trading the S&P 500 in 2014

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The chance of guessing a coin flip 248 times in a row is 1 in 452 trevigintillion—a 75-digit number. Winning the lottery—at odds of a couple hundred million to one—looks like a sure thing by comparison.

The likelihood of picking the best performing stock in the S&P 500 every trading day—248 of them—this year is even smaller than guessing those coin flips. Nonetheless, if you did it in 2014, you could have made yourself a billionaire in just eight and a half months from a $1,000 investment. You would have made more money than most American households make in an entire year in just over two months. By now you’d be the richest person in the world, with at least twice as much money as anyone else on the planet, $179 billion.

To accomplish this feat, you’d have to invest entirely in just one stock every day, and that stock would have to be the largest gainer of the S&P 500 on that day. Each day you’d reinvest all of your money in what you’d thought would be that day’s largest gainer, and you’d have to be right.

Here’s how it would have went:

Image for article titled How you could have turned $1,000 into billions of dollars by perfectly trading the S&P 500 in 2014

Of course once you’ve made enough money it would be impossible to put it all into one stock without drastically affecting the stock’s price. Before long, you’d find that there were not enough shares to buy, or that you had purchased an entire company—a situation that we ignored for our analysis. Furthermore, we did not include trading fees nor changes in the composition of the S&P and we assumed that investment in fractional shares was allowed by all companies.

A trader with this kind of unbelievable luck would have made less this year than a similar one last year. In 2013, that trader would have made $263 billion through the second week of December.

GOING ROGUE

The new Mission: Impossible movie plays on everyone's fears about AI

The film series has a knack for amplifying the dangers of powerful technologies

Image for article titled The new Mission: Impossible movie plays on everyone's fears about AI
Photo: Eric Gaillard (Reuters)

What if artificial intelligence surpassed humans and went on to rule the world? Would we start begging AI to spare our lives?

These are some of the questions that linger in viewers’ minds after watching the latest edition of the Mission: Impossible series, Dead Reckoning Part One, released on July 10.

The movie’s early popularity helped star Tom Cruise shatter a Rotten Tomatoes record. It also scores points for its timely portrayal of the potential dangers of AI, which is provoking deep anxieties in real life.

In Dead Reckoning, an all-conquering AI tool named “The Entity” goes rogue. Impenetrable by any human technology or weapon, it can scrub live video feeds, impersonate voices, crack identity security codes—even those using fingerprints—and orchestrate large-scale mayhem. Not surprisingly, governments yearn to possess it, to make themselves more powerful.

Tom Cruise has a warning for AI enthusiasts

Even as AI designers keep warning of its risks, with some saying that AI models can learn skills they weren’t trained for, Mission: Impossible  amplifies worries about the technology, depicting a sentient AI tool capable of mass extermination.

That scenario echoes the concerns of tech industry leaders such as Elon Musk and Steve Wozniak, the Apple co-founder, who recently signed a letter calling for a six-month pause on the training of AI models more powerful than OpenAI’s GPT-4 large language model. The letter, which has more than 33,000 signatures, asks AI innovators to stop “the dangerous race to ever-larger unpredictable black-box models.”

One fear is that a “superintelligent” AI like the Entity could emerge, with disastrous results for humanity. “If it’s much smarter than us, then it can get more of whatever it wants. First, it wants us dead before we build any more superintelligences that might compete with it,” Eliezer Yudkowsky, a co-founder and research fellow at Machine Intelligence Research Institute, wrote in the Guardian. “Second, it’s probably going to want to do things that kill us as a side-effect, such as building so many power plants that run off nuclear fusion.”

The Mission: Impossible catalog of existential threats to humanity

With its AI spin, Dead Reckoning is just the latest Mission: Impossible movie to highlight the hazards of the powerful technology du jour. But it’s worth remembering that, in most cases, our worst fears about them haven’t come to fruition.

Here’s a roundup of previous Mission: Impossible films, their tech villains, and how those menaces have played out in real life.