Replacing water with lava acts very oddly
When the /fill command is used to replace water with lava, it acts rather oddly. The bug only occurs when you actually use the "replace" argument, a normal fill command works fine.
Replacing lava with water doesn't cause this bug, but you can get an "unknown error" message if the selection was large enough.
To reproduce:
- Step 1: In a large body of water, use the following command:
/fill ~-50 ~ ~-50 ~50 ~ ~50 lava 0 replace water
- Step 2: Be extremely confused.
Relates to MC-49545.
2016-04-25, 03:08 PM
2016-10-27, 11:12 PM
2016-10-27, 11:12 PM
0
1
-